Chapter 11

'TO LADY BYRON, CARE OF THE HON. MRS. LEIGH, LONDON'Pisa,Nov.17, 1821.'I have to acknowledge the receipt of "Ada's hair," which is very soft and pretty, and nearly as dark already as mine was at twelve years old, if I may judge from what I recollect of some in Augusta's possession, taken at that age. But it didn't curl—perhaps from its being let grow.'I also thank you for the inscription of the date and name; and I will tell you why: I believe that they are the only two or three words of your handwriting in my possession. For your letters I returned; and except the two words, or rather the one word, "Household," written twice in an old account book, I have no other. I burnt your last note, for two reasons: firstly, it was written in a style not very agreeable; and, secondly, I wished to take your word without documents, which are the worldly resources of suspicious people.'I suppose that this note will reach you somewhere about Ada's birthday—the 10th of December, I believe. She will then be six: so that, in about twelve more, I shall have some chance of meeting her; perhaps sooner, if I am obliged to go to England by business or otherwise. Recollect, however, one thing, either in distance or nearness—every day which keeps us asunder should, after so long a period, rather soften our mutual feelings; which must always have one rallying point as long as our child exists, which, I presume, we both hope will be long after either of her parents.'The time which has elapsed since the separation has been considerably more than the whole brief period of our union, and the not much longer one of our prior acquaintance. We both made a bitter mistake; but now it is over, and irrevocably so. For at thirty-three on my part, and few years less on yours, though it is no very extended period of life, still it is one when the habits and thought aregenerally so formed as to admit of no modification; and, as we could not agree when younger, we should with difficulty do so now.'I say all this, because I own to you, that notwithstanding everything, I considered our reunion as not impossible for more than a year after the separation; but then I gave up the hope entirely and for ever. But this very impossibility of reunion seems to me at least a reason why, on all the few points of discussion which can arise between us, we should preserve the courtesies of life, and as much of its kindness as people who are never to meet may preserve,—perhaps more easily than nearer connections. For my own part, I am violent, but not malignant; for only fresh provocations can awaken my resentments. To you, who are colder and more concentrated, I would just hint, that you may sometimes mistake the depth of a cold anger for dignity, and a worse feeling for duty. I assure you that I bear younow(whatever I may have done) no resentment whatever. Remember, that,if you have injured mein aught, this forgiveness is something; and that, if I haveinjured you, it is something more still, if it be true, as the moralists say, that the most offending are the least forgiving.'Whether the offence has been solely on my side, or reciprocal, or on yours chiefly, I have ceased to reflect upon any but two things; viz., that you are the mother of my child, and that we shall never meet again. I think, if you also consider the two corresponding points with reference to myself, it will be better for all three.'Yours ever,'Noel Byron.'

'TO LADY BYRON, CARE OF THE HON. MRS. LEIGH, LONDON

'Pisa,Nov.17, 1821.

'I have to acknowledge the receipt of "Ada's hair," which is very soft and pretty, and nearly as dark already as mine was at twelve years old, if I may judge from what I recollect of some in Augusta's possession, taken at that age. But it didn't curl—perhaps from its being let grow.

'I also thank you for the inscription of the date and name; and I will tell you why: I believe that they are the only two or three words of your handwriting in my possession. For your letters I returned; and except the two words, or rather the one word, "Household," written twice in an old account book, I have no other. I burnt your last note, for two reasons: firstly, it was written in a style not very agreeable; and, secondly, I wished to take your word without documents, which are the worldly resources of suspicious people.

'I suppose that this note will reach you somewhere about Ada's birthday—the 10th of December, I believe. She will then be six: so that, in about twelve more, I shall have some chance of meeting her; perhaps sooner, if I am obliged to go to England by business or otherwise. Recollect, however, one thing, either in distance or nearness—every day which keeps us asunder should, after so long a period, rather soften our mutual feelings; which must always have one rallying point as long as our child exists, which, I presume, we both hope will be long after either of her parents.

'The time which has elapsed since the separation has been considerably more than the whole brief period of our union, and the not much longer one of our prior acquaintance. We both made a bitter mistake; but now it is over, and irrevocably so. For at thirty-three on my part, and few years less on yours, though it is no very extended period of life, still it is one when the habits and thought aregenerally so formed as to admit of no modification; and, as we could not agree when younger, we should with difficulty do so now.

