This early clarinet or improved chalumeau has a clarinet mouthpiece, but no bulb; it measures 50 cm. (20 in.), whereas the one in A mentioned above is only 28 cm. in length, the long cylindrical tube between mouthpiece and key-joint, afterwards turned into the bulb, being absent. Mahillon was probably the first to point out that the so-called invention of the clarinet by J.C. Denner consisted in providing a device—the speaker-key—to facilitate the production of the harmonics of the fundamental. Can we be sure that the same result was not obtained on the old chalumeau before keys were added, by partially uncovering the hole for the thumb?
The Berlin museum possesses an early clarinet with two keys, marked J.B. Oberlender, derived from the Snoeck collection. Paul de Wit’s collection has a similar specimen by Enkelmer. The Brussels Conservatoire possesses clarinets with two keys by Flemish makers, G.A. Rottenburgh and J.B. Willems27; the latter, with a small bulb and bell, is in G a fifth above the C clarinet. The next improvements in the clarinet, made in 1720, are due to J. Denner, probably a son of J.C. Denner. They consisted in the addition of a bell and in the removal of the speaker-hole and key nearer the mouthpiece, involving the reduction of the diameter of the hole. The effect of this change of position was to turn the Bâ™® into Bâ™, for J. Denner introduced into the hole, nearly as far as the axis of the bore, a small metal drainage tube28for the moisture of the breath. In the modern clarinet, the same result is attained by raising this little tube slightly above the surface of the main tube, placing a key on the top of it, and bending the lever. In order to produce the missing Bâ™®, J. Denner lengthened the tube and pierced another hole, the low E, covered by an open key with a long lever which, when closed, gives the desired B as its twelfth, thus forming a connexion between the two registers. A clarinet with three keys, of similar construction (about 1750), marked J.W. Kenigsperger, is preserved in the Bavarian national museum, at Munich. Another in Bâ™ marked Lindner29belongs to the collection at Brussels. About the middle of the 18th century, the number of keys was raised to five, some say30by Barthold Fritz of Brunswick (1697-1766), who added keys for C♯ and D♯.According to Altenburg31the Eâ™ or D♯ key is due to the virtuoso Joseph Beer (1744-1811). The sixth key was added about 1790 by the celebrated French virtuoso Xavier Lefébure (or Lefèvre), and produced G♯.Anton Stadler and his brother, both clarinettists in the Vienna court orchestra and instrument-makers, are said to have lengthened the tube of the Bâ™ clarinet, extending the compass down to C (real sound Bâ™). It was for the Stadler brothers that Mozart wrote his quintet for strings, with a fine obbligato for the clarinet in A (1789), and the clarinet concerto with orchestra in 1791.
This, then, was the state of the clarinet in 1810 when Ivan Müller, then living in Paris, carried the number of keys up to thirteen, and made several structural improvements already mentioned, which gave us the modern instrument and inaugurated a new era in the construction and technique of the clarinet. Müller’s system is still adopted in principle by most clarinet makers. The instrument was successively improved during the 19th century by the Belgian makers Bachmann, the elder Sax, Albert and C. Mahillon, whose invention in 1862 of the C♯ key with double action is now generally adopted. In Paris the labours of Lefébure, Buffet-Crampon, and Goumas are pre-eminent. In 1842 H.E. Klosé conceived the idea of adapting to the clarinet the ingenious mechanism of movable rings, invented by Boehm for the flute, and he entrusted the execution of this innovation to Buffet-Crampon; this is the type of clarinet generally adopted in French orchestras. From this adaptation has sprung the erroneous notion that Klosé’s clarinet was constructed according to the Boehm system; Klosé’s lateral divisions of the tube do not follow those applied by Boehm to the flute.
In England the clarinet has also passed through several progressive stages since its introduction about 1770, and first ofall at the hands of Cornelius Ward. The principal improvements were due to Richard Carte, who took out a patent in 1858 for an improved Boehm clarinet which possessed some claim to the name, since Boehm’s principle of boring the holes at theoretically correct intervals and of venting the holes by means of open holes below was carried out. Carte made several modifications of his original patent, his chief endeavour being to so dispose the key-work as to reduce the difficulties in fingering. By the extension of the principle of the ring action, the work of the third and little fingers of the left hand was simplified and the fingering of certain difficult notes and shakes greatly facilitated. Messrs Rudall, Carte & Company have made further improvements in the clarinet, which are embodied in Klussmann’s patent (fig. 4); these consist in the introduction of the duplicate G♯ key, a note which has hitherto formed a serious obstacle to perfect execution. The duplicate key, operated by the third or second finger of the right hand, releases the fourth finger of the left hand. The old G♯ is still retained and may be used in the usual way if desired. The body of the instrument is now made in one joint, and the position of the G♯ hole is mathematically correct, whereby perfect intonation for C♯, G♯ and F♮ is secured. Other improvements were made in Paris by Messrs Evette & Schaeffer and by M. Paradis,32a clarinet-player in the band of the Garde Républicaine, and very great improvements in boring and in key mechanism were effected by Albert of Brussels (see fig. 1).
