The rotting of bulbs, roots, etc., has been much discussed during the last few years in the pages of theGardeners' Chronicle,Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkh., and elsewhere. The principal references to Bacteriosis—the rot in which bacteria are stated to be the primary agent causing these and similar diseases—may be found in Massee,Diseases of Plants, pp. 338-342, and more fully in Russell,Bacteria in their Relation to Vegetable Tissue, Baltimore, 1892; and in Migula,Kritische Uebersicht derjenigen Pflanzen-krankheiten, welche Angeblich durch Bakterien verursacht werden, Semarang, 1892.The most convincing accounts, however, are since that date; see Smith, "Pseudomonas Campestris,"Cent. f. Bakt., B. III., 1897, p. 284, and Arthur and Bolley,Bacteriosis of Carnations, Perdue University Agr. Expt. Station, 1896, Vol. VII., p. 17. Woods has lately shown that this disease is due to Aphides only, the bacteria having nothing to do with the disease primarily,Stigmonose,Bull. 19, U.S. Dept.Agr., 1900; but it is necessary to bear in mind that actual penetration of the cell-walls from without must be proved, as De Bary proved it for germ-tubes of fungi, before the evidence that Bacteria are truly parasitic in living plants can be called decisive. This is a difficult matter, but until it is settled we do not know whether these organisms are really parasitic in the sense thatPhytophthorais, or merely gain access by other means—I have traced them through dead fungus-hyphae—to the vessels, dead cell-walls, etc. The proof of infectionviawater pores and vessels is given for one species by Harding, "Die Schwarze Faulnis der Kohls," etc.,Cent. f. Bakt., Abh. II., B. VI., 1900, p. 305, with literature.Concerning the "Damping off" of seedlings, see Marshall Ward, "Observations on the Genus Pythium,"Quart. Journ. Microsc. Soc., Vol. XXIII., 1883, p. 485, and Atkinson,Bull. 94 of Cornell University Agric. Expt. Station, 1895, p. 233.On Bacteriosis in Turnips, see Potter,Proc. R. S.1901, Vol. LXVII., p. 442.
The rotting of bulbs, roots, etc., has been much discussed during the last few years in the pages of theGardeners' Chronicle,Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkh., and elsewhere. The principal references to Bacteriosis—the rot in which bacteria are stated to be the primary agent causing these and similar diseases—may be found in Massee,Diseases of Plants, pp. 338-342, and more fully in Russell,Bacteria in their Relation to Vegetable Tissue, Baltimore, 1892; and in Migula,Kritische Uebersicht derjenigen Pflanzen-krankheiten, welche Angeblich durch Bakterien verursacht werden, Semarang, 1892.
The most convincing accounts, however, are since that date; see Smith, "Pseudomonas Campestris,"Cent. f. Bakt., B. III., 1897, p. 284, and Arthur and Bolley,Bacteriosis of Carnations, Perdue University Agr. Expt. Station, 1896, Vol. VII., p. 17. Woods has lately shown that this disease is due to Aphides only, the bacteria having nothing to do with the disease primarily,Stigmonose,Bull. 19, U.S. Dept.Agr., 1900; but it is necessary to bear in mind that actual penetration of the cell-walls from without must be proved, as De Bary proved it for germ-tubes of fungi, before the evidence that Bacteria are truly parasitic in living plants can be called decisive. This is a difficult matter, but until it is settled we do not know whether these organisms are really parasitic in the sense thatPhytophthorais, or merely gain access by other means—I have traced them through dead fungus-hyphae—to the vessels, dead cell-walls, etc. The proof of infectionviawater pores and vessels is given for one species by Harding, "Die Schwarze Faulnis der Kohls," etc.,Cent. f. Bakt., Abh. II., B. VI., 1900, p. 305, with literature.
Concerning the "Damping off" of seedlings, see Marshall Ward, "Observations on the Genus Pythium,"Quart. Journ. Microsc. Soc., Vol. XXIII., 1883, p. 485, and Atkinson,Bull. 94 of Cornell University Agric. Expt. Station, 1895, p. 233.
On Bacteriosis in Turnips, see Potter,Proc. R. S.1901, Vol. LXVII., p. 442.
Patches—Frost-patches—Bruising due to hail, shot, etc.—Fire—Sun-burn or scorching—Sun-cracks. Dying-back—Frost—Fungi—Wound fungi—Defoliation by insects—Defoliation by hand—Staghead.
Patches—Frost-patches—Bruising due to hail, shot, etc.—Fire—Sun-burn or scorching—Sun-cracks. Dying-back—Frost—Fungi—Wound fungi—Defoliation by insects—Defoliation by hand—Staghead.
Necrosis.—This is a general term for cases where the tissues gradually turn brown or black in patches which die and dry up, the dead area sometimes spreading slowly and invading the usually sharply demarcated healthy tissues around. It is a common phenomenon on the more slender stems or branches of trees, especially those with a thin cortex, and the termsBrandorScorchingsometimes applied signify the recognised resemblance between burnt patches and these dead areas of necrotic tissue.
Necrosis is often due to frost, which kills the cortex of Pears, Beech, etc., in patches of this kind. The dead cortex and cambium stick to the wood beneath and contract as they dry. The livingcambium and cortex around them then begin to push in callus towards the centre of the necrotic area; but since this callus is formed under the pressure of the cortical tissues it does not form a thick lip or margin to the healing wound, as it does in a Canker, but insinuates itself with thinned-off edges between the wood and the dead tissue, or at most traps a little of the latter in the final closing up of the wound. It is easy to see how such an area of Necrosis may become a Canker if the dead tissues split or slough off, and fungi or insects obtain access to the callus at the margins of the area, setting up the disturbances described onp. 222. As matter of fact many Cankers—e.g.those of the Larch disease, and those due toNectria, or Aphides, etc.—often begin as flattened or depressed areas of Necrosis started by frost, and many small necrotic patches would eventually become Cankers if not healed up by the callus.
Necrosis may also be due to the bruising of the tissues by large hailstones, to gun-shot wounds, or to any form of contusion which kills the living cells of cortex and cambium.
Necrosis is a natural and common result of fire, and it frequently happens after forest-fires which have run rapidly through the dry underwood, fanned by steady winds, that the lower parts of the boles are scorched on one side only. The killed cambium and cortex then dry up in black necrotic patches, which may eventually heal up by intrusion of callus from the uninjured parts.
Sun-burnorScorching.—If thin-barked trees,such as Hornbeam, Beech, Firs, etc., which have been growing in partial shade owing to dense planting, are suddenly isolated by thinning, the impingement of the sun's rays on the south-west side during the hottest part of summer days may kill the cambium, and produce necrosis of the cortical tissues, and such necrotic patches heal very slowly or not at all, because the dead tissues have contracted so tightly on to the wood below that the callus cannot readily creep between.
Sun-cracksare due to intense insolation on the south side of trees in clear weather in early spring, causing the drying and contraction of the wood and its coverings down that side of the tree: the contracted tissues consequently split, as in the case of frost-cracks, the healing up of which is very similar.
Dying-back.—All that is true of the necrosis of cortical tissues in small patches also applies to cases where the whole of the outer tissues of thin twigs and branches die of inanition owing to a premature fall of leaves—e.g.after a severe attack of some insect or fungus pest. The consequent arrest of the transpiration current and the proper supply of nutriment to the cambium and cortex explain the phenomena. The younger branches of Coffee trees suffering from severe attacks of leaf-disease are often denuded of leaves and die back from the causes mentioned, the whole of the outer tissues becoming necrotic, and drying up tight on to the wood, because other branches with functionally active leaves on them divert thetranspiration current, and drought and inanition supervene.
Dying-back is frequently also a direct effect of early frosts, which kill the thin twigs before the "wood is ripened," as gardeners say.
Dying-back is also a frequent result of direct frost action on thin watery shoots or "unripe wood," and is apt to occur every year in certain varieties of Roses, for instance, in particular situations, such as "frost-beds," or aspects exposed to cutting winds, and so forth. The necrosis which results may affect all the tissues, or only the cortex and cambium, and the frequent accompaniment of all kinds of saprophyticAscomycetesand moulds or other fungi is in no way causal to the phenomenon.
Dying-back may also be caused by fungi, and not necessarily parasites, for cases are often observed where saprophytes only are to be found in the necrotic tissues of the cortex, having made their way in through minute cracks, lenticels, etc.
A simple case is often seen in Chrysanthemums, Roses, etc., chilled and wetted to danger point, but not frozen, during the nights of autumn. The lowered resistance of the chilled tissues enables fungi likeBotrytis cinereato gain a hold, and the peduncles die-back with all the symptoms of Necrosis, the fungus gaining power more and more as its mycelium spreads in the dead tissues.
Many other cases are known where wound-fungi, such asNectria,Cucurbitaria,Phoma, etc., in themselves incapable of true parasitism, gain a holdon the necrotic tissue of a wounded twig, and having laboriously accumulated a vigorous mycelium saprophytically, extend into other parts. In many of these cases the dying-back of the twigs is expedited owing to the mycelium invading the medullary rays and wood vessels, and so obstructing the transpiration current. The much more rapid spread of the hyphae up into the parts thus killed sufficiently indicates the fundamentally saprophytic character of such fungi.
Dying-back in all its forms is a common result of defoliation by insects,e.g.caterpillars, especially if it occurs when the wood is depleted of reserve materials, and thus cannot supply the auxiliary buds and enable the twigs to clothe themselves with a new flush of foliage, a common danger in Conifers.
Any form of defoliation—e.g.excessive plucking of tea and mulberry leaves, browsing of animals, etc.—exposes the twigs to the dangers of dying-back, the accessory phenomena being similar to those already described.
Stag-head.—Old trees, though vigorous and in full foliage throughout the crown generally, frequently lose the power of bearing leaves on their topmost branches and twigs, which stand out bare and brown, and fancifully resemble the antlers of a stag: hence the forester's name "stag-head." This "top-dry" condition is frequently due to the removal of litter, or to excessive draining, or to the roots having gradually penetrated into unsuitable soil. The consequence is that some dry summerthe drought causes the breakage of the water columns above, and the twigs die back.
Tropical trees may also becomestag-headedowing to the attacks ofLoranthusand other parasites, the portions above the point of attachment dying back from inanition.
Cases also occur in the tropics where thestag-headcondition is due to the persistent roosting of frugiferous bats—"flying foxes"—which tear the bark and foliage with their claws, and befoul the twigs generally.
The principal literature as regards frost is given in the works of Frank, Sorauer, and Hartig already referred to. An excellent summary will be found in Hartig'sDiseases of Trees, p. 282, and in Fisher "Forest Protection," Vol. IV. or Schlich'sManual, p. 423.
The principal literature as regards frost is given in the works of Frank, Sorauer, and Hartig already referred to. An excellent summary will be found in Hartig'sDiseases of Trees, p. 282, and in Fisher "Forest Protection," Vol. IV. or Schlich'sManual, p. 423.
Monstrosities—Teratology—Atrophy of organs—Shanking of grapes—Barren fruit trees—Dwarfing—Distortions and malformations—Fasciations—Flattened roots—Torsions—Curling and puckering—Leaf rolling—So-called "spontaneous" teratological changes.
Monstrosities—Teratology—Atrophy of organs—Shanking of grapes—Barren fruit trees—Dwarfing—Distortions and malformations—Fasciations—Flattened roots—Torsions—Curling and puckering—Leaf rolling—So-called "spontaneous" teratological changes.
Monstrosities.—In a wide sense this term is applicable to many cases here treated under other headings, and signifies any departure from the normal standard of size, form, arrangement, or number of parts, and so forth, due to arrest of growth, excessive growth of parts, or of the whole organs, etc.
Suchteratologicalconditions are however by no means alwayspathological: that is to say, they may be variations which do not threaten the existence of the plant. In some cases they are clearly due to exuberant nutrition, and although they may occasionally predispose to disease, inothers they show no evidence of doing so. The whole practice of horticulture and agriculture abounds in examples of teratological sports or varieties which are transmissible by seeds, budding and grafting, and other means—e.g.double flowers, hypertrophied floral organs (cauliflowers), seedless grapes and oranges, crested ferns, etc.; and even when such varieties could not live as such in a state of nature, there is evidence to show that many of them readily revert to the original seed-bearing or single condition, and adapt themselves to the altered environment.
Every part of the plant may exhibit teratological changes, and I shall for the most part select cases in illustration which indicate approach to pathological states, and group with them cases known to be pathological in origin.
Atrophyis a common phenomenon denoting dwindling or reductions in size of organs due to insufficient nutrition, or arrest of growth from various causes.
Atrophy of leaves is a common result of the attacks of parasitic fungi, even when the latter induce local hypertrophy—i.e.excessive growth of particular parts,e.g.Synchytriumon Dandelions and Anemones.Puccinia suaveolenscauses partial atrophy of the leaves of Thistles,Aecidium Euphorbiaeof those ofEuphorbia.
The carpels of Anemone are atrophied in plants attacked byAecidium, and the whole flower is suppressed in Cherries infested withExoascus Cerasi, while other fungi—e.g.Cystopus,Exoasci,etc.—cause atrophy of the seeds, and numerous instances of atrophied grain occur in plants infested with Ustilagineae.
Atrophy of the grains of cereals is sometimes due to the direct attack of animals,e.g.eel-worms (Tylenchus) eat out the grains of Corn; weevils and other beetles (Curculio,Bruchus, etc.) similarly devour the contents of grain and nuts, the flowers of Peas and Apples, and so forth, inducing atrophy of the parts left. Still more striking cases are afforded by small insects which bore into the halms of cereals, and cause atrophy of the whole ear—e.g.Cephusin Wheat and Rye. Barley occasionally withers after flowering, the grain atrophying from no known cause, terms likeconsumptiongiven to the disease conveying no information.
Atrophy of young fruits is commonly due to the flowers not setting—i.e.some agent has interfered with the normal transference of the pollen to the stigma. This may be due to excessive rain washing out the pollen (e.g.Vine), to a lack of the necessary insects which effect pollination, often seen in greenhouse plants; to the stamens being barren—e.g.certain varieties of Vine—or to the premature destruction of the stigmas by frost, as in Cherries, Pears, etc., or by insects, as in Apples, or fungi,e.g.the infection of bilberries withSclerotinia; or even by poisonous gases, as is sometimes seen in Wheat, etc., growing near alkali works. Drought is also a common cause of atrophy of young Plums.
Shanking of Grapesis a particular case of atrophy and drooping of the immature fruits, due to the supplies being cut off by some agency. It may arise from very various causes which bring about disease in the leaves or roots, and should always be looked upon as a sign of weakness in the Vine, the structure of which is affected,e.g.poor wood—or the functions interfered with,e.g.water supplies deficient owing to paucity of roots.
Barren Apple, Pear, Plum, and other flowers are often found to have been bored through the petals while in bud, and the whole "heart" of the flower eaten out by the grubs ofAnthonomus, leaving the unopened buds brown and dead, as if killed by frost or drought, and often erroneously supposed to be so.
The wilting and shrivelling of Clover is sometimes due toSclerotinia, the mycelium of which pervades the roots and stock, on which the sclerotia may be found. Lucerne is similarly killed in Europe by the barren mycelium ofLeptosphaeria, which may be found as a purple mat on the roots.
Dwarfingconsists in partial atrophy of all the organs, and is a common result of starvation in poor, dry, shallow soils, as may often be seen in the case of weeds on walls or in stony places. Dwarfs which are thus developed in consequence of perennial drought are not, however, necessarily diseased, in the more specific sense of the word; their organs are reduced in size proportionallythroughout in adaptation to the conditions, and simply carry out their functions on a smaller scale.
Dwarfing is frequently a consequence of the lack of food materials, or of some particular ingredient in the soil, and in such cases is a diseased condition of some danger; similar results may ensue in soils containing the necessary chemical elements, but in unavailable forms.
Dwarfing may also be brought about by repeated maiming, nipping off the buds, pruning, etc., as in the miniature trees of the Japanese; and the case of trees continually browsed down by cattle, or of moor plants perennially dwarfed by cutting winds, are further illustrations in the same category, as are also those of certain alpine and moraine plants, whose only chance of survival depends on their adapting themselves to the repeated prunings suffered by every young shoot which rises into the cutting winds, since there is no question of lack of food-materials in these cases.
The practice of the Japanese is to pinch out the growing tips of the shoots wherever they wish to prune back, and it is by the judicious use of this heading in, and suitable pot-culture, that the dwarfs are made, 6-20 inches high at from 30-80 years old.
Dwarfing is often brought about by grafting on a slow-growing stock, and this method is employed in practice, as are also heading in, pruning of roots, and confinement in pots.
Dwarfing may also be due to poor or shrivelled—partially atrophied—seeds or such as have had their endosperms or embryos injured by insects or fungi, and although it is possible to nurse such dwarfs into normal and vigorous plants with good culture, they do not usually recover under natural conditions in competition with more vigorous plants.
DistortionsorMalformationsmay be defined as abnormalities in the form of organs which concern all, or nearly all the parts, and do not refer merely to swellings or excrescences on them or excavations, etc., in them.
Fasciation.—Shoots of Asparagus, Pine, Ash, and many other plants are occasionally expanded into broad ribbon-like structures often studded with more than the normal number of buds or leaves, etc., such as would be found on the usual cylindrical shoots. Suchfasciationsare due to several buds fusing laterally under compression when young and the whole mass growing up in common, or, in a few cases, to the unilateral overgrowth of one side of the terminal bud. Fasciations appear to depend on excessive nutrition in rich soils. They may spread out above in a fan-like manner, exaggerating the abnormality, or they may revert to the original form. Some cases are more or less fixed by heredity—e.g.Celosia. Fasciated stems are frequently curved like a crozier, owing to one edge growing more rapidly than the other.
Cauliflowers are really cultivated monstrosities.Fasciated Dandelions,Crepis, monstrous Chrysanthemums, peloricLinaria, five-leaved Clovers, spiral Teazels, etc., may all, if grown with care, be kept more or less constant in the monstrous state. That is to say, the particular kinds of variation here manifested can be maintained in proportion as the external conditions controlling the variation are maintained. Such conditions are chiefly rich supplies of food-stuffs, plenty of water and air, suitable temperature and lighting, etc. Mutilations, favouring the development of abnormal buds may also induce fasciations.
Torsionsor spiral twistings of stems also frequently arise among plants grown in rich soils, and are often combined with fasciations—e.g.Asparagus,Dipsacus; and De Vries has shown that the peculiarity is not only transmissible by seed, but may be more or less fixed by appropriate culture.
Contortionsof stems are often due to the unequal growth on different sides of the stems owing to the presence of fungi—e.g.Caeomaon Pines,Aecidiumon Nettles, alsoPucciniaon petioles of Mallow,Cystopuson inflorescences ofCapsella, etc.
Distortionsof roots may be brought about in various ways by the hindrances afforded by stones.
Spiral rootsoccur occasionally in pot plants.
Flattened rootsusually result from compression between rocks, the young root having penetrated into a crevice, and been compelled to adapt itself later. The distortions of stems by constrictingclimbers, wire, etc., have been described, and fruits—e.g.Gourds—are easily distorted by means of string tied round them when young.
Distortions of leaves are very common, and are sometimes teratological—i.e.due to no known cause—e.g.the pitcher-like or hood-likecucullateleaves of the Lime, Cabbage,Pelargonium, etc., and of fused pairs inCrassula. Also coherent, bifurcate, crested, displaced and twisted leaves occasionally met with, and in some cases fixed by cultivation, may be placed in this category.
Puckersmust be distinguished from pustules, since they consist in local upraisings of the whole tissue, not swellings—e.g.the yellowish green pockets on Walnut leaves, due toPhyllereum.
Puckered leaves in which the area of mesophyll between the venation is increased by rising up in an arched or dome-like manner are sometimes brought about by excessive moisture in a confined space.
Leaf-curlis a similar deformation caused by fungi, such asExoascuson Peaches.
Wrinkling or puckering of leaves is also a common symptom of the work of Aphides—e.g.Hops.
Characteristic curling and puckering, with yellow and orange tints, of the terminal leaves of Apples, Pears, etc., are due to insects of the generaAphis,Psylla, etc.
Small red and yellow spots with puckerings and curlings of the young leaves of Pears, the spots turning darker later on, are due toPhytoptus.
Leaf-rolling.—The leaves of Beeches, Poplars, Limes, and many other plants, instead of opening out flat, are often rolled in from the margins, or from the apex, by various species ofPhytoptus,Cecidomyia, or other insects, which puncture or irritate the epidermis in the young stages and so arrest its expansion in proportion to the other tissues. According as the lower or upper surface is attacked the rolling is from the morphologically upper surface downwards, orvice versa. Very often the mesophyll is somewhat thickened where rolled andErineum-like hairs may be developed—e.g.Lime. Many caterpillars also roll leaves, drawing the margins inward to form shelters—e.g.Tortrix viridana, the Oak leaf-roller. Certain beetles—Rhynchitis—also roll up several leaves to form a shelter in which the eggs are laid.
Webs are formed among the mutilated leaves of Apples by the caterpillars ofHyponomeuta.
It must be borne in mind that instances can be found of teratological change of every organ in the plant—e.g.stamens transformed into carpels or into petals; anthers partly polliniferous and partly ovuliferous; ovules producing pollen in their interior, and so on, being simply a few startling examples of what may happen. Such abnormalities are frequently regarded as evidence of internal causes of disease, and this may be true in given cases; in a number of cases investigated, however, it has been shown that external agents of very definite nature bring about just such deformations as those sometimes cited as examples of teratologydue to internal causes, and the question is at least an open one whether many other cases will not also fall into this category. The study of galls has shown that insects can induce the formation of not only very extraordinary outgrowths of tissues and organs already in existence, but even of new formations and of tissue elements not found elsewhere in the plant or even in its allies; and Solms' investigations onUstilago Treubiishow that fungi can do the same, and even compel new tissues, which the stimulating effects of the hyphae have driven the plant to develop, to take part in raising and distributing the spores of the fungus—i.e.to assume functions for the benefit of the parasite. Molliard has given instances of mites whose irritating presence in flowers causes them to undergo teratological deformations, and Peyritsch has shown that the presence of mites in flowers induces transformations of petals into sepals, stamens into petals. Similarly De Bary, Molliard, Magnus, Mangin, and Giard have given numerous cases of the transformation of floral organs one into another under the irritating action of fungi, of which the transformation of normally unisexual (female) flowers into hermaphrodite ones, by the production of stamens not otherwise found there, are among the most remarkable.
These and similar examples suffice to awaken doubts as to whether any teratological change really arises "spontaneously," especially when we learn how slight a mechanical irritation of the growing point may induce changes in the flower;e.g.Sachsshowed that a sunflower head is profoundly altered by pricking the centre of the torus, and Molliard got double flowers by mechanical irritation.
For the details and classification of the multitude of facts, the student is referred to Masters'Vegetable Teratology, Ray Society, 1869, and the pages of theGardeners' Chroniclesince that date.Concerning torsions, etc., the student should read De Vries, "On Biastrepsis in its Relation to Cultivation,"Ann. of Bot., Vol. XIII., 1899, p. 395, and "Hybridising of Monstrosities,"Hybrid Conference Report,Roy. Hort. Soc., 1900, Vol. XXIV., p. 69.The reader will find an excellent account of the abnormalities in flowers due to the action of parasitic insects and fungi in Molliard, "Cécidies Florales,"Ann. des Sc. Nat., Ser. VIII., Bot., T. 1, 1895, p. 67.
For the details and classification of the multitude of facts, the student is referred to Masters'Vegetable Teratology, Ray Society, 1869, and the pages of theGardeners' Chroniclesince that date.
Concerning torsions, etc., the student should read De Vries, "On Biastrepsis in its Relation to Cultivation,"Ann. of Bot., Vol. XIII., 1899, p. 395, and "Hybridising of Monstrosities,"Hybrid Conference Report,Roy. Hort. Soc., 1900, Vol. XXIV., p. 69.
The reader will find an excellent account of the abnormalities in flowers due to the action of parasitic insects and fungi in Molliard, "Cécidies Florales,"Ann. des Sc. Nat., Ser. VIII., Bot., T. 1, 1895, p. 67.
Proliferations—Vivipary—Prolepsis—Lammas shoots—Dormant buds—Epicormic shoots—Adventitious buds—Apospory and apogamy.
Proliferations—Vivipary—Prolepsis—Lammas shoots—Dormant buds—Epicormic shoots—Adventitious buds—Apospory and apogamy.
Proliferationconsists in the unexpected and abnormal on-growing or budding out of parts—stems, tubers, flowers, fruits, etc.—which in the ordinary course of events would have ceased to grow further or to bear buds or leaf-tufts directly. Thus we do not expect a Strawberry—the swollen floral axis—to bear a tuft of leaves terminally above the achenes, but it occasionally does so, and similarly Pears may be found with a terminal tuft of leaves, Roses with the centre growing out as a shoot, Plantains (Plantago) with panicles in place of simple spikes, and so on.
We regard such cases asteratological, because they are exceptional for the particular species, and aspathologicalbecause they appear to be connected with over-feeding in soils with excessivesupplies of available food-materials; but it should be noted that conditions quite comparable to proliferation are normal in the inflorescences of Pine-apples, some Myrtaceae, Conifers, etc., and that many instances of proliferations come under the head of injurious actions of fungi, insects, and other agents.
Proliferationof tubers is sometimes seen in Potatoes still attached to the parent plant in wet weather following a drought. The eyes grow out into thin stolons, or forthwith into new tubers sessile on the old tuber. Similarly in store we sometimes find the eyes transformed directly into new tubers, and cases occur where the growth of the eye is directed backwards into the softening tuber, and a small potato is formed inside the parent one.
Threading is also occasionally met with in the "sets" when ripened too rapidly in hot dry soils.
Viviparyis a particular case of proliferation, in a certain sense, where the seeds appear to germinatein situ, and we have small plants springing from the flowers, reminding us of wheat which has sprouted in the shocks in damp weather. In reality, however, the grains are here replaced by bulbils which sprout before they separate from the inflorescence. In varieties ofPoa,Polygonum,Allium,Gagea, etc., this phenomenon is constant in plants growing in damp situations.
Prolepsis.—It frequently happens that branches or whole plants are suddenly defoliated in summer,—e.g.by caterpillars or other insects—at a time when considerable stores of reserves had already been accumulated during the period of active assimilation. In such cases the axillary buds, which would normally have passed into a dormant condition over the winter had the leaves lived till the autumn-fall, suddenly shoot out intoprolepticshoots (also termed Lammas shoots), and reclothe the tree with foliage. The wood of the year in which this occurs may exhibit a double annual ring, and the vigour of the tree is likely to suffer in the following season and no fruit be matured.
Proleptic branches may also be due to the shooting out of accessory buds—i.e.extra buds found in or near the leaf-axils of many plants, such as Willow, Maples,Cercis,Robinia,Syringa,Aristolochia, etc.—which do not normally come to anything, or do so only if a surplus of food materials is provided.
Dormant buds, orpreventitious buds, are such as receive no sufficient supply of water and food materials to enable them to open with the other buds in ordinary years, for in most trees only the upper buds on the branches develop into new shoots. The lower buds do not die, however, but merely keep pace with the growth in thickness of the parent branch, and may be elongated sufficiently each year to raise the minute tips level with the bark, their proper cambium only remaining alive but not thickening the bud.
When, by the breaking of the branch above the insertion of the dormant bud—or by pruning, defoliation by insects, etc.—the transpiration current and supplies of food materials are in any way deflected to the minute cambium and growing points of the dormant buds, they are stimulated to normal growth, and may grow out asepicormic shootsor "shoots from the old wood." In many cases such epicormic shoots are stimulated to grow out by suddenly exposing an old tree to more favourable conditions of root-action and assimilatory activity, owing to the felling of competing trees which previously hemmed it in from light and air, and restricted the spread and action of its roots in the soil. This is often seen in old Elms, Limes, etc.
It is by such means as the above that substitution branches are obtained when a leader is broken or cut away.
Adventitious budsare such as are newly formed from callus or other tissues in places not normally provided with buds, as is often seen on occluding wounds—e.g.stool shoots. They may also be developed on roots, a fact utilised in propagatingBouvardias, Horse-radish, etc., by means of root-cuttings, and thesuckersof Plums and other fruit trees are shoots springing from adventitious buds on roots.
Adventitious buds are also common on leaves (e.g.Bryophyllum, Ferns, etc.), and are frequently induced on them by wounds—e.g.Gesneria,Gloxinia, etc. Even cut cotyledons may developthem, and pieces of leafless inflorescence (Hyacinth), hypocotyl (Anagallis), and in fact practically any wounded tissue with a store of reserve materials may be made to develop them: thus they have been found arising from the pith of Sea-kale, and are commonly developed from the cut bulb scales of Hyacinths.
AposporyandApogamyare particular cases of the production of vegetative buds on the leaves in place of sporangia in Ferns (Apospory), and on prothallia in place of Archegonia (Apogamy), in the latter case induced by dry conditions and strong illumination.
In addition to the literature quoted in thenotes to Chapter XXVII., the student should consult the works on Forest Botany for the scattered information regarding adventitious buds. A good account may be found in Büsgen,Bau und Leben unserer Waldbäume, Jena, 1897.For Apospory and Apogamy, see Lang "On Apogamy and the Development of Sporangia upon Fern Prothalli,"Phil. Trans., vol. 190, 1898, p. 187, where the literature is collected.
In addition to the literature quoted in thenotes to Chapter XXVII., the student should consult the works on Forest Botany for the scattered information regarding adventitious buds. A good account may be found in Büsgen,Bau und Leben unserer Waldbäume, Jena, 1897.
For Apospory and Apogamy, see Lang "On Apogamy and the Development of Sporangia upon Fern Prothalli,"Phil. Trans., vol. 190, 1898, p. 187, where the literature is collected.
Grafting—Comparison with cuttings—Effects of environment—Relations between scion and stock—Variation in grafts—Grafting and parasitism—Infection—Pollination—Grafts-hybrids—Predisposition of Natural grafts—Root-fusions.
Grafting—Comparison with cuttings—Effects of environment—Relations between scion and stock—Variation in grafts—Grafting and parasitism—Infection—Pollination—Grafts-hybrids—Predisposition of Natural grafts—Root-fusions.
Grafting is a process which consists in bringing the cambium of a shoot of one plant into direct union with that of another, and is practised in various ways, the commonest of which is as follows:
One plant—thestock—rooted in the ground, is cut off a short distance above the surface of the soil, and a shoot from the second plant—thescion—cut off obliquely with a sharp knife, is inserted into a cleft in the stock, so that the two cambiums (and sometimes the cortex and pith of each as well) are in close contact: the scion is then tied in position, the wounds covered with grafting wax, and the whole left until union of the tissues is completed. This union depends on theformation ofcallusat the cut surfaces, and the intimate union of the ingrowing cells from each callus.
The development of the callus follows the course described for wounds, cuttings, etc., and the union is exactly comparable to the union of the two lips of a healing callus over a wound (seep. 197).
Grafting was known and practised far back in the ages. Virgil was well acquainted with the process, and Theophrastus compared it with propagation by cuttings.
The scion differs from a cutting, however, in having no roots of its own: it is parasitic upon, or rather is in symbiosis with the stock, the root and tissues of which intervene between it and the soil. Consequently the selective absorption, size and number of vessels, and innumerable other physiological and anatomical peculiarities of the stock determine what and how much shall go up into the scion, while the latter supplies the former with organic materials and rules what and how much food, enzymes, and other secretions, etc., it shall receive to build up its substance. Surely, then, if such factors as the nature of the soil, the water and mineral supplies, the illumination, and the various climatic factors of altitude can cause variations on a plant direct, these and other factors are still more likely to be effective on stock and scion, and each must affect the other.
Nevertheless opinions have differed much as to whether any important effect is to be seen, and onno point more than on whether the scion can affect the stock, in spite of such examples asCytisus Adami,GarreyaonAucuba, Sunflower on Jerusalem Artichoke, etc. Recent results, especially of experiments with herbaceous plants, show that not only can the stock affect the scion (andvice versa) directly, but the effect of the changes may be invisible on the grafted plant and only show itself in the progeny raised from the seed of the grafted plant. In other words, variation occurs in grafts eitherdirectly, as the results of the effects of the environment on the graft, or owing to the interaction of scion and stock, showing as changes in general nutrition in the tissues concerned, etc., owing to special reactions of the protoplasm of the uniting cells one on the other, and of the results of the further protoplasmic secretions, sortings, and so forth, on the cells developed as descendants of these in the further growth of the graft: orindirectly, in that some of these changes so alter the nature of the special protoplasm put aside for reproductive purposes, that the resulting embryo in the seed transmits the effects, and they show as variations in the seedling. If these results are confirmed they should meet all objections that have been urged against the transmission of acquired characters.
In fact there are analogies between grafting and parasitism which cannot be overlooked, and should not be underestimated, their commonest expression appearing in the alterations in stature, habit, period of ripening, and so forth. These analogiesare easily apprehended when we compare parasites like the Mistletoe,Loranthus, or even such root-parasites as the Broom-rapes and the Rhinanthoideae with grafts; but they also exist in the case of many fungus-parasites, and we might almost as accurately speak ofgraftingsome fungi on their hosts as ofinfectingthe latter with them, especially when it is borne in mind that the effect of the scion on the stock is by no means always to the benefit of the latter, and that there are reasons for regarding the action of some such unions as that of a sort of slow poisoning of the stock by the scion. Why do we not here say that the stock has beeninfectedby the scion?
The resemblances between pollination and the infection by fungus hyphae may also be insisted upon. If we take into account Darwin's remarkable experiments showing that in "illegitimate unions" the pollen exerts a sort of poisonous action on the stigmas or ovules, it is possible to arrange a series of cases starting with perfectly legitimate pollinations where the pollen tube feeds as it descends the style on materials provided by the cells, and proceeding to cases where the pollen is more and more merely just able to penetrate the ovary and reach the ovules, to the extreme cases where no union at all is possible.
Side by side with such series could be arranged analogous cases where fungus spores can enter and infect the cells of the host, and live symbiotically with or even in them, or can penetrate only withdifficulty, or with poisonous effects, and finally cannot infect the plant at all.
Less obviously, but nevertheless existing, are gradations in grafting to be observed, where one and the same stock may be successfully combined with a scion which improves it—or which is improved by it—or the scion may unite but acts injuriously on it, or, finally, cannot be induced to unite.
But we may go further than this in these comparisons. Just as the results of pollination frequently induce far-reaching effects on distant tissues—e.g.the swelling of Orchid ovaries, and rapid fading of the floral organs—so also the effects of hyphae in the tissues may induce hypertrophies, deflection of nutrient materials, and the atrophy of distant parts—e.g.the curious phenomena observed inEuphorbiaattacked byUromyces—and some of the distant actions in grafts may be compared similarly.
Going still further, we may compare the effects of cross-breeding or of hybridisation, where theprogenyshow that changes have resulted from the mutual interactions and reactions of the commingled protoplasm, with Daniel's results, in which he obtains proof of such interactions of the commingled protoplasmic cell-contents of grafts in the seedling progeny; although there is no probability—we may even say possibility—in this latter case that the effects are due to nuclear fusions, but only that the germ-plasm of the seed-bearing plant has beenaffected by the changes in the cell-protoplasm which nourishes it when the reproductive cells are forming.
In the case of graft-hybrids the matter appears to be somewhat different, and we may well suppose, with Strasburger, that the commingling of characters observed in flowers, fruits, foliage, etc., on shoots borne after grafting are due to the occurrence of nuclear fusions during the union of the grafted tissues; though it is by no means impossible that what has really happened is profound alterations in the nuclear substance (germ-plasm) owing to its being nourished by cell-protoplasm (somato-plasm) which has been itself affected by the interchanges of substance between scion and stock, and therefore itself furnishes a different nutrient medium from the unaltered cytoplasm of either.
But even here we can find parallels among the ordinary phenomena of plant reproduction. Maize plants with white endosperm containing starch, if crossed by pollen from other plants with purple endosperm containing sugar, bear seeds with purple endosperm containing sugar, and suchXeniamay be compared to graft-hybrids in many respects.
I know of no case among fungus infections which could be compared directly with these examples, and it is not at all likely that we shall meet with any instance of a fungus-hypha handing over nuclear substance to an egg-cell, and so affecting the latter that an embryo results.But the case is not hypothetically impossible, although the distant relationships of the two groups of organisms render it extremely improbable among the higher plants. It is by no means so improbable, however, that further research may show cases where the egg-cell of a lower cryptogam—e.g.another fungus—may be affected either directly, or indirectly, by the protoplasm of a parasitic or symbiotic hypha, as suggested by the extraordinary phenomena of symbiosis.
Some of the variations in grafted plants are found to predispose the plant to disease, or the reverse, and cases may be cited where the resulting shoots, foliage, or fruits, or seedlings more readily fall a prey to, or resist, parasitic fungi and insects than the ungrafted plants. Daniel gives instances of such—e.g.among other examples, Peas grafted on Beans yield seeds which suffer more from Erysipheae than the normal seedlings. But the best known cases are those of Vines in their relations toPhylloxera, already referred to (p. 155).
Several instances are also known where grafted plants show more or less resistance to such factors of the environment as low temperatures; grafted or budded Roses often suffer much from Erysipheae, and so forth. Much research is still needed to determine how far these matters depend on real alterations in the nature of the graft, orare only true for the localities in which the experiments have been made, a point which has, I think, been overlooked by all observers.
Grafted plants are apparently very much exposed to injury by slugs, insects, and the invasions of parasites during the healing of the callus and the fusion process. Here again it must not be overlooked that the callus is, so to speak, a tit-bit of luscious, thin-walled, succulent tissue; and, like all wounds, the graft affords entrance to parasites such asNectriaand Ascomycetes of various kinds, under circumstances very favourable to their invasion.
Natural Grafts.—It is by no means an uncommon event to find the branches of Beeches, Limes, and other trees which have been accidentally brought into contact during growth, joined where they cross. As they press one against the other, they become naturally grafted, by that form of the process known asinarching: except that in artificial inarching the operator cuts off the cortical tissues of the two branches and brings their cambial surfaces together, whereas in nature the cambiums only come into contact after the destruction by pressure, or slight abrasion, of the entrapped intervening tissues. The fusion occurs, in fact, exactly as in the burying-in of a nail or wire, referred to onp. 211.
Natural grafts are very common among the roots of trees, and possibly explain some queer cases of the apparent revivification of stumps of trees not usually given to forming abundant stool shoots. It is regarded as probable in some old forests that the majority of the roots of trees of the same species are linked up together by suchnatural grafts, a probability not diminished by the fact that such roots cross at many points, and are easily grafted.