'I say all this, because I own to you, that notwithstanding everything, I considered our reunion as not impossible for more than a year after the separation; but then I gave up the hope entirely and for ever. But this very impossibility of reunion seems to me at least a reason why, on all the few points of discussion which can arise between us, we should preserve the courtesies of life, and as much of its kindness as people who are never to meet may preserve,—perhaps more easily than nearer connections. For my own part, I am violent, but not malignant; for only fresh provocations can awaken my resentments. To you, who are colder and more concentrated, I would just hint, that you may sometimes mistake the depth of a cold anger for dignity, and a worse feeling for duty. I assure you that I bear younow(whatever I may have done) no resentment whatever. Remember, that,if you have injured mein aught, this forgiveness is something; and that, if I haveinjured you, it is something more still, if it be true, as the moralists say, that the most offending are the least forgiving.

'Whether the offence has been solely on my side, or reciprocal, or on yours chiefly, I have ceased to reflect upon any but two things; viz., that you are the mother of my child, and that we shall never meet again. I think, if you also consider the two corresponding points with reference to myself, it will be better for all three.

'Yours ever,

'Noel Byron.'

The artless Thomas Moore introduces this letter in the 'Life,' with the remark,—

'There are few, I should think, of my readers, who will not agree with me in pronouncing, that, if the author of the following letter had notrighton his side, he had at least most of those good feelings which are found in general to accompany it.'

The reader is requested to take notice of the important admission, thatthe letter was never sent to Lady Byron at all. It was, in fact, neverintendedfor her, but was a nice little dramatic performance, composed simply with the view of acting on the sympathies of Lady Blessington and Byron's numerous female admirers; and the reader will agree with us, we think, that, in this point of view, it was very neatly done, and deserves immortality as a work of high art. For six years he had been plunged into every kind of vice and excess, pleading his shattered domestic joys, and his wife's obdurate heart, as the apology and theimpelling cause; filling the air with his shrieks and complaints concerning the slander which pursued him, while he filled letters to his confidential correspondents with records of new mistresses. During all these years, the silence of Lady Byron was unbroken; though Lord Byron not only drew in private on the sympathies of his female admirers, but employed his talents and position as an author in holding her up to contempt and ridicule before thousands of readers. We shall quote at length his side of the story, which he published in the First Canto of 'Don Juan,' that the reader may see how much reason he had for assuming the injured tone which he did in the letter to Lady Byron quoted above. That letter never was sent to her; and the unmanly and indecent caricature of her, and the indelicate exposure of the whole story on his own side, which we are about to quote, were the only communications that could have reached her solitude.

In the following verses, Lady Byron is represented as Donna Inez, and Lord Byron as Don José; but the incidents and allusions were so very pointed, that nobody for a moment doubted whose history the poet was narrating.

'His mother was a learned lady, famedFor every branch of every science knownIn every Christian language ever named,With virtues equalled by her wit alone:She made the cleverest people quite ashamed;And even the good with inward envy groaned,Finding themselves so very much exceededIn their own way by all the things that she did.

Save that her duty both to man and GodRequired this conduct; which seemed very odd.She kept a journal where his faults were noted,And opened certain trunks of books and letters,(All which might, if occasion served, be quoted);And then she had all Seville for abettors,Besides her good old grandmother (who doted):The hearers of her case become repeaters,Then advocates, inquisitors, and judges,—Some for amusement, others for old grudges.And then this best and meekest woman boreWith such serenity her husband's woes!Just as the Spartan ladies did of yore,Who saw their spouses killed, and nobly choseNever to say a word about them more.Calmly she heard each calumny that rose,And sawhisagonies with such sublimity,That all the world exclaimed, "What magnanimity!"'

Save that her duty both to man and GodRequired this conduct; which seemed very odd.

She kept a journal where his faults were noted,And opened certain trunks of books and letters,(All which might, if occasion served, be quoted);And then she had all Seville for abettors,Besides her good old grandmother (who doted):The hearers of her case become repeaters,Then advocates, inquisitors, and judges,—Some for amusement, others for old grudges.

And then this best and meekest woman boreWith such serenity her husband's woes!Just as the Spartan ladies did of yore,Who saw their spouses killed, and nobly choseNever to say a word about them more.Calmly she heard each calumny that rose,And sawhisagonies with such sublimity,That all the world exclaimed, "What magnanimity!"'

This is the longest and most elaborate version of his own story that Byron ever published; but he busied himself with many others, projecting at one time a Spanish romance, in which the same story is related in the same transparent manner: but this he was dissuaded from printing. The booksellers, however, made a good speculation in publishing what they called his domestic poems; that is, poems bearing more or less relation to this subject.

Every person with whom he became acquainted with any degree of intimacy was made familiar with his side of the story. Moore's Biography is from first to last, in its representations, founded upon Byron's communicativeness, and Lady Byron's silence; and the world at last settled down to believing that the account so often repeated, and never contradicted, must be substantially a true one.

