XXVI.—MECHANOTROPISM: TWINING OF TENDRILS

Effect of direct stimulation on proximal side.Effect of indirect stimulation on distal side.Diminution of turgorIncrease of turgor.Galvanometric negativityGalvanometric positivity.Contraction and concavityExpansion and convexity.When stimulus is strong or long continued, the true excitatory effect isconducted to the distal side, neutralising or reversing the first response.

The diagram which I have already given (Fig. 98) clearly explains the different tropic effects induced by changing the point of application of stimulus. We may thus have stimulus applied at the responding region itself (Direct Stimulation) or at some distance from it (Indirect Stimulation). The final effect will be modified by the conducting power of the tissue.

Type I.—The tissue has little or no power of transverse conduction: stimulus remains localised, the proximal side undergoes contraction, and the distal side expansion. The result is a positive curvature.Type II.—The tissue is transversely conducting. Under strong and long continued stimulation the excitatory impulse reaches the distal side, neutralising or reversing the first effect.

Type I.—The tissue has little or no power of transverse conduction: stimulus remains localised, the proximal side undergoes contraction, and the distal side expansion. The result is a positive curvature.

Type II.—The tissue is transversely conducting. Under strong and long continued stimulation the excitatory impulse reaches the distal side, neutralising or reversing the first effect.

Type I.—The intervening tissue is an indifferent conductor: transmitted positive impulse induces expansion and convexity on the same side, thus giving rise to negative curvature (i.e., away from stimulus).Type II.—Intervening tissue is a fairly good conductor: the effect of positive impulse is over-powered by the predominant excitatory negative impulse, the final result is a concavity and positive curvature, with movement towards the stimulus.

Type I.—The intervening tissue is an indifferent conductor: transmitted positive impulse induces expansion and convexity on the same side, thus giving rise to negative curvature (i.e., away from stimulus).

Type II.—Intervening tissue is a fairly good conductor: the effect of positive impulse is over-powered by the predominant excitatory negative impulse, the final result is a concavity and positive curvature, with movement towards the stimulus.

The following is a tabular statement of the different effects induced by Direct and Indirect stimulation.

TABLE XXV.—SHOWING DIFFERENCE OF EFFECTS INDUCED BY DIRECT AND INDIRECT STIMULATION.

Stimulation.Nature of the tissue.Final effect.Direct (Feeble)Semi-conducting tissue.Positive curvature.Indirect   ""                   "Negative curvature.Direct (Strong)Better conducting tissue.Neutral or negative curvature.Indirect   ""           "                 "Negative followed by positive curvature.

The results of investigations already described, enable us to formulate the general laws of tropic curvature applicable to all forms of stimuli, and to all types of responding organs, pulvinated or growing.

1. (a)DIRECT APPLICATION OF UNILATERAL STIMULUS OF MODERATE INTENSITY, INDUCES A POSITIVE OR CONCAVE CURVATURE, BY THE CONTRACTION OF THE PROXIMAL AND EXPANSION OF THE DISTAL SIDE.(b)UNDER STRONG OR LONG-CONTINUED STIMULATION, THE POSITIVE CURVATURE IS NEUTRALISED OR REVERSED, BY TRANSVERSE CONDUCTION OF EXCITATION; THIS EFFECT IS ACCENTUATED BY THE DIFFERENTIAL EXCITABILITY OF THE TWO SIDES OF THE ORGAN.2. (a)INDIRECT APPLICATION OF UNILATERAL STIMULUS OF FEEBLE INTENSITY INDUCES A NEGATIVE CURVATURE.(b)IN A CONDUCTING TISSUE THE EXCITATORY EFFECT BEING TRANSMITTED UNDER STRONG AND LONG CONTINUED STIMULATION, INDUCES A POSITIVE CURVATURE.

1. (a)DIRECT APPLICATION OF UNILATERAL STIMULUS OF MODERATE INTENSITY, INDUCES A POSITIVE OR CONCAVE CURVATURE, BY THE CONTRACTION OF THE PROXIMAL AND EXPANSION OF THE DISTAL SIDE.

(b)UNDER STRONG OR LONG-CONTINUED STIMULATION, THE POSITIVE CURVATURE IS NEUTRALISED OR REVERSED, BY TRANSVERSE CONDUCTION OF EXCITATION; THIS EFFECT IS ACCENTUATED BY THE DIFFERENTIAL EXCITABILITY OF THE TWO SIDES OF THE ORGAN.

2. (a)INDIRECT APPLICATION OF UNILATERAL STIMULUS OF FEEBLE INTENSITY INDUCES A NEGATIVE CURVATURE.

(b)IN A CONDUCTING TISSUE THE EXCITATORY EFFECT BEING TRANSMITTED UNDER STRONG AND LONG CONTINUED STIMULATION, INDUCES A POSITIVE CURVATURE.

It will thus be seen that the tropic effect is modified by:

(1) the point of application of stimulus,(2) the intensity and duration of stimulus,(3) the conducting power of tissue in the transverse direction,(4) the relative excitabilities of the proximal and distal sides of the organ.

(1) the point of application of stimulus,

(2) the intensity and duration of stimulus,

(3) the conducting power of tissue in the transverse direction,

(4) the relative excitabilities of the proximal and distal sides of the organ.

In the following series of Papers the tropic effects of various forms of stimuli will be studied in detail.

In a semi-conducting tissue Direct stimulation induces a diminution of turgor and contraction, Indirect stimulation inducing the opposite effect of increase of turgor and expansion.

Unilateral stimulation thus induces a positive curvature by the joint effects of contraction at the proximal, and expansion at the distal side.

Under strong and long continued unilateral stimulation, the excitation at the proximal side is transmitted to the distal side. Transverse conduction thus neutralises or reverses the normal positive curvature.

[3]"Plant Response"—p. 519.

[3]"Plant Response"—p. 519.

In response to the stimulus of contact a tendril twines round its support. Certain tendrils are uniformly sensitive on all sides; but in other cases, as in the tendril ofPassiflora, the sensitiveness is greater on the under side. A curvature is induced when this side is rubbed with a splinter of wood, the stimulated under side becoming concave. This movement may be distinguished as a movement ofcurling. There is, as I shall presently show, a response where the under side becomes convex, and the curvature becomes reversed.

As regards perception of mechanical stimulus, Pfeffer discovered tactile pits in the tendrilsCucurbitaceæ. These pits no doubt facilitate sudden deformation of the sensitive protoplasm by frictional contact. No satisfactory explanation has however been offered as regards the physiological machinery of responsive movement. The difficultyof explanation of twining movements is accentuated by a peculiarity in the response of tendrils which is extremely puzzling. This anomaly was observed by Fitting in tendrils which are sensitive on the under side:

"If a small part of the upper side and at the same time the whole of the under side be stimulated, curvature takes place only at the places on the under side which lie opposite to the unstimulated regions of the upper side. Thesensitivenessto contact is thus as well developed on the upper side as on the under side, and the difference between the two sides lies in the fact that while stimulation of the under side induces curvature, stimulation of the upper side inducesno visible result, or simply inhibits curvature on the under side, according to circumstances."[4]

"If a small part of the upper side and at the same time the whole of the under side be stimulated, curvature takes place only at the places on the under side which lie opposite to the unstimulated regions of the upper side. Thesensitivenessto contact is thus as well developed on the upper side as on the under side, and the difference between the two sides lies in the fact that while stimulation of the under side induces curvature, stimulation of the upper side inducesno visible result, or simply inhibits curvature on the under side, according to circumstances."[4]

Here then we have the inexplicable phenomenon of a particular tissue, itself incapable of response, yet arresting the movement in a neighbouring tissue.

The problem before us may be thus stated: Is the movement of the tendril due to certain specific sensibility of the organ, on account of which its reactions are characteristically different from other tropic movements? Or, does the twining of tendril come under the law of tropic curvature that has been established, namely that it is brought about by the contraction of the directly stimulated proximal side, and the expansion of the indirectly stimulated distal side?

I shall now describe my investigations on the effects of direct and indirect stimulus on the growth of tendril; Ihave in this investigation studied the effect not merely of mechanical, but also of other forms of stimuli. I shall also describe the diverse effects induced by mechanical stimulus under different conditions. From the results of these experiments I shall be able to show that the twining of the tendril comes under the general law of tropic curvature; that the curvature results from the contraction of the proximal and expansion of the distal side. Finally I shall be able to offer a satisfactory explanation of the inhibition of response of the tendril by the stimulation of the opposite side of the organ.

Fig. 102.—Diagrammatic representation of indirect and direct stimulation of tendril.

