Treachery to Germanism.

439.England is now showing on what feeble feet its Germanism rests, how unsound, how profoundly unworthy of the German Thought it is. It cannot shake off its bitter accusers—its Shakespeare and Carlyle, its Dickens and Kingsley. It has committed treason against the spirit of its greatest men, who were filled with the certainty that the German Thought must conquer, and that this victory must bethevictory ... of Kultur, civilization and spiritual progress.—K. Engelbrecht, D.D.D.K., p. 57.

440.Would to God Professor Engel were right in maintaining that the English are Kelts. Then we should not have to be ashamed of our brothers!—Pastor B. Lösche, D.S.E.S.D., p. 4.

441.It is useless for publicists to encourage the popular belief that the English prove by their behaviour that they are no longer Teutons; for Teutons they are, and purer Teutons than many Germans.[42]—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 45.

442.Does one German cousin fight against another? We good-natured idealists have always dwelt upon this German cousinship. The three-quarters-Keltic England has no feeling of common Germanism.—O.A.H. Schmitz, D.W.D., p. 15.

443.What about ... our dear cousins the English, those hucksters whose Germanism we have at last begun openly to question.... Though the English language is doubtless Germanic, that is by no means a proof that the Keltic bastards have acquired the German nature (Wesen). We do not count the English-speaking American negroes as belonging to the white race.—O. Siemens, W.L.K.D., p. 18.

444.Against us stands the world's greatest sham of a people ... the Judas among nations, who this time, for a change, betrays Germanism for thirty pieces of silver. Against us stands sensual France, the harlot (Dirne) among the peoples, to be bought for any prurient excitement, shameless, unblushing, impudent and cowardly [!] with her worthless myrmidons.—"War Devotions," byPastor J. Rump, quoted in H.A.H., p. 117.

445.Abysmal hypocrisy ... the national vice has been incarnated for us inSir Edward Grey.—Prof. G. Roethe, D.R.S.Z., No. i, p. 14.

446.When that English gentleman, Minister Grey, who has a cancerous tumour in place of a heart, in the end has to reap the infamy he deserves, he will promptly cast it from him as dirt with his horse-hoof.—Pastor Tolzien, in "Patriotic-Evangelical War Lectures," quoted in H.A.H., p. 141.

447.The Englishman treats the foreigner, when he does not need him, as thin air, when he does need him, as a piece of goods; consequently, when he sits in the Cabinet, he considers that, towards a foreign State, a lie is not a lie, deceit is not deceit, and a surprise attack in time of peace is a perfectly legitimate measure, so long as it serves England's interests.—Prof. W. Wundt, D.N.I.P., p. 131.

448.Sir Edward Grey possesses in a singular degree the gift of carrying on business with complete control of all emotion and elimination of all deep thought. Every third word of such person is theuntranslatable, elusive, "I dare say."—O.A.H. Schmitz, D.W.D., p. 14.

449.The untruthfulness and unscrupulous brutality with which the English Cabinet carries on the war place it far below the level of Muscovite morality.—"Germanus."—B.U.D.K., p. 35.

450.The English diplomatist of the type of Sir Edward Grey holds honesty in political matters to be a blunder and a sin. Therefore he usually expresses himself in a form which is capable of several interpretations.—"Germanus," B.U.D.K., p. 18.

451.Sir Edward Grey has for years presided over all the peace conferences—only to ensure the coming of the projected war; he has for years sought a "better understanding" with Germany—only to prevent the honest German statesmen and diplomats from suspecting that a war of annihilation had been irrevocably decreed; the German Emperor, at the last moment, had almost averted the danger of war—Grey, the unctuous apostle of peace, contrived so to shuffle the cards as to renderit inevitable.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 66.

For "shuffling the cards" compare No.371.

452.The President of the United States, Professor Wilson ... allows American munition works to supply our enemies with unlimited quantities of war material, favours the infamous design of England to starve out Germany, and rises in his "peace" speeches to a height of political and religious hypocrisy in no way inferior to that attained by the English "million-murderer" Grey.—Prof. E. Haeckel, E.W., p. 61.

453.The English regard themselves as the Chosen People, towards which all others are predestined to stand in a relation of more or less complete dependence.—Prof. U. v. Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, R. pt. iv., p. 19.

