RELATIONSHIPS

Hyla pachydermaTaylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28:308-310, pl. 27, figs. 1-4, November 12, 1942 [Holotype.—USNM 115029 from Pan de Olla, Veracruz, south of Tezuitlán, Puebla, México; Hobart M. Smith collector]. Taylor and Smith, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 95:588, June 30, 1945. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull, 33:350, March 20, 1950. Rabb and Mosimann, Occ. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7-8, March 29, 1955.

Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males 40 mm.; snout in dorsal profile round; tarsal fold strong; inner metatarsal tubercle round and moderate in size; outer metatarsal tubercle small and indistinct; webbing on foot extending to middle of penultimate phalanx of fourth toe; nuptial spines on thumb large; thoracic fold present; anal opening at level of middle of thighs; dorsum dull grayish brown with scattered indistinct dark flecks; venter cream-color mottled with brown on throat and chest; flanks grayish brown with cream-colored reticulations; anal stripe distinct, creamy white, sometimes extending outward on thighs; white spots or line below anus; vocal slits absent.Description.—The following description is based on USNM 115028 from Pan de Olla, Veracruz. Adult male having a snout-vent length of 39.9 mm.; tibia length, 21.0 mm., 52.6 per cent of snout-vent length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of longest toe), 20.5 mm.; greatest width of head, 12.8 mm., 32.1 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 12.3 mm., 30.8 per cent of snout-vent length. Snout short, in lateral profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile rounded; canthus rounded; loreal region slightly concave; lips thick, round, and not flaring; nostrils slightly protuberant; internarial distance, 2.7 mm.; interorbital distance, 3.7 mm., somewhat broader than eyelid, 2.9 mm. A heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye above tympanic region and then to insertion of forearm; tympanum completely concealed. Forearm moderately robust; distinct fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing cluster of moderate-sized, horny, nuptial spines continuous on edge of digit; row of spines present on second finger; subarticular tubercles round, small proximally and slightly larger distally; supernumerary tubercles small and indistinct; three palmar tubercles, median and outer partly fused; fingers long, moderately slender; discs moderately large; length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; second and fourth fingers subequal in length; webbing between fingers rudimentary. Heels overlap by about one-fourth length of shank when hind limbs adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extends to anterior edge of eye; tarsal fold thick, low, extending nearly to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle moderately large and round; outer metatarsal tubercle small and indistinct; subarticular tubercles small and round;supernumerary tubercles small, present on proximal segments of digits; toes moderately long and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4; third and fifth toes subequal in length; toes about three-fourths webbed; web extending to middle of penultimate phalanx of fourth toe; discs rather small, about two-thirds size of those on fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally at level of middle of thighs; anal flap slightly elongate; thick, transverse dermal fold above anus. Skin of dorsum and ventral surfaces of limbs, except thighs, smooth; skin of chin, belly, and ventral surfaces of thighs granular; thoracic fold present. Tongue nearly round, slightly notched behind, and barely free posteriorly; vomerine teeth 3-3, situated on posteroventral edges of small, transverse vomerine ridges between rather large triangular inner nares; no vocal slits.Color (in alcohol) of dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs dull grayish brown with indistinct scattered darker flecks; flanks grayish brown with cream-colored reticulations; posterior surfaces of thighs tan; chin cream-color, mottled with brown; belly creamy yellow; anal stripe cream-color.Variation.—In addition to the specimen described above three others are known. One is a juvenile having a snout-vent length of 29.5 mm., and two are females having snout-vent lengths of 46.9 and 41.6 mm. Variation in structure and coloration between the four specimens is slight. In the females the tympani are partly visible and are about one-third the diameter of the eye; the chest is mottled with brown; the anal stripe extends laterally in the form of a row of cream-colored dashes and spots onto the posterodorsal surfaces of the thighs.