Fig. 102.—Diagrammatic representation of indirect and direct stimulation of tendril.

For this experiment I took a growing tendril ofCucurbitain which the sensitiveness is more or less uniform on all sides. The tendril was suitably mounted on the Balanced Crescograph, which records the variation of the rate of growth induced by immediate and after-effect of stimulus. The specimen is held in a clamp as in the diagram (Fig. 102), the tip being suitably attached to the recording lever. For indirect stimulation feeble shock from an induction coil is applied at the two electric connections below the clamp. Direct stimulus is applied by means of electric connections one above and the other below the clamp.

Fig. 103.—Record by Method of Balance, showing acceleration of growth of tendril (up-curve) induced by indirect stimulation. (Cucurbita.)

Fig. 103.—Record by Method of Balance, showing acceleration of growth of tendril (up-curve) induced by indirect stimulation. (Cucurbita.)

Effect of Indirect Stimulus: Experiment 106.—The growth of the tendril was exactly balanced, and the record became horizontal. Indirect stimulus was next applied below the clamp; this is seen to upset the balance, with the resulting up-curve which indicates a sudden acceleration of growth above the normal. This acceleration took place within ten seconds of the application of stimulus, and persisted for three minutes; after this the normal rate of growth became restored, as seen by the balanced record once more becoming horizontal (Fig. 103).

Effect of Direct Stimulus: Experiment 107.—The incipient contraction induced by direct stimulation is so great that the record obtained by the delicate method of balance cannot be kept within the plate. I, therefore, took the ordinary growth-curve on a moving plate. The first part of the curve represents normal growth; stimulus of feeble electric shock was applied at the highest point of the curve. This is seen (Fig. 104) to induce an immediate contraction and reversal of the curve which persisted for two and half minutes, after which growth was slowly renewed. The most interesting fact regarding the after-effect of stimulus is that the rate of growth became actually enhanced to three times the normal. This is clearly seen in the record (upper half of the figure) taken 20 minutesafter stimulation, where the curve is far more erect than that of the normal rate of growth before stimulation.

Fig. 104.Fig. 104.—Variation of growth induced by direct stimulation. First part of the curve shows normal rate of growth. Direct stimulation induces contraction (reversal of curve). After-effect of stimulus seen in highly erect curve in upper part of record, taken 20 minutes after.

Fig. 104.—Variation of growth induced by direct stimulation. First part of the curve shows normal rate of growth. Direct stimulation induces contraction (reversal of curve). After-effect of stimulus seen in highly erect curve in upper part of record, taken 20 minutes after.

The effects of Indirect and Direct stimulation of the tendril are summarised below:

(1) Indirect stimulation induces a sudden enhancement of rate of growth, followed by a recovery of the normal rate.(2) Direct stimulation induces a retardation of the rate of growth which may culminate into an actual contraction.The after-effect of direct stimulus of moderate intensity is an enhancement of the rate of growth.

(1) Indirect stimulation induces a sudden enhancement of rate of growth, followed by a recovery of the normal rate.

(2) Direct stimulation induces a retardation of the rate of growth which may culminate into an actual contraction.The after-effect of direct stimulus of moderate intensity is an enhancement of the rate of growth.

The experiments described above demonstrate the effects of direct and indirect electrical stimulus. I shall now proceed to show that mechanical stimulus induces effects which are similar to those of electric stimulus.

Effect of Direct mechanical stimulus: Experiment 108.—In this case I took a tendril ofCucurbita, and attached it to the ordinary High Magnification Crescograph, the record of which gives the absolute rate of its normal growth, and the induced variation of that rate. The tendril was stimulated mechanically by simultaneous friction of its different sides. The immediate effect was a retardation of growth, the reduced rate being less than half the normal. There was a recovery on the cessation of the stimulus; the rate of growth was even slightly enhanced after an interval of 15 minutes. Table XXVI shows the immediate and after-effects of mechanical stimulation on growth.

TABLE XXVI.—SHOWING THE IMMEDIATE AND AFTER-EFFECT OF MECHANICAL STIMULATION ON TENDRIL (Cucurbita).

