Chapter 23

Fig. 33.Argand burner detailsFig. 34.Argand burner details

Fig. 33.Argand burner details

Fig. 33.

Fig. 34.Argand burner details

Fig. 34.

Fig. 35.Argand burner detailsFig. 36.Argand burner details

Fig. 35.Argand burner details

Fig. 35.

Fig. 36.Argand burner details

Fig. 36.

An important point in the economy of the Argand lamp, is the level at which the outlet for the oil, in its passage from the fountain to the burner, should be cut. The cutting of this hole (generally calledtheflow-hole) in the pipe is termed theFlowing of the Lamp.flowingof the lamp, and is commonly done by successive trials, until the oil stands at the proper level of the burner, before the wick is put in. A more ready and accurate method of accomplishing this object and at once determining the level at which theflow-holeshould be cut, was introduced by MrJames Murdoch, the Foreman of Lightroom Repairs to the Scotch Board, and is generally employed in the Northern Lighthouses. Its nature will be readily understood by a reference to the accompanying diagram,No. 37:

Fig. 37.Working of oil outlet

Fig. 37.

Thehatchedsurface represents a metallic ruler, with a spirit-level at L; C is the cup in which the bottom of the fountainf(shewn in dotted lines) rests. When the fountain is removed, and the ruler rests on the edge of the cup C, the screw at A is used to adjust the level at L; and a gauge GG is allowed to fall until a notch in it atx′rests on the outer tube of the burner F; the pinching-screw B retains this ruler in its place, and the pointx′indicates the level at which the oil should stand in the burner. The level linex′ xindicates the level on which the top of theflow-holeH should be cut in the fountain-tube, which is shewn in dotted lines within the outer tube, orbodyof the lamp. In other words,y′ x′measures the level at which the oil should stand in the burnerbelowthe lower edge of the metallic ruler, while the corresponding liney x, at the opposite end, shews the level of the top of theflow-holeH, below the edge of the cup C. The gauge GG applied to that point of the fountain which coincides with the edge of the cup (so thaty′coincides withy) measures the lengthyx=y′ x′; and aset-squareapplied atxgives the position of H on the fountain-tube. The round dot atashews the position of the air-hole in the body of the lamp, which establishes a connection between the external air and the surface of the oil. The rods SS′ shew the sliding gear (described asdandf,page 221), and are only introduced to identify this diagram with those of the fountain and burner which have preceded it.

The most advantageous level of the flow-hole depends on many circumstances too obscure and complicated to admit of any systematic elucidation; and it is enough for all practical purposes, to know that the capillary powers of the wick, and the greater or less viscidity of the oil, are the chief circumstances which determine that level. Actual experience is the only sure guide to the best practice in this respect; and I therefore content myself with stating, that it is generally found that the sperm oil should stand in the empty burner at about ³⁄₈ inch below its top. For colza oil ²⁄₈ inch is sufficient. In summer, owing to the oil being more fluid, there is sometimes a tendency to overflow the burner; but any inconvenience arising from it is avoided by the plan adopted in the Northern Lights, of shutting off the oil (by means of the apparatus already alluded to onp. 222) about fifteen minutes before extinguishing the lights in the morning.

Fig. 38.Oil cut-off

Fig. 38.

The arrangement for cutting off the oil is very simple, as will be seen from the annexed diagram (fig. 38), in which F is the fountain, T the oil-tube leading to the burner, and V theflow-hole, with its sliding valve. By turning the handle H one quadrant of the circle, the whole fountain F and tube T turn round their vertical axis, while the valve V, which rests in a notch in the cup of the lamp, remains still, and sliding over T, opens theflow-hole. S is the screw-plug which retains the oil in the fountain, and which is unscrewed and removed when the fountain is to be filled.

Fig. 39.Burner adjustment apparatus

Fig. 39.

Fig. 40.Burner adjustment apparatus

Fig. 40.

