Chapter 3

He wroteMemoiren(Leipzig, 1850);Der Nationalkrieg in Ungarn, &c. (Leipzig, 1851); a history of the Crimean War,Der Krieg im Orient ... bis Ende Juli 1855(Geneva, 1855); andAus meinen Erinnerungen(translated from the Hungarian, Zürich, 1887).

He wroteMemoiren(Leipzig, 1850);Der Nationalkrieg in Ungarn, &c. (Leipzig, 1851); a history of the Crimean War,Der Krieg im Orient ... bis Ende Juli 1855(Geneva, 1855); andAus meinen Erinnerungen(translated from the Hungarian, Zürich, 1887).

KLAPROTH, HEINRICH JULIUS(1783-1835), German Orientalist and traveller, was born in Berlin on the 11th of October 1783, the son of the chemist Martin Heinrich Klaproth (q.v.). He devoted his energies in quite early life to the study of Asiatic languages, and published in 1802 hisAsiatisches Magazin(Weimar, 1802-1803). He was in consequence called to St Petersburg and given an appointment in the academy there. In 1805 he was a member of Count Golovkin’s embassy to China. On his return he was despatched by the academy to the Caucasus on an ethnographical and linguistic exploration (1807-1808), and was afterwards employed for several years in connexion with the academy’s Oriental publications. In 1812 he moved to Berlin; but in 1815 he settled in Paris, and in 1816 Humboldt procured him from the king of Prussia the title and salary of professor of Asiatic languages and literature, with permission to remain in Paris as long as was requisite for the publication of his works. He died in that city on the 28th of August 1835.

The principal feature of Klaproth’s erudition was the vastness of the field which it embraced. His great workAsia polyglotta(Paris, 1823 and 1831, withSprachatlas) not only served as arésuméof all that was known on the subject, but formed a new departure for the classification of the Eastern languages, more especially those of the Russian Empire. To a great extent, however, his work is now superseded. TheItinerary of a Chinese Traveller(1821), a series of documents in the military archives of St Petersburg purporting to be the travels of George Ludwig von ——, and a similar series obtained from him in the London foreign office, are all regarded as spurious.Klaproth’s other works include:Reise in den Kaukasus und Georgien in den Jahren 1807 und 1808(Halle, 1812-1814; French translation, Paris, 1823);Geographisch-historische Beschreibung des östlichen Kaukasus(Weimar, 1814);Tableaux historiques de l’Asie(Paris, 1826);Mémoires relatifs à l’Asie(Paris, 1824-1828);Tableau historique, geographique, ethnographique et politique de Caucase(Paris, 1827); andVocabulaire et grammaire de la langue géorgienne(Paris, 1827).

The principal feature of Klaproth’s erudition was the vastness of the field which it embraced. His great workAsia polyglotta(Paris, 1823 and 1831, withSprachatlas) not only served as arésuméof all that was known on the subject, but formed a new departure for the classification of the Eastern languages, more especially those of the Russian Empire. To a great extent, however, his work is now superseded. TheItinerary of a Chinese Traveller(1821), a series of documents in the military archives of St Petersburg purporting to be the travels of George Ludwig von ——, and a similar series obtained from him in the London foreign office, are all regarded as spurious.

Klaproth’s other works include:Reise in den Kaukasus und Georgien in den Jahren 1807 und 1808(Halle, 1812-1814; French translation, Paris, 1823);Geographisch-historische Beschreibung des östlichen Kaukasus(Weimar, 1814);Tableaux historiques de l’Asie(Paris, 1826);Mémoires relatifs à l’Asie(Paris, 1824-1828);Tableau historique, geographique, ethnographique et politique de Caucase(Paris, 1827); andVocabulaire et grammaire de la langue géorgienne(Paris, 1827).

KLAPROTH, MARTIN HEINRICH(1743-1817), German chemist, was born at Wernigerode on the 1st of December 1743. During a large portion of his life he followed the profession of an apothecary. After acting as assistant in pharmacies at Quedlinburg, Hanover, Berlin and Danzig successively he came to Berlin on the death of Valentin Rose the elder in 1771 as manager of his business, and in 1780 he started an establishment on his own account in the same city, where from 1782 he was pharmaceutical assessor of the Ober-Collegium Medicum. In 1787 he was appointed lecturer in chemistry to the Royal Artillery, and when the university was founded in 1810 he was selected to be the professor of chemistry. He died in Berlin on the 1st of January 1817. Klaproth was the leading chemist of his time in Germany.An exact and conscientious worker, he did much to improve and systematize the processes of analytical chemistry and mineralogy, and his appreciation of the value of quantitative methods led him to become one of the earliest adherents of the Lavoisierian doctrines outside France. He was the first to discover uranium, zirconium and titanium, and to characterize them as distinct elements, though he did not obtain any of them in the pure metallic state; and he elucidated the composition of numerous substances till then imperfectly known, including compounds of the then newly recognized elements: tellurium, strontium, cerium and chromium.

His papers, over 200 in number, were collected by himself inBeiträge zur chemischen Kenntniss der Mineralkörper(5 vols., 1795-1810) andChemische Abhandlungen gemischten Inhalts(1815). He also published aChemisches Wörterbuch(1807-1810), and edited a revised edition of F. A. C. Gren’sHandbuch der Chemie(1806).

His papers, over 200 in number, were collected by himself inBeiträge zur chemischen Kenntniss der Mineralkörper(5 vols., 1795-1810) andChemische Abhandlungen gemischten Inhalts(1815). He also published aChemisches Wörterbuch(1807-1810), and edited a revised edition of F. A. C. Gren’sHandbuch der Chemie(1806).

