I have been chief guest at a good many banquets myself, and I knowwhat brother Andrew is feeling like now. He has been receivingcompliments and nothing but compliments, but he knows that there isanother side to him that needs censure.I am going to vary the complimentary monotony. While we have allbeen listening to the complimentary talk Mr. Carnegie's face hasscintillated with fictitious innocence. You'd think he nevercommitted a crime in his life. But he has.Look at his pestiferous simplified spelling. Imagine the calamityon two sides of the ocean when he foisted his simplified spelling onthe whole human race. We've got it all now so that nobody couldspell....If Mr. Carnegie had left spelling alone we wouldn't have had anyspots on the sun, or any San Francisco quake, or any businessdepression.There, I trust he feels better now and that he has enjoyed my abusemore than he did his compliments. And now that I think I have himsmoothed down and feeling comfortable I just want to say one thingmore—that his simplified spelling is all right enough, but, likechastity, you can carry it too far.
As he was about to go, Carnegie called his attention to the beautiful souvenir bronze and gold-plated goblets that stood at each guest's plate. Carnegie said:
“The club had those especially made at Tiffany's for this occasion. They cost ten dollars apiece.”
Clemens sand: “Is that so? Well, I only meant to take my own; but if that's the case I'll load my cab with them.”
We made an attempt to reform on the matter of billiards. The continued strain of late hours was doing neither of us any particular good. More than once I journeyed into the country on one errand and another, mainly for rest; but a card saying that he was lonely and upset, for lack of his evening games, quickly brought me back again. It was my wish only to serve him; it was a privilege and an honor to give him happiness.
Billiards, however, was not his only recreation just then. He walked out a good deal, and especially of a pleasant Sunday morning he liked the stroll up Fifth Avenue. Sometimes we went as high as Carnegie's, on Ninety-second Street, and rode home on top of the electric stage—always one of Mark Twain's favorite diversions.
From that high seat he liked to look down on the panorama of the streets, and in that free, open air he could smoke without interference. Oftener, however, we turned at Fifty-ninth Street, walking both ways.
When it was pleasant we sometimes sat on a bench in Central Park; and once he must have left a handkerchief there, for a few days later one of his handkerchiefs came to him accompanied by a note. Its finder, a Mr. Lockwood, received a reward, for Mark Twain wrote him:
There is more rejoicing in this house over that one handkerchiefthat was lost and is found again than over the ninety and nine thatnever went to the wash at all. Heaven will reward you, I know itwill.
On Sunday mornings the return walk would be timed for about the hour that the churches would be dismissed. On the first Sunday morning we had started a little early, and I thoughtlessly suggested, when we reached Fifty-ninth Street, that if we returned at once we would avoid the throng. He said, quietly:
“I like the throng.”
So we rested in the Plaza Hotel until the appointed hour. Men and women noticed him, and came over to shake his hand. The gigantic man in uniform; in charge of the carriages at the door, came in for a word. He had opened carriages for Mr. Clemens at the Twenty-third Street station, and now wanted to claim that honor. I think he received the most cordial welcome of any one who came. I am sure he did. It was Mark Twain's way to warm to the man of the lower social rank. He was never too busy, never too preoccupied, to grasp the hand of such a man; to listen to his story, and to say just the words that would make that man happy remembering them.
We left the Plaza Hotel and presently were amid the throng of outpouring congregations. Of course he was the object on which every passing eye turned; the presence to which every hat was lifted. I realized that this open and eagerly paid homage of the multitude was still dear to him, not in any small and petty way, but as the tribute of a nation, the expression of that affection which in his London and Liverpool speeches he had declared to be the last and final and most precious reward that any man can win, whether by character or achievement. It was his final harvest, and he had the courage to claim it—the aftermath of all his years of honorable labor and noble living.
If the reader has any curiosity as to some of the less usual letters which a man of wide public note may inspire, perhaps he will find a certain interest in a few selected from the thousands which yearly came to Mark Twain.
