FinalWoodlandArchaeology

Fig. 19. Group of mounds exhibiting bird, mammal, linear and conical mounds as they occur characteristically inEffigy Moundsubcultureof FinalWoodland. (B.B.)

The religious beliefs, too, were probably simplified and mixed with magic and superstition, surviving relics of thereligionof the past age. In a word, the social and religious customs of the little tribes were broadly similar but in minor details differed from each other much as do their artifactual remains.

A study of the FinalWoodlandand other phases of Illinois history reveals certain relationships among some distinguishable differences of detail:

1. The almost complete lack of evidence of Hopewellianart, trade andreligionin the lateWoodlandperiodgives little apparent indication that thepeoplewere the direct descendants and heirs of thatcivilization.On the other hand, the general resemblance of Final Woodland assemblages to those of theInitial phaseseems marked. Let us examine further.

Fig. 20. Graves near Quincy, Illinois,StoneVaultperiod. (Photographs through courtesy of O. D. Thurber.)

Stonemoundafter earth was removed.

Four excavated “vaults”, the third of which shows a “corridor” entrance withstonesteps.

The tobacco pipe of the latephasewith the stem projecting beyond the bowl is found in most aspects. Likewise, the vertically elongated pot is common but not the only form. Burials are often in mounds, frequently in a central chamber or grave, with skeletons in theflexedand/orextendedpositions, occasionally accompanied by grave offerings. All these are broadly reminiscent of Hopewellian customs and, in the writer’s opinion, indicate a continuing thread of tradition from InitialWoodlandthrough Hopewellian into theFinal phase.

2. The relationship to the MiddleMississippiseems more evident and has been attributed by some authors to the “impact” of a highcultureon that of cruder or “under-developed” neighbors. What are the grounds for these conclusions?

New pottery forms were being attempted, the flattened globular pot, the shallow bowl (occasionally found in Hopewellian sites), the cup or beaker and the plate. In southern counties, a new method of making pits is indicated by a tendency of sherds, even grit-tempered ones, to split or laminate (see Maxwell,WoodlandCultures of Southern Illinois, Beloit, 1951, p. 204). Secondary features previously lacking begin to appear as “raised points” or knobs on rims, some roughly resembling animal heads with ears and a snout. Triangulararrowheadsand others reflecting larger spearhead types are all made from curved, not flat flakes as the Mississippian points are. Thestonediscoidal that seems to be the game piece of the historically known chunkey game, which was possibly initiated in late Hopewellian times (see Fowler,The RutherfordMound, Springfield, 1957, pp. 31-33) occurs in the Bluffsubcultureand probably in the Tampico also.

Fig. 21. Canton ware pot (Tampicosubculture) from Clear Lake village site in Tazewell County. Designs are formed with cord impressions. (From Schoenbeck collection in Illinois State Museum. Max. diam. at shoulder 18″.

Fig. 22. “Handled” pipe in form of raven with head projecting from rim, from Jersey Bluffsubculture. After Titterington. Reduced about ½.

All these bespeak Middle Mississippian tendencies. A common conclusion, as mentioned previously, is that these features were borrowed from non-Woodland groups. The writer, however, gets the impression from his studies that the MiddleMississippiphasedeveloped through the interplay of invention and adoption of improvements, modification and re-invention, between the FinalWoodlandsubcultures in Illinois and adjacent territory. This does not mean that Illinois communities alone were responsible for the emergence of this phase but rather that they played an important dynamic role in its development. The Cahokiasubcultureof western and central Illinois probably constituted the native local tribe or nation.

Archaeologically these peoples are in the FinalWoodlandphaseofculture. TheFinal Phaseyields tobacco pipes and crudeflintarrowheads, itschiefartifactual differences with the Initial phase. The clay of their pottery was generally mixed with grit or sand to prevent firing cracks in the vessel walls. The customary vertically-elongated pot with a conical or pointed bottom was accompanied by new forms—the globular or flattened globular with “round” (spherical) bases, the “coconut shell” cup or larger vessel, and shallow bowls. The flattened globular pots and the bowls were occasionally decorated with two orfour knobs or with “raised points” on the rim, sometimes giving a squarish appearance to the mouth. In some instances these decorative projections were crudely modeled ears and snout which give the effect of animals’ heads facing out and foreshadowing the MiddleMississippieffigyshallow bowls. An important invention, the bow and arrow, appears in Illinois for the first time in thisperiod. Judging by the crudity of the chipped flint arrowheads, thesepeoplewere poor archers and preferred the spear andspearthrowerin hunting and fighting. Pipes, like mostartifactsexcept weapon heads, are rare. The “elbow” or L-shaped pipe is generally representative of the culture.

