[1341]Currie,Med. Reports, 1805,II.458; Armstrong,Pract. Illustr. of the Scarlet Fever, Measles, &c.Lond. 1818; Lodge, of Preston, inMed. and Phys. Journ.XXXIII.(1815), p. 358.
[1342]W. Macmichael, M.D.,A New View of the Infection of Scarlet Fever, &c.London, 1822, pp. 30, 59, 78, 81-2. The title of another essay appears to reflect the same ideas,Caution to the Public, or hints upon the nature of Scarlet Fever, designed to show that this disease arises from a peculiar and absolute virus, and is specifically infectious in its mildest as well as in its most malignant form. By William Cooke, London, 1831.
[1343]Kreysig, “Ueber das Scharlachfieber,”Hecker’s Annalen,IV.273, 401, 1826, says that scarlatina had been “not only almost uninterrupted in all Europe since twenty-six or twenty-seven years [1799 or 1800], but also frightfully fatal.” The period in which this was written appears to have been one of fatal scarlatina in some parts of Germany; so also the years 1817-19, and the years 1799-1805 (as in Great Britain and Ireland). But the sweeping assertion as to frightful scarlatina mortality in all Europe without interruption since 1799 is clearly a flight of rhetoric, and is as nearly as possible the reverse of the truth so far as concerns Britain and Ireland.
[1344]Blackmore,Lond. Med. Gaz.VI.114.
[1345]Sandwith,Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.XL.249.
[1346]Aulsebrook,Lancet, 12 Nov. 1831, p. 217: cases of very malignant suddenly fatal scarlatina in infants and young persons up to the age of twenty-two. In the house of a canal boatman a son and two daughters, from 21 to 13 years, died in the course of two days after a very sudden and brief illness.
[1347]Rumsey,Trans. Prov. Med. Assoc.III.194.
[1348]Hamilton,Edin. Med. Surg. Journ.XXXIX.140.
[1349]Cowan,Journ. Statist. Soc.III.
[1350]Sidey, Stark and others inEdin. Med. and Surg. Journ.1835-36. H. Kennedy, M.D.,Account of the Epidemic of Scarlatina in Dublin from 1834 to 1842. Dublin, 1843.
[1351]The principal epidemics of scarlatina which have been inquired into by inspectors of the medical department since 1870 have been the following:
[1352]William Ogle, M.D., in the49th Report of the Registrar-General(for 1886), p. xiv.
[1353]See a paper, with Tables, on “Age, Sex and Season in relation to Scarlet Fever,” by Arthur Whitelegge, M.D. inTrans. Epidemid. Soc.N. S. VII.p. 153, for Nottingham and some other towns. A paper by Dr Ballard, “On the Prevalence and Fatality of Scarlatina as influenced by Sex, Age and Season,” which was written twenty years before but left unpublished, follows Whitelegge’s in theTrans. Epidem. Soc.N. S. VII.(1887-8).
[1354]A table of figures showing this will be found in Dr B. A. Whitelegge’s second lecture on “Changes of Type in Epidemic Diseases.”Brit. Med. Journ.4 March, 1893.
[1355]Longstaff,Trans. Epid. Soc.N. S. IV.(1880), 421, andStudies in Statistics. London, 1891, p. 310. D. A. Gresswell,Contribution to the Natural History of Scarlatina. Oxford, 1890, p. 193.
[1356]Journ. Scot. Meteorol. Soc.July, 1874, p. 195.
[1357]Cutaneous Diseases.Vol.I.1808, p. 254.
[1358]An unfortunate event that came under the writer’s notice some years ago may be illustrative of this. Two women with cancer of the breast were operated on, the one after the other, in the same operating theatre. Their beds were in the same hospital ward, but separated by the whole length of the ward. A few days after the operations, one of the women developed erysipelas, which was most extensive on the back; very soon after the other woman got the disease in a precisely similar way; they both died of it. As it seemed improbable that No. 1 had been infected in the ward, or that No. 2 had been infected from No. 1, (some dozen surgical cases between them escaping,) the suggestion arises of a common source of both infections in the operating theatre. The operating table was covered by a woollen cloth, of red colour so as not to show blood stains; it must have contained a good deal of putrid invisible blood from former operations.
[1359]The first instance showing this came from a dairy at Hendon. See James Cameron, M.D.Trans. Epid. Soc.V.(1885-6), p. 104; andibid.VIII.40. One of the latest and most fully investigated came from a dairy near Glasgow, J. B. Russell, M.D., LL.D., and A. K. Chalmers, M.D.Glas. Med. Journ.Jan. 1893, p. 1. An outbreak at Wimbledon and Merton is described,Rep. Med. Off. Loc. Gov. Bd.for 1886, p. 327. See alsoibid.for 1882, p. 63. The scarlatina caused by cream (with strawberries) is traced,ibid.for 1875, p. 72. A very clear case of scarlatinal epidemic due to contaminated milk occurred at Blackheath, both among children and adults, in April, 1894.
[1360]E. M. Crookshank,Path. Trans.XXXIX.382, in an extensive prevalence of cowpox on a dairy farm near Cricklade. No scarlatina could be traced in the neighbourhood.
[1361]Alfred Carpenter, M.D.Lancet, 28 Jan. and 4 Feb. 1871.
[1362]Wall,Gent. Magaz.1751, p. 71, 501. He quotes Severinus to the effect that the great epidemic ofgarrotilloin the province of Naples in 1618 was preceded by a murrain.