Description.—The following description is based on USNM 115028 from Pan de Olla, Veracruz. Adult male having a snout-vent length of 39.9 mm.; tibia length, 21.0 mm., 52.6 per cent of snout-vent length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of longest toe), 20.5 mm.; greatest width of head, 12.8 mm., 32.1 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 12.3 mm., 30.8 per cent of snout-vent length. Snout short, in lateral profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile rounded; canthus rounded; loreal region slightly concave; lips thick, round, and not flaring; nostrils slightly protuberant; internarial distance, 2.7 mm.; interorbital distance, 3.7 mm., somewhat broader than eyelid, 2.9 mm. A heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye above tympanic region and then to insertion of forearm; tympanum completely concealed. Forearm moderately robust; distinct fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing cluster of moderate-sized, horny, nuptial spines continuous on edge of digit; row of spines present on second finger; subarticular tubercles round, small proximally and slightly larger distally; supernumerary tubercles small and indistinct; three palmar tubercles, median and outer partly fused; fingers long, moderately slender; discs moderately large; length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; second and fourth fingers subequal in length; webbing between fingers rudimentary. Heels overlap by about one-fourth length of shank when hind limbs adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extends to anterior edge of eye; tarsal fold thick, low, extending nearly to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle moderately large and round; outer metatarsal tubercle small and indistinct; subarticular tubercles small and round;supernumerary tubercles small, present on proximal segments of digits; toes moderately long and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4; third and fifth toes subequal in length; toes about three-fourths webbed; web extending to middle of penultimate phalanx of fourth toe; discs rather small, about two-thirds size of those on fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally at level of middle of thighs; anal flap slightly elongate; thick, transverse dermal fold above anus. Skin of dorsum and ventral surfaces of limbs, except thighs, smooth; skin of chin, belly, and ventral surfaces of thighs granular; thoracic fold present. Tongue nearly round, slightly notched behind, and barely free posteriorly; vomerine teeth 3-3, situated on posteroventral edges of small, transverse vomerine ridges between rather large triangular inner nares; no vocal slits.

Color (in alcohol) of dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs dull grayish brown with indistinct scattered darker flecks; flanks grayish brown with cream-colored reticulations; posterior surfaces of thighs tan; chin cream-color, mottled with brown; belly creamy yellow; anal stripe cream-color.

Variation.—In addition to the specimen described above three others are known. One is a juvenile having a snout-vent length of 29.5 mm., and two are females having snout-vent lengths of 46.9 and 41.6 mm. Variation in structure and coloration between the four specimens is slight. In the females the tympani are partly visible and are about one-third the diameter of the eye; the chest is mottled with brown; the anal stripe extends laterally in the form of a row of cream-colored dashes and spots onto the posterodorsal surfaces of the thighs.

Remarks.—On the basis of the four specimens available for study,Hyla pachydermaseems to be closely related toHyla crassaandHyla robertsorum. In theHyla bistinctagroup,Hyla pachydermais unique in having enlarged nuptial spines.

Taylor and Smith (1945:588) stated that the frogs were found on bushes and weeds beside a small, bounding stream near Pan de Olla. I have searched unsuccessfully for this species in the area around Pan de Olla and Tezuitlán.

Distribution.—This species is known only from a stream at an elevation of about 1600 meters on the Atlantic slopes of the Sierra Madre Oriental in central Veracruz (Fig. 4).Specimens examined.—Veracruz: Pan de Olla, south of Tezuitlán, Puebla, USNM 115026-9.

Distribution.—This species is known only from a stream at an elevation of about 1600 meters on the Atlantic slopes of the Sierra Madre Oriental in central Veracruz (Fig. 4).

Specimens examined.—Veracruz: Pan de Olla, south of Tezuitlán, Puebla, USNM 115026-9.

Hyla crassa(Brocchi)

Cauphias crassusBrocchi, Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, 1:130, 1877 [Holotype.—MNHN 6331 from "Mexico;" Adolphe Boucard collector].Cauphias crassumBrocchi, Études des batraciens de l'Amérique Centrale, p. 64, pl. 12, fig. 4, 1882. Díaz de León, Indice de los batracios que se encuentran en la República Mexicana, p. 21, June, 1904. Kellogg, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 160:118-120, March 31, 1932. Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:392, November 15, 1940. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7, March 29, 1955.Hyla crassa, Boulenger, Catalogue Batrachia Salientia, 2nd. Ed., p. 396, February 1, 1882. Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia and Batrachia, p. 281, September, 1901. Nieden, Das Tierreich, Amphibia,Anura 1, p. 248, June, 1923. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1437:20, December 7, 1949.Hypsiboas crassus, Cope, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:14, 1887.Hyla robustofemoraTaylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:389-393, figs. 3-4, November 27, 1940 [Holotype.—UIMNH 25050 (formerly EHT-HMS 16314) from Cerro San Felipe, 15 kilometers northeast of Oaxaca, Oaxaca, México; Edward H. Taylor collector]; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28:310, November 15, 1942. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1437:20, December 7, 1949. Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33:339, March 20, 1950. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7, March 29, 1955.Plectrohyla crassa, Hartweg, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 437:1, June 30, 1941. Stuart, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 455:6, January 5, 1942.

Cauphias crassusBrocchi, Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, 1:130, 1877 [Holotype.—MNHN 6331 from "Mexico;" Adolphe Boucard collector].

Cauphias crassumBrocchi, Études des batraciens de l'Amérique Centrale, p. 64, pl. 12, fig. 4, 1882. Díaz de León, Indice de los batracios que se encuentran en la República Mexicana, p. 21, June, 1904. Kellogg, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 160:118-120, March 31, 1932. Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:392, November 15, 1940. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7, March 29, 1955.

Hyla crassa, Boulenger, Catalogue Batrachia Salientia, 2nd. Ed., p. 396, February 1, 1882. Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia and Batrachia, p. 281, September, 1901. Nieden, Das Tierreich, Amphibia,Anura 1, p. 248, June, 1923. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1437:20, December 7, 1949.

Hypsiboas crassus, Cope, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:14, 1887.

Hyla robustofemoraTaylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:389-393, figs. 3-4, November 27, 1940 [Holotype.—UIMNH 25050 (formerly EHT-HMS 16314) from Cerro San Felipe, 15 kilometers northeast of Oaxaca, Oaxaca, México; Edward H. Taylor collector]; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28:310, November 15, 1942. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1437:20, December 7, 1949. Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33:339, March 20, 1950. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7, March 29, 1955.

Plectrohyla crassa, Hartweg, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 437:1, June 30, 1941. Stuart, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 455:6, January 5, 1942.

Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males 54 mm.; snout in dorsal profile round; tarsal fold strong; inner metatarsal tubercle small and elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle small, flat, and indistinct; foot fully webbed; nuptial spines on thumb small; thoracic fold absent; anal opening at level of middle of femur; dorsum dull olive-green; belly creamy yellow; chin gray with yellow flecks; flanks dull olive-green with scattered cream-colored spots; and stripe faint, cream-color; vocal slits absent.Description.—The following description is based on UIMNH 25050 from Cerro San Felipe, Oaxaca. Adult male having a snout-vent length of 53.7 mm.; tibia length, 26.9 mm., 50.1 per cent of snout-vent length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of longest toe), 25.4 mm.; greatest width of head, 17.6 mm., 32.8 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 16.0 mm., 29.8 per cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 5.4 mm.; diameter of tympanum, 1.5 mm., 27.8 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout short, in lateral profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile broadly round; canthus absent; loreal region nearly flat; lips thick and not flaring; nostrils barely protuberant; internarial distance, 3.8 mm.; interorbital distance, 4.7 mm., somewhat broader than width of eyelid, 3.8 mm. Heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye above tympanum and then to insertion of forearm; tympanum concealed above, its diameter about equal to its distance from eye. Forearm thick; distinct fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing patch of small nuptial spines continuous on side of digit; similar patch on second finger; subarticular tubercles small and round, none bifid; few supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of digits; large, flat palmar tubercle; fingers long and slender; length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; discs moderately large; rudimentary web between second and third fingers and between third and fourth. Legs thick; heels overlap by about one-fourth length of shank when hindlimbs adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extends to posterior corner of eye; tarsal fold thick, extending to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle small and elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle small, flat, and indistinct; subarticular tubercles small and round; single row of supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of each digit; toes moderately short and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4; toes fully webbed; flap of skin on inner surface of first toe; discs about same size as those on fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally at middle of thighs; anal sheath moderately elongate; small tubercles below anal opening. Skin of dorsum rather smooth, somewhatgranular on dorsal surfaces of limbs; skin of chin and belly moderately granular; that of posterior surfaces of thighs smooth; no thoracic fold. Tongue nearly round, shallowly notched posteriorly, and free for about one-fourth its length; vomerine teeth 5-5, situated on rounded ridges between small inner nares; no vocal slits.Color (in alcohol) dull olive-green on dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs; flanks dull olive-green with scattered cream-colored spots; posterior surfaces of thighs grayish brown with faint creamy mottling; chin gray with cream-colored spots; belly creamy yellow, suffused with gray posteriorly; undersides of feet and webbing gray; anal stripe faint, pale cream-color.Variation.—The only other known specimen (MNHN 6331) is a female having a snout-vent length of 53.7 mm. and resembling the specimen described above in most details of morphology. In MNHN 6331 the tympanum is completely concealed, and the 8-7 vomerine teeth are arranged in two irregular rows. The female has more cream-colored mottling on the flanks and posterior surfaces of the thighs and more distinct mottling on the throat than the male described above.

Description.—The following description is based on UIMNH 25050 from Cerro San Felipe, Oaxaca. Adult male having a snout-vent length of 53.7 mm.; tibia length, 26.9 mm., 50.1 per cent of snout-vent length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of longest toe), 25.4 mm.; greatest width of head, 17.6 mm., 32.8 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 16.0 mm., 29.8 per cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 5.4 mm.; diameter of tympanum, 1.5 mm., 27.8 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout short, in lateral profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile broadly round; canthus absent; loreal region nearly flat; lips thick and not flaring; nostrils barely protuberant; internarial distance, 3.8 mm.; interorbital distance, 4.7 mm., somewhat broader than width of eyelid, 3.8 mm. Heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye above tympanum and then to insertion of forearm; tympanum concealed above, its diameter about equal to its distance from eye. Forearm thick; distinct fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing patch of small nuptial spines continuous on side of digit; similar patch on second finger; subarticular tubercles small and round, none bifid; few supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of digits; large, flat palmar tubercle; fingers long and slender; length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; discs moderately large; rudimentary web between second and third fingers and between third and fourth. Legs thick; heels overlap by about one-fourth length of shank when hindlimbs adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extends to posterior corner of eye; tarsal fold thick, extending to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle small and elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle small, flat, and indistinct; subarticular tubercles small and round; single row of supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of each digit; toes moderately short and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4; toes fully webbed; flap of skin on inner surface of first toe; discs about same size as those on fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally at middle of thighs; anal sheath moderately elongate; small tubercles below anal opening. Skin of dorsum rather smooth, somewhatgranular on dorsal surfaces of limbs; skin of chin and belly moderately granular; that of posterior surfaces of thighs smooth; no thoracic fold. Tongue nearly round, shallowly notched posteriorly, and free for about one-fourth its length; vomerine teeth 5-5, situated on rounded ridges between small inner nares; no vocal slits.