Placing the Lamp in the Focus.In the reflecting apparatus of the Northern Lighthouses, the focal position of the lamp is not, as we have already seen, liable to derangement, by the removal of the burner for the purpose of cleaning, as the sliding gear described atp. 221insures the return of the lamp to its true place. The burner is originally set by means of a gauge, which touches four points of the mirror’s surface (one of them being its vertex, and the other three in the vertical plane of its greatest double ordinate). This gauge being provided with a short tube or collar properly placed for the purpose of receiving the burner, at once verifies its true position, both vertical and horizontal. Thediagrams 39and40shew the nature of the apparatus for adjusting the burners, the one being a plan and the other a section. The four points which touch the curve are onegat the vertex, two in the same horizontal plane with the focus, and near the edge of the mirror at PP, andthe fourth, also near the edge, and in the same vertical plane with the focus. F is the focus. The horizontal arms are graduated, and fitted with sliding pieces and clamping screws at R, so as to admit of being varied with the width of the mirror; but each gauge applies only to curves of the same focal distance; the distance Fgbeing fixed. The gauge, when applied to the mirror, is properly secured by the screws at R, R, and R′; and the burner which is attached to the oil-tube in a temporary manner at A, is raised into the interior of the mirror. If the tube of the burner ascends into the circular tube at F until (when fixed by the checking handle already noticed atp. 221) its upper edge just touches a narrow projection inside the tube F (so placed that the rim of the burner should just touch it when it is on the level required for putting the brightest part of the flame in the focus), then the burner is in the proper position; but if, on the one hand, the axis of the burner stands beyond F, at some point between it and N (which lies in the plane of the mirror’s edge), the bent tube O from the fountain must be shortened at A; and if it rise too high, that tube must be bent down (andvice versa), until, by successive trials, it shall exactly fit into the tube F, and stand at the proper level. A skilful workman soon comes to guess those quantities very accurately; and, almost at the first trial, curtails the tube to the proper length, and bends it to the suitable level. All that is needful is to proceed cautiously, so as not to cut the tube too short, for this leads to some trouble.

The great advantage derived by seamen from the establishment of lights on a coast, soon makes the calls for additional lights so frequent, that their very number itself produces a new evil, in the difficulty of distinguishing the lights from each other. As the object of a light is to make known to the benighted mariner the land he has made, with as much certainty as the sight of a hill or tower would shew him his position during the day, it becomes an object of the first importance toDistinctions of Catoptric Lights.impress upon each light a distinctive character, which shall effectually prevent the possibility of its being mistaken for any other.

Catoptric lights are susceptible of nine separate distinctions, which are calledfixed,revolving white,revolving red and white,revolving red with two whites,revolving white with two reds,flashing,intermittent,double fixed lights, anddouble revolving white lights. The first exhibits a steady and uniform appearance, which is not subject to any change; and the reflectors used for it (as already noticed) are of smaller dimensions than those employed in revolving lights. This is necessary, in order to permit them to be ranged round the circular frame, with their axes inclined at such an angle, as shall enable them to illuminate every point of the horizon. The revolving light is produced by the revolution of a frame with three or four sides, having reflectors of a larger size grouped on each side, with their axes parallel; and as the revolution exhibits once in two minutes, or once in a minute, as may be required, a light gradually increasing tofull strength, and in the same gradual manner decreasing to total darkness, its appearance is extremely well marked. The succession ofredandwhitelights is caused by the revolution of a frame whose different sides present red and white lights; and these, as already mentioned, afford three separate distinctions, namely, alternate red and white; the succession of two white lights after one red, and the succession of two red lights after one white light. Theflashinglight is produced in the same manner as therevolvinglight; but owing to a different construction of the frame, the reflectors on each of eight sides are arranged with their rims or faces in one vertical plane, and their axes in a line inclined to the perpendicular, a disposition of the mirrors which, together with the greater quickness of the revolution, which shews a flash once in five seconds of time, produces a very striking effect, totally different from that of a revolving light, and presenting the appearance of the flash alternately rising and sinking. The brightest and darkest periods being but momentary, this light is farther characterised by a rapid succession of bright flashes, from which it gets its name. Theintermittentlight is distinguished by bursting suddenly into view and continuing steadyfor a short time, after which it is suddenly eclipsed for half a minute. Its striking appearance is produced by the perpendicular motion of circular shades in front of the reflectors, by which the light is alternately hid and displayed. This distinction, as well as that called theflashing light, is peculiar to the Scotch coast, having been first introduced by the late Engineer of the Northern Lights Board. The double lights (which are seldom used except where there is a necessity for aleadingline, as a guide for taking some channel or avoiding some danger) are generally exhibited from two Towers, one of which is higher than the other. At the Calf of Man, a striking variety has been introduced into the character of leading lights, by substituting, for twofixedlights, two lights which revolve in the same periods, and exhibit their flashes at the same instant; and these lights are, of course, susceptible of the other variety enumerated above, that of two revolving red and white lights, or flashing lights, coming into view at equal intervals of time. The utility of all these distinctions is to be valued with reference to their property of at once striking the eye of an observer and being instantaneously obvious to strangers.