[1363]Prince A. Morrow, “Drug Eruptions,” edited for the New Sydenham Society by T. Colcott Fox, inSelected Monographs on Dermatology. London, 1893.
[1364]Hirsch,III.87.
[1365]Cullen,First Lines of the Practice of Physic, Part I., BookII.chap. 5, § 2, and BookIII.chap. 4.
[1366]On Cutaneous Diseases, vol.I., London, 1808, pp. 319, 326, 333. He included also thegarrotilloof Spain and the throat-plague of Naples (1618) among the “varieties of scarlatina,” inasmuch as they had not unfrequently a rash which was of the erysipelatous kind. Hirsch (u. s.) and Max Jaffe (“Die Diphtherie in epidemiologischer und nosologischer Beziehung vornehmlich nach Französischen und Englischen Autoren zusammengestellt,” Originalabhandlung inSchmidt’s Jahrbücher,CXIII., 1862, pp. 97-120) do not seem to doubt the diphtheritic nature of thegarrotillosof Spain and Italy in the 16th and 17th centuries, but they agree with Willan in classing most of the 18th century throat-distempers of English and American writers as scarlatinal, reserving as diphtheritic, or as more nearly allied to diphtheria, Starr’s “morbus strangulatorius” of Cornwall, some cases of infants recorded by Denman (supra, p. 714), Rumsey’s cases of “croup” (supra, p. 716), and the epidemic described by Bard, of New York (supra, p. 690). These matters of identification appear to be like matters of taste, for which the best rule isnon disputandum. I have already pointed out that Bard himself did not hesitate to identify the epidemic throat-disease of his time with that which Douglass had described in New England thirty years before.
[1367]P. Bretonneau,Des inflammations spéciales du tissu muqueux et en particulier de la Diphthérite, Paris, 1826, with supplement in 1827.
[1368]Id.Arch. gén. de méd., Jan., 1855.
[1369]Mackenzie,Ed. Med. and Surg. Journ., April, 1825, p. 294, andMed. Chir. Rev., 1827, p. 289, for Glasgow in 1819. The disease which Mackenzie called croup, was generally known in Glasgow at that time as “croupy sore throat.” It was very fatal, attacking several children in the same family, was reckoned contagious, was not a modification of scarlatina, was very different from idiopathic croup as it began on the tonsils and descended to the larynx and trachea, and, lastly, was sometimes marked by gangrenous foetor.
Robertson,Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.(1826)XXV.279, for Kelso in 1825.
Bewley,Dub. Journ. of Med. Sci.VIII.401, for Dublin in 1835-36. An outbreak observed by Brown, at Haverfordwest, in 1849-50, involving some 200 cases and 40 deaths, was identified in 1858 with diphtheria (Med. Times and Gaz., May, 1858, p. 566, see alsoMed. Chir. Trans.XL.49). Outbreaks more vaguely recalled in 1858 as diphtheria occurred at Ashford in 1817, and at Leatherhead (30 deaths in the workhouse) at an uncertain date (2nd Rep.(1859)Med. Offices Privy Council, pp. 244, 320). F. Ryland,Diseases and Injuries of the Larynx and Trachea, London, 1837, pp. 161-175, described a similar disease as a complication of measles at Birmingham in 1835.
[1370]Med. Times and Gazette,Lancet,British Med. Journal,&c.for 1858 and 1859. See references in Hirsch,III.89.
[1371]Second Report(for 1859)by the Medical Officer of the Privy Council, London, 1860, p. 161seq.Dr Greenhow published an essay on Diphtheria in 1860. Lectures important for the nosological definition were published by Sir William Jenner in 1861 (reprinted in 1893). Other essays called forth by the epidemic were by W. F. Wade (1858), Ernest Hart (1859), Edward Copeman (Norwich, 1859). Christison, J. W. Begbie and others wrote upon it in Scotland.
[1372]Mr Jones, of Fletching, Sussex, wrote that scores of cases (probably at least 50 or 60) have had more or less eruption. In one case it was general and bright.... It was like scarlatina ... but the whole surface was covered with minute miliary vesicles of clear fluid, ‘one mass of small vesications.’ There was a great deal of itching and no subsequent dropsy. In other cases the eruption was partial.Rep. Med. Off. Privy Council,II.(1859), p. 284.
[1373]Starr’s description for 1748 is referred tosupra, p. 695. Sanderson,Report, u. s. p. 263, says of the disease in 1858: “At Launceston the diphtheritic pellicle was tough, leathery, and highly elastic; and on the mucous surface of the fauces and pharynx it attained so great thickness (from one-tenth to one-eighth of an inch) that it was compared by several practitioners to the coriaceous lichens which grow on rotten bark. In the other districts this was never observed.”
[1374]G. B. Longstaff, M.D., “The Geographical Distribution of Diphtheria in England and Wales,” inSupplement to the 17th Annual Report of Loc. Gov. Board, 1887-8, p. 135. See also Downes,Trans. Epid. Soc.N. S.VII.193. Farr,Rep. Reg. Genl.for 1874, p. 219, gave the following illustration: “It is remarkable that of diphtheria, out of the same number born, more die in the healthy districts of England than in Liverpool; the proportions are 1029 in the healthy districts and 442 in Liverpool of 100,000 born. The deaths from scarlet fever are 2140 in the healthy districts to 3830 in Liverpool.”