The true history of Lord and Lady Byron has long been perfectly understood in many circles in England; but the facts were of a nature that could not be made public. While there was a young daughter living whose future might be prejudiced by its recital, and while there were other persons on whom the disclosure of the real truth would have been crushing as an avalanche, Lady Byron's only course was the perfect silence in which she took refuge, and those sublime works of charity and mercy to which she consecrated her blighted early life.

But the time is now come when the truth may be told. All the actors in the scene have disappeared from the stage of mortal existence, and passed, let us have faith to hope, into a world where they would desire to expiate their faults by a late publication of the truth.

No person in England, we think, would as yet take the responsibility of relating the true history which is to clear Lady Byron's memory; but, by a singular concurrence of circumstances, all the facts of the case, in the most undeniable and authentic form, were at one time placed in the hands of the writer of this sketch, with authority to make such use of them as she should judge best. Had this melancholy history been allowed to sleep, no public use would have been made of them; but the appearance of a popular attack on the character of Lady Byron calls for a vindication, and the true story of her married life will therefore now be related.

Lord Byron has described in one of his letters the impression leftupon his mind by a young person whom he met one evening in society, and who attracted his attention by the simplicity of her dress, and a certain air of singular purity and calmness with which she surveyed the scene around her.

On inquiry, he was told that this young person was Miss Milbanke, an only child, and one of the largest heiresses in England.

Lord Byron was fond of idealising his experiences in poetry; and the friends of Lady Byron had no difficulty in recognising the portrait of Lady Byron, as she appeared at this time of her life, in his exquisite description of Aurora Raby:—

'There wasIndeed a certain fair and fairy one,Of the best class, and better than her class,—Aurora Raby, a young star who shoneO'er life, too sweet an image for such glass;A lovely being scarcely formed or moulded;A rose with all its sweetest leaves yet folded.

Early in years, and yet more infantineIn figure, she had something of sublimeIn eyes which sadly shone as seraphs' shine;All youth, but with an aspect beyond time;Radiant and grave, as pitying man's decline;Mournful, but mournful of another's crime,She looked as if she sat by Eden's door,And grieved for those who could return no more.

She gazed upon a world she scarcely knew,As seeking not to know it; silent, lone,As grows a flower, thus quietly she grew,And kept her heart serene within its zone.There was awe in the homage which she drew;Her spirit seemed as seated on a throne,Apart from the surrounding world, and strongIn its own strength,—most strange in one so young!'

Some idea of the course which their acquaintance took, and of the manner in which he was piqued into thinking of her, is given in a stanza or two:—

'The dashing and proud air of AdelineImposed not upon her: she saw her blazeMuch as she would have seen a glowworm shine;Then turned unto the stars for loftier rays.Juan was something she could not divine,Being no sibyl in the new world's ways;Yet she was nothing dazzled by the meteor,Because she did not pin her faith on feature.His fame too (for he had that kind of fameWhich sometimes plays the deuce with womankind,—A heterogeneous mass of glorious blame,Half virtues and whole vices being combined;Faults which attract because they are not tame;Follies tricked out so brightly that they blind),—These seals upon her wax made no impression,Such was her coldness or her self-possession.Aurora sat with that indifferenceWhich piques apreuxchevalier,—as it ought.Of all offences, that's the worst offenceWhich seems to hint you are not worth a thought.

His fame too (for he had that kind of fameWhich sometimes plays the deuce with womankind,—A heterogeneous mass of glorious blame,Half virtues and whole vices being combined;Faults which attract because they are not tame;Follies tricked out so brightly that they blind),—These seals upon her wax made no impression,Such was her coldness or her self-possession.

Aurora sat with that indifferenceWhich piques apreuxchevalier,—as it ought.Of all offences, that's the worst offenceWhich seems to hint you are not worth a thought.

To his gay nothings, nothing was replied,Or something which was nothing, as urbanityRequired. Aurora scarcely looked aside,Nor even smiled enough for any vanity.The Devil was in the girl! Could it be pride,Or modesty, or absence, or inanity?

Juan was drawn thus into some attentions,Slight but select, and just enough to express,To females of perspicuous comprehensions,That he would rather make them more than less.Aurora at the last (so history mentions,Though probably much less a fact than guess)So far relaxed her thoughts from their sweet prisonAs once or twice to smile, if not to listen.