The introduction of colour, as a source of distinction, is necessary, in order to obtain a sufficient number of distinctions; but it is in itself an evil of no small magnitude; as the effect is produced by interposing coloured media between the burner and the observer’s eye, and much light is thus lost by the absorption of those rays, which are held back in order to cause the appearance which is desired. Trial has been made of various colours; but red, blue, and green alone have been found useful, and the two latter only at distances so short as to render them altogether unfit for sea-lights. Owing to the depth of tint which is required to produce a marked effect, the red shades generally used absorb from ⁴⁄₇ths to ⁵⁄₆ths of the whole light, an enormous loss, and sufficient to discourage the adoption of that mode of distinction in every situation where it can possibly be avoided. The red glass used in France absorbsonly ⁴⁄₇ths of the light; but its colour produces, as might be expected, a much less marked distinction to the seaman’s eye. In the Lighthouses of Scotland, a simple and convenient arrangement exists for colouring the lights, which consists in using chimneys of red glass, instead of placing large discs in front of the reflectors.

Fig. 41.Gauge for reflector alignment

Fig. 41.

After what has been already said on the subject of divergence, it will at once be seen, that in revolving lights the reflectors are placed with their axes parallel to each other, so as to concentrate their power in one direction; whilst in fixed lights it is necessary, in order to approach as near as possible to an equal distribution of the light over the horizon,Arrangement of Reflectors on the Frame.to place the reflectors, with their axes inclined to each other, at an angle somewhat less than that of the divergence of the reflected cone. For this purpose, a brass gauge (seefig. 41), composed of two long arms, AM, AM, somewhat in the form of a pair of common dividers, connected by a means of a graduated limb A, is employed. The arms having been first placed at the angle, which is supplemental to that of the inclination of the axes of the two adjacent mirrors at O, are made to span the faces of the reflectors, one of which ismoved about till its edges are in close contact with the flat surface of one of the arms of the gauge.

Fig. 42.Elevation of revolving apparatus

Fig. 42.

Fig. 43.Plan of revolving apparatus

Fig. 43.

Figs. 42and43shew an elevation and plan of a revolving apparatus on the catoptric principle. In these figures,n nshews the reflector frame or chandelier;o o, the reflectors with their oil-fountainspp. The whole is attached to the revolving axis or shaftq. The copper tubesrrconvey the smoke from the lamps;ssare cross bars which support the shaft att t;u uis a copper pan for receiving any moisture which may accidentally enter at the central ventilator in the roof of the light-room;lis a cast-iron bracket, supporting the cup in which the pivot of the shaft turns;mmare bevelled wheels, which convey motion from the machine to the shaft. The machinery does not require any particular notice, being that of common clock-work, moved by the descent of a weight.

Fig. 44.Reflector arrangement

Fig. 44.

Fig. 44shews a plan of one tier of reflectors arranged in the manner employed in a fixed catoptric light;nnshews the chandelier,qthe fixed shaft in the centre, which supports the whole,oothe reflectors, andppthe fountains of their lamps. In this figure (in order to prevent confusion) only one tier of reflectors is shewn; the other tiers are so arranged, that their axes divide into equal angles the arcs intercepted between the axes of the adjoining reflectors on the first tier, thereby producing the nearest approach to an equal distribution of the light, which is attainable by this arrangement.