The clarinet appears to have received appreciation in the Netherlands earlier than in its own native land. According to W. Altenburg (op. cit. p. 11),33a MS. is preserved in the cathedral at Antwerp of a mass written by A.J. Faber in 1720, which is scored for a clarinet. Johann Mattheson,34Kapellmeisterat Hamburg, mentions clarinet music in 1713, although Handel, whose rival he was, does not appear to have known the instrument. Joh. Christ. Bach scored for the clarinet in 1763 in his operaOrioneperformed in London, and Rameau had already employed the instrument in 1751 in a theatre for his pastoral entitledAcante et Céphise.35The clarinet was formally introduced into the orchestra in Vienna in 1767,36Gluck having contented himself with the use of the chalumeau inOrfeo(1762) and inAlceste(1767).37The clarinet had already been adopted in military bands in France in 1755, where it very speedily completely replaced the oboe. One of Napoleon Bonaparte’s bands is said to have had no less than twenty clarinets.
For further information on the clarinet at the beginning of the 19th century, consult theMethodsby Ivan Müller and Xavier Lefébure, and Joseph Froehlich’s admirable work on the instruments of the orchestra; and Gottfried Weber’s articles in Ersch and Gruber’sEncyclopaedia. See alsoBasset Horn;Bass ClarinetandPedal Clarinet.
For further information on the clarinet at the beginning of the 19th century, consult theMethodsby Ivan Müller and Xavier Lefébure, and Joseph Froehlich’s admirable work on the instruments of the orchestra; and Gottfried Weber’s articles in Ersch and Gruber’sEncyclopaedia. See alsoBasset Horn;Bass ClarinetandPedal Clarinet.
(K. S.)
1See Gottfried Weber’s objection to this derivation in “Über Clarinette und Basset-horn,â€Caecilia(Mainz, 1829), vol. xi. pp. 36 and 37, note.2Nos. 3 and 4 are sometimes made in one, as for instance in Messrs Rudall, Carte & Company’s modification, the Klussmann patent.3Aristotle (de Audib.802 b 18, and 804 a) and Porphyry (ed. Wallis, pp. 249 and 252) mention that if the performer presses thezeuge(mouthpiece) or theglottai(reeds) of the pipes, a sharper tone is produced.4Cf. V.C. Mahillon,Éléments d’acoustique musicale et instrumentale(Brussels, 1874), p. 161; and Fr. Zamminer,Die Musik und die musikalischen Instrumente in ihrer Beziehung zu den Gesetzen der Akustik ...(Giessen, 1855), pp. 297 and 298.5“The Aulos or Tibia,â€Harvard Studies, iv. (Boston, 1893).6De Musica, 1138.7Op. cit.pp. 160 et seq.; and Wilhelm Altenburg,Die Klarinette(Heilbronn, 1904), p. 9, who refers to Mahillon.8See Macrobius,Comm. in somnium Scipionis, ii. 4. 5 “nec secus probamus in tibiis de quarum foraminibus vicinis inflantis ori sonus acutus emittitur, de longinquis autem et termino proximis, gravior: item acutior per patentiora foramina, gravior per angusta.â€9See Victor Loret,L’Égypte au temps des Pharaons—la vie, le science, et l’art(Paris, 1889), illustration p. 139 and p. 143. The author gives no information about this fresco except that it is in the Musée Guimet. It is probably identical with the second of the mural paintings described on p. 190 ofPetit guide illustré au Musée Guimet, par L. de Milloue.10See Victor Loret, “Les flûtes égyptiennes antiques,â€Journal asiatique(Paris, 1889), [8], xiv. pp. 129, 130, 132.11See also A.A. Howard, “Study on the Aulos or Tibia,â€Harvard Studies, vol. iv. (Boston, 1893); F.C. Gevaert,Musique de l’antiquité; Carl von Jan, article “Floete†in August Baumeister’sDenkmäler des klassischen Alterthums(Leipzig, 1884-1888), vol. i.; Dr Hugo Riemann,Handbuch der Musikgesch.vol. i. p. 90, &c. (Leipzig, 1904); all of whom have not come to the same conclusions.12Wilhelm Froehner,La Colonne trajane(Paris, 1872), t. ii. pl. 76.13“Aveuc aus ert vestus GuisKi leur cante et Kalemele,En la muse au grant bourdon.â€J.A.U. Scheler’sTrouvères belges.14See Ernest Thoinan,Les Hotteterre et les Chédeville, célèbres facteurs de flûtes, hautbois, bassons et musettes(Paris, 1894), p. 15 et seq., andMéthode pour la musette, &c., par Hotteterre le Romain (Paris, 1737).15The whole series of 135 plates has been reproduced inJahrb. d. Samml. des Alterh. Kaiserhauses(Vienna, 1883-1884).16Musica getutscht und auszgezogen(Basel, 1511).17Musica Instrumentalis Deudsch(Nuremberg, 1528 and 1545).18Syntagma Musicum(Wolfenbüttel, 1618). This work and those mentioned in the two previous notes have been reprinted by the Ges. f. Musikforschung in vols. xi., xx. and xiii. ofPublikationen(Berlin).19SeeDescriptive Catalogue, by Capt. C.R. Day (London, 1891), pl. iv. A and p. 110, No. 221.20Wappenbuch, p. 111, “Musica.â€21Paris, 1767, vol. v. “Planches,†pl. ix. 20, 21, 22.22Dr Theofilo Muffat, “Componimenti musicali per il cembalo,†inDenkmäler d. Tonkunst in Österreich, Bd. iii.23Historische Nachricht von den Nürnbergischen Mathematicis u. Künstlern, &c. (Nuremberg, 1730), p. 305.24Histoire de la musique aux Pays Bas avant le XIXe siècle.25For a facsimile of one of the Pompeii tibiae, see Capt. C.R. Day,op. cit.pl. iv. C. and p. 109.26Catalogue descriptif(Ghent, 1896), vol. ii. p. 211, No. 911, where an illustration is given. See also Capt. C.R. Day,op. cit.pl. iv. B andErratawhere the description is printed.27For a description with illustration see V. Mahillon’sCatalogue descriptif(Ghent, 1896), vol. ii. p. 215, No. 916.28See Wilhelm Altenburg, op. cit. p. 6.29See V. Mahillon,Catal. descript.(1896), p. 213, No. 913.30H. Welcker von Gontershausen,Die musikalischen Tonwerk-zeuge(Frankfort-on-Main, 1855), p. 141.31Op. cit. p. 6.32See Capt. C.R. Day, op. cit. p. 106.33V. Mahillon,Catal. desc.(1880), p. 182, refers his statement to the Chevalier L. de Burbure.34Das neu-eröffnete Orchester(Hamburg, 1713).35Mahillon,Catal. desc.(1880), vol. i. p. 182.36See Chevalier Ludwig von Koechel,Die kaiserliche Hofmusik-kapelle zu Wien, 1543-1867(Vienna, 1869).37In the Italian edition of 1769 the part is scored for clarinet.
