IV. THEOLOGY AND ITS BATTLES.§ 90. Scholarship and Theological Science.252With the exception of Ulfilas’ famous efforts, the Arian period of German church history is quite barren in scientific performances. Yet those few who preserved and fostered the scientific gains of earlier times were honoured and made use of by the noble-minded Ostrogoth king Theodoric, and under him Boethius [Boëthius] and Cassiodorus (§47, 23) performed the praiseworthy task of saving the remnants of classical and patristic learning. For Spain the same office was performed by Isidore of Seville, who died inA.D.636, whose text-books continued for centuries, even on this side the Pyrenees, to supply the groundwork of scholarly studies. The numerous Scottish and Irish monasteries maintained their reputation down to the 9th century for eminent piety and distinguished scholarship. Among the Anglo-Saxons the learned Greek monk Theodore of Tarsus, who died inA.D.690, and his companion Hadrian, enkindled an enthusiasm for classical studies, and the venerable Bede, who died inA.D.735, though he never quitted his monastery, became the most famous teacher in all the West, The Danish pirates did indeed crush almost to extinction the seeds of Anglo-Saxon culture, but Alfred the Great sowed them anew, though this revival was only for a little while. In Gaul Gregory of Tours, who died inA.D.595, was the last representative of Roman ecclesiastical learning. After him we enter upon a chaos without form and void, from which the creative spirit of Charlemagne first called a new day which spread over the whole West its enlightening beams. This light, however, was put out even by the time of the great emperor’s grandson, and then we suddenly pass into the night of theSæculum Obscurum(§ 100).
With the exception of Ulfilas’ famous efforts, the Arian period of German church history is quite barren in scientific performances. Yet those few who preserved and fostered the scientific gains of earlier times were honoured and made use of by the noble-minded Ostrogoth king Theodoric, and under him Boethius [Boëthius] and Cassiodorus (§47, 23) performed the praiseworthy task of saving the remnants of classical and patristic learning. For Spain the same office was performed by Isidore of Seville, who died inA.D.636, whose text-books continued for centuries, even on this side the Pyrenees, to supply the groundwork of scholarly studies. The numerous Scottish and Irish monasteries maintained their reputation down to the 9th century for eminent piety and distinguished scholarship. Among the Anglo-Saxons the learned Greek monk Theodore of Tarsus, who died inA.D.690, and his companion Hadrian, enkindled an enthusiasm for classical studies, and the venerable Bede, who died inA.D.735, though he never quitted his monastery, became the most famous teacher in all the West, The Danish pirates did indeed crush almost to extinction the seeds of Anglo-Saxon culture, but Alfred the Great sowed them anew, though this revival was only for a little while. In Gaul Gregory of Tours, who died inA.D.595, was the last representative of Roman ecclesiastical learning. After him we enter upon a chaos without form and void, from which the creative spirit of Charlemagne first called a new day which spread over the whole West its enlightening beams. This light, however, was put out even by the time of the great emperor’s grandson, and then we suddenly pass into the night of theSæculum Obscurum(§ 100).
§ 90.1.Rulers of the Carolingian Line.—Charlemagne,A.D.768-814, may be regarded as beginning his scientific undertakings on his first entrance into Italy inA.D.774. On this occasion he came to know the scholars Peter of Pisa, Paul Warnefrid, Paulinus of Aquileia, and Theodulf of Orleans, and brought them to his palace. FromA.D.782, however, the particularly brilliant star of his court was the Anglo-Saxon scholar Alcuin, whom Charles had met in Italy in the previous year. Scientific studies were now carried on in an exceedingly vigorous manner in the palace. The royal family, the whole court and its surroundings engaged upon them, but of them all Charles himself was the most diligent and successful of Alcuin’s students. In the royal school,Schola palatina, which was ambulatory like the royal residence itself, the sons and daughters of the king with the children of the most distinguished families of the land received a high-class education. The teaching staff was constantly recruited from England, Ireland and Italy. After such preparations Charles issued inA.D.787 a circular to all the bishops and abbots of his kingdom which enjoined under threat of his severe royal displeasure that schools should be erected in all monasteries and cathedral churches. Meanwhile his endeavours were most successful, but were rather one-sided in the preference given to classical and patristic literature, without a proper national foundation. Charles’s great and generous nature indeed had a warm interest in national culture, but those around him, with the single exception of Paul Warnefrid, had in consequence of their Latin monkish training lost all taste for German thought, language and nationality, and fearing lest such studies might endanger Christianity and cause a relapse into paganism, they did not help but rather hindered the king’s effort to promote a national literature.—Louis the Pious,A.D.814-840, had his weak government disturbed by the strifes of parties and of the citizens. This period, therefore, was not specially favourable to the development of scientific studies, but the seed sown by his father still bore noble fruit. His son Lothair issued an ordinance which gave a new organization to the educational system of Italy, indeed created it anew. But Italy restless and full of factions was the land where least of all such institutions could be successfully conducted.A new golden age, however, dawned for France underCharles the Bald,A.D.840-877. His court resembled that of his great grandfather in having gathered to it the élite of scholars from all the West. The royal school gained new renown under the direction ofJoannes Scotus Erigena. The cathedral and monastic schools of France vied with the most famous institutions of Germany (St. Gall, Fulda, Reichenau, etc.), and over the French episcopal sees men presided who had the most distinguished reputation for scholarship. But after Charles’s death the bloom of the Carolingian period passed away with almost inconceivable rapidity amid the commotions of the time into thick darkness, chaos and barbarism.§ 90.2.The most distinguished Theologians of the Pre-Carolingian Age.In Merovingian France flourishedGregory of Tours, sprung of a good Roman family. When inA.D.573, in order to get cured of an illness, he made a pilgrimage to the tomb of St. Martin (§47, 14), he had the bishopric of Tours conferred upon him, where he continued till his death inA.D.595. HisHistoria Ecclesiastica Francorumin ten Bks. affords us the only exact and trustworthy information we possess of the Merovingian age. TheLl. VII. Miraculorumare a collection of several hagiographic writings, four of them recounting some of the innumerable miracles of St. Martin.Scientific studies were prosecuted more vigorously on the other side of the Pyrenees than on this. In the empire of the Suevi (§76, 4) archbishopMartin of Braccara, now Braga, distinguished himself in the work of Catholicising the Arian population. He was previously abbot of the monastery of Dumio, and died aboutA.D.580. He was a voluminous writer on church law and also in the departments of moral and ascetical theology. His writings in the latter section have so much in common with those of Seneca that they were at one time ascribed to the Roman moralist. The treatiseDe Correctione Rusticorumis very important for the history of the morals, legal institutions and culture of that period.—The great star of the Spanish Visigothic kingdom wasIsidorus [Isidore] Hispalensis, who died inA.D.636. He was descended from a distinguished Gothic family, and, as successor of his brother Leander, rose to the archbishopric of Seville (Hispalis). His writings are diligent compilations, which have preserved to us many fragments and items of information otherwise unknown. Incomparably greater, however, was the service they rendered in conveying classical and patristic learning to the German world of that age. His most comprehensive work consists of xx. Bks.Originum s. Etymologiarum, an encyclopædic exhibition of the whole field of knowledge of the day. He also wrote aChroniconreaching down toA.D.627, andHist. de regibus Gotorum, a shorterHist. Vandalorum et Suevorum, and a continuation of Jerome’sCatalogus de viris illustr. Of more importance than his numerous compilations of mystico-allegorical expositions of Scripture are the iii. Bks.Sententiarum, a well-arranged system of doctrine and morals from patristic passages, especially from Augustine and Gregory the Great, and theLb. II. de ecclest. officiis. The two last-named works were highly prized as text-books throughout the Middle Ages. The two booksContra Judæosbelong to the department of apologetics. He also composed a monastic rule (comp. further §87, 1and88, 1).—Isidore’s elder brotherLeander of Seville, who died inA.D.590, had a good reputation as a church leader (§76, 2;88, 1), and had no insignificant rank as a theological writer. The same may be said of the two bishops of Toledo,Ildefonsus, who died inA.D.669, andJulianus, who died inA.D.690.England’s greatest and most famous teacher was the Anglo-Saxon, theVenerable Bede. Trained in the monastery of Wearmouth, he subsequently took up his residence in the monastery of Jarrow, where he died inA.D.735. He was a proficient in all the sciences of his time and withal a model of humility, piety and amiability. While his numerous pupils reached the highest places in the service of the church, their famous teacher continued in quiet retirement as a simple monk. He himself wished nothing else. Even on his deathbed he continued unweariedly to teach and write. Immediately before his death he dictated the last chapter of an Anglo-Saxon translation of the Gospel of John. By far his most important work for us is theHist. ecclest. gentis Anglorumin 5 Bks. reaching down toA.D.731 (Engl. Transl. by Giles, Lond., 1840; and by Gidley, Lond., 1871). Connected with this are his biographies of several saints of his native land, also a history of the monastery of Wearmouth, and aChronicon de sex ætatibus mundireaching down toA.D.729. His commentaries ranging over almost all the books of the Old and New Testament give evidence of a wonderful knowledge of the fathers. His numerous sermons are mostly exegetical and practical, rarely doctrinal. He was distinguished too as a poet in Latin as well as in his mother tongue.§ 90.3.The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charlemagne.The brightest star in the theological firmament of this period was the Anglo-SaxonAlcuin(Albinus) with the Horatian surname of Flaccus, which he got for his poetical productions. He was educated in the famous school of York under Egbert and Elbert. When the latter was made archbishop inA.D.766, Alcuin undertook the presidency of the schools. While on a visit to Rome inA.D.781 he met Charlemagne who took him to his court, where he became the emperor’s teacher, friend and most trusted counsellor. Down to his death inA.D.804 he was the king’s right hand in all religious ecclesiastical and educational matters. In order to allay a feeling of home-sickness, he undertook a journey inA.D.789 to his native country as ambassador of Charlemagne, returned inA.D.793, and did not again quit France. InA.D.796 Charles gave him the abbacy of Tours. He soon raised its monastic school to the highest rank as a seminary of learning. His exegetical works are mere compilations. TheLl. II. de fide s. et Individuæ Trinitatismay be regarded as his dogmatic masterpiece; a compendium of dogmatics based upon Augustine’s writings. TheQuæstiones de Trin.treat of the same matter in the catechetical form of question and answer. He contributed to the doctrinal controversies of his time theLibellus de processione Spiritus S.