The six recognized FinalWoodlandsubcultures with their diagnostic (though not very significant) traits are (1)Effigy Moundnamed for its distinguishing characteristic; (2) Tampico with pottery decorated with designs formed by cord-impressions, in northern Illinois; (3)StoneVault with stone mounds containing walled tomb chambers; (4) Jersey Bluff with its unique “handled” tobacco pipes, in the west; (5) Raymond, best characterized by the generalized Woodland nature of itsartifacts; and (6) Lewis with incised spiral designs on pottery, in southern Illinois.

The MiddleMississippicultureseems to have arisen, as previously suggested, in the area where several important highways of aboriginal travel converged—the region surrounding the Ohio and Mississippi rivers from the mouth of the Wabash to the mouth of the Illinois. Whether or not its development was stimulated by the contracts of Muskhogeans and Algonkians or whether it was due to interplay between the cultures of the FinalWoodlandpetty tribes is unknown.

Two slightly differing subcultures of theMiddle phaseappeared in the state. One, known archaeologically as theCumberland(Tennessee-Cumberland), may have embraced at one time all the southern Illinois counties between the mouths of the Kaskaskia and the Wabash. [The Angel Site near Evansville, Indiana, may belong to the Cumberlandsubculture.] The other subculture, which may be termed Cahokia, flourished in counties bordering on theMississippifrom Union County to Wisconsin. As the two periods show few significant cultural differences, they will, except as noted hereafter, be treated as a single unit.

The bow and arrow invented in the FinalWoodlandphase, was developed early in the MiddleMississippiperiodinto an effective weapon although spear and perhapsspearthrowercontinued in use. The chunkey game was probably played as a part of a religious ceremony though it may quite possibly have served as a popular pastime as well.

Pottery was slow at first to change from its more obviousWoodlandcharacteristics but new shapes foreshadowing most of those of the fullydeveloped (Old Village) culturalphasepractically replaced the conical-based elongated pot early in theperiod. Cord-roughening and grit-tempering disappeared in theclassicCahokia period, and a fine polished blackware and a painted pottery were added to the smooth utilitarian ware. An excellent “dull gray” ware with smooth gray to brown surfaces was of more common occurrence. It appears to differ from the fine ware only in its partially oxidized surfaces probably due to poorly controlled firing methods.[14]

Fig. 23. The chunkey game in foreground. Man hunting with bow and arrow in background. MiddleMississippiperiod. (J.C.)

There were probably two or more social classes among theMiddle phasepeopleas there were among Hopewellians, Natchez and Polynesians.[15]The fine polished black and painted wares may have beenmarks of distinction between the highest and lower classes since it is much less common. In Hopewellian times, it is probable that both the fine ware and the specialized forms (which were usually of the highest quality) were reserved for the highest caste. In theMississippiperiod, the shallow bowl, the cup or beaker, and the plate of dull gray ware seem to have been wide-spread in the village and may indicate a general improvement of living conditions among the lower social classes since Hopewellian times.

Fig. 24. Pottery shapes, MiddleMississippiperiod. A, “bean pot”; B, angular-shouldered pot or olla; C, common pot or olla; D, shallow bowl; E, water bottle; F,effigybowl; G, plate.

Advances in theeconomywere obviously present in the fully developedMiddle phase. The Union Countyflint“mines” and workshops were intensively worked. Trade with the Lake Superior, lower Atlantic and Gulf Coast regions was resumed.Chiefimports of raw materials were copper and marineshells, Busycon, Marginella, Oliva and Olivella.Art, while possibly as highly developed as Hopewellian, resulted in a far smaller number of art objects in fewer durable media. Intaglio rock carvings (chiefly in southern Illinois) of geometric designs, human hands, ceremonial paraphernalia, animal outlines, and, in a few instances, painted hollowed-out animal silhouettes can probably be ascribed to thisperiodon the basis of the symbols employed. Dwellings or cabins were relatively substantial structures and the extent of village remains indicate a large general population as compared to earlier times in the state. Trade and art suggest leisure and wealth or surplus available for exchange or to support officials and others in non-food productivepursuits. This prosperity was possibly due to newly discovered methods of intensive cultivation of maize and possibly to a greater diversity of crops than ever before.

Fig. 25. Carvedstonepipe (fragmentary) from Kingston Lake Site (Cahokiasubculture, MiddleMississippiperiod). Owned by Donald Wray. Right-hand figure shows the pipe reconstructed.

