The Project Gutenberg eBook ofBritish Socialism

The Project Gutenberg eBook ofBritish SocialismThis ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online atwww.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.Title: British SocialismAuthor: J. Ellis BarkerRelease date: March 19, 2009 [eBook #28361]Language: EnglishCredits: E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Carl Hudkins, jnik (media provider), and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BRITISH SOCIALISM ***

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online atwww.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: British SocialismAuthor: J. Ellis BarkerRelease date: March 19, 2009 [eBook #28361]Language: EnglishCredits: E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Carl Hudkins, jnik (media provider), and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

Title: British Socialism

Author: J. Ellis Barker

Release date: March 19, 2009 [eBook #28361]

Language: English

Credits: E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Carl Hudkins, jnik (media provider), and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BRITISH SOCIALISM ***

E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Carl Hudkins,jnik (media provider),and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team(http://www.pgdp.net)

Transcriber's Note:Inconsistent hyphenation in the original document has been preserved.This e-book has many unusual words and spelling that have been retained.Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. For a complete list, please see theend of this document.

Transcriber's Note:

Inconsistent hyphenation in the original document has been preserved.

This e-book has many unusual words and spelling that have been retained.

Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. For a complete list, please see theend of this document.

CHAPTERPAGEI.Introduction—What is Socialism?1II.Some Socialist Views of Present Society and of the Society of the Future10III.The Grievances of the Socialists30IV.The Fundamental Doctrines of Socialism50V.The Aims and Policy of the Socialists92VI.The Attitude of Socialists towards the Working Masses115VII.The Attitude of Socialists towards Trade Unionists and Co-operators131VIII.Socialist Views and Proposals regarding Land and the Landlords145IX.Socialist Views and Proposals regarding Capital and the Capitalists152X.Socialist Views and Proposals regarding Taxation and the National Budget160XI.Socialism and the Empire170XII.Socialist Views on International Relations and Foreign Policy183XIII.Socialism and the Army192XIV.Socialism and the Monarchy207XV.Socialist Views on Parliament and the National Administration209XVI.The Attitude of the Socialists towards the Two Parliamentary Parties225XVII.Socialism and Local Government240XVIII.Socialism and Agriculture261XIX.Socialist Views on British Railways and Shipping269XX.Some Socialist Views on Money, Banks, and Banking278XXI.Some Socialist Views on Free Trade and Protection285XXII.Socialism and Education302XXIII.The Attitude of Socialists Towards Providence, Thrift, and Temperance311XXIV.Socialist Views on Law and Justice325XXV.Socialism and Woman, the Family and the Home330XXVI.The Socialist Attitude Towards Christianity and Religion354XXVII.The Religion of Socialism364XXVIII.Christian Socialism375XXIX.Socialism and Communism381XXX.Socialism and Anarchism394XXXI.Socialism and Revolution404XXXII.State Socialism411XXXIII.The Socialist Organisations: their Mutual Relations and their Policy415XXXIV.The Growth and Danger of British Socialism431XXXV.How the Progress of Socialism may be Checked440XXXVI.Is Socialism Possible?—a Glance into the Socialist State of the Future444XXXVII.Conclusion470Appendix—Official Programmes of the Socialistic Organisations481Bibliography493Analytical Index509

What is Socialism?

It is exceedingly difficult to answer that question in a few words, for Socialism is exceedingly elusive and bewildering in its doctrines, its aims, and its proposals.

Its opponents have described it as "a doctrine of sordid materialism and of atheism," they have denounced it as "the gospel of everlasting bellyful,"[1]and as "the coming slavery."[2]They have stated that Socialism means to abolish religion, that it "would try to put laziness, thriftlessness, and inefficiency on a par with industry, thrift, and efficiency, that it would strive to break up not merely private property, but, what is far more important, the home, the chief prop upon which our whole civilisation stands."[3]