454.Strange as it may appear to us, it is nevertheless unquestionable that allEngland has from of old been penetrated with the idea that her attainment of uncontested colonial and maritime power was not only to her interest but to that of the whole world,the dominion over which God had Himself assigned to her, and that therefore all means to this beneficent end were permissible and well-pleasing to God.—J. Riesser, E.U.W., p. 10.

455.Just because the English found their national feeling on the consciousness of their kultural successes, and the belief that they alone areGod's chosen people on earth, every desire of other peoples to assert equality of rights appears to their self-conceit an offence against the will of God.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 31.

456.The belief in the Kultur-mission entrusted to it by God, in preference to all other peoples, has grown into the very flesh and blood of the English people.—Prof. F. Keutgen, B.R.K., p. 7.

457.The English hold that they are literally descended from the ten tribes [!]. But we Germans do not base our relationto Israel on any such fleshly foundation. The German people are the spiritual, the religious parallel of the people of Israel, they are "the true Israel begotten of the Spirit."—Dr. Preuss, quoted in H.A.H., p. 213.

458.Many of the best, most unselfish and most modest Englishmen pray to God in all good faith that He would at last open the eyes of the German people, and especially of the German Emperor, that they may see how wrong and even sinful it is to place any further hindrances in the way of the expansion of the Kingdom of God on earth by "His chosen people," that is to say, the English themselves.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 12.

459.The Briton regards himself as chosen by Providence, the elect of the Lord, entrusted with a specialmission on this earth, and placed under the immediate protection of Heaven, with a first claim upon all the good things of the earth.—"Germanus," B.U.D.K., p. 11.

460.Our duty to ourselves, and to our English fellow-creatures—since we wouldfain be, not an imaginary "chosen people" but true children of God—is to give them such a thorough thrashing that they may once for all be cured of the fatal illusion that they have established a monopoly in the dear Lord God, and that the rest of humanity is destined only to serve as a stool for their clumsy feet!—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 70.

461.Perhaps the reason that England's power now stands in so great peril is that, in her self-deceiving vanity, she thought that God had guaranteed her the dominion of the world.—Pastor M. Hennig, D.K.U.W., P. 86.

462.It is a matter of fact that the greater part of the English people cherish the pathological imagination that they alone are the true pioneers of Kultur and culture.—Prof. E. Haeckel, E.W., p. 115.

463.The English now assert the claim oftheirKultur to be the only existing, and, indeed, theGod-appointedsummit of human development, which to attain would mean salvation for all humanity. This is a positively grotesque mixture of nationalpride and religiosity.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 12.

464."England über alles" has in England a very solid meaning, as compared with our quite ideally conceived "Deutschland über alles." An immense self-assurance, partly reposing on the notion of being in a special sense God's chosen people, gives to these claims a certain inward foundation. In the consciousness of an alleged superiority of moral Kultur, the English aspire to rule the world.—Prof. R. Seeberg, D.R.S.Z., No. 15, p. 28.

465.Alone among Kultur-peoples, the English know only themselves, and regard all others, without exception, as foreign, inferior creatures, towards whom Nature decrees that the laws of morality, as between man and man, should not hold good, any more than they hold good towards animals and plants.[44]—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 49.

466.There are, of course, many sincerely pious Christians in England. But eitherthey are impotent as against the prevailing passion, or they are blinded by the illusion of the "chosen people," and have therefore lost all power of sober self-criticism.—Oberlehrer Hermann Schuster, D.K.K.

467.England understands by freedom only club-law, with the club always in her own hand.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 22.

468.Since the Cromwellian rule of the sword, the army is so hated in England that an officer, going on duty from his home to the barracks, has to drive in a closed carriage.—O.A.H. Schmitz, D.W.D., p. 41.

469.I found everywhere in England, during my last visits in 1907 and 1908, a positively terrifying blind hatred for Germany, and impatient longing for a war of annihilation.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 12.

470.England's army of postal officials amounts to 213,000, distributed through 24,245 post offices; the German Empire has50,500 post offices and 305,000 officials. Now we can understand—can we not?—why England envies us.—Pastor M. Hennig, D.K.U.W., p. 39.

471.One finds in England no geniality, no broad, kindly humour, no gaiety. Everything—so far as the outward life is concerned—is hurry, money, noise, ostentation, snobbery, vulgarity, arrogance, discontent, envy.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 60.

472.King Edward VII., while he was Prince of Wales, was often a guest of the London Savage Club, which is so "exclusive" that the Prince could not become a member.—O.A.H. Schmitz, D.W.D., p. 131.

