Our Rector

But the career of that preacher was ended—in Bayview.

Wehad two, if not three, celebrities in our village.  The Rector is dead; the Clerk is dead; the Professor still lives.  But, independently of this claim to our respect, let us give precedence to the Church.

Less than fifty years ago the services in a parish not ten miles from one of our well-known watering places were done—or left undone—by surely the queerest cleric of his time.

A grand old man he was in person—tall, and venerable as Bede himself, with the most benevolent of faces and the most silver of silver hair.  Fit to be an archbishop, so far as appearances went, but most unfit to have the charge of the hundred souls—there were no more of them—committed to his trust.

To these he ministered, or (as I have said) failed to minister, on Sunday mornings; for often as not the services, stipulated for at the price of £75 per annum, were left unperformed on the shallowest of pretexts.  It might bethe weather; it might be that he was indisposed; often, I fear, it was from sheer disinclination.

To the hamlet that clustered close round the church it was a matter of comparative indifference.  They never believed by anticipation in the service till the bell was actually sounding; and his henchman (clerk, sexton, choirmaster and gravedigger in one) had strict orders to withhold this summons till the Rector himself was actually in view.  But to our party, who lived two miles away, the question of service or no service was a serious one.  It meant hesitation in starting, and reluctance to risk the chance—provocation, too, even to my long-suffering father, when he found the church door barred, and a south-wester brewing, in the teeth of which we had to struggle home over a barren down, unsupported by the nutriment, mental and moral, on which we had calculated.  But the service, when it did take place, was a queerer experience by far than the service foregone.  The orchestra would have been the despair of Nebuchadnezzar.  It consisted of a single flageolet, blown by the wheezy old sexton—one Joseph Edwards by name.  We did noteven boast of a serpent—instrument immortalised by Mr. Hardy for its volume of tone in supplementing deficiencies.  Now the flageolet is a pet aversion of mine, and I can forgive Nebuchadnezzar many of his iniquities for having (so far as we know) excluded it from his band.  Indeed, musicians themselves would seem to be ashamed of it, for they have re-christened it, I am told, by a humbler name.  But I was careful not to betray my feelings to my friend Joseph, and listened patiently while he enlarged on the capabilities and melodiousness of his pet instrument.  “Not but what I’m getting a bit wheezy (he’d often say to me), and can’t make the flourishes as onst I could.  But ’tis may be better as it is.  They quieter tunes are belike more godly.  Anyhow the choir—poor souls—got right puzzled among my turns and quavers, coming in here, there and no how at the finish.”

But, praise it as he might, the flageolet is the worst instrument possible to constitute an orchestra; especially when played as Joseph played it.  It gave out a series of squeaks and counter-squeaks—punctuated and accentuated by his wheezes rather thanby the requirements of the tune.  Indeed, a boy learning the bugle, or a Punch and Judy panpipe, would have discoursed more decorous music.  To me the panpipe and the flageolet seem nearly akin; only the flageolet is the more powerful instrument of the two, and Punch is more exacting than we were in the choice of an executant.

Once, as a special favour, I was invited by Joseph to attend a choir practice.  It was before his hand or, I should say, his breath had lost its cunning; and it took place on this wise.  An hour before service (which on this occasion was actually realised) Joseph took his stand in the reading desk, flageolet in hand, while a group of apple-cheeked cottagers—fishermen mainly, and plough-boys—grouped themselves in my father’s pew below.  In one point at any rate Joseph had anticipated the ritual of later days; he repudiated all women from his choir.  “’Taint no place for ’em,” he’d say; “I wonder what ’postle Paul ’d think, if he could ha’ heard they two women at S. Matthew’s screechin’ out ‘O ’twas a joyful sound to hear’—and none of us, let alone the choir, privileged to put in a joyful sound along wi ’em.  If womenbaint allowed to preach in Church, stands to reason that they baint allowed to sing.”

“Now boys, turn to ‘Aurelia,’ and go for to remember that we sing the whole on’t right through this time.  Last time as ever we did it some on you took to skipping and one sang one verse and t’other the next, whereby I had to blow myself nigh faint to hide your discordance.  And mind ye too, sing ’en slow, not as if you wanted to get shot on’t.”

All went well at the first rehearsal, for Joseph played the air distinctly and without disturbing flourishes—only with an intolerable drawl, mindful in all probability of “passon’s” injunctions; of which more anon.

“Well sung,” says he; “you be a good choir when you be so minded; and well instructed, too, though I says it as didn’t ought to.  Now then, we’ll see what ye can do when I puts in the flourishes.”

This was a change for the worse, and what had been a melancholy dirge became a haphazard scramble for notes, each boy seizing on the one that he could detect among the enveloping flourishes, regardless whether it was the same note that had found favourwith his neighbour.  In the end the hymn became a sacrilegious fugue, devoid of time, harmony or sequence.  Yet Joseph was never disquieted at the result.  On the contrary, he regarded it as a tribute to his skill, addressing his choir at the finish as a general might address his discomfited troops: “You’ve done your best, and none of us can’t do no more.  Better luck at church-time, and this I do say, that ’tis few players can overlay a melody as I can wi’ flourishes and expect them as sings it to pick out the tune.”

But to return to our Rector.  The fun began (I write, remember, as a boy of ten) with the First Lesson.  When the time for it approached, great preparations were seen to be in progress.  Our benevolent Archbishop retired into the recesses of the reading desk (a high, square pew, scarcely to be differentiated from our own) and disposed his lunch in orderly array upon the sill overhanging my father’s head.  And, to give time for its consumption, a boy was summoned from the congregation—usually it was his own son, a curly-pated lad of thirteen—to discourse the Lesson.  Manfully he grappled with the difficulties and hard names of the Old Testament—sticking and halting at nothing, and making a record of false quantities and mispronunciations that I have never heard beaten during a twenty years’ experience of the average undergraduate.  Meanwhile his father lunched peacefully, careless what havoc he made with the Kings of Israel and Judah.  But woe betide the boy if ever he tried to skip a name.  A guttural rebuke issued from the depths of the reading desk: “None of that, Jack; go back, my lad, and try it again.”

But his greatest delight of all was to hear Jack struggling with the genealogy in St. Luke.  A series of chuckles issued from the corner where the old man lay ensconced, that gathered in volume with every fresh fall; and when the boy, hot and discomfited, retired from the fray, there was a pause in the proceedings till the old man had recovered himself sufficiently to resume his functions.  His luncheon meanwhile had been progressing steadily, not without the gurgling sound of something comforting to facilitate digestion.  It puzzled me for years to discover theraison d’ êtreof this extraordinary meal, knowing as I did that an hour later he would be dining with one of his cottagers, after careful preliminaryenquiry as to which house could offer the most attractive fare.  Only quite lately, long after the idea of luncheon had been stereotyped upon my brain, I found out that the so-called luncheon was, after all, no luncheon at all, but only a retarded breakfast.  Our Rector being a late riser, and having a five-mile walk before him, could find no opportunity of taking it in comfort till he had reached the haven of the parish reading desk.