KLÉBER, JEAN BAPTISTE(1753-1800), French general, was born on the 9th of March 1753, at Strassburg, where his father was a builder. He was trained, partly at Paris, for the profession of architect, but his opportune assistance to two German nobles in a tavern brawl obtained for him a nomination to the military school of Munich. Thence he obtained a commission in the Austrian army, but resigned it in 1783 on finding his humble birth in the way of his promotion. On returning to France he was appointed inspector of public buildings at Belfort, where he studied fortification and military science. In 1792 he enlisted in the Haut-Rhin volunteers, and was from his military knowledge at once elected adjutant and soon afterwards lieutenant-colonel. At the defence of Mainz he so distinguished himself that though disgraced along with the rest of the garrison and imprisoned, he was promptly reinstated, and in August 1793 promoted general of brigade. He won considerable distinction in the Vendéan war, and two months later was made a general of division. In these operations began his intimacy with Marceau, with whom he defeated the Royalists at Le Mans and Savenay. For openly expressing his opinion that lenient measures ought to be pursued towards the Vendéans he was recalled; but in April 1794 he was once more reinstated and sent to the Army of the Sambre-and-Meuse. He displayed his skill and bravery in the numerous actions around Charleroi, and especially in the crowning victory of Fleurus, after which in the winter of 1794-95 he besieged Mainz. In 1795 and again in 1796 he held the chief command of an army temporarily, but declined a permanent appointment as commander-in-chief. On the 13th of October 1795 he fought a brilliant rearguard action at the bridge of Neuwied, and in the offensive campaign of 1796 he was Jourdan’s most active and successful lieutenant. Having, after the retreat to the Rhine (seeFrench Revolutionary Wars), declined the chief command, he withdrew into private life early in 1798. He accepted a division in the expedition to Egypt under Bonaparte, but was wounded in the head at Alexandria in the first engagement, which prevented his taking any further part in the campaign of the Pyramids, and caused him to be appointed governor of Alexandria. In the Syrian campaign of 1799, however, he commanded the vanguard, took El-Arish, Gaza and Jaffa, and won the great victory of Mount Tabor on the 15th of April 1799. When Napoleon returned to France towards the end of 1799 he left Kléber in command of the French forces. In this capacity, seeing no hope of bringing his army back to France or of consolidating his conquests, he made the convention of El-Arish. But when Lord Keith, the British admiral, refused to ratify the terms, he attacked the Turks at Heliopolis, though with but 10,000 men against 60,000, and utterly defeated them on the 20th of March 1800. He then retook Cairo, which had revolted from the French. Shortly after these victories he was assassinated at Cairo by a fanatic on the 14th of June 1800, the same day on which his friend and comrade Desaix fell at Marengo. Kléber was undoubtedly one of the greatest generals of the French revolutionary epoch. Though he distrusted his powers and declined the responsibility of supreme command, there is nothing in his career to show that he would have been unequal to it. As a second in command he was not excelled by any general of his time. His conduct of affairs in Egypt at a time when the treasury was empty and the troops were discontented for want of pay, shows that his powers as an administrator were little—if at all—inferior to those he possessed as a general.

Ernouf, the grandson of Jourdan’s chief of staff, published in 1867 a valuable biography of Kléber. See also Reynaud,Life of Merlin de Thionville; Ney, Memoirs; Dumas,Souvenirs; Las Casas,Memorial de Ste Hélène; J. Charavaray,Les Généraux morts pour la patrie; General Pajol,Kléber; lives of Marceau and Desaix; M. F. Rousseau,Kléber et Menou en Egypte(Paris, 1900).

Ernouf, the grandson of Jourdan’s chief of staff, published in 1867 a valuable biography of Kléber. See also Reynaud,Life of Merlin de Thionville; Ney, Memoirs; Dumas,Souvenirs; Las Casas,Memorial de Ste Hélène; J. Charavaray,Les Généraux morts pour la patrie; General Pajol,Kléber; lives of Marceau and Desaix; M. F. Rousseau,Kléber et Menou en Egypte(Paris, 1900).

KLEIN, JULIUS LEOPOLD(1810-1876), German writer of Jewish origin, was born at Miskolcz, in Hungary. He was educated at the gymnasium in Pest, and studied medicine in Vienna and Berlin. After travelling in Italy and Greece, he settled as a man of letters in Berlin, where he remained until his death on the 2nd of August 1876. He was the author of many dramatic works, among others the historical tragediesMaria von Medici(1841);Luines(1842);Zenobia(1847);Moreto(1859);Maria(1860);Strafford(1862) andHeliodora(1867); and the comediesDie Herzogin(1848);Ein Schützling(1850); andVoltaire(1862). The tendency of Klein as a dramatist was to become bombastic and obscure, but many of his characters are vigorously conceived, and in nearly all his tragedies there are passages of brilliant rhetoric. He is chiefly known as the author of the elaborate though uncompletedGeschichte des Dramas(1865-1876), in which he undertook to record the history of the drama from the earliest times. He died when about to enter upon the Elizabethan period, to the treatment of which he had looked forward as the chief part of his task. The work, which is in thirteen bulky volumes, gives proof of immense learning, but is marred by eccentricities of style and judgment.

Klein’sDramatische Werkewere collected in 7 vols. (1871-1872).

Klein’sDramatische Werkewere collected in 7 vols. (1871-1872).

KLEIST, BERND HEINRICH WILHELM VON(1777-1811), German poet, dramatist and novelist, was born at Frankfort-on-Oder on the 18th of October 1777. After a scanty education, he entered the Prussian army in 1792, served in the Rhine campaign of 1796 and retired from the service in 1799 with the rank of lieutenant. He next studied law and philosophy at the university of Frankfort-on-Oder, and in 1800 received a subordinate post in the ministry of finance at Berlin. In the following year his roving, restless spirit got the better of him, and procuring a lengthened leave of absence he visited Paris and then settled in Switzerland. Here he found congenial friends in Heinrich Zschokke (q.v.) and Ludwig Friedrich August Wieland (1777-1819), son of the poet; and to them he read his first drama, a gloomy tragedy,Die Familie Schroffenstein(1803), originally entitledDie Familie Ghonorez. In the autumn of 1802 Kleist returned to Germany; he visited Goethe, Schiller and Wieland in Weimar, stayed for a while in Leipzig and Dresden, again proceeded to Paris, and returning in 1804 to his post in Berlin was transferred to theDomänenkammer(department for the administration of crown lands) at Königsberg. On a journey to Dresden in 1807 Kleist was arrested by the French as a spy, and being sent to France was kept for six months a close prisoner at Châlons-sur-Marne. On regaining his liberty he proceeded to Dresden, where in conjunction with Adam Heinrich Müller (1779-1829) he published in 1808 the journalPhöbus. In 1809 he went to Prague, and ultimately settled in Berlin, where he edited (1810-1811) theBerliner Abendblätter. Captivated by the intellectual and musical accomplishments of a certain Frau Henriette Vogel, Kleist, who was himself more disheartened and embittered than ever, agreed to do her bidding and die with her, carrying out this resolution by first shooting the lady and then himself on the shore of the Wannsee near Potsdam, on the 21st of November 1811. Kleist’s whole life was filled by a restless striving after ideal and illusory happiness, and this is largely reflected in his work. He was by far the most important North German dramatist of the Romantic movement, and no other of the Romanticists approaches him in the energy with which he expresses patriotic indignation.

His first tragedy,Die Familie Schroffenstein, has been already referred to; the material for the second,Penthesilea(1808), queen of the Amazons, is taken from a Greek source and presents a picture of wild passion. More successful than either of these was his romantic play,Das Käthchen von Heilbronn, oder Die Feuerprobe(1808), a poetic drama full of medieval bustle and mystery, which has retained its popularity. In comedy, Kleist made a name withDer zerbrochene Krug(1811), whileAmphitryon(1808), an adaptation of Molière’s comedy, is of less importance. Of Kleist’s other dramas,Die Hermannschlacht(1809) is a dramatic treatment of an historical subject and is full of references to the political conditions of his own times. In it he gives vent to his hatred of his country’s oppressors. This, together with the dramaPrinz Friedrich von Homburg, the latter accounted Kleist’s best work, was first published by Ludwig Tieck inKleists hinterlassene Schriften(1821).Robert Guiskard, a drama conceived on a grand plan, was left a fragment. Kleist was also a master in the art of narrative, and of hisGesammelte Erzählungen(1810-1811),Michael Kohlhaas, in which the famous Brandenburg horse dealer in Luther’s day (seeKohlhase) is immortalized, is one of the best German stories of its time. He also wrote some patriotic lyrics. HisGesammelte Schriftenwere published by Ludwig Tieck (3 vols. 1826) and by Julian Schmidt (new ed. 1874); also by F. Muncker (4 vols. 1882); by T. Zolling (4 vols. 1885); by K. Siegen, (4 vols. 1895); and in a critical edition by E. Schmidt (5 vols. 1904-1905). HisAusgewählte Dramenwere published by K. Siegen (Leipzig, 1877); and his letters were first published by E. von Bülow,Heinrich von Kleists Leben und Briefe(1848).See further A. Wilbrandt,Heinrich von Kleist(1863); O. Brahm,Heinrich von Kleist(1884); R. Bonafous,Henri de Kleist, sa vie et ses œuvres(1894); H. Conrad,Heinrich von Kleist als Mensch und Dichter(1896); G. Minde-Pouet,Heinrich von Kleist, seine Sprache und sein Stil(1897); R. Steig,Heinrich von Kleists Berliner Kämpfe(1901); F. Servaes,Heinrich von Kleist(1902); S. Wukadinowic,Kleist-Studien(1904); S. Rahmer,H. von Kleist als Mensch und Dichter(1909).

His first tragedy,Die Familie Schroffenstein, has been already referred to; the material for the second,Penthesilea(1808), queen of the Amazons, is taken from a Greek source and presents a picture of wild passion. More successful than either of these was his romantic play,Das Käthchen von Heilbronn, oder Die Feuerprobe(1808), a poetic drama full of medieval bustle and mystery, which has retained its popularity. In comedy, Kleist made a name withDer zerbrochene Krug(1811), whileAmphitryon(1808), an adaptation of Molière’s comedy, is of less importance. Of Kleist’s other dramas,Die Hermannschlacht(1809) is a dramatic treatment of an historical subject and is full of references to the political conditions of his own times. In it he gives vent to his hatred of his country’s oppressors. This, together with the dramaPrinz Friedrich von Homburg, the latter accounted Kleist’s best work, was first published by Ludwig Tieck inKleists hinterlassene Schriften(1821).Robert Guiskard, a drama conceived on a grand plan, was left a fragment. Kleist was also a master in the art of narrative, and of hisGesammelte Erzählungen(1810-1811),Michael Kohlhaas, in which the famous Brandenburg horse dealer in Luther’s day (seeKohlhase) is immortalized, is one of the best German stories of its time. He also wrote some patriotic lyrics. HisGesammelte Schriftenwere published by Ludwig Tieck (3 vols. 1826) and by Julian Schmidt (new ed. 1874); also by F. Muncker (4 vols. 1882); by T. Zolling (4 vols. 1885); by K. Siegen, (4 vols. 1895); and in a critical edition by E. Schmidt (5 vols. 1904-1905). HisAusgewählte Dramenwere published by K. Siegen (Leipzig, 1877); and his letters were first published by E. von Bülow,Heinrich von Kleists Leben und Briefe(1848).

See further A. Wilbrandt,Heinrich von Kleist(1863); O. Brahm,Heinrich von Kleist(1884); R. Bonafous,Henri de Kleist, sa vie et ses œuvres(1894); H. Conrad,Heinrich von Kleist als Mensch und Dichter(1896); G. Minde-Pouet,Heinrich von Kleist, seine Sprache und sein Stil(1897); R. Steig,Heinrich von Kleists Berliner Kämpfe(1901); F. Servaes,Heinrich von Kleist(1902); S. Wukadinowic,Kleist-Studien(1904); S. Rahmer,H. von Kleist als Mensch und Dichter(1909).

KLEIST, EWALD CHRISTIAN VON(1715-1759), German poet, was born at Zeblin, near Köslin in Pomerania, on the 7th of March 1715. After attending the Jesuit school in Deutschkrona and the gymnasium in Danzig, he proceeded in 1731 to the university of Königsberg, where he studied law and mathematics. On the completion of his studies, he entered the Danish army, in which he became an officer in 1736. Recalled to Prussia by Frederick II. in 1740, he was appointed lieutenant in a regiment stationed at Potsdam, where he became acquainted with J. W. L. Gleim (q.v.), who interested him in poetry. After distinguishing himself at the battle of Mollwitz (April 10, 1741) and the siege of Neisse (1741), he was promoted captain in 1749 and major in 1756. Quartered during the winter of 1757-1758 in Leipzig, he found relief from his irksome military duties in the society of Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (q.v.). Shortly afterwards in the battle of Kunersdorf, on the 12th of August 1759, he was mortally wounded while leading the attack, and died at Frankfort-on-Oder on the 24th of August following.

Kleist’s chief work is a poem in hexameters,Der Frühling(1749), for which Thomson’sSeasonslargely supplied ideas. In his description of the beauties of nature Kleist shows real poetical genius, an almost modern sentiment and fine taste. He also wrote some charming odes, idylls and elegies, and a small epic poemCissides und Paches(1759), the subject being two Thessalian friends who die an heroic death for their country in a battle against the Athenians.

Kleist published in 1756 the first collection of hisGedichte, which was followed by a second in 1758. After his death his friend Karl Wilhelm Ramler (q.v.) published an edition ofKleists sämtliche Werkein 2 vols. (1760). A critical edition was published by A. Sauer, in 3 vols. (1880-1882). Cf. further, A. Chuquet,De Ewaldi Kleistii vita et scriptis(Paris, 1887), and H. Pröhle,Friedrich der Grosse und die deutsche Literatur(1872).