[1375]8th Detailed Report of the Reg. Gen. Scot., p. xxxix.
[1376]R. T. Thorne, M.B.,Diphtheria: its Natural History and Prevention. Milroy Lectures for 1891. London, 1891.
[1377]Farr,Rep. Reg.-Genl.XXIV.(1861), p. 217.
[1378]Longstaff, u. s.
[1379]G. Budd, M.D., “Obs. on Typhoid or Intestinal Fever.”Brit. Med Journ., 9 Nov. 1861, p. 485.
[1380]Supra, pp. 210, 213.
[1381]Matthew A. Adams, cited by Thorne, u. s. with diagram.
[1382]M. W. Taylor, M.D., “Diphtheria in connection with Damp and Mould Fungi.”Trans. Epic. Soc.N. S. VI.(1886-7), p. 104. Thorne, u. s. gives instances in which diphtheria seemed to choose out wet and impervious soils.
[1383]L. Traube,Gesammelte Beiträge, &c., Berlin, 1871,II.11.
[1384]Thorne, u. s. has collected and analysed very fully the instances of diphtherial epidemics traced to cows’ milk. It is commonly assumed that the epidemics are either wholly diphtherial or wholly scarlatinal, but not a mixture of the two diseases.
[1385]W. N. Thursfield,Lancet, 3 Aug. 1878, p. 180, has contended for some such correlation between diphtheria and enteric fever in their respective preferences, at that time, for rural and urban districts.
[1386]William Heberden, M.D. junior.Observations on the Increase and Decrease of Diseases, particularly the Plague.Lond. 1801.
[1387]Among the numerous medical writers who have used it are Macmichael, Watson and Chevers. Among historians Lecky (I.573) has thought it worthy of mention among the progressive improvements of the 18th century.
[1388]Heberden (l. c. p. 42) accounted for the enormous increase of the article “convulsions” in the Bills by the inclusion under that term of most of the deaths originally entered under “chrisomes and infants,” which were infants under one month. But the latter had been mostly transferred at an early period while convulsions was still a small total; and even at the worst period of the public health in London, about 1730-40, they would not have accounted for a sixth part of the deaths under convulsions. The probability of the deaths from “griping in the guts” having been transferred to “convulsions” was pointed out in a review of Heberden’s essay in theBritish Criticon its appearance, without reasons given such as I adduce in the sequel.
[1389]Observ. Med.IV.cap. 7, § 2.
[1390]Ibid.III.cap. 2, § 54.
[1391]Pathol. Cerebri.Pordage’s Transl. p. 25.
[1392]Walter Harris, M.D.,Tractatus de Morbis Acutis Infantum. Lond. 1689. Engl. Transl. by Cockburn, 1693, p. 39.
[1393]Obs. Med.IV.cap. 2, § 7: “haud aliter ac si in aëre peculiaris mensis hujus [Augusti] lateat reconditum ac peculiare quiddam, quod specificam hujus modi alterationem, soli huic morbo adaptatam, vel cruori vel ventriculi fermento valeat imprimere.”
[1394]See the reference to Simpson’s essay,supra, p. 333.
[1395]W. Fordyce, M.D.A new inquiry into the Causes, Symptoms and Cure of Putrid and Inflammatory Fevers: with an Appendix on the Hectic Fever and on the Ulcerated and Malignant Sore Throat.London, 1773, p. 207.
[1396]See the Representation of the College of Physicians on Drink in 1726, cited at p. 84.
[1397]Joseph Clarke, M.D. “Nine-day Fits in the Lying-in Hospital of Dublin.”Trans. Royal Irish Academy(inMed. Facts and Obs.III.1792).
[1398]Moss, u. s. He makes out that the infants of the poorer class were much neglected by their drunken parents.
[1399]John Ferriar, M.D.,Medical Histories and Reflections. 2 vols. Lond. 1810.II.213 seq. “On the Prevention of Fevers in Great Towns.”
[1400]Watt, u. s., says that “bowel-hive” at Glasgow included, along with teething, “a promiscuous mass which may be considered nearly in the same light as the great number of deaths in the London bills of mortality ranked under the terms convulsions, gripes of the guts, &c.... If the patient dies in a state of convulsions, this, we are told, is owing to the hives having gone in about the heart, or their having seized the bowels.”
[1401]Hirsch,Geographical and Historical Pathology, Engl. Transl.III.376.
[1402]Supplement to the 45th Annual Report of the Registrar-General. London, 1885, p. xiii. Ballard, following the method of Pfeiffer (1871) for Asiatic cholera, has shown that the correspondence is closest with the temperature of the ground four feet deep.
[1403]Ballard,Report to the Local Government Board upon the Causation of Summer Diarrhoea, 1889, p. 32.
[1404]Willis mentions an instance (Pathol. Cerebri, Pordage’s transl. p. 25) which can hardly mean anything but congenital feebleness as a cause of infantile convulsions. A neighbour of his (in St Martin’s Lane) had lost all his children by convulsions within the space of three months. Another child was born, and Willis was sent for to advise what regimen should be followed so as to save it from the same fate.
[1405]This is clearly seen in comparing ages at death in Liverpool, and in Preston or Salford. Again in the ten years 1871-80, there were 4530 deaths from diarrhoea in the group of shipping towns, Yarmouth, Hull (with Sculcoates), Goole and Hartlepool, of which 70 per cent. were under one year, 19 per cent. from one to five, and 11 per cent. above five, chiefly in old age. In the group of Leicester, Worcester, Northampton and Coventry in the same period, there were 5001 deaths, of which 74 per cent. were under one year, 17 per cent. from one to five, and 9 per cent. above five, chiefly in old age.
