[1335]Anastasius,QuaestioXXII., in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.Vol.LXXXIX.288.[1336]Known also asτὸ ζεστόν(‘the warming’) according to Bybilakis,Neugriech. Leben, p. 67.[1337]According to Bybilakis,loc. cit., in the dead man’s house. This, naturally, would be the usual case.[1338]p. 321. 25.[1339]Hence it is probable that the ancientπερίδειπνονalso was conducted on the principle of theἔρανος.[1340]Hom.Il.XXIII.170. Cf. also the use ofμελίκρατον, Hom.Od.XI.27, and Eur.Or.115. Cf. also Aesch.Pers.614.[1341]Ar.Lys.599 ff.[1342]In some villages of Chios, the diminutiveψυχοπῆττιor a wordψύτσηis used (Κωνστ. Κανελλάκης, Χιακὰ Ἀνάλεκτα, p. 337). The commoner formψυχόπητταis that of Crete (cf. Bybilakis,op. cit.p. 69), Kasos, and other Asiatic islands (Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17) etc.[1343]See above, pp.486-7.[1344]Called respectivelyτρίμερα,ἐννι̯άμερα, andσαράντα.[1345]Sonnini de Magnoncourt,Voyage en Grèce et en Turquie, Vol.II.p. 153.[1346]Eur.Or.109.[1347]Cf. Suidas s.v.κόλυβα, σῖτος ἑψητός. The spelling withλλis preferable.[1348]The classical meaning ofκόλλυβαwas ‘small coins.’ The scholiast on Aristoph.Plut.768 mentionsκόλλυβαamong theκαταχύσματαthrown over a new slave on his introduction to the household. These consisted mainly of sweetmeats, etc. (cf.op. cit.798) whence apparently Hesychius (s.v.κόλλυβα) explains that word byτρωγάλια. More probably small coins were thrown along with various sweetmeats; for the kindred custom of throwingκαταχύσματαover a bride on her entry into her new home has continued down to the present day, and these certainly now comprise small change as well as sticky edibles.[1349]Gregorovius,Wanderings in Corsica, etc.(tr. Muir),II.p. 46.[1350]Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17.Ἰ. Σ. Ἀρχέλαος, ἡ Σινασός, p. 92.[1351]Cf. Bybilakis,Neugriechisches Leben, p. 67.[1352]Plutarch,Vita Solon.cap. 21.[1353]Thucyd.III.58. 4.[1354]See above, p.345.[1355]This occurred in old time in the case of heroes, whose offerings are calledἐναγίσματαandχοαί, like those of other dead men; but since the state and not the individual provided for them, the gifts were made not for a time only, but regularly year after year.[1356]See above, pp.487f.[1357]As opposed, in correct speech, toνεκροταφεῖον, the place of preliminary interment. But the two terms are often confused.[1358]Il.XI.241.[1359]Hes.W. and D.116.[1360]e.g. Hom.Il.XVI.454 and 672;XIV.231.[1361]Hes.Theog.212, 756.[1362]See Preller,Griech. Myth.I.690 ff.[1363]Paus.V.18. 1. Cf.III.18. 1.[1364]Passow,Popul. Carm.CCCXCVI.[1365]Hom.Od.XXIV.1.[1366]Virg.Aen.IV.242 ff.[1367]See above, pp.96ff. and pp.134ff.[1368]Paus.VIII.2. 5.[1369]Paus.ibid.§ 4.[1370]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 364.[1371]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 374.[1372]The wordχαρὰ, (‘joy’), as I have pointed out elsewhere, is indeed often used technically of marriage.[1373]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 38 (ll. 13–18) and also nos. 65, 152, 180.[1374]See above, pp.255ff.[1375]Abbott,Macedon. Folklore, p. 255.[1376]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 370. The phraseκάνει χαρὰ, which I have inadequately rendered as ‘maketh glad,’ is technically used of marriage. See above, p.127.[1377]For authorities see Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 76 ff.[1378]Soph.Antig.574–5. I do not know how much stress may be laid on the repetition of the pronounὅδεin these two lines (viz.στερήσεις τῆσδεandτούσδε τοὺς γάμους); but the lines follow closely on that in which Creon bids Ismene speak no more of Antigone asἥδε, and an ironical stress might well be laid by Creon on the wordτούσδεas he uses it, which would suggest to his audience its antithesisτοὺς ἐκεὶ γάμους.[1379]Soph.Antig.804–5.[1380]ibid.810–16.[1381]ibid.891–2.[1382]ibid.1203–7.[1383]ibid.1240–1.[1384]Pindar,Fragm.139 (Bergk).[1385]Aesch.Prom.940 ff.[1386]Oneirocr.II.49. The wordτέληdenotes here not merely a ‘rite,’ but a ‘consummation’ by which a man becomesτέλειος. See below, p.591.[1387]ibid.I.80. To translate the passage more fully is not convenient; I append the original:θεῷ δὲ ἢ θεᾷ μιγῆναι ἢ ὑπὸ θεοῦ περανθῆναι νοσοῦντι μὲν θάνατον σημαίνει· τότε γὰρ ἡ ψυχὴ τὰς τῶν θεῶν συνόδους τε καὶ μίξεις μαντεύεται, ὅταν ἐγγὺς ᾖ τοῦ καταλιπεῖν τὸ σῶμα ᾧ ἐνοικεῖ.[1388]ibid.II.65.[1389]Oneirocr.II.49.[1390]The majority of the references to ancient usage given below are borrowed from Becker’sCharicles.[1391]Thuc.II.15.[1392]Eur.Phoen.347.[1393]Aeschines,Epist.X.p. 680.[1394]Cf. Pollux,III.43.[1395]Soph.Antig.901.[1396]De Luctu, 11.[1397]Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.[1398]For a discussion of this point see Becker,Chariclespp. 483–4.[1399]Harpocrat. s.v.λουτροφόρος.ἔθος δὲ ἦν καὶ τοῖς ἀγάμοις ἀποθανοῦσι λουτροφορεῖν, καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ μνῆμα ἐφίστασθαι. τοῦτο δὲ ἦν παῖς ὑδρίαν ἔχων.The same words are repeated by Photius and Suidas. Withἐφίστασθαιit appears necessary to supplyλουτροφόρον. Cf. PolluxVIII.66τῶν δ’ ἀγάμων λουτροφόρος τῷ μνήματι ἐφίστατο, κόρη ἀγγεῖον ἔχουσα ὑδροφόρον.... For other references see Becker,Chariclesp. 484. This information, as regards the emblem used, is held to be incorrect. Theλουτροφόροςwas not a boy bearing a pitcher, but the pitcher itself. See Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 388.[1400]For this view see Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 389. ‘It may be suggested that originally the custom of placing a water-pitcher on the grave of unmarried persons ... may have been meant to help them to obtain in another world the happiness they had missed in this. In fact it may have been part of a ceremony designed to provide the dead maiden or bachelor with a spouse in the spirit land. Such ceremonies have been observed in various parts of the world by peoples, who, like the Greeks, esteemed it a great misfortune to die unmarried.’[1401]Plut.529.[1402]Cf. Lucian,de Luctu11.[1403]For a discussion of the point in relation to funerals see Becker,Chariclespp. 385 f. and in relation to marriage pp. 486 f.[1404]Lucian,de Luctu11.[1405]I.6.[1406]Cf. Passow,Popul. Carm. Graec. Recent.no. 415, and Tournefort,Voyage du Levant,I.p. 153, who describes a dead woman, whose funeral he witnessed, as ‘parée à la Gréque de ses habits de nôces.’[1407]Passow,Popul. Carm.378.[1408]Chariclesp. 487.[1409]Lucian,de Luctu11. Aristoph.Lysist.602 etc.[1410]The influence of the Church was against the use of garlands in early times and perhaps suppressed it in some districts. Cf. Minucius, p. 109 ‘Nec mortuos coronamus. Ergo vos (the heathen) in hoc magis miror, quemadmodum tribuatis exanimi aut [non] sentienti facem aut non sentienti coronam: cum et beatus non egeat, et miser non gaudeat floribus.’ The firstnonis clearly to be deleted.[1411]Cf. Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.[1412]Cf.ibid.p. 197.[1413]Hom.Hymn. in Demet.372 ff. Hence the pomegranate was treated as ‘an accursed thing’ in the worship of Demeter at Lycosura, Paus.VIII.37. 7.[1414]Paus.II.17. 4.[1415]See above, p.548.[1416]See above, p.80.[1417]The following references are in the main taken from Lobeck,Aglaophamus.[1418]Soph.Fragm.719 (Dind.).[1419]Hom.Hymn. ad Cer.480 ff.[1420]Pind.Fragm.137 (Bergk).[1421]Id.Fragm.129. See above, p.518.[1422]Aristoph.Ranae440–459.[1423]Isocr.Paneg.p. 46.[1424]Aglaoph.I.p. 70.[1425]περὶ εἰρήνης, p. 166.[1426]Aristid.Eleusin.259 (454).[1427]Julian.Or.VII.238. The same story in similar words recurs in Diog. Laert.VI.39 and Plut.de Aud. Poet.II.p. 21F.[1428]Crinagoras,Ep.XXX.[1429]Cic.de Leg.II.§ 36.[1430]Mathem.I.p. 18, ed. Buller.[1431]Aglaoph.I.pp. 39 f.[1432]See Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 6 ff.[1433]Diodorus, v. 77. Cf. Miss Harrison,Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 567.[1434]For references on this point, see Lobeck,Aglaophamus,I.14 ff.[1435]For the evidence that the Achaeans adopted the language of the Pelasgians, and notvice versâ, see Ridgeway,Early Age of Greece, vol.I.p. 631 ff.[1436]Protrept.§ 55.[1437]Hom.Il.I.221 f.[1438]Euseb.Demonstr. Evang.V.1, 268E.[1439]Praep. Evang.XV.1, 788C.[1440]Προτρεπτ.§ 61.[1441]Synes.de Prov.II.124B.[1442]Cf. Artemid.Oneirocr.BkIII.cap. 61.[1443]In Thera, as I myself witnessed, and until recently at Delphi. Greeks with whom I have spoken of this custom have often seen or heard of it somewhere.[1444]I regret that my notes contain no mention of my informant’s name. I must apologise to him for the omission.[1445]Asterius,Encom. in SS. Martyr.in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.vol.XL.p. 324.[1446]Adv. Valentin.cap.I.[1447]Eusebius,Hist. Eccles.IV.11. Cf. Sainte-Croix,Recherches sur les Mystères, 2nd ed.,I.p. 366.[1448]loc. cit.[1449][Origen]Philosophumena, p. 115 (ed. Miller), p. 170 (ed. Cruice). Cf. Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 549.[1450]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.18.[1451]Dieterich,Eine Mithras-Liturgie, p. 125, cited by Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 155, note 3.[1452]Hesiod,Theog.970 f. Cf. Hom.Od.V.125.[1453]Theocr.Id.III.49 ff. (A. Lang’s translation).[1454]Plutarch,de fac. in orb. lun.28, cited by Miss Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 267.[1455]See above, pp.91f. and96ff.[1456]Theocr.Id.III.46 ff.[1457]Protrept.§ 14.[1458]Theocr.Id.XV.86.[1459]Orph. Hymn.LVI.; Bion,Id.I.5. 54; Lucian,Dial. deor.XI.1; Macrob.Saturn.I.21; Procop.in Esai.XVIII.p. 258. Cf. Lenormant,Monogr. de la voie sacrée éleusin., where many other references are given.[1460]Dem.Κατὰ Νεαίρας, pp. 1369–1371et passim. Cf. Arist.Ἀθην. Πολ.3.[1461]Etymol. Mag.227. 36.[1462]Hesych. s.v.γεραραί.[1463]See above, pp.339ff.[1464]Plutarch,de defectu orac.cap. 14 (p. 417).[1465]See above, p.139.[1466]Not so, however, to Artemidorus. Cf.Oneirocr.I.80.[1467]Protrept.§ 34.[1468]l. c.[1469]Protrept.§ 16.[1470]Theophr.Char.28 (ed. Jebb).[1471]l. c.[1472]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.15.[1473]The cymbal certainly belonged to Demeter also (see Miss Harrison,op. cit.p. 562) but not, I think, the kettle-drum.[1474]Psellus (Quaenam sunt Graecorum opiniones de daemonibus, 3, ed. Migne) refers the formulary to the rites of Demeter and Kore. But I cannot agree with Miss J. Harrison (Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 569) as to the importance of Psellus’ testimony in any respect. He appears to me to give no more than arésuméof information derived from Clement’sProtreptica, misunderstood and even more confused.[1475]Paus.II.17. 3.[1476]Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.p. 536, commenting onPhilosophumena, ed. Cruice, v. 3.[1477]A title under which both Zeus and Hermes were known; see Aristoph.Pax, 42, and Schol.ibid.649.[1478]Clem. Alex.Protrept.§ 54.[1479]Athen.VI.p. 253A. Shortly afterwards he quotes a song (253D) in which it is the name of Demeter which is coupled with that of Demetrius.[1480]Athen.VI.253A, and 261B.[1481]Glycon was Alexander’s new god, a re-incarnation of Asclepius, born in the form of a snake out of an egg discovered by Alexander.[1482]A superstitious old Roman entrapped by Alexander.[1483]Lucian,Alexander seu Pseudomantis, cap. 38–39 (II.244 ff.).[1484]See Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.pp. 549 ff.
[1335]Anastasius,QuaestioXXII., in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.Vol.LXXXIX.288.
[1335]Anastasius,QuaestioXXII., in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.Vol.LXXXIX.288.
[1336]Known also asτὸ ζεστόν(‘the warming’) according to Bybilakis,Neugriech. Leben, p. 67.
[1336]Known also asτὸ ζεστόν(‘the warming’) according to Bybilakis,Neugriech. Leben, p. 67.
[1337]According to Bybilakis,loc. cit., in the dead man’s house. This, naturally, would be the usual case.
[1337]According to Bybilakis,loc. cit., in the dead man’s house. This, naturally, would be the usual case.
[1338]p. 321. 25.
[1338]p. 321. 25.
[1339]Hence it is probable that the ancientπερίδειπνονalso was conducted on the principle of theἔρανος.
[1339]Hence it is probable that the ancientπερίδειπνονalso was conducted on the principle of theἔρανος.
[1340]Hom.Il.XXIII.170. Cf. also the use ofμελίκρατον, Hom.Od.XI.27, and Eur.Or.115. Cf. also Aesch.Pers.614.
[1340]Hom.Il.XXIII.170. Cf. also the use ofμελίκρατον, Hom.Od.XI.27, and Eur.Or.115. Cf. also Aesch.Pers.614.
[1341]Ar.Lys.599 ff.
[1341]Ar.Lys.599 ff.
[1342]In some villages of Chios, the diminutiveψυχοπῆττιor a wordψύτσηis used (Κωνστ. Κανελλάκης, Χιακὰ Ἀνάλεκτα, p. 337). The commoner formψυχόπητταis that of Crete (cf. Bybilakis,op. cit.p. 69), Kasos, and other Asiatic islands (Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17) etc.
[1342]In some villages of Chios, the diminutiveψυχοπῆττιor a wordψύτσηis used (Κωνστ. Κανελλάκης, Χιακὰ Ἀνάλεκτα, p. 337). The commoner formψυχόπητταis that of Crete (cf. Bybilakis,op. cit.p. 69), Kasos, and other Asiatic islands (Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17) etc.
[1343]See above, pp.486-7.
[1343]See above, pp.486-7.
[1344]Called respectivelyτρίμερα,ἐννι̯άμερα, andσαράντα.
[1344]Called respectivelyτρίμερα,ἐννι̯άμερα, andσαράντα.
[1345]Sonnini de Magnoncourt,Voyage en Grèce et en Turquie, Vol.II.p. 153.
[1345]Sonnini de Magnoncourt,Voyage en Grèce et en Turquie, Vol.II.p. 153.
[1346]Eur.Or.109.
[1346]Eur.Or.109.
[1347]Cf. Suidas s.v.κόλυβα, σῖτος ἑψητός. The spelling withλλis preferable.
[1347]Cf. Suidas s.v.κόλυβα, σῖτος ἑψητός. The spelling withλλis preferable.
[1348]The classical meaning ofκόλλυβαwas ‘small coins.’ The scholiast on Aristoph.Plut.768 mentionsκόλλυβαamong theκαταχύσματαthrown over a new slave on his introduction to the household. These consisted mainly of sweetmeats, etc. (cf.op. cit.798) whence apparently Hesychius (s.v.κόλλυβα) explains that word byτρωγάλια. More probably small coins were thrown along with various sweetmeats; for the kindred custom of throwingκαταχύσματαover a bride on her entry into her new home has continued down to the present day, and these certainly now comprise small change as well as sticky edibles.
[1348]The classical meaning ofκόλλυβαwas ‘small coins.’ The scholiast on Aristoph.Plut.768 mentionsκόλλυβαamong theκαταχύσματαthrown over a new slave on his introduction to the household. These consisted mainly of sweetmeats, etc. (cf.op. cit.798) whence apparently Hesychius (s.v.κόλλυβα) explains that word byτρωγάλια. More probably small coins were thrown along with various sweetmeats; for the kindred custom of throwingκαταχύσματαover a bride on her entry into her new home has continued down to the present day, and these certainly now comprise small change as well as sticky edibles.
[1349]Gregorovius,Wanderings in Corsica, etc.(tr. Muir),II.p. 46.
[1349]Gregorovius,Wanderings in Corsica, etc.(tr. Muir),II.p. 46.
[1350]Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17.Ἰ. Σ. Ἀρχέλαος, ἡ Σινασός, p. 92.
[1350]Πρωτόδικος, περὶ τῆς παρ’ ἡμῖν ταφῆς, p. 17.Ἰ. Σ. Ἀρχέλαος, ἡ Σινασός, p. 92.
[1351]Cf. Bybilakis,Neugriechisches Leben, p. 67.
[1351]Cf. Bybilakis,Neugriechisches Leben, p. 67.
[1352]Plutarch,Vita Solon.cap. 21.
[1352]Plutarch,Vita Solon.cap. 21.
[1353]Thucyd.III.58. 4.
[1353]Thucyd.III.58. 4.
[1354]See above, p.345.
[1354]See above, p.345.
[1355]This occurred in old time in the case of heroes, whose offerings are calledἐναγίσματαandχοαί, like those of other dead men; but since the state and not the individual provided for them, the gifts were made not for a time only, but regularly year after year.
[1355]This occurred in old time in the case of heroes, whose offerings are calledἐναγίσματαandχοαί, like those of other dead men; but since the state and not the individual provided for them, the gifts were made not for a time only, but regularly year after year.
[1356]See above, pp.487f.
[1356]See above, pp.487f.
[1357]As opposed, in correct speech, toνεκροταφεῖον, the place of preliminary interment. But the two terms are often confused.
[1357]As opposed, in correct speech, toνεκροταφεῖον, the place of preliminary interment. But the two terms are often confused.
[1358]Il.XI.241.
[1358]Il.XI.241.
[1359]Hes.W. and D.116.
[1359]Hes.W. and D.116.
[1360]e.g. Hom.Il.XVI.454 and 672;XIV.231.
[1360]e.g. Hom.Il.XVI.454 and 672;XIV.231.
[1361]Hes.Theog.212, 756.
[1361]Hes.Theog.212, 756.
[1362]See Preller,Griech. Myth.I.690 ff.
[1362]See Preller,Griech. Myth.I.690 ff.
[1363]Paus.V.18. 1. Cf.III.18. 1.
[1363]Paus.V.18. 1. Cf.III.18. 1.
[1364]Passow,Popul. Carm.CCCXCVI.
[1364]Passow,Popul. Carm.CCCXCVI.
[1365]Hom.Od.XXIV.1.
[1365]Hom.Od.XXIV.1.
[1366]Virg.Aen.IV.242 ff.
[1366]Virg.Aen.IV.242 ff.
[1367]See above, pp.96ff. and pp.134ff.
[1367]See above, pp.96ff. and pp.134ff.
[1368]Paus.VIII.2. 5.
[1368]Paus.VIII.2. 5.
[1369]Paus.ibid.§ 4.
[1369]Paus.ibid.§ 4.
[1370]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 364.
[1370]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 364.
[1371]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 374.
[1371]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 374.
[1372]The wordχαρὰ, (‘joy’), as I have pointed out elsewhere, is indeed often used technically of marriage.
[1372]The wordχαρὰ, (‘joy’), as I have pointed out elsewhere, is indeed often used technically of marriage.
[1373]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 38 (ll. 13–18) and also nos. 65, 152, 180.
[1373]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 38 (ll. 13–18) and also nos. 65, 152, 180.
[1374]See above, pp.255ff.
[1374]See above, pp.255ff.
[1375]Abbott,Macedon. Folklore, p. 255.
[1375]Abbott,Macedon. Folklore, p. 255.
[1376]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 370. The phraseκάνει χαρὰ, which I have inadequately rendered as ‘maketh glad,’ is technically used of marriage. See above, p.127.
[1376]Passow,Pop. Carm.no. 370. The phraseκάνει χαρὰ, which I have inadequately rendered as ‘maketh glad,’ is technically used of marriage. See above, p.127.
[1377]For authorities see Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 76 ff.
[1377]For authorities see Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 76 ff.
[1378]Soph.Antig.574–5. I do not know how much stress may be laid on the repetition of the pronounὅδεin these two lines (viz.στερήσεις τῆσδεandτούσδε τοὺς γάμους); but the lines follow closely on that in which Creon bids Ismene speak no more of Antigone asἥδε, and an ironical stress might well be laid by Creon on the wordτούσδεas he uses it, which would suggest to his audience its antithesisτοὺς ἐκεὶ γάμους.
[1378]Soph.Antig.574–5. I do not know how much stress may be laid on the repetition of the pronounὅδεin these two lines (viz.στερήσεις τῆσδεandτούσδε τοὺς γάμους); but the lines follow closely on that in which Creon bids Ismene speak no more of Antigone asἥδε, and an ironical stress might well be laid by Creon on the wordτούσδεas he uses it, which would suggest to his audience its antithesisτοὺς ἐκεὶ γάμους.
[1379]Soph.Antig.804–5.
[1379]Soph.Antig.804–5.
[1380]ibid.810–16.
[1380]ibid.810–16.
[1381]ibid.891–2.
[1381]ibid.891–2.
[1382]ibid.1203–7.
[1382]ibid.1203–7.
[1383]ibid.1240–1.
[1383]ibid.1240–1.
[1384]Pindar,Fragm.139 (Bergk).
[1384]Pindar,Fragm.139 (Bergk).
[1385]Aesch.Prom.940 ff.
[1385]Aesch.Prom.940 ff.
[1386]Oneirocr.II.49. The wordτέληdenotes here not merely a ‘rite,’ but a ‘consummation’ by which a man becomesτέλειος. See below, p.591.
[1386]Oneirocr.II.49. The wordτέληdenotes here not merely a ‘rite,’ but a ‘consummation’ by which a man becomesτέλειος. See below, p.591.
[1387]ibid.I.80. To translate the passage more fully is not convenient; I append the original:θεῷ δὲ ἢ θεᾷ μιγῆναι ἢ ὑπὸ θεοῦ περανθῆναι νοσοῦντι μὲν θάνατον σημαίνει· τότε γὰρ ἡ ψυχὴ τὰς τῶν θεῶν συνόδους τε καὶ μίξεις μαντεύεται, ὅταν ἐγγὺς ᾖ τοῦ καταλιπεῖν τὸ σῶμα ᾧ ἐνοικεῖ.
[1387]ibid.I.80. To translate the passage more fully is not convenient; I append the original:θεῷ δὲ ἢ θεᾷ μιγῆναι ἢ ὑπὸ θεοῦ περανθῆναι νοσοῦντι μὲν θάνατον σημαίνει· τότε γὰρ ἡ ψυχὴ τὰς τῶν θεῶν συνόδους τε καὶ μίξεις μαντεύεται, ὅταν ἐγγὺς ᾖ τοῦ καταλιπεῖν τὸ σῶμα ᾧ ἐνοικεῖ.
[1388]ibid.II.65.
[1388]ibid.II.65.
[1389]Oneirocr.II.49.
[1389]Oneirocr.II.49.
[1390]The majority of the references to ancient usage given below are borrowed from Becker’sCharicles.
[1390]The majority of the references to ancient usage given below are borrowed from Becker’sCharicles.
[1391]Thuc.II.15.
[1391]Thuc.II.15.
[1392]Eur.Phoen.347.
[1392]Eur.Phoen.347.
[1393]Aeschines,Epist.X.p. 680.
[1393]Aeschines,Epist.X.p. 680.
[1394]Cf. Pollux,III.43.
[1394]Cf. Pollux,III.43.
[1395]Soph.Antig.901.
[1395]Soph.Antig.901.
[1396]De Luctu, 11.
[1396]De Luctu, 11.
[1397]Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.
[1397]Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.
[1398]For a discussion of this point see Becker,Chariclespp. 483–4.
[1398]For a discussion of this point see Becker,Chariclespp. 483–4.
[1399]Harpocrat. s.v.λουτροφόρος.ἔθος δὲ ἦν καὶ τοῖς ἀγάμοις ἀποθανοῦσι λουτροφορεῖν, καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ μνῆμα ἐφίστασθαι. τοῦτο δὲ ἦν παῖς ὑδρίαν ἔχων.The same words are repeated by Photius and Suidas. Withἐφίστασθαιit appears necessary to supplyλουτροφόρον. Cf. PolluxVIII.66τῶν δ’ ἀγάμων λουτροφόρος τῷ μνήματι ἐφίστατο, κόρη ἀγγεῖον ἔχουσα ὑδροφόρον.... For other references see Becker,Chariclesp. 484. This information, as regards the emblem used, is held to be incorrect. Theλουτροφόροςwas not a boy bearing a pitcher, but the pitcher itself. See Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 388.
[1399]Harpocrat. s.v.λουτροφόρος.ἔθος δὲ ἦν καὶ τοῖς ἀγάμοις ἀποθανοῦσι λουτροφορεῖν, καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ μνῆμα ἐφίστασθαι. τοῦτο δὲ ἦν παῖς ὑδρίαν ἔχων.The same words are repeated by Photius and Suidas. Withἐφίστασθαιit appears necessary to supplyλουτροφόρον. Cf. PolluxVIII.66τῶν δ’ ἀγάμων λουτροφόρος τῷ μνήματι ἐφίστατο, κόρη ἀγγεῖον ἔχουσα ὑδροφόρον.... For other references see Becker,Chariclesp. 484. This information, as regards the emblem used, is held to be incorrect. Theλουτροφόροςwas not a boy bearing a pitcher, but the pitcher itself. See Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 388.
[1400]For this view see Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 389. ‘It may be suggested that originally the custom of placing a water-pitcher on the grave of unmarried persons ... may have been meant to help them to obtain in another world the happiness they had missed in this. In fact it may have been part of a ceremony designed to provide the dead maiden or bachelor with a spouse in the spirit land. Such ceremonies have been observed in various parts of the world by peoples, who, like the Greeks, esteemed it a great misfortune to die unmarried.’
[1400]For this view see Frazer,Pausanias, vol.v.p. 389. ‘It may be suggested that originally the custom of placing a water-pitcher on the grave of unmarried persons ... may have been meant to help them to obtain in another world the happiness they had missed in this. In fact it may have been part of a ceremony designed to provide the dead maiden or bachelor with a spouse in the spirit land. Such ceremonies have been observed in various parts of the world by peoples, who, like the Greeks, esteemed it a great misfortune to die unmarried.’
[1401]Plut.529.
[1401]Plut.529.
[1402]Cf. Lucian,de Luctu11.
[1402]Cf. Lucian,de Luctu11.
[1403]For a discussion of the point in relation to funerals see Becker,Chariclespp. 385 f. and in relation to marriage pp. 486 f.
[1403]For a discussion of the point in relation to funerals see Becker,Chariclespp. 385 f. and in relation to marriage pp. 486 f.
[1404]Lucian,de Luctu11.
[1404]Lucian,de Luctu11.
[1405]I.6.
[1405]I.6.
[1406]Cf. Passow,Popul. Carm. Graec. Recent.no. 415, and Tournefort,Voyage du Levant,I.p. 153, who describes a dead woman, whose funeral he witnessed, as ‘parée à la Gréque de ses habits de nôces.’
[1406]Cf. Passow,Popul. Carm. Graec. Recent.no. 415, and Tournefort,Voyage du Levant,I.p. 153, who describes a dead woman, whose funeral he witnessed, as ‘parée à la Gréque de ses habits de nôces.’
[1407]Passow,Popul. Carm.378.
[1407]Passow,Popul. Carm.378.
[1408]Chariclesp. 487.
[1408]Chariclesp. 487.
[1409]Lucian,de Luctu11. Aristoph.Lysist.602 etc.
[1409]Lucian,de Luctu11. Aristoph.Lysist.602 etc.
[1410]The influence of the Church was against the use of garlands in early times and perhaps suppressed it in some districts. Cf. Minucius, p. 109 ‘Nec mortuos coronamus. Ergo vos (the heathen) in hoc magis miror, quemadmodum tribuatis exanimi aut [non] sentienti facem aut non sentienti coronam: cum et beatus non egeat, et miser non gaudeat floribus.’ The firstnonis clearly to be deleted.
[1410]The influence of the Church was against the use of garlands in early times and perhaps suppressed it in some districts. Cf. Minucius, p. 109 ‘Nec mortuos coronamus. Ergo vos (the heathen) in hoc magis miror, quemadmodum tribuatis exanimi aut [non] sentienti facem aut non sentienti coronam: cum et beatus non egeat, et miser non gaudeat floribus.’ The firstnonis clearly to be deleted.
[1411]Cf. Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.
[1411]Cf. Abbott,Macedonian Folklore, p. 193.
[1412]Cf.ibid.p. 197.
[1412]Cf.ibid.p. 197.
[1413]Hom.Hymn. in Demet.372 ff. Hence the pomegranate was treated as ‘an accursed thing’ in the worship of Demeter at Lycosura, Paus.VIII.37. 7.
[1413]Hom.Hymn. in Demet.372 ff. Hence the pomegranate was treated as ‘an accursed thing’ in the worship of Demeter at Lycosura, Paus.VIII.37. 7.
[1414]Paus.II.17. 4.
[1414]Paus.II.17. 4.
[1415]See above, p.548.
[1415]See above, p.548.
[1416]See above, p.80.
[1416]See above, p.80.
[1417]The following references are in the main taken from Lobeck,Aglaophamus.
[1417]The following references are in the main taken from Lobeck,Aglaophamus.
[1418]Soph.Fragm.719 (Dind.).
[1418]Soph.Fragm.719 (Dind.).
[1419]Hom.Hymn. ad Cer.480 ff.
[1419]Hom.Hymn. ad Cer.480 ff.
[1420]Pind.Fragm.137 (Bergk).
[1420]Pind.Fragm.137 (Bergk).
[1421]Id.Fragm.129. See above, p.518.
[1421]Id.Fragm.129. See above, p.518.
[1422]Aristoph.Ranae440–459.
[1422]Aristoph.Ranae440–459.
[1423]Isocr.Paneg.p. 46.
[1423]Isocr.Paneg.p. 46.
[1424]Aglaoph.I.p. 70.
[1424]Aglaoph.I.p. 70.
[1425]περὶ εἰρήνης, p. 166.
[1425]περὶ εἰρήνης, p. 166.
[1426]Aristid.Eleusin.259 (454).
[1426]Aristid.Eleusin.259 (454).
[1427]Julian.Or.VII.238. The same story in similar words recurs in Diog. Laert.VI.39 and Plut.de Aud. Poet.II.p. 21F.
[1427]Julian.Or.VII.238. The same story in similar words recurs in Diog. Laert.VI.39 and Plut.de Aud. Poet.II.p. 21F.
[1428]Crinagoras,Ep.XXX.
[1428]Crinagoras,Ep.XXX.
[1429]Cic.de Leg.II.§ 36.
[1429]Cic.de Leg.II.§ 36.
[1430]Mathem.I.p. 18, ed. Buller.
[1430]Mathem.I.p. 18, ed. Buller.
[1431]Aglaoph.I.pp. 39 f.
[1431]Aglaoph.I.pp. 39 f.
[1432]See Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 6 ff.
[1432]See Lobeck,Aglaoph.I.pp. 6 ff.
[1433]Diodorus, v. 77. Cf. Miss Harrison,Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 567.
[1433]Diodorus, v. 77. Cf. Miss Harrison,Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 567.
[1434]For references on this point, see Lobeck,Aglaophamus,I.14 ff.
[1434]For references on this point, see Lobeck,Aglaophamus,I.14 ff.
[1435]For the evidence that the Achaeans adopted the language of the Pelasgians, and notvice versâ, see Ridgeway,Early Age of Greece, vol.I.p. 631 ff.
[1435]For the evidence that the Achaeans adopted the language of the Pelasgians, and notvice versâ, see Ridgeway,Early Age of Greece, vol.I.p. 631 ff.
[1436]Protrept.§ 55.
[1436]Protrept.§ 55.
[1437]Hom.Il.I.221 f.
[1437]Hom.Il.I.221 f.
[1438]Euseb.Demonstr. Evang.V.1, 268E.
[1438]Euseb.Demonstr. Evang.V.1, 268E.
[1439]Praep. Evang.XV.1, 788C.
[1439]Praep. Evang.XV.1, 788C.
[1440]Προτρεπτ.§ 61.
[1440]Προτρεπτ.§ 61.
[1441]Synes.de Prov.II.124B.
[1441]Synes.de Prov.II.124B.
[1442]Cf. Artemid.Oneirocr.BkIII.cap. 61.
[1442]Cf. Artemid.Oneirocr.BkIII.cap. 61.
[1443]In Thera, as I myself witnessed, and until recently at Delphi. Greeks with whom I have spoken of this custom have often seen or heard of it somewhere.
[1443]In Thera, as I myself witnessed, and until recently at Delphi. Greeks with whom I have spoken of this custom have often seen or heard of it somewhere.
[1444]I regret that my notes contain no mention of my informant’s name. I must apologise to him for the omission.
[1444]I regret that my notes contain no mention of my informant’s name. I must apologise to him for the omission.
[1445]Asterius,Encom. in SS. Martyr.in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.vol.XL.p. 324.
[1445]Asterius,Encom. in SS. Martyr.in Migne,Patrolog. Graeco-Lat.vol.XL.p. 324.
[1446]Adv. Valentin.cap.I.
[1446]Adv. Valentin.cap.I.
[1447]Eusebius,Hist. Eccles.IV.11. Cf. Sainte-Croix,Recherches sur les Mystères, 2nd ed.,I.p. 366.
[1447]Eusebius,Hist. Eccles.IV.11. Cf. Sainte-Croix,Recherches sur les Mystères, 2nd ed.,I.p. 366.
[1448]loc. cit.
[1448]loc. cit.
[1449][Origen]Philosophumena, p. 115 (ed. Miller), p. 170 (ed. Cruice). Cf. Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 549.
[1449][Origen]Philosophumena, p. 115 (ed. Miller), p. 170 (ed. Cruice). Cf. Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 549.
[1450]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.18.
[1450]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.18.
[1451]Dieterich,Eine Mithras-Liturgie, p. 125, cited by Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 155, note 3.
[1451]Dieterich,Eine Mithras-Liturgie, p. 125, cited by Miss J. Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 155, note 3.
[1452]Hesiod,Theog.970 f. Cf. Hom.Od.V.125.
[1452]Hesiod,Theog.970 f. Cf. Hom.Od.V.125.
[1453]Theocr.Id.III.49 ff. (A. Lang’s translation).
[1453]Theocr.Id.III.49 ff. (A. Lang’s translation).
[1454]Plutarch,de fac. in orb. lun.28, cited by Miss Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 267.
[1454]Plutarch,de fac. in orb. lun.28, cited by Miss Harrison,Proleg. to Study of Gk Relig.p. 267.
[1455]See above, pp.91f. and96ff.
[1455]See above, pp.91f. and96ff.
[1456]Theocr.Id.III.46 ff.
[1456]Theocr.Id.III.46 ff.
[1457]Protrept.§ 14.
[1457]Protrept.§ 14.
[1458]Theocr.Id.XV.86.
[1458]Theocr.Id.XV.86.
[1459]Orph. Hymn.LVI.; Bion,Id.I.5. 54; Lucian,Dial. deor.XI.1; Macrob.Saturn.I.21; Procop.in Esai.XVIII.p. 258. Cf. Lenormant,Monogr. de la voie sacrée éleusin., where many other references are given.
[1459]Orph. Hymn.LVI.; Bion,Id.I.5. 54; Lucian,Dial. deor.XI.1; Macrob.Saturn.I.21; Procop.in Esai.XVIII.p. 258. Cf. Lenormant,Monogr. de la voie sacrée éleusin., where many other references are given.
[1460]Dem.Κατὰ Νεαίρας, pp. 1369–1371et passim. Cf. Arist.Ἀθην. Πολ.3.
[1460]Dem.Κατὰ Νεαίρας, pp. 1369–1371et passim. Cf. Arist.Ἀθην. Πολ.3.
[1461]Etymol. Mag.227. 36.
[1461]Etymol. Mag.227. 36.
[1462]Hesych. s.v.γεραραί.
[1462]Hesych. s.v.γεραραί.
[1463]See above, pp.339ff.
[1463]See above, pp.339ff.
[1464]Plutarch,de defectu orac.cap. 14 (p. 417).
[1464]Plutarch,de defectu orac.cap. 14 (p. 417).
[1465]See above, p.139.
[1465]See above, p.139.
[1466]Not so, however, to Artemidorus. Cf.Oneirocr.I.80.
[1466]Not so, however, to Artemidorus. Cf.Oneirocr.I.80.
[1467]Protrept.§ 34.
[1467]Protrept.§ 34.
[1468]l. c.
[1468]l. c.
[1469]Protrept.§ 16.
[1469]Protrept.§ 16.
[1470]Theophr.Char.28 (ed. Jebb).
[1470]Theophr.Char.28 (ed. Jebb).
[1471]l. c.
[1471]l. c.
[1472]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.15.
[1472]Clem. Alex.Protrept.II.15.
[1473]The cymbal certainly belonged to Demeter also (see Miss Harrison,op. cit.p. 562) but not, I think, the kettle-drum.
[1473]The cymbal certainly belonged to Demeter also (see Miss Harrison,op. cit.p. 562) but not, I think, the kettle-drum.
[1474]Psellus (Quaenam sunt Graecorum opiniones de daemonibus, 3, ed. Migne) refers the formulary to the rites of Demeter and Kore. But I cannot agree with Miss J. Harrison (Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 569) as to the importance of Psellus’ testimony in any respect. He appears to me to give no more than arésuméof information derived from Clement’sProtreptica, misunderstood and even more confused.
[1474]Psellus (Quaenam sunt Graecorum opiniones de daemonibus, 3, ed. Migne) refers the formulary to the rites of Demeter and Kore. But I cannot agree with Miss J. Harrison (Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, p. 569) as to the importance of Psellus’ testimony in any respect. He appears to me to give no more than arésuméof information derived from Clement’sProtreptica, misunderstood and even more confused.
[1475]Paus.II.17. 3.
[1475]Paus.II.17. 3.
[1476]Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.p. 536, commenting onPhilosophumena, ed. Cruice, v. 3.
[1476]Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.p. 536, commenting onPhilosophumena, ed. Cruice, v. 3.
[1477]A title under which both Zeus and Hermes were known; see Aristoph.Pax, 42, and Schol.ibid.649.
[1477]A title under which both Zeus and Hermes were known; see Aristoph.Pax, 42, and Schol.ibid.649.
[1478]Clem. Alex.Protrept.§ 54.
[1478]Clem. Alex.Protrept.§ 54.
[1479]Athen.VI.p. 253A. Shortly afterwards he quotes a song (253D) in which it is the name of Demeter which is coupled with that of Demetrius.
[1479]Athen.VI.p. 253A. Shortly afterwards he quotes a song (253D) in which it is the name of Demeter which is coupled with that of Demetrius.
[1480]Athen.VI.253A, and 261B.
[1480]Athen.VI.253A, and 261B.
[1481]Glycon was Alexander’s new god, a re-incarnation of Asclepius, born in the form of a snake out of an egg discovered by Alexander.
[1481]Glycon was Alexander’s new god, a re-incarnation of Asclepius, born in the form of a snake out of an egg discovered by Alexander.
[1482]A superstitious old Roman entrapped by Alexander.
[1482]A superstitious old Roman entrapped by Alexander.
[1483]Lucian,Alexander seu Pseudomantis, cap. 38–39 (II.244 ff.).
[1483]Lucian,Alexander seu Pseudomantis, cap. 38–39 (II.244 ff.).
[1484]See Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.pp. 549 ff.
[1484]See Miss J. Harrison,op. cit.pp. 549 ff.