Normal rate of growth0·44 µ per sec.Retarded rate immediately after stimulation0·20 µ   "     "Recovery and enhancement after 15 minutes0·50 µ   "     "

The immediate and after-effects of mechanical stimulus on the tendril are therefore the same as that of electric stimulus. The incipient contraction under direct mechanical stimulus, moreover, is not the special characteristic of tendrils, but of growing plants in general. For I have shown (page 203) that the growth of flower stalk ofZephyranthesis also retarded after mechanical friction, from the normal rate 0·48 µ to 0·11 µ after stimulation. We shall find later that different plant organs, after moderate stimulation, exhibit acceleration of growth as an after-effect. The phenomenon of responsive reaction of tendril is therefore not unique, but similar to that of other organs under all forms of stimulation. The only speciality in tendril is that owing to anatomical peculiarities, the perceptive power of the organ for mechanical stimulus is highly developed.

We are now in a position to offer an explanation of the induced concavity of the stimulated side of the tendril, and its recovery after brief contact. The experiments that have been described show that:

(1) the proximal side contracts because it is directly stimulated, and the distal side, being indirectly stimulated, expands; the curvature is thus due to the joint effects of contraction of one side, and expansion of the opposite side, and(2) the recovery of the tendril after brief contact is hastened by the after-effect of stimulus, which is expansion and acceleration of growth.

(1) the proximal side contracts because it is directly stimulated, and the distal side, being indirectly stimulated, expands; the curvature is thus due to the joint effects of contraction of one side, and expansion of the opposite side, and

(2) the recovery of the tendril after brief contact is hastened by the after-effect of stimulus, which is expansion and acceleration of growth.

The results given above will also be found to explain Fitting's important observations[5]that (a) the stimulated side of the tendril undergoes transient contraction with subsequent acceleration of growth, and that (b) the distal or convex side undergoes an immediate enhancement of growth.

Fig. 105.Fig. 105.—Positive curvature of tendril of Cucurbita under unilateral stimulus of contact at x.

Fig. 105.—Positive curvature of tendril of Cucurbita under unilateral stimulus of contact at x.

I give below a record given by a tendril ofCucurbitain response to unilateral contact of short duration (Fig. 105). Successive dots in the record are at intervals of three seconds. The latent period was ten seconds, and the maximum curvature was attained in the course of two and a half minutes. The curvature persisted for a further period of two minutes after which recovery was completed in the course of 12 minutes. Feeble stimulation is attended by a recovery within a short period, but under strong stimulus the induced curvature becomes more persistent.

Fig. 106.Fig. 106.—Diagrammatic representation of effects of Indirect and Direct unilateral stimulation of the tendril. Indirect stimulation, I, induces movement away from stimulated side (negative curvature) represented by continuous arrow. Direct stimulation, D, induces movement towards stimulus (positive curvature) indicated by dotted arrow.

Fig. 106.—Diagrammatic representation of effects of Indirect and Direct unilateral stimulation of the tendril. Indirect stimulation, I, induces movement away from stimulated side (negative curvature) represented by continuous arrow. Direct stimulation, D, induces movement towards stimulus (positive curvature) indicated by dotted arrow.

I have referred to the remarkable observation of Fitting that though the application of stimulus on the upper sideof the tendril ofPassifloradid not induce any response, yet it inhibited the normal response of the under side.

The results of experiments which I have described will, however, afford a satisfactory explanation of this curious inhibition. It has been explained, that the curvature of the tendril is due to the joint effects of diminished turgor and contraction at the directly stimulated side, and an enhancement of turgor and expansion on the opposite side. In the diagram seen in figure 106, the left is the more excitable side, and contraction will induce concavity of the stimulated side. But if the opposite or less excitable side of the tendril be stimulated at the same time, then the transmitted effect of indirect stimulus will induce enhancement of turgor and expansion on the left side, and thus neutralise the previous effect of direct stimulus. An inhibition of response will thus result from the stimulation of the opposite side.

A difficulty arises here from the fact that the upper side of the tendril (the right side in Fig. 106) is supposed to be inexcitable and non-contractile. Hence there may be a misgiving that the stimulation of the non-motile side may not induce the effect of indirect stimulus (an increase of turgor and expansion) at the opposite side, which is to inhibit the response. But I have shown that even a non-contractile organ under stimulus generates boththe impulses, positive and negative. This is seen illustrated in figure 100, where the rigid stem ofMimosawas subjected to unilateral stimulation; the effect of indirect stimulus was found to induce an enhancement of turgor at the diametrically opposite side, and thus caused an erectile movement of the motile leaf. Electric investigations which I have carried out also corroborate the results given above. Here also stimulation of a non-motile organ at any point, induces at a diametrically opposite point, a positive electric variation indicative of enhanced turgor. It will thus be seen that inhibition is possible even in the absence of contraction of the upper side of the tendril; hence the contraction of the directly stimulated side is neutralised by the effect of indirect stimulation of the distal side.

It is generally supposed that the upper side of the tendril ofPassiflorais devoid of contractility. This is however not the case, for my experiments show that stimulation of the upper side also induces contraction and concavity of that side, though the actual movement is relatively feeble.

Experiment 109.—In order to subject the question to quantitative test I applied feeble stimulus of the same intensity on upper and lower side alternately. Successive stimuli were kept more or less uniform by employing the following device. I took a flat strip of wood 1 cm. in breadth, and coated 2 cm. of its length with shellac varnish mixed with fine emery powder. On drying the surface became rough, the flat surface was gently pressed against the area of the tendril to be stimulated, and quickly drawn so that the rough surface 2 cm.×1 cm. was rubbed against the tendril in each experiment. Stimulation, thus produced, induced a responsive movement of each side ofthe organ. The extent of the maximum movement was measured by the microscope micrometer. The following results were obtained with four different specimens.

TABLE XXVII.—SHOWING THE RELATIVE INTENSITIES OF RESPONSES OF THE UPPER AND UNDER SIDE OF TENDRIL (Passiflora).

Movement induced by stimulation of under side, A.Movement induced by stimulation of upper side, B.RatioB⁄A.(1)   85 divisions14 divisions1⁄6(2) 106     "15     "1⁄7(3)   60     "8     "1⁄7(4)   80     "10     "1⁄8

It will thus be seen that the upper side of the tendril is not totally inexcitable, its power of contraction being about one-seventh that of the under side.

I shall now describe certain remarkable results which show that under certain definite conditions the tendril moves away from the stimulated side. I have explained, how in growing organs the effect of unilateral stimulus longitudinally transmitted, induces an expansion higher up on the same side to which the stimulus is applied, resulting in convexity and movement away from the stimulus (cf. Laws of Tropic Curvatures, p. 286). As the reaction of tendril is in no way different from that of growing organs in general, it occurred to me that it would be possible to induce in it a negative curvature by application of indirect unilateral stimulus.

Experiment 110.—A tendril ofPassiflorawas held in a clamp, as in the diagram (Fig. 106) in which the left is the more excitable side of the organ. The responsive movement of the tendril is observed by focussing a reading microscope on a mark on the upper part of the tendril. Direct mechanical stimulation at the dotted arrow makes the tendril move in the same direction, the response beingpositive. But if stimulus be applied on the same side below the clamp the tendril is found to move away from stimulus, the response being nownegative. This reversal of response, as previously stated, is due to the fact that the transmitted effect of indirect stimulus induces an acceleration of growth higher up on the same side, which now becomes convex. The result though unexpected, is in every way parallel to the response of the flower bud ofCrinum, in which the normal positive response was converted into negative by changing the point of application of stimulus, so that it became indirect (p. 216).

The response of tendril is in no way different from that of growing organs in general.

Direct stimulus, electrical or mechanical, induces an incipient contraction; the after-effect of a feeble stimulus is an acceleration of growth above the normal. Indirect stimulus induces an enhancement of the rate of growth.

Under unilateral mechanical stimulus of short duration the directly excited proximal side undergoes contraction, the indirectly stimulated distal side exhibits the opposite effect of expansion. The induced curvature is thus due to the joint effects of the contraction of one side, and the expansion of the opposite side.

As the after-effect of direct stimulus is an acceleration of growth above the normal, the stimulated side undergoes an expansion by which the recovery is hastened.

Unilateral application of direct stimulus induces apositivecurvature, but the same stimulus applied at a distance from the responding region induces anegativecurvature.

The tendril ofPassiflorais excitable both on the upper and under sides: the excitability of the under side is about seven times greater than that of the upper side.

Stimulation of one side of the tendril induces an expansion of the opposite side, even in cases where the contractility of the stimulated side is feeble.

The response to stimulation of the more excitable side of the tendril is thus inhibited by the stimulation of the opposite side. This is because of the neutralisation of the effect of direct by that of indirect stimulation.

[4]Jost—Ibid—p. 490.