Color (in alcohol) dull olive-green on dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs; flanks dull olive-green with scattered cream-colored spots; posterior surfaces of thighs grayish brown with faint creamy mottling; chin gray with cream-colored spots; belly creamy yellow, suffused with gray posteriorly; undersides of feet and webbing gray; anal stripe faint, pale cream-color.

Variation.—The only other known specimen (MNHN 6331) is a female having a snout-vent length of 53.7 mm. and resembling the specimen described above in most details of morphology. In MNHN 6331 the tympanum is completely concealed, and the 8-7 vomerine teeth are arranged in two irregular rows. The female has more cream-colored mottling on the flanks and posterior surfaces of the thighs and more distinct mottling on the throat than the male described above.

Remarks.—The systematic status ofCauphias crassusBrocchi has been in doubt since the time of the original description. Brocchi (1877:130) stated: "Les dernieres phalanges sont obtuses, tronqués a leur extrémité antérieure." Brocchi placed the species in his genusCauphias(type species,C. guatemalensis), which he considered to be related toHylodes( =Eleutherodactylusin the sense used by Brocchi); he thereby placedCauphiasin his Hylodidae ( = Leptodactylidae, in part). This idea of relationships was perpetuated by Barbour (1927:96), who reported on the second known specimen ofCauphias guatemalensisand stated: "When I dissected the sternum I was at once struck by its similarity to Noble's figures of transitional types between arciferal and firmisternal forms. TheCauphiassternum recalls some of his figures forSminthillusandEleutherodactylus. This genus is probably most closely related to the latter and has probably become highly modified to meet some peculiar environmental condition or on account of some specialized habits as yet unknown." Kellogg (1932:118) placedCauphiasin the Leptodactylidae and stated that the terminal phalanges are T-shaped. Hartweg (1941:1) consideredPlectrohylato be the correct generic name forCauphias guatemalensis; he thereby relegatedCauphiasto the synonomy ofPlectrohyla. Hartweg (1941:9) further showed that the terminal phalanges ofPlectrohyla guatemalensiswere not T-shaped and that intercalary cartilages were present. Thus, he correctly concluded thatPlectrohyla guatemalensis(andP. crassaby implication) was a member of the family Hylidae. Stuart (1942:6) followed Hartweg's allocations and further suggested thatPlectrohyla crassamight be the same species asHylarobustofemoraTaylor. In his description ofH. robustofemoraTaylor (1940:392), who had not examined the type ofCauphias crassus, stated that were it not for the statements of Brocchi and Kellogg thatC. crassushas T-shaped terminal phalanges, "I might suspect I had before me a specimen ofCauphiasclosely related tocrassum."

I have compared the type ofCauphias crassuswith that ofHyla robustofemora. With the exception of the minor differences mentioned in the preceding section on variation, the specimens are alike, leaving little doubt that they represent the same species. The statements of Brocchi and Kellogg to the contrary, the type ofCauphias crassuspossesses intercalary cartilages between the penultimate and terminal phalanges; the latter are not T-shaped, but as in the type ofHyla robustofemora, resemble those typical ofHyla. On the basis of the morphological characters, as pointed out forHyla robustofemoraby Taylor (1940:392),Hyla crassais a member of theHyla bistinctagroup.

Distribution.—This species is definitely known only from a small stream at an elevation of 2300 meters in the mountains of central Oaxaca (Fig. 4).Specimens examined.—Oaxaca: Cerro San Felipe, UIMNH 25050. "Mexico," MNHN 6331.

Distribution.—This species is definitely known only from a small stream at an elevation of 2300 meters in the mountains of central Oaxaca (Fig. 4).

Specimens examined.—Oaxaca: Cerro San Felipe, UIMNH 25050. "Mexico," MNHN 6331.