But Juan had a sort of winning way,A proud humility, if such there be,Which showed such deference to what females say,As if each charming word were a decree.His tact, too, tempered him from grave to gay,And taught him when to be reserved or free.He had the art of drawing people out,Without their seeing what he was about.Aurora, who in her indifference,Confounded him in common with the crowdOf flatterers, though she deemed he had more senseThan whispering foplings or than witlings loud,Commenced (from such slight things will great commence)To feel that flattery which attracts the proud,Rather by deference than compliment,And wins even by a delicate dissent.And then he had good looks: that point was carriedNem. con.amongst the women.

Aurora, who in her indifference,Confounded him in common with the crowdOf flatterers, though she deemed he had more senseThan whispering foplings or than witlings loud,Commenced (from such slight things will great commence)To feel that flattery which attracts the proud,Rather by deference than compliment,And wins even by a delicate dissent.

And then he had good looks: that point was carriedNem. con.amongst the women.

Now, though we know of old that looks deceive,And always have done, somehow these good looks,Make more impression than the best of books.Aurora, who looked more on books than faces,Was very young, although so very sage:Admiring more Minerva than the Graces,Especially upon a printed page.But Virtue's self, with all her tightest laces,Has not the natural stays of strict old age;And Socrates, that model of all duty,Owned to a penchant, though discreet for beauty.'

Now, though we know of old that looks deceive,And always have done, somehow these good looks,Make more impression than the best of books.

Aurora, who looked more on books than faces,Was very young, although so very sage:Admiring more Minerva than the Graces,Especially upon a printed page.But Virtue's self, with all her tightest laces,Has not the natural stays of strict old age;And Socrates, that model of all duty,Owned to a penchant, though discreet for beauty.'

The presence of this high-minded, thoughtful, unworldly woman is described through two cantos of the wild, rattling 'Don Juan,' in a manner that shows how deeply the poet was capable of being affected by such an appeal to his higher nature.

For instance, when Don Juan sits silent and thoughtful amid a circle of persons who are talking scandal, the poet says,—

''Tis true, he saw Aurora look as thoughShe approved his silence: she perhaps mistookIts motive for that charity we owe,But seldom pay, the absent.

He gained esteem where it was worth the most;And certainly Aurora had renewedIn him some feelings he had lately lostOr hardened,—feelings which, perhaps ideal,Are so divine that I must deem them real:—The love of higher things and better days;The unbounded hope and heavenly ignoranceOf what is called the world and the world's ways;The moments when we gather from a glanceMore joy than from all future pride or praise,Which kindled manhood, but can ne'er entranceThe heart in an existence of its ownOf which another's bosom is the zone.And full of sentiments sublime as billowsHeaving between this world and worlds beyond,Don Juan, when the midnight hour of pillowsArrived, retired to his.'...

The love of higher things and better days;The unbounded hope and heavenly ignoranceOf what is called the world and the world's ways;The moments when we gather from a glance

More joy than from all future pride or praise,Which kindled manhood, but can ne'er entranceThe heart in an existence of its ownOf which another's bosom is the zone.

And full of sentiments sublime as billowsHeaving between this world and worlds beyond,Don Juan, when the midnight hour of pillowsArrived, retired to his.'...

In all these descriptions of a spiritual unworldly nature acting on the spiritual and unworldly part of his own nature, every one who ever knew Lady Byron intimately must have recognised the model from which he drew, and the experience from which he spoke, even though nothing was further from his mind than to pay this tribute to the woman he had injured, and though before these lines, which showed how truly he knew her real character, had come one stanza of ribald, vulgar caricature, designed as a slight to her:—

'There was Miss Millpond, smooth as summer's seaThat usual paragon, an only daughter,Who seemed the cream of equanimity'Till skimmed; and then there was some milk and water;With a slight shade of blue, too, it might be,Beneath the surface: but what did it matter?Love's riotous; but marriage should have quiet,And, being consumptive, live on a milk diet.'

The result of Byron's intimacy with Miss Milbanke and the enkindling of his nobler feelings was an offer of marriage, which she, though at the time deeply interested in him, declined with many expressions of friendship and interest. In fact, she already loved him, but had that doubt of her power to be to him all that a wife should be which would be likely to arise in a mind so sensitively constituted and so unworldly. They, however, continued a correspondence as friends; on her part, the interest continually increased; on his, the transient rise of better feelings was choked and overgrown by the thorns of base unworthy passions.

From the height at which he might have been happy as the husband of a noble woman, he fell into the depths of a secret adulterous intrigue with a blood relation, so near in consanguinity, that discovery must have been utter ruin and expulsion from civilised society.

From henceforth, this damning guilty secret became the ruling forcein his life; holding him with a morbid fascination, yet filling him with remorse and anguish, and insane dread of detection. Two years after his refusal by Miss Milbanke, his various friends, seeing that for some cause he was wretched, pressed marriage upon him.

