III.THE JEW'S DAUGHTER,

[SecondFit, ver. 112.Agerstone.] The family ofHaggerstonofHaggerston, near Berwick, has been seated there for many centuries, and still remains.Thomas Haggerstonwas among the commissioners returned for Northumberland in 12 Hen. 6, 1433. (Fuller'sWorthies, p. 310.) The head of this family at present isSir Thomas Haggerston, Bart., ofHaggerstonabove-mentioned.

N.B. The name is speltAgerstone, as in the text, in Leland'sItinerary, vol. vii. p. 54.[318]

[Ver. 113.Hartly.]Hartleyis a village near the sea in the barony of Tinemouth, about 7 m. from North-Shields. It probably gave name to a family of note at that time.

[Ver. 114.Hearone.] This family, one of the most ancient, was long of great consideration in Northumberland.Haddeston, the Caput Baroniæ ofHeron, was their ancient residence. It descended25 Edw. I. to the heir generalEmiline Heron, afterwards BaronessDarcy.—Ford, &c., andBockenfield(in com. eodem) went at the same time toRoger Heron, the heir male; whose descendants were summoned to Parliament: SirWilliam Heronof Ford Castle being summoned 44 Edw. III.—Ford Castle hath descended by heirs general to the family of Delaval (mentioned in the next article).—Robert Heron, Esq., who died at Newark in 1753, (father of the Right Hon. SirRichard Heron, Bart.) was heir male of theHeronsof Bockenfield, a younger branch of this family.—SirThomas Heron Middleton, Bart., is heir male of theHeronsof Chip-Chase, another branch of the Herons of Ford Castle.

[Ver. 115.Lovele.]Joh. de Lavale, miles, was sheriff of Northumberland 34 Hen. VIII.Joh. de Lavele, mil.in the 1 Edw. VI. and afterwards. (Fuller, 313.) In Nicholson this name is speltDa Lovel, p. 304. This seems to be the ancient family ofDelaval, ofSeaton Delaval, in Northumberland, whose ancestor was one of the 25Baronsappointed to be guardians ofMagna Charta.[319]

[Ver. 117.Rugbè.] The ancient family ofRokeby, in Yorkshire, seems to be here intended. In Thoresby'sDucat. Leod., p. 253, fol., is a genealogy of this house, by which it appears that the head of the family, about the time when this ballad was written, was SirRalph Rokeby, Knt.,Ralphbeing a common name of theRokebys.[320]

[Ver. 119.Wetharrington.]Rog. de Widringtonwas sheriff of Northumberland in 36 of Edw. III. (Fuller, p. 311.)—Joh. deWidringtonin 11 of Hen. IV. and many others of the same name afterwards.—See also Nicholson, p. 331.—Of this family was the late Lord Witherington.

[Ver. 124.Mongonberry.] SirHugh Montgomerywas son ofJohnLordMontgomery, the lineal ancestor of the present Earl of Eglington.

[Ver. 125.Lwdale.] The ancient family of theLiddelswere originally from Scotland, where they were lords ofLiddel Castle, and of the Barony ofBuff. (Vid. Collins'sPeerage.) The head of this family is the present Lord Ravensworth, of Ravensworth Castle, in the county of Durham.[321]

[Ver. 101.Mentaye.] At the time of this battle the Earldom ofMenteithwas possessed byRobert Stewart, Earl of Fife, third son of K. Robert II., who, according to Buchanan, commanded the Scots that entered by Carlisle. But our minstrel had probably an eye to the family ofGraham, who had this earldom when the ballad was written. See Douglas'sPeerage of Scotland, 1764, fol.

[Ver. 103.Huntleye.] This shews this ballad was not composed before 1449; for in that year Alexander Lord of Gordon and Huntley, was created Earl ofHuntley, by K. James II.

[Ver. 105.Bowghan.] The Earl ofBuchanat that time wasAlexander Stewart, fourth son of K. Robert II.

[Ver. 107.Jhonstone—Maxwell.] These two families ofJohnstoneLord ofJohnston, andMaxwellLord ofMaxwell, were always very powerful on the borders. Of the former family wasJohnstonMarquis of Annandale: of the latter wasMaxwellEarl of Nithsdale. I cannot find that any chief of this family was named SirHugh; but SirHerbert Maxwellwas about this time much distinguished. (See Doug.) This might have been originally written SirH. Maxwell, and by transcribers converted into SirHugh. So above, in No. I. v. 90.Richardis contracted intoRic.

[Ver. 109.Swintone.]i. e.The Laird ofSwintone; a small village within the Scottish border, 3 miles from Norham. This family still subsists, and is very ancient.

[Ver. 111.Scotte.] The illustrious family ofScot, ancestors of the Duke of Buccleugh, always made a great figure on the borders. SirWalter Scotwas at the head of this family when the battle was fought; but his great-grandson, SirDavid Scot, was the hero of that house when the ballad was written.

[Ibid.Stewarde.] The person here designed was probably SirWalter Stewart, Lord of Dalswinton and Gairlies, who was eminent at that time. (See Doug.) From him is descended the present Earl of Galloway.

[Ver. 112.Agurstonne.] The seat of this family was sometimes subject to the kings of Scotland. ThusRichardus Haggerstoun,miles, is one of the Scottish knights who signed a treaty with the English in 1249, temp. Hen. III. (Nicholson, p. 2, note).—It was the fate of many parts of Northumberland often to change their masters, according as the Scottish or English arms prevailed.

[Ver. 129.Murrey.] The person here meant was probably SirCharles Murrayof Cockpoole, who flourished at that time, and was ancestor of theMurrayssometime Earls of Annandale. See Doug.Peerage.

[Ver. 139.Fitz-hughe.] Dugdale (in hisBaron.v. i. p. 403) informs us thatJohn, son of Henry LordFitzhugh, was killed at the battle of Otterbourne. This was a Northumberland family. Vid. Dugd. p. 403, col. 1, and Nicholson, pp. 33, 60.

[Ver. 141.Harbotle.]Harbottleis a village upon the river Coquet, about 10 m. west of Rothbury. The family ofHarbottlewas once considerable in Northumberland. (See Fuller, pp. 312, 313.) A daughter ofGuischard Harbottle, Esq., married SirThomas Percy, Knt., son ofHenrythe fifth,—and father ofThomasseventh, Earls of Northumberland.

FOOTNOTES:[212]Froissart speaks of both parties (consisting in all of more than 40,000 men) as entering England at the same time: but the greater part by way of Carlisle.[213]And, according to the ballad, that part of Northumberland called Bamboroughshire; a large tract of land so named from the town and castle of Bamborough; formerly the residence of the Northumbrian kings.[214]This circumstance is omitted in the ballad. Hotspur and Douglas were two young warriors much of the same age.[215]Froissart says the English exceeded the Scots in number three to one, but that these had the advantage of the ground, and were also fresh from sleep, while the English were greatly fatigued with their previous march.[216]By Henry L. Percy, according to this ballad, and our old English historians, as Stow, Speed, &c., but borne down by numbers, if we may believe Froissart.[217]Hotspur (after a very sharp conflict) was taken prisoner by John, Lord Montgomery, whose eldest son, Sir Hugh, was slain in the same action with an arrow, according to Crawford'sPeerage(and seems also to be alluded to in the foregoing ballad, p.31), but taken prisoner and exchanged for Hotspur, according to this ballad.[218]Froissart (according to the English translation) says he had his account from two squires of England, and from a knight and squire of Scotland, soon after the battle.[219]So in Langham'sLetter concerning Queen Elizabeth's entertainmentat Killingworth Castle, 1575, 12o. p. 61. "Heer was no ho in devout drinkyng."[220]i. e.They scorn to take the advantage, or to keep them lingering in long captivity.[221]The notice of this MS. I must acknowledge with many other obligations, owing to the friendship ofThomas Tyrwhitt, Esq., late Clerk of the House of Commons.[222]Ver. 2.winn their heaye. Harl. MS.This is the Northumberland phrase to this day: by which they always express "getting in their hay."[223][prepared.][224][earl.][225]Robert Stuart, second son of K.Robert II.[226]i. e."over Solway frith." This evidently refers to the other division of the Scottish army, which came in by way of Carlisle.Bowynd, orBounde him;i. e.hied him.[227]They: sc. the Earl of Douglas and his party. The several stations here mentioned are well-known places in Northumberland.Ottercap-hillis in the parish of Kirk Whelpington, in Tynedale-ward.Rodeliffe(or as it is more usually pronouncedRodeley)Craggeis a noted cliff nearRodeley, a small village in the parish of Hartburn, in Morpeth-ward. It lies south-east of Ottercap, and has, within these few years, been distinguished by a small tower erected by Sir Walter Blacket, Bart., which inArmstrong'smap of Northumberland is pompously calledRodely-castle.Green Leytonis another small village in the same parish of Hartburn, and is south-east of Rodeley. Both the original MSS. read here corruptly,HoppertopandLynton.[228][stirring.][229]V. 12. This line is corrupt in both the MSS., viz. "Many astyrande stage." Stags have been killed within the present century on some of the large wastes in Northumberland.[230][burnt.][231][pillaged.][232][wrong.][233][ready.][234][man.][235][field.][236][advise.][237][stoutly.][238]Marche-man,i. e.a scourer of the marches.[239][aloud.][240][art.][241]Ver. 39.Syneseems here to meansince.[242][regrets.][243][injury.][244][the one.][245]Otterbourn is near the old Watling Street road, in the parish of Elsdon. The Scots were encamped in a grassy plain near the riverRead. The place where the Scots and English fought, is still called Battle Riggs.[246][roe.][247]Ver. 53.Roe-buckswere to be found upon the wastes not far from Hexham in the reign of Geo. I.—Whitfield, Esq., of Whitfield, is said to have destroyed the last of them.[248][falcon and pheasant.][249][woods on high.][250]V. 56.hye, MSS.[251][come unto thee.][252][truth.][253][pitched.][254][booty.][255][then.][256][hovered.][257]Ver. 77.upon the best bent.MS.[258][spy.][259][aware.][260][spurred.][261][enthroned.][262][joy.][263][broad.][264][strong.][265][force.][266][peace.][267]The Earl of Menteith.[268][uncle.][269][van.][270][cautious.][271]The Lord Buchan.[272][ready.][273]Ver. 1, 13.Pearcy, all MSS.[274][promised or engaged.][275]V. 4. I will hold to what I have promised.[276]Ver. 10.hye, MSS.[277]He probably magnifies his strength to induce him to surrender.[278]V. 11.the one, MS.[279]All that follows, included in brackets, was not in the first edition.[280][let go.][281][royal.][282][rout.][283][deceive.][284][eye.][285][break my word.][286][rather.][287][flayed?][288][great maid.][289][reward.][290][commit himself to God by a sign.][291][say to you.][292]The ancient arms of Douglas are pretty accurately emblazoned in the former stanza, and if the readings were,The crowned harte, andAbove stode starres thre, it would be minutely exact at this day. As for the Percy family, one of their ancient badges of cognizances was awhyte lyonstatant, and thesilver crescentcontinues to be used by them to this day. They also givethreeluces argentfor one of their quarters.[293]i. e.the English.[294][swapped?i.e.smote.][295][Cologne steel.][296][helmets.][297][steam.][298][sword.][299]Being all in armour he could not know him.[300][guessed.][301][time.][302]Ver. 116. slayne. MSS.[303][man.][304][fight.][305][each one.][306][endure.][307]V. 124,i.e.He died that day.[308][dreadfully.][309]Our old minstrel repeats these names, as Homer and Virgil do those of their heroes:"——fortemque Gyam, fortemque Cloanthum," &c. &c.Both the MSS. read here, "Sir James," but see above, Pt. I., ver. 112.[310][truth.][311]Ver. 143. Covelle. MS. For the names in this page, see the remarks at the end of this ballad.[312]V. 153. one,i.e.on.[313][mates.][314][fetch.][315]sc. captive.[316]In the Cotton MS. is the following note on ver. 164, in an ancient hand:—"Syr Hewe Mongomery takyn prizonar, was delyvered for the restorynge of Perssy."[317]Ver. 165.Percyes.—Harl. MS.[318][Sir Walter Scott suggests that the person here alluded to was one of the Rutherfords, barons of Edgerstane or Edgerston, who at this time were retainers of the house of Douglas, but inChevyChaseSir John of Agerstone was on Percy's side.][319][This is a misreading, as the person intended was a Lumley.][320]Sir W. Scott supposes "Sir Raffe the ryche Rugbè" to be Sir Ralph Neville of Raby Castle, son of the first Earl of Westmoreland, and cousin-german to Hotspur. He is called Sir Ralph Raby in the modern version of the ballad.[321]More probably the Sir David Lambwell of the modern version.

[212]Froissart speaks of both parties (consisting in all of more than 40,000 men) as entering England at the same time: but the greater part by way of Carlisle.

[213]And, according to the ballad, that part of Northumberland called Bamboroughshire; a large tract of land so named from the town and castle of Bamborough; formerly the residence of the Northumbrian kings.

[214]This circumstance is omitted in the ballad. Hotspur and Douglas were two young warriors much of the same age.

[215]Froissart says the English exceeded the Scots in number three to one, but that these had the advantage of the ground, and were also fresh from sleep, while the English were greatly fatigued with their previous march.

[216]By Henry L. Percy, according to this ballad, and our old English historians, as Stow, Speed, &c., but borne down by numbers, if we may believe Froissart.

[217]Hotspur (after a very sharp conflict) was taken prisoner by John, Lord Montgomery, whose eldest son, Sir Hugh, was slain in the same action with an arrow, according to Crawford'sPeerage(and seems also to be alluded to in the foregoing ballad, p.31), but taken prisoner and exchanged for Hotspur, according to this ballad.

[218]Froissart (according to the English translation) says he had his account from two squires of England, and from a knight and squire of Scotland, soon after the battle.

[219]So in Langham'sLetter concerning Queen Elizabeth's entertainmentat Killingworth Castle, 1575, 12o. p. 61. "Heer was no ho in devout drinkyng."

[220]i. e.They scorn to take the advantage, or to keep them lingering in long captivity.

[221]The notice of this MS. I must acknowledge with many other obligations, owing to the friendship ofThomas Tyrwhitt, Esq., late Clerk of the House of Commons.

[222]Ver. 2.winn their heaye. Harl. MS.This is the Northumberland phrase to this day: by which they always express "getting in their hay."

[223][prepared.]

[224][earl.]

[225]Robert Stuart, second son of K.Robert II.

[226]i. e."over Solway frith." This evidently refers to the other division of the Scottish army, which came in by way of Carlisle.Bowynd, orBounde him;i. e.hied him.

[227]They: sc. the Earl of Douglas and his party. The several stations here mentioned are well-known places in Northumberland.Ottercap-hillis in the parish of Kirk Whelpington, in Tynedale-ward.Rodeliffe(or as it is more usually pronouncedRodeley)Craggeis a noted cliff nearRodeley, a small village in the parish of Hartburn, in Morpeth-ward. It lies south-east of Ottercap, and has, within these few years, been distinguished by a small tower erected by Sir Walter Blacket, Bart., which inArmstrong'smap of Northumberland is pompously calledRodely-castle.Green Leytonis another small village in the same parish of Hartburn, and is south-east of Rodeley. Both the original MSS. read here corruptly,HoppertopandLynton.

[228][stirring.]

[229]V. 12. This line is corrupt in both the MSS., viz. "Many astyrande stage." Stags have been killed within the present century on some of the large wastes in Northumberland.

[230][burnt.]

[231][pillaged.]

[232][wrong.]

[233][ready.]

[234][man.]

[235][field.]

[236][advise.]

[237][stoutly.]

[238]Marche-man,i. e.a scourer of the marches.

[239][aloud.]

[240][art.]

[241]Ver. 39.Syneseems here to meansince.

[242][regrets.]

[243][injury.]

[244][the one.]

[245]Otterbourn is near the old Watling Street road, in the parish of Elsdon. The Scots were encamped in a grassy plain near the riverRead. The place where the Scots and English fought, is still called Battle Riggs.

[246][roe.]

[247]Ver. 53.Roe-buckswere to be found upon the wastes not far from Hexham in the reign of Geo. I.—Whitfield, Esq., of Whitfield, is said to have destroyed the last of them.

[248][falcon and pheasant.]

[249][woods on high.]

[250]V. 56.hye, MSS.

[251][come unto thee.]

[252][truth.]

[253][pitched.]

[254][booty.]

[255][then.]

[256][hovered.]

[257]Ver. 77.upon the best bent.MS.

[258][spy.]

[259][aware.]

[260][spurred.]

[261][enthroned.]

[262][joy.]

[263][broad.]

[264][strong.]

[265][force.]

[266][peace.]

[267]The Earl of Menteith.

[268][uncle.]

[269][van.]

[270][cautious.]

[271]The Lord Buchan.

[272][ready.]

[273]Ver. 1, 13.Pearcy, all MSS.

[274][promised or engaged.]

[275]V. 4. I will hold to what I have promised.

[276]Ver. 10.hye, MSS.

[277]He probably magnifies his strength to induce him to surrender.

[278]V. 11.the one, MS.

[279]All that follows, included in brackets, was not in the first edition.

[280][let go.]

[281][royal.]

[282][rout.]

[283][deceive.]

[284][eye.]

[285][break my word.]

[286][rather.]

[287][flayed?]

[288][great maid.]

[289][reward.]

[290][commit himself to God by a sign.]

[291][say to you.]

[292]The ancient arms of Douglas are pretty accurately emblazoned in the former stanza, and if the readings were,The crowned harte, andAbove stode starres thre, it would be minutely exact at this day. As for the Percy family, one of their ancient badges of cognizances was awhyte lyonstatant, and thesilver crescentcontinues to be used by them to this day. They also givethreeluces argentfor one of their quarters.

[293]i. e.the English.

[294][swapped?i.e.smote.]

[295][Cologne steel.]

[296][helmets.]

[297][steam.]

[298][sword.]

[299]Being all in armour he could not know him.

[300][guessed.]

[301][time.]

[302]Ver. 116. slayne. MSS.

[303][man.]

[304][fight.]

[305][each one.]

[306][endure.]

[307]V. 124,i.e.He died that day.

[308][dreadfully.]

[309]Our old minstrel repeats these names, as Homer and Virgil do those of their heroes:"——fortemque Gyam, fortemque Cloanthum," &c. &c.Both the MSS. read here, "Sir James," but see above, Pt. I., ver. 112.

[309]Our old minstrel repeats these names, as Homer and Virgil do those of their heroes:

"——fortemque Gyam, fortemque Cloanthum," &c. &c.

Both the MSS. read here, "Sir James," but see above, Pt. I., ver. 112.

[310][truth.]

[311]Ver. 143. Covelle. MS. For the names in this page, see the remarks at the end of this ballad.

[312]V. 153. one,i.e.on.

[313][mates.]

[314][fetch.]

[315]sc. captive.

[316]In the Cotton MS. is the following note on ver. 164, in an ancient hand:—"Syr Hewe Mongomery takyn prizonar, was delyvered for the restorynge of Perssy."

[316]In the Cotton MS. is the following note on ver. 164, in an ancient hand:—

"Syr Hewe Mongomery takyn prizonar, was delyvered for the restorynge of Perssy."

[317]Ver. 165.Percyes.—Harl. MS.

[318][Sir Walter Scott suggests that the person here alluded to was one of the Rutherfords, barons of Edgerstane or Edgerston, who at this time were retainers of the house of Douglas, but inChevyChaseSir John of Agerstone was on Percy's side.]

[319][This is a misreading, as the person intended was a Lumley.]

[320]Sir W. Scott supposes "Sir Raffe the ryche Rugbè" to be Sir Ralph Neville of Raby Castle, son of the first Earl of Westmoreland, and cousin-german to Hotspur. He is called Sir Ralph Raby in the modern version of the ballad.

[321]More probably the Sir David Lambwell of the modern version.

A Scottish Ballad,

Isfounded upon the supposed practice of the Jews in crucifying or otherwise murdering Christian children, out of hatred to the religion of their parents: a practice which has been always alledged in excuse for the cruelties exercised upon that wretched people, but which probably never happened in a single instance. For, if we consider, on the one hand, the ignorance and superstition of the times when such stories took their rise, the virulent prejudices of the monks who record them, and the eagerness with which they would be catched up by the barbarous populace as a pretence for plunder; on the other hand, the great danger incurred by the perpetrators, and the inadequate motives they could have to excite them to a crime of so much horror; we may reasonably conclude the whole charge to be groundless and malicious.

The following ballad is probably built upon some Italian legend, and bears a great resemblance to the Prioresse's Tale in Chaucer: the poet seems also to have had an eye to the known story ofHugh of Lincoln, a child said to have been there murdered by the Jews in the reign of Henry III. The conclusion of this ballad appears to be wanting: what it probably contained may be seenin Chaucer. As forMirry-land Toun, it is probably a corruption ofMilan(called by the DutchMeylandt)Town: thePais evidently the riverPo; although the Adige, not the Po, runs through Milan.

Printed from a MS. copy sent from Scotland.

[This ballad, which is also known under the title ofSir Hugh ofLincoln, was at one time so widely popular that it is preserved in six different versions, besides fragments, and has originated a literature of its own. Mons. Francisque Michel discovered a Norman-French version in the Royal Library at Paris, which is supposed to date back to the period when the murder of Sir Hugh was to have been committed. This was first published in the year 1834 under the title, "Hugues de Lincoln: Recueil de Ballades Anglo-Normande et Ecossoises relatives au meurtre de cet enfant commis par les Juifs enMCCLV." The Rev. Dr. A. Hume communicated a very full paper on the subject of the tradition to the Literary and Philosophical Society of Liverpool, on November 13, 1848, which is published in the Proceedings (No. 5), and Mr. J. O. Halliwell printed, in 1849, a small volume containing "Ballads and Poems respecting Hugh of Lincoln." In theAthenæumfor Dec. 15, 1849, there is a condemnatory review of Dr. Hume's work, to which the reviewer has added some valuable information of his own. Percy's remark thatMirry-land townis a corruption of Milan town, andPaof the river Po, seems far-fetched, as there is no reason for supposing that the ballad was in any way connected with Italy. Jamieson's version readsMerry Lincoln, and in Motherwell's the scene is changed to Maitland town. In some parts of England the ballad has degenerated into a sort of nursery rhyme, the Northamptonshire version reading "Merry Scotland," and the Shropshire one, "Merry-cock land." Mr. J. H. Dixon suggestsmere-land town, from the mere or fen lakes, and reads wa' for Pa'. (Notes and Queries, 3rd Series, vol. ix. p. 30, note.)Miss Agnes Strickland communicated the following lines obtained from oral tradition at Godalming, in Surrey, to Mr. Halliwell, who printed them in his tract:—"He toss'd the ball so high, so high,He toss'd the ball so low;He toss'd the ball in the Jew's garden,And the Jews were all below."Oh! then out came the Jew's daughter,She was dressèd all in green:'Come hither, come hither, my sweet pretty fellow,And fetch your ball again.'"The tradition upon which this ballad is founded—that the Jews use human blood in their preparation for the Passover, and are in the habit of kidnapping and butchering Christian children for the purpose—is very widely spread and of great antiquity. Eisenmenger[322]refers to a case which occurred at Inmestar, in Syria, so early as the year 419, but the earliest case recorded as having occurred in Europe is that of William of Norwich, in 1137. The following is a translation from a passage in thePeterboroughChronicle(which ends with the death of Stephen and the accession of Henry the Second), relating to this remarkable superstition:—"Now we will say something of what happened in King Stephen's time. In his time the Jews of Norwich bought a Christian child before Easter, and tortured him with all the same torturing that our Lord was tortured. And on Good Friday (lang fridæi) they hanged him on a cross, for our Lord's love; and afterwards buried him. They thought (wenden) that it should be concealed, but our Lord showed that he was a holy martyr (m̃r), and the monks took him and buried him solemnly in the monastery (minst). And he maketh through our Lord wonderful and manifold miracles. And he was called Saint William." Mr. Earle, in his note to this passage,[323]says that "S. William seems to have retained his celebrity down to the time of the Reformation, at least in Norfolk. In Loddon church, which is advanced perpendicular of about 1500, there is a painting of his crucifixion on a panel of the rood-screen, still in fair preservation."St. William's fame, however, was eclipsed in other parts of England by that of Sir Hugh of Lincoln, whose death was celebrated by historians and poets. Henry III. being often in want of money, was glad to take any opportunity of extorting it from the unfortunate Jews, and in 1255 his exchequer particularly required replenishing on account of the expected arrival in England of his son Edward's newly married wife, Eleanor of Castile. In this year a young boy was murdered, and, opportunely for the king, the crime was charged to the Jews. It was asserted that the child had been stolen, fattened on bread and milk for ten days, and crucified with all the cruelties and insults of Christ's passion, in the presence of all the Jews in England, who had been summoned to Lincoln for the purpose. The supposed criminals were brought to justice, and the king's commission for the trial, and the warrant to sell the goods of the several Jews who were found guilty, are still preserved. The Jew into whose house the child had gone to play, tempted by the promise of his life, made a full confession, and threw the guilt upon his brethren. Ninety-one Jews of Lincoln were sent to London as accomplices, and thrown into dungeons. Eighteen of the richest were hanged on a gallows, and twenty more imprisoned in the Tower of London. The king was enriched by the spoils, and the clergy of Lincoln did not lose their opportunity, for the minster was made famous by the possession of the martyr's tomb. Dean Milman, in relating these circumstances, says: "Great part of the story refutes itself, but I have already admitted the possibility that among the ignorant and fanatic Jews there might be some who, exasperated by the constant repetition of the charge, might brood over it so long, as at length to be tempted to its perpetration."[324]Any such explanation as this, however, does not seem necessary, for the wide-spread existence of the superstition goes far to prove the entire falsehood at least of the later cases, and the story of Sir Hugh was but a revival of that of St. William. It is worth mentioning, in passing, that this calumny was in fact a recoil upon the Jews themselves of a weapon they had used against the Christians. As early as the third century they affirmed that Christians in celebrating their mysteries used to kill a child and eat its flesh. Pagans probably learnt the calumny from the Jews, and also charged the Christians with eating children.The whole proceedings in the case of Sir Hugh are chronicled by Matthew Paris, who was in high favour with Henry III., and from his pages the account is transferred to the Chronicles of Grafton, Fabyan, and Holinshed. Chaucer most probably consulted the same source when he included the story in hisCanterburyTales, although he shifts the scene to Asia, and makes his Prioress say, when ending her tale with a reference to Sir Hugh:—"O younge Hughe of Lyncoln; slayn alsoWith cursed Jewes (as it is notable,For it nysbut a litel while ago)."Tyrwhitt, in his edition of Chaucer, notes that he found in the first four months of theActa Sanctorumof Bollandus the names of five children canonized as having been murdered by the Jews, and he supposes that the remaining eight months would furnish at least as many more. Tyrwhitt accepts Percy's interpretation of Mirry-land as a corruption of the name of Milan, and under this erroneous impression he suggests that the real occasion of the ballad may have been the murder of the boy Simon, at Trent, in 1475.[325]The superstition upon which all these stories are founded is said still to prevail among the ignorant members of the Greek Church, and it was revived at Damascus in 1840 in consequence of the disappearance of a priest named Thomaso. Two or three Jews were put to death before a proper judicial examination could be made, and the popular fury was so excited that severe persecution extended through a large part of the Turkish empire. Sir Moses Montefiore visited the various localities with the object of obtaining redress for his people, and he was successful. On November 6, 1840, a firman for the protection of the Jews was given at Constantinople, which contained the following passage:—"An ancient prejudice prevailed against the Jews. The ignorant believed that the Jews were accustomed to sacrifice a human being, to make use of his blood at the Passover. In consequence of this opinion the Jews of Damascus and Rhodes, who are subjects of our empire, have been persecuted by other nations.... But a short time has elapsed since some Jews dwelling in the isle of Rhodes were brought from thence to Constantinople, where they had been tried and judged according to the new regulations, and their innocence of the accusations made against them fully proved." The calumny, however, was again raised in October, 1847, and the Jews were in imminent peril when the missing boy, who had been staying at Baalbec, reappeared in good health.Within the last few years the Greek Patriarch at Constantinople has issued a pastoral letter, in which he points out the wickedness of the Christian persecution of the Jews. He says: "Superstition is a detestable thing. Almost all the Christian nations of the East have taken up the extravagant idea that the Israelites enjoy shedding Christian blood, either to obtain thereby a blessing from heaven, or to gratify their national rancour against Christ. Hence conflicts and disturbances break out, by which the social harmony between the dwellers in the same land, yea, the same fatherland, is disturbed. Thus a report was lately spread of the abduction of little Christian children in order to give a pretext for suspicion. We on our side abhor such lying fancies; we regard them as the superstitions of men of weak faith and narrow minds; and we disavow them officially."The superstition, however, still lives on, and according to theLevant Herald(1874), the Mahometans are beginning to fall into the delusion that the sacrificial knife is applied by the Jews to young Turks as well as to young Christians.]

Miss Agnes Strickland communicated the following lines obtained from oral tradition at Godalming, in Surrey, to Mr. Halliwell, who printed them in his tract:—

"He toss'd the ball so high, so high,He toss'd the ball so low;He toss'd the ball in the Jew's garden,And the Jews were all below."Oh! then out came the Jew's daughter,She was dressèd all in green:'Come hither, come hither, my sweet pretty fellow,And fetch your ball again.'"

"He toss'd the ball so high, so high,He toss'd the ball so low;He toss'd the ball in the Jew's garden,And the Jews were all below.

"Oh! then out came the Jew's daughter,She was dressèd all in green:'Come hither, come hither, my sweet pretty fellow,And fetch your ball again.'"

The tradition upon which this ballad is founded—that the Jews use human blood in their preparation for the Passover, and are in the habit of kidnapping and butchering Christian children for the purpose—is very widely spread and of great antiquity. Eisenmenger[322]refers to a case which occurred at Inmestar, in Syria, so early as the year 419, but the earliest case recorded as having occurred in Europe is that of William of Norwich, in 1137. The following is a translation from a passage in thePeterboroughChronicle(which ends with the death of Stephen and the accession of Henry the Second), relating to this remarkable superstition:—"Now we will say something of what happened in King Stephen's time. In his time the Jews of Norwich bought a Christian child before Easter, and tortured him with all the same torturing that our Lord was tortured. And on Good Friday (lang fridæi) they hanged him on a cross, for our Lord's love; and afterwards buried him. They thought (wenden) that it should be concealed, but our Lord showed that he was a holy martyr (m̃r), and the monks took him and buried him solemnly in the monastery (minst). And he maketh through our Lord wonderful and manifold miracles. And he was called Saint William." Mr. Earle, in his note to this passage,[323]says that "S. William seems to have retained his celebrity down to the time of the Reformation, at least in Norfolk. In Loddon church, which is advanced perpendicular of about 1500, there is a painting of his crucifixion on a panel of the rood-screen, still in fair preservation."

St. William's fame, however, was eclipsed in other parts of England by that of Sir Hugh of Lincoln, whose death was celebrated by historians and poets. Henry III. being often in want of money, was glad to take any opportunity of extorting it from the unfortunate Jews, and in 1255 his exchequer particularly required replenishing on account of the expected arrival in England of his son Edward's newly married wife, Eleanor of Castile. In this year a young boy was murdered, and, opportunely for the king, the crime was charged to the Jews. It was asserted that the child had been stolen, fattened on bread and milk for ten days, and crucified with all the cruelties and insults of Christ's passion, in the presence of all the Jews in England, who had been summoned to Lincoln for the purpose. The supposed criminals were brought to justice, and the king's commission for the trial, and the warrant to sell the goods of the several Jews who were found guilty, are still preserved. The Jew into whose house the child had gone to play, tempted by the promise of his life, made a full confession, and threw the guilt upon his brethren. Ninety-one Jews of Lincoln were sent to London as accomplices, and thrown into dungeons. Eighteen of the richest were hanged on a gallows, and twenty more imprisoned in the Tower of London. The king was enriched by the spoils, and the clergy of Lincoln did not lose their opportunity, for the minster was made famous by the possession of the martyr's tomb. Dean Milman, in relating these circumstances, says: "Great part of the story refutes itself, but I have already admitted the possibility that among the ignorant and fanatic Jews there might be some who, exasperated by the constant repetition of the charge, might brood over it so long, as at length to be tempted to its perpetration."[324]Any such explanation as this, however, does not seem necessary, for the wide-spread existence of the superstition goes far to prove the entire falsehood at least of the later cases, and the story of Sir Hugh was but a revival of that of St. William. It is worth mentioning, in passing, that this calumny was in fact a recoil upon the Jews themselves of a weapon they had used against the Christians. As early as the third century they affirmed that Christians in celebrating their mysteries used to kill a child and eat its flesh. Pagans probably learnt the calumny from the Jews, and also charged the Christians with eating children.

The whole proceedings in the case of Sir Hugh are chronicled by Matthew Paris, who was in high favour with Henry III., and from his pages the account is transferred to the Chronicles of Grafton, Fabyan, and Holinshed. Chaucer most probably consulted the same source when he included the story in hisCanterburyTales, although he shifts the scene to Asia, and makes his Prioress say, when ending her tale with a reference to Sir Hugh:—

"O younge Hughe of Lyncoln; slayn alsoWith cursed Jewes (as it is notable,For it nysbut a litel while ago)."

Tyrwhitt, in his edition of Chaucer, notes that he found in the first four months of theActa Sanctorumof Bollandus the names of five children canonized as having been murdered by the Jews, and he supposes that the remaining eight months would furnish at least as many more. Tyrwhitt accepts Percy's interpretation of Mirry-land as a corruption of the name of Milan, and under this erroneous impression he suggests that the real occasion of the ballad may have been the murder of the boy Simon, at Trent, in 1475.[325]

The superstition upon which all these stories are founded is said still to prevail among the ignorant members of the Greek Church, and it was revived at Damascus in 1840 in consequence of the disappearance of a priest named Thomaso. Two or three Jews were put to death before a proper judicial examination could be made, and the popular fury was so excited that severe persecution extended through a large part of the Turkish empire. Sir Moses Montefiore visited the various localities with the object of obtaining redress for his people, and he was successful. On November 6, 1840, a firman for the protection of the Jews was given at Constantinople, which contained the following passage:—"An ancient prejudice prevailed against the Jews. The ignorant believed that the Jews were accustomed to sacrifice a human being, to make use of his blood at the Passover. In consequence of this opinion the Jews of Damascus and Rhodes, who are subjects of our empire, have been persecuted by other nations.... But a short time has elapsed since some Jews dwelling in the isle of Rhodes were brought from thence to Constantinople, where they had been tried and judged according to the new regulations, and their innocence of the accusations made against them fully proved." The calumny, however, was again raised in October, 1847, and the Jews were in imminent peril when the missing boy, who had been staying at Baalbec, reappeared in good health.

Within the last few years the Greek Patriarch at Constantinople has issued a pastoral letter, in which he points out the wickedness of the Christian persecution of the Jews. He says: "Superstition is a detestable thing. Almost all the Christian nations of the East have taken up the extravagant idea that the Israelites enjoy shedding Christian blood, either to obtain thereby a blessing from heaven, or to gratify their national rancour against Christ. Hence conflicts and disturbances break out, by which the social harmony between the dwellers in the same land, yea, the same fatherland, is disturbed. Thus a report was lately spread of the abduction of little Christian children in order to give a pretext for suspicion. We on our side abhor such lying fancies; we regard them as the superstitions of men of weak faith and narrow minds; and we disavow them officially."

The superstition, however, still lives on, and according to theLevant Herald(1874), the Mahometans are beginning to fall into the delusion that the sacrificial knife is applied by the Jews to young Turks as well as to young Christians.]

Back to Index Next