Territorially the tribe probably consisted of a number of villages and the surrounding country. Each tribe may have had achiefvillage or capital that was also a religious center with tribal (public) buildings and a temple. Archaeological and historical evidence shows that these buildings, presumably temples and the dwellings of tribal chiefs and the high priests, were erected on the flat tops of rectangular earthen mounds or pyramids, which were grouped around a plaza of ceremonial square. Here the tribe gathered for religious and political ceremonies and for important funerals. Intertribal negotiations and chunkey games were probably also staged on or near the plaza.

Pipes, either ofstoneor pottery, were generally of the “equal-armed” type (where stem length is about equal to bowl height). In numerous instances, a short projection resembling the stem in shape but shorter, extends beyond the bowl away from the smoker. Massiveeffigypipes of stone were widespread but not numerous. Some were excellently carved. From their construction, it is obvious that they were made to be smoked through a reed or hollow wooden stem called in later times thecalumet. These together probably constituted a form of ceremonial pipe that served as a safe conduct between tribes, as a bond and signature at peace- and treaty-making ceremonies, and to present tobacco smoke as incense to the gods in religious rituals.

Priests and possibly tribal chiefs were interred in the flat tops of mounds (e.g. the PowellMound) near temple or cabin. Generally, however, the dead were buried in cemeteries. In some instances, bodies were laid on the surface above a “full” cemetery and covered with earth brought from outside. Continuing this practice eventually produced a mound (e.g.Dickson Moundnear Lewistown). Possibly the burial mounds at Cahokia were reserved for the socially prominent while thelower classes were interred in the cemeteries nearby. The dead, especially important personages were attired in their finest apparel,insigniaand personal ornaments. Beside them in the grave were placed their weapons, favorite chunkey stones, food and water in pottery vessels with shell spoons or a dipper.

Fig. 26. Interior view ofDickson Mound(in Dickson Mounds State Park near Lewistown, Illinois), showing pottery and otherartifactsas originally placed with the dead. Cahokiasubculture, MiddleMississippiphase.

Chiefvillages were large religious centers often protected by an encircling palisade or clay wall reinforced with vertical posts or logs. Remains of defensive walls can still be readily traced by a trained eye at the Kincaid (Massac County) and Lynn (Union County) villages. Exploration of theAztalanvillage (Wisconsin) yielded remains of a reinforced clay wall surmounted at regular intervals with towers of like construction. The Cahokia village seems to have been without fortifications.

Fig. 27. Reconstruction of Kincaid Village (Cumberlandsubculture, MiddleMississippiperiod) near Metropolis, Illinois. (Diorama by Arthur Sieving.)

Smaller villages occasionally had one or two small flat-topped mounds which doubtless served as bases for the cabins of the VillageChiefand possiblyWarChief. OtherMiddle phasevillages had no mounds or fortifications.

Cabins were of three or more types. In Illinois, two kinds had rectangular floor outlines and may have developed from the earlier Baumer square dwelling and the Lewis house. One of these types prevalent at Kincaid, as determined from charred remains, had a thatched gable roof supported on four corner posts with their lower ends sunk in the ground. Walls were made of clay daubed on a latticework of cane (with foliage) interlacing vertical wall posts, the interior covered with split cane mats. The rafters, corner and wall posts, and wall plates were of poles or small logs lashed together and held in place by braided ropes. Floors do not appear to have been depressed below surrounding ground level. A larger more substantial structure, presumably a temple, on a Kincaidmound(Mxo9) had thick walls of clay mixed with grass, but otherwise resembled the dwelling just described. The clay floor and wall surfaces were smooth. Fire basins of puddled clay within the building may have been the remains of altars.

Cabins in Fulton County (Fout’s Village) and at Cahokia were rectangular in floor plan but wall posts were probably bent over to be joined with corresponding opposite members to form an arched or vaulted roof, the precursor perhaps of the “barrel-shaped” Illini cabinsreported by French explorers. Floors were sunk somewhat below the ground level. Remains of cabins with circular floors occur also at Cahokia and in Fulton County.

Fig. 28. Petroglyphs from southern Illinois sites probably made by Middle Mississippian peoples. All figures are hollowed out orintaglio. (Photographs by Irvin Peithmann.)

Back wall ofrock shelternear Gorham, Illinois.

Figure of buffalo calf painted yellow over entire depressed area. The outlines were chalked in for the purpose of photographing.

Walls and wall posts of the Fulton County cabins appear in some instances to be formed of bundles of small branches or cane set in trenches possibly a foot deep. There is no evidence of thewattle-and-daubstructure. Walls may have been covered with mats, or with rectangles of bark. Roofs were probably thatched.

Possibly the Cahokiasubculturepeoples constituted a single tribe, a small nation, or a confederation of tribes. At its most powerfulperiod, the Cahokia settlement was perhaps the capital and religious center. The region south of a line joining the mouths of the Kaskaskia and Wabash rivers at one time probably belonged to another tribe or subtribe whosechiefvillage was theKincaid communityin Pope and Massac counties and who, linguistically and culturally, were closely related to peoples in Tennessee and Kentucky and at the Angel site in Indiana.

Archaeologically speaking, the MiddleMississippicontrasts sharply with the Hopewellianculture. Certainartifactsare readily distinguishable and easily identified with the craftsman’s cultures. Actually the Mississippians differ from the Hopewellians chiefly in having substantial cabins, athletic games and the bow and arrow.

Remains of Hopewellian dwellings are rare, but the three or four found up to now are characterized by round or oval floor plans outlined with post holes of three to four inches in diameter. These seem to indicate hemispherical wigwams. No further evidence of wall or roof structure has been recovered. The rarity of these dwellings certainly suggests a less permanent dwelling than theMississippicabin. However, it will be remembered that some peoplespatterntheir tombs upon their dwellings. The upper caste Hopewellians built rectangular burial chambers which were walled up with logs laid one on another and roofed over with half-logs or bark. Similar log house surface structures would seldom leave discernible remains on decay. It is possible, though by no means certain, that the Hopewellians of highest caste, and perhaps of the other castes, built log cabins for dwellings.

The evidence for playing of athletic games in Hopewellian is very late and scanty. The only tangible indication are the rings, “pulleys” and astonediscoidal found with a skeleton in the RutherfordMound. (See M. L. Fowler,The Rutherford Mound, Scientific Papers Series, Vol. VII, No. 1, Springfield, Ill. 1957, pp. 31-33). The rings of pottery and of cannel coal (or jet) seem too fragile for actual playing pieces and may rather be trophies or prizes, replicas of similar pieces made of wood. Such wooden pieces may have been used in games throughout middle and late Hopewellian times.

Fig. 29. (Photographs by Irvin Peithmann.)

View of a stream-sideflintmine and workshop (in field alongside) near Cobden, Illinois.

Close-up showing spherical or “ball-flint” nodules from stream banks similar to those worked up by Middle Mississippians and others in adjacent workshop.

The bow and arrow, at least, seems to be a decided improvement over the spear. It constituted a repeating weapon. Ammunition could be carried in the belt or on the back in a quiver without unduly hampering the bowman. On the other hand, it was useless in hand-to-hand fighting and a spear ordaggerwas needed to supplement it. Moreover, the spear with a thrower was a more accurate weapon than the bow, unless the arrows were carefully made and balanced. The bow neverseems to have wholly replaced the spear which continued to be a favorite weapon down into the European contactperiod.

The improvements that distinguish the Mississippians above the Hopewellians may be more apparent than real in the first two instances and, in the third, may represent a significant rather than a fundamental advance. Looking at the two periods from the broader cultural viewpoint, they appear to have many cultural features in common. The Middle Mississippians probably added new food and fibre plants to those of earlier periods, and perhaps increased production by improved, more intensive methods of cultivation. Their staple crops like those of the Hopewellians were corn, beans and tobacco.

The technologies or methods of making the necessary tools in the two cultures varied but little.Artwas revived or rather re-developed in the Mississippianperiodbut fewer media are employed. In artistic skill, imagination and productiveness perhaps the Hopewellians had an edge on the laterpeople.

Trade and travel, though resumed to distant sections of the continent, does not appear so widespread or general as in the Hopewellianperiod. Aformalized religionwith colorful ceremonies seems to have revitalized the life of thepeoplebut possibly no more effectively than in the earlier period.

There was no significant improvement in labor, power or transportation; all were still accomplished wholly by human effort without the aid of draft animals. Traveling by boat was known and probably used by both cultures.

Comparing the two peoples with other plant growers having no domestic food-draft animals, it seems apparent that each had an effectivepolitical organization, a formalized vitalreligionwith true priests (not “self-appointed” shamans) and a system of moral values and tenets that “church” and “state” were organized to maintain. All in all, from the broader cultural standpoint, they were amazingly alike.

Less advancedMississippitribes with customs showing some admixture ofWoodlandcultural elements living contemporaneously in Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio, encircled theMiddle phasepeoples on the east, north and west. Known generally now as the Upperphasepeoples their sole representative in Illinois was thepeopleof the Langfordsubculture, who dwelt around the southern end of Lake Michigan as well as in adjacent parts of Indiana and Michigan. Thetype stationis the Fisher Village and Mounds near Joliet which were ably investigated by Mr. George Langford, Sr. some years ago.[16]

They built no flat-topped pyramids and left little, if any, evidence of their religious practices. Theirart, as exhibited by pottery, personal ornaments or weapons was not of a high order. There is no evidence that they played the chunkey game. Some copper hatchets and ornaments were in use, but these appear to be of MiddleMississippiworkmanship and may have been trade articles.

On the positive side, they buried their dead in dome-shaped earthen mounds, usually in theextendedposition, frequently with food (in clay pots with shell spoons), weapons (arrows and tomahawks or hafted celts), personal ornaments and various utilitarian implements. Dwellings had subsurface circular floors and were doubtless dome-shaped (hemispherical). The bow and arrow were in common use witharrowheadsprimarily of slender simple triangular shape, very rarely with side notches. Implements, weapons and ornaments were chiefly of chippedflint, ground or polishedstone, river clamshells, bone and animal teeth. Copper was rarely employed.

Fig. 30. Characteristic pottery from the Langfordsubculture, UpperMississippiphase, (Fisher Site near Channahon, Illinois). (Photograph by George Langford, Chicago Natural History Museum.)

Pots were generally of the globular or flattened globular shape (olla or jar), tempered with grit (early) and shell (later), and decorated with geometric designs in broad lines and dots, drawn (“trailed”) or impressed on the shoulder region with a blunt tool (such as an antler tine). Lips of vessels were usually pressure-notched and surfaces cord-roughened. Loop handles on the jars were common.

Numerous examples of flatstonetablets associated with a number of short solid antler cylinders lead one to suspect that a game of chance of some sort was played and that gambling was probably indulged in.

Other than pottery and personal adornment, the onlyartpracticed was the cutting of mussel shell into handled spoons and outlines of fish and other objects. Apparently there was no urge for fine workmanship.

It is highly probable that these Upper Mississippians were plant growers who hunted to secure their meat. The extent of village remains and the evidence of semi-permanent dwellings point to this type ofeconomyeven though no grain or seeds of any kind were found inthe site. Shell hoes of the common type were used. The dog was the only domesticated animal.

Fig. 31.Effigyfish and a decorated spoon (fragmentary) made of musselshells. Langfordsubculture, UpperMississippiphase(Fisher site). (Photograph by George Langford, Chicago Natural History Museum.)

Fig. 32.Stonetablet and gaming pieces from the Langford subculturalperiod, UpperMississippiphase(Fisher site). (Photograph by George Langford, Chicago Natural History Museum.)

Apparently most of their needs were supplied by their own efforts and from local sources. There is no evidence of any trade, except possibly of a very limited kind with near neighbors to the west.

The evidence for the residence around the southern lake shores is based chiefly on the occurrence of the Fisher pottery type. This area after 1760 was occupied by the Miami tribe who may possibly have been the builders of the Fisher Mounds.

The Illinois or Illini Indians are, so far as is now known, the next group to occupy the state following the Middle Mississippians. At the time of Marquette and Jolliet’s voyage in 1673, six tribes comprised the Illinois Confederacy, Kaskaskia, Cahokia, Michigamea, Peoria, Moingwena, and Tamaroa[18]. The tribes spoke the same or mutually intelligible dialects of the Algonkian language.

Some time before 1650, possibly a century or more, the Illinois Confederacy seems to have been a powerful nation but in the latter half of the 17th century this was a tradition rather than fact. The Confederacy appears to have engaged in no united action after 1650.

The Illini at that time were in the plant-raisingstageofcultureand possessed only the dog as a domesticated animal. Like many other plant-raisers, the families deserted the village for the hunt after the corn was hilled and again after the harvest.

Men went naked in summer except for mocassins. At times abreech clothwas worn; in winter buffalo skin robes were added and belts, leg bands and leggings on occasion.

Women when working apparently wore only a girdle (breech cloth), at other times a wrap-around skirt of skin with a belt passing over one shoulder and under the opposite arm. The skirt dates back to Hopewellian times and was used during theMississippiperiodin Indiana and probably in Illinois. The bosom was covered with a deerskin wrap. Hair was worn long and fastened behind the head.

Labor was divided between the men and the women (and children). Men did the hunting, fighting and made the weapons. The women (and children) did the other work—the housework, planting and harvesting the crops, dressing deer and buffalo skins, making twine frombast, weaving cloth and, on the hunt, carrying the house parts and setting up the camp.

Back to Index Next