The evolutionary trend in the members of theHyla bistinctagroup is towards aquatic habits.Hyla bistincta, the least specialized species in the group, has relatively short fingers, webbing between the fingers, a truncate, high snout, and relatively large subarticular and supernumerary tubercles.Hyla charadricolaresemblesbistinctain having relatively short fingers, a slight amount of webbing, and a truncate snout. Apparently these two species are more closely related to one another than either is to the other species in the group.Hyla robertsorum,pachyderma, andcrassaare the most aquatic members of the group. These species are closely related, possibly conspecific. All have round, sloping snouts, robust forearms, long, unwebbed fingers, and large webbed feet. BothH. pachydermaandH. crassaseem to be advanced beyondH. robertsorum. If small nuptial spines, moderately webbed feet, and absence of a well-defined thoracic fold are considered to be less advanced than large nuptial spines and a strong thoracic fold, as inH. pachyderma, or fully webbed feet, as inH. crassa, thenH. robertsorummust be considered to be less advanced thanH. pachydermaorH. crassa.

Members of theHyla bistinctagroup inhabit mountain streams.The frogs can be found along these streams throughout the year. Since in most stream-breeding hylids there is no migration to breeding sites, the breeding call does not function to attract females to the breeding site. Apparently voices are lacking in all members of theHyla bistinctagroup, except inHyla bistincta. The presence of vocal slits and the ability to call further indicate thatHyla bistinctais the primitive member of this group.

Members of theHyla bistinctagroup and the species ofPlectrohylaclosely resemble each other in osteology and body form of the adults and in structure of the tadpoles. This resemblance suggests a close relationship between the two groups.Plectrohylaapparently evolved from an ancestral stock resembling the extantHyla bistincta. Probably this stock gave rise independently toPlectrohylaand to theHyla robertsorum-pachyderma-crassacomplex. In the former the voice was retained, and a projecting prepollex spine developed, whereas in the latter the voice was lost, and the prepollex spine did not project.Plectrohylalives in mountain streams in the Chiapan-Guatemalan highlands; theHyla robertsorum-pachyderma-crassacomplex inhabits similar environments in the Sierra Madre Oriental in México.Hyla charadricolaalso lives in the Sierra Madre Oriental, whereasHyla bistinctais widespread in the mountains of México southeastward to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.

Barbour, T.

1927.Cauphiasrediscovered. Copeia, no. 165:96-98, December 23.

Brocchi, P.

1877. Note sur quelques batraciens hylaeformes recueillis au Mexique et au Guatemala. Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, 1 (3):122-132.

Duellman, W. E.

1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Michoacán, México. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 15:1-148, pls. 1-6, December 20.

Hartweg, N.

1941. Notes on the genusPlectrohyla, with descriptions of new species. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 437:1-10, pl. 1, June 30.

Kellogg, R.

1932. Mexican tailless amphibians in the United States National Museum. Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 160:iv + 224 pp., pl. 1, March 31.

Rabb, G. B.andMosimann, J. E.

1955. The tadpole ofHyla robertsorum, with comments on the affinities of the species. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:1-9, March 29.

Shannon, F. A.

1951. Notes on a herpetological collection from Oaxaca and other localities in Mexico. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 101:465-484, May 17.

Stuart, L. C.

1942. Descriptions of two new species ofPlectrohylaBrocchi, with comments on several forms of tadpoles. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 455:1-14, January 5.

Taylor, E. H.

1940. New species of Mexican Anura. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 41:385-405, November 27.1948. A new hylid frog from eastern Mexico. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1:259-262, August 16.1949. A new hylid frog from central Veracruz. Copeia, 1949 (4):272-274, pl. 1, December 15.

1940. New species of Mexican Anura. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 41:385-405, November 27.

1948. A new hylid frog from eastern Mexico. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1:259-262, August 16.

1949. A new hylid frog from central Veracruz. Copeia, 1949 (4):272-274, pl. 1, December 15.

Taylor, E. H.andSmith, H. M.

1945. Summary of the collections of amphibians made in México under the Walter Rathbone Bacon Traveling Scholarship. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 95:521-613, pls. 18-32, June 30.

Transmitted June 24, 1963.

Back to Index Next