Marriage has often been represented as the proper goal and terminus of a wild and dissipated career; and it has been supposed to be the appointed mission of good women to receive wandering prodigals, with all the rags and disgraces of their old life upon them, and put rings on their hands, and shoes on their feet, and introduce them, clothed and in their right minds, to an honourable career in society.

Marriage was, therefore, universally recommended to Lord Byron by his numerous friends and well-wishers; and so he determined to marry, and, in an hour of reckless desperation, sat down and wrote proposals to two ladies. One was declined: the other, which was accepted, was to Miss Milbanke. The world knows well that he had the gift of expression, and will not be surprised that he wrote a very beautiful letter, and that the woman who had already learned to love him fell at once into the snare.

Her answer was a frank, outspoken avowal of her love for him, giving herself to him heart and hand. The good in Lord Byron was not so utterly obliterated that he could receive such a letter without emotion, or practise such unfairness on a loving, trusting heart without pangs of remorse. He had sent the letter in mere recklessness; he had not seriously expected to be accepted; and the discovery of the treasure of affection which he had secured was like a vision of lost heaven to a soul in hell.

But, nevertheless, in his letters written about the engagement, there are sufficient evidences that his self-love was flattered at the preference accorded him by so superior a woman, and one who had been so much sought. He mentions with an air of complacency that she has employed the last two years in refusing five or six of his acquaintance; that he had no idea she loved him, admitting that it was an old attachment on his part. He dwells on her virtues with a sort of pride of ownership. There is a sort of childish levity about the frankness of these letters, very characteristic of the man who skimmed over the deepest abysses with the lightest jests. Before the world, and to his intimates, he was acting the part of the successfulfiancé, conscious all the while of the deadly secret that lay cold at the bottom of his heart.

When he went to visit Miss Milbanke's parents as her accepted lover she was struck with his manner and appearance: she saw him moody and gloomy, evidently wrestling with dark and desperate thoughts, andanything but what a happy and accepted lover should be. She sought an interview with him alone, and told him that she had observed that he was not happy in the engagement; and magnanimously added, that, if on review, he found he had been mistaken in the nature of his feelings, she would immediately release him, and they should remain only friends.

Overcome with the conflict of his feelings, Lord Byron fainted away. Miss Milbanke was convinced that his heart must really be deeply involved in an attachment with reference to which he showed such strength of emotion, and she spoke no more of a dissolution of the engagement.

There is no reason to doubt that Byron was, as he relates in his 'Dream,' profoundly agonized and agitated when he stood before God's altar with the trusting young creature whom he was leading to a fate so awfully tragic; yet it was not the memory of Mary Chaworth, but another guiltier and more damning memory, that overshadowed that hour.

The moment the carriage-doors were shut upon the bridegroom and the bride, the paroxysm of remorse and despair—unrepentant remorse and angry despair—broke forth upon her gentle head:—

'You might have saved me from this, madam! You had all in your own power when I offered myself to you first. Then you might have made me what you pleased; but now you will find that you have married adevil!'

In Miss Martineau's Sketches, recently published, is an account of the termination of this wedding-journey, which brought them to one of Lady Byron's ancestral country seats, where they were to spend the honeymoon.

Miss Martineau says,—

'At the altar she did not know that she was a sacrifice; but before sunset of that winter day she knew it, if a judgment may be formed from her face, and attitude of despair, when she alighted from the carriage on the afternoon of her marriage-day. It was not the traces of tears which won the sympathy of the old butler who stood at the open door. The bridegroom jumped out of the carriage and walked away. The bride alighted, and came up the steps alone, with a countenance and frame agonized and listless with evident horror and despair. The old servant longed to offer his arm to the young, lonely creature, as an assurance of sympathy and protection. From this shock she certainly rallied, and soon. The pecuniary difficulties of her new home were exactly what a devoted spirit like hers was fitted to encounter. Her husband bore testimony, after the catastrophe, that a brighterbeing, a more sympathising and agreeable companion, never blessed any man's home. When he afterwards called her cold and mathematical, and over-pious, and so forth, it was when public opinion had gone against him, and when he had discovered that her fidelity and mercy, her silence and magnanimity, might be relied on, so that he was at full liberty to make his part good, as far as she was concerned.

'Silent she was even to her own parents, whose feelings she magnanimously spared. She did not act rashly in leaving him, though she had been most rash in marrying him.'

