FOOTNOTES:[73]Sir James Murray says, ‘This is not logical: 19 May 1862 is.Beginat day,ascendto month,ascendto year; notbeginat month,descendto day, thenascendto year.’ (But I fear we must continue for the present to print May 19, 1862: authors generally will not accept the logical form.—H. H.)[74]In references of this nature different forms are used, as—ff., foll., et seq. Whichever form is adopted, the practice should be uniform throughout the work.
[73]Sir James Murray says, ‘This is not logical: 19 May 1862 is.Beginat day,ascendto month,ascendto year; notbeginat month,descendto day, thenascendto year.’ (But I fear we must continue for the present to print May 19, 1862: authors generally will not accept the logical form.—H. H.)
[73]Sir James Murray says, ‘This is not logical: 19 May 1862 is.Beginat day,ascendto month,ascendto year; notbeginat month,descendto day, thenascendto year.’ (But I fear we must continue for the present to print May 19, 1862: authors generally will not accept the logical form.—H. H.)
[74]In references of this nature different forms are used, as—ff., foll., et seq. Whichever form is adopted, the practice should be uniform throughout the work.
[74]In references of this nature different forms are used, as—ff., foll., et seq. Whichever form is adopted, the practice should be uniform throughout the work.