A cigar was the indispensable accompaniment of the second Lesson, during which period its fumes could be seen ascending like “curling incense” to the blackened rafters of the roof.  Indeed, the only thing that ever really shattered my father’s equanimity was the sight of its reeking end, projected over his head from the sill of the reading desk, where the Rector had reluctantly placed it while he applied himself to the requirements of the “Benedictus.”

When the flageolet sounded the key note of the first hymn, the Rector regarded it as the signal of a temporary relaxation.  He was for a time off duty, and the cigar was again in requisition.  But in fine and balmyweather, he found the atmosphere of the church too close for its enjoyment.  It “gathered sweetness from the open air.”  So, attired in surplice, stole and bands, our Rector strolled out into the churchyard—giving us pleasant little vista-views of his enjoyment as he passed and re-passed the windows of the aisles.  That it might be enjoyed in perfection and unto the end, the hymns selected were inordinately long.  But, if fate was against him, and the wind light, and the cigar drew slowly, he had no false shame in appearing on the chancel steps to announce with all the dignity of a formal notice that the last two verses of the hymn would be repeated.  After which he disappeared into the churchyard again.

The sermon was to me, as a boy, full of the most delightful interest.  It had an infinity of anticipation.  No one knew what was coming—least of all the Rector himself.  We felt stimulated by the chance of any and every possibility.  A clergyman of the strictest sect of the Evangelicals, he always preached in a surplice.  (It was in the days, remember, when the Geneva gown was the badge of that school, and the sign of a high church cleric was barely appearing above the horizon).

But I sadly fear that our Rector was influenced by no question of principle or non-principle; I cannot, I think, be wronging him if I infer that his preference for the surplice was due to sheer indifference or indolence.

Then came the always exciting task of moving the immense Bible from the reading desk to the pulpit.  He regarded it, I think, almost in the light of a fetish, and certainly, so long as I knew him, would never have attempted a sermon with any smaller and less trustworthy guide.  He balanced the enormous volume in his right hand, and, with his left hand on the rails, steadied himself as he made the painful and perilous ascent.  The hope, I fear, of us boys was that the book would one day slip from his hand and imperil the head of the clerk beneath, who was now no longer choirmaster, but, like a Roman flute player, had crossed over to his proper seat and resumed his duties beneath the pulpit.  But the hope was never realised, and I have felt ever since that my life has lacked something in consequence.

The choice of his text was the longest part of his sermon.  The Bible was opened haphazard, as though he intended to executea sort ofsors Vergiliana.  But so casual a method was quite unsuited to the dignity of our Rector.  The pages were turned and re-turned; whole chapters were read and carefully studied, and, after a quarter of an hour of this preliminary investigation, a text was given out, that for glaring irrelevance and disconnection with everything else could never have been surpassed if he had taken it at sight.  A name out of a genealogy—the Christian name Mary—Tophet—the daubed wall—pillows for all armholes—are among the subjects that I distinctly remember were selected for our edification.  But of the treatment alas! I remember nothing—nothing then, and certainly nothing now, when I would give £50 to trace the exact process of his reasoning.

The last sermon I ever heard him deliver was on the text, “And there shall be no more sea”—an unwise and disquieting subject for a congregation, most of whom came of a race of fishermen, and gained their living from the element which he so confidently annihilated.

“If there baint no sea, then ’tis no place for I,” I heard a man say to his neighbour ashe passed out of church; “and sakes alive, where be ’en going to get their fish from?”

Such was our Rector.  Not reverent or discreet, you will say, in his capacity of priest.  No, but a kindly, genial old man; devoted to his parishioners, if not to his duties; clever too, and companionable in society, and inexhaustible to the boys of the parish in the matter of marbles and gingerbread.

It is with affection that I recall him, for, in spite of his eccentricities, and perhaps because of them, I loved him well.—R.I.P.

“Pale fingers moved upon the keys,The ghost hands of past centuries.”

“Pale fingers moved upon the keys,The ghost hands of past centuries.”

From Joseph’s flageolet to one of the finest organs in England—from the scene of “our Rector’s” ministrations to a building that could have swallowed up his church and his school room and all the house property in his parish—was a startling transition for a boy of fourteen.

I wonder how often, during my first experience of a cathedral service, my thoughts travelled back to the tiny hamlet in the west, with its ruined chancel on which the Atlantic had spent its rage, and its few cottages straggling on and up behind an avenue of elms, to where the new church, safe in a sheltered paradise of its own, looks down compassionately upon the wreckage of the past.

In times to come I got to know every nook and corner of the great organ loft at K.It was built in those large minded days before architects had conceived the fatal idea of economising space.  Ascending by a broad staircase that rose with the dignity of an inclined plane, you came out upon a plateau, roomier and more comfortable than many a London flat.  The sanctum of the organist—indeed, the huge instrument itself—were little more than incidents of the loft.  There was a chamber for the wife of the dean, and another chamber for the wife of the organist, together with a library for the Church music; and still there was room in it for blind man’s buff—when the choristers could get the chance.

The organ itself might have been a mile away—so little did you hear of it.  In this respect the loft resembled the deck of a battleship, where the men who work the guns hear least of the explosion.  Only a few muttered growls from the big pipes that lined the walls on either side, or burrowed in the caverns underneath, suggested the proximity of sound.  The crash of the full organ was delivered at a point far above your head, somewhere among the shadowy outlines of the roof.

The space allotted to the dean’s wife onthe other side of the organ was less comfortable than ours, but far more interesting.  The floor outside her enclosure was broken by yawning chasms to give the great pipes breathing room; and though they were of wood, and spoke, as wooden pipes should speak, in hollow muffled tones, they must, I fancy, have confused her devotions and raised a small hurricane about the nape of her neck.

Linking the present to the past were the names of by-gone choristers, carved in schoolboy fashion upon the old oak panels, who had sung their last note a hundred years ago—it might be in this very gallery.  It was easy to picture them passing and re-passing still through the trap door which opened at our feet—a white robed procession of the voiceless dead.

An organ loft is a delightfully irresponsible place from which to take part in a service, especially when the instrument is a large one, well removed from the congregation on the top of a screen—above all, when you do not happen to be the organist.

I would not for an instant be understood to imply that the sense of aloofness necessarily engenders irreverence.  On the contrary, manyof the most solemn hours of my life were passed within the recesses of the great organ at K., and my friend the organist might have been a pattern to the congregation in true devotional spirit.  But the necessities imposed by a choral service afforded him little opportunity for a devotional attitude, while he would have been more, or less, than human if he had not utilised our isolation to impart to me pleasant little details regarding the progress of the service.  These would be interrupted at intervals by parenthetical instructions whenever he wanted help in the management of his stops.

A reminiscence of an organ-loft monologue would read something as follows: “Draw the Gamba,please.  How flat that boy Robinson’s singing; and oh! thoseh’s of his!Principal,please,and now the mixtures.  Green’s getting shaky in his top notes; he only looked at that upper G.Take care;you put in that coupler before I had finished the bar.  What a nuisance it is!  I shall never get a boy like him . . .  The finest hymn written, don’t you think?  (They were singing Stainer’s ‘Saints of God’) . . . and ‘Aurelia’ is the second best.  (Well done! Joseph, I thought;you’re in it after all.)  Get me Wely’s Offertoire in G, will you?  It’s poor stuff, but the people will have it.The Oboe,please,for the air. . .  And now for the scramble . . .Turn over in good time;I can see ahead of me,but I can’t see through the page.”  And he dashed into the finale at the hurricane pace that alone makes the thing endurable.  Even he couldn’t talk till it was done.