Not all at once did the full knowledge of the dreadful reality into which she had entered come upon the young wife. She knew vaguely, from the wild avowals of the first hours of their marriage, that there was a dreadful secret of guilt; that Byron's soul was torn with agonies of remorse, and that he had no love to give to her in return for a love which was ready to do and dare all for him. Yet bravely she addressed herself to the task of soothing and pleasing and calming the man whom she had taken 'for better or for worse.'

Young and gifted; with a peculiar air of refined and spiritual beauty; graceful in every movement; possessed of exquisite taste; a perfect companion to his mind in all the higher walks of literary culture; and with that infinite pliability to all his varying, capricious moods which true love alone can give; bearing in her hand a princely fortune, which, with a woman's uncalculating generosity, was thrown at his feet,—there is no wonder that she might feel for a while as if she could enter the lists with the very Devil himself, and fight with a woman's weapons for the heart of her husband.

There are indications scattered through the letters of Lord Byron, which, though brief indeed, showed that his young wife was making every effort to accommodate herself to him, and to give him a cheerful home. One of the poems that he sends to his publisher about this time, he speaks of as being copied by her. He had always the highest regard for her literary judgments and opinions; and this little incident shows that she was already associating herself in a wifely fashion with his aims as an author.

The poem copied by her, however, has a sad meaning, which she afterwards learned to understand only too well:—

'There's not a joy the world can give like that it takes awayWhen the glow of early thought declines in feeling's dull decay:'Tis not on youth's smooth cheek the blush alone that fades so fast;But the tender bloom of heart is gone e'er youth itself be past.Then the few whose spirits float above the wreck of happinessAre driven o'er the shoals of guilt, or ocean of excess:The magnet of their course is gone, or only points in vainThe shore to which their shivered sail shall never stretch again.'

Only a few days before she left him for ever, Lord Byron sent Murray manuscripts, in Lady Byron's handwriting, of the 'Siege of Corinth,' and 'Parisina,' and wrote,—

'I am very glad that the handwriting was a favourable omen of themoraleof the piece: but you must not trust to that; for my copyist would write out anything I desired, in all the ignorance of innocence.'

There were lucid intervals in which Lord Byron felt the charm of his wife's mind, and the strength of her powers. 'Bell, you could be a poet too, if you only thought so,' he would say. There were summer-hours in her stormy life, the memory of which never left her, when Byron was as gentle and tender as he was beautiful; when he seemed to be possessed by a good angel: and then for a little time all the ideal possibilities of his nature stood revealed.

The most dreadful men to live with are those who thus alternate between angel and devil. The buds of hope and love called out by a day or two of sunshine are frozen again and again, till the tree is killed.

But there came an hour of revelation,—an hour when, in a manner which left no kind of room for doubt, Lady Byron saw the full depth of the abyss of infamy which her marriage was expected to cover, and understood that she was expected to be the cloak and the accomplice of this infamy.

Many women would have been utterly crushed by such a disclosure; some would have fled from him immediately, and exposed and denounced the crime. Lady Byron did neither. When all the hope of womanhood died out of her heart, there arose within her, stronger, purer, and brighter, that immortal kind of love such as God feels for the sinner,—the love of which Jesus spoke, and which holds the one wanderer of more account than the ninety and nine that went not astray. She would neither leave her husband nor betray him, nor yet would she for one moment justify his sin; and hence came two years of convulsive struggle, in which sometimes, for a while, the good angel seemed to gain ground, and then the evil one returned with sevenfold vehemence.

Lord Byron argued his case with himself and with her with all the sophistries of his powerful mind. He repudiated Christianity as authority; asserted the right of every human being to follow out what he called 'the impulses of nature.' Subsequently he introduced into one of his dramas the reasoning by which he justified himself in incest.

In the drama of 'Cain,' Adah, the sister and the wife of Cain, thus addresses him:—

'Cain, walk not with this spirit.Bear with what we have borne, and love me: ILove thee.Lucifer.More than thy mother and thy sire?Adah.I do. Is that a sin, too?Lucifer.No, not yet:It one day will be in your children.Adah.What!Must not my daughter love her brother Enoch?Lucifer.Not as thou lovest Cain.Adah.O my God!Shall they not love, and bring forth things that loveOut of their love? Have they not drawn their milkOut of this bosom? Was not he, their father,Born of the same sole womb, in the same hourWith me? Did we not love each other, and,In multiplying our being, multiplyThings which will love each other as we loveThem? And as I love thee, my Cain, go notForth with this spirit: he is not of ours.Lucifer.The sin I speak of is not of my makingAnd cannot be a sin in you, whate'erIt seems in those who will replace ye inMortality.Adah.What is the sin which is notSin in itself? Can circumstance make sinOf virtue? If it doth, we are the slavesOf'—

'Cain, walk not with this spirit.Bear with what we have borne, and love me: ILove thee.