[4]Jost—Ibid—p. 490.

[5]Pfeffer—Ibid—Vol. III, p. 57.

[5]Pfeffer—Ibid—Vol. III, p. 57.

Before describing the effect of unilateral application of an electrical current in inducing tropic curvature, I shall give an account of the polar effect of anode and cathode on the pulvinated and growing organs. In my previous work[6]on the action of electrical current on sensitive pulvini I have shown that:—

(1) at the 'make' of a current of moderate intensity a contraction takes place at the cathode; the anode induces no such contractile effect;(2) at the 'make' of a stronger current both the anode and cathode induce contraction.

(1) at the 'make' of a current of moderate intensity a contraction takes place at the cathode; the anode induces no such contractile effect;

(2) at the 'make' of a stronger current both the anode and cathode induce contraction.

I have also carried out further investigations on the polar effect of current on the autonomous activity of the leaflet ofDesmodium gyrans. These rhythmic pulsations can be recorded by my Oscillating Recorder. Each pulsation consists of a sudden contractile movement downwards, corresponding to the systole of a beating heart, and a slower up movement of diastolic expansion. Application ofcathode at the pulvinule was found to exert acontractilereaction, exhibited either by the reduction of normal limit of diastolic expansion, or by an arrest of movement at systole. The effect of anode was precisely the opposite; the inducedexpansionwas exhibited either by reduction of normal limit of systolic contraction, or by arrest of pulsation at diastole.

From the above results it is seen that with a feeble current:

(1) contraction is induced at the cathode, and(2) expansion is brought about at the anode.

(1) contraction is induced at the cathode, and

(2) expansion is brought about at the anode.

These effects take place under the action of a feeble current. Under strong currents, contraction takes place both at the anode and the cathode.

The object of this investigation was to determine whether anode and cathode exerted similar discriminative and opposite effects on growth. For this experiment I took a specimen ofKysoorand determined the region where growth was maximum. A piece of moist cloth was wrapped round this region to serve as one of the two electrodes. The second electrode was placed in the neighbouring indifferent region where there had been a cessation of growth.

Effect of Cathode: Experiment 111.—The particular specimen ofKysoorhad a normal rate of growth of 0·48 µ per second. On application of the cathode the rate was reduced to 0·14 µ per second, or to less than a third. This will be seen in record (Fig. 107), where N is thenormal rate of growth and K, retarded rate under the action of the cathode.

Fig. 107.Fig. 108.Fig. 107.Fig. 108.Fig. 107.—Retardation of rate of growth under the action of cathode (Kysoor).Fig. 108.—Acceleration of rate of growth under anode (Kysoor).

Fig. 107.

Fig. 108.

Fig. 107.Fig. 108.

Fig. 107.—Retardation of rate of growth under the action of cathode (Kysoor).

Fig. 108.—Acceleration of rate of growth under anode (Kysoor).

Effect of anode: Experiment 112.—If the cathode induced a retardation, the anode might be expected to induce an acceleration of growth. But in my first experiment on the action of anode, I could detect no perceptible variation of rate of growth. In trying to account for this failure, I found that the specimen employed for the experiment had normally a very rapid rate of growth. It appeared that an induced acceleration would be brought out more conspicuously by choosing a specimen in which the growth-rate was low, rather than in one in which it was near its maximum. Acting on this idea, I took another specimen ofKysoorin which the normal rate was as slow as 0·10 µ per second. On applying the anodeto the growing region, there was an enhancement to one and half times the normal rate (Fig. 108).

TABLE XXVIII.—EFFECT OF ANODE AND CATHODE ON GROWTH (Kysoor).

Specimen ANormal rateAcceleration under anode0·10 µ per sec.0·155 µ per sec.Specimen BNormal rateRetardation under cathode0·48 µ per sec.0·14 µ per sec.

The effects given above take place under the action of a feeble current. Strong current on the other hand induces a retardation or an arrest of growth.

I have in the above experiments demonstrated the normal effect of anode in inducing expansion and acceleration of rate of growth; the cathode was shown to induce contraction and retardation of growth. Unilateral application of anode and cathode thus induces appropriate curvatures in pulvinated and in growing organs.

The effects of an electric current on growth is modified by the direction of current. A feeble anodic current enhances the rate of growth; a cathodic current on the other hand induces a retardation of the rate. Strong current, both anodic and cathodic, induces a retardation.

[6]"Irritability of Plants," p. 212.

[6]"Irritability of Plants," p. 212.

In describing thermonastic curvatures Pfeffer says that "a special power of thermonastic response has been developed by various flowers, in which low temperatures produce closing movements, and high temperatures, opening ones. The flowers ofCrocus vernusandCrocus luteusare specially responsive, as also those ofTulipa Gesnerianafor these flowers perceptibly respond to a change of temperature of half a degree centigrade."[7]

We have hitherto studied the response of various organs tostimulus; we have now to deal with the effect of thermal variation. Does rise of temperature act like other forms of stimuli or is its action different? We have therefore to find:

(1) The physiological effect of variation of temperature.(2) Whether thermonastic irritability is confined only to certain classes of organs, or is it a phenomenon of very wide occurrence?(3) Whether variation of temperature induces in anisotropic organs only one type of response, or two types, positive and negative.(4) The law which determines the direction of responsive movement.

(1) The physiological effect of variation of temperature.

(2) Whether thermonastic irritability is confined only to certain classes of organs, or is it a phenomenon of very wide occurrence?

(3) Whether variation of temperature induces in anisotropic organs only one type of response, or two types, positive and negative.

(4) The law which determines the direction of responsive movement.

As regards the effect of rise of temperature we have seen that, within normal limits, it induces expansion and acceleration of the rate of growth. Stimulus, on the other hand, induces precisely the opposite effect. Hence the physiological reaction of steady rise of temperature is, generally speaking, antagonistic to that of stimulus. This conclusion is supported by numerous experiments which I have carried out with various plant organs. Example of this will be found in the present and subsequent chapters.

The only condition requisite for the exhibition of response is the differential excitability of an anisotropic organ. It is therefore likely to be exhibited by a large variety of plant organs, such as pulvini, petioles, leaves, and flowers, and my results show that this is actually the case. This particular sensibility, moreover, is not confined to delicate structures, but is extended to rigid trees and their branches.

Before proceeding further, it is necessary to draw attention to the confusion which arises from the use of the common prefix 'thermo' in thermonasty and thermo-tropism. With regard to this Pfeffer says "It is not known whether radiated and conducted heat exercise a similar thermotropic reaction."[8]I shall show that the reactions to radiant heat, and to conducted heat(rise of temperature) are of opposite character, radiation inducing contraction, and rise of temperature, expansion. It is therefore advisable to distinguish the thermal, or temperature effect, from the radio-thermal effect of infra-red radiation.

As regards the effect of variation of temperature I shall proceed to show that there are two distinct types, which I shall, for convenience, distinguish as thePositiveandNegative.

Positive thermonastic reaction is exhibited by organs in which the upper half is the more excitable. Response to rise of temperature is bydownwardoroutwardmovement. In floral organs this finds expression by a movement of opening. In illustration of this may be cited the examples of the well known Crocus and also ofZephyranthes.

Negative thermonastic movement is shown by organs in which the lower half is the more excitable. Here the response to rise of temperature is by anupwardorinwardmovement. I shall show that an example of this is furnished by the flower ofNymphæawhich closes under rise, and opens during fall of temperature.

Response ofZephyranthes:Experiment 113.—Viewed from the top, the inner side of the petal of a flower is the upper side. TheCrocusflower under rise of temperature opens outwards by expansion of the inner side, which must be the more excitable. AsCrocuswas not available in Calcutta, I found the flower ofZephyranthes(sometimes called the IndianCrocus) reacting to variation oftemperature in a manner similar to that ofCrocus, that is to say, the flower opens under rise and closes with a fall of temperature. For obtaining record all the perianth segments but one was removed. This segment was attached to the recording lever. On lowering of temperature through 5°C. there was an up-movement, or a movement of closure. Rise of temperature induced, on the other hand, a movement of opening.

Fig. 109.Fig. 109.—Thermonastic and radionastic responses of petal ofZephyranthesC, closing movement due to cooling, and H, opening movement due to warming; R, closing movement due to heat-radiation. Note opposite responses to rise of temperature and to thermal radiation.

Fig. 109.—Thermonastic and radionastic responses of petal ofZephyranthesC, closing movement due to cooling, and H, opening movement due to warming; R, closing movement due to heat-radiation. Note opposite responses to rise of temperature and to thermal radiation.

Effect of thermal radiation: Experiment 114.—I stated that the effect of thermal radiation acts as a stimulus, inducing a reaction which is antagonistic to that of rise of temperature. In verification of this, I subjected the specimen to the action of infra-red radiation acting from all sides. The result is seen in the responsive movement of closure (Fig. 109 R). These experiments demonstrate clearly that the responses to rise of temperature and thermal radiation are of opposite signs.

As a movement of closure was induced by the diffuse stimulus of thermal radiation, it is evident that this must have been brought about by the greater contraction of theinner half of the perianth; hence the inner half of the organ is relatively the more excitable.

Fig. 110.Fig. 110.—The Thermonastic Recorder. T, metallic thermometer attached to the short arm of the upper lever; the specimen ofNymphæa, N, has one of its perianth leaves attached to the short arm of the second lever by a thread. C, clockwork for oscillation of the plate.

Fig. 110.—The Thermonastic Recorder. T, metallic thermometer attached to the short arm of the upper lever; the specimen ofNymphæa, N, has one of its perianth leaves attached to the short arm of the second lever by a thread. C, clockwork for oscillation of the plate.

Response ofNymphæa:Experiment 115.—Many of the IndianNymphæaceæhave their sepals and petals closed during the day, and open at night. I find that the perianth leaves of this flower are markedly sensitive tovariation of temperature. The Thermonastic Recorder employed in this investigation is shown in figure 110. The record given in figure 111 shows that the perianth segment, subjected to a few degrees' rise of temperature, responded by an up-movement of closure, due to greater expansion of the outer half. The latent period was 6 seconds, and the maximum effect was attained in the further course of 21 seconds. This experiment shows that the thermonastic response of this flower is of the negative type.

Fig. 111.Fig. 111.—Negative thermonastic response ofNymphæa. Application of warmth at the vertical mark induced up-movement of closure, but stimulus of electric shock at arrow induced rapid excitatory down movement of opening. Successive dots at intervals of a second.

Fig. 111.—Negative thermonastic response ofNymphæa. Application of warmth at the vertical mark induced up-movement of closure, but stimulus of electric shock at arrow induced rapid excitatory down movement of opening. Successive dots at intervals of a second.

Effect of stimulus: Experiment 116.—In the positive type of thermonastic organs, where rise of temperature induced a movement of opening, stimulus induced the opposite movement of closure (Expt. 114). We shall now study the effect of stimulus on the movement ofNymphæa, which undergoes closure during rise of temperature, as seen in the first part of the record in figure 111. Stimulus of electric shock was applied at the point marked with anarrow; the response is seen to be by a movement of opening. Here also we find the effects of rise of temperature and of stimulus to be antagonistic to each other. This will be clearly seen in the following tabular statement.

TABLE XXIX.—SHOWING THE EFFECT OF RISE OF TEMPERATURE AND OF STIMULUS ON THERMONASTIC ORGANS.

Specimen.Effect of rise of temperature.Effect of stimulus.Zephyranthes(positive type).Movement of openingMovement of closure.Nymphæa(negative type).Movement of closureMovement of opening.

InNymphæait is the outer side of the perianth that is relatively the more excitable since diffuse electric stimulus induces a movement of opening due to the greater contraction of the outer side. It is by the greater expansion of this more excitable side that the movement of closure is effected during rise of temperature.

From the results of experiments given above we arrive at the following:—

LAW OF THERMONASTIC REACTIONRISE OF TEMPERATURE INDUCES A GREATER EXPANSIONOF THE MORE EXCITABLE HALF OF AN ANISOTROPIC ORGAN.

Thermonastic movements are induced by the differential physiological effect of variation of temperature on the two halves of an anisotropic organ.

Rise of temperature induces greater expansion, and enhancement of rate of growth of the more excitable half of the organ; lowering of temperature induces the opposite effect.

Two types of thermonastic movements are met with, thepositiveexhibiting a movement of opening during rise of temperature; in these the inner half of the organ is relatively the more excitable. Example of this is seen in theCrocusand inZephyranthes.

In thenegativetype, rise of temperature induces a movement of closure. Here the outer half of the organ is the more excitable. The flower ofNymphæabelongs to this type.

The effect of stimulus is antagonistic to that of rise of temperature. In positive thermonastic organs stimulus induces a movement of closure; in the negative type it induces a movement of opening.


Back to IndexNext