[1406]Ballard,Report, &c.u. s. says that “occupation of females from home,” which had been often assigned by medical officers of health and others as a fruitful cause of infantile fatal diarrhoea, “resolves itself mainly into the question of maternal neglect, with the substitution more or less of artificial feeding for feeding at the breast.” Tatham,Brit. Med. Journ.1892,II.277, is of opinion that the rate of infant mortality was considerably increased by the practice, which obtained in most manufacturing towns, of allowing women to return to work within a week or ten days after their confinement, so that the duties of the mother were necessarily delegated. The paper by Dr G. Reid,ibid.p. 275, which called forth that and similar opinions as to the kind of maternal neglect that favoured the mortality by infantile diarrhoea, bore the title, “Legal restraint upon the employment of women in factories before and after childbirth”; but the emphasis falls almost wholly upon restraint of the mother’s industrial occupation after the child is born.
[1407]L. c. pp. 43-45.
[1408]Ballard, u. s. Table VI.
[1409]See former volume, p. 412.
[1410]The Triall of Tabacco, &c.by E. G. [Edmund Gardiner], Gent. and Practicioner in Physicke. London, 1610, fol.II.
[1411]Obs. Med.IV.cap. 2.
[1412]Ibid.IV.cap. 7.
[1413]Dr Andrew Wilson, a pupil of the Edinburgh School in the great period of the first Monro, Whytt and Rutherford, used his Newcastle experiences in 1758 and following years as the basis of two excellent essays, one on Dysentery (1761) and the other upon Autumnal Disorders of the Bowels (1765). In the latter he includes both cholera nostras and bilious colic, (as well as dry colic) as Sydenham had done, and makes the following distinction between the two forms, which “are very nearly allied in their nature”:—“The vomiting of bile in the cholera is not so early as it is in the other; neither is it so constant, nor in so large quantities. Though a purging generally attends the bilious colic, yet it does not correspond so regularly as it does in the cholera, in which there generally is a call to stool soon after every paroxysm of vomiting.... The bilious colic is not generally so quickly hazardous as the cholera is. The intervals between the sick fits are often longer, and when it is attended with danger, it does not become so so suddenly as the cholera does.” Bilious colic was not so strictly an autumnal complaint as cholera. It was not so soon relieved by medicines. It resembled cholera in the remarkable character of exciting cramps in other muscles than the abdominal.
[1414]Pharmaceutice rationalis.
[1415]Appendix toEssay on Smallpox, 1740.
[1416]Gent. Magaz., Sept. 1751, p. 398.
[1417]Two Papers on Fever and Infection, 1763, p. 35.
[1418]Med. Hist. and Reflect.II.220.
[1419]Ed. Med. Surg. Journ., 1807.
[1420]Charles Turner Thackrah,Cholera, its character and treatment, with remarks on the identity of the Indian and English. Leeds, 1832, p. 24.
[1421]W. Horsley,Med. Phys. Journ.24 March, 1832, p. 270.
[1422]Geogr. and Histor. Path.Engl. transl.III.315.
[1423]It is probable that the association of surfeit with bowel-complaint in general and at length with dysentery in particular came from the popular belief that these maladies of the autumnal season were due to repletion with fruit. That was the popular belief from an early period, which nearly all the medical writers on autumnal diarrhoea and dysentery took occasion to combat as either inadequate or erroneous.
[1424]See Vol. 1. of this History, p. 626. The following is in a letter from Charles Bertie to Viscountess Campden, London, 22 Nov. 1681: “I have safely received your choice present of four bottles, three of Plague and the other of Surfeit water, which I shall preserve against the occasion, being confident that better are not made with hands.”Cal. Belvoir MSS.(Hist. MSS. Com.)II.60.
[1425]Obs. Med.IV.cap. 3.
[1426]Pharmaceutice Rationalis, lib.III.cap. 3.
[1427]Supra, p. 103.
[1428]Andrew Fletcher,Two Discourses, &c.No. 2. p. 2, 1698.
[1429]John Jones, M.D.,De Morbis Hibernorum specialim vero de Dysenteria Hibernica. Accesserunt nonnulla de Dysenteria Epidemica. Inaug. Diss. Trin. Col. Dub. Londini, 1698, p. 12.
[1430]Edin. Med. Essays and Obs.I.(1733) 37,II.30,IV. V.
[1431]James Stephen, surgeon to Gen. Whetham’s regiment, in Pringle’s collection of accounts of the “Success of the vitrum Antimonii ceratum.”Ibid.V.pt. 2, p. 179, 4th ed.
[1432]Professor T. Simpson, of St Andrews, Andrew Brown, of Dalkeith, John Paisley and John Gordon, of Glasgow.Ibid.
[1433]Gent. Magaz., 1741, p. 705.
[1434]The “epidemic constitution” of 1743 was so markedly dysenteric after the influenza in the spring that Huxham regarded the dysentery as a sequela of the influenza.
[1435]Mark Akenside, M.D.,De Dysenteria Commentarius, London, 1764.
[1436]George Baker, M.D.,De Catarrho et de Dysenteria Londinensi Epidemicis utrisque An.MDCCLXII.Libellus, Lond., 1764.