(§91, 2) and by several learned controversial tracts against the leaders of the Adoptionists (§91, 1). It is doubtful whether at all, and if so to what extent, he had to do with the composition of theLibri Carolini(§ 94, 1) which appeared during his stay in England. His numerous epistles, about 300 in number, are very important for the history of his times.In his Latin poems he sometimes very happily imitates his classical models.253Paulus Diaconusor Paul (the son of) Warnefrid, of an honourable Longobard family, was next to Alcuin the most distinguished scholar of his age. Probably sorrow at the overthrow of his people (§82, 2) drove him into the monastery of Monte Cassino; but Charlemagne took him to his court inA.D.782, where he was an object of admiration as a Homer among the Grecians, a Virgil, Horace, Tibullus, among the Latinists, and a Philo (!) among the Hebraists. Love of his native land, however, led him back to his monastery inA.D.786, where he died at a very advanced age inA.D.795. What was specially praiseworthy in this learned and amiable man, all the more that few then took interest in those matters, was love and enthusiasm for the language, the national legends and heroic tales, the old laws and customs of his fellow-countrymen. His most important work is theHistoria s. de Gestis Langobardorumin 6 bks., reaching down toA.D.774. The earlierHist. Romana, composed at the wish of a daughter of king Desiderius, is, so far as its earlier periods are concerned, compiled from the classical historians, but for the later periods down to the overthrow of the Gothic rule is more independent. At the Frankish court he composed theHist. Episcoporum Mettensium.He was also distinguished as a poet. On hisHomiliariuscomp. §88, 1.254Theodulf, bishop of Orleans, distinguished as a Christian poet and learned theologian, and especially as a promoter of popular education, stood in high repute with Charlemagne, but under Louis the Pious, being suspected of treasonable correspondence with Bernard of Italy, was deposed and banished inA.D.818. Subsequently, however, he was pardoned and recalled, but died inA.D.821 before he reached his diocese. His bookDe Spiritu S.was a contribution to the controversy about the procession of the Holy Spirit (§91, 2). At Charlemagne’s request he described and explained the baptismal ceremony in the bookDe ordine baptismi. His numerous poems have been published in 6 bks.Paulinus, patriarch of Aquileia, who died inA.D.804, and bishopLeidrad of Lyons, who died inA.D.813, took part in Alcuin’s controversy against the Adoptionists by the publication of able treatises.Of the works ofHatto, abbot of Reichenau, subsequently bishop of Basel, who died inA.D.836, we still have the so-calledCapitulare Hattonis, with prefatory directions for the official guidance of the Basel clergy, and theVisio Wettini, describing the vision of a monk of Reichenau called Wettin, who inA.D.824 three days before his death was conducted by an angel through hell, purgatory and paradise. Hatto wrote it in prose and Walafrid Strabo rendered it into verse. It made a great impression on his contemporaries and was probably not without influence upon Dante’sDivina Comediá.§ 90.4.The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Louis the Pious.Agobard of Lyons, a Spaniard by birth, died as archbishop of Lyons inA.D.840. As the resolute defender of the integrity of the empire and the head of the national church party among the Frankish clergy, he was drawn into a conspiracy against Louis the Pious inA.D.833 (§82, 4), which led to his deposition and banishment inA.D.835. After two years, however, he was pardoned. He was a man of remarkable culture and extraordinary force of character, and withal a vigorous opponent of all ecclesiastical and extra-ecclesiastical superstition. On his writings referring to these matters see §92, 2. In the bookAdv. dogma Felicishe contended against Adoptionism (§91, 1). In connection with his battle against the insolence and pride of the numerous and wealthy Jews in his diocese he wrote and dedicated to the emperor the accusatory tractDe insolentia Judæorum, followed by several similar addresses to the most influential councillors of the crown. Another series of writings from his pen was devoted to the vindication of the attitude which he had assumed in the struggle between Louis the Pious and his sons. Several treatises on the position and task, the rights and duties of the ministerial office show a reformatory tendency. He engaged in a passionate controversy with Amalarius of Metz about the necessity of a liturgical reform. Against Fredigis of Tours, Alcuin’s successor, he maintained the view regarding the prophets and apostles that the Holy Spiritnon solum sensum prædicationis et modos vel argumenta dictionum inspiraverit, sed etiam ipsa corporalia verba extrinsecus in ora illorum ipse formaverit.Claudius, bishop of Turin, who died inA.D.839, was also a Spaniard by birth and a scholar of Felix of Urgel (§91, 1), without, however, imbibing his heretical views. He was throughout his whole career a zealous and determined reformer. His reformatory notions were set forth first of all in his exegetical works that covered almost the whole range of Scripture. Of these only the commentary on Galatians is now extant. He also vindicated his position against the attacks of his old friend the abbot Theodemir in hisApologeticus(§92, 2).Jonas of Orleans, the successor of