Kleist published in 1756 the first collection of hisGedichte, which was followed by a second in 1758. After his death his friend Karl Wilhelm Ramler (q.v.) published an edition ofKleists sämtliche Werkein 2 vols. (1760). A critical edition was published by A. Sauer, in 3 vols. (1880-1882). Cf. further, A. Chuquet,De Ewaldi Kleistii vita et scriptis(Paris, 1887), and H. Pröhle,Friedrich der Grosse und die deutsche Literatur(1872).

KLERKSDORP,a town of the Transvaal, 118 m. S.W. of Johannesburg and 192 m. N.E. of Kimberley by rail. Pop. (1904), 4276 of whom 2203 were whites. The town, built on the banks of the Schoonspruit 10 m. above its junction with the Vaal, possesses several fine public buildings. In the neighbourhood are gold-mines, the reef appearing to form the western boundary of the Witwatersrand basin. Diamonds (green in colour) and coal are also found in the district. Klerksdorp was one of the villages founded by the first Boers who crossed the Vaal, dating from 1838. The modern town, which is on the side of thespruitopposite the old village, was founded in 1888.

KLESL(orKhlesl),MELCHIOR(1552-1630), Austrian statesman and ecclesiastic, was the son of a Protestant baker, and was born in Vienna. Under the influence of the Jesuits he was converted to Roman Catholicism, and having finished his education at the universities of Vienna and Ingolstadt, he was made chancellor of the university of Vienna; and as official and vicar-general of the bishop of Passau he exhibited the zeal of a convert in forwarding the progress of the counter-reformation in Austria. He became bishop of Vienna in 1598; but more important was his association with the archduke Matthias which began about the same time. Both before and after 1612, when Matthias succeeded his brother Rudolph II. as emperor, Klesl was the originator and director of his policy, although he stoutly opposed the concessions to the Hungarian Protestants in 1606. He assisted to secure the election of Matthias to the imperial throne, and sought, but without success, to strengthen the new emperor’s position by making peace between the Catholics and the Protestants. When during the short reign of Matthias the question of the imperial succession demanded prompt attention, the bishop, although quite as anxious as his opponents to retain the empire in the house of Habsburg and to preserve the dominance of the Roman Catholic Church, advised that this question should be shelved until some arrangement with the Protestant princes had been reached. This counsel was displeasing to the archduke Maximilian and to Ferdinand, afterwards the emperor Ferdinand II. who believed that Klesl was hostile to the candidature of the latter prince. It was, however, impossible to shake his influence with the emperor; and in June 1618, a few months before the death of Matthias, he was seized by order of the archdukes and imprisoned at Ambras in Tirol. In 1622 Klesl, who had been a cardinal since 1615, was transferred to Rome by order of Pope Gregory XV., and was released from imprisonment. In 1627 Ferdinand II. allowed him to return to his episcopal duties in Vienna, where he died on the 18th of September 1630.

See J. Freiherr von Hammer-Purgstall,Khlesls Leben(Vienna, 1847-1851); A. Kerschbaumer,Kardinal Klesl(Vienna, 1865); andKlesls Briefe an Rudolfs II. Obersthofmeister A. Freiherr von Dietrichstein, edited by V. Bibl. (Vienna, 1900).

See J. Freiherr von Hammer-Purgstall,Khlesls Leben(Vienna, 1847-1851); A. Kerschbaumer,Kardinal Klesl(Vienna, 1865); andKlesls Briefe an Rudolfs II. Obersthofmeister A. Freiherr von Dietrichstein, edited by V. Bibl. (Vienna, 1900).

KLINGER, FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN VON(1752-1831), German dramatist and novelist, was born of humble parentage at Frankfort-on-Main, on the 17th of February 1752. His father died when he was a child, and his early years were a hard struggle. He was enabled, however, in 1774 to enter the university of Giessen, where he studied law; and Goethe, with whom he had been acquainted since childhood, helped him in many ways. In 1775 Klinger gained with his tragedyDie Zwillingea prize offered by the Hamburg theatre, under the auspices of the actress Sophie Charlotte Ackermann (1714-1792) and her son the famous actor and playwright, Friedrich Ludwig Schröder (1744-1816). In 1776 Klinger was appointedTheaterdichterto the “Seylersche Schauspiel-Gesellschaft” and held this post for two years. In 1778 he entered the Austrian military service and took part in the Bavarian war of succession. In 1780 he went to St Petersburg, became an officer in the Russian army, was ennobled and attached to the Grand Duke Paul, whom he accompanied on a journey to Italy and France. In 1785 he was appointed director of the corps of cadets, and having married a natural daughter of the empress Catharine, was made praeses of the Academy of Knights in 1799. In 1803 Klinger was nominated by the emperor Alexander curator of the university of Dorpat, an office he held until 1817; in 1811 he became lieutenant-general. He then gradually gave up his official posts, and after living for many years in honourable retirement, died at Dorpat on the 25th of February 1831.

Klinger was a man of vigorous moral character and full of fine feeling, though the bitter experiences and deprivations of his youth are largely reflected in his dramas. It was one of his earliest works,Sturm und Drang(1776), which gave its name to this literary epoch. In addition to this tragedy andDie Zwillinge(1776), the chief plays of his early period of passionate fervour and restless “storm and stress” areDie neue Arria(1776),Simsone Grisaldo(1776) andStilpo und seine Kinder(1780). Toa later period belongs the fine double tragedy ofMedea in KorinthandMedea auf dem Kaukasos(1791). In Russia he devoted himself mainly to the writing of philosophical romances, of which the best known areFausts Leben, Taten und Höllenfahrt(1791),Geschichte Giafars des Barmeciden(1792) andGeschichte Raphaels de Aquillas(1793). This series was closed in 1803 withBetrachtungen und Gedanken über verschiedene Gegenstände der Welt und der Literatur. In these works Klinger gives calm and dignified expression to the leading ideas which the period ofSturm und Dranghad bequeathed to German classical literature.

Klinger’s works were published in twelve volumes (1809-1815), also 1832-1833 and 1842. The most recent edition is in eight volumes (1878-1880); but none of these is complete. A selection will be found in A. Sauer,Stürmer und Dränger, vol. i. (1883). See E. Schmidt,Lenz und Klinger(1878); M. Rieger,Klinger in der Sturm- und Drangperiode(1880); andKlinger in seiner Reife(1896).

