“The drying up a single tear has moreOf honest fame than shedding seas of gore.And why? because it brings self-approbation:Whereas the other, after all its glare,Shouts, bridges, arches, pensions from a nation,Which (it may be) has not much left to spare,A higher title or a loftier station,Tho’ they may make Corruption gape or stare,Yet in the end, except in Freedom’s battles—Are nothing but a child of Murder’s rattles.”—Byron.
“The drying up a single tear has moreOf honest fame than shedding seas of gore.And why? because it brings self-approbation:Whereas the other, after all its glare,Shouts, bridges, arches, pensions from a nation,Which (it may be) has not much left to spare,A higher title or a loftier station,Tho’ they may make Corruption gape or stare,Yet in the end, except in Freedom’s battles—Are nothing but a child of Murder’s rattles.”—Byron.
“The drying up a single tear has more
Of honest fame than shedding seas of gore.
And why? because it brings self-approbation:
Whereas the other, after all its glare,
Shouts, bridges, arches, pensions from a nation,
Which (it may be) has not much left to spare,
A higher title or a loftier station,
Tho’ they may make Corruption gape or stare,
Yet in the end, except in Freedom’s battles—
Are nothing but a child of Murder’s rattles.”—Byron.
The rattles of this preeminent child of Murder were heard in deafening clatter over all Europe for twenty years; there is a singular dearth of the acts that have honest fame or that conduce to self-approbation. A steely selfishness from first to last marks the career of Napoleon Bonaparte.
Nearly a hundred years have passed away since Nap’s dread Waterloo. There have been wars since then and much blood has flowed, tho’ perhaps of no one battle since Waterloo may it decisively be said that had victory gone other than it did go, all subsequent history would be essentially different from what it is.
Perhaps in our Civil War the three days’ battle of Gettysburg may seem to hold a determinant place. The continuance of slavery and the break up of the young Republic of the West would surely have made a momentous page of history—but one with which we are happily unfamiliar. Nor would the import of that page affect only us and our Republic; both continents are now more or less favorably influenced by what we now are, so may they have been unfavorably influenced by what we might have been. But Gettysburg is too near for perfect vision. Then,too, the personal element, favorable or unfavorable, is conducive to myopia. So with Waterloo, secure in a hundred years’ perspective, the Battles of Destiny end.
In a hasty glance over the historic field from Memphis, 5000 B. C. to Mexico, 1914 A. D.—the great conflicts of nations loom sullenly as blood red peaks daubing the darkness. There is no sequence; they lead nowhere; they just sullenly, luridly bleed. Memphis; Nineveh; Babylon; Marathon, Salamis, Syracuse, Ægospotami, Leuctra, Mantinea, Chæronea; Granicus, Issus, Arbela; Ipsus; Cannæ, Zama, Cynoscephalæ, Magnesia, Pharsalia, Philippi, Actium; Teutobergerwald; Chalons; Tours; Hastings; Orleans; Lepanto; Blenheim; Naseby; Pultova; Saratoga; Valmy; Waterloo; Gettysburg; Mukden; Adrianople; Mexico—as blood red peaks dot the darkness. Is warfare and concomitant hate the natural state of man? The peaks ooze blood in answer.
Some pessimistic glimmerings of the Epicurean philosophy seem to scintillate out from the past. And that philosophy, crystallized in Lucretius’ cynic saying,Homo homini lupus(One man is a wolf to another man) glitters in icicle harshness and coldness down in the darkness. And yet amidst this general censure of the heart of man I hear a shrill true cry of self exculpation. I am not a wolf to man or beast or bird. My hands are clean; my heart is kind. Am I unique in the human nature plan? No. May I affirm of self that which I deny of others? No. My own light illumines the darkness and leads upward and on.
Cease Firing, Lay Down Your Arms, “We speak for those (dumb animals) who cannot speak for themselves”; “I would not enter on my list of friends the man who needlessly sets foot upon a worm”; “He who is not actively kind is cruel”—are among the utterances of the hour that tip the farthest pendulum-swing from old Lucretius’ snarl. Wars must cease. Thesearchlight of civilization’s best thought and feelings is turned full upon war—showing its hitherto darkly concealed causes; its concomitant wrongs, sufferings, shamble horrors; its calamitous, nation-suicidal results. However necessary or inevitable the arbitrament by the sword may have been in the past, it is so no longer.