Theodulf, was one of the most distinguished prelates of his age, who wrought earnestly and successfully for the restoring of discipline and order in his diocese. In the struggle between Louis the Pious and his sons he resolutely took the side of the old king. He died inA.D.844. His three books,De institutione laicaliconstitute a handbook of morals for married persons, which also, because it deals with the sins and vices that were then rampant, is of value as a picture of the moral condition of his age. The bookDe institutione regia, addressed to Louis’ son Pepin, may be regarded as an appendix to the former treatise. In opposition to the iconoclastic opinions of Claudius (§92, 2) he wroteLl. III. De cultu imaginum.The principal work of the priestAmalarius of Metzis hisDe ecclesiasticis officiisin 4 bks., a detailed description of all the ceremonies of public worship and the ecclesiastical furniture and vestments, with many arbitrary mystico-allegorical explanations, which called forth a crushing rejoinder from Agobard. On his revision of the rule of Chrodegang, see §84, 4.From the pen of the German monkChristian Druthmarof Old Corbei we have a commentary on Matthew, which is remarkable for the doctrine of the Lord’s Supper which it sets forth (§91, 3), as well as for the hermeneutical principle there laid down, that first and foremost the exegete must secure a thorough understanding of the historical literal sense, before he may think of developing the spiritual sense, which must have the former as its basis.Rabănus [Rabanus] Magnentius Maurus, the most distinguished scholar of his age, was descended from an old Roman family but one that had long been Germanized at Mainz. His earliest education was received at the monastery of Fulda. He then became a pupil of Alcuin at Tours. InA.D.803 he became himself a teacher at Tours, and inA.D.822 was made abbot of Fulda. After the death of Louis the Pious he took the side of Lothair against Louis the German, and was consequently obliged to resign his position as abbot and to quit Fulda inA.D.842. Subsequently, however, he obtained Louis’ favour, and upon Otgar’s death inA.D.847 (§87, 3) was appointed his successor in the archiepiscopal see of Mainz. He died inA.D.856. The monastic school at Fulda was raised by him to the highest eminence. His commentaries extending over almost all the Old and New Testaments are mainly occupied with the development of the so-called spiritual sense, manifest wonderful familiarity with the writings of the Latin fathers from Ambrose to Bede, and were held in the highest esteem throughout the Middle Ages. The same may be said of his numerous homilies. The encyclopædic workDe universoin 22 bks., is a continuation of Isidore’sOrigines. His bookDe institutione clericorumin 3 bks. affords a summary of all that was then to be learnt by the clergy for the practical work of the ministry. TheTractatus de diversis quæstionibus ex V. et N. T. contra Judæosis an apologetic treatise. He wrote against Gottschalk’s doctrine of predestination in a letter to bishop Noting of Verona (§91, 5), and another to the abbot Eigil of Prüm against Radbert’s doctrine of the Lord’s Supper (§91, 3). Of his many other works we may mention aMartyrologiumbased upon ancient authorities.Walafrid Straboreceived his early training in the monastery of Reichenau. He studied subsequently under Rabanus at Fulda, in which institution he became a teacher. AboutA.D.842 he was made abbot of Reichenau; the seminary here he raised to high repute, although he died in his early prime inA.D.849. Among his evangelical writings his so-calledGlossæ ordinariæ,i.e.short explanations of the Latin text of the Bible, mostly culled from the commentaries of Rabanus, were extremely popular, and continued in use throughout the Middle Ages as an exegetical handbook. In the liturgical department we have his treatiseDe exordiis et incrementis rerum ecclesiasticarum, in which he expresses himself on the image controversy in the spirit of the old Frankish church (§92, 1). Walafrid was also famous as a writer of sacred and secular poems.§ 90.5.The Most Distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charles the Bald.The powerful metropolitanHincmar of Rheims, who died inA.D.882 (§82, 7;83, 2), was not indeed strong in dogmatics, but in his writings just as well as in his life and struggle he was heart and soul a church leader and statesman. His most important work from a theological point of view is theCapitula Synodica ad presbyteros parochiæ suæon various points of worship and discipline, a notable witness to the zeal and care which this man, so much taken up with affairs of state and ecclesiastical controversies, showed in the discharge of his ministerial duties. Of his writings in connection with the Gottschalk controversy (§91, 5,6) only the prolix workDe predest. Dei et libero arbitriovindicating the decrees of Quiersy ofA.D.853 are now extant.Paschasius Radbertus, who died aboutA.D.865, was monk, and, fromA.D.844-851, also abbot of the monastery of Corbei in Picardy. But among the monks of that place there was a cotery which occasioned the most profound grief to the pious-minded abbot; especially the learned monk Ratramnus under the protection of court favour took delight in contesting the somewhat ultra-pietistic views of his abbot. Probably it was this that led Radbertus to resign his office inA.D.851. Besides the two treatises controverted by Ratramnus he composed biblical commentaries, which are more independent and contain more of his own than was common at that time. He also wrote 3 bks. on faith, love and hope; besides several Hagiographies.Ratramnus, the antagonist of the former, takes a very prominent place among the clear and subtle thinkers of that age. Besides his controversial treatises against Radbertus (§91, 3,4) and against Hincmar (§91, 5,6), he took part in the burning