The Socialists, on the other hand, claim that "Socialism presents the only living ideal of human existence"[4]; that "Socialism is science applied with knowledge and understanding to all branches of human activity"[5]; that"Socialism is freedom,"[6]and that it is exceedingly just, for "the justice of Socialism will see all things, and therefore understand all things."[7]One of the Socialist leaders has told us "Socialism is much more than either a political creed or an economic dogma. It presents to the modern world a new conception of society and a new basis upon which to build up the life of the individual and of the State."[8]Another informs us "Socialism to Socialists is not a Utopia which they have invented, but a principle of social organisation which they assert to have been discovered by the patient investigators into sociology whose labours have distinguished the present century."[9]A third has stated that "Socialism is really neither more nor less than the science of sociology."[10]A fourth asserts that "it is a scientific scheme of national government entirely wise, just, and practical."[11]A fifth states "Socialism to me has always meant not a principle, but certain definite economic measures which I wish to see taken."[12]

Other Socialists have taught that "Socialism is an ethical system founded on justice and truth; it is a heartfelt, soul-inspiring religion, resting upon the love of God."[13]"Socialism is a theory of social organisation, which reconciles the individual to society. It has discovered how the individual in society can attain to a state of complete development."[14]"Socialism is the right of the community, acting in its corporate capacity, to intervene in the lives and labours of men and women."[15]"Socialism is nothing but the extension of democratic self-government from the political to the industrial world."[16]"Socialism is an endeavour to substitute for the anarchical struggle or fight for existence an organised co-operation for existence."[17]"Socialism may be described as an endeavour to readjust the machinery of industry in such a way that it can at once depend upon and issue in a higher kind of character and social type than is encouraged by the conditions of ordinary competitive enterprise."[18]"Socialism is the development of policies concerning the welfare of society."[19]"It is not arbitrary destruction and reconstruction, but a natural process of development."[20]"The idea of Socialism will conquer the world, for this idea is nothing but the real, well understood interest of mankind."[21]"Its principles will carry the whole human race to a higher state of perfection."[22]"It is the great modern protest against unreality, against the delusive shams which now masquerade as verities."[23]"Socialism is of the character of a historical discovery."[24]"Socialism, the inspiring principle of all Labour Parties, whether they know it or not, is the next world movement—the movement of the constructive intellect."[25]

Socialism is rich in promises, and its claims to our consideration and support are manifold. Are these claims justified or not? Are the Socialists or the Anti-Socialists right in their conception of Socialism?

The Socialists maintain that all opposition to Socialism is based either on self-interest or ignorance, andprincipally upon the latter. Therefore one of the Socialist leaders wrote: "Those who wish to understand Socialism will be wise to study Socialist books and papers. One does not expect a true and fair account of any theory or cause from its enemies. The man who takes his ideas of Trade-Unionism from the Free Labour League, his ideas of Liberalism from the Tory papers, his ideas of South African affairs—or any other affairs—from the Yellow Press, will be misled into all manner of absurdities and errors. The statements of party politicians and party newspapers on most controversial subjects are prejudiced and inaccurate; but there is no subject upon which the professional misleaders of the people are so untrustworthy and so disingenuous as they are upon the subject of Socialism."[26]A leading Socialist organ complained: "Our opponents decline to deal with the fundamental principles of Socialism—its unanswerable indictment of the capitalist system, with all its concomitants of wage-slavery and slumdom; prostitution and child murder—and prefer instead to indulge in calumniation and misrepresentation of Socialism. We need not complain about that. It is a tribute to the soundness of the Socialist position, to the irrefutability of its principles, the impregnability of the rock of economic truth upon which it is based, that our enemies dare not oppose the principles of Socialism, dare not attempt to meet the charge Socialism levels against the existing order."[27]

There is much truth in these complaints. The general public and most writers and speakers know very little about Socialism, because this most interesting subject has been very inadequately treated in the existing books.

The existing books on Socialism describe, analyse, and criticise the Socialist doctrines only in the abstractas a rule. However, Socialism is not only an elaborate economic doctrine, it is at the same time a complete system of practical politics. Hence it does not suffice to study the doctrines of Socialism by themselves. In order to understand Socialism we must also investigate its practical proposals.

Following the methods of our political economists, most writers on Socialism have, unfortunately, treated Socialism rather as a scientific abstraction than as a business proposition. Consequently the most important practical details of Socialism, such as: What are the views of the Socialist with regard to the Monarchy, the Army, the Banks, the National Currency, the Law, Education? what are their practical aims as regards Parliamentary Representation, Foreign Policy, Agriculture, Taxation, Old-age Pensions, Fiscal Policy? what are their relations with the Parliamentary Parties, the Trade-Unions, the Co-operators, etc? what is their attitude towards International Communism and Anarchism? is English Socialism an Evolutionary or a Revolutionary Movement?—these and many other questions are touched but lightly or are not touched at all.