473.Discipline within the parties is maintained with Draconian severity by the so-called "Whips" (i.e.,Peitschenschwingern, lash-wielders); and woe to the member who should dare to express his own opinion!—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 17.

474.The English admit that, owing to the demoralizing influence of Edward VII., they are in a state of religious, social andeconomic decadence, but their illusion as to the incomparable superiority of England prevents them from tracing the evil to its true source, and as some one must be to blame for it, the fault must of course lie with the rapidly climbing Germany.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 34.

475.Every man wears the same trousers, every woman the same hat. I remember once being unable to find in all London a single blue necktie—blue was not the fashion. This would have been unthinkable in Berlin, Paris or Vienna.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 18.

476.Thus science, which to us is a very serious matter, is to the Englishman,like everything else—except money-making!—like, for instance, politics, administration, the care of the poor, &c.,—a private hobby, a sort of sport.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 43.

477.On the day of the Oxford and Cambridge boat race, one walks, in the giant city of London, through literally empty (buchstäblich leere) streets. From the oldestduchess to the youngest chimney sweep, all are seized with the same mad enthusiasm for this event.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 18.

478.[Puritanism leads to] that shrinking from the frank expression of emotions which (for example) explains the fact that cultivated England reads its great poet Shakespeare for the most part in editions in which everything is deleted that could give offence to a sensitive old maid.—Prof. W. Wundt, D.N.I.P., p. 32.

479.At the parliamentary elections [before the war] nothing is spoken of but the hatred for Germany, which animates the speaker and his audience.—K.L.A. Schmidt, D.E.E., p. 10.

480.[British ignorance is] so horrific that a German can scarcely conceive it. Five years ago, in a town of 40,000 inhabitants, it was impossible to find a single man, who, for payment, could read English correctly to an invalid.—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 18.

481.Attention has recently been drawn, by an authoritative writer, to the fact that English biology and the theory of evolution, which have achieved so much celebrity, are in essence nothing but the transference of liberal middle-class views to the processes of life seen in nature.—Prof. W. Sombart, H.U.H., p. 17.

482. Is the noble land of Shakespeare fighting against us? Not at all; for Shakespeare we have long conquered. He has long been more a German than an English poet.—O.A.H. Schmitz, D.W.D., p. 15.

483.About the middle of the last century, England was in a fair way to save herself from decadence through the revivifying virtue of the philosophico-ethical influence of Germany.—Prof. A. Schröer, Z.C.E., p. 69.

484.England is incapable of producing a people's army (Volksarmee).[45]—H.S. Chamberlain, K.A., p. 50.

See also No.3.

492.Belgium, the granary and armoury, is predestined to be the battlefield in the struggle for the Meuse and the Rhine. I ask any general or statesman who has seriously considered the problems of war and politics, whether Belgium can remain neutral in a European war—that is to say, can be respected as neutral any longer than may appear expedient to the Power which feels itself possessed of the best advantage for attack.—Ernst Moritz Arndt(1834), quoted in H.A.H., p. 22.

493.If Sir Edward Grey had urged neutrality [!] upon Belgium, he would have done that country the greatest possible service.—"Germanus," B.U.D.K., p. 36.

494.Where the people of Israel had to demand a passage through foreign territory, they were expressly enjoined first to offer the inhabitants peace (Deuteronomy, xx., 10). Only when the right of transit wasdenied them, was the sword to be drawn and the passage forced. In such a case ... Israel calls the wars in which it has to engage, wars of Jehovah. Its God is indeed a man of war, the Lord of the hosts of Israel. The Scripture even goes so far as to ascribe the subsequent corruption of the people to the fact that it did not completely annihilate the inhabitants of the conquered country.[46]—Pastor M. Hennig, D.K.U.W., p. 6.

495.If Belgium takes part in the war, it must be wiped off the map of Europe.[47]—R. Theuden, W.M.K.B., v., p. 10.

496.How our adversaries understood neutrality is most strikingly summed up in the following passage from the Paris paperLe National, which appeared as early as November 16, 1834 [!] "Le jour viendra ou ... la neutralité de la Belgique, en cas de guerre européenne, disparaitra devant le vœu du peuple beige.... La Belgique se rangera naturellement du côté de la France!"—Prof. C. Borchling, D.B.P., p. 5.