In lighthouses of moderate height, the proper position for the reflector itself is perfect horizontality of its axis, which may be ascertained with sufficient accuracy, by trying with a plummet, whether the lips of the instrument, which we may conclude to be at right angles to the plane of its axis, be truly vertical. In lightrooms very much elevated above the sea, however, the dip of the horizon becomes notable; and a slight inclination forwards should be given to the face of the reflectors, so that their axes produced may be tangents to the earth at the visible horizon of the light-room. This, however, must not be permitted to interfere with the perfect horizontality of the top of the burner, which is indispensable to its proper burning.

Bordier Marcet’s Reflectors.Various forms of the parabolic mirror were invented by M.Bordier Marcet, the pupil and successor ofArgand, who has laboured with much enthusiasm in perfecting catoptric instruments, more especially with a view to their application in the illumination of lighthouses and the streets of towns. Amongst many other ingenious combinations, he has invented and constructed an apparatus which is much used in harbour-lights on the French coast,where it is known by the fanciful name ofFanal Sidéral.Fanal[46]sidéral. The object is to fulfil, as economically as possible, the conditions required in a fixed light, by illuminating, with perfect equality, every part of the horizon, by means of a single burner; and M.Bordier Marcethas in his work-shop an instrument of this kind, eight feet in diameter, which he constructed on speculation. The apparatus used in harbour-lights, on the French coast, is of much smaller dimensions, and does not exceed fifteen inches in diameter. A perfect idea of the construction and effect of this instrument may be formed, by conceiving a parabola to revolve about its parameter as a vertical axis, so that its upper and lower limbs would become the generating lines of two surfaces possessing the property of reflecting, in lines parallel to the axis of the parabola, all the rays incident upon them, from a light placed in the point where the parameter and axis of the generating parabola intersect each other. This point being the focus of each parabolic section of this apparatus, light is equally dispersed in every point of the horizon, when the axis of the parabolic section is in a plane perpendicular to a vertical line. But however perfectly this apparatus may attain its important object, it necessarily produces a feeble effect; because as its action is entirely confined to the vertical direction, the light distributed by it decreases directly as the distance of the observer. This beautiful little instrument is shewn atfig. 45, in whichbshews the burner,p pthe upper reflecting surface, andp′ p′the lower reflecting surface, both generated in the manner above described by the revolution of a parabola about its parameterx b; F is the focus of the generating parabola; andllare small pillars, which connect the two reflecting plates, and give strength to the apparatus.

[46]Fanal, from φανεν, a lantern.

Fig. 45.Fanal sidéral

Fig. 45.

M.Bordier Marcethas also prepared an ingenious modification of the paraboloïdal mirror, which he has described under the name ofFanal à double effet.fanal à double effet; and the object of which is to obtain a convenient degree of divergence from parabolic mirrors, by the use of two flames and two reflecting surfaces, each of which is acted upon by its own flame, and also by that of the other. This modification consists in the union of two portions of hollow paraboloïdal mirrors, generated by the revolution of two parabolas about a common horizontal axis, and illuminated by two lamps placed in the focus of each. The first surface is generated by the revolution on its axis of a segment of a paraboloid intercepted between the parameter and some double ordinate greater than it, and may, from its form, be called the ribbon-shaped mirror. The second surface is that of a parabolic conoid, which is cut off by a vertical plane passing through a double ordinate, which is equal to the parameter of the parabolic ribbon, which is placed in front of it. The elements of the curve which forms the conoïdal mirror, must be so chosen as to have its focus at a convenient distance infrontof that of the ribbon-shaped mirror, so as to admit of placing the two lamps separate from each other, as well as to produce the necessary degree of divergence, which is to be obtained by the action of these mirrors respectively on the flame placed in the focus of the other. These two mirrors are joined together in the line of the parametric section of the ribbon, which coincides with the lips of the conoid at some double ordinatebehindits parameter. Each mirror produces, by means of the lamp placed in its focus, an approach to parallelism of the reflected rays, which M.Bordier Marcethas not inaptly termed theprincipal effect; whilst the action of each surface on the lamp which is placed in the focus of the other, causes what the inventor calls thesecondaryorlateral effect. Their secondary action may be described thus: The lamp, which is in the focus of the ribbon, is much nearer the vertex of the conoid than its own focus; so that its rays making, with normals to the surface of the conoid, angles greater than those which are formed by the rays proceeding from its focus, are of necessity reflectedin lines diverging from the axis of the mirror. Those, on the contrary, which proceed from the focus of the conoid, meet the ribbon-shaped surface, so as to make angles with its normals more acute than those which the rays from its own focus could do, and which are, therefore, reflected in lines converging to the axis of the mirror. Those reflected rays must therefore cut the axis, and diverge from it on the other side. This apparatus has been used at La Hève and some other lights on the French coast; but it is impossible not to perceive the great loss of light which results from the use of two flames in one mirror; and it must not be forgotten, that the divergence which is obtained by means of it is not confined to the horizontal direction in which only it is wanted; but that the light is at the same time scattered in every direction round the edge of the mirror.