1See Gottfried Weber’s objection to this derivation in “Über Clarinette und Basset-horn,â€Caecilia(Mainz, 1829), vol. xi. pp. 36 and 37, note.
2Nos. 3 and 4 are sometimes made in one, as for instance in Messrs Rudall, Carte & Company’s modification, the Klussmann patent.
3Aristotle (de Audib.802 b 18, and 804 a) and Porphyry (ed. Wallis, pp. 249 and 252) mention that if the performer presses thezeuge(mouthpiece) or theglottai(reeds) of the pipes, a sharper tone is produced.
4Cf. V.C. Mahillon,Éléments d’acoustique musicale et instrumentale(Brussels, 1874), p. 161; and Fr. Zamminer,Die Musik und die musikalischen Instrumente in ihrer Beziehung zu den Gesetzen der Akustik ...(Giessen, 1855), pp. 297 and 298.
5“The Aulos or Tibia,â€Harvard Studies, iv. (Boston, 1893).
6De Musica, 1138.
7Op. cit.pp. 160 et seq.; and Wilhelm Altenburg,Die Klarinette(Heilbronn, 1904), p. 9, who refers to Mahillon.
8See Macrobius,Comm. in somnium Scipionis, ii. 4. 5 “nec secus probamus in tibiis de quarum foraminibus vicinis inflantis ori sonus acutus emittitur, de longinquis autem et termino proximis, gravior: item acutior per patentiora foramina, gravior per angusta.â€
9See Victor Loret,L’Égypte au temps des Pharaons—la vie, le science, et l’art(Paris, 1889), illustration p. 139 and p. 143. The author gives no information about this fresco except that it is in the Musée Guimet. It is probably identical with the second of the mural paintings described on p. 190 ofPetit guide illustré au Musée Guimet, par L. de Milloue.
10See Victor Loret, “Les flûtes égyptiennes antiques,â€Journal asiatique(Paris, 1889), [8], xiv. pp. 129, 130, 132.
11See also A.A. Howard, “Study on the Aulos or Tibia,â€Harvard Studies, vol. iv. (Boston, 1893); F.C. Gevaert,Musique de l’antiquité; Carl von Jan, article “Floete†in August Baumeister’sDenkmäler des klassischen Alterthums(Leipzig, 1884-1888), vol. i.; Dr Hugo Riemann,Handbuch der Musikgesch.vol. i. p. 90, &c. (Leipzig, 1904); all of whom have not come to the same conclusions.
12Wilhelm Froehner,La Colonne trajane(Paris, 1872), t. ii. pl. 76.
13
“Aveuc aus ert vestus GuisKi leur cante et Kalemele,En la muse au grant bourdon.â€J.A.U. Scheler’sTrouvères belges.
“Aveuc aus ert vestus Guis
Ki leur cante et Kalemele,
En la muse au grant bourdon.â€
J.A.U. Scheler’sTrouvères belges.
14See Ernest Thoinan,Les Hotteterre et les Chédeville, célèbres facteurs de flûtes, hautbois, bassons et musettes(Paris, 1894), p. 15 et seq., andMéthode pour la musette, &c., par Hotteterre le Romain (Paris, 1737).
15The whole series of 135 plates has been reproduced inJahrb. d. Samml. des Alterh. Kaiserhauses(Vienna, 1883-1884).
16Musica getutscht und auszgezogen(Basel, 1511).
17Musica Instrumentalis Deudsch(Nuremberg, 1528 and 1545).
18Syntagma Musicum(Wolfenbüttel, 1618). This work and those mentioned in the two previous notes have been reprinted by the Ges. f. Musikforschung in vols. xi., xx. and xiii. ofPublikationen(Berlin).
19SeeDescriptive Catalogue, by Capt. C.R. Day (London, 1891), pl. iv. A and p. 110, No. 221.
20Wappenbuch, p. 111, “Musica.â€
21Paris, 1767, vol. v. “Planches,†pl. ix. 20, 21, 22.
22Dr Theofilo Muffat, “Componimenti musicali per il cembalo,†inDenkmäler d. Tonkunst in Österreich, Bd. iii.
23Historische Nachricht von den Nürnbergischen Mathematicis u. Künstlern, &c. (Nuremberg, 1730), p. 305.
24Histoire de la musique aux Pays Bas avant le XIXe siècle.
25For a facsimile of one of the Pompeii tibiae, see Capt. C.R. Day,op. cit.pl. iv. C. and p. 109.
26Catalogue descriptif(Ghent, 1896), vol. ii. p. 211, No. 911, where an illustration is given. See also Capt. C.R. Day,op. cit.pl. iv. B andErratawhere the description is printed.
27For a description with illustration see V. Mahillon’sCatalogue descriptif(Ghent, 1896), vol. ii. p. 215, No. 916.
28See Wilhelm Altenburg, op. cit. p. 6.
29See V. Mahillon,Catal. descript.(1896), p. 213, No. 913.
30H. Welcker von Gontershausen,Die musikalischen Tonwerk-zeuge(Frankfort-on-Main, 1855), p. 141.
31Op. cit. p. 6.
32See Capt. C.R. Day, op. cit. p. 106.
33V. Mahillon,Catal. desc.(1880), p. 182, refers his statement to the Chevalier L. de Burbure.
34Das neu-eröffnete Orchester(Hamburg, 1713).
35Mahillon,Catal. desc.(1880), vol. i. p. 182.
36See Chevalier Ludwig von Koechel,Die kaiserliche Hofmusik-kapelle zu Wien, 1543-1867(Vienna, 1869).
37In the Italian edition of 1769 the part is scored for clarinet.
CLARK, SIR ANDREW, Bart. (1826-1893), British physician, was born at Aberdeen on the 28th of October 1826. His father, who also was a medical man, died when he was only a few years old. After attending school in Aberdeen, he was sent by his guardians to Dundee and apprenticed to a druggist; then returning to Aberdeen he began his medical studies in the university of that city. Soon, however, he went to Edinburgh, where in the extra-academical school he had a student’s career of the most brilliant description, ultimately becoming assistant to J. Hughes Bennett in the pathological department of the Royal Infirmary, and assistant demonstrator of anatomy to Robert Knox. But symptoms of pulmonary phthisis brought his academic life to a close, and in the hope that the sea might benefit his health he joined the medical department of the navy in 1848. Next year he became pathologist to the Haslar hospital, where T.H. Huxley was one of his colleagues, and in 1853 he was the successful candidate for the newly-instituted post of curator to the museum of the London hospital. Here he intended to devote all his energies to pathology, but circumstances brought him into active medical practice. In 1854, the year in which he took his doctor’s degree at Aberdeen, the post of assistant-physician to the hospital became vacant and he was prevailed upon to apply for it. He was fond of telling how his phthisical tendencies gained him the appointment. “He is only a poor Scotch doctor,†it was said, “with but a few months to live; let him have it.†He had it, and two years before his death publicly declared that of those who were on the staff of the hospital at the time of his selection he was the only one remaining alive. In 1854 he became a member of the College of Physicians, and in 1858 a fellow, and then went in succession through all the offices of honour the college has to offer, ending in 1888 with the presidency, which he continued to hold till his death. From the time of his selection as assistant physician to the London hospital, his fame rapidly grew until he became a fashionable doctor with one of the largest practices in London, counting among his patients some of the most distinguished men of the day. The great number of persons who passed through his consulting-room every morning rendered it inevitable that to a large extent his advice should become stereotyped and his prescriptions often reduced to mere stock formulae, but in really serious cases he was not to be surpassed in the skill and carefulness of his diagnosis and in his attention to detail. In spite of the claims of his practice he found time to produce a good many books, all written in the precise and polished style on which he used to pride himself. Doubtless owing largely to personal reasons, lung diseases and especially fibroid phthisis formed his favourite theme, but he also discussed other subjects, such as renal inadequacy, anaemia, constipation, &c. He died in London on the 6th of November 1893, after a paralytic stroke which was probably the result of persistent overwork.
CLARK, FRANCIS EDWARD(1851-  ), American clergyman, was born of New England ancestry at Aylmer, Province of Quebec, Canada, on the 12th of September 1851. He was the son of Charles C. Symmes, but took the name of an uncle, the Rev. E.W. Clark, by whom he was adopted after his father’s death in 1853. He graduated at Dartmouth College in 1873 and at Andover Theological Seminary in 1876, was ordained in the Congregational ministry, and was pastor of the Williston Congregational church at Portland, Maine, from 1876 to 1883, and of the Phillips Congregational church, South Boston, Mass., from 1883 to 1887. On the 2nd of February 1881 he founded at Portland the Young People’s Society of Christian Endeavor, which, beginning as a small society in a single New England church, developed into a great interdenominational organization, which in 1908 had 70,761 societies and more than 3,500,000 members scattered throughout the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, South Africa, India, Japan and China. After 1887 he devoted his time entirely to the extension of this work, and was president of the United Societies of Christian Endeavor and of the World’s Christian Endeavor Union, and editor of theChristian Endeavor World(originallyThe Golden Rule). Among his numerous publications areThe Children and the Church(1882);Looking Out on Life(1883);Young People’s Prayer Meetings(1884);Some Christian Endeavor Saints(1889);World-Wide Endeavor(1895);A New Way Round an Old World(1900).