497.A Belgian journalist who had ventured into Liège writes:—"The Germans behave quietly. What they require they pay for in ready money. The pigeons which nest in the Place St. Lambert have a corner of the place where they are fed. The Germans have respected this corner, though they have occupied the rest of the place."—Pastor D.M. Hennig, D.K.U.W., p. 91.

498.See what the war has laid bare in others! What have we learnt of the soul of Belgium? Has it not revealed itself as the soul of cowardice and assassination? They have no moral forces within them; thereforethey resort to the torch and the dagger.—Prof. U.V. Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, R., i., p. 6.

499.The fate that Belgium has called down upon herself is hard for the individual, but not too hard for this political structure (Staatsgebilde), for the destinies of the immortal great nations stand so high that they cannot but have the right, in case of need, to stride over existences that cannot defend themselves, but live, as parasites, upon the rivalries of the great.—Prof. H. Oncken, S.M., September, 1914, p. 819.

500.Our Chancellor has, with the scrupulous conscientiousness peculiar to him, admitted that we were guilty of a certain wrong [towards Belgium]. Here I cannot follow him.... When David, in the pinch of necessity, took the shew-bread from the table of the Lord, he was absolutely in the right; for at that moment the letter of the law no longer existed.—Prof. A.V. Harnack, I.M., 1st October, 1914, p. 23.

501.We were in the position of a man who, being attacked from two sides, has tocarry on a furious fight for life, and cannot concern himself overmuch as to whether one or two flowers are trodden down in his neighbour's garden.—Prof. Dr. W. Dibelius, W.W.E., p. 5.

[38]If this does not mean that England was an accessory before the fact to the murder of the Archduke, whatdoesit mean? The passage is quoted with approval by Dr. Prockosch.Englische Politik und englischer Volksgeist, p. 34.

[39]This clergyman's pamphlet, of 24 pp., is one uninterrupted torrent of abuse.

[40]Doubtless a punning perversion ofFlugschrift, pamphlet.

[41]It would be easy to cite 501 repetitions of this dogma in almost the same words.

[42]Otherwise—horror of horrors!—Herr Chamberlain himself might not be quite assured of his Germanism.

[43]As to the prevalence of this illusion in Germany, see section "The Chosen People and its Mission," p. 28; also Introduction, p. xxi.

[44]Repeated, in other words, again and again by this author.

[45]Written 9th October, 1914.

[46]It is only fair to state that the writer does not apply this doctrine directly to the case of Belgium; but he cannot but have had it in mind. Here is the passage from Deuteronomy: "When thou drawest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall become tributary unto thee, and shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then shalt thou besiege it. And when the Lord thy God delivereth it into thine hand, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take for a prey unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee."

[47]As to the date of this utterance, see Index of Books.

Where titles are given in English only, references are to the English editions of the works in question