Klinger’s works were published in twelve volumes (1809-1815), also 1832-1833 and 1842. The most recent edition is in eight volumes (1878-1880); but none of these is complete. A selection will be found in A. Sauer,Stürmer und Dränger, vol. i. (1883). See E. Schmidt,Lenz und Klinger(1878); M. Rieger,Klinger in der Sturm- und Drangperiode(1880); andKlinger in seiner Reife(1896).

KLINGER, MAX(1857-  ), German painter, etcher and sculptor, was born at Plagwitz near Leipzig. He attended the classes at the Carlsruhe art school in 1874, and went in the following year to Berlin, where in 1878 he created a sensation at the Academy exhibition with two series of pen-and-ink drawings—the “Series upon the Theme of Christ” and “Fantasies upon the Finding of a Glove.” The daring originality of these imaginative and eccentric works caused an outburst of indignation, and the artist was voted insane; nevertheless the “Glove” series was bought by the Berlin National Gallery. His painting of “The Judgment of Paris” caused a similar storm of indignant protest in 1887, owing to its rejection of all conventional attributes and the naïve directness of the conception. His vivid and somewhat morbid imagination, with its leaning towards the gruesome and disagreeable, and the Goyaesque turn of his mind, found their best expression in his “cycles” of etchings: “Deliverances of Sacrificial Victims told in Ovid,” “A Brahms Phantasy,” “Eve and the Future,” “A Life,” and “Of Death”; but in his use of the needle he does not aim at the technical excellence of the great masters; it supplies him merely with means of expressing his ideas. After 1886 Klinger devoted himself more exclusively to painting and sculpture. In his painting he aims neither at classic beauty nor modern truth, but at grim impressiveness not without a touch of mysticism. His “Pietà” at the Dresden Gallery, the frescoes at the Leipzig University, and the “Christ in Olympus,” at the Modern Gallery in Vienna, are characteristic examples of his art. The Leipzig Museum contains his sculptured “Salome” and “Cassandra.” In sculpture he favours the use of varicoloured materials in the manner of the Greek chryselephantine sculpture. His “Beethoven” is a notable instance of his work in this direction.

KLIPSPRINGER,the Boer name of a small African mountain-antelope (Oreotragus saltator), ranging from the Cape through East Africa to Somaliland and Abyssinia, and characterized by its blunt rounded hoofs, thick pithy hair and gold-spangled colouring. The klipspringer represents a genus by itself, the various local forms not being worthy of more than racial distinction. The activity of these antelopes is marvellous.

KLONDIKE,a district in Yukon Territory, north-western Canada, approximately in 64° N. and 140° W. The limits are rather indefinite, but the district includes the country to the south of the Klondike River, which comes into the Yukon from the east and has several tributaries, as well as Indian River, a second branch of the Yukon, flowing into it some distance above the Klondike. The richer gold-bearing gravels are found along the creeks tributary to these two rivers within an area of about 800 sq. m. The Klondike district is a dissected peneplain with low ridges of rounded forms rising to 4250 ft. above the sea at the Dome which forms its centre. All of the gold-bearing creeks rise not far from the Dome and radiate in various directions toward the Klondike and Indian rivers, the most productive being Bonanza with its tributary Eldorado, Hunker, Dominion and Gold Run. Of these, Eldorado, for the two or three miles in which it was gold-bearing, was much the richest, and for its length probably surpassed any other known placer deposit. Rich gravel was discovered on Bonanza Creek in 1896, and a wild rush to this almost inaccessible region followed, a population of 30,000 coming in within the next three or four years with a rapidly increasing output of gold, reaching in 1900 the climax of $22,000,000. Since then the production has steadily declined, until in 1906 it fell to $5,600,000. The richest gravels were worked out before 1910, and most of the population had left the Klondike for Alaska and other regions; so that Dawson, which for a time was a bustling city of more than 10,000, dwindled to about 3000 inhabitants. As the ground was almost all frozen, the mines were worked by a thawing process, first by setting fires, afterwards by using steam, new methods being introduced to meet the unusual conditions. Later dredges and hydraulic mining were resorted to with success.

The Klondike, in spite of its isolated position, brought together miners and adventurers from all parts of the world, and it is greatly to the credit of the Canadian government and of the mounted police, who were entrusted with the keeping of order, that life and property were as safe as elsewhere and that no lawless methods were adopted by the miners as in placer mining camps in the western United States. The region was at first difficult of access, but can now be reached with perfect comfort in summer, travelling by well-appointed steamers on the Pacific and the Yukon River. Owing to its perpetually frozen soil, summer roads were excessively bad in earlier days, but good wagon roads have since been constructed to all the important mining centres. Dawson itself has all the resources of a civilized city in spite of being founded on a frozen peat-bog; and is supplied with ordinary market vegetables from farms just across the river. During the winter, when for some time the sun does not appear above the hills, the cold is intense, though usually without wind, but the well-chinked log houses can be kept comfortably warm. When winter travel is necessary dog teams and sledges are generally made use of, except on the stage route south to White Horse, where horses are used. A telegraph line connects Dawson with British Columbia, but the difficulties in keeping it in order are so great over the long intervening wilderness that communication is often broken. Gold ispracticallythe only economic product of the Klondike, though small amounts of tin ore occur, and lignite coal has been mined lower down on the Yukon. The source of the gold seems to have been small stringers of quartz in the siliceous and sericitic schists which form the bed rock of much of the region, and no important quartz veins have been discovered; so that unlike most other placer regions the Klondike has not developed lode mines to continue the production of gold when the gravels are exhausted.

KLOPP, ONNO(1822-1903), German historian, was born at Leer on the 9th of October 1822, and was educated at the universities of Bonn, Berlin and Göttingen. For a few years he was a teacher at Leer and at Osnabrück; but in 1858 he settled at Hanover, where he became intimate with King George V., who made him hisArchivrat. Thoroughly disliking Prussia, he was in hearty accord with George in resisting her aggressive policy; and after the annexation of Hanover in 1866 he accompanied the exiled king to Hietzing. He became a Roman Catholic in 1874. He died at Penzing, near Vienna, on the 9th of August 1903. Klopp is best known as the author ofDer Fall des Hauses Stuart(Vienna, 1875-1888), the fullest existing account of the later Stuarts.

HisDer König Friedrich II. und seine Politik(Schaffhausen, 1867) andGeschichte Ostfrieslands(Hanover, 1854-1858) show his dislike of Prussia. His other works includeDer dreissigjährige Krieg bis zum Tode Gustav Adolfs(Paderborn, 1891-1896); a revised edition of hisTilly im dreissigjährigen Kriege(Stuttgart, 1861); a life of George V.,König Georg V.(Hanover, 1878);Phillipp Melanchthon(Berlin, 1897). He editedCorrispondenza epistolare tra Leopoldo I. imperatore ed il P. Marco l’Aviano capuccino(Gratz, 1888). Klopp also wrote much in defence of George V. and his claim to Hanover, including theOffizieller Bericht über die Kriegsereignisse zwischen Hannover und Preussen im Juni 1866(Vienna, 1867), and he edited the works of Leibnitz in eleven volumes (1861-1884).See W. Klopp,Onno Klopp: ein Lebenslauf(Wehberg, 1907).

