THIRTY YEARS AGO.
W
WEshowed from the pulpit, fully thirty years ago, that the answer of Peter to the three thousand on Pentecost, was not the same as the answer of Ananias, to Saul, of Tarsus, and the answer to Saul was not the same as the answer of Paul, to the Philippian jailer, and gave the reason for the difference. But that was not a difference betweenthenandnow, but difference in view of the difference in theconditions of persons at thesame time. The same difference is observed now, by all intelligent preachers, where they find the difference in the conditions of persons. If a man is a believer, they do not command him to “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.” If he has repented, they do not command him to repent. Or, if he has been immersed, they do not command him to be immersed; but to go on and unite with others who have been immersed into Christ, and observe all things, whatever the Lord has commanded. But attention to this is no difference betweenthenandnow, nor did the preacher, thirty years ago, fail to observe this difference, any more than now. On the contrary, the preachers then generally understood this better than the preachers do now.
We noticed the articles in question, carefully, to see the difference in the condition of thingsnow, demanding the different treatment, but in vain; we did not see it. The plain state of the case is, that there is nogeneral difference, and we now need thesame gospel, presented in thesame manner, as they needed then. Preaching always did take better effect, when presented in a pleasant manner, than when presented in an abrupt and repulsive manner. This we knew thirty years ago, as well as we know it now. All that can be truthfully said about this, opens the way for no change—nonew departure. Whatever was then true in this respect, is true now. A good and acceptablemannerin presenting the gospel was appreciated then as much as it is now, and was of precisely the same value. It was understood then as well as it isnow, that every improvement in manner had its value, and more attention was given to thematterthen, than now. There was then more sound preaching and teaching, than there is now, and less that was unsound.
We need solid and sound men now, faithful and true, not to preach something different, butthe same, not in a differentmannerfrom what we had thirty years ago, but in thesame manner; not toundowhat has been done by the labors of the holy men of the past fifty years, many of whom have fallen asleep in Jesus, but a few remain to this present; but to maintain, defend, perpetuate, and transmit it down through the ages, to the end of time. We want men that will not demoralize the people, specially our young preachers, by opening the way for somethingnewanddifferent; but maintain the same things, and be of the same mind, and of the same judgment; not preparing the way for somethingnew, but maintaining and defending theold,triedandunquestionable; not getting ready forchange—new departure—but “preach the word”—“continue in the things they have learned, and been assured of,” and not demoralize our young preachers with the idea of being on the wing; on a flight from one thing to another, in some wonderful career of progress; but exhorting them to be “rooted and grounded in the truth;” yes, more, in the “loveof the truth;” not only to maintain “sound speech that can not be condemned”—“sound words,” but the very “formof sound words.”