187. Fort Pike was maintained for only a few years. The location proving undesirable, the troops were removed to Fort Pickering.—Ed.
187. Fort Pike was maintained for only a few years. The location proving undesirable, the troops were removed to Fort Pickering.—Ed.
188. In the day of the flatboat, a craft which went down stream and never returned, it was customary for the boatmen to return by land. This journey was often undertaken at unhealthy seasons of the year, and the death of boatmen and raftsmen was common. As the travellers usually carried large sums of money, their routes were beset by robbers who could, undoubtedly, have explained many a grave on these lonely roads.—Hulbert,Historic Highways of America, ix, pp. 125, 126.—Ed.
188. In the day of the flatboat, a craft which went down stream and never returned, it was customary for the boatmen to return by land. This journey was often undertaken at unhealthy seasons of the year, and the death of boatmen and raftsmen was common. As the travellers usually carried large sums of money, their routes were beset by robbers who could, undoubtedly, have explained many a grave on these lonely roads.—Hulbert,Historic Highways of America, ix, pp. 125, 126.—Ed.
189. For Fort Pickering, see Cuming’sTour, note 192.—Ed.
189. For Fort Pickering, see Cuming’sTour, note 192.—Ed.
190. Fort Stoddard was built in 1799 by Captain Shaumburg, U. S. A., on the Mobile River, at the Spanish boundary line provided in the treaty of 1795, and was named in honor of the acting secretary of war. It was a port of entry until Mobile became part of the United States.—Ed.
190. Fort Stoddard was built in 1799 by Captain Shaumburg, U. S. A., on the Mobile River, at the Spanish boundary line provided in the treaty of 1795, and was named in honor of the acting secretary of war. It was a port of entry until Mobile became part of the United States.—Ed.
191. For the early history of the city of Natchez, see F. A. Michaux’sTravels, vol. iii of our series, note 53.The Natchez Indians, of Maskoki stock, were first encountered by the French near the present city of their name. In 1729 they fell upon the French garrison and massacred them all. The following year the French army took a terrible revenge, a remnant only of the tribe escaping. For full account, see Gayarré,History of Louisiana(rev. ed., New-Orleans, 1903), i, pp. 396–440.—Ed.
191. For the early history of the city of Natchez, see F. A. Michaux’sTravels, vol. iii of our series, note 53.
The Natchez Indians, of Maskoki stock, were first encountered by the French near the present city of their name. In 1729 they fell upon the French garrison and massacred them all. The following year the French army took a terrible revenge, a remnant only of the tribe escaping. For full account, see Gayarré,History of Louisiana(rev. ed., New-Orleans, 1903), i, pp. 396–440.—Ed.
192. The cotton-wood is a member of the poplar family, the scientific name beingPopulus monilifera.—Ed.
192. The cotton-wood is a member of the poplar family, the scientific name beingPopulus monilifera.—Ed.
193. The China tree (Melia azedarach) is a native of India, and much cultivated in the Southern states for its shade.—Ed.
193. The China tree (Melia azedarach) is a native of India, and much cultivated in the Southern states for its shade.—Ed.
194. Point Pleasant, ten miles below New Madrid, must not be confounded with the point of that name at the mouth of Great Kanawha River.—Ed.
194. Point Pleasant, ten miles below New Madrid, must not be confounded with the point of that name at the mouth of Great Kanawha River.—Ed.
195. For an exploration of Arkansas River, see Nuttall’sJournal, vol. xiii of our series.—Ed.
195. For an exploration of Arkansas River, see Nuttall’sJournal, vol. xiii of our series.—Ed.
196. For a brief description of Loftus Heights and Fort Adams, see Cuming’sTour, volume iv of our series, note 211.—Ed.
196. For a brief description of Loftus Heights and Fort Adams, see Cuming’sTour, volume iv of our series, note 211.—Ed.
197. On Point Coupée, see Cuming’sTour, note 220.—Ed.
197. On Point Coupée, see Cuming’sTour, note 220.—Ed.
198. For an account of Baton Rouge, consult Cuming’sTour, note 215.—Ed.
198. For an account of Baton Rouge, consult Cuming’sTour, note 215.—Ed.
199. St. Louis Bay at the outlet of Lake Borgne on Mississippi Sound, was explored by Iberville in 1699 and named after Louis IX, the saintly king of France. On it was located one of the early French colonies.—Ed.
199. St. Louis Bay at the outlet of Lake Borgne on Mississippi Sound, was explored by Iberville in 1699 and named after Louis IX, the saintly king of France. On it was located one of the early French colonies.—Ed.
