It appears to us that a great deal of confusion and a large number of errors which creep into our modern generalizations and hypotheses, may be traced to the acceptance of analogies for identities. How many cases of mistaken identity has the improvement of microscopes revealed during the past quarter of a century. This should at least serve as a caution for the future.
Apart, however, from the “gonidia,” whatever they may be, is the remainder of the lichen a genuine fungus? Nylander writes, “The anatomical filamentose elements of lichens are distinguished by various characters from the hyphæ of fungi. They are firmer, elastic, and at once present themselves in the texture of lichens. On the other hand, the hyphæ of fungi are very soft, they possess a thin wall, and are not at all gelatinous, while they are immediately dissolved by the application of hydrate of potash, &c.”[T]
Our own experience is somewhat to the effect, that there are some few lichens which are doubtful as to whether they are fungi or lichens, but, in by far the majority of cases, there is not the slightest difficulty in determining, from the peculiar firmness and elasticity of the tissues, minute peculiarities which the practised hand can detect rather than describe, and even the general character of the fruit that they differ materially from, though closely allied to fungi. We have only experience to guide us in these matters, but that is something, and we have no experience in fungi of anything like aCladonia, however much it may resemble aTorrubiaorClavaria. We havePezizæwith a subiculum in the sectionTapesia, but the veriest tyro would not confound them with species ofParmelia. It is true that a great number of lichens, at first sight, and casually, resemble species of theHysteriacei, but it is no less strange than true, that lichenologists and mycologists know their own sufficiently not to commit depredations on each other.
Contributions are daily being made to this controversy, and already the principal arguments on both sides have appeared inan English dress,[U]hence it will be unnecessary to repeat those which are modifications only of the views already stated, our own conclusions being capable of a very brief summary: that lichens and fungi are closely related the one to the other, but that they are not identical; that the “gonidia” of lichens are part of the lichen-organization, and consequently are not algæ, or any introduced bodies; that there is no parasitism; and that the lichen thallus, exclusive of gonidia, is wholly unknown amongst fungi.
The Rev. J. M. Crombie has therefore our sympathies in the remark with which his summary of the gonidia controversy closes, in which he characterizes it as a “sensational romance of lichenology,” of the “unnatural union between a captive algal damsel and a tyrant fungal master.”
[A]De Bary, “Des Myxomycètes,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. xi. p. 153; “Bot. Zeit.” xvi. p. 357. De Bary’s views are controverted by M. Wigand in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xvi. p. 255, &c.[B]De Bary, “Recherches sur le Developpement de quelques Champignons Parasites,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xx. p. 5.[C]“Popular Science Review,” vol. viii. p. 96.[D]Dr. J. H. Bennett “On the Molecular Origin of Infusoria,” p. 56.[E]They have, however, no close relation with realTorulæ, such asT. monilioides, &c.—Cooke’sHandbook, p. 477.[F]Berkeley’s “Outlines of British Fungology,” p. 24.[G]Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 235.[H]Gray, “Notices of Insects which form the Basis of Fungoid Parasites.”[I]On the relation or connection between fungi and lichens, H. C. Sorby has some pertinent remarks in his communication to the Royal Society on “Comparative Vegetable Chromatology” (Proceedings Royal Society, vol. xxi. 1873, p. 479), as one result of his spectroscopic examinations. He says, “Such being the relations between the organs of reproduction and the foliage, it is to some extent possible to understand the connection between parasitic plants like fungi, which do not derive their support from the constructive energy of their fronds, and those which are self-supporting and possess true fronds. In the highest classes of plants the flowers are connected with the leaves, more especially by means of xanthophyll and yellow xanthophyll, whereas in the case of lichens the apothecia contain very little, if any, of those substances, but a large amount of the lichenoxanthines so characteristic of the class. Looking upon fungi from this chromatological point of view, they bear something like the same relation to lichens that the petals of a leafless parasitic plant would bear to the foliage of one of normal character—that is to say, they are, as it were, the coloured organs of reproduction of parasitic plants of a type closely approaching that of lichens, which, of course, is in very close, if not in absolute agreement with the conclusions drawn by botanists from entirely different data.”[J]Schwendener, “Untersuchungen über den Flechtenthallus.”[K]Crombie (J. M.) “On the Lichen-Gonidia Question,” in “Popular Science Review” for July, 1874.[L]Bornet, (E.), “Recherches sur les Gonidies des Lichens,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 1873, 5 sér. vol. xvii.[M]Nylander, “On the Algo-Lichen Hypothesis,” &c., in “Grevillea,” vol. ii. (1874), No. 22, p. 146.[N]In Regensburg “Flora,” 1870, p. 92.[O]Rev. J. M. Crombie, in “Popular Science Review,” July, 1874.[P]Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 373, fig. 78a.[Q]Berkeley’s “Introduction,” p. 341, fig. 76.[R]“Annals and Magazine of Natural History,” April, 1849.[S]In “Gardener’s Chronicle” for 1873, p. 1341.[T]“Grevillea,” vol ii. p. 147, in note.[U]W. Archer, in “Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.” vol. xiii. p. 217; vol. xiv. p. 115. Translation of Schwendener’s “Nature of the Gonidia of Lichens,” in same journal, vol. xiii. p. 235.
[A]De Bary, “Des Myxomycètes,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. xi. p. 153; “Bot. Zeit.” xvi. p. 357. De Bary’s views are controverted by M. Wigand in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xvi. p. 255, &c.
De Bary, “Des Myxomycètes,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. xi. p. 153; “Bot. Zeit.” xvi. p. 357. De Bary’s views are controverted by M. Wigand in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xvi. p. 255, &c.
[B]De Bary, “Recherches sur le Developpement de quelques Champignons Parasites,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xx. p. 5.
De Bary, “Recherches sur le Developpement de quelques Champignons Parasites,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 4 sér. (Bot.) xx. p. 5.
[C]“Popular Science Review,” vol. viii. p. 96.
“Popular Science Review,” vol. viii. p. 96.
[D]Dr. J. H. Bennett “On the Molecular Origin of Infusoria,” p. 56.
Dr. J. H. Bennett “On the Molecular Origin of Infusoria,” p. 56.
[E]They have, however, no close relation with realTorulæ, such asT. monilioides, &c.—Cooke’sHandbook, p. 477.
They have, however, no close relation with realTorulæ, such asT. monilioides, &c.—Cooke’sHandbook, p. 477.
[F]Berkeley’s “Outlines of British Fungology,” p. 24.
Berkeley’s “Outlines of British Fungology,” p. 24.
[G]Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 235.
Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 235.
[H]Gray, “Notices of Insects which form the Basis of Fungoid Parasites.”
Gray, “Notices of Insects which form the Basis of Fungoid Parasites.”
[I]On the relation or connection between fungi and lichens, H. C. Sorby has some pertinent remarks in his communication to the Royal Society on “Comparative Vegetable Chromatology” (Proceedings Royal Society, vol. xxi. 1873, p. 479), as one result of his spectroscopic examinations. He says, “Such being the relations between the organs of reproduction and the foliage, it is to some extent possible to understand the connection between parasitic plants like fungi, which do not derive their support from the constructive energy of their fronds, and those which are self-supporting and possess true fronds. In the highest classes of plants the flowers are connected with the leaves, more especially by means of xanthophyll and yellow xanthophyll, whereas in the case of lichens the apothecia contain very little, if any, of those substances, but a large amount of the lichenoxanthines so characteristic of the class. Looking upon fungi from this chromatological point of view, they bear something like the same relation to lichens that the petals of a leafless parasitic plant would bear to the foliage of one of normal character—that is to say, they are, as it were, the coloured organs of reproduction of parasitic plants of a type closely approaching that of lichens, which, of course, is in very close, if not in absolute agreement with the conclusions drawn by botanists from entirely different data.”
On the relation or connection between fungi and lichens, H. C. Sorby has some pertinent remarks in his communication to the Royal Society on “Comparative Vegetable Chromatology” (Proceedings Royal Society, vol. xxi. 1873, p. 479), as one result of his spectroscopic examinations. He says, “Such being the relations between the organs of reproduction and the foliage, it is to some extent possible to understand the connection between parasitic plants like fungi, which do not derive their support from the constructive energy of their fronds, and those which are self-supporting and possess true fronds. In the highest classes of plants the flowers are connected with the leaves, more especially by means of xanthophyll and yellow xanthophyll, whereas in the case of lichens the apothecia contain very little, if any, of those substances, but a large amount of the lichenoxanthines so characteristic of the class. Looking upon fungi from this chromatological point of view, they bear something like the same relation to lichens that the petals of a leafless parasitic plant would bear to the foliage of one of normal character—that is to say, they are, as it were, the coloured organs of reproduction of parasitic plants of a type closely approaching that of lichens, which, of course, is in very close, if not in absolute agreement with the conclusions drawn by botanists from entirely different data.”
[J]Schwendener, “Untersuchungen über den Flechtenthallus.”
Schwendener, “Untersuchungen über den Flechtenthallus.”
[K]Crombie (J. M.) “On the Lichen-Gonidia Question,” in “Popular Science Review” for July, 1874.
Crombie (J. M.) “On the Lichen-Gonidia Question,” in “Popular Science Review” for July, 1874.
[L]Bornet, (E.), “Recherches sur les Gonidies des Lichens,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 1873, 5 sér. vol. xvii.
Bornet, (E.), “Recherches sur les Gonidies des Lichens,” in “Ann. des Sci. Nat.” 1873, 5 sér. vol. xvii.
[M]Nylander, “On the Algo-Lichen Hypothesis,” &c., in “Grevillea,” vol. ii. (1874), No. 22, p. 146.
Nylander, “On the Algo-Lichen Hypothesis,” &c., in “Grevillea,” vol. ii. (1874), No. 22, p. 146.
[N]In Regensburg “Flora,” 1870, p. 92.
In Regensburg “Flora,” 1870, p. 92.
[O]Rev. J. M. Crombie, in “Popular Science Review,” July, 1874.
Rev. J. M. Crombie, in “Popular Science Review,” July, 1874.
[P]Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 373, fig. 78a.
Berkeley’s “Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany,” p. 373, fig. 78a.
[Q]Berkeley’s “Introduction,” p. 341, fig. 76.
Berkeley’s “Introduction,” p. 341, fig. 76.
[R]“Annals and Magazine of Natural History,” April, 1849.
“Annals and Magazine of Natural History,” April, 1849.
[S]In “Gardener’s Chronicle” for 1873, p. 1341.
In “Gardener’s Chronicle” for 1873, p. 1341.
[T]“Grevillea,” vol ii. p. 147, in note.
“Grevillea,” vol ii. p. 147, in note.
[U]W. Archer, in “Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.” vol. xiii. p. 217; vol. xiv. p. 115. Translation of Schwendener’s “Nature of the Gonidia of Lichens,” in same journal, vol. xiii. p. 235.
W. Archer, in “Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.” vol. xiii. p. 217; vol. xiv. p. 115. Translation of Schwendener’s “Nature of the Gonidia of Lichens,” in same journal, vol. xiii. p. 235.
II.STRUCTURE.
Without some knowledge of the structure of fungi, it is scarcely possible to comprehend the principles of classification, or to appreciate the curious phenomena of polymorphism. Yet there is so great a variety in the structure of the different groups, that this subject cannot be compressed within a few paragraphs, neither do we think that this would be desired if practicable, seeing that the anatomy and physiology of plants is, in itself, sufficiently important and interesting to warrant a rather extended and explicit survey. In order to impart as much practical utility as possible to this chapter, it seems advisable to treat some of the most important and typical orders and suborders separately, giving prominence to the features which are chiefly characteristic of those sections, following the order of systematists as much as possible, whilst endeavouring to render each section independent to a considerable extent, and complete in itself. Some groups naturally present more noteworthy features than others, and will consequently seem to receive more than their proportional share of attention, but this seeming inequality could scarcely have been avoided, inasmuch as hitherto some groups have been more closely investigated than others, are more intimately associated with other questions, or are more readily and satisfactorily examined under different aspects of their life-history.
Fig. 1.Fig. 1.—Agaric in Process of Growth.
Fig. 1.—Agaric in Process of Growth.
Agaricini.—For the structure that prevails in the order to which the mushroom belongs, an examination of that species will be almost sufficient. Here we shall at once recognizethree distinct parts requiring elucidation, viz. the rooting slender fibres that traverse the soil, and termed themycelium, or spawn, the stem and cap or pileus, which together constitute what is called thehymenophore, and the plates or gills on the under surface of the cap, which bear thehymenium. The earliest condition in which the mushroom can be recognized as a vegetable entity is in that of the “spawn” or mycelium, which is essentially an agglomeration of vegetating spores. Its normal form is that of branched, slender, entangled, anastomosing, hyaline threads. At certain privileged points of the mycelium, the threads seem to be aggregated, and become centres of vertical extension. At first only a small nearly globose budding, like a grain of mustard seed, is visible, but this afterwards increases rapidly, and other similar buddings or swellings appear at the base.[A]These are the young hymenophore. Asit pushes through the soil, it gradually loses its globose form, becomes more or less elongated, and in this condition a longitudinal section shows the position of the future gills in a pair of opposite crescent-shaped darker-coloured spots near the apex. The dermal membrane, or outer skin, seems to be continuous over the stem and the globose head. At present, there is no external evidence of an expanded pileus and gills; a longitudinal section at this stage shows that the gills are being developed, that the pileus is assuming its cap-like form, that the membrane stretching from the stem to the edge of the young pileus is separating from the edge of the gills, and forming aveil, which, in course of time, will separate below and leave the gills exposed. When, therefore, the mushroom has arrived almost at maturity, the pileus expands, and in this act the veil is torn away from the margin of the cap, and remains for a time like a collar around the stem. Fragments of the veil often remain attached to the margin of the pileus, and the collar adherent to the stem falls back, and thenceforth is known as theannulusor ring. We have in this stage the fully-developed hymenophore,—the stem with its ring, supporting an expanded cap or pileus, with gills on the under surface bearing the hymenium.[B]A longitudinal section cut through the pileus and downthe stem, gives the best notion of the arrangement of the parts, and their relation to the whole. By this means it will be seen that the pileus is continuous with the stem, that the substance of the pileus descends into the gills, and that relatively the substance of the stem is more fibrous than that of the pileus. In the common mushroom the ring is very distinct surrounding the stem, a little above the middle, like a collar. In some Agarics the ring is very fugacious, or absent altogether. The form of the gills, their mode of attachment to the stem, their colour, and more especially the colour of the spores, are all very important features to be attended to in the discrimination of species, since they vary in different species. The whole substance of the Agaric is cellular. A longitudinal slice from the stem will exhibit under the microscope delicate tubular cells, the general direction of which is lengthwise, with lateral branches, the whole interlacing so intimately that it is difficult to trace any individual thread very far in its course. It will be evident that the structure is less compact as it approaches the centre of the stem, which in many species is hollow. Thehymeniumis the spore-bearing surface, which is exposed or naked, and spread over the gills. These plates are covered on all sides with a delicate membrane, upon which the reproductive organs are developed. If it were possible to remove this membrane in one entire piece and spread it out flat, it would cover an immense surface, as compared with the size of the pileus, for it is plaited or folded like a lady’s fan over the whole of the gill-plates, or lamellæ, of the fungus.[C]If the stem of a mushroom be cut off close to the gills, and the cap laid upon a sheet of paper, with the gills downwards, and left there for a few hours, when removed a number of dark radiating lines will be deposited upon the paper, each line corresponding with the interstices between one pair of gills. These lines are made up of spores which have fallen from the hymenium, and, if placed under the microscope, their character will at once be made evident. If a fragment of the hymenium be also submitted to a similar examination, it will be found that the whole surface is studdedwith spores. The first peculiarity which will be observed is, that these spores are almost uniformly in groups of four together. The next feature to be observed is, that each spore is borne upon a slender stalk or sterigma, and that four of these sterigmata proceed from the apex of a thicker projection, from the hymenium, called abasidium, each basidium being the supporter of four sterigmata, and each sterigma of a spore.[D]A closer examination of the hymenium will reveal the fact that the basidia are accompanied by other bodies, often larger, but without sterigmata or spores; these have been termedcystidia, and their structure and functions have been the subject of much controversy.[E]Both kinds of bodies are produced on the hymenium of most, if not all, the Agaricini.
Fig. 2.Fig. 2.—Section of Common Mushroom.
Fig. 2.—Section of Common Mushroom.
The basidia are usually expanded upwards, so as to have more or less of a clavate form, surmounted by four slender points, or tubular processes, each supporting a spore; the contents of these cells are granular, mixed apparently with oleaginous particles, which communicate through the slender tubes of the spicules with the interior of the spores. Corda states that, although only one spore is produced at a time on each sporophore, when this falls away others are produced in succession for a limited period. As the spores approach maturity, the connection between their contents and the contents of the basidia diminishes and ultimately ceases. When the basidium which bears mature spores is still well charged with granular matter, it may be presumed that the production of a second or thirdseries of spores is quite possible. Basidia exhausted entirely of their contents, and which have become quite hyaline, may often be observed.
Fig. 3.Fig. 3.—a.Sterile cells.b.Basidia.c.Cystidium. FromGomphidius(de Seynes).
Fig. 3.—a.Sterile cells.b.Basidia.c.Cystidium. FromGomphidius(de Seynes).
The cystidia are usually larger than the basidia, varying in size and form in different species. They present the appearance of large sterile cells, attenuated upwards, sometimes into a slender neck. Corda was of opinion that these were male organs, and gave them the name ofpollinaires. Hoffmann has also described[F]both these organs under the names ofpollinariaandspermatia, but does not appear to recognize in them the sexual elements which those names would indicate; whilst de Seynes suggests that the cystidia are only organs returned to vegetative functions by a sort of hypertrophy of the basidia.[G]This view seems to be supported by the fact that, in the sectionPluteusand some others, the cystidia are surmounted by short horns resembling sterigmata. Hoffmann has also indicated[H]the passage of cystidia into basidia. The evidence seems to be in favour of regarding the cystidia as barren conditions of basidia. There are to be found upon the hymenium of Agarics a third kind of elongated cells, called by Corda[I]basilary cells, and by Hoffmann “sterile cells,” which are either equal in size or smaller than the basidia, with which also their structure agrees, excepting in the development of spicules. These are the “proper cells of the hymenium” of Léveillé, and are simply the terminal cells of the gill structure—cells which, under vigorous conditions, might be developed into basidia, but which are commonly arrested in their development. As suggested by de Seynes, the hymenium seems to be reduced to great simplicity, “one sole and self-same organ is the basis of it; according as it experiences an arrest of development, as it grows and fructifies, or as it becomes hypertrophied, it gives us a paraphyse, a basidium, or a cystidium—in other terms, atrophied basidium, normal basidiumand hypertrophied basidium; these are the three elements which form the hymenium.”[J]
The only reproductive organs hitherto demonstrated in Agarics are the spores, or, as sometimes called, from their method of production,basidiospores.[K]These are at first colourless, but afterwards acquire the colour peculiar to the species. In size and form they are, within certain limits, exceedingly variable, although form and size are tolerably constant in the same species. At first all are globose; as they mature, the majority are ovoid or elliptic; some are fusiform, with regularly attenuated extremities. InHygrophorusthey are rather irregular, reniform, or compressed in the middle. Sometimes the external surface is rough with more or less projecting warts. Some mycologists are of opinion that the covering of the spore is double, consisting of anexosporeand anendospore, the latter being very fine and delicate. In other orders the double coating of the spore has been demonstrated. When the spore is coloured, the external membrane alone appears to possess colour, the endospore being constantly hyaline. It may be added here, that in this order the spore is simple and unicellular. InLactariusandRussulathe trama, or inner substance, is vesicular. True latex vessels occur occasionally inAgaricus, though not filled with milk as inLactarius.
Fig. 4.Fig. 4.—Polyporus giganteus(reduced).
Fig. 4.—Polyporus giganteus(reduced).
Polyporei.—In this order the gill plates are replaced by tubes or pores, the interior of which is lined by the hymenium; indications of this structure having already been exhibited in some of the lowerAgaricini.In many cases the stem is suppressed. The substance is fleshy inBoletus, but inPolyporusthe greater number of species are leathery or corky, and more persistent. The basidia, spicules, and quaternate spores agree with those ofAgaricini.[L]In fact there are no features of importance which relate to the hymenium in any order ofHymenomycetes(theTremelliniexcepted) differing from the same organ inAgaricini, unless it be the absence ofcystidia.
Fig. 5.Fig. 5.—Hydnum repandum.
Fig. 5.—Hydnum repandum.
Hydnei.—Instead of pores, in this order the hymenium is spread over the surface of spines, prickles, or warts.[M]
Auricularini.—The hymenium is more or less even, and in—
Clavarieithe whole fungus is club-shaped, or more or less intricately branched, with the hymenium covering the outer surface.
Fig. 6.Fig. 6.—Calocera viscosa.
Fig. 6.—Calocera viscosa.
Tremellini.—In this order we have a great departure from the character of the substance, external appearance, and internal structure of the other orders in this family. Here we have a gelatinous substance, and the form is lobed, folded, convolute, often resembling the brain of some animal. The internal structurehas been specially illustrated by M. Tulasne,[N]through the common species,Tremella mesenterica. This latter is of a fine golden yellow colour, and rather large size. It is uniformly composed throughout of a colourless mucilage, with no appreciable texture, in which are distributed very fine, diversely branched and anastomosing filaments. Towards the surface, the ultimate branches of this filamentous network give birth, both at their summits and laterally, to globular cells, which acquire a comparatively large size. These cells are filled with a protoplasm, to which the plant owes its orange colour. When they have attained their normal dimensions, they elongate at the summit into two, three, or four distinct, thick, obtuse tubes, into which the protoplasm gradually passes. The development of these tubes is unequal and not simultaneous, so that one will often attain its full dimensions, equal, perhaps, to three or four times the diameter of the generative cell, whilst the others are only just appearing. By degrees, as each tube attains its full size, it is attenuated into a fine point, the extremity of which swells into a spheroidal cell, which ultimately becomes a spore. Sometimes these tubes, or spicules, send out one or two lateral branches, each terminated by a spore. These spores (about ·006 to ·008mm.diameter) are smooth, and deposit themselves, like a fine white dust, on the surface of theTremellaand on its matrix. M. Léveillé[O]was of opinion thatthe basidia of the Tremellini were monosporous, whilst M. Tulasne has demonstrated that they are habitually tetrasporous, as in other of the Hymenomycetes. Although agreeing in this, they differ in other features, especially in the globose form of the basidia, mode of production of the spicules, and, finally, the division of the basidia into two, three, or four cells by septa which cut each other in their axis. This division precedes the growth of the spicules. It is not rare to see these cells, formed at the expense of an unilocular basidium, become partly isolated from each other; in certain cases they seem to have separated very early, they then become larger than usual, and are grouped on the same filament so as to represent a kind of buds. This phenomenon usually takes place below the level of the fertile cells, at a certain depth in the mucous tissue of theTremella.
Fig. 7.Fig. 7.—Tremella mesenterica.
Fig. 7.—Tremella mesenterica.
Besides the reproductive system here described, Tulasne also made known the existence of a series of filaments which produce spermatia. These filaments are often scattered and confused with those which produce the basidia, and not distinguishable from them in size or any other apparent characteristic, except the manner in which their extremities are branched in order to produce the spermatia. At other times the spermatia-bearing surface covers exclusively certain portions of the fungus, especially the inferior lobes, imparting thereto a very bright orange colour, which is communicated by the layer of spermatia, unmixed with spores. These spots retain their bright colour, while the remainder of the plant becomes pale, or covered with a white dust. The spermatia are very small, spherical, and smooth, scarcely equalling ·002mm.They are sessile, sometimes solitary, sometimes three or four together, on the slightly swollen extremities of certain filaments of the weft of the fungus.[P]Tulasne found it impossible to make these corpuscles germinate, and in all essential particulars they agreed with the spermatia found in ascomycetous fungi.
In the genusDacrymyces, the same observer found the structureto have great affinity with that ofTremella. The spores in the species examined were of a different form, being oblong, very obtuse, slightly curved (·013 - ·019 × ·004 - ·006mm.), at first unilocular, but afterwards triseptate. The basidia are cylindrical or clavate, filled with coloured granular matter; each of these bifurcates at the summit, and gradually elongates into two very open branches, which are attenuated above, and ultimately each is crowned by a spore. There are to be found also in the species of this genus globose bodies, designated “sporidioles” by M. Léveillé, which Tulasne took considerable care to trace to their source. He thus accounts for them:—Each of the cells of the spore emits exteriorly one or several of these corpuscles, supported on very short and very slender pedicels, which remain after the corpuscles are detached from them, new corpuscles succeeding the first as long as there remains any plastic matter within the spore. The pedicels are not all on the same plane; they are often implanted all on the same, and oftenest on the convex side of the reproductive body. These corpuscles, though placed under the most favourable conditions, never gave the least sign of vegetation, and Tulasne concludes that they are spermatia, analogous to those produced inTremella. The spores which produce spermatia are not at all apt to germinate, whilst those which did not produce spermatia germinated freely. Hence it would appear that, although all spores seem to be perfectly identical, they have not all the same function. The same observer detected also amongst specimens of theDacrymycessome of a darker and reddish tint, always bare of spores or spermatia on the surface, and these presented a somewhat different structure. Where the tissue had turned red it was sterile, the constituent filaments, ordinarily colourless, and almost empty of solid matter, were filled with a highly-coloured protoplasm; they were of less tenuity, more irregularly thick, and instead of only rarely presenting partitions, and remaining continuous, as in other parts of the plant, were parcelled out into an infinity of straight or curved pieces, angular and of irregular form, especially towards the surface of the fungus, where they compose a sort of pulp, varying in cohesion according to the dry or moist condition ofthe atmosphere. All parts of these reddish individuals seemed more or less infected with this disintegration, the basidia divided by transverse diaphragms into several cylindrical or oblong pieces, which finally become free. Transitional conditions were also observed in mixed individuals. This sterile condition is called by Tulasne “gemmiparous,” and he believes that it has ere now given origin to one or more spurious species, and misled mycologists as to the real structure of perfect and fruitfulDacrymyces.
Phalloidei.—In this order the hymenium is at first enclosed within a sort of peridium or universal volva, maintaining a somewhat globose or egg-shape. This envelope consists of an outer and inner coat of somewhat similar texture, and an intermediate gelatinous layer, often of considerable thickness. When a section is made of the fungus, whilst still enclosed in the volva, the hymenium is found to present numerous cavities, in which basidia are developed, each surmounted by spicules (four to six) bearing oval or oblong spores.[Q]It is very difficult to observe the structure of the hymenium in this order, on account of its deliquescent nature. As the hymenium approaches maturity, the volva is ruptured, and the plant rapidly enlarges. InPhallus, a long erect cellular stem bears the cap, over which the hymenium is spread, and this expands enormously after escaping the restraint of the volva. Soon after exposure, the hymenium deliquesces into a dark mucilage, coloured by the minute spores, which drips from the pileus, often diffusing a most loathsome odour for a considerable distance. InClathrus, the receptacle forms a kind of network. InAseröe, the pileus is beautifully stellate. In many the attractive forms would be considered objects of beauty, were it not for their deliquescence, and often fœtid odour.[R]
Fig. 8.Fig. 8.—Basidia and spores ofPhallus.
Fig. 8.—Basidia and spores ofPhallus.
Podaxinei.—This is a small but very curious group of fungi, in which the peridium resembles a volva, which is more or less confluent with the surface of the pileus. They assume hymenomycetal forms, some of them looking like Agarics, Boleti, or species ofHydnum, with deformed gills, pores, or spines; inMontagnites, in fact, the gill structure is very distinct. The spores are borne in definite clusters on short pedicels in such of the genera as have been examined.[S]
Hypogæi.—These are subterranean puff-balls, in which sometimes a distinct peridium is present; but in most cases it consists entirely of an external series of cells, continuous with the internal structure, and cannot be correctly estimated as a peridium. The hymenium is sinuous and convolute, bearing basidia with sterigmata and spores in the cavities. Sometimes the cavities are traversed by threads, as in theMyxogastres. The spores are in many instances beautifully echinulate, sometimes globose, at others elongated, and produced in such numbers as to lead to the belief that their development is successive on the spicules. When fully matured, the peridia are filled with a dusty mass of spores, so that it is scarcely possible in this condition to gain any notion of the structure. This is, indeed, the case with nearly allGasteromycetes. Thehypogæousfungi are curiously connected withPhalloideiby the genusHysterangium.
Fig. 9.Fig. 9.—Basidia and spores ofLycoperdon.
Fig. 9.—Basidia and spores ofLycoperdon.
Trichogastres.[T]—In their early stages the species contained in this group are not gelatinous, as in theMyxogastres, but are rather fleshy and firm. Very little has been added to our knowledge of structure in this group since 1839 and 1842, when one of us wrote to the following effect:—If a young plant ofLycoperdon cœlatumorL. gemmatumbe cut through and examined with a common pocket lens, it will be found to consist of a fleshy mass,perforated in every direction with minute elongated, reticulated, anastomosing, labyrinthiform cavities. The resemblance of these to the tubes ofBoletiin an early stage of growth, first led me to suspect that there must be some very close connection between them. If a very thin slice now be taken, while the mass is yet firm, and before there is the slightest indication of a change of colour, the outer stratum of the walls of these cavities is found to consist of pellucid obtuse cells, placed parallel to each other like the pile of velvet, exactly as in the young hymenium of an Agaric or Boletus. Occasionally one or two filaments cross from one wall to another, and once I have seen these anastomose. At a more advanced stage of growth, four little spicules are developed at the tips of the sporophores, all of which, as far as I have been able to observe, are fertile and of equal height, and on each of these spicules a globose spore is seated. It is clear that we have here a structure identical with that of the true Hymenomycetes, a circumstance which accords well with the fleshy habit and mode of growth. There is some difficulty in ascertaining the exact structure of the species just noticed, as the fruit-bearing cells, or sporophores, are very small, and when the spicules are developed the substance becomes so flaccid that it is difficult to cut a proper slice, even with the sharpest lancet. I have, however, satisfied myself as to the true structure by repeated observations. But should any difficulty arise in verifying it in the species in question, there will be none in doing so inLycoperdon giganteum. In this species the fructifying mass consists of the same sinuous cavities, which are, however, smaller, so that the substance is more compact, and I have not seen them traversed by any filaments. In an early stage of growth, the surface of the hymenium, that is of the walls of the cavities, consists of short threads composed of two or three articulations, which are slightly constricted at thejoints, from which, especially from the last, spring short branchlets, often consisting of a single cell. Sometimes two or more branchlets spring from the same point. Occasionally the threads are constricted without any dissepiments, the terminal articulations are obtuse, and soon swell very much, so as greatly to exceed in diameter those on which they are seated. When arrived at their full growth, they are somewhat obovate, and produce four spicules, which at length are surmounted each with a globose spore. When the spores are fully developed, the sporophores wither, and if a solution of iodine be applied, which changes the spores to a rich brown, they will be seen still adhering by their spicules to the faded sporophores. The spores soon become free, but the spicule often still adheres to them; but they are not attached to the intermingled filaments. InBovista plumbea, the spores have very long peduncles.[U]As in theHymenomycetes, the prevailing type of reproductive organs consisted of quaternary spores borne on spicules; so inGasteromycetes, the prevailing type, in so far as it is yet known, is very similar, in some cases nearly identical, consisting of a definite number of minute spores borne on spicules seated on basidia. In a very large number of genera, the minute structure and development of the fructification (beyond the mature spores) is almost unknown, but from analogy it may be concluded that a method prevails in a large group like theMyxogastreswhich does not differ in essential particulars from that which is known to exist in other groups. The difficulties in the way of studying the development of the spores in this are far greater than in the previous order.