Let wars cease: in the name of all the bloody battlefields from Marathon to Waterloo; and in pity for all the war-woe from Egypt’s Memphis down to Mexico—let wars cease.
FOOTNOTE:[A]Death of General Nogi.
[A]Death of General Nogi.
[A]Death of General Nogi.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTEObvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources.Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text, and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained.‘Blucher’ has been replaced everywhere by ‘Blücher’.Pg 12,63: ‘Peloponessian War’ replaced by ‘Peloponnesian War’.Pg 12: ‘fractricidal strife’ replaced by ‘fratricidal strife’.Pg 13: ‘seemed jubliant in’ replaced by ‘seemed jubilant in’.Pg 14: ‘attacked vigoriously’ replaced by ‘attacked vigorously’.Pg 19: ‘a fugutive, bereft’ replaced by ‘a fugitive, bereft’.Pg 24,25,59: ‘Rennaissance’ replaced by ‘Renaissance’.Pg 29: ‘terror siezed’ replaced by ‘terror seized’.Pg 38: ‘what Seutonius says’ replaced by ‘what Suetonius says’.Pg 52: ‘Platea, Salamis’ replaced by ‘Platæa, Salamis’.Pg 53: ‘upheavel of any’ replaced by ‘upheaval of any’.Pg 59: ‘of Assissi:’ replaced by ‘of Assisi:’.Pg 59: ‘Cressy, Potiers’ replaced by ‘Cressy, Poitiers’.Pg 60: ‘Gibbons says:’ replaced by ‘Gibbon says:’.Pg 60: ‘by the Greks’ replaced by ‘by the Greeks’.Pg 66: ‘pentinential expiation’ replaced by ‘penitential expiation’.Pg 68: ‘what evancescent’ replaced by ‘what evanescent’.Pg 77: ‘conquered at Portiers’ replaced by ‘conquered at Poitiers’.Pg 89: ‘Beauvias were’ replaced by ‘Beauvais were’.Pg 95: ‘John, ideal Chirstian’ replaced by ‘John, ideal Christian’.Pg 98: ‘Ulich Ali, seeing’ replaced by ‘Ulrich Ali, seeing’.Pg 98: ‘were siezed as’ replaced by ‘were seized as’.Pg 100: ‘similar cricumstances’ replaced by ‘similar circumstances’.Pg 103: ‘as a maritine’ replaced by ‘as a maritime’.Pg 104: ‘Artistotle, master’ replaced by ‘Aristotle, master’.Pg 104: ‘Macchiavelli, serpent’ replaced by ‘Machiavelli, serpent’.Pg 104: ‘any more realiable’ replaced by ‘any more reliable’.Pg 105: ‘galeons and galeasses’ replaced by ‘galleons and galleasses’.Pg 108: ‘buccanneers siezed upon his galeons’ replaced by‘buccaneers seized upon his galleons’.Pg 109: ‘Macchievellian queen’ replaced by ‘Machiavellian queen’.Pg 109: ‘leaky caravals’ replaced by ‘leaky caravels’.Pg 117: ‘his side, abbetted’ replaced by ‘his side, abetted’.Pg 124: ‘enimity one’ replaced by ‘enmity one’.Pg 128: ‘in the tumbril’ replaced by ‘in the tumbrel’.Pg 130: ‘razed the Pyrennees’ replaced by ‘razed the Pyrenees’.Pg 130: In the poem by Southey a newline has been added after ‘looks up’.The rest of the poem has several lines out of order, but this has not been changed.Pg 132: ‘the Thiry’ replaced by ‘the Thirty’.Pg 138: ‘Te Deum ecstacy’ replaced by ‘Te Deum ecstasy’.Pg 140: ‘As result of’ replaced by ‘As a result of’.Pg 141: ‘neglegible—and yet’ replaced by ‘negligible—and yet’.Pg 146: ‘Prusia, urged’ replaced by ‘Prussia, urged’.Pg 149: ‘Brittainy there was’ replaced by ‘Brittany there was’.Pg 155: ‘the Coaliton even’ replaced by ‘the Coalition even’.Pg 158: ‘joined the curassiers’ replaced by ‘joined the cuirassiers’.Pg 160: ‘The Macchievellian’ replaced by ‘The Machiavellian’.Pg 160: ‘will-o-the’ wisps’ replaced by ‘will-o-the-wisps’.Pg 162: ‘True to Brittania’ replaced by ‘True to Britannia’.Pg 162: ‘young Duc d’ Enghein’ replaced by ‘young Duc d’Enghien’.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE
Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources.
Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text, and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained.
‘Blucher’ has been replaced everywhere by ‘Blücher’.Pg 12,63: ‘Peloponessian War’ replaced by ‘Peloponnesian War’.Pg 12: ‘fractricidal strife’ replaced by ‘fratricidal strife’.Pg 13: ‘seemed jubliant in’ replaced by ‘seemed jubilant in’.Pg 14: ‘attacked vigoriously’ replaced by ‘attacked vigorously’.Pg 19: ‘a fugutive, bereft’ replaced by ‘a fugitive, bereft’.Pg 24,25,59: ‘Rennaissance’ replaced by ‘Renaissance’.Pg 29: ‘terror siezed’ replaced by ‘terror seized’.Pg 38: ‘what Seutonius says’ replaced by ‘what Suetonius says’.Pg 52: ‘Platea, Salamis’ replaced by ‘Platæa, Salamis’.Pg 53: ‘upheavel of any’ replaced by ‘upheaval of any’.Pg 59: ‘of Assissi:’ replaced by ‘of Assisi:’.Pg 59: ‘Cressy, Potiers’ replaced by ‘Cressy, Poitiers’.Pg 60: ‘Gibbons says:’ replaced by ‘Gibbon says:’.Pg 60: ‘by the Greks’ replaced by ‘by the Greeks’.Pg 66: ‘pentinential expiation’ replaced by ‘penitential expiation’.Pg 68: ‘what evancescent’ replaced by ‘what evanescent’.Pg 77: ‘conquered at Portiers’ replaced by ‘conquered at Poitiers’.Pg 89: ‘Beauvias were’ replaced by ‘Beauvais were’.Pg 95: ‘John, ideal Chirstian’ replaced by ‘John, ideal Christian’.Pg 98: ‘Ulich Ali, seeing’ replaced by ‘Ulrich Ali, seeing’.Pg 98: ‘were siezed as’ replaced by ‘were seized as’.Pg 100: ‘similar cricumstances’ replaced by ‘similar circumstances’.Pg 103: ‘as a maritine’ replaced by ‘as a maritime’.Pg 104: ‘Artistotle, master’ replaced by ‘Aristotle, master’.Pg 104: ‘Macchiavelli, serpent’ replaced by ‘Machiavelli, serpent’.Pg 104: ‘any more realiable’ replaced by ‘any more reliable’.Pg 105: ‘galeons and galeasses’ replaced by ‘galleons and galleasses’.Pg 108: ‘buccanneers siezed upon his galeons’ replaced by‘buccaneers seized upon his galleons’.Pg 109: ‘Macchievellian queen’ replaced by ‘Machiavellian queen’.Pg 109: ‘leaky caravals’ replaced by ‘leaky caravels’.Pg 117: ‘his side, abbetted’ replaced by ‘his side, abetted’.Pg 124: ‘enimity one’ replaced by ‘enmity one’.Pg 128: ‘in the tumbril’ replaced by ‘in the tumbrel’.Pg 130: ‘razed the Pyrennees’ replaced by ‘razed the Pyrenees’.Pg 130: In the poem by Southey a newline has been added after ‘looks up’.The rest of the poem has several lines out of order, but this has not been changed.Pg 132: ‘the Thiry’ replaced by ‘the Thirty’.Pg 138: ‘Te Deum ecstacy’ replaced by ‘Te Deum ecstasy’.Pg 140: ‘As result of’ replaced by ‘As a result of’.Pg 141: ‘neglegible—and yet’ replaced by ‘negligible—and yet’.Pg 146: ‘Prusia, urged’ replaced by ‘Prussia, urged’.Pg 149: ‘Brittainy there was’ replaced by ‘Brittany there was’.Pg 155: ‘the Coaliton even’ replaced by ‘the Coalition even’.Pg 158: ‘joined the curassiers’ replaced by ‘joined the cuirassiers’.Pg 160: ‘The Macchievellian’ replaced by ‘The Machiavellian’.Pg 160: ‘will-o-the’ wisps’ replaced by ‘will-o-the-wisps’.Pg 162: ‘True to Brittania’ replaced by ‘True to Britannia’.Pg 162: ‘young Duc d’ Enghein’ replaced by ‘young Duc d’Enghien’.