FOOTNOTES:[1]A full account by the Rev. G. M. Livett in Archæologia Cantiana, xviii.[2]For Norman work, see the paper by Mr. W. H. St. John Hope in Archæologia, xlix., and Mr. Ashpitel’s earlier essay in Jour. of the Brit. Archæol. Assoc., ix.[3]Anonymous, but probably by the Rev. S. Denne and W. Shrubsole. Published in 1772; second edition, 1817.[4]See footnote on p.6.[5]For further information about this altar, see p.68.[6]See p.112.[7]The original dedication was to St. Andrew.[8]These answers are published in the Fourth Report of the Historical Manuscripts Commission.[9]A longer account of the funeral was published in the Gazette at the time. Its date is given as the 6th May in the Cathedral Registers, but this must be wrong.[10]The numbers in [] in this section refer to the plan.[11]See note on p.10.[12]Sam. xiv. 4-14; xviii. 1-4; xxxi. 2.[13]1 Macc. iii. 12; ix. 10; ix. 18.[14]“Archæologia Cantiana,” x. 70.[15]This account of it is chiefly taken from a paper by G. Neilson, first published in “Transactions of the Glasgow Archæological Society,” 1896.
[1]A full account by the Rev. G. M. Livett in Archæologia Cantiana, xviii.
[1]A full account by the Rev. G. M. Livett in Archæologia Cantiana, xviii.
[2]For Norman work, see the paper by Mr. W. H. St. John Hope in Archæologia, xlix., and Mr. Ashpitel’s earlier essay in Jour. of the Brit. Archæol. Assoc., ix.
[2]For Norman work, see the paper by Mr. W. H. St. John Hope in Archæologia, xlix., and Mr. Ashpitel’s earlier essay in Jour. of the Brit. Archæol. Assoc., ix.
[3]Anonymous, but probably by the Rev. S. Denne and W. Shrubsole. Published in 1772; second edition, 1817.
[3]Anonymous, but probably by the Rev. S. Denne and W. Shrubsole. Published in 1772; second edition, 1817.
[4]See footnote on p.6.
[4]See footnote on p.6.
[5]For further information about this altar, see p.68.
[5]For further information about this altar, see p.68.
[6]See p.112.
[6]See p.112.
[7]The original dedication was to St. Andrew.
[7]The original dedication was to St. Andrew.
[8]These answers are published in the Fourth Report of the Historical Manuscripts Commission.
[8]These answers are published in the Fourth Report of the Historical Manuscripts Commission.
[9]A longer account of the funeral was published in the Gazette at the time. Its date is given as the 6th May in the Cathedral Registers, but this must be wrong.
[9]A longer account of the funeral was published in the Gazette at the time. Its date is given as the 6th May in the Cathedral Registers, but this must be wrong.
[10]The numbers in [] in this section refer to the plan.
[10]The numbers in [] in this section refer to the plan.
[11]See note on p.10.
[11]See note on p.10.
[12]Sam. xiv. 4-14; xviii. 1-4; xxxi. 2.
[12]Sam. xiv. 4-14; xviii. 1-4; xxxi. 2.
[13]1 Macc. iii. 12; ix. 10; ix. 18.
[13]1 Macc. iii. 12; ix. 10; ix. 18.
[14]“Archæologia Cantiana,” x. 70.
[14]“Archæologia Cantiana,” x. 70.
[15]This account of it is chiefly taken from a paper by G. Neilson, first published in “Transactions of the Glasgow Archæological Society,” 1896.
[15]This account of it is chiefly taken from a paper by G. Neilson, first published in “Transactions of the Glasgow Archæological Society,” 1896.