It is somewhat difficult to deal fully with the practical proposals of the Socialists, because the Socialists are very averse from formulating their aims and disclosing their plans. An English Socialist wrote: "To dogmatise about the form which the Socialist State shall take is to play the fool."[28]Another one stated: "It is quite impossible, at this time, nor would it be desirable, if possible, to lay down any hard and fast line as to the development of the details of Socialist organisation. Broad principles are all that can with any degree of confidence be spoken about. The details will arrange themselves, as the time arrives when it becomes necessary to settle them."[29]Gronlund, perhaps the most prominent American Socialist, stated: "Socialists do not profess to be architects. They have not planned the future in minute detail."[30]Herr Bebel, the leader of the German Social-Democratic Party, said on February 3, 1893, in the Reichstag, replying to the Roman Catholics, "We do not ask from you the details of the future life of which you speak so incessantly. Why, then, do you ask us about the future society?"[31]Although we are told that "Socialism claims the consideration of mankind, because it comes forward and offers a complete scheme to improve the conditions of human life,"[32]Socialists carefully abstain as a rule from giving us the details of that scheme.

The Socialists of all countries have very excellent reasons for keeping to themselves the details of their plans for the future. Nevertheless, a careful search through their numerous writings will enable us to obtain a fairly clear and comprehensive view of their political and economic plans and intentions.

Great Britain does not as yet possess a great Socialist party but only a number of Socialist groups and factions which are totally at variance as regards their aims, policy, and tactics. "They differ as to the best means of getting what they want, and as to the best ways of managing the work, and as to the proper way of sharing the earnings. Some Socialists still believe that Socialism will have to be got by force. I think there are not many. Some are in favour of buying the land, the railways, the machinery, and other things; and some are in favour of taking them, by force, or by new laws. Then some say that there should be no wages paid at all, but that everyone should do an equal share of work, and take whatever he needed from the nation's goods. Others say that all men shoulddo an equal share of work, and have an equal share of the goods, or of the earnings. Others say it would be better to pay wages, as now, but to let the wages be fixed by the Government, or by corporations, or other officials, and that all wages should be equal. Others, again, say that wages should be paid, that the wages should be fixed as above stated, and that different kinds of work should be paid for at different rates. In one kind of Socialism the civil engineer, the actor, the general, the artist, the tram guard, the dustman, the milliner, and the collier would all be paid the same wages. In another kind of Socialism there would be no wages, but all would be called upon to work, and all who worked would 'take according to their needs.' In another kind of Socialism the civil engineer would be paid more than the navvy, the opera singer more than the milliner, the general more than the sergeant, and the editor more than the scavenger."[33]

Notwithstanding these numerous and important differences, of which more will be learned in the course of this book, British Socialists are absolutely united in certain important respects. "The policies of Socialism are a changeable quantity, though the principle is as fixed as the Northern Star."[34]"Socialism is as flexible in its form as it is definite in its principles."[35]

A superficial study of Socialism reveals to us not a single and generally accepted plan, but a confused and confusing mass of mutually contradictory plans and doctrines. Therefore he who wishes to know what Socialism is, must study the many-headed movement in its entirety and give an impartial hearing to all its advocates. We can understand Socialism only if we are acquainted with practically its entire literature.

Unfortunately the literature of Socialism is very vast. A complete collection of modern Socialist literature would embrace at least thirty thousand items. Therefore a full analysis of international Socialism based upon the study of the original sources is a forbidding undertaking. I have consequently limited myself to the investigation of the British Socialist movement, although I have cast a cursory glance upon foreign Socialism whenever it seemed necessary to do so.

I have consulted altogether about a thousand books and pamphlets, and have given representative extracts from four hundred or five hundred of those which seemed most proper to elucidate the subject of this book. Having given space to the views of all the Socialist groups, this book is a summary of the whole literature of British Socialism and a key to it. It is based exclusively on first-hand evidence, and every statement contained in it can instantly be verified by reference to the original sources indicated in the footnotes. In the Bibliography at the end of this volume the full title, publisher's address, and date of publication of all sources drawn upon are given, so that readers will have no difficulty in procuring any Socialist books they may want for further study.