[1437]William Watson, M.D., inPhil. Trans.LII.pt. 2 (1762), p. 647.
[1438]Pringle also, who was well acquainted with the dysentery of campaigns, speaks of the London epidemic as an exceptional occurrence, and as having caused few deaths.
[1439]Med. Obs. and Inquiries,IV.(1771), p. 153.
[1440]MS. Infirmary Book of the Foundling Hospital.
[1441]An Essay on the Autumnal Dysentery.By a physician (Andrew Wilson, M.D.), Lond., 1761 (Preface dated Newcastle, 25 March, 1760), pp. 1, 23.
[1442]Trans. K. and Q. Col. Phys.V.(1828), p. 221.
[1443]Obs. on the History and Treatment of Dysentery and its Combinations, etc., 2nd ed., Dublin, 1847.
[1444]Alexandri Tralliani Medici libri duodecim.Basil, 1556, Lib.VIII.pp. 423, 432.
[1445]Akenside,l. c.“Ut dysenteriam jam pro rheumatismo intestinorum habeam, et similem utriusque morbi causam et materiem esse contendimus.”
[1446]Hirsch,III.333 (Eng. transl.): “As to the influence of an extreme diurnal range of the thermometer (cold nights after very hot days) there is almost complete agreement among the observers in those parts [tropical and subtropical] of the world.”
[1447]I have enunciated this view of the pathology of acute rheumatism more fully in the Article “Pathology” in theEncyclopaedia Britannica.
[1448]Lond. Med. Journal.Editorial note,II.211. The parish register of Finchley shows double the average mortality in 1780, and indicates dysentery as a fatal malady. Lysons,Environs of London.
[1449]Moss, u. s.
[1450]Francis Geach, F.R.S.,Some Observations on the present Epidemic Dysentery, 1781.
[1451]Dennis Ryan, M.D., “Remittent Fever of the West Indies.”Lond. Med. Journ.II.253, iii. 63.
[1452]Dr Livingston to Dr Lettsom, Aberdeen, 29 June, 1789, inMemoirs of Lettsom,III.
[1453]Willan,Report on the Diseases etc., p. 42. The nearest approach to a fatality in dysentery, he says, happened in the case of a lady residing in Spa Fields, at whose window a brown owl, attracted by the solitary light, came flapping and hooting at midnight, to the great aggravation of the patient’s symptoms.
[1454]Bateman, u. s.
[1455]Glasg. Med. Journ.IV.(1831), pp. 5, 229.
[1456]Cheyne,Dubl. Hosp. Reports,III.(1822), p. 3. At Limerick, from June to September, 1821, there were 47 cases among the men of the 79th regiment.
[1457]Clarke,Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.IV.423.
[1458]A. C. Hutchinson,Statement of the extraordinary sickness at the Penitentiary at Milbank, Lond. 1823; P. M. Latham, M.D.,Account of the Disease lately prevalent at the General Penitentiary. Lond. 1825.
[1459]James Wilson,Glasgow Med. Journ.I.(1828), p. 40.
[1460]James Wilson,Glasgow Med. Journ.I.39; James Brown,ibid.; Macfarlane,I.99; Paterson,I.438; Editors,IV.1; Hume (Hamilton),IV.14, and 229; McDerment (Ayr),IV.19; Macnab (Callander),IV.241.
[1461]Christison, “Notice on the Dysentery which has lately prevailed in the Edinburgh Infirmary.”Edin. Med. Surg. Journ.XXXI.(Jan. 1829), p. 216, and inLife of Sir Robert Christison, “Autobiography,”I.376.
[1462]W. H. Gilby, M.D., “On the Dysentery which occurred in the Wakefield Lunatic Asylum in the years 1826, 1827, 1828 and 1829.”North of Eng. Med. and Surg. Journ.I.(1830-31), 91.
[1463]Hume, “Case of the Edinburgh New Town Epidemic.”Glasgow Med. Journ.IV.229.
[1464]Ibid.IV.7. The following is Buchanan’s reference to it: “The only epidemic fever belonging to the family of diseases we are here considering that occurred in Scotland during thedysentericyears was that of the New Town of Edinburgh, in 1828, of which we have already spoken. As our knowledge of this fever is not derived from any source on which we can certainly rely, it is possible that we may have formed an erroneous opinion respecting it; but from all we have heard of its symptoms and mode of distribution, we are disposed to consider it as totally different in nature from the common fever of this country. The latter circumstance alone, the mode of distribution of the disease, is, we think, perfectly sufficient to demonstrate our proposition. Instead of occupying the Cowgate, the Grassmarket, and the High Street, the usual haunts of typhus, this fever had its head-quarters in Heriot Row and Great King Street; and, according to our information, it extended from the last mentioned street in the direction of the Water of Leith, and from Leith, along the shore, to Musselburgh. We do not vouch for the accuracy of these minute details, but we believe the important fact to be beyond doubt that this fever prevailed chiefly, not in the districts where typhus is invariably to be met with, but in the most fashionable parts of the New Town.”
[1465]James Black, M.D.,Edin. Med. Surg. Journ.XLV.(1836), p. 63. “As the epidemic was ushered in and was accompanied during the half of its course with cholera, fever of a typhous character followed close in its train among the working and lower classes, and continued more or less during the first months of winter, after dysentery had totally disappeared.” The latter had not been seen again down to 1835.