A.U.K."Amicus Patriæ": Armenien und Kreta. Eine Lebensfrage für Deutschland. 1896. (Armenia and Crete. A Vital Question for Germany.)B.D.V.Ernst Hasse: Die Besiedelung des deutschen Volksbodens. 1905. (The Colonization of the German Folk-Territory.)B.G.E.Friedrich Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil.B.I.Gerhart v. Schulze-Gaevernitz: Der britische Imperialismus im 19 Jahrhundert. (British Imperialism in the 19th Century.)B.R.K.Friedrich Keutgen: Britische Reichsprobleme und der Krieg. 1914. (British Imperial Problems and the War.)B.U.D.K."Germanus": Britannien und der Krieg. 1914. (Britain and the War.)D.A.P.Graf Ernst v. Reventlow: Deutschlands auswärtige Politik. 1914. (Germany's Foreign Policy.)D.B.B.Deutschland bei Beginn des 20sten Jahrhunderts, von einem Deutschen. 1900. (Germany at the Beginning of the 20th Century, by a German.)D.B.P.Conrad Borchling: Das belgische Problem. 1914. (The Belgian Problem.)D.C.Otfried Nippold: Der deutsche Chauvinismus. 1913. (German Chauvinism.)D.D.D.K.Karl Engelbrecht: Der Deutsche und dieser Krieg. 1914-15. (The German and this War.)D.D.E.Friedrich Meinecke: Die deutsche Erhebung von 1914. 1914. (The German Uprising of 1914.)D.D.M.Wilhelm v. Blume: Der deutsche Militarismus. 1915. (German Militarism.)D.E.E.Karl L.A. Schmidt: Das Ende Englands. n.d. [1914]. (The End of England.)D.E.S.E.Max Stirner: Der Einzige und sein Eigentum. (The Individual and his Property.)D.G.Ernst Hasse: Deutsche Grenzpolitik. 1906. (German Frontier Policy.)D.I.W.Deutschland in Waffen.... (Germany under Arms.) [With a preface and article by the Crown Prince.]D.K.K.Der Krieg und die christlich-deutsche Kultur. 1915. (The War and Christian-German Kultur.)D.K.U.S.Gottfried Traube: Der Krieg und die Seele. 1914. (The War and the Soul.)D.K.U.W.Martin Hennig: Der Krieg und Wir. 1914. (The War and We.)D.N.I.P.Wilhelm Wundt: Die Nationen und ihre Philosophie. 1915. (The Nations and their Philosophy.)D.R.Julius v. Hartmann: Militärische Notwendigkeit und Humanität, in "Deutsche Rundschau," Vols. XIII. and XIV. 1877-78. (Military Necessity and Humanity.)D.R.S.Z.Deutsche Reden in schwerer Zeit. (German Speeches in Difficult Days.) [A series of pamphlets by the Professors of Berlin University and a few others.] 1914-15.D.S.Paul de Lagarde: Deutsche Schriften. 4th ed. 1903. (German Writings.)D.S.E.S.D.Bernhard Lösche: Du stolzes England, schäme dich! 1914. (Thou proud England, shame on thee!)D.U.F.Friedrich Naumann: Deutschland und Frankreich. 1914. (Germany and France.)D.W.D.Oskar A.H. Schmitz: Das wirkliche Deutschland: die Wiedergeburt durch den Krieg. 1915. (The real Germany: the Regeneration through the War.)D.W.E.Edmund v. Heyking: Das wirkliche England. 1914. (The real England.)D.Z.Houston Stewart Chamberlain: Die Zuversicht. 1915. Dated 25th May. (Confidence.)E.B.Das Englandbuch der Täglichen Rundschau. 1915. (The England-book of the Tägliche Rundschau newspaper.)E.M.S.Franz v. Liszt: Ein mitteleuropäischer Staatenverband. 1914. (A Middle-European League of States.)E.P.D.Joseph Ludwig Reimer: Ein Pangermanisches Deutschland. 1905. (A Pan-German Germany.)E.S.S.H.Ein Hamburger Kaufmann: Die englische Seeräuber und sein Handelskrieg. 1914. (A Hamburg Merchant: The English Pirates and their Trade-War.)E.S.V.Kurd v. Strantz: Ein starkes Volk—Ein starkes Heer. 1914. (A Strong People—A Strong Army.) [Published shortly before the war.]E.U.W.Jakob Reisser: England und Wir, 1914. (England and We.)E.W.Ernst Haeckel: Ewigkeit: Weltkriegsgedanken. 1915. (Eternity: Thoughts on the World-War.)G.D.Otto Richard Tannenberg; Gross-Deutschland. 1911. (Great Germany.)G.D.W.Chr. Ludw. Poehlmann: Das Gute des Weltkrieges. 1914. (The Good of the World-War.)G.M.Friedrich Nietzsche: A Genealogy of Morals.G.N.W.Friedrich v. Bernhardi: Germany and the Next War. Ed. 1914. [First published, 1912.]G.U.M.Grossdeutschland und Mitteleuropa um das Jahr 1950, von einem Alldeutschen. 