controversy between the Greeks and Latins (§67, 1) and wrote,Contra Græcorum opposita Romanam eccl. infamantium.Florus Magisterwas a cleric of the diocese of Lyons distinguished no less for great learning than for poetic gifts. His principal workDe actione Missarum, s. expositio in Canonem Missæis, notwithstanding its title, not so much a liturgical treatise as a controversial tract against Radbertus’ doctrine of the Eucharist (§91, 3). In the liturgical controversy between Agobard and Amalarius, he took the side of Agobard and argued against Amalarius in several epistles. In the predestinarian controversy he published the workContra J. Scoti Erigenæ erroneas definitiones(§91, 5). He also composed aMartyrologium.Haymo, bishop of Halberstadt, who died inA.D.853, won great reputation not only by his compiled exegetical works and hisHomiliariumfor the festival part of the year, but also as author of a Church History, which, however, is nothing more than a working up of extracts from Rufinus.Servatus Lupus, scholar of Rabanus, was fromA.D.842 abbot of Ferrières. His 130 epistles are important for the history of his time, as he was in constant correspondence with the most famous men of his day. On the side of Gottschalk in the predestinarian controversy he wrote his treatiseDe tribus quæstionibus.Remigius of Auxerre, who died aboutA.D.908, was teacher of the monastic school at Rheims, and subsequently at Paris. Besides numerous commentaries on the books of the Old and New Testaments in the usual compilatory and allegorical style, he has left in hisExpositio Missæa mystico-allegorical explanation of the ceremonies of the mass.Regius of Prüm, abbot of the monastery there, subsequently resigned his rank and retired into the monastery of Treves. He died inA.D.915. HisChroniconreaching down toA.D.906 is of great value for his own times. His 2 bks.De cantis synodalibus et disciplinis ecclesiasticisare a directory for the visitation of churches to be carried out by means of synodical judicatures.§ 90.6.Anastasius Bibliothecariuswas abbot of a Roman monastery and librarian under popes Nicholas I., Hadrian II. and John VIII., and visited the Byzantine court inA.D.869 as member of an embassy of Emperor Louis II., and was also present at the 8th œcumenical Council at Constantinople (§67, 1). He translated the acts of this synod into Latin, wrote the lives of several saints, and composed aHist. ecclest. s. Chronographia tripartitadrawn from three Byzantine historical works of that period. To theLiber Pontificalis s. de vitio Roman. pontificum, reaching down to the death of Stephen V. inA.D.891, which has been ascribed to him, he can only have contributed theVitaof pope Nicholas I., and perhaps also theVitæof his four immediate predecessors. It is a history of the popes gathered together from various sources that had their origin at different times, the earliest of which goes back toA.D.354. The oldest extant recension of it reaches down to Pope Conon inA.D.687, and forms an important link in the chain of Romish fabrications and interpolations, by means of which the numerous fabricated acts of Romish martyrs, as well as already existing fables referring to particular popes and emperors (comp.e.g.§42, 1), gained credence, more recently introduced liturgical practices had assigned to them a more remote antiquity, and the popes were represented as legislators for the whole church. The complete biographies often written by contemporaries preserved in this collection are of great historical value.Eulogius of Cordovawas chosen archbishop inA.D.858, but was not received by the Moorish government, and suffered martyrdom inA.D.859 (§81, 1). The most important of his writings is the historicalMemoriale Sanctorum s. Ll. III. de Martyrib. Cordubens. TheApologeticus Sanctorumis a continuation of the former with violent invectives against Islam and its false prophet.Paulas [Paul] Alvarusof Cordova, from his youth closely associated with Eulogius, wrote his life and vindicated in aJudiculus luminosusthe tendency to court martyrdom then frequently shown by Christians but often objected to.§ 90.7.Joannes Scotus Erigena, the miracle as well as the enigma of his age, by birth probably an Irishman, who flashed out as a brilliant meteor in the court of Charles the Bald and passed away from view, without its being known whence he came or whither he went, was the greatest scholar, the most profound, subtle and liberal thinker of his times, with a speculative power the like of which was not seen for centuries before and after. He died afterA.D.877. His extant works embrace fragments of his commentary on the Areopagite (§47, 11), and a Latin faithful, literal and therefore hard to understand translation of the Areopagite’s writings, also a translation of a work of Maximus Confessor on difficult passages from the writings of Gregory Nazianzen (Loca ambigua), his controversial treatiseDe prædestinatione(§91, 5), a homily on the prologue of John’s gospel, a fragment of a speculative-mystical treatiseDe egressu et regressu animæ ad Deum, and theOpus palmareof the author, by far the most comprehensive of his writings, the 5 bks.De divisione naturæ. Based upon the gnosis of the school of Origen, but resting mainly on the theosophical mysticism of the Areopagite and the dialectic of Maximus Confessor, he produced in this treatise a system of speculative theology of magnificent dimensions which, in spite of every effort to hold by the doctrinal position of the church, is but one piece of heterodoxy from beginning to end. He starts from the principle that true theology and true philosophy are only formally different, but essentially identical. TheFideshave to express the truth asTheologia affirmativa(καταφατική) in the biblically revealed and ecclesiastically communicated shell, accommodating itself to the finite understanding by figurative and