200. On the Ursuline convent at New-Orleans, see Cuming’sTour, volume iv of our series, note 225.—Ed.
200. On the Ursuline convent at New-Orleans, see Cuming’sTour, volume iv of our series, note 225.—Ed.
201. For a brief biography of General Wilkinson, see Cuming’sTour, note 160. The site of the battle of New-Orleans (January 8, 1815) is five miles below the city.—Ed.
201. For a brief biography of General Wilkinson, see Cuming’sTour, note 160. The site of the battle of New-Orleans (January 8, 1815) is five miles below the city.—Ed.
202. Bienville, colonial governor of Louisiana, returning from an exploring trip (1699), met an English vessel of sixteen guns, about eighteen miles below the site of New-Orleans. The captain stated he was looking for a location for an English colony, and Bienville assured him that the Mississippi was already occupied by the French. Much to the latter’s surprise, the vessel sailed away. From this episode the English Bend received its name, not, as Evans implies, from the attacking fleet of 1815.—Ed.
202. Bienville, colonial governor of Louisiana, returning from an exploring trip (1699), met an English vessel of sixteen guns, about eighteen miles below the site of New-Orleans. The captain stated he was looking for a location for an English colony, and Bienville assured him that the Mississippi was already occupied by the French. Much to the latter’s surprise, the vessel sailed away. From this episode the English Bend received its name, not, as Evans implies, from the attacking fleet of 1815.—Ed.
203. Plaquemine Turn is thirty miles from the mouth of the Mississippi. It was fortified by the French in 1746.—Ed.
203. Plaquemine Turn is thirty miles from the mouth of the Mississippi. It was fortified by the French in 1746.—Ed.
204. When, during the Seminole War, Jackson took possession of St. Marks, the Indian prophet Francis or Hellis Hajo, and the chief Hemollemico, were lured on board an American vessel (April 6, 1818) and hung by Jackson’s orders. These Indians had led the attack, the previous November, upon a boat under command of Lieutenant Scott, which was ascending the Appalachicola River. Having been forced to surrender, all survivors were tortured to death. Jackson’s act was in retaliation for this outrage.—Ed.
204. When, during the Seminole War, Jackson took possession of St. Marks, the Indian prophet Francis or Hellis Hajo, and the chief Hemollemico, were lured on board an American vessel (April 6, 1818) and hung by Jackson’s orders. These Indians had led the attack, the previous November, upon a boat under command of Lieutenant Scott, which was ascending the Appalachicola River. Having been forced to surrender, all survivors were tortured to death. Jackson’s act was in retaliation for this outrage.—Ed.
205. During Jackson’s expedition against the Seminoles, two Indian traders were also captured—Alexander Arbuthnot and Robert C. Ambrister. Both were put to death after the form of a trial, on the charge of being guilty of inciting the Seminole Indians to war against the United States. The latter was shot and the former hung from the yardarm of his vessel, April 29, 1818, at St. Marks, Florida. The execution raised a storm; Henry Clay, on the floor of the House, the following year, during the famous twelve-day debate on Jackson’s Seminole War conduct, declared that if Jackson were voted the public thanks, it would be a triumph of insubordination of military over civil authorities. The long feud between Jackson and Clay began with that speech.—Ed.
205. During Jackson’s expedition against the Seminoles, two Indian traders were also captured—Alexander Arbuthnot and Robert C. Ambrister. Both were put to death after the form of a trial, on the charge of being guilty of inciting the Seminole Indians to war against the United States. The latter was shot and the former hung from the yardarm of his vessel, April 29, 1818, at St. Marks, Florida. The execution raised a storm; Henry Clay, on the floor of the House, the following year, during the famous twelve-day debate on Jackson’s Seminole War conduct, declared that if Jackson were voted the public thanks, it would be a triumph of insubordination of military over civil authorities. The long feud between Jackson and Clay began with that speech.—Ed.
206. Adams made his strongest defense of Jackson in his letter to Don José Pizarro, Spanish secretary of state. He reviewed the whole situation, and accused the Spanish and Indian traders in Florida of stirring up the Indians, referring to Arbuthnot as “that British Indian trader from beyond the sea, the firebrand by whose touch the Negro-Indian war against our borders has been rekindled.”—Ed.
206. Adams made his strongest defense of Jackson in his letter to Don José Pizarro, Spanish secretary of state. He reviewed the whole situation, and accused the Spanish and Indian traders in Florida of stirring up the Indians, referring to Arbuthnot as “that British Indian trader from beyond the sea, the firebrand by whose touch the Negro-Indian war against our borders has been rekindled.”—Ed.
207. The Balise was in early times the best and deepest pass into the Mississippi River. Now known as South-west Pass, it is not used, there being hardly six feet of water on the bar. It was fortified by Bienville about 1720.—Ed.
