[17a]“Nature,” Nov. 12, 1885.
[20a]“Hist. Nat. Gén.,” tom. ii. p. 411, 1859.
[23a]“Selections, &c.” Trübner & Co., 1884. [Out of print.]
[29a]“Selections, &c., and Remarks on Romanes’ ‘Mental Intelligence in Animals,’” Trübner & Co., 1884. pp. 228, 229. [Out of print.]
[35a]Quoted by M. Vianna De Lima in his “Exposé Sommaire,” &c., p. 6. Paris, Delagrave, 1886.
[40a]I have given the passage in full on p. 254a of my “Selections,” &c. [Now out of print.] I observe that Canon Kingsley felt exactly the same difficulty that I had felt myself, and saw also how alone it could be met. He makes the wood-wren say, “Something told him his mother had done it before him, and he was flesh of her flesh, life of her life, and had inherited her instinct (as we call hereditary memory, to avoid the trouble of finding out what it is and how it comes).”—Fraser, June, 1867. Canon Kingsley felt he must insist on the continued personality of the two generations before he could talk about inherited memory. On the other hand, though he does indeed speak of this as almost a synonym for instinct, he seems not to have realised how right he was, and implies that we should find some fuller and more satisfactory explanation behind this, only that we are too lazy to look for it.
[44a]26 Sept., 1877. “Unconscious Memory.” ch. ii.
[52a]This chapter is taken almost entirely from my book, “Selections, &c.. and Remarks on Romanes’ ‘Mental Evolution in Animals.’” Trübner, 1884. [Now out of print.]
[52b]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 113. Kegan Paul, Nov., 1883.
[52c]Ibid. p. 115.
[52d]Ibid. p. 116.
[53a]“Mental Evolution in Animals.” p. 131. Kegan Paul, Nov., 1883.
[54a]Vol. I, 3rd ed., 1874, p. 141, and Problem I. 21.
[54b]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” pp. 177, 178. Nov., 1883.
[55a]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 192.
[55b]Ibid.p. 195.
[55c]Ibid.p. 296. Nov., 1883.
[56a]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 33. Nov., 1883.
[56b]Ibid., p. 116.
[56c]Ibid., p. 178.
[59a]“Evolution Old and New,” pp. 357, 358.
[60a]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 159. Kegan Paul & Co., 1883.
[61a]“Zoonomia,” vol. i. p. 484.
[61b]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 297. Kegan Paul & Co., 1883.
[61c]Ibid., p. 201. Kegan Paul & Co., 1883.
[62a]“Mental Evolution in Animals,” p. 301. November, 1883.
[62b]“Origin of Species,” ed. i. p. 209.
[62c]Ibid., ed. vi., 1876. p. 206.
[62d]“Formation of Vegetable Mould,” etc., p. 98.
[62e]Quoted by Mr. Romanes as written in the last year of Mr. Darwin’s life.
[63a]Macmillan, 1883.
[66a]“Nature,” August 5, 1886.
[67a]London, H. K. Lewis, 1886.
[70a]“Charles Darwin.” Longmans, 1885.
[70b]Lectures at the London Institution, Feb., 1886.
[70c]“Charles Darwin.” Leipzig. 1885.
[72a]See Professor Hering’s “Zur Lehre von der Beziehung zwischen Leib und Seele. Mittheilung über Fechner’s psychophysisches Gesetz.”
[73a]Quoted by M. Vianna De Lima in his “Exposé Sommaire des Théories Transformistes de Lamarck, Darwin, et Hæckel.” Paris, 1886, p. 23.
[81a]“Origin of Species,” ed. i., p. 6; see also p. 43.
[83a]“I think it can be shown that there is such a power at work in ‘Natural Selection’ (the title of my book).”—“Proceedings of the Linnean Society for 1858,” vol. iii., p. 51.
[86a]“On Naval Timber and Arboriculture,” 1831, pp. 384, 385. See also “Evolution Old and New,” pp. 320, 321.
[87a]“Origin of Species,” p. 49, ed. vi.
[92a]“Origin of Species,” ed. i., pp. 188, 189.
[93a]Page 9.
[94a]Page 226.
[96a]“Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society.” Williams and Norgate, 1858, p. 61.
[102a]“Zoonomia,” vol. i., p. 505.
[104a]See “Evolution Old and New.” p. 122.
[105a]“Phil. Zool.,” i., p. 80.
[105b]Ibid., i. 82.
[105c]Ibid.vol. i., p. 237.
[107a]See concluding chapter.
[122a]Report, 9, 26.
[135a]Ps. cii. 25–27, Bible version.
[136a]Ps. cxxxix., Prayer-book version.
[140a]Contemporary Review, August, 1885, p. 84.
[142a]London, David Bogue, 1881, p. 60.
[144a]August 12, 1886.
[150a]Paris, Delagrave, 1886.
[150b]Page 60.
[150c]“Œuvre complètes,” tom. ix. p. 422. Paris, Garnier frères, 1875.
[150d]“Hist. Nat.,” tom. i., p. 13, 1749, quoted “Evol. Old and New,” p. 108.
[156a]“Origin of Species,” ed. vi., p. 107.
[156b]Ibid., ed. vi., p. 166.
[157a]“Origin of Species,” ed. vi., p. 233.
[157b]Ibid.
[157c]Ibid., ed. vi., p. 109.
[157d]Ibid., ed. vi., p. 401.
[158a]“Origin of Species,” ed. i., p. 490.
[161a]“Origin of Species,” ed. vi., 1876, p. 171.
[163a]“Charles Darwin,” p. 113.
[164a]“Animals and Plants under Domestication,” vol. ii., p. 367, ed. 1875.
[168a]Page 3.
[168b]Page 4.
[169a]It should be remembered this was the year in which the “Vestiges of Creation” appeared.
[173a]“Charles Darwin,” p. 67.
[173b]H. S. King & Co., 1876.
[174a]Page 17.
[195a]“Phil. Zool.,” tom. i., pp. 34, 35.
[202a]“Origin of Species,” p. 381, ed. i.
[203a]Page 454, ed. i.
[205a]“Principles of Geology,” vol. ii., chap. xxxiv., ed. 1872.
[206a]“Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte,” p. 3. Berlin, 1868.
[209a]See “Evolution Old and New,” pp. 8, 9.
[216a]“Vestiges,” &c., ed. 1860; Proofs, Illustrations, &c., p. xiv.
[216b]Examiner, May 17, 1879, review of “Evolution Old and New.”
[218a]Given in part in “Evolution Old and New.”
[219a]“Mind,” p. 498, Oct., 1883.
[224a]“Degeneration,” 1880, p. 10.
[227a]E.g. the Rev. George Henslow, in “Modern Thought,” vol. ii., No. 5, 1881.
[232a]“Nature,” Aug. 6, 1886.
[234a]See Mr. Darwin’s “Animals and Plants under Domestication,” vol. i., p. 466, &c., ed. 1875.
[235a]Paris, 1873, Introd., p. vi.
[235b]“Hist. Nat. Gen.,” ii. 404, 1859.
[239a]As these pages are on the point of going to press, I see that the writer of an article on Liszt in the “Athenæum” makes the same emendation on Shakespeare’s words that I have done.
[240a]“Voyages of theAdventureandBeagle,” vol. iii., p. 373. London, 1839.
[242a]See Professor Paley, “Fraser,” Jan., 1882, “Science Gossip,” Nos. 162, 163, June and July, 1878, and “Nature,” Jan. 3, Jan. 10, Feb. 28, and March 27, 1884.
[245a]“Formation of Vegetable Mould,” etc., p. 217. Murray, 1882.
[248a]“Fortnightly Review,” Jan., 1886.
[253a]“On the Growth of Trees and Protoplasmic Continuity.” London, Stanford, 1886.
[260a]Sometimes called Mendelejeff’s (see “Monthly Journal of Science,” April, 1884).
[261a]I am aware that attempts have been made to say that we can conceive a condition of matter, although there is no matter in connection with it—as, for example, that we can have motion without anything moving (see “Nature,” March 5, March 12, and April 9, 1885)—but I think it little likely that this opinion will meet general approbation.
[264a]Page 53.