metaphorical expressions. But the task of theRatiois to strip off this shell (Theologia negativa, ἀποφατική), and by means of speculation raise the faith to knowledge. The title of this book is to be explained from its fundamental thought that nature,i.e.the sum of all being and non-being, by which he understands everything the existence of which is yet unknown, or merely potential, or necessarily belonging to things past, comprises four forms of existence:—Natura creatrix non creata,i.e.God as the potential sum of all being,Natura creatrix creata,i.e.the eternal thoughts of God regarding the world as the eternal primal types of all creation,Natura creata non creans,i.e.the world in time as the visible product and sensible realization of the eternal invisible world of ideas, andNatura nee creata nee creans,i.e.God as the final end of all created being, to whom all creation when all contradictions have been overcome returns in the ἀποκατάστασις τῶν πάντων. The Aristotelian threefold division into the unmoved and moving, the moved and moving, and the moved and not moving, seems to have afforded him the starting-point for his fourfold division; while the divergent conception of them, their enlargement and development may be traced to Platonic and Neo-Platonic influences.—That such a system must essentially tend to pantheism soon became evident, but on the other hand Erigena’s own Christian consciousness strongly reacted against the pantheistic current of his thought, and he was anxiously concerned to preserve the fundamental truths of Christian Theism. By the fundamental fourfold division of his system he could not give to the doctrine of the Trinity a necessary and controlling but only an accidental and occasional position. Only the presence of this doctrine in Scripture and tradition obliged him to maintain it. He speaks indeed of three persons in God, but he uses the expression only in an improper sense, and has no intention of explaining Father, Son and Spirit as mere names of divine relations (habitudines,relationes):Pater vult, Filius facit, Spir. S. perficit. In the Son as the creative Word of God are all original causes of things, undistinguished, unordered; by the Spirit are they differentiated into the various phenomena and effects in the kingdom of nature as well as of grace. On his doctrine of evil, comp. §91, 5. As Origen has in himself the germs of all orthodoxy and heterodoxy of the ancient church undeveloped and uncontrasted, so also in Erigena are there the germs of the contradictions of later scholasticism and mysticism. Had he lived three centuries later he would probably have set the whole learned world astir, but now he passed unhonoured, misunderstood, scarcely regarded worth dealing with for heresy (§91, 5), and apparently leaving little trace behind him. His great workDe divisione naturæwas first condemned by a provincial Council at Sens, and this judgment was confirmed by Honorius III. inA.D.1225.The book was characterized asScatens vermibus hæreticæ pravitatis; orders were given that it should be sought out everywhere and burnt.255§ 90.8.The Monastic and Cathedral Schoolshad as their main task the training of capable servants for the church. The handbooks mainly in use were those of Cassiodorus, Isidore, Bede, Alcuin and Rabanus. Great diligence was shown, especially in the monasteries, in founding libraries and multiplying books by means of good copies. Alcuin made a threefold division of all sciences; ethics, physics and theology. Ethics corresponded to what was afterwards called the Trivium (Grammar, Rhetoric and Dialectic); Physics to the Quadrivium (Arithmetic, Geometry, Music and Astronomy). These two together comprehended the whole range of the sevenfreearts,i.e.worthy of the study of a free man, liberal studies. Latin was the language of intercourse and instruction. Greek, which was spread by Theodore of Tarsus, a Greek monk, who, after being long a teacher in Rome, was inA.D.669 made archbishop of Canterbury, and by his pupils was also taught in the more important schools. Acquaintance with Hebrew was much more rare, and was often obtained by means of intercourse with learned Jews. Boethius [Boëthius] was the vehicle of instruction in philosophy. In the 9th century the works ascribed to Dionysius the Areopagite (§47, 11) were sent to France as a present from the Byzantine emperor Michael to Louis of France. He was identified with the founder of the church of Paris of the same name, and patriotic feeling gave an immense impulse to the study of his writings. The abbot Hildmin of St. Denys, and subsequently Joannes Erigena, translated them into Latin.Encyclopædic works, giving compendiums of the whole range of the sciences then known, were produced by Isidore and Rabanus.256—Continuation, § 99, 3.§ 90.9.Various Branches of Theological Science.—The labours of the German church in the department of scientific theology was directed to the church’s immediate needs, and hence the character of its theology was biblical and practical, and the reputation of the fathers so extravagantly high, that wherever it was possible, teaching, preaching, proving and refuting were all carried on in their very words. Charlemagne’s powerful efforts in the direction of reform gave even in the department of theology abundant occasion and encouragement to scholars round about him to a more independent procedure, and the theological controversies of the 9th century afforded sufficient scope to independent thinking.Exegesison the basis of the Vulgate was most diligently prosecuted. Charlemagne set Alcuin to produce a critical revision of its very corrupt text. Agobard combated the mechanical theory of inspiration by the assertion that the holy prophets were something better than Balaam’s ass. Only one out of the very numerous exegetes, Christian Druthmar, recognised it as a first principle, most essential and necessary, if not the only task of the exegete, to bring out the grammatical and historical sense of the words of Scripture. The literal sense was and continued to be regarded as the scullion of interpretation, while it was thought that the most precious treasures of Divine wisdom were to be found in theallegoricalsense,i.e.with application to the mysteries of the faith, thetropologicalor moral, and theanagogical, which aimed at the elevation of the mind.InSystematic TheologyApologetics was most feebly represented. The humble form of the paganism to be controverted did not require elaborate defences of the Christian faith, but the advance of Mohammedanism and the great number of Jews established in France, especially under Louis of France, by means of their wealth and bribes, developed an incredible arrogance. While Jewish and pagan slaves were not allowed to have baptism, Christian slaves on the other hand were compelled to observe the Sabbath, to work on Sunday, to eat flesh on fast days; they openly blasphemed Christ, insulted the church and sold Christian slaves to the Saracens. Agobard fought against them energetically by word, Scripture and action, but the needy court protected them. Isidore and Rabanus in their apologetical writings proved the nullity of the Jewish beliefs. From the time of Charlemagne theologians were much more eagerly engaged in polemics (§§91,92). Isidore in hisLl. III. Sententiarumcollected from patristic passages a system of doctrine and morals, which continued a favourite text-book for centuries. Alcuin’sLl. III. De fide Trinitatisform a compendium of dogmatics. The introduction of the Pseudo-Areopagita into the West prepared the way for speculative mysticism, which had its first representative in Joannes Scotus Erigena.InPractical Theologyhomiletical literature was but poorly represented. Besides the Homiliarius of Paul Warnefrid (§88, 1), we meet with Bede, Walafrid, Rabanus and Haymo as authors of sermons. On the other hand great and constant interest was shown in developing a theory of worship, in describing it and giving a mystical explanation of it. Isidore withDe officiis ecclesiasticiswas the first in this department. Charlemagne set to all his theologians the task of explaining the baptismal ceremony. In the time of Louis the Pious, Agobard appears as a reformer of the liturgy, in connection with which he passionately contended against Amalarius, against whom also Florus Magister entered the lists. Important works in this department were also written by Rabanus, Walafrid and Remigius. On works treating of church law and church discipline, see §87and §89, 5.Finally, as to the department ofHistorical Theologyall knowledge of earlier church history was derived from Rufinus and Cassiodorus. Even Haymo’s Church History is made up simply of extracts from Rufinus. All the greater diligence was shown throughout the Middle Ages in chronicling the ecclesiastical and political events of the immediate present and also keeping the past in memory. This endeavour shows itself in a threefold direction. (a) The writing ofNational Chronicles.The Visigoths had their Isidore, the Ostrogoths their Cassiodorus,257the Longobards their Paul Warnefrid, the Franks their Gregory of Tours, the Britons their Gildas258and Nennius,259the Anglo-Saxons their Bede.—(b) Then we have the clumsy compilations ofAnnalsandChronicleswhich most monasteries produced, and which were continued from year to year.—(c) And further,Biographies, both of distinguished statesmen and distinguished churchmen. TheVitæ Sanctorumare innumerable, mostly quite uncritical, composed purely for the glorification of some local saint. To this category belong the numerousMartyrologies, arranged in the order of the Calendar. Among the most famous were those prepared by Bede, Ado of Vienne, Usuardus, Rabanus, Notker Balbulus, Wandelbert, etc. In the department of historical biography proper may be included the portion of theLiber pontificalisbelonging to this period, theHist. Mettensium Episcoporumof Paul Warnefrid, and Isidore’s continuation of Jerome’sCatalogus, which was further continued by Ildefonsus of Toledo.§ 90.10.Anglo-Saxon Culture under Alfred the Great,A.D.871-901.—Alfred the Great, the greatest and noblest of all the kings that England has ever had, was the grandson of Egbert who had united inA.D.827 the seven Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. When five years old he received papal anointing at Rome and two years later in company with his pious father he travelled thence, made a considerable stay at the brilliant court of Charlemagne where he received the impress of its superior culture, and began his reign inA.D.871 in his 22nd year when the kingdom was sorely oppressed by Danish invasions. He applied all the energy of his mind to the difficult problems of government, to the emancipation and civilization of his country and people by driving out the Danish robbers, and then improving the internal condition of the land by attention to agriculture, industry and trade, by a wise organization, legislation and administration, by the founding of churches, monasteries and schools, and by furthering every scientific endeavour from a thoroughly national point of view. When already thirty-six years of age he learnt the Latin language and used this acquirement for the enriching of Anglo-Saxon literature by translations from his own hand, with many important additions of his own, of Boëthius’Consolatio philosophiæ, the Universal History of Orosius, Bede’s History of the Church of England and theRegula pastoralisof Gregory the Great. He also began a translation of the Psalms.He stimulated his learned friends to a like activity, among whom bishop Asser of Sherborne in hisVita Alfredi(Engl. transl. in “Six Old English Chronicles”) has reared a worthy memorial of his master.260—Continuation, § 100, 1.