Sometimes we were interested in events that were proceeding in the world beneath us.  “What on earth’s the man reading the fifteenth for? it’s the sixteenth that’s the lesson for the day.”  “Oh, it’s Henderson,” would be my reply.  “He always chooses a fine chapter to show off his voice and elocution.  If he’s hauled up for it, he’ll say he did it by mistake.”

On one occasion we were favoured by a reader, fresh from the study of Aristophanes, with the startling announcement that the First Lesson for the day was taken from the Book ofEcclesiazusae.

One day I heard voices in the choir beneath.  I knew, before I saw the speakers reflected from the mirror in front of me, that they were two limp figures in blue serge andcoal-scuttle bonnets.  The strident tones were unmistakeable, the product, in so far as the human throat can compass it, of a long and careful assimilation of the clash of the cymbals.

“A rare fine buildin’, this,” said one, “and what a hinstrument!  I only wish we ’ad it in our place; draw a sight better than drums and cymbals, wouldn’t it?  And a deal noisier.”

“You’re right,” answered the other, “but, for all that, I wouldn’t exchange with that lot to get it.  They deans and chapters and canons, and heaven knows what they calls theirselves, aye, and the bisshup hisself, is that sunk in ignorance and self-conceit that they can’t see the right way; no, nor never will.”

Occasionally, but very rarely, matters went wrong in our own department.  The water that fed the hydraulic gear failed, or was cut off at the main, and the organ “went out” in the middle of an anthem.  One afternoon in November it clouded over so suddenly that we could hardly see our faces in the organ loft.  Worse luck still, the matches were damp, and till I could be back with some more, Dr. H. had to guess at the anthem as best he could.  I amnot musician enough to know how he surmounted the difficulty, but I suspect that the choir that day must have been treated to an amount of improvisation to which they were wholly unaccustomed from an organist who, as a rule, played what he had to play, and rarely indulged in vagaries.

But our worst disaster was of earlier date.  Bildad the Shuhite blew the organ.  He had received that name because he cleaned shoes in a corner of the Close.  It was in prehistoric days before hydraulic gear was dreamed of in connexion with the organ.  As luck would have it, Bildad fell sick, and had to supply a deputy at the last moment.  Dr. H. studied the man carefully, mistrusting, I think, his intelligence.  But his answers were satisfactory, though I thought with the Doctor that he protested too much.  Anyhow, the service was due, and we had no time to waste on our fears.  The singing began, but the organ was irresponsive, and, hurrying to the back of the loft, I found our deputy-blower contemplating with blank stolidity the mechanism at his command, and pleading with an injured air, “Sir, I am a’ waitin’ for you to begin!”

One day I was laboriously extracting discords from the great instrument with Dr. H. at my elbow, when a gentle voice at our side asked for permission to try the instrument.  What a delight it was, after the horrors I had been perpetrating, to see the long fingers charm out the melody, till they drifted at last into the chords of Chopin’s great march.  Surely, I thought, the composer must hear and welcome such a perfect realisation of his wondrous dream.

“Charrlie, me boy, thry the pey-dals,” came a voice from below, with the raciest and most captivating of brogues.  It was my first introduction to Ireland’s great musician—Sir Robert Stewart—and his still greater pupil, composer in prospective of theRequiemandRevenge.

At our next interview the Professor of the future gave me a friendly lecture on Wagner, emphasising his teaching the while by illustrative passages, which he played, I remember, in thick woollen gloves, of which he hadn’t troubled to divest himself, being pressed for time and the organ loft none too warm.  The mechanism of the organ, I am bound to add, was old and antiquated—notas it is in these days, when the notes speak if a fly sits upon them, or you venture to sneeze in their neighbourhood.

I have made acquaintance with strange scenes in an organ loft—an organist of surpassing ability playing through a service when he was drunk, but certainly not incapable.  Yet a deputy sat by him, ready to take his place in case he should prove unequal to retaining his seat at the instrument.  I have seen a fight between two choristers who had been sent to fetch music for the choir.  It began on this wise.  “I can lick you ’ead over ’eels in ’oly ’oly ’oly,” said one.  The taunt was not to be endured by a chorister of spirit, so “Come on!” said the other; and they had fought it out to the bitter end at the back of the organ before ever Dr. H. was aware that the battle was in progress.  I have seen courtship too—ending, as all courtship should do, in matrimony—while the organist played unsuspiciously a soft and dreamy accompaniment.  And I have seen heroism too—grand as any displayed upon a field of battle—when my friend came from his sick bed and played through a service magnificently while the death dew gatheredon his face.  And I coveted, as I never coveted before or since, the divine gift of music, which would have enabled me to spare him his long and patient hour of martyrdom.

And, at the end, he played the Dead March, never knowing that it was for himself he played it, while a furious thunder-storm raged over head, and the roll of the thirty-two-foot pipes was drowned by reverberating peals.  As the final chords came crashing from his hands, he said to me, “Handel must have written it, I think, to an accompaniment like this.  And yet the modern school of organists would have us leave out the drums!  I shall never care to play it again.”

And three weeks afterwards he was dead.

Wasit an escapade, I wonder? or was it something greater and grander?  There are, I suppose, escapades good and bad; heroic and unheroic.

One evening I was tidying up Ronald’s room at Cambridge.  We were both of us in residence now: I as an M.A., while he had just entered as an undergraduate.  He was as studiously untidy as I was the reverse, and, but for me, his room, artistic as it was, would always have looked like a boudoir that had been used over-night for a tap-room.  Pipes, tobacco, and matches met the eye everywhere, scattered among vases of flowers and ferns; no two sheets of theTimeswere together in one place; “Esmond” lay cheek by jowl with “Tom Jones” (the former, I was glad to see, the better worn), while there was more than a suspicion that his surplice was in use as a bed for a litter of kittens.

Ronald himself lay at his ease upon the sofa, watching—I cannot say with interest,but at any rate without prejudice—my improvements for the worse.  But I roused him at last.  In replacing a small box of Italian olive wood I knocked off the lid, and an aggregation of articles unimaginable were scattered on the floor.

“Hullo! stop that, old man,” he said.  “You’ll be losing or breaking some of my most cherished possessions.”

“What on earth are they, Ronald?  Here’s a small crucifix and a missal (you haven’t turned Roman Catholic, have you?) and any amount of rings—most of them brass—and, by Jove, a lock of hair!  Is the last a love token?  It looks uncommonly like the relic of another escapade.  Did it belong to the girl who played the harmonium on the beach at Bayview?  I didn’t know you’d got so far as that.  Besides, her hair was light, if I remember.  Out with it, old man, and clear your conscience by confession.”

“Have done with your jokes, Fred; you’re the last fellow to chaff like that if you knew the rights of it.  And, if I must tell you, I must.  But I didn’t want you to know of the matter; it looks too much like boasting.  However, you find out everything I do; soI may as well tell you all about this, before you hunt it up for yourself in some underhand way, or make a tale out of it that isn’t the true one.  You know Richards, Fred; the man my uncle made me travel with last autumn—to see the world, as he called it.  I never liked the fellow, and always thought him a cad; but I didn’t know till then that he was a coward as well as a cad.”

“I always thought him both,” was my reply.

“Taormina in Sicily was one of the places we stopped at: the loveliest spot that you could dream of, if you dreamed your hardest.  You’ve never been there, have you?  Well: the town itself is a fair day’s walk up hill from the sea, and Mola’s another day’s walk above that; by which time you’ve nearly reached the clouds—only, as it happens, Sicily doesn’t boast of any.  But you needn’t go higher than Taormina for the loveliest view on earth.  They may talk of seeing Madrid, Seville, Naples, and a hundred other places, and then dying contented—why, there’s none of them that’s a patch on Taormina.  Sit down in the proscenium of the old theatre, facing Etna, with the Straits of Messina and the foot ofItaly laid out like a map on your left: and you can do without another view for the rest of your natural life.  The only objection we found to it was that in September of last year it was most awfully hot, and Taormina is pestiferous enough to be a Turkish settlement.  It is worse, I think, than the old town of Granada, which is perhaps the filthiest place that I know in Europe.  The cholera, too, was about last year, especially in Italy; and, if itdidcross the Straits, Taormina was ripe and handy for it.

“After we’d been there for a week or so itdidcome with a vengeance.  First a suspicious case or two, then a case that was not suspicious at all, and then it fell like a thunderbolt on the town.  Richards was off directly, and with him everyone in the place who could afford to go; so the poorer people, with their old priest, who stuck to his work like a man, had it all to themselves.

“Now it looks like boasting, but I didn’t like to run.  Besides, I had come there for a fortnight, and I was fond of the place and the view and the old theatre—so why go?  Anyhow I didn’t budge, and did what I could to help the old man in his difficulty—it was littleenough.  However, I had heaps of money, and they wanted that more than anything.  And he taught me something about medicine—what little he knew of it; though, after all, nothing but stimulants at one stage and opium at another seemed to do them the slightest good.

“What a time it was!  I pray that I may never stand face to face with cholera again.  Overhead, a sky like brass, and, veiling the town, a dusky, steel-blue haze, almost as palpable as gauze: the distinctive colour (I’ve been told) of a cholera atmosphere.  They died like flies, crowded in their close, evil-smelling dwellings, though we lighted fires in the streets to clear the air; an idea I borrowed, I believe, from ‘Old St. Paul’s.’

“Late one evening I hurried from a sick room to get a breath of air in the theatre below.  My friend, the old priest, was there before me.  This was an unusual coincidence, as he scarcely ever gave himself a moment’s rest.  Yet he might have done so now, for in ten days’ time the disease abated as rapidly as it had begun.  And besides, he had organised a band of fairly efficient helpers.

“‘Good evening, signor,’ he said.  ‘You seeme in my church; for I find in it the same relief that my brethren in the cities find within the walls of a cathedral.  To me it would seem a poor exchange—for what cathedral built by man could match this view?’  As he spoke he pointed through the ruined arches to where Etna towered in the distance.  Surely the noblest drop-scene ever fashioned by the hand of nature, and not unworthily framed by the artist who had designed the theatre.  Between the ruined columns on the left a steamer, environed by a little group of feluccas, made a series of dissolving views as it overtook and passed them on the sea below.  But I saw he had some trouble on his mind over and above his care for his patients.

“‘Take courage, padre mio.  The worst is over.  That shroud of steel-blue mist is lifting day by day.  I should like to know what causes it.  I believe if we had had the power of gauging it, its changes would have made no bad register of the death-rate in the town.’

“‘You are right, my son; the worstispast; and, thanks mainly to you, I have been enabled to do my duty while it lasted.  Without you I could have done little.  Takean old man’s thanks, signor, on behalf of those who are left and those who are gone.  Neither the one nor the other will ever forget you, here or in the world that holds them now.  Yet I could almost wish that you had never come.’

“‘Why so?’ I asked.

“‘I wish, at any rate’ (speaking with more vehemence than his wont), ‘that you had not brought with you that false-hearted friend of yours.’

“‘You mean Richards.  Yes, he is a coward to run away like that.’

“‘Worse, far worse.  You know little Ninetta well, who lives at your lodgings up the hill—the prettiest girl in Taormina they call her, and I fancy they are right.  She is down with the cholera—didn’t you know it?  Taken this morning, and, unless I am wrong in my judgment, it is one of the worst cases we have had—hopeless, I should say, from the very first.’

“‘Poor little Ninetta!  It does seem hard; taken, too, just when the disease was dying out.  But what has Richards to do with it?’

“‘The confessional is sacred, my friend.  But it may be that, in this one case, thecholera has struck in kindliness.  Though I am sorry he should be away when he might have made her end more peaceful.  Even when I left her to come and find you, she was perpetually calling for him.  Put her off with excuses; it won’t be for long.  Don’t let her think him a coward as well as a villain.  If you weren’t a heretic, I would absolve you beforehand for any necessary evasion.’

“‘You may be sure I’ll do my best.  The evasions won’t lie heavy upon my conscience.  Goodnight.’

“There was no hope for her, as he had said.  During the early stage of her illness she was always asking for him—wondering why he stayed away—for I obeyed the priest’s injunctions, and never told her he’d been coward enough to run.  As she got worse, she began to wander, and, from having seen us so often together, she would confuse him with me; and, at the last, was perfectly happy so long as I was with her; calling me by his name, and thanking him, as she imagined, for all his care and kindness to her.  The lock of hair that puzzled you is hers.  She gave it to me just before she died (she had nothing else to give, poor girl) in the belief she was giving itto Richards.  And then, quite quietly, still in the belief that he was with her, and that it was his hand and not mine that she was holding, she died.

“There you have the story, Fred, such as it is.  All the other things were given me by the villagers—the few of them, that is, who lived—all except the missal, which came from my old friend the priest.  It was his most cherished possession; given, I believe, in the hope of converting me.  Well, if conversion would make me another such as he was, I wouldn’t say no to it.

“Shall I ever see him again, I wonder?  Some day, Fred, you and I will go and hunt him up.”

IHAVEbeen looking through all my old letters to-night.  It is a strange sensation in these days, when the shuttle spins so fast, to re-read the letters between childhood and manhood.  All details seem softened, viewed through the haze of time.  Human nature was (or so it seems to one) so much kindlier then than now.  What pleasant ghosts are raised by these old letters; what touches that one missed in them in the hurried, feverish days when they were written!  In so very many cases, too, the hands that penned them are still.  I have come upon one from Ronald, written when he was just twenty-five.  It is singularly devoid of romance, compared with many of the others, and has “brisked me up” considerably, when I was verging on melancholia.

“Dear Fred(it runs),“I shall want you for a wedding a month hence.  Guess the name of the happy lady.  No more escapades from—Yours respectably,“Ronald.”

“Dear Fred(it runs),

“I shall want you for a wedding a month hence.  Guess the name of the happy lady.  No more escapades from—Yours respectably,

“Ronald.”

Who was she? and how had he managed it? were the questions I asked myself at the time.  Somehow or other, I couldn’t imagine Ronald proposing to his lady-love in a conventional, Christianlike way.  True, time had sobered him considerably.  He was now a handsome young fellow, living quietly and sedately with his uncle at Broadwater; not easy to recognise as the lad who had discomfited an itinerant preacher, and played the stable-boy on the race-course at Bayview.  But the spirit of Bohemianism dies hard, and I was possessed with the idea that, even in the act of “placing himself” for life, Ronald would make opportunity for a final fling.  He was having a really bad time of it with his uncle, and, in spite of occasional outbursts, when the Viking blood got the better of him, had been fairly amenable to discipline.  The old man, I know, must have been a constant thorn in his flesh; very selfish, and very dogmatic on all points, especially politics.  If he could have reasoned logically himself, or have listened to reason in others, he would have been less objectionable.  But he formed his opinions on grounds as strictly illogical as does the average woman, and, todo him justice, never abandoned them.  For example:

“What a grand speech that was of Gladstone’s yesterday, Ronald!”

“Do you think so, sir?  It seemed a trifle commonplace to me in comparison with Dizzy’s reply.”

“Pshaw!  Dizzy’s no speaker at all compared with him.”

“Did you ever hear him, sir?”

“Never—and don’t want to.”

“Then you have read his speeches, sir?”

“Never—and I hope I never may.”

This was his recognised line of argument (Heaven save the mark!) on all topics.  Yet to differ from any of his conclusions was a most serious offence, which Ronald in time learned how to avoid.  His own part in a conversation became limited to a series of characterless phrases—“Yes, sir,” “No, sir,” “Of course, sir”—which passed muster as entirely satisfactory.  Occasionally, it is true, they were flavoured with a salt of sarcasm, but as this only rebounded harmlessly, without piercing his uncle’s pachydermatous hide, the peace was seldom broken between them.  Outsiders were less merciful.

“Growing a trifle dogmatical is Heyward, isn’t he?”—one club member would say to another—when a theory, accepted obediently by my uncle’s household, had been thrust a little prematurely down a stranger’s throat.  “But there: he’s getting on in years—sixty, I should say, if he’s a day—and we shall all of us like our own way then.  Indeed, youngsters like it too, as a Master of Trinity found with his junior Fellows.  ‘Not one of us is infallible,’ he said to them, ‘not even the youngest.’”

It was a gentlemanly face, was old Heyward’s, though, if you happened to be a judge of faces, you would probably have added “a weak one.”  Yes, and—No.  Not strong, certainly, in intellect or knowledge, though the features are scored with deep-cut lines, that might be mistaken by the casual observer for traces of reflective thought.  But lines traced by the hand of intellect ennoble and brighten the face, even in the act of carving it; these had only soured and embittered it.  Such strength as they show is the strength of a dogged persistency, which clings to an opinion, right or wrong, because it admits no counter argument, and always carries its point by a process of blank obstructiveness.  Buteach victory thus gained is of the nature of a defeat, narrowing and confining the soul still more within its self-imposed limits, deafening it to the interests of an outer world, and to the joys and sorrows of humanity at large.

His sister was a tall, angular woman, with thin, compressed lips and a cold, grey eye, betokening a far more active and aggressive will.  But probably no two people were ever more entirely in harmony, till Ronald sowed dissension between them.  Even dissimilarities, in their case, became points of agreement.  For instance, the uncle read much and forgot all that he read, while she read nothing and had consequently nothing to forget.  Then again, they were united in their devotion to comfort, for which each required the other.  Wider forms of attachment they ignored and dispensed with, as unprofitable for the furtherance of the main issue.  Friends, servants, animals, who were found detrimental, simply disappeared without comment, as unobtrusively as did the obnoxious teachers in Madame Beck’s famouspensionnatin the Rue Fossette.

In the art of “nagging” our uncle was supreme, bearing out Sarah Grand’s theory that women are nowhere in this province,which has been reckoned peculiarly their own.  Curling himself up gracefully in his favourite armchair, and lighting a cigar, he would prepare himself to enjoy it.  Sometimes the attack would be sudden and wanting in delicacy.

“Ronald, I wish you could manage to be down in time for dinner.”  Ronald, be it observed, had been five minutes late, but yet five minutes prior to its announcement by the butler.

“My tie was so infern—intolerably hard to fasten, sir.  I must get aJemima.”

“AJemima!” shouted the uncle—scandalised at the idea of Ronald contemplating the introduction of some rustic handmaid—“What on earth do you mean?”

“A hand-made tie, sir.”  (The pun is yours, old man, not mine.  Besides, the uncle wouldn’t have seen it, even if he’d given me the chance.—R.)

A mollified pause of ten minutes.  The next time he would preface his thrust with a feint, to throw Ronald off his guard.

“What a wonderfully nice young fellow Carter is.  Gets himself up as if he were living in town.  Idolike to see a fellow weara tall hat on Sunday; it’s far and away more respectable than a round one.”

Ronald was incorrigible in this respect, and became as the deaf adder.

Five minutes’ grace.

“How that fellow Stanton did talk at dinner; one couldn’t get a word in edgeways.  By-the-by, I thinkyoutalk a little too freely, Ronald, to men older and wiser than yourself.”

“Semper ego auditor tantum?” muttered Ronald.

“What is it you are saying, Ronald?  I do wish you would speak up.”

“I said I would only listen in future, sir.Nunquamne reponam?” (the lattersotto voce).

“There you are—muttering again.”

“I was only saying I wished I could write a book, sir.”

Miss Heyward couldn’t hold a candle to her brother in this particular department.  She lacked altogether the delicacy of “finesse” which is essential to its development, and, strange to say, possessed in a high degree by people of feeble intelligence.  But she seconded him bravely in cases where temper and determination would serve its purpose.Here it was to advocate stronger measures, and hers was the master mind.  She was not without a suspicion that time and reiteration had blunted the edge of her brother’s innuendo.  When therefore she was called in for consultation, Ronald knew that it betokened a definite and concerted campaign.  He would be sent to Coventry, or fed on roast pork, and specialities that his soul abhorred, or (but for his age) have been whipped.  Finally, and in the last resort, his pocket money would be docked—a punishment that was known to be effective.  Spending little upon himself, he had always a band of pensioners who were dependent on him for assistance.  So it was through them that he could most surely be reached.  “Seething the kid in the mother’s milk,” as we are told in ‘Kenilworth,’ is an occupation that offers a wide field to the ingenuity of the inventive.

“Two’s company and three’s none,” muttered Ronald, when, on entering a room suddenly, he found an animated conversation drop suddenly into silence, while an echo of his own escapades and iniquities lingered in the air.

A strange and melancholy life it was for a lad of Ronald’s temperament; a strange and incongruous fellowship:

“For East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”

“For East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet”

Yet it had in it one redeeming feature.  Only a mile from Broadwater, in the white house that nestles in the heart of the valley, just visible to us over a depression in the lulls, lived a young widow of twenty-eight—Ronald’s dearest friend, and his comforter and consoler whenever the monotony of existence seemed almost intolerable to the lad just entering on manhood.

The coalition between Ronald and Mrs. Thorpe was regarded with extreme disfavour by the uncle.  “Making a milksop of the lad,” he called it sneeringly.  But the villagers, one and all of them, were emphatic in their praise.  “A nice couple they’d make,” said old widow Denvers.  “I only hope it may come off, and that I may be alive to see it.  And love each other they do already, unless my old eyes deceive me.  See how he follers her about and well nigh wusshups the groundshe treads on.  Why he’d be at Thorpe Hill all day, if only that old aunt of his didn’t watch him like a cat.  Drat her!”

A feeling of companionship had steadily grown up between them.  The almost daily meetings and constant interchange of ideas had produced their natural result, and the companionship that had at first been a pleasure had long become a necessity.  Yet, strange to say, neither had recognised the fact.  Ronald himself would have scouted the idea.  Possessed of not a penny in his own rights, and dependent only on what his uncle allowed him, he would have ridiculed the notion of asking the richest woman in the county to become his wife.  Indeed it was the deterrent influence of their relative positions that had excluded the possibility from finding a place among the contingencies of his life.  Yet she it was, however unwittingly, who was the cause of Ronald’s last escapade.

The idea had frequently occurred to him that she had inspired his uncle with the nearest approximation to love of which his nature was capable.  Not according to the accepted traditions of lovemaking, nor exhibited in a manner that would be patent to the world at large.  Buthe showed her attentions that he withheld from all other women.  He would enquire solicitously after her health, and the health of her dogs, in huge Grandisonian phrases; above all, he would vacate for her his favourite armchair, and waive her into it with a bow of old-world politeness.  (To his sister, who ruled his household, the chair in question was rigorously debarred).  Then again, she was a Liberal in politics.  Not that this counted for much, because he maintained that women should be allowed no politics at all, beyond presenting a feeble reflex of the man who was nearest or dearest to them.  Much as he hated Conservatism, he would sooner have seen the wife of his friend Jacobs pose as the rankest of Tories, than at variance with her husband in a way so subversive of the relation of the sexes.

“What a blessing it is to get across here for a change of air,” said Ronald, flinging himself down on a chair in Mrs. Thorpe’s drawing-room, where she was arranging her flowers for the day.

“Well, what’s the matter now?  Is it the aunt or the uncle who has ruffled you this morning?”

“Not so much the people as the atmosphere.  The air seems laden with small trivialities.  I feel like the man in ‘Pilgrim’s Progress,’ who lived in a cloud of dust that he was constantly raising.  Whereas life ought to be lived on a breezy upland, with your face to the sea.”

“I think I understand what you mean, though your reminiscences of Bunyan are a trifle mixed.  And perhaps the dust is better for you.”

“Not a bit of it, when it’s of one’s own making.  Nowyouhaven’t a scrap of dust in your house.”

“I’m not so sure.  Look at that piano.  Anyhow, you didn’t come all this way so early in the morning to treat me to a revised version of Bunyan’s allegory.  What’s the matter, Ronald?”

“I believe the old man’s jealous of me.  He says I’m over here too often—that people are beginning to talk, and all manner of rot.  I’m almost sure he wants to marry you himself.”

“My dear boy, you’re dreaming.  Do you think that I would abandon my independence, and all my advanced theories on women, to adopt your uncle’s musty, antediluvian ideas?Not a bit of it.  Why I’d sooner marryyou, if the worst came to the worst, though even that wouldn’t suit me either.”

“It would suitme,” muttered Ronald, “just down to the ground.”

The uncle’s sight had of late been failing him, owing to some weakness or lesion of the nerve that no spectacles could remedy.  Under these circumstances, his favourite amanuensis was Ronald; for, though I regret to say it, his sister’s spelling was occasionally defective, and his uncle was particular above all things that his correspondence should be strictly orthographic.  Not that this characteristic could be imputed to Miss Heyward as a fault, especially in these days, when even Peeresses (I am told) have adopted phonetic spelling, and orthography has been relegated to our village schools as the symbol of a lower and less intellectual class.  But the uncle was conservative in everything but politics, and regarded the innovation as a forecast of the nation’s decadence.

One morning he called Ronald into his study, with a thoughtful, pre-occupied air that betokened business of more than average importance.

“Ronald, I’m thinking of marrying—and who do you suppose is my choice?  A great friend of yours by the way, Mrs. Thorpe.  I like her amazingly; a most well-bred woman, who will look famously at the head of my table.  Then again, she’s got money, though it’s true I don’t want it.  And her property marches with mine; and we’ll enclose it all in a ring fence, and have the finest estate in the county.  She’s got a few crotchets, I know, but they’ll soon be ousted when she’s found a sensible man to advise her.  I grant I’m a trifle old for her, but people think nothing of that in these days when the fault is on the right side.  What do you say to it? a good idea, isn’t it?”

“Very good indeed, sir,” said Ronald—demurely, but doubtingly.

“You ain’t very hearty about it, Ronald.  I expected you to jump at the suggestion.  Indeed, I thought you were a little gone on her yourself, and would have welcomed her warmly for your aunt.  You’re across at her house pretty well every day.”

“Yes, sir, I am; and I do like her very much.  Indeed, I wouldn’t have minded marrying her myself.”

“Good Lord! if that doesn’t beat everything!  A mere boy like you, without a penny in the world except what you get from me—and I’m not dead yet by a long way, Ronald—youto be in love with the richest woman in the county!  God bless me!  What are the boys coming to?  But there—it’s nonsense.  Put it out of your head, my lad, and sit down and write what I tell you.”

The letter, when it was forwarded, ran thus:

“Dear Mrs. Thorpe,“I write on a subject that touches very nearly the happiness of my future life (‘it touches mine, R.’)  You must have seen, I imagine, how much I have admired and loved you (‘my sentiments exactly R.’); nor can you be blind to the fact that no other woman occupies the place in my esteem which has been wholly given to you (‘couldn’t have expressed myself better, R.’)  I now offer you my hand and heart (‘savours of the complete letter writer, but true notwithstanding, R.’), together with all my worldly possessions (‘£50, all included, R.’)  You know, I fancy, my ways and habits as no other woman can know them (‘too well by half, R.’)  My temper is equable, and I am, I think, companionable (‘query? R.’)  My nephew Ronald will continue to live with us; you know him well (‘I should just think so, R.’)  He is a really good-hearted, well-meaning lad (‘thanks,old man, R.’), but a little uppish at times, and thinks he knows everything, like all the boys of the present day (‘I retract my thanks, R.’)  But I fancy that you and he will get on together (‘admirably, R.’)“I shall await your answer with impatience, and anxiously hope it may be favourable (‘to me, R.’)“I remain,“Your sincere admirer,“A.Heyward.”(‘Your loving friend, R.’)

“Dear Mrs. Thorpe,

“I write on a subject that touches very nearly the happiness of my future life (‘it touches mine, R.’)  You must have seen, I imagine, how much I have admired and loved you (‘my sentiments exactly R.’); nor can you be blind to the fact that no other woman occupies the place in my esteem which has been wholly given to you (‘couldn’t have expressed myself better, R.’)  I now offer you my hand and heart (‘savours of the complete letter writer, but true notwithstanding, R.’), together with all my worldly possessions (‘£50, all included, R.’)  You know, I fancy, my ways and habits as no other woman can know them (‘too well by half, R.’)  My temper is equable, and I am, I think, companionable (‘query? R.’)  My nephew Ronald will continue to live with us; you know him well (‘I should just think so, R.’)  He is a really good-hearted, well-meaning lad (‘thanks,old man, R.’), but a little uppish at times, and thinks he knows everything, like all the boys of the present day (‘I retract my thanks, R.’)  But I fancy that you and he will get on together (‘admirably, R.’)

“I shall await your answer with impatience, and anxiously hope it may be favourable (‘to me, R.’)

“I remain,

“Your sincere admirer,

“A.Heyward.”(‘Your loving friend, R.’)

The answer came next day, and was a crushing blow to my uncle’s hopes.  She thanked him gratefully for the offer, and regretted the disappointment her answer would cause him.  But her affections, she said, had long been bestowed on his nephew, and she had lately hadreason to believe(italics at Ronald’s request) that the feeling was reciprocated.  She was in a position, she added, to disregard monetary considerations in the choice of a husband.

* * * *

There was strife within the gates of Broadwater on the announcement of Ronald’s engagement.  The uncle was furious at being supplanted this second time, and, to make matters worse, the offender in this case wasthe nephew of his choice.  So wroth was he that he nearly made me his heir out of spite, and, for two or three days, my price rose considerably on the matrimonial market.  But, on giving tongue to his wrath, he found himself without a supporter.  “A servile war had broken out” (to quote from ‘Cometh up,’—sweetest of all love stories, but, GreatDionysius! what Greek!) and his sister was in a state of open rebellion.  It was she who headed the rising, and with her went all the servants, which left our uncle in a minority of one.  She was, naturally enough, well pleased at the progress of events, and anticipated with satisfaction the continuance of her reign.

Ronald, so soon as his month’s probation was ended, was thankful to be received out of the fray into the sanctuary of Thorpe.  Not that he was at peace, even there.  His conscience gave him twinges, and I had a word to say to him on the subject, and his wife had a word or two more.  But it was all for his good, and he had brought it upon himself by treating matrimony (of all estates in the world) in a spirit of graceless levity.

* * * * *

And what of myself?  Well, reader, I had lost my chance, or, perhaps, willingly foregone it.  All Ronald’s pet schemes had been safe in my hands, and I was little likely to oppose the present one, when, almost from the first, I had pictured its realisation, and seen how necessary it was to the happiness and stability of his life.  My unselfishness—call it passivity if you will—carried with it its own reward, for neither of the two was happy without me, and Thorpe Hill practically became my home.

Ronaldbecame her ‘fidus Achates’ and Lord High Almoner in all her acts of charity.  Occasionally, it is true, he misunderstood or exceeded his instructions, as, for instance, when he went round with a parcel of physic to a sick cottager.

“How be I to take ’m? did she tell ’e?”

“No: she didn’t, but she meant all, I suppose, unless it’s written inside.”

This was a large order, as the parcel contained castor oil, a black draught, and six blue pills.

“And which be I to take fust?  She must ha’ told ’e that.”

Again Ronald was at fault.

“Much, I allow, as the gentry do their vittles—solids fust, and drinks atterwards.”

The prescriptions, whatever the order observed in their administration, answered to perfection, and Ronald’s fame was greatly magnified by the result.  His drugs were inhigh request everywhere, and were reported to be “powerfully fine.”

One day his wife said to him, “Ronald, would you like to hear a project I have in hand for reclaiming a pet drunkard?”

“Very much: what is it?”

“I shall give him a dog.”

“Good Lord! how will that help him?  It reminds one of a story in the ‘Arabian Nights,’ where somebody with a crack-jaw name gives to somebody else—a porter, I think it was—a lump of lead, promising it will make his fortune.  But he wisely declined to specify by what particular method the charm would work.  I think the man weighted a fish-line with it, and caught a salmon with a diamond in its mouth.  But you can hardly expect your scheme to work like that.”

“Wait and see, Ronald.  I read in a German story book the other day how a dog had turned a man into an early riser (I shall give you one, Ronald), and made him charitable, and religious, and all the rest of it.  Surely I can trust my dog to reclaim a man from one single failing.”

“I should like to see how he’s going to do it,” said Ronald incredulously.  “The chancesare yourprotégéwill take his dog the first day to the nearest public-house.  And, if he gets biscuits there, as a nice dog is sure to do, he’ll want no coaxing to take his master there every day.  And the last state of that man will be worse than the first.”

“I am afraid there is no worse possible in this case.  At any rate I have faith in my dog.”

The next day a ragged little hound, called “Judy,” was selected from the kennels at Thorpe Hill, and despatched to theprotégéin question.  Pure white she was, and so small, that, at a shift, you could hold her in the hollow of your hand.  A veritable little mongrel, of course, if ever there was one.  Indeed, nothing but a mongrel would have had the capacity for so delicate a mission.  For, as we all know, it is to the mongrel that we look for intelligence and originality.  The consciousness of inherited merit is fatal to intellectual progress in an animal of pedigree.  Partiality—but only the most prejudiced—might have called Judy a rough Irish terrier.  Only her ears didn’t lop, but were carried erect like a donkey’s, and her legs were too long, and her tail had an ugly “kinck” in it.

Having abused her sufficiently for her personal appearance, let me add that she had the sweetest and most winning of faces—chiefly composed of eyes, which were so large in comparison with the rest of her features that they seemed to swallow them up, giving to the face, as a whole, the thin, troubled look of premature age, which is so pathetic in any sick animal.  But Judy was far from being delicate, and enjoyed to the full the zest and sparkle of life.  With her head on one side, and her ears pricked up, and attention bestowed on the curl of her tail, a matter in which she was often negligent, she would have matched the best of them as a study of arrested life.

The two—the dog and the young reprobate she was expected to reform—took to each other with all their hearts, and soon became inseparable.  But at first Ronald’s pessimistic prophecy seemed likely to be realised.  True to his natural instinct, her master took Judy at once to the nearest public-house, and, as the biscuits due to an intelligent dog were always forthcoming, Judy fell in entirely with her master’s view as to the direction their daily walk should take.  Ronald triumphedmaliciously but prematurely.  For Judy was to be recalled to her duty by a stern dispensation.

It happened one day, that, as she and her master were starting, a troop of bicyclists came scorching down the hill, and Judy, caught off her guard and losing her head, was run over, and taken up for dead.  After long days of anxious nursing she was called slowly back to life, at least to a measure of life.  But the little dog’s nerve was gone.  From that day forward no persuasion could tempt her to follow her master along the public road.  Warned by experience, she dreaded bicyclists at every turning.  Just so far as the garden gate, and no further, she would follow him, and, with a thin little feeble whine, plead almost in words for a change of route.  But the master’s heart was steeled.  It was to be a conflict of will between them.  And which was to conquer? the dog or the man?  For days and weeks the result trembled in the scale.  But the walk grew dreary apart from his companion, and, going and returning, he was haunted by the piteous whine.  Then at last he succumbed.  The day’s walk along the high road was exchanged for a run in the nearest field or common, and Judy’s heart rejoiced, and herspirit came again to her, and she became—almost, but never quite—her natural self again.

Thenceforth the sympathy between these two was complete.  When Judy was ill again, almost to death, she was restful nowhere but in her master’s presence.  When he left the room, her eyes would languidly follow him; when he came back, they kindled to life again, breathed into by a new spirit; and when he took her in his arms, all pain and disquiet ceased, and she lay neither shivering nor moaning—lost to all feeling but the satisfied assurance of his love.

“Well, Ronald, and how about my experiment?”

“You’ve beaten me,” was the reply.  “What a wonderful woman you are!”

“In quo tam similem videbis IssamUt sit tam similis sibi nec ipsa.”Martial.

“In quo tam similem videbis IssamUt sit tam similis sibi nec ipsa.”

Martial.

She was a very little dog with a very large soul, and all her soul looked out of her eyes.  No one whom she loved could doubther love, when once her eyes had assumed their final expression.  “I am your friend for life,” they said, “and for death—and perhaps beyond it.”

In the frivolous days of her youth she had snapped at the knickerbockers of a chubby errand boy, and been promptly handed over for punishment.  But she broke from the executioner under the indignity of the first stroke, and fled for refuge to her master’s bedroom, from which no efforts could dislodge her.  So, making the best of a bad business, he took to his bed too for company’s sake.  Judy was deeply touched by this practical sympathy, and it formed, I believe, the historic ground-work of their life-long friendship.

Her pedigree was mixed.  Her father was a white English terrier of unimpeachable breed, who lived a sober, self-contained existence, with no friend but the postman, whom he followed conscientiously on all his rounds of delivery.  Her mother was the daughter of a “King Charles,” who had been woo’d and won by a fox.  Fair and frail, she was careless of the duties of life, and passed her time in eating and sleeping, sleeping and eating—she is sleeping and eating still, the latter with anever increasing appetite as the time at her disposal grows less.

Judy repudiatedin totoher maternal parentage, and reproduced all the best characteristics of her father, combined with a brilliant intelligence, and a far wider appreciation of the sympathies of life.  Her minor peculiarities were borrowed from those of a cat.  She sat like a cat, pounced like a cat, and washed her face like a cat, using either or both of her paws with a truly feline indifference.  She could climb bushes, too, hanging on by her teeth, to the detriment of any unwary fledgling who presumed over confidently upon the limitation of natural gifts.

Judy often came on a visit to Thorpe Hill, where she regularly spent an hour after dinner in digging at the root of a favourite beech tree, with the energy of a dog that is close on a prize.  From which I inferred that she was a truffle-terrier in disguise, who would make all our fortunes, and set Matthew to dig in her place till he blasphemed against Judy and the truffles and me.  But Matthew didn’t put his heart into his work, or realise the fact that Judy’s credit was at stake.  And I always believed in her more than I did in him.  Lateron she justified my confidence—not, I admit, by a discovery of truffles, but (better still) of a full-grown Roman or Anglo-Saxon, crouching among his household divinities.  Judy was complacently proud of him as a very superior find, in spite of Matthew’s sneer, “Tweren’t triffles,Iknowed,” and forthwith transferred her attentions to a neighbouring tree, under which, for all I know, others of his family may still be reposing.

It is humbling to admit that she was wholly devoid of tricks, properly so called: partly because no one had troubled to teach her any, and partly, I think, because she accounted it a waste of time to try and acquire them.  No one who studied her thoughtful little face could doubt that she held higher and more recondite theories of the responsibilities of life.

It was probably the same reason that led her to pass her days in silence.  Few objects she thought were worth the trouble involved of setting in motion the harsh and cumbrous method by which alone a dog converses—certainly not meat and drink, and therefore she declined to ask for them.  The prospect of a walk, or the sight of a blackbird deridingher from a twig, formed the only exceptions and proved the rule.  Otherwise Judy would have been a canine Trappist.  And her reticence was the more remarkable, seeing that her mother passed her time in futile and vociferous talking.  Probable Judy regarded her as an object lesson and a warning.  She was certainly disdainful of her noise.

But she had two natural gifts: you may call them tricks if you will.  She took her meals like a Christian, seated, or rather kneeling, at table beside her master, with her paws doubled under her knees.  From this post of vantage she would watch the whole proceedings of dinner with the curiosity of an epicure.  But dining on her own account offered little attraction.  The position of her paws, it is true, suggested an attitude of devotion and gained for her the reputation of saying grace before meat.  But her own diet was strictly limited to morsels of bread and biscuit, which she received with indifference, and apparently without gratitude.  It may be that she dined in the night-time, as Amina did with the ghoul.  If so, I hope she selected more desirable company.

She had one other peculiarity.  I cannotcall it an accomplishment, though it found her a number of admirers.  After studying you intently with eyes that looked you through and through, as though she were appraising carefully your capacity for friendship, she would raise a delicate fur-capped paw, and lay it gently upon your nose—never anywhere else.  It was a favour accorded to no stranger, never indeed till she had known you for months.  For it was an oath of allegiance, emblematic as the solemn transfusion of blood, and renewable on occasion, if you cared to elicit it by staring her well out of countenance.  Yet it was trying to be reminded of the fact when you were kneeling at prayers in full view of the servants, simply because Judy regarded your attitude and surroundings as a ceremonial specially designed for the re-enactment of her vow.

Being a good friend, Judy was, by consequence, an equally good nurse.  The attributes of the two are indeed strangely akin, if the latter be not a natural development of the former.  For in sickness, as in sorrow, there are times when a sympathetic silence is a better restorative than more obtrusive remedies.  Her master found it so when Judynursed him for four months at a stretch, sacrificing without a whine the most brilliant summer on record.  Cleverer than many a nurse or doctor, she inferred his condition from certain changes of face and expression, unappreciable by their less intuitive faculties.  Satisfied by a careful inspection that he was for the moment improving, she would fall back on the pillow with a sigh of satisfaction, till he was restless again, or till the time came—she knew it as well as did the nurse—when he had to be roused for his medicine.

Judy was sorry, I fancy, on her own account when the days of her nursing were ended by her master’s recovery.  For she never disguised her real sentiments, whether creditable or the reverse, differing therein from the race of men, at whose feelings and motives one can only hazard a bewildered guess.

Judy taught her master many things: among them how to win the love of her community.  Jealousy, it seems, is the family failing.  It is idle, she told him, to imagine that a few scraps of half-hearted affection can claim the devotion of a life.  Careless, casual attentions may gratify an unexacting dog;they can never win his heart’s love.  It is not for pity’s sake, as some will tell you, that the mongrel of the streets is attracted by preference to the vagabond and outcast, who is as lonely as himself; rather, because he feels that here at any rate is a field unoccupied, a mine of sympathy that will royally repay for working.

But let the master of his affection form other and more engrossing ties, and the love that he has given he will infallibly withdraw—not hastily, capriciously, or for the moment, but slowly, deliberately, and for ever—at what cost to himself is happily not ours to fathom.

“They sin who tell as love can die.”Southey.

“They sin who tell as love can die.”

Southey.

Back to IndexNext