(3) Direct legislation, including the initiative and referendum and the right of recall.
(4) Publicity of political campaign fund contributions and expenditures both before and after elections.
(5) The abolition of the patronage system.
(6) Full provincial autonomy in liquor legislation, including manufacture, export and import.
(7) That the extension of the franchise to women in any province shall automatically admit them to the federal franchise.
That is the official stand of the farmers and they point out that their political platform[1] is constructive, not destructive. The farmers are not trying to sidestep their fair share of the expenses in connection with government and public institutions; where they have torn down they have rebuilt.
Admitting that the prosperity of Western Canada is essential to our national prosperity, it is not necessary to look far in order to understand why the farmers have taken this definite action. Western farmers and citizens generally are carrying extra burdens which offset the advantages of cheap and fertile land. Interest on mortgages and bank loans have been higher than in Eastern Canada. It is more expensive to distribute commodities West than East. On account of the lavish donations of Western lands to railway promoters the cost of railway construction has borne heavily on the West. Freight rates are about sixty per cent. higher and express rates about sixty-six per cent. higher than in Eastern Canada. Thanks to the protective tariff, Western people are paying high for everything they get without any return compensation.
"Something has to be done to lift some of these unjust burdens," say the farmers, "if a prosperous country is to be developed West of the Great Lakes."
Hence this platform. The Western farmers believe in it earnestly. It is their politics. They believe that the results which would follow its support in the House of Commons would be of untold benefit to the Canadian people as a whole. They will continue to believe it.
When the crisis arose which brought about the last election, in which Union Government swept the West, the farmers saw the gravity of the situation and were prepared to forego immediate discussion of tariff amendments to concentrate on winning the war. Some of the farmers' candidates even withdrew in favor of Union candidates. All those who remained in the field were elected.
After the war is won—what? Reforms of breathtaking sweep are taking place as the natural outcome of current conditions. The liquor traffic has been tossed aside like a useless boot. Woman has stepped forth to a sphere of active worth without upheaval. Just where lie the boundaries of the impossible and who shall define them?
It is a far-seeing, clear-thinking New Farmer who has come forward in the last decade. Through his associations, his marketing experiences, his contact with railways and banks and manufacturers and governments he has become a student of economics. At the same time he has strengthened his thews and sinews for whatever may face him on the path ahead.
And his eyes are wide open to the fact that there are "lions in the path!"
Wait a minute, Mr. Business Man! Before condemning this Western farmer out of hand, put yourself in his place and try for a moment in all fairness to forget your own viewpoint. It may be that you have not even seen the prairies. Have you ever been at sea with not a thing in sight but water, sky, horizon? Imagine the water to be land, and yourself living in a one-room shack or a little low sod hut bewhiskered with growing grass. The nearest railway was fifty miles away and you got so lonesome that the howl of a coyote or the cry of owls in the night nearly drove you crazy. Neighbors so scarce your social pleasures were cut off by distance and you reared your family on that homestead twenty-five miles from a doctor, a church or a school.
When you made the long trip in for supplies in those early days you found you had to pay anywhere up to twice as much as their market value while for what you had to sell you had to take from twenty-five to fifty per cent. less than the market value. The implements you simply had to have for your work you bought on the instalment plan with interest at ten and twelve per cent. for the privilege.
When you had survived three years of this and with high hopes took your patent to the mortgage company to raise a loan at ten per cent. you found you couldn't get accommodation. Thereupon in marched your implement and other creditors with a chattel mortgage on everything you had—except the missus and the kids and the baby's bottley-by!
Then in the beautiful hot month of August it blew up black one day and the chickens scurried for shelter and you and the wife stood with your noses flattened against the window-pane—unless it was only oiled paper—and watched the big ice-marbles bouncing and heard the hail drumming flat in a few minutes the acres of wheat you had worked so hard to produce.
Or perhaps you escaped that time only to have your wheat frozen later on and when you took three days on purpose to haul in a wagonload to the elevator you couldn't get a decent offer for it. So that you pulled off your mitts and clenched your frost-cracked hands as you prepared to turn homeward with but a pitiful portion of the food and clothing you had promised the family you would bring. As you spread across your chest, inside your sheepskin coat, the old newspaper somebody had given you would your soul expand with the joy of living while you headed out into the snowy waste at forty degrees below zero?
And if after you got home and the crying young ones had been put to bed in the corner behind the canvas curtain and your wife came and sat beside you, her own tears bravely dried—if then you read in the paper that the Government had decided you farmers were so prosperous you should contribute from your easily gained wealth a free gift to manufacturers, financiers, railway magnates or others—then would you say with a great booming, hearty enthusiasm and shining eyes: "I tell you, Wife, this is the life!"—would you?
Or would you just proceed to swear—naturally, successfully, in what is known as "flowing" language?
By just such pioneer hardships were the farmers of Western Canada driven to organize in self-defence. It has ever been the history of revolt that its wellspring was the suffering of the people. Pioneer hardships it was that caused the various movements which agitated the farmers of the Western States in earlier days. When fingers become hardened and crooked from unceasing toil that achieves nothing but premature old age; when hope withers in a treadmill that grinds to the very soul—then comes rebellion.
[1] Since the formation of the organized farmers' National Political Platform several of its planks have been adopted as legislation at Ottawa, notably the abolition of the patronage system, extension of the franchise to women, total prohibition, and personal income taxation.
The principle of co-operation draws the whole community together. It breaks down barriers. It unites the State. It gives hope to the humblest toiler. And it strengthens the great moral ideal of duty, without which no State can endure.—Earl Grey.
What is to be the final outcome of the Western farmers' revolt and its spread to rural communities in Eastern provinces? Is there to be greater harmony among opposing interests or is Canada on the threshold of internal strife which will plow deep furrows of dissension between class and class to an extent hitherto unknown in this country? If there is to be a pitched fight between capitalistic groups and the people at large, led by the farmers, what are the chances of victory for the latter? If they win, what will be the national effect?
These were a few of the questions which first turned the writer's serious attention to the Grain Growers. It seems scarcely credible that this great economic movement has attained present momentum practically unheralded; yet such is the case. The writer had watched its early struggles to success from Government windows and as preparation for a brief historical sketch it seemed desirable to get out among the farmers themselves and study the situation from their angle.
Frankly, the task was not approached without some skepticism as to the motives which might be uncovered. Almost the only occasions on which the Grain Growers revealed themselves to the public were when they waited upon politicians for this, that or the other. So often did this happen and so insistent were they that there seemed some grounds for the belief that to satisfy a Grain Grower was humanly impossible. From Legislative casements it even looked at times as if they were a new species of Indian, collecting political scalps! All manner of people accused them of all manner of things. In the East they were called "blacksmith-shop politicians, nail-keg economists, grousers and soreheads"; in the West they were dubbed "corner-grocer statesmen and political football players."
When the caravans of the Eastern political chieftains, Liberal and Conservative, came West they knew they were going to be held up by the outlaws. Long before these respective expeditions started across the plains infested with wild and dangerous Grain Growers, their scouts—the Western M.P.'s—were ranging far and wide in preparation.
And when those Grain Growers in turn rode East to take possession of Ottawa there was a popular expectation that they were about to whoop in and shoot up the town in the real old wild and woolly way. They were referred to cleverly as "Sod-Busters." It was rather startling to find them merely a new type of Business Farmer, trained to think on his feet, a student of economics.
To gather and verify the facts here recorded has required two years. During that time the writer has listened to earnest farmers in prairie shacks, pioneers and newcomers, leaders and followers, and has watched these farmers at work in their "Farmers' Parliaments" where they assemble annually by the thousands. It is impossible thus to meet and know these men while examining the facts of their accomplishments without being impressed by the tremendous potentialities that underlie their efforts.
Almost the first discovery is that the organized farmers have ideals beyond material advantage and that these ideals are national in scope, therefore involving responsibilities. Undeterred by these, the farmers are eager to push on to further achievements. Their hope for these ideals lies in the success of their business undertakings and it is because that success is the spinal column of the whole movement that it occupies such a prominent place in this historical outline.
Not all the Grain Growers are men of vision, it must be admitted. Many have joined the movement for what they can get out of it. In all great aggregations of human beings it is quite possible to discover the full gamut of human failings. But loose threads sticking to a piece of cloth are no part of its warp and woof. It is the thinking Grain Grower who must be reckoned with and he is in the majority; the others are being educated.
If there is doubt as to the sincerity of the organized farmers, why did their pioneer business agency spend its substance in educational directions instead of solely along the straight commercial lines of the concerns with which it was in competition? The very mould into which it poured its energies shaped special difficulties, generated special antagonisms and every possible obstruction to its progress. Its cash grants to the Associations in the West, to the official organ of the movement, even to the Ontario farmers, run over the hundred-thousand-dollar mark.
Or, take the case of the Grain Growers at Virden, Manitoba, who proposed to bring into the district a large shipment of binder twine to supply their members. When the local merchant who had been handling this necessity learned of the plan he raised his voice, thus:
"If you fellows are going to do that then I go out of binder twine this season. I won't handle a pound of it."
"Not even to supply the farmers who don't belong to our Association?"
"That's what I said. You're going to make a convenience of me when you rob me of all my cash business. The only business I could do would be with farmers who wanted credit."
Did the Grain Growers say: "That's their lookout, then. Let them join us or go twineless"? No. They decided to bring in their co-operative shipment as planned, but to allow the merchant to handle it on commission in order to prevent any injustice to the other farmers.
Incidents like that can be recorded from all over the country. It does not take very many of them to compel the honest conviction that equity of citizenship for all the people in every walk of life means more to these farmers than a high-sounding shibboleth. That being so, it becomes difficult to accept the slur of utter selfishness—the idea that the farmers are auto-intoxicated, a pig-headed lot who cause trouble for nothing. It is very hard to believe that Everybody Else is good and kind and sincere and true, affectionate one to another with brotherly love, not slothful in business; for one knows that the best of us need the prayers of our mothers!
When these Grain Growers started out they did not know very much about what was going on. They had their suspicions; but that was all. To-day they know. Their business activities have taught them many things while providing the resources for the fight that is shaping unless the whole monopolistic system lets go its stranglehold.
Yes, the farmers do talk about freedom in buying and selling; also about tariff reform. They point out that there are criminal laws to jail bankers who dared to charge from twenty-five per cent. to forty-two per cent. for the use of money; that food and clothing and the necessaries of life are the same as money and that high tariff protection which fosters combines and monopolies is official discrimination against the many in favor of the few; that there are other and more just forms of taxation and that all old systems of patronage and campaign funds have got to go if the grave problems of these grave times are to be met successfully.
It is no old-time "Hayseed" who is discussing these things. It is a New Farmer altogether. The Farmers' Movement is no fancy of the moment either, but the product of Time itself. It is a condition which has developed in our rural life as the corolla of increased opportunities for education. The Farmer to-day is a different man to what he was ten years ago—indeed, five years ago.
It has taken fifteen years of bitter struggle for the Western farmers to win to their present position and now that they are far enough along their Trail to Better Things to command respect they are going to say what they think without fear or favor. They believe the principles for which they stand to be fundamental to national progress.
If there is to be any attempt to cram the old order of things down the people's throats; if, under cloak of all this present talk of winning the war, of new eras and of patriotism, profiteers should scheme and plan fresh campaigns—then will there be such a wrathful rising of the people as will sweep everything before it. In the forefront of that battle will stand the rugged legions of the organized farmers.
Make no miscalculation of their ability to fight. This year, 1918, will see them sawing their own lumber in their own saw-mills in British Columbia. If necessary, they can grind their own flour in their own flour mills, dig their own coal from their own mines, run their own packing-plants, provide their own fidelity and fire-insurance, finance their own undertakings. They grow the grain. They produce the new wealth from the soil. They are the men who create our greatest asset, everything else revolving upon the axis of Agriculture in Canada.
If, then, the farming population has learned to co-operate and stand solid; if in addition they have acquired the necessary capital to educate the masses and are prepared to spend it in advancing their ideals; if the working classes of the cities and the soldier citizens of Coming Days join their ranks—what chance will Special Privilege have against the public desire for Equal Rights?
Is it to be co-operation in all sincerity or class warfare? If the other great interests in our national life will meet the Farmer in a fair spirit, approaching our national problems in an honest attempt to co-operate in their solution for the common good, they will find the Farmer meeting them eagerly. They will find that these farmer leaders are reasonable men, broad-minded, square-principled and just—no less so because the class they represent is organized to stand up for its rights.
The situation is not hopeless. Most of these pages we have been turning are Back Pages. Old conditions and much of the bitterness which they generated have passed. The story of those old conditions has been told from the viewpoint of the Farmer in order that his attitude may be understood. But it must be remembered that the grain trade to-day is a very different proposition to what it was and that many of the men who have devoted their lives to it in the cities have played a big and honest part in its development. The Winnipeg Grain Exchange as an Exchange has done a great deal for Western Canada, a point that undoubtedly has been overlooked by many farmers. Gradually, however, the Farmer has learned that all is not evil in "Babylon"; for out of revolution has come evolution.[1]
The key to that better future which is desired so earnestly and wisely is Education. The problems of the day are commanding the mental focus of the nation. The Banks, the Railways, the Manufacturers are considering them. The Joint Committee of Commerce and Agriculture has great opportunities for removing much old-time hostility on both sides. And now that true co-operation of all classes has become a national duty, surely out of the testing must come better understanding and a greater future.
Just now, of course, there is only the War. It has brought the Canadian people to their feet. For the angry glare of the gun flashes has thrown in silhouette many fallacies, many foibles and rubbish heaps, and these must be swept out in preparation for the new nationhood which Canada is called upon to assume. With a third of the entire British Empire entrusted to her management and the hopeful gaze of homemakers the world over turning upon her Canada's responsibilities are great. But she will rise to her opportunities.
Just now there is only the War. The history of mankind has no previous record of such chaos, such a solemn time. Thrones toppling, maps changing, whole peoples dying of starvation and misery while the fate of Democracy is balanced on the issue. Men are slaying each other on land, in the air, on the water and below it while the forces of Destruction are gnawing holes in the World's resources with the rapacity of swarming rats. It is costing Great Britain alone over thirty-five million dollars every day—a million and a half every hour!
As for Canada—much figuring is being done by experts and others in attempts to estimate the total debt which the Canadian people will have to carry after the war. But the people themselves are too far immersed in war efforts to pause for futile reckonings. There will be time enough for that when the war is won, and won it shall be, no matter what the cost. It requires no great perspicacity to realize that our total national debt will be a sum which rolls so easily on its ciphers that it eludes the grasp of the average mind. It is going to cost a lot even to keep the wheels greased at five and one-half per cent. from year to year. Everybody knows it.Win the War!
When the lamp went out and the old world we had known blew up—away back in 1914—we spagged about anxiously, calling to each other: "Business as Usual!" Since then factory production has gone up fifty per cent.; export trade a hundred; profits on capital all the way up to the billion-and-a-quarter mark. We have got so used to things in four years that there is danger of forgetting that War has driven a sap beneath these ironical gifts of Mars and it is full time Business looked around for a place to light and got ready to dig itself in.
Mobilization, co-operation of every interest, the full grapple of every individual—national effort, in short—these the State demands. The coverlet has been thrown back upon the realization that the State has claims upon each citizen which transcend his individual fortunes—that individual prosperity, in fact, is entirely dependent upon the prosperity of the national whole.
Not all by himself can the Man Behind The Gun win a war like this. At his heels must stand the munition workers, the Man Back of The Desk, the people themselves, each guarding against waste and each contributing his or her part, great or small, for that national economy which alone can hope to sustain the terrific pace that victory demands. Finally, out in the great open spaces, faithful and unassuming and backing his country to the limit, must plod the Man Behind The Plow, working silently and steadily from dawn till dark to enlist and re-enlist the horizoned acres.
Canada has reason for pride in her farmers. No class is more loyal to British traditions. No class is more determined to win this war. Thousands of their sons are at the front. Many a lonely mother has stood on a prairie knoll, straining her eyes for the last glimpse of the buggy and bravely waving "God-speed." In many a windswept prairie farm home reigns the sad pride of sacrifice.
Out of the sanctifying fires is arising a national tendency to new viewpoints. The hope of Canada lies in a more active participation in affairs by the Average Citizen. In opposition to an awakened national interest what chance is there going to be for the silent partnerships of "invisible government"? 'Twill be a sorry partizan who allows his thoughts at this crisis to patter away at that old practice line, so full of past mistakes: "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the Party."
Win-the-War unity is the leaven at work in Canada to-day and regeneration is coming.
What does it matter except that our country's leaders shall rise to their opportunities for true statesmanship with a deep sense of their responsibilities to the millions who turn to them for guidance in this time of national stress? What does it matter except that the people shall grant to their leaders their sympathy and co-operation in the cares of crisis?
As this book goes to the publisher Union Government in Canada has become a fact. Not since Confederation has such a thing happened in this country. The vampire methods with which our political system has been cursed have been thrown under foot and thinking Canadians everywhere have drawn a breath of relief. The energies which have been wasted in jockeying for party position are now concentrating upon effective unity of action. Let us hope so indeed. There must be no want of confidence in the cheers which echo from Canadian trenches.