Arrangements of a similar kind were proposed and executed for the same purpose of uniting greater divergence with considerable power in the central parts of the resultant beam, byArgandhimself, in 1806, and also in 1808, by M.Haudry,Ingénieur des Ponts et Chaussées.Argandproposed the union of a paraboloid, and an ellipsoid having their foci coincident in one point, which being the posterior focus of the latter curve, was illuminated by the rays reflected to it by means of the ellipsoïdal surface from the lamp placed in the anterior focus. From theoptical focusthus obtained, some rays would fall on the paraboloïdal surface and produce, by reflection, a cylinder of parallel rays, while the rest would diverge from the axis, and form a zone of spreading rays. M.Haudry’splan consisted of a combination of a conical with a paraboloïdal mirror, so placed, that the rays from the front part of the hollow cone might be nearly parallel to those sent out by the paraboloid; while the rays from its base diverging from the axis might produce a ring of divergent rays, similar to that obtained from the ellipsoid ofArgand’sapparatus.

It would occupy much time to exhibit all the disadvantages of the arrangements in thefanal à double effetof M.Bordier Marcet,and also in those ofArgandandHaudry; and I shall therefore dismiss the subject by observing, that the loss of light due to the position of the flame in the apparatus ofArgand, is so great as to induce one to wonder that such combinations should ever have been attempted. There can be no doubt, that the most efficient mode of obtaining due divergence from mirrors, is to adopt the paraboloid, with a short focal distance, which has the double advantage of increasing the divergence which is due inversely to the focal distance, and, at the same time, subjecting to the action of the mirror a larger portion of the luminous sphere proceeding from the flame.

Fig. 46.Fanal à double face

Fig. 46.

Fanal à double face.Lastly, I shall notice M.Bordier Marcet’sfanal à double face, which consists of two paraboloïdal mirrors, truncated in the vertical plane of the parameter, and united together back to back, so as to be illuminated by the same lamp placed in their common focus. To save the light which would otherwise escape the catoptric action, he adds a parabolic conoid of greater focal distance, and so placed, that while its focus may coincide with the common focus of the other mirrors, its size may be so restricted, that it shall not interfere with the effect of the truncated mirror opposite which it is placed. The obvious consequence of such an arrangement is, that the rays (seefig. 46) produced from a lamp in the common focus of the three mirrors, will produce in opposite directions a luminous ring from each of the truncated mirrors AC, BC, and A′C′, B′C′, while the central or conoïdal mirror MN will fill the interior of one of those luminous rings with a cone of rays, whose intensity will be in the inverseratio of MN² toab² (or FM² to Fa²), which latter surface represents the whole amount of naturally divergent rays, which strike onab, and which are spread over MN. Two sets of reflectors of this form facing in opposite directions (each set arranged in one plane, and fixed on a frame which could be made to revolve round a vertical axis), would thus present their brightest effect after considerable intervals of darkness; but, by arranging them with their axes slightly inclined, they were made to prolong the light periods and curtail the dark ones. M.Bordier Marcetspeaks of this apparatus with all the satisfaction generally felt by inventors; but it is no difficult matter to identify its effect with that of the common paraboloïdal mirrors. It is obvious, that all the rays which fall from a true focal point on the three reflectors AC, BC, A′C′, B′C′, and MN, are merely those which would fall on a single reflector, whose double ordinate and the portion of the abscissa between that ordinate and the focus, are equal to those of the first reflector of the compound system, so that the quantity of light reflected by the three reflectors is neither more nor less than that which would be projected by one. All the difference that can exist is, that in the case of a flame which has a notable size, the surface MN being farther distant thanab, would produce less aberration and, consequently, a very slight increase of intensity in the small portion of the reflected beam of parallel rays due to that part of the compound mirror. We cannot, therefore, sensibly err in rejecting any advantage to be derived from this arrangement as insignificant.[47]