§ 90.1.Rulers of the Carolingian Line.—Charlemagne,A.D.768-814, may be regarded as beginning his scientific undertakings on his first entrance into Italy inA.D.774. On this occasion he came to know the scholars Peter of Pisa, Paul Warnefrid, Paulinus of Aquileia, and Theodulf of Orleans, and brought them to his palace. FromA.D.782, however, the particularly brilliant star of his court was the Anglo-Saxon scholar Alcuin, whom Charles had met in Italy in the previous year. Scientific studies were now carried on in an exceedingly vigorous manner in the palace. The royal family, the whole court and its surroundings engaged upon them, but of them all Charles himself was the most diligent and successful of Alcuin’s students. In the royal school,Schola palatina, which was ambulatory like the royal residence itself, the sons and daughters of the king with the children of the most distinguished families of the land received a high-class education. The teaching staff was constantly recruited from England, Ireland and Italy. After such preparations Charles issued inA.D.787 a circular to all the bishops and abbots of his kingdom which enjoined under threat of his severe royal displeasure that schools should be erected in all monasteries and cathedral churches. Meanwhile his endeavours were most successful, but were rather one-sided in the preference given to classical and patristic literature, without a proper national foundation. Charles’s great and generous nature indeed had a warm interest in national culture, but those around him, with the single exception of Paul Warnefrid, had in consequence of their Latin monkish training lost all taste for German thought, language and nationality, and fearing lest such studies might endanger Christianity and cause a relapse into paganism, they did not help but rather hindered the king’s effort to promote a national literature.—Louis the Pious,A.D.814-840, had his weak government disturbed by the strifes of parties and of the citizens. This period, therefore, was not specially favourable to the development of scientific studies, but the seed sown by his father still bore noble fruit. His son Lothair issued an ordinance which gave a new organization to the educational system of Italy, indeed created it anew. But Italy restless and full of factions was the land where least of all such institutions could be successfully conducted.A new golden age, however, dawned for France underCharles the Bald,A.D.840-877. His court resembled that of his great grandfather in having gathered to it the élite of scholars from all the West. The royal school gained new renown under the direction ofJoannes Scotus Erigena. The cathedral and monastic schools of France vied with the most famous institutions of Germany (St. Gall, Fulda, Reichenau, etc.), and over the French episcopal sees men presided who had the most distinguished reputation for scholarship. But after Charles’s death the bloom of the Carolingian period passed away with almost inconceivable rapidity amid the commotions of the time into thick darkness, chaos and barbarism.
§ 90.2.The most distinguished Theologians of the Pre-Carolingian Age.
§ 90.3.The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charlemagne.
§ 90.4.The most distinguished Theologians of the Age of Louis the Pious.
§ 90.5.The Most Distinguished Theologians of the Age of Charles the Bald.
§ 90.6.
§ 90.7.
§ 90.8.The Monastic and Cathedral Schoolshad as their main task the training of capable servants for the church. The handbooks mainly in use were those of Cassiodorus, Isidore, Bede, Alcuin and Rabanus. Great diligence was shown, especially in the monasteries, in founding libraries and multiplying books by means of good copies. Alcuin made a threefold division of all sciences; ethics, physics and theology. Ethics corresponded to what was afterwards called the Trivium (Grammar, Rhetoric and Dialectic); Physics to the Quadrivium (Arithmetic, Geometry, Music and Astronomy). These two together comprehended the whole range of the sevenfreearts,i.e.worthy of the study of a free man, liberal studies. Latin was the language of intercourse and instruction. Greek, which was spread by Theodore of Tarsus, a Greek monk, who, after being long a teacher in Rome, was inA.D.669 made archbishop of Canterbury, and by his pupils was also taught in the more important schools. Acquaintance with Hebrew was much more rare, and was often obtained by means of intercourse with learned Jews. Boethius [Boëthius] was the vehicle of instruction in philosophy. In the 9th century the works ascribed to Dionysius the Areopagite (§47, 11) were sent to France as a present from the Byzantine emperor Michael to Louis of France. He was identified with the founder of the church of Paris of the same name, and patriotic feeling gave an immense impulse to the study of his writings. The abbot Hildmin of St. Denys, and subsequently Joannes Erigena, translated them into Latin.Encyclopædic works, giving compendiums of the whole range of the sciences then known, were produced by Isidore and Rabanus.256—Continuation, § 99, 3.
§ 90.9.Various Branches of Theological Science.—The labours of the German church in the department of scientific theology was directed to the church’s immediate needs, and hence the character of its theology was biblical and practical, and the reputation of the fathers so extravagantly high, that wherever it was possible, teaching, preaching, proving and refuting were all carried on in their very words. Charlemagne’s powerful efforts in the direction of reform gave even in the department of theology abundant occasion and encouragement to scholars round about him to a more independent procedure, and the theological controversies of the 9th century afforded sufficient scope to independent thinking.
§ 90.10.Anglo-Saxon Culture under Alfred the Great,A.D.871-901.—Alfred the Great, the greatest and noblest of all the kings that England has ever had, was the grandson of Egbert who had united inA.D.827 the seven Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. When five years old he received papal anointing at Rome and two years later in company with his pious father he travelled thence, made a considerable stay at the brilliant court of Charlemagne where he received the impress of its superior culture, and began his reign inA.D.871 in his 22nd year when the kingdom was sorely oppressed by Danish invasions. He applied all the energy of his mind to the difficult problems of government, to the emancipation and civilization of his country and people by driving out the Danish robbers, and then improving the internal condition of the land by attention to agriculture, industry and trade, by a wise organization, legislation and administration, by the founding of churches, monasteries and schools, and by furthering every scientific endeavour from a thoroughly national point of view. When already thirty-six years of age he learnt the Latin language and used this acquirement for the enriching of Anglo-Saxon literature by translations from his own hand, with many important additions of his own, of Boëthius’Consolatio philosophiæ, the Universal History of Orosius, Bede’s History of the Church of England and theRegula pastoralisof Gregory the Great. He also began a translation of the Psalms.He stimulated his learned friends to a like activity, among whom bishop Asser of Sherborne in hisVita Alfredi(Engl. transl. in “Six Old English Chronicles”) has reared a worthy memorial of his master.260—Continuation, § 100, 1.