For one thing, he was constantly receiving prescriptions and remedies whenever the papers reported one of his bronchial or rheumatic attacks. It is hardly necessary to quote examples of these, but only a form of his occasional reply, which was likely to be in this wise:
DEAR SIR [or MADAM],—I try every remedy sent to me. I am now onNo. 87. Yours is 2,653. I am looking forward to its beneficialresults.
Of course a large number of the nostrums and palliatives offered were preparations made by the wildest and longest-haired medical cranks. One of these sent an advertisement of a certain Elixir of Life, which was guaranteed to cure everything—to “wash and cleanse the human molecules, and so restore youth and preserve life everlasting.”
Anonymous letters are not usually popular or to be encouraged, but Mark Twain had an especial weakness for compliments that came in that way. They were not mercenary compliments. The writer had nothing to gain. Two such letters follow—both written in England just at the time of his return.
MARK TWAIN.DEAR SIR,—Please accept a poor widow's good-by and kindest wishes.I have had some of your books sent to me; have enjoyed them verymuch—only wish I could afford to buy some.I should very much like to have seen you. I have many photos of youwhich I have cut from several papers which I read. I have one whereyou are writing in bed, which I cut from the Daily News. Likemyself, you believe in lots of sleep and rest. I am 70 and I find Ineed plenty. Please forgive the liberty I have taken in writing toyou. If I can't come to your funeral may we meet beyond the river.May God guard you, is the wish of a lonely old widow.Yours sincerely,
The other letter also tells its own story:
DEAR, KIND MARK TWAIN,—For years I have wanted to write and thankyou for the comfort you were to me once, only I never quite knewwhere you were, and besides I did not want to bother you; but to-dayI was told by some one who saw you going into the lift at the Savoythat you looked sad and I thought it might cheer you a little tinybit to hear how you kept a poor lonely girl from ruining her eyeswith crying every night for long months.Ten years ago I had to leave home and earn my living as a governessand Fate sent me to spend a winter with a very dull old countryfamily in the depths of Staffordshire. According to the genialEnglish custom, after my five charges had gone to bed, I took myevening meal alone in the school-room, where “Henry Tudor had suppedthe night before Bosworth,” and there I had to stay without a soulto speak to till I went to bed. At first I used to cry every night,but a friend sent me a copy of your Huckleberry Finn and I nevercried any more. I kept him handy under the copy-books and maps, andwhen Henry Tudor commenced to stretch out his chilly hands toward meI grabbed my dear Huck and he never once failed me; I opened him atrandom and in two minutes I was in another world. That's why I amso grateful to you and so fond of you, and I thought you might liketo know; for it is yourself that has the kind heart, as is easilyseen from the way you wrote about the poor old nigger. I am astenographer now and live at home, but I shall never forget how youhelped me. God bless you and spare you long to those you are dearto.
A letter which came to him soon after his return from England contained a clipping which reported the good work done by Christian missionaries in the Congo, especially among natives afflicted by the terrible sleeping sickness. The letter itself consisted merely of a line, which said:
Won't you give your friends, the missionaries, a good mark for this?
The writer's name was signed, and Mark Twain answered:
In China the missionaries are not wanted, & so they ought to bedecent & go away. But I have not heard that in the Congo themissionary servants of God are unwelcome to the native.Evidently those missionaries axe pitying, compassionate, kind. Howit would improve God to take a lesson from them! He invented &distributed the germ of that awful disease among those helpless,poor savages, & now He sits with His elbows on the balusters & looksdown & enjoys this wanton crime. Confidently, & between you & me—well, never mind, I might get struck by lightning if I said it.Those are good and kindly men, those missionaries, but they are ameasureless satire upon their Master.
To which the writer answered:
O wicked Mr. Clemens! I have to ask Saint Joan of Arc to pray foryou; then one of these days, when we all stand before the GoldenGates and we no longer “see through a glass darkly and know only inpart,” there will be a struggle at the heavenly portals between Joanof Arc and St. Peter, but your blessed Joan will conquer and she'lllead Mr. Clemens through the gates of pearl and apologize and pleadfor him.
Of the letters that irritated him, perhaps the following is as fair a sample as any, and it has additional interest in its sequel.