[47]See Peclet′s Traité de l′Eclairage, p. 302, from which fig. 46 is copied.

Spherical mirrors have been employed in Lighthouses chiefly when they can be introduced to aid the effect of refracting apparatus: and it will not be necessary to say much of them in this place. I must, however, notice an ingenious proposal ofMr Barlow′s Spherical Mirrors.MrW. H. Barlow,[48]who suggests placing in front of the flame a small spherical reflector, whose centre is coincident with the focus of a paraboloïd,and whose subtense is the parameter of the generating curve. The small mirror, being somewhat less than a hemisphere, would cause the light falling upon it to be returned through the focus so as to reach the paraboloïdal surface and to be finally reflected from that portion of it which is embraced between the limits of its extreme divergence. If there were no loss of light at the surface of the small mirror, its effect would be to increase the power of the beam of parallel rays by an amount equal to the sum of the rays incident on the spherical surface, but at the same time to diminish it by intercepting a portion of the light reflected from the paraboloïd. I am not aware that such a combination has been tried, as it applies most advantageously to reflectors whose span does not exceed the parameter of the generating curve, a form rarely adopted in lighthouses; but it might also be adapted to reflectors which intercept a larger portion of light, by making the spherical reflector some segment less than the hemisphere.

[48]In an excellent paper above noticed, on the Illumination of Lighthouses, in the London Transactions, for 1837.

Captain Smith’s Mirrors in the form of a parabolic spindle.Captain Smithof the Madras Engineers, has described in the “Professional papers of the ‘Corps of Royal Engineers,’[49]a new system of fixed lights,” which consists in placing a flat wick in the focus of one-half of a hollow parabolic spindle generated by the rotation of a parabola about its parameter as a vertical axis. The action of the instrument is obvious, for each vertical section being parabolic, effects a change only in theverticaldivergence of the rays incident on it from the focus, and suffers their horizontal direction to remain unaltered; thus each vertical plate of reflected rays passes through the parameter of the curve and illuminates the opposite point of the horizon by means of a narrow strip or line of light. Two hollow spindles of that form, each lighting 180° and facing opposite azimuths, would, therefore, be sufficient to illuminate the whole horizon. The author of the paper, however, appears to contemplate the employment of a series of those mirrors ranged one above another andbreaking jointvertically, somewhat in the manner already described in speaking of the arrangement of the paraboloïdalmirrors used in fixed lights. The advantages of this mode of illumination are much overrated byCaptain Smith, who seems to magnify beyond its real importance the risk attending the use, in the dioptric apparatus, of a single lamp, whose sudden extinction would deprive at once the whole horizon of the benefit of the light; while, on the contrary, he reckons the security obtained by his arrangement as an advantage of the highest value. In certain situations, where no regular establishment of trained light-keepers is maintained, that security may be an object of more importance and may warrant a greater sacrifice, than is necessary in Great Britain; but I have no hesitation in saying, that I know of no situation in which the plan proposed byCaptain Smithcould bear comparison with the mode of illumination for fixed lights by means of the catadioptric instruments ofFresnel.

[49]Vol. v., p. 56.

Back to Index Next