HisDer König Friedrich II. und seine Politik(Schaffhausen, 1867) andGeschichte Ostfrieslands(Hanover, 1854-1858) show his dislike of Prussia. His other works includeDer dreissigjährige Krieg bis zum Tode Gustav Adolfs(Paderborn, 1891-1896); a revised edition of hisTilly im dreissigjährigen Kriege(Stuttgart, 1861); a life of George V.,König Georg V.(Hanover, 1878);Phillipp Melanchthon(Berlin, 1897). He editedCorrispondenza epistolare tra Leopoldo I. imperatore ed il P. Marco l’Aviano capuccino(Gratz, 1888). Klopp also wrote much in defence of George V. and his claim to Hanover, including theOffizieller Bericht über die Kriegsereignisse zwischen Hannover und Preussen im Juni 1866(Vienna, 1867), and he edited the works of Leibnitz in eleven volumes (1861-1884).

See W. Klopp,Onno Klopp: ein Lebenslauf(Wehberg, 1907).

KLOPSTOCK, GOTTLIEB FRIEDRICH(1724-1803), German poet, was born at Quedlinburg, on the 2nd of July 1724, the eldestson of a lawyer, a man of sterling character and of a deeply religious mind. Both in his birthplace and on the estate of Friedeburg on the Saale, which his father later rented, young Klopstock passed a happy childhood; and more attention having been given to his physical than to his mental development he grew up a strong healthy boy and was an excellent horseman and skater. In his thirteenth year Klopstock returned to Quedlinburg where he attended the gymnasium, and in 1739 proceeded to the famous classical school of Schulpforta. Here he soon became an adept in Greek and Latin versification, and wrote some meritorious idylls and odes in German. His original intention of making the emperor Henry I. (“The Fowler”) the hero of an epic, was, under the influence of Milton’sParadise Lost, with which he became acquainted through Bodmer’s translation, abandoned in favour of the religious epic. While yet at school, he had already drafted the plan ofDer Messias, upon which his fame mainly rests. On the 21st of September 1745 he delivered on quitting school a remarkable “leaving oration” on epic poetry—Abschiedsrede über die epische Poesie, kultur- und literargeschichtlich erläutert—and next proceeded to Jena as a student of theology, where he elaborated the first three cantos of theMessiasin prose. The life at this university being uncongenial to him, he removed in the spring of 1746 to Leipzig, and here joined the circle of young men of letters who contributed to theBremer Beiträge. In this periodical the first three cantos of theMessiasin hexameters were anonymously published in 1748. A new era in German literature had commenced, and the name of the author soon became known. In Leipzig he also wrote a number of odes, the best known of which isAn meine Freunde(1747), afterwards recast asWingolf(1767). He left the university in 1748 and became a private tutor in the family of a relative at Langensalza. Here unrequited love for a cousin (the “Fanny” of his odes) disturbed his peace of mind. Gladly therefore he accepted in 1750 an invitation from Jakob Bodmer (q.v.), the translator ofParadise Lost, to visit him in Zürich. Here Klopstock was at first treated with every kindness and respect and rapidly recovered his spirits. Bodmer, however, was disappointed to find in the young poet of theMessiasa man of strong worldly interests, and a coolness sprang up between the two friends.

At this juncture Klopstock received from Frederick V. of Denmark, on the recommendation of his minister Count von Bernstorff (1712-1772), an invitation to settle at Copenhagen, with an annuity of 400 talers, with a view to the completion of theMessias. The offer was accepted; on his way to the Danish capital Klopstock met at Hamburg the lady who in 1754 became his wife, Margareta (Meta) Moller, (the “Cidli” of his odes), an enthusiastic admirer of his poetry. His happiness was short; she died in 1758, leaving him almost broken-hearted. His grief at her loss finds pathetic expression in the 15th canto of theMessias. The poet subsequently published his wife’s writings,Hinterlassene Werke von Margareta Klopstock(1759), which give evidence of a tender, sensitive and deeply religious spirit. Klopstock now relapsed into melancholy; new ideas failed him, and his poetry became more and more vague and unintelligible. He still continued to live and work at Copenhagen, and next, following Heinrich Wilhelm von Gerstenberg (q.v.), turned his attention to northern mythology, which he conceived should replace classical subjects in a new school of German poetry. In 1770, on the dismissal by King Christian VII. of Count Bernstorff from office, he retired with the latter to Hamburg, but retained his pension together with the rank of councillor of legation. Here, in 1773, he issued the last five cantos of theMessias. In the following year he published his strange scheme for the regeneration of German letters,Die Gelehrtenrepublik(1774). In 1775 he travelled south, and making the acquaintance of Goethe on the way, spent a year at the court of the margrave of Baden at Karlsruhe. Thence, in 1776, with the title ofHofratand a pension from the margrave, which he retained together with that from the king of Denmark, he returned to Hamburg where he spent the remainder of his life. His latter years he passed, as had always been his inclination, in retirement, only occasionally relieved by association with his most intimate friends, busied with philological studies, and hardly interesting himself in the new developments of German literature. The American War of Independence and the Revolution in France aroused him, however, to enthusiasm. The French Republic sent him the diploma of honorary citizenship; but, horrified at the terrible scenes the Revolution had enacted in the place of liberty, he returned it. When 67 years of age he contracted a second marriage with Johanna Elisabeth von Winthem, a widow and a niece of his late wife, who for many years had been one of his most intimate friends. He died at Hamburg on the 14th of March 1803, mourned by all Germany, and was buried with great pomp and ceremony by the side of his first wife in the churchyard of the village of Ottensen.