See hisThe Young People’s Christian Endeavor, where it began, &c.(Boston, 1895);Christian Endeavor Manual(Boston, 1903); andChristian Endeavor in All Lands: Record of Twenty-five Years of Progress(Philadelphia, 1907).
See hisThe Young People’s Christian Endeavor, where it began, &c.(Boston, 1895);Christian Endeavor Manual(Boston, 1903); andChristian Endeavor in All Lands: Record of Twenty-five Years of Progress(Philadelphia, 1907).
CLARK, GEORGE ROGERS(1752-1818), American frontier military leader, was born near Charlottesville, in Albemarle county, Virginia, on the 19th of November 1752. Early in life he became a land-surveyor; he took part in Lord Dunmore’s War (1774), and in 1775 went as a surveyor for the Ohio Company to Kentucky (then a district of Virginia), whither he removed early in 1776. His iron will, strong passions, audacious courage and magnificent physique soon made him a leader among his frontier neighbours, by whom in 1776 he was sent as a delegate to the Virginia legislature. In this capacity he was instrumental in bringing about the organization of Kentucky as a county of Virginia, and also obtained from Governor Patrick Henry a supply of powder for the Kentucky settlers. Convinced that the Indians were instigated and supported in their raids against the American settlers by British officers stationed in the forts north of the Ohio river, and that the conquest of those forts would put an end to the evil, he went on foot to Virginia late in 1777 and submitted to Governor Henry and his council a plan for offensive operations. On the 2nd of January 1778 he was commissioned lieutenant-colonel, received £1200 in depreciated currency, and was authorized to enlist troops; and by the end of May he was at the falls of the Ohio (the site of Louisville) with about 175 men. The expedition proceeded to Fort Kaskaskia, on the Mississippi, in what is now Illinois. This place and Cahokia, also on the Mississippi, near St Louis, were defended by small British garrisons, which depended upon the support of the Frenchhabitants. The French being willing to accept the authority of Virginia, both forts were easily taken. Clark gained the friendship of Father Pierre Gibault, the priest at Kaskaskia, and through his influence the French at Vincennes on the Wabash were induced (late in July) to change their allegiance. On the 17th of December Lieut.-Governor Henry Hamilton, the British commander at Detroit, recovered Vincennes and went into winter quarters. Late in February 1779 he was surprised by Clark and compelled to give up Vincennes and its fort, Fort Sackville, and to surrender himself and his garrison of about 80 men, as prisoners of war. With the exception of Detroit and several other posts on the Canadian frontier the whole of the North-West was thus brought under American influence; many of the Indians, previously hostile, became friendly, and the United States was put in a position to demand the cession of the North-West in the treaty of 1783. For this valuable service, in which Clark had freely used his own private funds, he received practically no recompense either from Virginia or from the United States, and for many years before his death he lived in poverty. To him and his men, however, the Virginia legislature granted 150,000 acres of land in 1781, which was subsequently located in what are now Clark, Floyd and Scott counties, Indiana; Clark’s individual share was 8049 acres, but from this he realized little. Clark built Fort Jefferson on the Mississippi, 4 or 5 m. below the mouth of the Ohio, in 1780, destroyed the Indian towns Chillicothe and Piqua in the same year, and in November 1782 destroyed the Indian towns on the Miami river. With this last expedition his active military service virtually ended, and in July 1783 he was relieved of his command by Virginia. Thereafter he lived on part of the land granted to him by Virginia or in Louisville for the rest of his life. In 1793 he accepted from Citizen Genet a commission as “major-general in the armies of France, and commander-in-chief of the French Revolutionary Legion in the Mississippi Valley,†and tried to raise a force for an attack upon the Spanish possessions in the valley of the Mississippi. The scheme, however, was abandoned after Genet’s recall. Disappointed at what he regarded as his country’s ingratitude, and broken down by excessive drinking and paralysis, he lost his once powerful influence and lived in comparative isolation until his death, near Louisville, Kentucky, on the 13th of February 1818.
See W.H. English,Conquest of the Country north-west of the River Ohio, 1778-1783, and Life of George Rogers Clark(2 vols., Indianapolis and Kansas City, 1896), an accurate and detailed work, which represents an immense amount of research among both printed and manuscript sources. Clark’s own accounts of his expeditions, and other interesting documents, are given in the appendix to this work.
See W.H. English,Conquest of the Country north-west of the River Ohio, 1778-1783, and Life of George Rogers Clark(2 vols., Indianapolis and Kansas City, 1896), an accurate and detailed work, which represents an immense amount of research among both printed and manuscript sources. Clark’s own accounts of his expeditions, and other interesting documents, are given in the appendix to this work.
Clark, William(1770-1838), the well-known explorer, was the youngest brother of the foregoing. He was born in Caroline county, Virginia, on the 1st of August 1770. At the age of fourteen he removed with his parents to Kentucky, settling at the falls of the Ohio (Louisville). He entered the United States army as a lieutenant of infantry in March 1792, and served under General Anthony Wayne against the Indians in 1794. In July 1796 he resigned his commission on account of ill-health. In 1803-1806, with Meriwether Lewis (q.v.), he commanded the famous exploring expedition across the continent to the mouth of the Columbia river, and was commissioned second lieutenant in March 1804 and first lieutenant in January 1806. In February he again resigned from the army. He then served for a few years as brigadier-general of the Louisiana territorial militia, as Indian agent for “Upper Louisiana,†as territorial governor of Missouri in 1813-1820, and as superintendent of Indian affairs at St Louis from 1822 until his death there on the 1st of September 1838.