For over there where Canada's first line of defence runs from the North Sea through Belgium into France your boy, Mr. Business Man, and your boy, Mr. Farmer, stand shoulder to shoulder. Think you that in the crucible which bares the very souls of men those boys have any thought of class criticism or of selfish grabbings? In those trenches you will find more practical Christianity, more unselfishness, more true brotherhood than can be realized at this distance. The spirit of sacrifice, the help-one-another idea, the equal share and charity of thought—these revitalizing principles will be brought back by our khaki citizens when they march home from victory. It is past belief that there should be anything but complete unity of purpose as they look back for their country's supports.
A coat of arms on the red field of a British flag, a maple leaf on khaki cap or collar-band, a single name on every shoulder-strap—CANADA. All the nations of the earth salute that name. For it is emblazoned on the shell-churned fields of Ypres where, sweltering and bleeding, Canada "saved the day" for all humanity. It is inscribed for all time to come on the Somme—on Vimy Ridge—on the difficult slopes of Passchendaele.
Just now, only the War.
But when in the Years To Be we find ourselves in some far land or in some international circle which Chance, mayhap, has thrown together; when the talk turns upon the Great War and the wonderful victory of Civilization; when we are questioned as to who and what we are and we reply simply: "Gentlemen, I am a Canadian"——
Then may the light of pride in our eyes be undimmed by any sense of shame for duty shunned. May it be that out of it all has arisen a higher conception of individual and national life. So that in place of deep furrows of dissension there will be the level seed-bed of greater unity and justice among men.
[1] Abnormal conditions in the grain trade at present, due to the war, have led to government control of the crop by means of a Board of Grain Supervisors, aside altogether from the permanent Board of Grain Commissioners. This government commission has very wide powers, superseding the Grain Act for the time being, and can fix the price at which grain stored in any elevator may be purchased, ascertain available supplies, fix conditions of removal from storage and determine the destination of grain, receive purchase offers and fix sale prices, take possession of grain in elevators and sell it, provide transportation, etc.
The Board of Grain Supervisors consists of two representatives of theorganized farmers—Hon. T. A. Crerar, Minister of Agriculture, and H. W.Wood, President of United Farmers of Alberta; one representative ofunorganised farmers—S. K. Rathwell; three representatives of theWinnipeg Grain Exchange—J. C. Gage, W. E. Bawlf and Dr. Magill(Chairman); a representative of the British Food Commission—Jas.Stewart; two representatives of Labor—Controller Ainey (Montreal) and W.B. Best, of Locomotive Firemen; W. A. Matheson, of Lake of the WoodsMilling Company, and Lionel H. Clarke, head of the Canada Malting Companyand a member of the Toronto Harbor Commission. Dr. Robert Magill, theChairman, is Secretary of the Winnipeg Grain Exchange and was formerlyChief Commissioner of the permanent Board of Grain Commissioners.
1.Territorial(Saskatchewan)Grain Growers' Association—1902.
President, W. R. Motherwell (Abernethy); Secretary, John Millar (IndianHead). Among those who acted on the first Board of Directors were:Messrs. Walter Govan and M. M. Warden (Indian Head); John Gillespie,Elmer Shaw and Peter Dayman (Abernethy); Matthew Snow (Wolseley).
2.Virden(Manitoba)Grain Growers' Association—1903.
President, J. W. Scallion; Vice-president, George Carefoot;Secretary-Treasurer, H. W. Dayton; Directors: J. A. Blakeman, IsaacBennett, Peter McDonald and C. E. Ivens.
3.Manitoba Grain Growers' Association—1903.
President, J. W. Scallion (Virden); Vice-President, R. C. Henders(Culross); Secretary-Treasurer, R. McKenzie (Brandon); Directors:Donald McEwan, Brandon; William Ryan (Boissevain), W. A. Robinson(Elva), D. W. McCuaig (Portage la Prairie), John Wilson (Lenore), andH. A. Fraser, Hamiota.
4.Committee to Investigate Possibilities of Farmers Trading in Grain—1905.
The first step towards co-operative trading in grain by the farmers ofWestern Canada was a scheme, fathered by E. A. Partridge, of Sintaluta,Sask., the first official action being taken by the Manitoba GrainGrowers' Association at their annual convention in 1905, when thefollowing committee was ordered to investigate and report:
Chairman, E. A. Partridge (Sintaluta, Sask.); J. A. Taylor (Cartwright,Man.); A. S. Barton (Boissevain, Man.).
5.Local Committee to Organise Meeting of Sintaluta Farmers—1906.
The following committee of Sintaluta farmers made arrangements for a meeting of the farmers in the Sintaluta district to discuss co-operative trading in grain and to pledge support of the trading company proposed by E. A. Partridge:
E. A. Partridge, Al Quigley, Dave Railton, W. J. Bonner, T. McLeod,James Ewart.
6.Preliminary Organisation Committee of Sintaluta Farmers—1906.
E. A. Partridge (Chairman), A. J. Quigley (Secretary), William Hall(Treasurer), James Halford, James Ewart, D. Railton, Sr., J. O.Partridge, William J. Bonner, Thomas S. McLeod, W. Malhiot, H. O.Partridge, G. K. Grass, Harold Bird, H. T. Smith, George Hill—all ofSintaluta, Sask.
Subsequently this committee was enlarged to include a number ofManitoba canvassers.
7.Provisional Officers of Grain Growers' Grain Company—1906.
Provisional organization of the Western farmers' pioneer trading company finally took place at Winnipeg, July 26th, 1906, when the following officers were chosen:
President, E. A. Partridge; Vice-President, John Kennedy;Secretary-Treasurer, John Spencer; Directors: W. A. Robinson (Elva,Man.), and Francis Graham (Melita, Man.).
At a general meeting of the shareholders these same officers were elected subsequently and the directorate increased by two—Robert Cruise (Dauphin) and T. W. Knowles (Emerson).
8.Sintaluta(Sask.)Farmers Who Pledged Personal Securities—1906.
Finding themselves $1,500 short of the necessary $2,500 for the purchase of a seat on the Winnipeg Grain Exchange, the young trading company of farmers had recourse to personal securities in order to finance their start in business. The friends to whom E. A. Partridge appealed and who immediately gave the bank their personal notes were the following Sintaluta men:
Dave Railton, Al Quigley, Tom McLeod, Jim Ewart, William E. Hall.
9.Inter-Provincial Council of Grain Growers' and Farmers' Associations—1907.
It was under this name that the executive officers of the various farmers' organizations in the three Prairie Provinces first came together to discuss problems affecting the Movement as a whole. The first officers of the Inter-Provincial Council were:
President, E. N. Hopkins (Moose Jaw, Sask.); Secretary, M. D. Geddes(Calgary, Alberta).
10.United Farmers of Alberta—1909.
Until January 14th, 1909, the farmers of Alberta had two provincial organizations—the "Canadian Society of Equity" and the "Alberta Farmers' Association." On this date amalgamation took place at Edmonton under the name, "United Farmers of Alberta" with officers and directors as follows:
President, James Bower (Red Deer); Vice-President, Rice Sheppard(Strathcona); Secretary, Edward J. Fream (Calgary); Directors: G. A.Dixon (Fishburn), A. Von Mielecki (Calgary), George McDonald (Olds),George Long (Edmonton), Thomas Balaam (Vegreville), L. H. Jelliffe(Spring Coulee), E. Carswell (Penhold), H. Jamieson (Red Deer).
11.Canadian Council of Agriculture—1910.
The name of the Inter-Provincial Council (Par. 9) was changed to the"Canadian Council of Agriculture" in 1909 when relations wereestablished with The Grange, the early organization of Ontario farmers.The first officers of the new inter-provincial body were:
President, D. W. McCuaig (Portage la Prairie, Man.); Vice-president,James Bower (Red Deer, Alberta); Secretary, E. C. Drury (Barrie, Ont.).
12.Saskatchewan Co-Operative Elevator Company—1911.
Provisional Officers: President, J. A. Maharg (Moose Jaw);Vice-president, F. W. Green (Moose Jaw); Secretary-Treasurer, CharlesA. Dunning (Beaverdale); Directors: A. G. Hawkes (Percival), JamesRobinson (Walpole), Dr. T. Hill (Kinley).
Upon early withdrawal of F. W. Green for personal reasons, GeorgeLangley (Maymont) was called by the Board in an advisory capacity.
First Election: President, J. A. Maharg (Moose Jaw); Vice-President,George Langley (Maymont); Secretary-Treasurer, Charles A. Dunning(Beaverdale); Directors: James Robinson (Walpole), W. C. Sutherland(Saskatoon), N. E. Baumunk (Dundurn), A. G. Hawkes (Percival), J. E.Paynter (Tantallon), Dr. E. J. Barrick.
13.Alberta Farmers' Co-Operative Elevator Company—1913.
Provisional Officers: President, W. J. Tregillus (Calgary);Vice-President, E. Carswell (Red Deer); Secretary-Treasurer, E. J.Fream (Calgary); Directors: Joseph Quinsey (Noble), William S. Henry(Bow Island), Rice Sheppard (Edmonton), P. P. Woodbridge (Calgary).
First Election: President, W. J. Tregillus; Vice-president, J.Quinsey (Noble); Secretary-Treasurer, E. J. Fream (Calgary); Directors:E. Carswell (Red Deer), Rice Sheppard (Edmonton), P. S. Austin(Ranfurly), J. G. McKay (Provost), R. A. Parker (Winnifred), C.Rice-Jones (Veteran).
14.United Farmers of Ontario—1914.
Organisation Committee—1913: E. C. Drury (Barrie), J. J. Morrison (Arthur), Henry Glendinning (Manilla), Elmer Lick (Oshawa), H. B. Cowan (Peterboro), W. C. Good (Paris), Col. J. Z. Frazer (Burford).
First Election of Officers—1914: President, E. C. Drury (Barrie); Secretary-Treasurer, J. J. Morrison (Arthur).
15.United Farmers' Co-Operative Company, Limited—1914.
President, W. C. Good (Paris); Secretary-Treasurer, J. J. Morrison(Arthur); Executive: Anson Groh (Preston), C. W. Gurney (Paris), Col.J. Z. Fraser (Burford), E. C. Drury (Barrie).
16.United Farmers of British Columbia—1917.
Provisional Committee(Vancouver Island Farmers' Union)—1916:Chairman, R. M. Palmer (Cowichan Bay); Secretary-Treasurer, W. Paterson(Duncan); H. G. Helgesen (Metchosin), G. A. Cheeke (Shawnigan Lake), A.E. Brooke Wilkinson (Cobble Hill), E. H. Forrest (Hillbank), F. J.Bishop (Cowichan Station), G. H. Hadwen (Comiaken), C. G. Palmer,C.I.E. (Quamichan), F. Maris Hale (Deerholme), A. A. Mutter (Somenos),L. F. Solly (Westholme), R. U. Hurford (Courtenay), A. C. Aiken(Duncan).
First Election(United Farmers of British Columbia)—1917:President, C. G. Palmer (Quamichan); Vice-Presidents: J. W. Berry(Langley), R. A. Copeland (Kelowna), P. H. Moore (Saanich); Secretary,H. J. Ruscombe Poole (Duncan); Directors: J. Johnson (Nelson), R. U.Hurford (Comox), L. Dilworth (Kelowna), R. H. Helmer (Summerland), W.E. Smith (Revelstoke), W. Paterson (Koksiloh).
17.United Grain Growers, Limited—1917.
By Act of Dominion Parliament, June, 1917, the necessary changes in the charter of the Grain Growers' Grain Company, Limited, were granted to enable amalgamation with the Alberta Farmers' Co-Operative Elevator Company under the name, "United Grain Growers, Limited"; authorized capital, $5,000,000. The first election of officers was as follows:
President, T. A. Crerar; 1st Vice-president, C. Rice-Jones (Veteran,Alta.); 2nd Vice-president, John Kennedy; Secretary, E. J. Fream(Calgary, Alta.); Directors: C. F. Brown (Calgary), R. A. Parker(Winnifred, Alta.), J. J. McLellan (Purple Springs, Alta.), P. S.Austin (Banfurly, Alta.), H. C. Wingate (Cayley, Alta.), RoderickMcKenzie (Brandon, Man.), F. J. Collyer (Welwyn, Sask.), John Morrison(Yellow Grass, Sask.), J. F. Reid (Orcadia, Sask.).
18. At the meeting of the Canadian Council of Agriculture in Winnipeg on July 5th, 1918, Norman P. Lambert was appointed Secretary-Treasurer to succeed Roderick McKenzie, who now occupies the position of Vice-president.
19. R. A. Bonnar, K.C. (Bonnar, Trueman, Hollands & Robinson), has been solicitor and counsel for the Grain Growers since 1906 and has been identified closely with them on many dramatic occasions.