1895. (Great-Germany and Middle-Europe in 1950. By a Pan-German.)G.W.B.The German War-Book. Translation by J.M. Morgan, M.A. 1915.G.Z.K.Hans v. Wolzogen: Gedanken zur Kriegszeit. 1915. (Thoughts in War-Time.)H.A.H.J.P. Bang: Hurrah and Halleluiah. 1916.H.D.F.Alfred H. Fried: Handbuch der Friedensbewegung. 1911. (Handbook of the Peace Movement.)H.T.H.Friedrich Nietzsche: Human, All-Too Human.H.U.H.Werner Sombart: Händler und Helden. 1915. (Hucksters and Heroes.)I.M.Internationale Monatschrift für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Technik. (International Monthly for Science, Art and Technology.)J.W.Friedrich Nietzsche: The Joyous Wisdom.K.Klaus Wagner: Krieg. 1906. (War.)K.A.Houston Stewart Chamberlain: Kriegsaufsätze. 1914. (War Essays.)O.U.W.Albrecht Wirth: Orient und Weltpolitik. 1913. (The East and World-Politics.)P.Heinrich v. Treitschke: Politics. Ed. 1916. [First published, 1899.]P.G.Ernst v. Lasaulx: Philosophic der Geschichte. 1856. (Philosophy of History.)P.I.Houston Stewart Chamberlain: Politische Ideale. 1916. (Political Ideals.)P.K.U.K.Gustav E. Pazaurek: Patriotismus, Kunst und Kunsthandwerk. 1914. (Patriotism, Art, and Art-Handicraft.)R.Ulrich v. Wilamowitz-Möllendorf: Reden. Four parts: Pt. i., Zwei Reden. 1914. Pts. ii., iii., and iv., Reden aus der Kriegszeit. 1915. (Two Speeches, and Speeches in War-Time.)R.D.Friedrich Lange: Reines Deutschtum, 5th Ed. 1904. (Pure Germanism.)S.I.U.Ludwik Gumplowicz: Socialphilosophie im Umriss. 1910. (Social Philosophy in Outline.)S.M.Süddeutsche Monatsheft. (South German Monthly.)T.O.D.Albrecht Wirth: Türkei, Oesterreich, Deutschland. 1912. (Turkey, Austria, Germany.)U.A.P.Albrecht Wirth: Unsere äussere Politik. 1912. (Our External Policy.)V.G.D.K.Georg Misch: Vom Geist des Krieges und des deutschen Volkes Barbarei. 1914. (Of the Spirit of the War, and the Barbarism of the German People.)V.K.K. v. Clausewitz: Vom Kriege. Ed. 1867. (On War.) [First Published, 1832.]V.U.W.Albrecht Wirth: Volkstum und Weltmacht in der Geschichte. 2nd Ed. 1904. (National Spirit and World-Power in History.)W.B.Jakob Burckhardt: Weltgeschichtliche Betrachtungen. 1905. (World-Historic Reflections.)W.B.D.G.Rudolf Eucken: Die weltgeschichtliche Bedeutung des deutschen Geistes. 1914. (The World-Historic Significance of the German Spirit.)W.D.Fritz Bley: Die Weltstellung des Deutschtums. 1897. (The World-Position of Germanism.)W.D.K.Paul Rohrbach: Warum es der deutsche Krieg ist! 1914. (Why it is the German War!)W.D.U.S.R. Jannasch: Weshalb die Deutschen im Auslande unbeliebt sind. 1915. (Why the Germans are unloved in Foreign Parts.)W.I.K.Ernst Hasse: Weltpolitik, Imperialismus und Kolonialpolitik. 1906. (World-Politics, Imperialism, and Colonial Politics.)W.I.K.W.Daniel Frymann: Wenn ich der Kaiser wäre. 5th Ed. 1914. (If I were the Kaiser.)W.K.B.M.Ein Deutscher: Was uns der Krieg bringen muss. n.d. [?1914] (What the War must bring us.)W.L.K.D.Otto Siemens: Wie lange kann der Krieg dauern? n.d. [?1914] (How long can the War last?)W.M.K.B.Rudolf Theuden: Was muss uns der Krieg bringen? 1914. Dated August, 1914, but written before it was known that either Belgium or England would be involved in the War. (What must the War bring us?)W.U.G.P. Heinsick: Der Weltkrieg, seine Ursachen und Gründe. n.d. (The World-War, its Causes and Reasons.)W.U.W.Karl A. Kuhn: Die wahren Ursachen des Weltkrieges. 1914. (The True Causes of the World-War.)W.W.E.W. Dibelius: Was will England? 1914. (What does England want?)W.W.R.Paul Rohrbach: Was will Russland? 1914. (What does Russia want?)W.W.S.G.Adolf v. Harnack: Was wir schon gewonnen haben und was wir noch gewinnen müssen. 1914. (What we have already won, and what we have yet to win.)W.W.S.M.Willy Helm: Warum wir siegen müssen. 1915. (Why we must win.)Z.Friedrich Nietzsche: Thus spake Zarathustra.Z.C.E.E.Arnold Schröer: Zur Characterisierung der Engländer. n.d. (English Characteristics.)Z.D.V.Ernst Hasse: Die Zukunft des deutschen Volkstums. 1908. (The Future of the German National Spirit.)

Back to Index Next