Most of the books quoted are unknown to booksellers, and are not in public libraries. Even the British Museum Library possesses only part of the publications used in this book, which is the first to exploit fully the whole Socialist party literature. Whilst most books on Socialism take note only of Socialist text-books addressed to students, the present volume considers chiefly the propaganda literature which is educating the Socialist rank and file and shaping its political views. For all practical political purposes the propaganda literature is undoubtedly by far the more important of the two to the statesman and the citizen.

The present volume is the only book of its kind, and I hope that the Socialist movement in Germany, France, and the United States will be treated with similar completeness by writers of these countries. The perusal of the present volume will enable us to form an opinion of the merits or demerits of the Socialistic theories and practical plans, and make it possible for us to separate the grain from the chaff, the wisdom from the folly, in the teachings of the Socialists. Thus we shall be able to see which of their complaints and proposals are justified and practical, and which are unjustified and unpractical.

Popular dissatisfaction, Socialistic and non-Socialistic, points to the existence of ills in the body politic, and the Socialistic agitation is exceedingly valuable inasmuch as it draws general attention to these ills. Some complaints of the Socialists will be found to be imaginary, others are very real.

It would be a sterile undertaking merely to analyse and criticise Socialism and the Socialistic proposals. Therefore, after having described the policy, ideals, and aims of the Socialists, I mean to analyse the disease of which Socialism is a consequence and a symptom, and to propose practical measures for curing it.

In the course of this book I shall show that Socialism seems likely to become a very great danger in this country—a far greater danger than is generally realised. Therefore its opponents will be wise not to sneer at Socialism, but to study it and to try to understand it. That task will be found worth our while, and only after it shall we be able to further Socialism if it is beneficial, to combat it if it is pernicious, and to correct it if it is only the misguided expression of genuine suffering and want. Indifference to a great and dangerous political movement such as Socialism may have the gravest consequences. Idlers do not make history. They suffer it.

[1]Millar,Socialism, p. 21.

[2]Herbert Spencer,The Man versus the State, p. 18 ff.

[3]Roosevelt, Presidential Message, December 1907.

[4]Walter Crane in Squire,Socialism and Art, Foreword.

[5]Bebel,Woman, p. 256.

[6]Kessack,Capitalist Wilderness, p. 2.

[7]Ford,Woman and Socialism, p. 3.

[8]Keir Hardie,From Serfdom to Socialism, p. 1.

[9]Webb,The Difficulties of Individualism, p. 3.

[10]Hyndman,Socialism and Slavery, Preface.

[11]Blatchford,Merrie England, p. 100.

[12]Shaw,The Impossibilities of Anarchism, p. 3.

[13]"Veritas,"Did Jesus Christ teach Socialism?p. 1.

[14]Macdonald,Socialism, p. 3.

[15]Labour Record, February 1907.

[16]Webb,The Difficulties of Individualism, p. 15.

[17]Will Socialism benefit the British People?p. 4.

[18]Ball,The Moral Aspects of Socialism, p. 3.

[19]Williams,The Difficulties of Socialism, p. 3.

[20]Bebel,Woman, p. 257.

[21]Sorge,Socialism and the Worker, p. 13.

[22]Ibid.p. 16.

[23]Bax,Religion of Socialism, p. ix.

[24]Lafargue, in Bliss,Encyclopedia of Social Reform, p. 1264.

[25]Macdonald,Labour and the Empire, p. 108.

[26]Blatchford,What is this Socialism?p. 2.

[27]Justice, October 19, 1907.

[28]Keir Hardie,From Serfdom to Socialism, p. 96.

[29]Ethel Snowden,The Woman Socialist, p. 44.

[30]Gronlund,Co-operative Commonwealth, p. 126.

[31]Guyot,Pretensions of Socialism, p. 11.

[32]Hird,From Brute to Brother, p. 1.

[33]Robert Blatchford,Real Socialism, p. 15.

[34]Williams,Difficulties of Socialism, p. 4.

[35]Bliss,Encyclopedia of Social Reform, p. 1265.

Back to Index Next