DEAR SIR,—I have written a book—naturally—which fact, however,since I am not your enemy, need give you no occasion to rejoice.Nor need you grieve, though I am sending you a copy. If I knew ofany way of compelling you to read it I would do so, but unless thefirst few pages have that effect I can do nothing. Try the firstfew pages. I have done a great deal more than that with your books,so perhaps you owe me some thing—say ten pages. If after thatattempt you put it aside I shall be sorry—for you.I am afraid that the above looks flippant—but think of thetwitterings of the soul of him who brings in his hand an unbiddenbook, written by himself. To such a one much is due in the way ofindulgence. Will you remember that? Have you forgotten earlytwitterings of your own?
In a memorandum made on this letter Mark Twain wrote:
Another one of those peculiarly depressing letters—a letter cast inartificially humorous form, whilst no art could make the subjecthumorous—to me.
Commenting further, he said:
As I have remarked before about one thousand times the coat of armsof the human race ought to consist of a man with an ax on hisshoulder proceeding toward a grindstone, or it ought to representthe several members of the human race holding out the hat to oneanother; for we are all beggars, each in his own way. One beggar istoo proud to beg for pennies, but will beg for an introduction intosociety; another does not care for society, but he wants apostmastership; another will inveigle a lawyer into conversation andthen sponge on him for free advice. The man who wouldn't do any ofthese things will beg for the Presidency. Each admires his owndignity and greatly guards it, but in his opinion the others haven'tany.Mendicancy is a matter of taste and temperament, no doubt, but nohuman being is without some form of it. I know my own form, youknow yours. Let us conceal them from view and abuse the others.There is no man so poor but what at intervals some man comes to himwith an ax to grind. By and by the ax's aspect becomes familiar tothe proprietor of the grindstone. He perceives that it is the sameold ax. If you are a governor you know that the stranger wants anoffice. The first time he arrives you are deceived; he pours outsuch noble praises of you and your political record that you aremoved to tears; there's a lump in your throat and you are thankfulthat you have lived for this happiness. Then the stranger discloseshis ax, and you are ashamed of yourself and your race. Sixrepetitions will cure you. After that you interrupt the complimentsand say, “Yes, yes, that's all right; never mind about that. Whatis it you want?”But you and I are in the business ourselves. Every now and then wecarry our ax to somebody and ask a whet. I don't carry mine tostrangers—I draw the line there; perhaps that is your way. This isbound to set us up on a high and holy pinnacle and make us look downin cold rebuke on persons who carry their axes to strangers.I do not know how to answer that stranger's letter. I wish he hadspared me. Never mind about him—I am thinking about myself. Iwish he had spared me. The book has not arrived yet; but no matter,I am prejudiced against it.
It was a few days later that he added:
I wrote to that man. I fell back upon the old Overworked, politelie, and thanked him for his book and said I was promising myselfthe pleasure of reading it. Of course that set me free; I was notobliged to read it now at all, and, being free, my prejudice wasgone, and as soon as the book came I opened it to see what it waslike. I was not able to put it down until I had finished. It wasan embarrassing thing to have to write to that man and confess thatfact, but I had to do it. That first letter was merely a lie. Doyou think I wrote the second one to give that man pleasure? Well, Idid, but it was second-hand pleasure. I wrote it first to givemyself comfort, to make myself forget the original lie.
Mark Twain's interest was once aroused by the following:
DEAR SIR,—I have had more or less of your works on my shelves foryears, and believe I have practically a complete set now. This isnothing unusual, of course, but I presume it will seem to youunusual for any one to keep books constantly in sight which theowner regrets ever having read.Every time my glance rests on the books I do regret having readthem, and do not hesitate to tell you so to your face, and care notwho may know my feelings. You, who must be kept busy attending toyour correspondence, will probably pay little or no attention tothis small fraction of it, yet my reasons, I believe, are sound andare probably shared by more people than you are aware of.Probably you will not read far enough through this to see who hassigned it, but if you do, and care to know why I wish I had leftyour work unread, I will tell you as briefly as possible if you willask me.GEORGE B. LAUDER.