Lucifer.More than thy mother and thy sire?

Adah.I do. Is that a sin, too?

Lucifer.No, not yet:It one day will be in your children.

Adah.What!Must not my daughter love her brother Enoch?

Lucifer.Not as thou lovest Cain.

Adah.O my God!Shall they not love, and bring forth things that loveOut of their love? Have they not drawn their milkOut of this bosom? Was not he, their father,Born of the same sole womb, in the same hourWith me? Did we not love each other, and,In multiplying our being, multiplyThings which will love each other as we loveThem? And as I love thee, my Cain, go notForth with this spirit: he is not of ours.

Lucifer.The sin I speak of is not of my makingAnd cannot be a sin in you, whate'erIt seems in those who will replace ye inMortality.

Adah.What is the sin which is notSin in itself? Can circumstance make sinOf virtue? If it doth, we are the slavesOf'—

Lady Byron, though slight and almost infantine in her bodily presence, had the soul, not only of an angelic woman, but of a strong reasoning man. It was the writer's lot to know her at a period when she formed the personal acquaintance of many of the very first minds of England; but, among all with whom this experience brought her in connection, there was none who impressed her so strongly as Lady Byron. There was an almost supernatural power of moral divination, a grasp of the very highest and most comprehensive things, that made her lightest opinions singularly impressive. No doubt, this result was wrought out in a great degree from the anguish and conflict of these two years, when, with no one to help or counsel her but Almighty God, she wrestled and struggled with fiends of darkness for the redemption of her husband's soul.

She followed him through all his sophistical reasonings with a keener reason. She besought and implored, in the name of his better nature, and by all the glorious things that he was capable of being and doing; and she had just power enough to convulse and shake and agonise, but not power enough to subdue.

One of the first of living writers, in the novel of 'Romola,' has given, in her masterly sketch of the character of Tito, the whole history of the conflict of a woman like Lady Byron with a nature like that of her husband. She has described a being full of fascinations and sweetnesses, full of generosities and of good-natured impulses; a nature that could not bear to give pain, or to see it in others, but entirely destitute of any firm moral principle; she shows how such a being, merely by yielding step by step to the impulses of passion, and disregarding the claims of truth and right, becomes involved in a fatality of evil, in which deceit, crime, and cruelty are a necessity, forcing him to persist in the basest ingratitude to the father who has done all for him, and hard-hearted treachery to the high-minded wife who has given herself to him wholly.

There are few scenes in literature more fearfully tragic than the one between Romola and Tito, when he finally discovers that she knows him fully, and can be deceived by him no more. Some such hour always must come for strong decided natures irrevocably pledged—one to the service of good, and the other to the slavery of evil. The demoniac cried out, 'What have I to do with thee, Jesus of Nazareth? Art thou come to torment me before the time?' The presence of all-pitying purity and love was a torture to the soul possessed by the demon of evil.

These two years in which Lady Byron was with all her soul struggling to bring her husband back to his better self were a series of passionate convulsions.

During this time, such was the disordered and desperate state of his worldly affairs, that there were ten executions for debt levied on their family establishment; and it was Lady Byron's fortune each time which settled the account.

Toward the last, she and her husband saw less and less of each other; and he came more and more decidedly under evil influences, and seemed to acquire a sort of hatred of her.

Lady Byron once said significantly to a friend who spoke of some causeless dislike in another, 'My dear, I have known people to be hated for no other reason than because they impersonated conscience.'

The biographers of Lord Byron, and all his apologists, are careful to narrate how sweet and amiable and obliging he was to everybody whoapproached him; and the saying of Fletcher, his man-servant, that 'anybodycould do anything with my Lord, except my Lady,' has often been quoted.

The reason of all this will now be evident. 'My Lady' was the only one, fully understanding the deep and dreadful secrets of his life, who had the courage resolutely and persistently and inflexibly to plant herself in his way, and insist upon it, that, if he went to destruction, it should be in spite of her best efforts.

He had tried his strength with her fully. The first attempt had been to make her an accomplice by sophistry; by destroying her faith in Christianity, and confusing her sense of right and wrong, to bring her into the ranks of those convenient women who regard the marriage-tie only as a friendly alliance to cover licence on both sides.

When her husband described to her the Continental latitude (the good-humoured marriage, in which complaisant couples mutually agreed to form the cloak for each other's infidelities), and gave her to understand that in this way alone she could have a peaceful and friendly life with him, she answered him simply, 'I am too truly your friend to do this.'