Klopstock’s nature was best attuned to lyrical poetry, and in it his deep, noble character found its truest expression. He was less suited for epic and dramatic representation; for, wrapt up in himself, a stranger to the outer world, without historical culture, and without even any interest in the events of his time, he was lacking in the art of plastic representation such as a great epic requires. Thus theMessias, despite the magnificent passages which especially the earlier cantos contain, cannot satisfy the demands such a theme must necessarily make. The subject matter, the Redemption, presented serious difficulties to adequate epic treatment. The Gospel story was too scanty, and what might have been imported from without and interwoven with it was rejected by the author as profane. He had accordingly to resort to Christian mythology; and here again, circumscribed by the dogmas of the Church, he was in danger of trespassing on the fundamental truths of the Christian faith. The personality of Christ could scarcely be treated in an individual form, still less could angels and devils—and in the case of God Himself it was impossible. The result was that, despite the groundwork—the Gospels, theActs of the Apostles, theRevelation of St John, and the model ready to hand in Milton’sParadise Lost—material elements are largely wanting and the actors in the poem, Divine and human, lack plastic form. That the poem took twenty-five years to complete could not but be detrimental to its unity of design; the original enthusiasm was not sustained until the end, and the earlier cantos are far superior to the later. Thus the intense public interest the work aroused in its commencement had almost vanished before its completion. It was translated into seventeen languages and led to numerous imitations. In his odes Klopstock had more scope for his peculiar talent. Among the best areAn Fanny;Der Zürchersee;Die tote Klarissa;An Cidli;Die beiden Musen;Der Rheinwein;Die frühen Gräber;Mein Vaterland. His religious odes mostly take the form of hymns, of which the most beautiful isDie Frühlingsfeier. His dramas, in some of which, notablyHermanns Schlacht(1769) andHermann und die Fürsten(1784), he celebrated the deeds of the ancient German hero Arminius, and in others,Der Tod Adams(1757) andSalomo(1764), took his materials from the Old Testament, are essentially lyrical in character and deficient in action. In addition toDie Gelehrtenrepublik, he was also the author ofFragmente über Sprache und Dichtkunst(1779) andGrammatische Gespräche(1794), works in which he made important contributions to philology and to the history of German poetry.Klopstock’sWerkefirst appeared in seven quarto volumes (1798-1809). At the same time a more complete edition in twelve octavo volumes was published (1798-1817), to which six additional volumes were added in 1830. More recent editions were published in 1844-1845, 1854-1855, 1879 (ed. by R. Boxberger), 1884 (ed. by R. Hamel) and 1893 (a selection edited by F. Muncker). A critical edition of theOdeswas published by F. Muncker and J. Pawel in 1889; a commentary on these by H. Düntzer (1860; 2nd ed., 1878). For Klopstock’s correspondence see K. Schmidt,Klopstock und seine Freunde(1810); C. A. H. Clodius,Klopstocks Nachlass(1821); J. M. Lappenberg,Briefe von und an Klopstock(1867). Cf. further K. F. Cramer,Klopstock, er und über ihn(1780-1792); J. G. Gruber,Klopstocks Leben(1832); R. Hamel,Klopstock-Studien(1879-1880); F. Muncker,F. G. Klopstock, the most authoritative biography, (1888); E. Bailly,Étude sur la vie et les œuvres de Klopstock(Paris, 1888).

Klopstock’s nature was best attuned to lyrical poetry, and in it his deep, noble character found its truest expression. He was less suited for epic and dramatic representation; for, wrapt up in himself, a stranger to the outer world, without historical culture, and without even any interest in the events of his time, he was lacking in the art of plastic representation such as a great epic requires. Thus theMessias, despite the magnificent passages which especially the earlier cantos contain, cannot satisfy the demands such a theme must necessarily make. The subject matter, the Redemption, presented serious difficulties to adequate epic treatment. The Gospel story was too scanty, and what might have been imported from without and interwoven with it was rejected by the author as profane. He had accordingly to resort to Christian mythology; and here again, circumscribed by the dogmas of the Church, he was in danger of trespassing on the fundamental truths of the Christian faith. The personality of Christ could scarcely be treated in an individual form, still less could angels and devils—and in the case of God Himself it was impossible. The result was that, despite the groundwork—the Gospels, theActs of the Apostles, theRevelation of St John, and the model ready to hand in Milton’sParadise Lost—material elements are largely wanting and the actors in the poem, Divine and human, lack plastic form. That the poem took twenty-five years to complete could not but be detrimental to its unity of design; the original enthusiasm was not sustained until the end, and the earlier cantos are far superior to the later. Thus the intense public interest the work aroused in its commencement had almost vanished before its completion. It was translated into seventeen languages and led to numerous imitations. In his odes Klopstock had more scope for his peculiar talent. Among the best areAn Fanny;Der Zürchersee;Die tote Klarissa;An Cidli;Die beiden Musen;Der Rheinwein;Die frühen Gräber;Mein Vaterland. His religious odes mostly take the form of hymns, of which the most beautiful isDie Frühlingsfeier. His dramas, in some of which, notablyHermanns Schlacht(1769) andHermann und die Fürsten(1784), he celebrated the deeds of the ancient German hero Arminius, and in others,Der Tod Adams(1757) andSalomo(1764), took his materials from the Old Testament, are essentially lyrical in character and deficient in action. In addition toDie Gelehrtenrepublik, he was also the author ofFragmente über Sprache und Dichtkunst(1779) andGrammatische Gespräche(1794), works in which he made important contributions to philology and to the history of German poetry.

Klopstock’sWerkefirst appeared in seven quarto volumes (1798-1809). At the same time a more complete edition in twelve octavo volumes was published (1798-1817), to which six additional volumes were added in 1830. More recent editions were published in 1844-1845, 1854-1855, 1879 (ed. by R. Boxberger), 1884 (ed. by R. Hamel) and 1893 (a selection edited by F. Muncker). A critical edition of theOdeswas published by F. Muncker and J. Pawel in 1889; a commentary on these by H. Düntzer (1860; 2nd ed., 1878). For Klopstock’s correspondence see K. Schmidt,Klopstock und seine Freunde(1810); C. A. H. Clodius,Klopstocks Nachlass(1821); J. M. Lappenberg,Briefe von und an Klopstock(1867). Cf. further K. F. Cramer,Klopstock, er und über ihn(1780-1792); J. G. Gruber,Klopstocks Leben(1832); R. Hamel,Klopstock-Studien(1879-1880); F. Muncker,F. G. Klopstock, the most authoritative biography, (1888); E. Bailly,Étude sur la vie et les œuvres de Klopstock(Paris, 1888).

KLOSTERNEUBURG,a town of Austria, in Lower Austria, 5½ m. N.W. of Vienna by rail. Pop. (1900), 11,595. It is situated on the right bank of the Danube, at the foot of the Kahlenberg, and is divided by a small stream into an upper and a lower town. As an important pioneer station Klosterneuburg has various military buildings and stores, and among the schools it possesses an academy of wine and fruit cultivation.