Clemens did not answer the letter, but put it in his pocket, perhaps intending to do so, and a few days later, in Boston, when a reporter called, he happened to remember it. The reporter asked permission to print the queer document, and it appeared in his Mark Twain interview next morning. A few days later the writer of it sent a second letter, this time explaining:
MY DEAR SIR,—I saw in to-day's paper a copy of the letter which Iwrote you October 26th.I have read and re-read your works until I can almost recall some ofthem word for word. My familiarity with them is a constant sourceof pleasure which I would not have missed, and therefore the regretwhich I have expressed is more than offset by thankfulness.Believe me, the regret which I feel for having read your works isentirely due to the unalterable fact that I can never again have thepleasure of reading them for the first time.Your sincere admirer,GEORGE B. LADDER.
Mark Twain promptly replied this time:
DEAR SIR, You fooled me completely; I didn't divine what the letterwas concealing, neither did the newspaper men, so you are a verycompetent deceiver.Truly yours,S. L. CLEMENS.
It was about the end of 1907 that the new St. Louis Harbor boat, was completed. The editor of the St. Louis Republic reported that it has been christened “Mark Twain,” and asked for a word of comment. Clemens sent this line:
May my namesake follow in my righteous footsteps, then neither of uswill need any fire insurance.
Howells, in his book, refers to the Human Race Luncheon Club, which Clemens once organized for the particular purpose of damning the species in concert. It was to consist, beside Clemens himself, of Howells, Colonel Harvey, and Peter Dunne; but it somehow never happened that even this small membership could be assembled while the idea was still fresh, and therefore potent.
Out of it, however, grew a number of those private social gatherings which Clemens so dearly loved—small luncheons and dinners given at his own table. The first of these came along toward the end of 1907, when Howells was planning to spend the winter in Italy.
“Howells is going away,” he said, “and I should like to give him a stag-party. We'll enlarge the Human Race Club for the occasion.”
So Howells, Colonel Harvey, Martin Littleton, Augustus Thomas, Robert Porter, and Paderewski were invited. Paderewski was unable to come, and seven in all assembled.
Howells was first to arrive.
“Here comes Howells,” Clemens said. “Old Howells a thousand years old.”
But Howells didn't look it. His face was full of good-nature and apparent health, and he was by no means venerable, either in speech or action. Thomas, Porter, Littleton, and Harvey drifted in. Cocktails were served and luncheon was announced.
Claude, the butler, had prepared the table with fine artistry—its center a mass of roses. There was to be no woman in the neighborhood—Clemens announced this fact as a sort of warrant for general freedom of expression.
Thomas's play, “The Witching Hour,” was then at the height of its great acceptance, and the talk naturally began there. Thomas told something of the difficulty which he found in being able to convince a manager that it would succeed, and declared it to be his own favorite work. I believe there was no dissenting opinion as to its artistic value, or concerning its purpose and psychology, though these had been the stumbling-blocks from a managerial point of view.
When the subject was concluded, and there had come a lull, Colonel Harvey, who was seated at Clemens's left, said:
“Uncle Mark”—he often called him that—“Major Leigh handed me a report of the year's sales just as I was leaving. It shows your royalty returns this year to be very close to fifty thousand dollars. I don't believe there is another such return from old books on record.”
This was said in an undertone, to Clemens only, but was overheard by one or two of those who sat nearest. Clemens was not unwilling to repeat it for the benefit of all, and did so. Howells said:
“A statement like that arouses my basest passions. The books are no good; it's just the advertising they get.”
Clemens said: “Yes, my contract compels the publisher to advertise. It costs them two hundred dollars every time they leave the advertisement out of the magazines.”
“And three hundred every time we put it in,” said Harvey. “We often debate whether it is more profitable to put in the advertisement or to leave it out.”
The talk switched back to plays and acting. Thomas recalled an incident of Beerbohm Tree's performance of “Hamlet.” W. S. Gilbert, of light-opera celebrity, was present at a performance, and when the play ended Mrs. Tree hurried over to him and said:
“Oh, Mr. Gilbert, what did you think of Mr. Tree's rendition of Hamlet?” “Remarkable,” said Gilbert. “Funny without being vulgar.”
It was with such idle tales and talk-play that the afternoon passed. Not much of it all is left to me, but I remember Howells saying, “Did it ever occur to you that the newspapers abolished hell? Well, they did—it was never done by the church. There was a consensus of newspaper opinion that the old hell with its lake of fire and brimstone was an antiquated institution; in fact a dead letter.” And again, “I was coming down Broadway last night, and I stopped to look at one of the street-venders selling those little toy fighting roosters. It was a bleak, desolate evening; nobody was buying anything, and as he pulled the string and kept those little roosters dancing and fighting his remarks grew more and more cheerless and sardonic.
“'Japanese game chickens,' he said; 'pretty toys, amuse the children with their antics. Child of three can operate it. Take them home for Christmas. Chicken-fight at your own fireside.' I tried to catch his eye to show him that I understood his desolation and sorrow, but it was no use. He went on dancing his toy chickens, and saying, over and over, 'Chicken-fight at your own fireside.'”
The luncheon over, we wandered back into the drawing-room, and presently all left but Colonel Harvey. Clemens and the Colonel went up to the billiard-room and engaged in a game of cushion caroms, at twenty-five cents a game. I was umpire and stakeholder, and it was a most interesting occupation, for the series was close and a very cheerful one. It ended the day much to Mark Twain's satisfaction, for he was oftenest winner. That evening he said:
“We will repeat that luncheon; we ought to repeat it once a month. Howells will be gone, but we must have the others. We cannot have a thing like that too often.”
There was, in fact, a second stag-luncheon very soon after, at which George Riggs was present and that rare Irish musician, Denis O'Sullivan. It was another choice afternoon, with a mystical quality which came of the music made by O'Sullivan on some Hindu reeds-pipes of Pan. But we shall have more of O'Sullivan presently—all too little, for his days were few and fleeting.
Howells could not get away just yet. Colonel Harvey, who, like James Osgood, would not fail to find excuse for entertainment, chartered two drawing-room cars, and with Mrs. Harvey took a party of fifty-five or sixty congenial men and women to Lakewood for a good-by luncheon to Howells. It was a day borrowed from June, warm and beautiful.
The trip down was a sort of reception. Most of the guests were acquainted, but many of them did not often meet. There was constant visiting back and forth the full length of the two coaches. Denis O'Sullivan was among the guests. He looked in the bloom of health, and he had his pipes and played his mystic airs; then he brought out the tin-whistle of Ireland, and blew such rollicking melodies as capering fairies invented a long time ago. This was on the train going down.
There was a brief program following the light-hearted feasting—an informal program fitting to that sunny day. It opened with some recitations by Miss Kitty Cheatham; then Colonel Harvey introduced Howells, with mention of his coming journey. As a rule, Howells does not enjoy speaking. He is willing to read an address on occasion, but he has owned that the prospect of talking without his notes terrifies him. This time, however, there was no reluctance, though he had prepared no speech. He was among friends. He looked even happy when he got on his feet, and he spoke like a happy man. He talked about Mark Twain. It was all delicate, delicious chaffing which showed Howells at his very best—all too short for his listeners.
Clemens, replying, returned the chaff, and rambled amusingly among his fancies, closing with a few beautiful words of “Godspeed and safe return” to his old comrade and friend.
Then once more came Denis and his pipes. No one will ever forget his part of the program. The little samples we had heard on the train were expanded and multiplied and elaborated in a way that fairly swept his listeners out of themselves into that land where perhaps Denis himself wanders playing now; for a month later, strong and lusty and beautiful as he seemed that day, he suddenly vanished from among us and his reeds were silent. It never occurred to us then that Denis could die; and as he finished each melody and song there was a shout for a repetition, and I think we could have sat there and let the days and years slip away unheeded, for time is banished by music like that, and one wonders if it might not even divert death.
It was dark when we crossed the river homeward; the myriad lights from heaven-climbing windows made an enchanted city in the sky. The evening, like the day, was warm, and some of the party left the ferry-cabin to lean over and watch the magic spectacle, the like of which is not to be found elsewhere on the earth.
During the forty years or so that had elapsed since the publication of the “Gates Ajar” and the perpetration of Mark Twain's intended burlesque, built on Captain Ned Wakeman's dream, the Christian religion in its more orthodox aspects had undergone some large modifications. It was no longer regarded as dangerous to speak lightly of hell, or even to suggest that the golden streets and jeweled architecture of the sky might be regarded as symbols of hope rather than exhibits of actual bullion and lapidary construction. Clemens re-read his extravaganza, Captain Stormfields Visit to Heaven, gave it a modernizing touch here and there, and handed it to his publishers, who must have agreed that it was no longer dangerous, for it was promptly accepted and appeared in the December and January numbers (1907-8) of Harper's Magazine, and was also issued as a small book. If there were any readers who still found it blasphemous, or even irreverent, they did not say so; the letters that came—and they were a good many—expressed enjoyment and approval, also (some of them) a good deal of satisfaction that Mark Twain “had returned to his earlier form.”
The publication of this story recalled to Clemens's mind another heresy somewhat similar which he had written during the winter of 1891 and 1892 in Berlin. This was a dream of his own, in which he had set out on a train with the evangelist Sam Jones and the Archbishop of Canterbury for the other world. He had noticed that his ticket was to a different destination than the Archbishop's, and so, when the prelate nodded and finally went to sleep, he changed the tickets in their hats with disturbing results. Clemens thought a good deal of this fancy when he wrote it, and when Mrs. Clemens had refused to allow it to be printed he had laboriously translated it into German, with some idea of publishing it surreptitiously; but his conscience had been too much for him. He had confessed, and even the German version had been suppressed.
Clemens often allowed his fancy to play with the idea of the orthodox heaven, its curiosities of architecture, and its employments of continuous prayer, psalm-singing, and harpistry.
“What a childish notion it was,” he said, “and how curious that only a little while ago human beings were so willing to accept such fragile evidences about a place of so much importance. If we should find somewhere to-day an ancient book containing an account of a beautiful and blooming tropical Paradise secreted in the center of eternal icebergs—an account written by men who did not even claim to have seen it themselves—no geographical society on earth would take any stock in that book, yet that account would be quite as authentic as any we have of heaven. If God has such a place prepared for us, and really wanted us to know it, He could have found some better way than a book so liable to alterations and misinterpretation. God has had no trouble to prove to man the laws of the constellations and the construction of the world, and such things as that, none of which agree with His so-called book. As to a hereafter, we have not the slightest evidence that there is any—no evidence that appeals to logic and reason. I have never seen what to me seemed an atom of proof that there is a future life.”
Then, after a long pause, he added:
“And yet—I am strongly inclined to expect one.”
It was on January 11, 1908, that Mark Twain was given his last great banquet by the Lotos Club. The club was about to move again, into splendid new quarters, and it wished to entertain him once more in its old rooms.
He wore white, and amid the throng of black-clad men was like a white moth among a horde of beetles. The room fairly swarmed with them, and they seemed likely to overwhelm him.
President Lawrence was toast-master of the evening, and he ended his customary address by introducing Robert Porter, who had been Mark Twain's host at Oxford. Porter told something of the great Oxford week, and ended by introducing Mark Twain. It had been expected that Clemens would tell of his London experiences. Instead of doing this, he said he had started a new kind of collection, a collection of compliments. He had picked up a number of valuable ones abroad and some at home. He read selections from them, and kept the company going with cheers and merriment until just before the close of his speech. Then he repeated, in his most impressive manner, that stately conclusion of his Liverpool speech, and the room became still and the eyes of his hearers grew dim. It may have been even more moving than when originally given, for now the closing words, “homeward bound,” had only the deeper meaning.
Dr. John MacArthur followed with a speech that was as good a sermon as any he ever delivered, and closed it by saying:
“I do not want men to prepare for heaven, but to prepare to remain on earth, and it is such men as Mark Twain who make other men not fit to die, but fit to live.”
Andrew Carnegie also spoke, and Colonel Harvey, and as the speaking ended Robert Porter stepped up behind Clemens and threw over his shoulders the scarlet Oxford robe which had been surreptitiously brought, and placed the mortar-board cap upon his head, while the diners vociferated their approval. Clemens was quite calm.
“I like this,” he said, when the noise had subsided. “I like its splendid color. I would dress that way all the time, if I dared.”
In the cab going home I mentioned the success of his speech, how well it had been received.
“Yes,” he said; “but then I have the advantage of knowing now that I am likely to be favorably received, whatever I say. I know that my audiences are warm and responseful. It is an immense advantage to feel that. There are cold places in almost every speech, and if your audience notices them and becomes cool, you get a chill yourself in those zones, and it is hard to warm up again. Perhaps there haven't been so many lately; but I have been acquainted with them more than once.” And then I could not help remembering that deadly Whittier birthday speech of more than thirty years before—that bleak, arctic experience from beginning to end.
“We have just time for four games,” he said, as we reached the billiard-room; but there was no sign of stopping when the four games were over. We were winning alternately, and neither noted the time. I was leaving by an early train, and was willing to play all night. The milk-wagons were rattling outside when he said:
“Well, perhaps we'd better quit now. It seems pretty early, though.” I looked at my watch. It was quarter to four, and we said good night.
Edmund Clarence Stedman died suddenly at his desk, January 18, 1908, and Clemens, in response to telegrams, sent this message:
I do not wish to talk about it. He was a valued friend from days that date back thirty-five years. His loss stuns me and unfits me to speak.
He recalled the New England dinners which he used to attend, and where he had often met Stedman.
“Those were great affairs,” he said. “They began early, and they ended early. I used to go down from Hartford with the feeling that it wasn't an all-night supper, and that it was going to be an enjoyable time. Choate and Depew and Stedman were in their prime then—we were all young men together. Their speeches were always worth listening to. Stedman was a prominent figure there. There don't seem to be any such men now—or any such occasions.”
Stedman was one of the last of the old literary group. Aldrich had died the year before. Howells and Clemens were the lingering “last leaves.”
Clemens gave some further luncheon entertainments to his friends, and added the feature of “doe” luncheons—pretty affairs where, with Clara Clemens as hostess, were entertained a group of brilliant women, such as Mrs. Kate Douglas Riggs, Geraldine Farrax, Mrs. Robert Collier, Mrs. Frank Doubleday, and others. I cannot report those luncheons, for I was not present, and the drift of the proceedings came to me later in too fragmentary a form to be used as history; but I gathered from Clemens himself that he had done all of the talking, and I think they must have been very pleasant afternoons. Among the acknowledgments that followed one of these affairs is this characteristic word-play from Mrs. Riggs:
N. B.—A lady who is invited to and attends a doe luncheon is, ofcourse, a doe. The question is, if she attends two doe luncheons insuccession is she a doe-doe? If so is she extinct and can neverattend a third?
Luncheons and billiards, however, failed to give sufficient brightness to the dull winter days, or to insure him against an impending bronchial attack, and toward the end of January he sailed away to Bermuda, where skies were bluer and roadsides gay with bloom. His sojourn was brief this time, but long enough to cure him, he said, and he came back full of happiness. He had been driving about over the island with a newly adopted granddaughter, little Margaret Blackmer, whom he had met one morning in the hotel dining-room. A part of his dictated story will convey here this pretty experience.
My first day in Bermuda paid a dividend—in fact a double dividend:it broke the back of my cold and it added a jewel to my collection.As I entered the breakfast-room the first object I saw in thatspacious and far-reaching place was a little girl seated solitary ata table for two. I bent down over her and patted her cheek andsaid:“I don't seem to remember your name; what is it?”By the sparkle in her brown eyes it amused her. She said:“Why, you've never known it, Mr. Clemens, because you've never seenme before.”“Why, that is true, now that I come to think; it certainly is true,and it must be one of the reasons why I have forgotten your name.But I remember it now perfectly—it's Mary.”She was amused again; amused beyond smiling; amused to a chuckle,and she said:“Oh no, it isn't; it's Margaret.”I feigned to be ashamed of my mistake and said:“Ah, well, I couldn't have made that mistake a few years ago; but Iam old, and one of age's earliest infirmities is a damaged memory;but I am clearer now—clearer-headed—it all comes back to me justas if it were yesterday. It's Margaret Holcomb.”She was surprised into a laugh this time, the rippling laugh that ahappy brook makes when it breaks out of the shade into the sunshine,and she said:“Oh, you are wrong again; you don't get anything right. It isn'tHolcomb, it's Blackmer.”I was ashamed again, and confessed it; then:“How old are you, dear?”“Twelve; New-Year's. Twelve and a month.”We were close comrades-inseparables, in fact-for eight days. Everyday we made pedestrian excursions—called them that anyway, andhonestly they were intended for that, and that is what they wouldhave been but for the persistent intrusion of a gray and grave andrough-coated donkey by the name of Maud. Maud was four feet long;she was mounted on four slender little stilts, and had ears thatdoubled her altitude when she stood them up straight. Her tenderwas a little bit of a cart with seat room for two in it, and youcould fall out of it without knowing it, it was so close to theground. This battery was in command of a nice, grave, dignified,gentlefaced little black boy whose age was about twelve, and whosename, for some reason or other, was Reginald. Reginald and Maud—Ishall not easily forget those names, nor the combination they stoodfor. The trips going and coming were five or six miles, and itgenerally took us three hours to make it. This was because Maud setthe pace. Whenever she detected an ascending grade she respectedit; she stopped and said with her ears:“This is getting unsatisfactory. We will camp here.”The whole idea of these excursions was that Margaret and I shouldemploy them for the gathering of strength, by walking, yet we wereoftener in the cart than out of it. She drove and I superintended.In the course of the first excursions I found a beautiful littleshell on the beach at Spanish Point; its hinge was old and dry, andthe two halves came apart in my hand. I gave one of them toMargaret and said:“Now dear, sometime or other in the future I shall run across yousomewhere, and it may turn out that it is not you at all, but willbe some girl that only resembles you. I shall be saying to myself'I know that this is a Margaret by the look of her, but I don't knowfor sure whether this is my Margaret or somebody else's'; but, nomatter, I can soon find out, for I shall take my half shell out ofmy pocket and say, 'I think you are my Margaret, but I am notcertain; if you are my Margaret you can produce the other half ofthis shell.'”Next morning when I entered the breakfast-room and saw the child Iapproached and scanned her searchingly all over, then said, sadly:“No, I am mistaken; it looks like my Margaret,—but it isn't, and Iam so sorry. I shall go away and cry now.”Her eyes danced triumphantly, and she cried out:“No, you don't have to. There!” and she fetched out the identifyingshell.I was beside myself with gratitude and joyful surprise, and revealedit from every pore. The child could not have enjoyed this thrillinglittle drama more if we had been playing it on the stage. Manytimes afterward she played the chief part herself, pretending to bein doubt as to my identity and challenging me to produce my half ofthe shell. She was always hoping to catch me without it, but Ialways defeated that game—wherefore she came to recognize at lastthat I was not only old, but very smart.
Sometimes, when they were not walking or driving, they sat on the veranda, and he prepared history-lessons for little Margaret by making grotesque figures on cards with numerous legs and arms and other fantastic symbols end features to fix the length of some king's reign. For William the Conqueror, for instance, who reigned twenty-one years, he drew a figure of eleven legs and ten arms. It was the proper method of impressing facts upon the mind of a child. It carried him back to those days at Elmira when he had arranged for his own little girls the game of kings. A Miss Wallace, a friend of Margaret's, and usually one of the pedestrian party, has written a dainty book of those Bermudian days.—[Mark Twain and the Happy Islands, by Elizabeth Wallace.]
Miss Wallace says: