Year.TaxesImposed.TaxesRepealed.Average Priceof Wheat.Winch. Qr.s.d.1816£320,058£17,547,56582018177,99136,495116018181,3369,56498018193,094,902705,8467801820119,6024,000760182142,642471,3097101822——2,139,101530182318,5964,050,250570182445,6051,704,724720182543,0003,639,5518401826188,0001,973,812730182721,4024,03850018281,96651,9987101829——126,4065541830696,0044,093,95564101831627,5861,598,536583183244,526747,2645261833——1,526,91447101834198,3942,091,516398183575165,8173531836——986,78657718373,991234513
GLASGOW: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT M ACLEHOSE AND CO. LTD.
FOOTNOTES:[1]Mr. Wilbraham was M.P. for Dover.[2]The depression in the rate of interest created by this monetary plethora is thus exhibited by Mr. Tooke:Dates.3 Per Cent.Consols.Premium onExchequer Bills.April 3, 1823,73½10 to 12July 1, 1823,80¾21 to 24Oct. 3, 1823,82½37 to 40Jan. 1, 1824,8651 to 53Apr. 2, 1824,94¼56 to 58Tooke on the State of the Currency, 1826, p. 41.[3]James Deacon Hume, Esq., then of the Customs, now (1830) of the Board of Trade.[4]The speech of Lord John Russell, when on March 1, 1831, he introduced the first Reform Bill, opened a debate which practically lasted until June 5, 1832. The Whig ministry knew that the fate of their party depended upon that of the Bill, and they came to realize that the fate of the dynasty itself might depend upon the same thing. The Opposition were no less desirous of victory, seeing in the Bill a measure which threatened the prosperity of the people and the very existence of the State. "The country was divided into two hostile camps, regarding each other with feelings of increased exasperation. On the one hand, the anti-reformers though, comparatively few, were immensely strong in position and prestige.... On the other hand, the reformers could count upon the support of the great mass of the people."[5]The First Reform Bill had passed two readings when the ministry, concluded after an adverse vote upon a motion, introduced by General Gascoyne, in opposition to their policy, that it was useless to continue the struggle in Parliament. Confident of the support of the electors, they resolved to appeal to the country. To do this a dissolution of Parliament was necessary, and against this the anti-reformers were firmly arrayed. The ministry appealed to the King. In the selection which follows, this appeal is vividly described, and the action of the King in dissolving Parliament is clearly portrayed.[6]Mr. O'Connell[7]Mr. Cobbett.[8]Character, Object, and Effects of Trades Unions, etc., 8vo, 1834. See also an able article in theGentleman's Magazinefor June, 1834.
[1]Mr. Wilbraham was M.P. for Dover.
[1]Mr. Wilbraham was M.P. for Dover.
[2]The depression in the rate of interest created by this monetary plethora is thus exhibited by Mr. Tooke:Dates.3 Per Cent.Consols.Premium onExchequer Bills.April 3, 1823,73½10 to 12July 1, 1823,80¾21 to 24Oct. 3, 1823,82½37 to 40Jan. 1, 1824,8651 to 53Apr. 2, 1824,94¼56 to 58Tooke on the State of the Currency, 1826, p. 41.
[2]The depression in the rate of interest created by this monetary plethora is thus exhibited by Mr. Tooke:
Dates.3 Per Cent.Consols.Premium onExchequer Bills.April 3, 1823,73½10 to 12July 1, 1823,80¾21 to 24Oct. 3, 1823,82½37 to 40Jan. 1, 1824,8651 to 53Apr. 2, 1824,94¼56 to 58
Tooke on the State of the Currency, 1826, p. 41.
[3]James Deacon Hume, Esq., then of the Customs, now (1830) of the Board of Trade.
[3]James Deacon Hume, Esq., then of the Customs, now (1830) of the Board of Trade.
[4]The speech of Lord John Russell, when on March 1, 1831, he introduced the first Reform Bill, opened a debate which practically lasted until June 5, 1832. The Whig ministry knew that the fate of their party depended upon that of the Bill, and they came to realize that the fate of the dynasty itself might depend upon the same thing. The Opposition were no less desirous of victory, seeing in the Bill a measure which threatened the prosperity of the people and the very existence of the State. "The country was divided into two hostile camps, regarding each other with feelings of increased exasperation. On the one hand, the anti-reformers though, comparatively few, were immensely strong in position and prestige.... On the other hand, the reformers could count upon the support of the great mass of the people."
[4]The speech of Lord John Russell, when on March 1, 1831, he introduced the first Reform Bill, opened a debate which practically lasted until June 5, 1832. The Whig ministry knew that the fate of their party depended upon that of the Bill, and they came to realize that the fate of the dynasty itself might depend upon the same thing. The Opposition were no less desirous of victory, seeing in the Bill a measure which threatened the prosperity of the people and the very existence of the State. "The country was divided into two hostile camps, regarding each other with feelings of increased exasperation. On the one hand, the anti-reformers though, comparatively few, were immensely strong in position and prestige.... On the other hand, the reformers could count upon the support of the great mass of the people."
[5]The First Reform Bill had passed two readings when the ministry, concluded after an adverse vote upon a motion, introduced by General Gascoyne, in opposition to their policy, that it was useless to continue the struggle in Parliament. Confident of the support of the electors, they resolved to appeal to the country. To do this a dissolution of Parliament was necessary, and against this the anti-reformers were firmly arrayed. The ministry appealed to the King. In the selection which follows, this appeal is vividly described, and the action of the King in dissolving Parliament is clearly portrayed.
[5]The First Reform Bill had passed two readings when the ministry, concluded after an adverse vote upon a motion, introduced by General Gascoyne, in opposition to their policy, that it was useless to continue the struggle in Parliament. Confident of the support of the electors, they resolved to appeal to the country. To do this a dissolution of Parliament was necessary, and against this the anti-reformers were firmly arrayed. The ministry appealed to the King. In the selection which follows, this appeal is vividly described, and the action of the King in dissolving Parliament is clearly portrayed.
[6]Mr. O'Connell
[6]Mr. O'Connell
[7]Mr. Cobbett.
[7]Mr. Cobbett.
[8]Character, Object, and Effects of Trades Unions, etc., 8vo, 1834. See also an able article in theGentleman's Magazinefor June, 1834.
[8]Character, Object, and Effects of Trades Unions, etc., 8vo, 1834. See also an able article in theGentleman's Magazinefor June, 1834.