207. The Balise was in early times the best and deepest pass into the Mississippi River. Now known as South-west Pass, it is not used, there being hardly six feet of water on the bar. It was fortified by Bienville about 1720.—Ed.
ImportantHistorical PublicationsOFThe Arthur H. Clark CompanyFull descriptive circulars will be mailed on application
ImportantHistorical PublicationsOFThe Arthur H. Clark CompanyFull descriptive circulars will be mailed on application
Important
Historical Publications
OF
The Arthur H. Clark Company
Full descriptive circulars will be mailed on application
“The most important project ever undertaken in the line of Philippine history in any language, above all the English.”—New-York Evening Post.
ThePhilippine Islands1493–1898Being the history of the Philippines from their discovery to the present time
ThePhilippine Islands1493–1898Being the history of the Philippines from their discovery to the present time
ThePhilippine Islands
1493–1898
Being the history of the Philippines from their discovery to the present time
Explorations by early Navigators, descriptions of the Islands and their Peoples, their History, and records of the Catholic Missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial, and religious conditions of those Islands from their earliest relations with European Nations to the end of the nineteenth century.
Translated, and edited and annotated byE. H. BlairandJ. A. Robertson,with introduction and additional notes byE. G. Bourne.
With Analytical Index and Illustrations. Limited edition, 55 volumes, large 8vo, cloth, uncut, gilt top. Price $4.00 net per volume.
“The almost total lack of acceptable material on Philippine history in English gives this undertaking an immediate value.”
—James A. Le RoyinAmerican Historical Review.
—James A. Le RoyinAmerican Historical Review.
—James A. Le RoyinAmerican Historical Review.
—James A. Le RoyinAmerican Historical Review.
“With our freshened interest in the Far East, American readers ought not to neglect the new possessions in that region which now fly the Stars and Stripes.”—Chicago Evening Post.
“Now at least there should be no difficulty for the American student to gain a clear view of the difficulties which both the Spaniards and their successors have had to contend with in these islands, when they have this work before them, and have not, as formerly, to obtain information from obscure Spanish sources, in a language hitherto comparatively little studied in the United States, ... welcome to all students of the Far East.”
—English Historical Review.
—English Historical Review.
—English Historical Review.
—English Historical Review.
“The bare title hardly conveys an idea of the interesting lore embraced in this admirably carried out study of the roads and their part in the development of the country.”—Boston Globe.
The Historic Highways of AmericabyArcher Butler HulbertA series of monographs on the History of America as portrayed in the evolution of its highways of War, Commerce, and Social Expansion.
The Historic Highways of AmericabyArcher Butler HulbertA series of monographs on the History of America as portrayed in the evolution of its highways of War, Commerce, and Social Expansion.
The Historic Highways of America
byArcher Butler Hulbert
A series of monographs on the History of America as portrayed in the evolution of its highways of War, Commerce, and Social Expansion.
Comprising the following volumes:
Sixteen volumes, crown 8vo, cloth, uncut, gilt tops. ALIMITED EDITIONonly printed direct from type, and the type distributed. Each volume handsomely printed in large type on Dickinson’s hand-made paper, and illustrated with maps, plates, and facsimiles.
Published a volume each two months, beginning September, 1902.
Price, volumes 1 and 2, $2.00 net each; volumes 3 to 16, $2.50 net each.
Fifty sets printed on large paper, each numbered andsigned by the author. Bound in cloth, with paper label, uncut, gilt tops. Price, $5.00 net per volume.
“The history of American trails and carries in colonial times; of paths, roads, and highways in our national beginnings; and of our great lake, river, and railroad traffic in later times is and has been of the first importance in our social and political history. Mr. Hulbert has shown himself abundantly able to investigate the subject and put in good form the results of his labors.”
—ProfessorWilliam M. Sloane,Princeton University.
—ProfessorWilliam M. Sloane,Princeton University.
—ProfessorWilliam M. Sloane,Princeton University.
—ProfessorWilliam M. Sloane,Princeton University.
“Mr. Hulbert has evidently mastered his subject, and has treated it very ably and enthusiastically. History is too frequently a mere collection of dry bones, but here we have a book which, when once begun, will be read eagerly to the end, so vividly does the author bring scenes and personages before us.”—Current Literature.
“As in the prior volumes, the general effect is that of a most entertaining series. The charm of the style is evident.”—American Historical Review.
“His style is effective ... an invaluable contribution to the makings of American History.”—New-York Evening Post.
“Should fill an important and unoccupied place in American historical literature.”
—The Dial.
—The Dial.
—The Dial.
—The Dial.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTESTypos fixed; non-standard spelling and dialect retained.Used numbers for footnotes, placing them all at the end of the last chapter.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES