Footnotes.

Footnotes.1–“The Apocalypse ofSt.John, or Prophecy of the Rise, Progress, and Fall of the Church of Rome; the Inquisition; the Revolution in France; a Universal War, and the final triumph of Christianity: being a new interpretation, by theRev.George Croly,A.M., H.R.S.L.”2–P.192.3–Moses Stuart.4–See Supplementary Notes onHeb.vii.5–Author’s Preface,p. vi.6–Stuart on Apocalypse,p.170, Edinburgh, 1847.7–This view of the great philologist has deservedly met with indignant censure, both in this country and in America. “We confess,” saysDr.Beecher of Boston, “that this whole effort to force Nero intochap. xvii.as the wounded beast, savours too much of that German infidelity that regards John as little better than a soothsayer himself, and does not hesitate to affirm that he believes the rumours concerning Nero. Professor Stuart of course abandons this ground, and yet he avers that John spoke as if he believed it. This theory is perfectly consistent in the hands of one who denies the inspiration of John, but it cannot be so grafted on the tree of true Christian interpretation as to appear like one of its true and genuine branches” (Bib. Repos., 1847,p.296). So also Elliott with still greater severity,vol. iv.p.548.8–“The first of these two counter schemes is thePreterists’, which would have the prophecy stop altogether short of the Popedom, explaining it of the catastrophes, one or both, of theJewish nationandPagan Rome; the second, theFuturists’, which would have it all shoot over the head of the Popedom into times yet future” (Elliott,iv.529). The first of these schemes originated with the JesuitAlcassarinA.D.1614; the other with the JesuitRiberainA.D.1585; and it is not a little remarkable, that both originated in the necessities of the Papal cause, oppressed by Protestant interpreters.9–Hierophant,p.242.10–Compare Stuart on Apocalypse, Excursusv., with Davidson’sIntroduction,vol. iii.pp.513, 514.Dr.D. justly complains in his preface of being charged byMr.Elliott with the sin of copying Stuart. Besides the difference mentioned above, there is between the two a difference in regard to the entire scheme of interpretation,Dr.D. condemning the Preterist scheme, of which Professor Stuart is perhaps the ablest supporter. The theory which the latter has put forth on the witnesses meets with unequivocal condemnation in the pages of the former.Dr.D. himself, in the meantime, seems to have no scheme of interpretation. After remarking on the Preterist, Continuous, and Futurist scheme, he says very candidly, “we feel disinclined to support any of the rival hypotheses till they be better supported” (vol. iii.p.627).11–Introduction to the New Testament, by Samuel Davidson,D.D.,vol. iii.p.513.12–Elliott,iv.419.13–Harduin,ix.1808; in Elliott,ii.p.83.14–P.424,et seq.15–Hierophant,p.245.16–Reply to Cunninghame.17–Gen.xl., xli.18–Davidson’sIntroduction,vol. iii.p.520.19–P.343.20–Commentary on Apocalypse,p.790, Edinburgh, 1848; where also are cited the following passages expressly from the prophetic books:Ezek.xxix.11, 12; Jonahiii.4;Isa.vii.8;xvi.4;Jer.xxvii., xxix.21–Stuart’sApocalypse,p.791.22–Dan.x.2, 3.23–Hierophant,p.252.24–Elliott, however, refuses to except the “seven times” specified in Nebuchadnezzar’s vision from the category of chronological prophecies to which the Year-day principle is to be applied. He regards the monarch as the mystical representative of the Assyrian empire, and Babylon, governed by him. “For my own part,” says he, “considering the extraordinary nature of the judgment—the fact of its being so fully recorded by Daniel—the circumstance of Nebuchadnezzar being addressed on occasion of another prophecy as the representative of his nation (‘thou art that head of gold’), and that of the symbolic tree, when cut down, being bound with a band ofbrassandiron, the metals significant of theGreekandRoman empires, which for ages held sway over the prostrate region of Babylon; all these considerations, united with that of the prediction thatAssyriaspecifically is to recover in the latter day from its apostasy (Isa.xix.24, 25), induce me to believe that Nebuchadnezzar’s insanity and degradation typified that of his empire in its apostasy from God; and theseven times360daysthat passed over him in that state, theseven times360, or 2520yearsthat would have to be completed, ere Assyria’s recovery to a sound mind, at the termination of thetimes of the Gentiles.” At the same timeMr.Elliott does not deny the application of the prediction to Nebuchadnezzar as an individual, and remarks, that it is not an uncommon circumstance “for an individual person to be made the subject of a prefigurative vision, and yet himself to prefigure in that very action or character something future.” If, then, we admit the truth of this representation, and set asideDan.x.2, 3 as not a prediction at all, both the passages insisted on by Professor Stuart are in this way removed from the list of exceptions.25–Elements of Prophecy,p.375, andHoræ Apocalyp.,vol. iii.p.250.26–Chap. xiii.25;xiv.34.27–Introduction,p.518.28–Ezek.iv.4–6.29–Stuart’sHints on the Interpretation of Prophecy,pp.76, 78;Apocalypse, Excursusv.30–Davidson’sIntroduction,vol. iii.p.519.31–Hierophant,pp.247, 248.32–Chap. xx.2, 3.33–Davidson’sIntroduction,vol. iii.p.522.34–J. A. Alexander,in loco.35–See theCritici Sacri, Scott, Barnes, Alexander,&c.36–Dan.ix.24–27.37–Tyso, Govett, and Todd.38–Hints on the Interpretation of Prophecy,p.79.39–Hierophant,p.250.40–Davidson’sIntroduction,vol. iii.p.515.41–Mede’sWorks, bookiii.chap. ix.p.599.42–Gen.xxix.27, 28;Lev.xii.5;Exod.xxxiv.22;Deut.xvi.9, twice, and 10;Jer.v.24;Deut.xvi.16;2 Chron.viii.13;Num.xxviii.26.43–Gesenius’Lexicon.44–See margin.45–Chap. ix.5–10.46–Chap. ix.15.47–Horæ Apocalyp.,vol. i.p.489.48–Chap. xi.2.49–Chap. xi.3, 11.50–Chap. xii.6, 14.51–Elements of Prophecy,p.382.52–Chap. xiii.5.53–Comparechap. xiii.withxix.19, 20.54–vii.25;xii.7.55–Stuart’sCommentary.56–Stuart, in theBibliotheca Sacra,pp.353, 354.57–Lu.11:28.58–Ja.5:8, 9;1 Pe.4:7.59–ver.11.60–ver.8.61–ch.3:1; 4:5;Zec.4:10.62–Jn.8:14.63–Col.1:18.64–Jn.13:1.65–He.9:14.66–Ex.19:6;1 Pe.2:5–9.67–He.13:21.68–Da.7:13;Mat.26:64.69–Zec.12:10.70–Mat.24:30.71–ch.22:20.72–Is.41:4.73–Is.9:6.74–2 Co.12:2.75–Jn.20:26;Ac.20:7;1 Co.16:2.76–ch.2:1.77–ch.2:8.78–ch.2:12.79–ch.2:18.80–ch.3:1.81–ch.3:7.82–ch.3:14.83–Ex.25:37;Zec.4:2.84–Eze.1:26–28;Da.7:9, 13; 10:5, 6.85–ch.2:18; 19:12.86–Eze.1:7.87–Eze.43:2.88–Is.49:2;He.4:12.89–ch.10:1;Ac.26:13.90–Ro.6:9.91–ch.20:1, 2;Ps.68:20.92–ver.16.93–Mat.5:15, 16.94–ch.1:16, 20.95–ver.9, 13, 19;ch.3:1, 8, 15;Ps.1:6.96–1 Jn.4:1.97–2 Co.11:13.98–Ga.6:9.99–Je.2:2, 3.100–Mat.21:41, 43.101–ver.15.102–ver.11, 17, 29;Mat.11:15.103–ch.22:2, 14;Ge.2:9.104–ch.1:8, 17.105–1 Ti.6:18.106–Ro.2:28, 29.107–ch.3:9.108–Mat.10:22.109–Ja.1:12.110–ch.20:14.111–ch.1:16.112–ver.9.113–2 Ti.2:12.114–Nu.31:16.115–Ac.15:29.116–1 Co.6:13, 18.117–Is.11:4.118–ver.7;ch.3:6, 13, 22.119–Ps.25:14.120–ch.3:12; 19:12, 13;Is.56:4, 5; 65:15.121–1 Co.2:14.122–ch.1:14, 15.123–ver.2.124–1 Ki.16:31.125–Ex.34:15;1 Co.10:20, 28.126–Ro.2:4;2 Pe.3:9.127–ch.9:20.128–Eze.16:37; 23:29.129–ch.6:8.130–Zep.1:11.131–1 Ch.28:9;2 Ch.6:30;Ps.7:9;Je.17:10.132–Ps.62:12.133–2 Th.2:9–12.134–ch.3:11.135–ver.7, 11, 17;ch.3:5, 12, 21; 21:7.136–Jn.6:29;Ja.2:20.137–Ps.49:14; 149:5–9.138–Ps.2:9.139–ch.22:16.140–ch.5:6.141–ch.2:2,&c.142–1 Ti.5:6.143–ch.2:5.144–Da.5:27.145–He.2:1.146–ver.19.147–ch.16:15.148–ch.7:9; 19:8.149–ch.17:8.150–Lu.12:8.151–Ac.3:14.152–1 Jn.5:20.153–Is.22:22.154–Job 12:14.155–1 Co.16:9.156–ch.2:9.157–Is.60:14.158–2 Pe.2:9.159–Zep.1:14.160–ver.3.161–ch.21:2, 10.162–or,in Laodicea.163–Is.65:16.164–1 Ki.18:21.165–Ho.12:8.166–Is.55:1.167–ch.16:15.168–He.12:5, 6.169–Ca.5:2;Lu.12:36.170–Jn.14:23.171–ch.12:11;1 Jn.5:4, 5.172–Lu.22:30.173–Jn.16:33.174–ch.2:7.175–ch.1:10.176–ch.11:12.177–ch.17:3; 21:10;Eze.3:12–14.178–Is.6:1;Je.17:12;Eze.1:26, 28.179–Da.7:9;He.8:1.180–ch.11:16.181–ch.3:4, 5.182–ver.10.183–ch.8:5; 16:18.184–Ge.15:17;Ex.37:23;Zec.4:2.185–ch.1:4.186–ch.15:2.187–Eze.1:5,&c.; 10:14.188–Is.6:2,&c.189–have no rest.190–ch.5:14.191–ver.4.192–ch.5:12.193–Col.1:16.194–Eze.2:9, 10.195–Is.29:11.196–Ge.49:9, 10;Nu.24:9;He.7:14.197–ch.22:16;Is.11:1, 10.198–Is.53:7;Jn.1:29, 36.199–Zec.4:10.200–ch.4:4, 8, 10.201–ch.15:2.202–or,incense.203–Ps.141:2.204–ch.14:3.205–Ac.20:28;Ep.1:7;He.9:12;1 Pe.1:18, 19.206–ch.7:9.207–ch.1:6.208–ch.22:5.209–Da.7:10;He.12:22.210–ch.4:11.211–Phi.2:10.212–1 Ch.29:11;1 Ti.6:16;1 Pe.4:11.213–ch.19:4.214–ch.5:5.215–Zec.6:3,&c.216–Ps.45:3–5.217–The wordchœnixsignifieth a measure containing one wine quart, and the twelfth part of a quart.218–ch.9:4.219–or,to him.220–Eze.14:21.221–ch.8:3.222–ch.20:4.223–ch.1:9; 12:17.224–Zec.1:12.225–ch.11:18;De.32:41–43.226–ch.7:9, 14.227–ch.14:13.228–He.11:40.229–ch.16:18.230–Joel 2:10, 31; 3:15.231–ch.8:10.232–or,green.233–Ps.102:26;Is.34:4.234–ch.16:20;Je.4:23, 24;Hab.3:6, 10.235–Is.2:19.236–ch.9:6;Ho.10:8;Lu.23:30.237–ch.16:14;Is.13:6,&c.;Zep.1:14,&c.238–Ps.76:7.239–Da.7:2.240–2 Ti.2:19.241–ch.6:6.242–Eze.9:4.243–ch.22:4.244–ch.14:1.245–ch.5:9;Ro.11:25.246–ch.6:11.247–Le.23:40.248–Zec.4:7.249–ch.19:1;Is.43:11.250–ch.5:13, 14; Jude 25.251–ch.6:9;Jn.16:33.252–1 Co.6:11;He.9:14.253–ch.1:5;1 Jn.1:7.254–ch.21:3, 4.255–Is.49:10.256–Ps.121:6;Is.4:6.257–Ps.23:1, 2, 5; 36:8;Is.40:11.258–Is.25:8.259–ch.5:1.260–Lu.1:19.261–2 Ch.29:25–28.262–or,additto.263–ch.5:8.264–ch.6:9.265–Ex.30:1.266–or,upon.267–ch.16:18.268–2 Sa.22:8.269–Eze.38:22.270–Is.2:13.271–Ingentem meminit parvo qui germine quercumÆquævumque videt consenuisse nemus.A neighbouring wood born with himself he seesAnd loves his old contemporary trees.—Cowley.272–Je.51:25.273–Am.7:4.274–ch.16:3,&c.;Ex.7:19–21.275–ch.9:1;Is.14:12.276–De.29:18;Am.5:7;He.12:15.277–Ex.15:23;Jer.9:15; 23:15.278–Is.13:10;Je.4:23;Eze.32:7, 8; Joel 2:10;Am.8:9.279–“If we were called on to fix a period most calamitous, it would be that from the death of Theodosius to the establishment of the Lombards” (CharlesVpp.11, 12).280–ch.14:6.281–ch.8:10;Lu.10:18.282–ch.17:8; 20:1.283–Joel 2:2.284–Ex.10:4,&c.285–ver.10.286–ch.6:6.287–ch.7:3;Ex.12:23; Job 2:6;Eze.9:4.288–Job 3:21;Je.8:3.289–Joel 2:4.290–Na.3:17.291–Da.7:4, 8.292–Ps.57:4; Joel 1:6.293–Na.2:4.294–ver.5.295–Ep.2:2.296–That is,a destroyer.297–Fœmineas incisas facies præferentes, virorum et bene barbatorum fugientia terga confodiunt.298–ch.8:13.299–ch.16:12;Ge.2:14;Je.51:63.300–or,at.301–ch.8:7–9.302–Eze.38:4;Da.11:40.303–Ps.68:17.304–ch.7:4.305–1 Ch.12:8;Is.5:28, 29.306–Is.9:15;Ep.4:14.307–Je.5:3; 8:6.308–Le.17:7;1 Co.10:20.309–Ps.135:15;Is.40:19, 20.310–ch.22:15.311–“As the Julian year equalled 365 days 6 hours, the Apocalyptic period would, on the year-day principle, be in amount as follows:—A year=3651⁄4days=365years+1⁄4yr.A month=30days=30years.A day==1year.396years.1⁄4of a prophetic day or year (left out above) = 911⁄4days.An hour =1⁄24of a prophetic day or year = 151⁄6days.Total = years 396 + 106 days.”Elliott,i.p.496.312–Mandat Chalifa tuæ curæ omne id terrarum quod Deus ejus curæ et imperio commisit; tibique civium piorum, fidelium, Deum colentium, tutclam sublocatorio nomine demandat.313–In the Hereford Discussion, between theRev.J. Venn andRev.James Waterworth, it was admitted by the latter, an able and learned Romish priest, that Bonaventura’s Psalter to the Virgin Mary, turning the addresses to God into addresses to the Virgin, wasblasphemy(Elliott,ii.25).314–Romanus Pontifex viros claros, et qui sanctimoniâ floruerunt, et eorum exigentibus clarissimis meritis aliorum sanctorum numero aggregari mereritur—inter sanctos prædictos debet collocare, et ut sanctos ab omnibus Christi fidelibuscoli,venerari, etADORARImandare.315–“If you wish to see the horrors of these ages” (the Middle Ages), says Chateaubriand,Dict. Hist.tom. iii.420, “read theCouncils.”316–His character is told in the well-known epigram—Octonocenspueros genuit, totidemque puellas:Hunc merito potuit dicere Romapatrem.317–Eze.1:28.318–ch. 1:15, 16;Mat.17:2.319–For the proof of this, see Elliott,ii.92.320–ch.8:5; 14:2.321–Da.8:26; 12:4, 9.322–Ex.6:8;De.32:40.323–ch.14:7;Ne.9:6.324–Da.12:6, 7.325–ch.11:15.326–Ro.11:25;Ep.3:5–9.327–ver.4.328–Eze.3:1–3, 14.329–ch.21:15;Zec.2:1.330–Eze.xl.–xlviii.331–Eze.40:17–20.332–cast out.333–Lu.21:24.334–Da.7:25.335–or,give unto my two witnesses that they may prophesy.336–Mat.18:16.337–ch.20:4.338–Is.22:12.339–Je.11:16;Zec.4:3, 11, 14.340–ch.1:20.341–Ps.18:8.342–Nu.16:35;Ho.6:5.343–1 Ki.17:1.344–Ex.7:19.345–ch.17:8.346–Da.7:21;Zec.14:2,&c.347–He.13:12.348–Is.1:10.349–Ex.20:2.350–Ps.79:3.351–Eze.37:5–14.352–1 Th.4:17.353–Mal.3:18.354–ch.16:19.355–names of men.356–ch.14:7;Is.26:15, 16.357–ch.8:13.358–“An old Welsh Chronicle preserved at Cambridge says, ‘After that by means of Austin the Saxons became Christians, in such sort as Austin had taught them, the Britons would not either eat or drink with or salute them; because they corrupted withsuperstition,images, andidolatry, the true religion of Christ.’” Cited in Hearn’Man of Sin,p.21.—Elliott.359–ch.10:7.360–ch.12:10.361–Da.2:44; 7:14, 18:27.362–ch.4:4.363–ch.16:5.364–ch.19:6365–ver.9.366–He.9:27.367–ch.22:12.368–ch.19:5.369–or,corrupt.370–ch.15:5, 8.371–ch.8:5.372–ch.16:18, 21.373–or,sign.374–Is.54:6.375–Ps.84:11;Mal.4:2.376–or,sign.377–ver.9.378–Is.9:15.379–Is.7:14.380–Ps.2:9.381–ch.11:3.382–Ge.3:1, 4.383–Jn.8:44.384–Zec.3:1.385–ch.11:15.386–Ro.8:33, 37.387–Lu.14:26.388–Ps.96:11;Is.49:13.389–ch.8:13.390–ch.10:6.391–Is.40:31.392–An affecting instance of this kind—perhaps one of many cases that existed—is mentioned by D’Aubigné (booki.p.79,Eng.trans.), which came to light on the pulling down, in the year 1776, of an old building that had formed a part of the Carthusian convent at Basle. A poor Carthusian brother, by the name of Martin, had written the following confession, which he had placed in a wooden box, and inclosed in a hole which he had made in the wall of his cell, where it was found:—“O most merciful God, I know that I can only be saved, and satisfy thy righteousness, by the merit, the innocent suffering, and death of thy well-beloved Son. Holy Jesus! my salvation is in thy hands. Thou canst not withdraw the hands of thy love from me; for they have created and redeemed me. Thou hast inscribed my name with a pen of iron in rich mercy, and so as nothing can efface it, on thy side, thy hands, and thy feet,”&c.393–Is.59:19.394–Ge.3:15.395–Da.7:2,&c.396–ch.12:3; 17:3, 9, 12.397–or,names.398–Da.7:4–7.399–ch.12:9.400–ch.16:10.401–slain.402–ch.17:8.403–ch.17:14.404–Da.7:8, 11, 25; 11:36.405–make war.406–ch.11:2, 3; 12:6.407–Col.2:9;He.9:11, 24.408–He.12:22, 23.409–ch.11:7; 12:17;Da.7:21.410–Lu.4:6.411–ch.21:27;Da.12:1.412–ch.17:8.413–Is.33:1.414–Ge.9:6.415–He.6:12.416–ch.11:7.417–ver.3.418–Mat.24:24;2 Th.2:9, 10.419–ver.3, 12.420–breath.421–ch.16:2422–give them.423–Among the Romans, slaves were stigmatized with the master’s name or mark on their foreheads. So Valerius Maximus speaks of the custom for slaves, “literarum notis inuri;” and Plautus calls the slave “literatus.” Ambrose (De Obit. Valentin.) says,Charactere Domini inscribuntur servuli. Petronius mentions the forehead as the place of the mark;Servitia ecce in frontibus cernitis. In many cases, soldiers bore the emperor’s name or mark imprinted on the hand. Actius says,Stigmata vocant quæ in facie, vel in aliâ parte corporis, inscribuntur; qualia sunt militum in manibus.So Ambrose says,Nomine imperatoris signantur milites.Comp.Notes onGal.vi.17.424–ch.15:2.425–ch.5:12.426–ch.7:4.427–ch.3:12.428–ch.19:6.429–ch.5:8, 9.430–ch.15:3.431–ver.1.432–Ca.1:3; 6:8;2 Co.11:2.433–Jn.10:27.434–bought,1 Co.6:20.435–Ja.1:18.436–Ps.32:2.437–Ep.5:27; Jude 24.438–2 Sa.23:5;Is.40:8.439–Ep.3:9.440–ch.15:4.441–ch.18:2, 3;Is.21:9;Je.51:7, 8.442–ch.13:14–16.443–Ps.75:8.444–ch.19:20.445–Is.34:10.446–Is.57:20, 21.447–1 Th.4:14, 16.448–or,from henceforth saith the Spirit, Yea.449–Eze.1:26;Da.7:13.450–Joel 3:13.451–Je.51:33;Mat.13:39.452–or,dried.453–ver.15.454–ch.19:15.455–Is.63:3.456–He.13:11, 12.457–Is.34:7.458–ch.19:14.459–ch.14:10.460–ch.4:6.461–Is.4:4, 5.462–ch.13:15–17.463–ch.14:2.464–Ex.15:1–19;De.32:1–43.465–ch.14:3.466–Ho.14:9.467–or,nations, orages,ch.17:14.468–Je.10:7.469–1 Sa.2:2.470–Is.45:23.471–ch.11:19.472–Is.6:4.473–Ps.29:9.474–ch.15:1, 7.475–ch.8:7.476–Ex.9:8–11.477–ch.13:15–17.478–ch.8:8.479–Ex.7:17–20.480–ch.8:10.481–ver.7.482–De.32:42, 43;Is.49:26.483–ch.15:3; 19:2.484–ch.8:12.485–ch.9:17.486–or,burned.487–ver.11, 21.488–ch.9:20;Da.5:22, 23.489–ch.13:2–4.490–ch.9:2.491–ver.2.492–In this connection, I may insert here the remarkable calculation of Robert Fleming, in his work, entitled,Apocalyptical Key, orThe Pouring Out of the Vials, first published in 1701. It is in the following words:—“The fifth vial (ver.10, 11), which is to be poured outon the seat of the beast, or the dominions which more immediately belong to, and depend on, the Roman see; that, I say, this judgment will probably begin about the year 1794, and expire aboutA.D.1848; or that the duration of it upon this supposition will be the space of fifty-four years. For I do suppose that, seeing the pope received the title of Supreme Bishop no sooner thanA.D.606, he cannot be supposed to have any vial poured upon his seat immediately (so as to ruin his authority so signally as this judgment must be supposed to do)until the year 1848, which is the date of the twelve hundred and sixty years in prophetical account, when they are reckoned fromA.D.606. But yet we are not to imagine that this will totally destroy the Papacy (though it will exceedingly weaken it), for we find that still in being and alive when the next vial is poured out” [pp.124, 125, Cobbin’s edition]. It is a circumstance remarkably in accordance with this calculation, that in the year 1848 the pope was actually driven away to Gaeta, and that at the present time (1851) he is restored, though evidently with diminished power.493–ch.9:14.494–Is.42:15;Je.50:38; 51:36.495–ch.12:3, 9.496–ch.13:2.497–ch.19:20.498–1 Ti.4:1.499–2 Th.2:9.500–1 Jn.5:19.501–ch.19:19.502–2 Pe.3:10.503–ch.3:4, 18.504–ch.21:6.505–ch.11:13.506–Da.12:1.507–ch.14:8.508–Is.51:17, 23;Je.25:15, 16.509–ch.6:14.510–ch.11:19.511–ch.19:2;Na.3:4.512–Je.51:13.513–ch.18:3.514–ch.12:3.515–ch.13:1.516–gilded.517–Je.51:7.518–2 Th.2:7.519–or,fornications.520–ch.16:6.521–ver.1.522–ver.3.523–ch.11:7.524–ver.11.525–ch.13:3, 8.526–ch.13:1.527–Da.7:20;Zec.1:18–21.528–ch.19:19.529–Je.50:44.530–ch.19:16;De.10:17;1 Ti.6:15.531–Mi.5:8, 9.532–Ro.8:30, 37.533–Jn.15:16.534–ch.2:10.535–ver.1;Is.8:7.536–ch.13:7.537–Je.50:41, 42.538–Eze.16:37–44.539–ch.18:8, 18.540–Ac.4:27, 28.541–ch.10:7.542–ch.16:19.543–Eze.43:2.544–ch.14:8;Is.13:19; 21:9;Je.51:8.545–ch.17:2;Is.34:11, 14;Je.50:39; 51:37.546–Is.47:15.547–ver.11, 15.548–or,power.549–Is.48:20; 52:11;Je.50:8; 51:6, 45;2 Co.6:17.550–Je.51:9.551–ch.16:19.552–Ps.137:8;Je.50:15, 29.553–Is.47:7–11;Zep.2:15.554–ch.17:16.555–Ps.62:11;Je.50:34.556–Eze.26:16, 17.557–ver.17, 19.558–Eze.27:27–36.559–ch.17:4.560–or,sweet.561–or,bodies.562–Eze.27:13.563–Lu.16:19,&c.564–Is.23:14.565–Je.51:37.566–Jos.7:6; Job 2:12;Eze.27:30.567–Je.51:48.568–ch.19:2;De.32:43;Lu.18:7, 8.569–Je.51:64.570–Je.25:10.571–Je.7:34; 16:9; 33:11.572–Is.23:8.573–2 Ki.9:22;Na.3:4.574–Je.51:49.575–ch.11:15.576–ver.3, 4, 6.577–ch.7:10, 12.578–ch.16:7.579–ch.18:20.580–ch.18:9, 18;Is.34:10.581–Ps.135:1.582–Ps.97:1, 12.583–Mat.25:10.584–Is.52:1.585–ch.3:4;Is.61:10.586–or,bright.587–Ps.132:9.588–Lu.14:15.589–ch.3:20.590–ch.22:6.591–ch.22:8, 9.592–Ac.10:43;1 Pe.1:10, 11.593–ch.6:2.594–ch.3:14.595–Ps.45:3, 4;Is.11:4.596–ch.1:14; 2:18.597–ch.6:2;Ca.3:11;Is.62:3;Zec.9:16;He.2:9.598–ch.3:12.599–Jn.1:1.600–Mat.28:3.601–ch.1:16.602–Ps.2:9.603–Is.63:3.604–ch.17:14.605–Eze.39:17–20.606–ch.16:14, 16.607–ch.16:13, 14.608–ch.20:10;Da.7:11.609–ver.15;ch.1:16.610–ver.17, 18.611–ch.1:18; 9:1.612–ch.12:9.613–2 Pe.2:4; Jude 6.614–Da.6:17.615–Da.7:9, 22, 27;Lu.22:30.616–1 Co.6:2, 3.617–ch.6:9.618–ch.5:10.619–ch.2:11; 21:8.620–ch.1:6;Is.61:6.621–I have slightly abridged this passage, but have retained the sense.622–Eze.38:2; 39:1.623–ch.16:14.624–Is.8:8;Eze.38:9, 16.625–ch.19:20.626–2 Pe.3:10, 12.627–Da.7:10.628–ch.21:27;Da.12:1.629–Je.32:19;Mat.16:27.630–the grave.631–Ho.13:14;1 Co.15:26, 54.632–Mat.25:41.633–Is.65:17–19; 66:22;2 Pe.3:13.634–Is.52:1;He.11:10; 12:22.635–Is.54:5.636–Ps.45:9–14.637–2 Co.6:16.638–Zec.8:8.639–ch.7:17;Is.25:8.640–1 Co.15:26, 54.641–Is.35:10.642–ch.16:17.643–ch.1:8; 22:1.644–ch.22:17;Is.55:1;Jn.4:10, 14; 7:37.645–or,these.646–Lu.12:4–9.647–1 Jn.5:4, 10.648–1 Co.6:9, 10.649–1 Jn.3:15.650–He.13:4.651–Mal.3:5.652–1 Co.10:20, 21.653–ch.22:15;Pr.19:5, 9.654–ch.15:1, 6, 7.655–ch.19:7.656–Eze.xl.–xlviii.657–Is.60:1, 2.658–Eze.48:31–34.659–Ep.2:20.660–ch.11:1;Eze.40:3;Zec.2:1.661–Is.54:11.662–ch.22:5;Is.60:19, 20.663–Jn.1:4.664–Is.60:3–11; 66:10–12.665–Ps.72:11.666–Zec.14:7.667–Is.35:8; 52:1; 60:21; Joel 3:17;Mat.13:41;1 Co.6:9, 10;Ga.5:19–21;Ep.5:5;He.12:14.668–ch.13:8.669–Eze.47:1, 12.670–ch.21:21.671–ch.2:7.672–Zec.14:11.673–Eze.48:35.674–ch.7:15.675–Mat.5:8;Jn.12:26; 17. 24;1 Co.13:12;1 Jn.3:2.676–ch.3:12.677–ch.21:23, 25.678–Ps.36:9.679–Ro.5:17.680–Devil, inMS., but it must have been pronouncedScoticè, “deil.”681–Musing, inMS.682–ch.1:1.683–ver.10, 12, 20.684–Da.8:26.685–Pr.1:24–33;Ec.11:3;Mat.25:10;2 Ti.3:13.686–Pr.4:18;Mat.5:6.687–Zep.1:14.688–ch.20:12.689–Is.44:6.690–Lu.12:37, 38.691–ch.21:8, 27.692–Phi.3:2.693–ch.5:5.694–ch.21:2, 9.695–Is.2:5.696–ch.21:6.697–Pr.30:6.698–ch.3:5.699–or,from the tree.700–ver.7, 12.701–He.9:28;Is.25:9.702–2 Th.3:18.

Ingentem meminit parvo qui germine quercumÆquævumque videt consenuisse nemus.A neighbouring wood born with himself he seesAnd loves his old contemporary trees.—Cowley.

Ingentem meminit parvo qui germine quercumÆquævumque videt consenuisse nemus.A neighbouring wood born with himself he seesAnd loves his old contemporary trees.—Cowley.

Ingentem meminit parvo qui germine quercum

Æquævumque videt consenuisse nemus.

A neighbouring wood born with himself he sees

And loves his old contemporary trees.—Cowley.

1⁄4of a prophetic day or year (left out above) = 911⁄4days.

An hour =1⁄24of a prophetic day or year = 151⁄6days.

Total = years 396 + 106 days.”

Elliott,i.p.496.

Octonocenspueros genuit, totidemque puellas:Hunc merito potuit dicere Romapatrem.

Octonocenspueros genuit, totidemque puellas:Hunc merito potuit dicere Romapatrem.

Octonocenspueros genuit, totidemque puellas:

Hunc merito potuit dicere Romapatrem.

Back to IndexNext