CLARK, SIR JAMES(1788-1870), English physician, was born at Cullen, Banffshire, and was educated at the grammar school of Fordyce and at the universities of Aberdeen and Edinburgh. He served for six years as a surgeon in the army; then spent some time in travelling on the continent, in order to investigate the mineral waters and the climate of various health resorts; and for seven years he lived in Rome. In 1826 he began to practise in London. In 1835 he was appointed physician to the duchess of Kent, becoming physician in ordinary to Queen Victoria in 1837. In 1838 he was created a baronet. He publishedThe Influence of Climate in Chronic Diseases, containing valuable meteorological tables (1829), and aTreatise on Pulmonary Consumption(1835).
CLARK, JOHN BATES(1847-  ), American economist, was born at Providence, Rhode Island, on the 26th of January 1847. Educated at Brown University, Amherst College, Heidelberg and Zurich, he was appointed professor of political economy at Carleton College, Minnesota, in 1877. In 1881 he became professor of history and political science in Smith College, Massachusetts; in 1892 professor of political economy in Amherst College. He was appointed professor of political economy at Columbia University in 1895. Among his works are:The Philosophy of Wealth(1885);Wages(1889);Capital and its Earnings(1898);The Control of Trusts(1901);The Problem of Monopoly(1904); andEssentials of Economic Theory(1907).
CLARK, JOSIAH LATIMER(1822-1898), English engineer and electrician, was born on the 10th of March 1822 at Great Marlow, Bucks. His first interest was in chemical manufacturing, but in 1848 he became assistant engineer at the Menai Straits bridge under his elder brother Edwin (1814-1894), the inventor of the Clark hydraulic lift graving dock. Two years later, when his brother was appointed engineer to the Electric Telegraph Company, he again acted as his assistant, and subsequently succeeded him as chief engineer. In 1854 he took out a patent “for conveying letters or parcels between places by the pressure of air and vacuum,†and later was concerned in the construction of a large pneumatic despatch tube between the general post office and Euston station, London. About the same period he was engaged in experimental researches on the propagation of the electric current in submarine cables, on which he published a pamphlet in 1855, and in 1859 he was a member of the committee which was appointed by the government to consider the numerous failures of submarine cable enterprises. Latimer Clark paid much attention to the subject of electrical measurement, and besides designing various improvements in method and apparatus and inventing the Clark standard cell, he took a leading part in the movement for the systematization of electrical standards, which was inaugurated by the paper which he and SirC.T. Bright read on the question before the British Association in 1861. With Bright also he devised improvements in the insulation of submarine cables. In the later part of his life he was a member of several firms engaged in laying submarine cables, in manufacturing electrical appliances, and in hydraulic engineering. He died in London on the 30th of October 1898. Besides professional papers, he published anElementary Treatise on Electrical Measurement(1868), together with two books on astronomical subjects, and a memoir of Sir W.F. Cooke.
CLARK, THOMAS(1801-1867), Scottish chemist, was born at Ayr on the 31st of March 1801. In 1826 he was appointed lecturer on chemistry at the Glasgow mechanics’ institute, and in 1831 he took the degree of M.D. at the university of that city. Two years later he became professor of chemistry in Marischal College, Aberdeen, but was obliged to give up the duties of that position in 1844 through ill-health, though nominally he remained professor till 1860. His name is chiefly known in connexion with his process for softening hard waters, and his water tests, patented in 1841. The last twenty years before his death at Glasgow on the 27th of November 1867 were occupied with the study of the historical origin of the Gospels.
CLARK, WILLIAM GEORGE(1821-1878), English classical and Shakespearian scholar, was born at Barford Hall, Darlington, in March 1821. He was educated at Sedbergh and Shrewsbury schools and Trinity College, Cambridge, where he was elected fellow after a brilliant university career. In 1857 he was appointed public orator. He travelled much during the long vacations, visiting Spain, Greece, Italy and Poland. HisPeloponnesus(1858) was an important contribution to the knowledge of the country at that time. In 1853 Clark had taken orders, but left the Church in 1870 after the passing of the Clerical Disabilities Act, of which he was one of the promoters. He also resigned the public oratorship in the same year, and in consequence of illness left Cambridge in 1873. He died at York on the 6th of November 1878. He bequeathed a sum of money to his old college for the foundation of a lectureship in English literature. Although Clark was before all a classical scholar, he published little in that branch of learning. A contemplated edition of the works of Aristophanes, a task for which he was singularly fitted, was never published. He visited Italy in 1868 for the express purpose of examining the Ravenna and other MSS., and on his return began the notes to theAcharnians, but they were left in too incomplete a state to admit of publication in book form even after his death (seeJournal of Philology, viii., 1879). He established the CambridgeJournal of Philology, and cooperated with B.H. Kennedy and James Riddell in the production of the well-knownSabrinae Corolla. The work by which he is best known is the Cambridge Shakespeare (1863-1866), containing a collation of early editions and selected emendations, edited by him at first with John Glover and afterwards with W. Aldis Wright.Gazpacho(1853)gives an account of his tour in Spain; his visits to Italy at the time of Garibaldi’s insurrection, and to Poland during the insurrection of 1863, are described inVacation Tourists, ed. F. Galton, i. and iii.
H.A.J. Munro inJournal of Philology(viii. 1879) describes Clark as “the most accomplished and versatile man he ever metâ€; see also notices by W. Aldis Wright inAcademy(Nov. 23, 1878); R. Burn inAthenaeum(Nov. 16, 1878);The Times(Nov. 8, 1878);Notes and Queries, 5th series, x. (1878), p. 400.
H.A.J. Munro inJournal of Philology(viii. 1879) describes Clark as “the most accomplished and versatile man he ever metâ€; see also notices by W. Aldis Wright inAcademy(Nov. 23, 1878); R. Burn inAthenaeum(Nov. 16, 1878);The Times(Nov. 8, 1878);Notes and Queries, 5th series, x. (1878), p. 400.
CLARKE, ADAM(1762?-1832), British Nonconformist divine, was born at Moybeg, Co. Londonderry, Ireland, in 1760 or 1762. After receiving a very limited education he was apprenticed to a linen manufacturer, but, finding the employment uncongenial, he resumed school-life at the institution founded by Wesley at Kingswood, near Bristol. In 1782 he entered on the duties of the ministry, being appointed by Wesley to the Bradford (Wiltshire) circuit. His popularity as a preacher was very great, and his influence in the denomination is indicated by the fact that he was three times (1806, 1814, 1822) chosen to be president of the conference. He served twice on the London circuit, the second period being extended considerably longer than the rule allowed, at the special request of the British and Foreign Bible Society, who had employed him in the preparation of their Arabic Bible. Though ardent in his pastoral work, he found time for diligent study of Hebrew and other Oriental languages, undertaken chiefly with the view of qualifying himself for the great work of his life, hisCommentary on the Holy Scriptures(8 vols., 1810-1820). In 1802 he published aBibliographical Dictionaryin six volumes, to which he afterwards added a supplement. He was selected by the Records Commission to re-edit Rymer’sFoedera, a task which after ten years’ labour (1808-1818) he had to resign. He also wroteMemoirs of the Wesley Family(1823), and edited a large number of religious works. Honours were showered upon him (he was M.A., LL.D. of Aberdeen), and many distinguished men in church and state were his personal friends. He died in London on the 16th of August 1832.
HisMiscellaneous Workswere published in 13 vols. (1836), and aLife(3 vols.) by his son, J.B.B. Clarke, appeared in 1833.
HisMiscellaneous Workswere published in 13 vols. (1836), and aLife(3 vols.) by his son, J.B.B. Clarke, appeared in 1833.
CLARKE, SIR ANDREW(1824-1902), British soldier and administrator, son of Colonel Andrew Clarke, of Co. Donegal, Ireland, governor of West Australia, was born at Southsea, England, on the 27th of July 1824, and educated at King’s school, Canterbury. He entered the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, and obtained his commission in the army in 1844 as second lieutenant in the Royal Engineers. He was appointed to his father’s staff in West Australia, but was transferred to be A.D.C. and military secretary to the governor of Tasmania; and in 1847 he went to New Zealand to take part in the Maori War, and for some years served on Sir George Grey’s staff. He was then made surveyor-general in Victoria, took a prominent part in framing its new constitution, and held the office of minister of public lands during the first administration (1855-1857). He returned to England in 1857, and in 1863 was sent on a special mission to the West Coast of Africa. In 1864 he was appointed director of works for the navy, and held this post for nine years, being responsible for great improvements in the naval arsenals at Chatham, Portsmouth and Plymouth, and for fortifications at Malta, Cork, Bermuda and elsewhere. In 1873 he was made K.C.M.G., and became governor of the Straits Settlements, where he did most valuable work in consolidating British rule and ameliorating the condition of the people. From 1875 to 1880 he was minister of public works in India; and on his return to England in 1881, holding then the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the army, he was first appointed commandant at Chatham and then inspector-general of fortifications (1882-1886). Having attained the rank of lieutenant-general and been created G.C.M.G., he retired from official life, and in 1886 and 1893 unsuccessfully stood for parliament as a supporter of Mr Gladstone. During his last years he was agent-general for Victoria. He died on the 29th of March 1902. Both as a technical and strategical engineer and as an Imperial administrator Sir Andrew Clarke was one of the ablest and most useful public servants of his time; and his contributions to periodical literature, as well as his official memoranda, contained valuable suggestions on the subjects of imperial defence and imperial consolidation which received too little consideration at a period when the home governments were not properly alive to their importance. He is entitled to remembrance as one of those who first inculcated, from a wide practical experience, the views of imperial administration and its responsibilities, which in his last years he saw accepted by the bulk of his countrymen.
CLARKE, CHARLES COWDEN(1787-1877), English author and Shakespearian scholar, was born at Enfield, Middlesex, on the 15th of December 1787. His father, John Clarke, was a schoolmaster, among whose pupils was John Keats. Charles Clarke taught Keats his letters, and encouraged his love of poetry. He knew Charles and Mary Lamb, and afterwards became acquainted with Shelley, Leigh Hunt, Coleridge and Hazlitt. Clarke became a music publisher in partnership with Alfred Novello, and married in 1828 his partner’s sister, Mary Victoria (1809-1898), the eldest daughter of Vincent Novello. In the year after her marriage Mrs Cowden Clarke began her valuable Shakespeare concordance, which was eventuallyissued in eighteen monthly parts (1844-1845), and in volume form in 1845 asThe Complete Concordance to Shakespeare, being a Verbal Index to all the Passages in the Dramatic Works of the Poet. This work superseded theCopious Index to ... Shakespeare(1790) of Samuel Ayscough, and theComplete Verbal Index ...(1805-1807) of Francis Twiss. Charles Cowden Clarke published many useful books, and edited the text for John Nichol’s edition of the British poets; but his most important work consisted of lectures delivered between 1834 and 1856 on Shakespeare and other literary subjects. Some of the more notable series were published, among them beingShakespeare’s Characters, chiefly those subordinate(1863), andMolière’s Characters(1865). In 1859 he published a volume of original poems,Carmina Minima. For some years after their marriage the Cowden Clarkes lived with the Novellos in London. In 1849 Vincent Novello with his wife removed to Nice, where he was joined by the Clarkes in 1856. After his death they lived at Genoa at the “Villa Novello.†They collaborated inThe Shakespeare Key, unlocking the Treasures of his Style ...(1879), and in an edition of Shakespeare for Messrs Cassell, which was issued in weekly parts, and completed in 1868. It was reissued in 1886 asCassell’s Illustrated Shakespeare. Charles Clarke died on the 13th of March 1877 at Genoa, and his wife survived him until the 12th of January 1898. Among Mrs Cowden Clarke’s other works may be mentionedThe Girlhood of Shakespeare’s Heroines(3 vols., 1850-1852), and a translation of Berlioz’sTreatise upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration(1856).
SeeRecollections of Writers(1898), a joint work by the Clarkes containing letters and reminiscences of their many literary friends; and Mary Cowden Clarke’s autobiography,My Long Life(1896). A charming series of letters (1850-1861), addressed by her to an American admirer of her work, Robert Balmanno, was edited by Anne Upton Nettleton asLetters to an Enthusiast(Chicago, 1902).
SeeRecollections of Writers(1898), a joint work by the Clarkes containing letters and reminiscences of their many literary friends; and Mary Cowden Clarke’s autobiography,My Long Life(1896). A charming series of letters (1850-1861), addressed by her to an American admirer of her work, Robert Balmanno, was edited by Anne Upton Nettleton asLetters to an Enthusiast(Chicago, 1902).
CLARKE, EDWARD DANIEL(1769-1822), English mineralogist and traveller, was born at Willingdon, Sussex, on the 5th of June 1769, and educated first at Tonbridge. In 1786 he obtained the office of chapel clerk at Jesus College, Cambridge, but the loss of his father at this time involved him in difficulties. In 1790 he took his degree, and soon after became private tutor to Henry Tufton, nephew of the duke of Dorset. In 1792 he obtained an engagement to travel with Lord Berwick through Germany, Switzerland and Italy. After crossing the Alps, and visiting a few of the principal cities of Italy, including Rome, he went to Naples, where he remained nearly two years. Having returned to England in the summer of 1794, he became tutor in several distinguished families. In 1799 he set out with a Mr Cripps on a tour through the continent of Europe, beginning with Norway and Sweden, whence they proceeded through Russia and the Crimea to Constantinople, Rhodes, and afterwards to Egypt and Palestine. After the capitulation of Alexandria, Clarke was of considerable use in securing for England the statues, sarcophagi, maps, manuscripts, &c., which had been collected by the French savants. Greece was the country next visited. From Athens the travellers proceeded by land to Constantinople, and after a short stay in that city directed their course homewards through Rumelia, Austria, Germany and France. Clarke, who had now obtained considerable reputation, took up his residence at Cambridge. He received the degree of LL.D. shortly after his return in 1803, on account of the valuable donations, including a colossal statue of the Eleusinian Ceres, which he had made to the university. He was also presented to the college living of Harlton, near Cambridge, in 1805, to which, four years later, his father-in-law added that of Yeldham. Towards the end of 1808 Dr Clarke was appointed to the professorship of mineralogy in Cambridge, then first instituted. Nor was his perseverance as a traveller otherwise unrewarded. The MSS. which he had collected in the course of his travels were sold to the Bodleian library for £1000; and by the publication of his travels he realized altogether a clear profit of £6595. Besides lecturing on mineralogy and discharging his clerical duties, Dr Clarke eagerly prosecuted the study of chemistry, and made several discoveries, principally by means of the gas blow-pipe, which he had brought to a high degree of perfection. He was also appointed university librarian in 1817, and was one of the founders of the Cambridge Philosophical Society in 1819. He died in London on the 9th of March 1822. The following is a list of his principal works:—Testimony of Authors respecting the Colossal Statue of Ceres in the Public Library, Cambridge(8vo, 1801-1803);The Tomb of Alexander, a Dissertation on the Sarcophagus brought from Alexandria, and now in the British Museum(4to, 1805);A Methodical Distribution of the Mineral Kingdom(fol., Lewes, 1807);A Description of the Greek Marbles brought from the Shores of the Euxine, Archipelago and Mediterranean, and deposited in the University Library, Cambridge(8vo, 1809);Travels in various Countries of Europe, Asia and Africa(4to, 1810-1819; 2nd ed., 1811-1823).