Fig. 10.Fig. 10.—a.Threads ofTrichia.b.Portion further magnified, with spores.c.Portion of spinulose thread.
Fig. 10.—a.Threads ofTrichia.b.Portion further magnified, with spores.c.Portion of spinulose thread.
Myxogastres.—At one time that celebrated mycologist, Professor De Bary, seemed disposed to exclude this group from the vegetable kingdom altogether, and relegate them to a companionship with amœboid forms. But in more recent works he seems to have reconsidered, and almost, if not entirely, abandoned, that disposition. These fungi, mostly minute, are characterized in their early stages by their gelatinous nature. The substanceof which they are then composed bears considerable resemblance to sarcode, and, did they never change from this, there might be some excuse for doubting as to their vegetable nature; but as the species proceed towards maturity they lose their mucilaginous texture, and become a mass of spores, intermixed with threads, surrounded by a cellular peridium. Take, for instance, the genusTrichia, and we have in the matured specimens a somewhat globose peridium, not larger than a mustard seed, and sometimes nearly of the same colour; this ultimately ruptures and exposes a mass of minute yellow spherical spores, intermixed with threads of the same colour.[V]These threads, when highly magnified, exhibit in themselves a spiral arrangement, which has been the basis of some controversy, and in some species these threads are externally spinulose. The chief controversy on these threads has been whether the spiral markings are external or internal, whether caused by twisting of the thread or by the presence of an external or internal fibre. The spiral appearance has never been called in question, only the structure from whence it arises, and this, like the striæ of diatoms, is very much an open question. Mr. Currey held that the spiralappearance may be accounted for by supposing the existence of an accurate elevation in the wall of the cell, following a spiral direction from one end of the thread to the other. This supposition would, he thinks, accord well with the optical appearances, and it would account exactly for the undulations of outline to which he alludes. He states that he had in his possession a thread ofTrichia chrysosperma, in which the spiral appearance was so manifestly caused by an elevation of this nature, in which it is so clear that no internal spiral fibre exists, that he did not think there could be a doubt in the mind of any person carefully examining it with a power of 500 diameters that the cause of the spiral appearance was not a spiral fibre. InArcyria, threads of a different kind are present; they mostly branch and anastomose, and are externally furnished with prominent warts or spines, which Mr. Currey[W]holds are also arranged in a spiral manner around the threads. In other Myxogastres, threads are also present without any appreciable spiral markings or spines. In the mature condition of these fungi, they so clearly resemble, and have such close affinities with, the Trichogastres that one is led almost to doubt whether it was not on hasty grounds, without due examination or consideration, that proposals were made to remove them from the society of their kindred.
Fig. 11.Fig. 11.—Arcyria incarnata, with portion of threads and spore, magnified.
Fig. 11.—Arcyria incarnata, with portion of threads and spore, magnified.
Fig. 12.Fig. 12.—Diachæa elegans.
Fig. 12.—Diachæa elegans.
Very little is known of the development of the spores in this group; in the early stages the whole substance is so pulpy, and in the latter so dusty, whilst the transition from one tothe other is so rapid, that the relation between the spores and threads, and their mode of attachment, has never been definitely made out. It has been supposed that the spinulose projections from the capillitium in some species are the remains of pedicels from which, the spores have fallen, but there is no evidence beyond this supposition in its favour, whilst on the other hand, inStemonitis, for instance, there is a profuse interlacing capillitium, and no spines have been detected. In order to strengthen the supposition, spines should be more commonly present. The threads, or capillitium, form a beautiful reticulated network inStemonitis,Cribraria,Diachæa,Dictydium, &c. InSpumaria,Reticularia,Lycogala, &c., they are almost obsolete.[X]In no group is the examination of the development of structure more difficult, for the reasons already alleged, than in the Myxogastres.