On a hill rising directly from the banks of the Danube stand the magnificent buildings (erected 1730-1834) of the Augustine canonry, founded in 1106 by Margrave Leopold the Holy. This foundation is the oldest and richest of the kind in Austria; itowns much of the land upon which the north-western suburbs of Vienna stand. Among the points of interest within it are the old chapel of 1318, with Leopold’s tomb and the altar of Verdun, dating from the 12th century, the treasury and relic-chamber, the library with 30,000 volumes and many MSS., the picture gallery, the collection of coins, the theological hall, and the wine-cellar, containing an immense tun like that at Heidelberg. The inhabitants of Klosterneuburg are mainly occupied in making wine, of excellent quality. There is a large cement factory outside the town. In Roman times the castle of Citium stood in the region of Klosterneuburg. The town was founded by Charlemagne, and received its charter as a town in 1298.

KLOTZ, REINHOLD(1807-1870), German classical scholar, was born near Chemnitz in Saxony on the 13th of March 1807. In 1849 he was appointed professor in the university of Leipzig in succession to Gottfried Hermann, and held this post till his death on the 10th of August 1870. Klotz was a man of unwearied industry, and devoted special attention to Latin literature.

He was the author of editions of several classical authors, of which the most important were: the complete works of Cicero (2nd ed., 1869-1874); Clement of Alexandria (1831-1834); Euripides (1841-1867), in continuation of Pflugk’s edition, but unfinished; Terence (1838-1840), with the commentaries of Donatus and Eugraphius. Mention should also be made of:Handwörterbuch der lateinischen Sprache(5th ed., 1874);Römische Litteraturgeschichte(1847), of which only the introductory volume appeared; an edition of the treatiseDe Graecae linguae particulis(1835-1842) of Matthaeus Deverius (Devares), a learned Corfiote (c.1500-1570), and corrector of the Greek MSS. in the Vatican; the posthumousIndex Ciceronianus(1872) andHandbuch der lateinischen Stilistik(1874). From 1831-1855 Klotz was editor of theNeue Jahrbücher für Philologie(Leipzig). During the troubled times of 1848 and the following years he showed himself a strong conservative.A memoir by his son Richard will be found in theJahrbücherfor 1871, pp. 154-163.

He was the author of editions of several classical authors, of which the most important were: the complete works of Cicero (2nd ed., 1869-1874); Clement of Alexandria (1831-1834); Euripides (1841-1867), in continuation of Pflugk’s edition, but unfinished; Terence (1838-1840), with the commentaries of Donatus and Eugraphius. Mention should also be made of:Handwörterbuch der lateinischen Sprache(5th ed., 1874);Römische Litteraturgeschichte(1847), of which only the introductory volume appeared; an edition of the treatiseDe Graecae linguae particulis(1835-1842) of Matthaeus Deverius (Devares), a learned Corfiote (c.1500-1570), and corrector of the Greek MSS. in the Vatican; the posthumousIndex Ciceronianus(1872) andHandbuch der lateinischen Stilistik(1874). From 1831-1855 Klotz was editor of theNeue Jahrbücher für Philologie(Leipzig). During the troubled times of 1848 and the following years he showed himself a strong conservative.

A memoir by his son Richard will be found in theJahrbücherfor 1871, pp. 154-163.

KNARESBOROUGH,a market town in the Ripon parliamentary division of the West Riding of Yorkshire, England, 16½ m. W. by N. from York by a branch of the North Eastern railway. Pop. of urban district (1901), 4979. Its situation is most picturesque, on the steep left bank of the river Nidd, which here follows a well-wooded valley, hemmed in by limestone cliffs. The church of St John the Baptist is Early English, but has numerous Decorated and Perpendicular additions; it is a cruciform building containing several interesting monuments. Knaresborough Castle was probably founded in 1070 by Serlo de Burgh. Its remains, however, are of the 14th century, and include a massive keep rising finely from a cliff above the Nidd. After the battle of Marston Moor it was taken by Fairfax, and in 1648 it was ordered to be dismantled. To the south of the castle is St Robert’s chapel, an excavation in the rock constructed into an ecclesiastical edifice in the reign of Richard I. Several of the excavations in the limestone, which is extensively quarried, are incorporated in dwelling-houses. A little farther down the river is St Robert’s cave, which is supposed to have been the residence of the hermit, and in 1744 was the scene of the murder of Daniel Clarke by Eugene Aram, whose story is told in Lytton’s well-known novel. Opposite the castle is the Dropping Well, the waters of which are impregnated with lime and have petrifying power, this action causing the curious and beautiful incrustations formed where the water falls over a slight cliff. The Knaresborough free grammar school was founded in 1616. There is a large agricultural trade, and linen and leather manufactures and the quarries also employ a considerable number of persons.

Knaresborough (Canardesburg,Cnarreburc,Cknareburg), which belonged to the Crown before the Conquest, formed part of William the Conqueror’s grant to his follower Serlo de Burgh. Being forfeited by his grandson Eustace FitzJohn in the reign of Stephen, Knaresborough was granted to Robert de Stuteville, from whose descendants it passed through marriage to Hugh de Morville, one of the murderers of Thomas Becket, who with his three accomplices remained in hiding in the castle for a whole year. During the 13th and 14th centuries the castle and lordship changed hands very frequently; they were granted successively to Hubert de Burgh, whose son forfeited them after the battle of Evesham, to Richard, earl of Cornwall, whose son Edmund died without issue; to Piers Gaveston, and lastly to John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, and so to the Crown as parcel of the duchy of Lancaster. In 1317 John de Lilleburn, who was holding the castle ofKnaresboroughfor Thomas duke of Lancaster against the king, surrendered under conditions to William de Ros of Hamelak, but before leaving the castle managed to destroy all the records of the liberties and privileges of the town which were kept in the castle. In 1368 an inquisition was taken to ascertain these privileges, and the jurors found that the burgesses held “all the soil of their borough yielding 7s. 4d. yearly and doing suit at the king’s court.” In the reign of Henry VIII. Knaresborough is said by Leland to be “no great thing and meanely builded but the market there is quik.” During the civil wars Knaresborough was held for some time by the Royalists, but they were obliged to surrender, and the castle was among those ordered to be destroyed by parliament in 1646. A market on Wednesday and a fortnightly fair on the same day from the Feast of St Mark to that of St Andrew are claimed under a charter of Charles II. confirming earlier charters. Lead ore was found and worked on Knaresborough Common in the 16th century. From 1555 to 1867 the town returned two members to parliament, but in the latter year the number was reduced to one, and in 1885 the representation was merged in that of the West Riding.


Back to IndexNext