[1466]J. Smith,ibid.XLII.(1833), p. 342.
[1467]Cleland,Trans. Glasg. and Clydesd. Statist. Soc.I.1837.
[1468]Arrott,Edin. Med. Surg. Journ., Jan. 1839, p. 121.
[1469]Farr, inFirst Report of the Registrar-General, 1837-8, p. 103.
[1470]Baly,Pathology and Treatment of Dysentery. London, 1847.
[1471]Moyle,Lond. Med. Gaz.N. S. VII.Dec. 29, 1848, p. 1093.
[1472]Christison, “On a local Epidemic of Dysentery.”Month. Journ. Med. Sc.XVII. (Dec. 1853), 508.
[1473]T. S. Clouston,Med. Times and Gaz.1865, I. 567.
[1474]W. H. Duncan, M.D., “On the recent Introduction of Fever into Liverpool by the crew of an Egyptian frigate.”Trans. Epidemiol. Soc.vol. 1. pt. 2. p. 246. (1 July, 1861).
[1475]James Boyle, surgeon to H. M. S. ‘Minden,’Epidemic Cholera of India, London, 1821; W. B. Carter,Cholera Indica vel Spasmodica, Thesis, Glasgow, 1822; Thomas Brown, of Musselburgh,On Cholera, more especially as it has appeared in British India, Edin. 1824; Whitelaw Ainslie, M.D.,The Cholera Morbus of India, Letter to the Court of Governors, H. E. I. C., Edin. 1825; A. T. Christie, M.D. (of Madras),Obs. on the Nature and Treatment of Cholera, Edin. 1828; Charles Searle (of Madras),Cholera, its Nature, Cause and Treatment, London, 1830 (dated 1st May, instigated, not by the Orenburg epidemic, but by the deaths of Sir Thomas Monro and others from cholera in Madras).
[1476]See extract inGlas. Med. Journ., Feb. 1831, p. 105, fromScottish Mission. and Philan. Reg.
[1477]George Hamilton Bell,Treatise on Cholera Asphyxia or Epidemic Cholera as it appeared in Asia and more recently in Europe, Edin. 1831; Reginald Orton,An Essay on the Epidemic Cholera of India, 2nd. ed. with a supplement, London, 1831 (August); 1st ed. Madras, 1820; H. Young, M.D. (of the Bengal Service),Remarks on the Cholera Morbus, 2nd ed. 1831; Alex. Smith, M.D. (Calcutta),Description of the Spasmodic Cholera(substance of an old report to the Army Medical Board); W. Macmichael, M.D.,Is the Cholera Spasmodica of India a Contagious Disease?London, 1831 (Sept.); T. J. Pettigrew,Obs. on Cholera, comprising a description of the Epidemic Cholera of India, London, 1831 (13 Nov.); John Austin,Cholera Morbus, Indian and Russian Cholera, London, 1831 (July); John Goss, late H. E. I. C. S.,Practical Remarks on the Disease called Cholera, London, 1831 (Nov.); Whitelaw Ainslie,Letters on the Cholera, London, 1832 (from Edinburgh, Dec. 1831); Henry Penneck, M.D.,Nature and Treatment of the Indian Pestilence commonly called Cholera, London, 1831 (Penzance, 24 Nov.); A. P. Wilson Philip,Nature of Malignant Cholera, London, 1832;Official Reports made to Government by Drs Russell and Barry on Cholera Spasmodica observed during the Mission to Russia in 1831, London, 1832; John V. Thompson, Dep. Insp. Gen. of Hosps.The Pestilential Cholera unmasked, Cork, 1832 (January).
[1478]Op. cit.p. 469.
[1479]Lond. Med. Gaz.1831.
[1480]James Hall, “Narrative of an Epidemic English Cholera that appeared on board ships of war lying in ordinary in the River Medway during the Summer and Autumn of 1831.”Edin. Med. Surg. Journ., Feb. 1832, p. 295.
[1481]John Marshall, M.D.,Obs. on Cholera as it appeared at Port Glasgow in July and August, 1831. Illustrated by numerous cases.1831.
[1482]William Dixon,Lond. Med. Gaz.4 Feb. 1832,IX.668.
[1483]Dixon, u. s.
[1484]Kell, p. 22.
[1485]Kell, Dixon, and others; the statements about Henry’s case are contradictory.
[1486]Clanny, p. 19.
[1487]A table of the daily course of the cholera at Sunderland, which I must omit for want of space, is given in the essay by Haslewood and Morbey,History and Medical Treatment of Cholera as it appeared in Sunderland in 1831, London, 1832, p. 151.
[1488]Kell, however, suspected that there were many malignant cases in Monk Wearmouth after the 31st of October, which were not reported. l. c. p. 73.
[1489]Clanny says (p. 42), “At first our epidemic appeared only in certain streets or lanes, namely, the Fish Landing, Long Bank, Silver Street, High Street, Burleigh Street, Mill Hill, Sailors’ Alley, Love Lane, Wood Street, Warren Street; as also in several lanes in Bishopwearmouth, the New Town, Ayre’s Quay, and on the north side of the river in Monkwearmouth, in several of the byelanes near the river.... Generally speaking the disease fixed its residence in such places as medical men could have pointed outà priori.”
[1490]Besides the essay of Haslewood and Morbey, and the paper by Dixon,supra, the following were written on the Sunderland cholera: W. Ainsworth,Obs. on the Pestilential Cholera at Sunderland, London, 1832; John Butler Kell, surgeon to the 82nd Regt.,Cholera at Sunderland in 1831, Edin. 1834; W. Reid Clanny, M.D., (chairman of the Local Board of Health),Hyperanthraxis, or the Cholera of Sunderland, Lond. 1832; Emile Dubuc,Rapport sur le Cholera Morbus à Sunderland, Newcastle, etc.Rouen, 1832.
[1491]Ainsworth, p. 164, u. s., says: “Dennis Mc Gwin, who took the disease to North Shields, came from Sunderland. The first case in South Shields was a boy from Gateshead. A pedler woman took it to Houghton, a traveller to Morpeth, and I have no doubt its arrival could similarly be traced to Durham, Haddington and Tranent, all towns on the same high road. A wanderer also perished of the disease at Doncaster; but luckily there were no other cases.”
[1492]T. M. Greenhow, M.D.,Cholera as it has recently appeared in the Towns of Newcastle and Gateshead, including Cases, London, 1832; Thomas Mollison, M.D.,Remarks on the epidemic Disease called Cholera, as it occurred in Newcastle, Edin. 1832. (He arrived at Newcastle from Edinburgh on the 21st Dec. and remained eleven days.)
[1493]In Greenhow, u. s.
[1494]Craigie,Edin. Med. Surg. Journ.XXXVII.337.
[1495]John Douglas, M.D., “History of the Epidemic Cholera of Hawick,” inCholera Gazette, no. 6, April 7, p. 234.
[1496]Chiefly from the paper by Professor George Watt,Glas. Med. Journ.v. 298, 384; see also Bryce,ibid.262.
[1497]W. Auchincloss, M.D., “Report of the Epidemic Cholera as it appeared in the Town’s Hospital of Glasgow in February and March, 1832,”Glas. Med. Journ.v. 113.
[1498]James Cleland, LL.D., and James Corkindale, M.D.,Edin. Med. Surg. Journ.XXXIX.503.
[1499]J. Adair Lawrie, M.D., “Report of the Albion Street Cholera Hospital.”Glas. Med. Journ.V.309, 416.
[1500]Month. Journ. Med. Sc.March, 1850, p. 302.
[1501]Wood,Glas. Med. Journ.VI.1833.
[1502]Grieve,Month. Journ. Med. Sc.IX.1849, p. 777.
[1503]Scott,Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.XXXIX.276. For a whole month it was confined to one suburb. All the earlier cases were without exception fatal. There were 130 cases and 65 deaths.
[1504]It is probably to Portmahomak or Inver that Howison refers in the following (Lancet, 10 Nov. 1832, p. 203): Cholera broke out in a small village several miles from Tain, and in a few days it carried off 41 out of a population of 120 to 140. Coffins could not be made fast enough. Many were buried in sailcloth. The people fled from their houses to the fields.
[1505]Hugh Miller,My Schools and Schoolmasters, Chap.XXII.
[1506]The good account by Paterson, “Observations on Cholera as it appeared at Collieston and Footdee,”Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.XLIX.(1838), p. 408, shows how much panic a mortality of nine stood for.
[1507]Sir J. Y. Simpson gave to Dr Graves of Dublin a list of some places in Scotland where cholera had appeared, which contains the additional names of Helmsdale (23 July), Fort William (24 Sept.), Fort George (7 May), Islay (23 Oct.), Portpatrick (7 Aug.), Crieff (2 Oct.), and Kelso (29 Oct.).
[1508]Dubl. Journ. Med. Sc.III.74.
[1509]Times, 1 July, 1832.
[1510]Simon McCoy, “Notes on Malignant Cholera as it appeared in Dublin,”Dub. Journ. Med. Sc.II.357, andIII.1.
[1511]Compare Grimshaw’s observations on the admissions for fever to the Cork Street Hospital in the summer of 1864,supra, p. 298.
[1512]Wilde,Census of Ireland 1841. Table of Deaths, p. xxi.
[1513]Gent. Magaz.1832, June, p. 555;Annual Register, 1832, Chronicle (June), p. 71.
[1514]Graves,Dubl. Quart. Journ. Med. Sc.Feb. 1849, p. 31, from information by Dr Little of Sligo.
[1515]W. Howison, M.D., of Edinburgh,Lancet, 10 Nov. 1832, p. 203. He was at Londonderry in August, and had probably heard the reports of the Sligo cholera there.
[1516]John Colvan, M.D.,Dubl. Journ. Med. Sc.IV.186. These five deaths in Armagh County in 1833 do not appear in the table.
[1517]Graves, u. s. 1849,VII.246.
[1518]Roupell,Croomian Lectures on Cholera, Lond. 1833, p. 33, gives the suspicious case of a man named Webster, who sailed from Sunderland on 20 Jan. and arrived in the Thames about the 30th. “The vessel immediately obtainedpratique; but a few days after, this man was seized with extreme pain in the epigastrium” &c. and died suddenly after symptoms in part those of cholera. Postmortem, 20 oz. of blood were found in the peritoneum, and some blood in the lower part of the bowel.
[1519]The populous parishes of the Black Country around Wolverhampton came under notice in another way in 1832 as a crucial instance in the redistribution of seats by the Reform Act.
[1520]T. Ogier Ward, “Cholera in Wolverhampton in Aug.-Oct. 1832,”Trans. Prov. Med. and Surg. Assoc.II.368.
[1521]Rev. W. Leigh,An authentic narrative of the awful visitation of Bilston by Cholera in Aug.-Sept. 1832. Wolverhampton, 1833.
[1522]Rev. C. Girdlestone,Seven Sermons preached during the prevalence of the Cholera in the parish of Sedgley, with a narrative of that visitation. London, 1833.
[1523]T. Ogier Ward, u. s., p. 376.
[1524]James Collins, M.D.,Lond. Med. Gaz.30 June, 1832, p. 412; and report by Thompson, surgeon of the ‘Brutus,’ in theCholera Gazette, s. d.
[1525]Henry Gaulter, M.D.,The Origin and Progress of the Malignant Cholera in Manchester. London, 1833, p. 113.
[1526]The first case was of a coach-painter, who had had frequent attacks of painter’s colic. Opposite his house was a large stable dunghill in a very foetid state. On the evening of the 16th May he had eaten a heavy supper of lambs’ fry, and had been ill thereafter, the symptoms becoming those of Asiatic cholera on the night of the 18th, death ensuing at 2 p.m. 20th.
[1527]In the hamlet adjoining a cotton-mill at Hinds, near Bury, consisting of thirty cottages in a row between the mill lade and the canal, wretchedly built, without chimneys, with windows that would not open, the inmates sleeping four or five in a bed, there were 32 cases of cholera with 7 deaths, but none of these were in persons who worked in the mill. Gaulter, u. s. citing Goodlad. He cites also Flint, of Stockport, for the rarity of attacks among the mill workers in that town. See also Samuel Gaskell, “Malignant Cholera in Manchester,”Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.XL.52. The microbic theory, or, as it was then called by Sir Henry Holland and others, the “hypothesis of insect life,” was happily thought of by a working cotton-spinner in Manchester to explain the immunity of the mill-workers in 1832. Gaulter (u. s. p. 120) gives in correct English what would probably have been said in the vernacular as follows: “I’ve been thinkin’, Maister,” said a spinner to Mr Sowden, millowner, “as how th’ cholery comes o’ hinsecks that smo’ as we corn’d see ’em, an’ they corn’d live i’ factories for th’ ’eät and th’ ile. Me an’ my mates wor speakin’ o’t last neet, an’ we o’ on us thowt th’ saäm thing.” Hahnemann, cited by theTimes, 17 July, 1831, believed that the cholera insect escaped from the eye, and fastened upon the hair, skin, clothes, &c. of other persons. The common microscopic objects uniformly found in the choleraic discharges by later observers have been vibrios, of which half-a-dozen, or perhaps a dozen, varieties have been distinguished. One of these was somewhat audaciously named the “cholera germ” or “comma bacillus of cholera” by Dr R. Koch, who went to Calcutta in 1884. All vibrios, which have a corkscrew form when in motion, are apt to assume the comma form when at rest.
[1528]Times, Sept. 5, 1832.
[1529]John Addington Symonds, “Progress and Causes of Cholera in Bristol, 1832.”Trans. Prov. Med. Surg. Assoc.III.170.
[1530]Some cases were detailed by Edward Blackman, M.D.,Lond. Med. Gaz.1832, pp. 473, 546.
[1531]Thomas Shapter, M.D.,The History of the Cholera in Exeter in 1832. London, 1849, pp. 297.
[1532]Besides the papers or books already cited, accounts were published for the following places: Warrington, by Mr Glazebrook, secretary to the Local Board of Health; Oxford, by Rev. V. Thomas; Hull, by James Alderson, M.D.; Kendal, by Thomas Proudfoot, M.D. (Edin. Med. and Surg. J.XXXIX.85); various places by J. Y. Simpson, M.D. (ibid.XLIX.358); Tynemouth, by E. H. Greenhow, M.D. (Trans. Epid. Soc.1861); London, by Halma-Grand (Relationetc. Paris, 1832), and by Gaselee and Tweedie (Lond. 1832). There are also various minor notices: for Whittlesea (Lond. Med. Gaz.I.1832, p. 448), Hutton, Yorkshire (ibid.II.1832, p. 316), York (Lancet, 13 Oct. 1832, p. 72), Cheltenham, showing how it was kept free (ibid.Nov. 10, p. 210), St Heliers, Jersey (Lond. Med. Surg. J.II.359), Derby (ibid.11. 383).
[1533]The daily mortality in Paris at the beginning of the epidemic was as follows (Annual Register, 1832, p. 318):
To the 16th of April the deaths were about 8700; before the end of the month the total was nearly doubled. As the whole cholera mortality of Paris in 1832 was about 19,000, April must have had much the greater part of it.
[1534]Proudfoot,Edin. Med. and Surg. Journ.XXXIX.99.
[1535]Graves, who was a strong contagionist (l. c. 1848-49), cites the instances of nuns, nurses and porters at Tuam, and of medical men at Sligo.
[1536]G. D. Dermott, lecturer in Anatomy and Surgery,Lond. Med. and Surg. Journ.1832, p. 274.
[1537]John Parkin, surgeon H.E.I.C.S., “Cause, Nature and Treatment of Cholera.”Lond. Med. and Surg. Journ.1 Sept. 1832.
[1538]Graves,Clinical Medicine, 1843, p. 700: “I could bring forward the names of many medical men in Dublin whose lives, I am happy to say, were saved by the use of this remedy.”