When Lord Byron found that he had to do with one who would not yield, who knew him fully, who could not be blinded and could not be deceived, he determined to rid himself of her altogether.

It was when the state of affairs between herself and her husband seemed darkest and most hopeless, that the only child of this union was born. Lord Byron's treatment of his wife during the sensitive period that preceded the birth of this child, and during her confinement, was marked by paroxysms of unmanly brutality, for which the only possible charity on her part was the supposition of insanity. Moore sheds a significant light on this period, by telling us that, about this time, Byron was often drunk, day after day, with Sheridan. There had been insanity in the family; and this was the plea which Lady Byron's love put in for him. She regarded him as, if not insane, at least so nearly approaching the boundaries of insanity as to be a subject of forbearance and tender pity; and she loved him with that love resembling a mother's, which good wives often feel when they have lost all faith in their husband's principles, and all hopes of their affections. Still, she was in heart and soul his best friend; true to him with a truth which he himself could not shake.

In the verses addressed to his daughter, Lord Byron speaks of her as

'The child of love, though born in bitterness,And nurtured in convulsion.'

A day or two after the birth of this child, Lord Byron came suddenly into Lady Byron's room, and told her that her mother was dead. It was an utter falsehood; but it was only one of the many nameless injuries and cruelties by which he expressed his hatred of her. A short time after her confinement, she was informed by him, in a note, that, as soon as she was able to travel, she must go; that he could not and would not longer have her about him; and, when her child was only five weeks old, he carried this threat of expulsion into effect.

Here we will insert briefly Lady Byron's own account (the only one she ever gave to the public) of this separation. The circumstances under which this brief story was written are affecting.

Lord Byron was dead. The whole account between him and her was closed for ever in this world. Moore's life had been prepared, containing simply and solely Lord Byron's own version of their story. Moore sent this version to Lady Byron, and requested to know if she had any remarks to make upon it. In reply, she sent a brief statement to him,—the first and only one that had come from her during all the years of the separation, and which appears to have mainly for its object the exculpation of her father and mother from the charge, made by the poet, of being the instigators of the separation.

In this letter, she says, with regard to their separation,—

'The facts are, I left London for Kirkby Mallory, the residence of my father and mother, on the 15th of January, 1816.Lord Byron had signified to me in writing, Jan. 6, his absolute desire that I should leave London on the earliest day that I could conveniently fix.It was not safe for me to undertake the fatigue of a journey sooner than the 15th. Previously to my departure, it had been strongly impressed upon my mind that Lord Byron was under the influence of insanity. This opinion was derived, in a great measure, from the communications made me by his nearest relatives and personal attendant, who had more opportunity than myself for observing him during the latter part of my stay in town. It was even represented to me that he was in danger of destroying himself.

'With the concurrence of his family, I had consulted Dr. Baillie as a friend (Jan. 8) respecting the supposed malady. On acquainting him with the state of the case, and with Lord Byron's desire that I should leave London, Dr. Baillie thought that my absence might be advisable as an experiment, assuming the fact of mental derangement; for Dr. Baillie, not having had access to Lord Byron, could not pronounce a positive opinion on that point. He enjoined that, in correspondence with Lord Byron, I should avoid all but light and soothing topics. Under these impressions, I left London, determined to follow the advice given by Dr. Baillie. Whatever might have been the conduct of LordByron toward me from the time of my marriage, yet, supposing him to be in a state of mental alienation, it was not forme, nor for any person of common humanity, to manifest at that moment a sense of injury.'

Nothing more than this letter from Lady Byron is necessary to substantiate the fact, that she did notleaveher husband, butwas drivenfrom him,—driven from him that he might give himself up to the guilty infatuation that was consuming him, without being tortured by her imploring face, and by the silent power of her presence and her prayers.

For a long time before this, she had seen little of him. On the day of her departure, she passed by the door of his room, and stopped to caress his favourite spaniel, which was lying there; and she confessed to a friend the weakness of feeling a willingness even to be something as humble as that poor little creature, might she only be allowed to remain and watch over him. She went into the room where he and the partner of his sins were sitting together, and said, 'Byron, I come to say good-bye,' offering, at the same time, her hand.

Lord Byron put his hands behind him, retreated to the mantel-piece, and, looking on the two that stood there, with a sarcastic smile said, 'When shall we three meet again?' Lady Byron answered, 'In heaven, I trust.' And those were her last words to him on earth.

Now, if the reader wishes to understand the real talents of Lord Byron for deception and dissimulation, let him read, with this story in his mind, the 'Fare thee well,' which he addressed to Lady Byron through the printer:—

Back to Index Next