332“Origine de tous les Cultes,” t. i., p. 77.333Fortnightly Review, vol. vi., n. s., p. 563.334DupuisOp. cit., t. iii., “De la Sphere,” p. 19.335“Custom and Myth,” 2nd edition, p. 262.336As to supposed use of the totem as a tattoo mark, see M’Lennan,loc. cit., p. 418, and Smith’s “Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia,” p. 213,et seq.337“Origin of Civilisation,” 3rd edition, p. 199.338Ditto, p. 327.339Ditto, p. 253.340“Primitive Culture,” vol. ii., p. 215.341Loc. cit., p. 422.342Dupuis “Abrégé de l’Origine,” pp. 71, 83.343Ditto, p. 66.344English edition, p. 250.345Ditto, p. 145.346Ditto, p. 255.347Op. cit., p. 167,et seq.348“American Hero-Myths,” p. 65.349“Les Mœurs des Sauvages,” t. i., 465.350See Gubernatis’ “Zoological Mythology,”passim. Dr. Brinton shows that the Great Rabbit of Algonkin Mythology is the Light God.—Op. cit., p. 47.351“Chaldean Magic,” p. 228.352Ditto, p. 231.353Fortnightly Review, vol. vii., n. s., p. 212.354Op. cit., p. 199.355This idea survives in the personal patron saints of the Greek Church. The special god was of a peculiar character, “partaking of the imperfections and foibles of human nature,” and, like the Mazdianfravishi, it was part of the man’s soul. Lenormant says, however, that in the Mazdian books, “the conception rose to a higher degree, detaching itself from the materiality and imperfections of the terrestrial nature.”356See “Evolution of Morality,” vol. ii., p. 154,et seq.357Loc. cit., p. 423.358See Tylor,op. cit., vol. ii., p. 6.359Osburn’s “Egypt and Her Testimony to the Truth,” p. 2. The God Amoun is said to address Sethos as “my beloved son, my lineal descendant.”—Ditto, p. 49.360Professor Robert Smith (op. cit., p. 17) refers to Arab tribes, called “Children of the Sun” and “Children of the Moon.”361See De Gubernatis,op. cit.,passim. He states that the stag, the bear, and some other animals represent the luminous appearances in the darkness, rather than the moon itself.362“Kamilaroi and Kurnai,” p. 169.363Op. cit., p. 43.364“The Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 10,et seq.365“L’Ordre des Primates,” p. 173 (1870).366Ibid., p. 168.367Ibid., p. 173.368Op. cit., vol. i., p. 48.369Ibid., p. 63.370Ibid., p. 70,et seq.371Ibid., p. 105.372Ibid., p. 56.373“Generelle Morphologie der Organismen,” vol. ii., p. 430 (1866).374Op. cit., vol. i., p. 145.375“Natural Selection,” p. 343 (1870).376Op. cit., vol. i., p. 56.377Darwin,op. cit., vol. i., p. 141.378See Owen’s “Anatomy of the Vertebrates,” vol. iii., p. 186.379Op. cit., vol. ii., p. 376.380The “Academy,” No. 20, p. 183 (1871).381“Revue des Cours Scientifiques,” 30th July, 1870, p. 558.382“Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 152.383“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 447, n.384“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 430.385“Lay Sermons,” p. 326.386“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 446.387Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 808.388“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 489.389Ibid., p. 500.390“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 404.391Ibid., p. 444.392“Habit and Intelligence,” vol. i., p. 348 (1869).393Ibid., vol. i., p. 295.394Ibid., vol. ii., p. 8.395Ibid., vol. i., p. 331.396Op. cit., p. 360.397Op. cit., p. 359.398Ibid., p. 368.399Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 795.400Ibid., p. 789.401“Rapport sur les Progrès de l’Anthropologie,” p. 247 (1867).402Ibid.403“Mémoire sur les Microcéphales,” p. 197.404Ibid., p. 81.
332“Origine de tous les Cultes,” t. i., p. 77.
332“Origine de tous les Cultes,” t. i., p. 77.
333Fortnightly Review, vol. vi., n. s., p. 563.
333Fortnightly Review, vol. vi., n. s., p. 563.
334DupuisOp. cit., t. iii., “De la Sphere,” p. 19.
334DupuisOp. cit., t. iii., “De la Sphere,” p. 19.
335“Custom and Myth,” 2nd edition, p. 262.
335“Custom and Myth,” 2nd edition, p. 262.
336As to supposed use of the totem as a tattoo mark, see M’Lennan,loc. cit., p. 418, and Smith’s “Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia,” p. 213,et seq.
336As to supposed use of the totem as a tattoo mark, see M’Lennan,loc. cit., p. 418, and Smith’s “Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia,” p. 213,et seq.
337“Origin of Civilisation,” 3rd edition, p. 199.
337“Origin of Civilisation,” 3rd edition, p. 199.
338Ditto, p. 327.
338Ditto, p. 327.
339Ditto, p. 253.
339Ditto, p. 253.
340“Primitive Culture,” vol. ii., p. 215.
340“Primitive Culture,” vol. ii., p. 215.
341Loc. cit., p. 422.
341Loc. cit., p. 422.
342Dupuis “Abrégé de l’Origine,” pp. 71, 83.
342Dupuis “Abrégé de l’Origine,” pp. 71, 83.
343Ditto, p. 66.
343Ditto, p. 66.
344English edition, p. 250.
344English edition, p. 250.
345Ditto, p. 145.
345Ditto, p. 145.
346Ditto, p. 255.
346Ditto, p. 255.
347Op. cit., p. 167,et seq.
347Op. cit., p. 167,et seq.
348“American Hero-Myths,” p. 65.
348“American Hero-Myths,” p. 65.
349“Les Mœurs des Sauvages,” t. i., 465.
349“Les Mœurs des Sauvages,” t. i., 465.
350See Gubernatis’ “Zoological Mythology,”passim. Dr. Brinton shows that the Great Rabbit of Algonkin Mythology is the Light God.—Op. cit., p. 47.
350See Gubernatis’ “Zoological Mythology,”passim. Dr. Brinton shows that the Great Rabbit of Algonkin Mythology is the Light God.—Op. cit., p. 47.
351“Chaldean Magic,” p. 228.
351“Chaldean Magic,” p. 228.
352Ditto, p. 231.
352Ditto, p. 231.
353Fortnightly Review, vol. vii., n. s., p. 212.
353Fortnightly Review, vol. vii., n. s., p. 212.
354Op. cit., p. 199.
354Op. cit., p. 199.
355This idea survives in the personal patron saints of the Greek Church. The special god was of a peculiar character, “partaking of the imperfections and foibles of human nature,” and, like the Mazdianfravishi, it was part of the man’s soul. Lenormant says, however, that in the Mazdian books, “the conception rose to a higher degree, detaching itself from the materiality and imperfections of the terrestrial nature.”
355This idea survives in the personal patron saints of the Greek Church. The special god was of a peculiar character, “partaking of the imperfections and foibles of human nature,” and, like the Mazdianfravishi, it was part of the man’s soul. Lenormant says, however, that in the Mazdian books, “the conception rose to a higher degree, detaching itself from the materiality and imperfections of the terrestrial nature.”
356See “Evolution of Morality,” vol. ii., p. 154,et seq.
356See “Evolution of Morality,” vol. ii., p. 154,et seq.
357Loc. cit., p. 423.
357Loc. cit., p. 423.
358See Tylor,op. cit., vol. ii., p. 6.
358See Tylor,op. cit., vol. ii., p. 6.
359Osburn’s “Egypt and Her Testimony to the Truth,” p. 2. The God Amoun is said to address Sethos as “my beloved son, my lineal descendant.”—Ditto, p. 49.
359Osburn’s “Egypt and Her Testimony to the Truth,” p. 2. The God Amoun is said to address Sethos as “my beloved son, my lineal descendant.”—Ditto, p. 49.
360Professor Robert Smith (op. cit., p. 17) refers to Arab tribes, called “Children of the Sun” and “Children of the Moon.”
360Professor Robert Smith (op. cit., p. 17) refers to Arab tribes, called “Children of the Sun” and “Children of the Moon.”
361See De Gubernatis,op. cit.,passim. He states that the stag, the bear, and some other animals represent the luminous appearances in the darkness, rather than the moon itself.
361See De Gubernatis,op. cit.,passim. He states that the stag, the bear, and some other animals represent the luminous appearances in the darkness, rather than the moon itself.
362“Kamilaroi and Kurnai,” p. 169.
362“Kamilaroi and Kurnai,” p. 169.
363Op. cit., p. 43.
363Op. cit., p. 43.
364“The Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 10,et seq.
364“The Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 10,et seq.
365“L’Ordre des Primates,” p. 173 (1870).
365“L’Ordre des Primates,” p. 173 (1870).
366Ibid., p. 168.
366Ibid., p. 168.
367Ibid., p. 173.
367Ibid., p. 173.
368Op. cit., vol. i., p. 48.
368Op. cit., vol. i., p. 48.
369Ibid., p. 63.
369Ibid., p. 63.
370Ibid., p. 70,et seq.
370Ibid., p. 70,et seq.
371Ibid., p. 105.
371Ibid., p. 105.
372Ibid., p. 56.
372Ibid., p. 56.
373“Generelle Morphologie der Organismen,” vol. ii., p. 430 (1866).
373“Generelle Morphologie der Organismen,” vol. ii., p. 430 (1866).
374Op. cit., vol. i., p. 145.
374Op. cit., vol. i., p. 145.
375“Natural Selection,” p. 343 (1870).
375“Natural Selection,” p. 343 (1870).
376Op. cit., vol. i., p. 56.
376Op. cit., vol. i., p. 56.
377Darwin,op. cit., vol. i., p. 141.
377Darwin,op. cit., vol. i., p. 141.
378See Owen’s “Anatomy of the Vertebrates,” vol. iii., p. 186.
378See Owen’s “Anatomy of the Vertebrates,” vol. iii., p. 186.
379Op. cit., vol. ii., p. 376.
379Op. cit., vol. ii., p. 376.
380The “Academy,” No. 20, p. 183 (1871).
380The “Academy,” No. 20, p. 183 (1871).
381“Revue des Cours Scientifiques,” 30th July, 1870, p. 558.
381“Revue des Cours Scientifiques,” 30th July, 1870, p. 558.
382“Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 152.
382“Descent of Man,” vol. i., p. 152.
383“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 447, n.
383“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 447, n.
384“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 430.
384“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 430.
385“Lay Sermons,” p. 326.
385“Lay Sermons,” p. 326.
386“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 446.
386“Principles of Biology,” vol. i., p. 446.
387Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 808.
387Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 808.
388“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 489.
388“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 489.
389Ibid., p. 500.
389Ibid., p. 500.
390“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 404.
390“First Principles,” 2nd edition, p. 404.
391Ibid., p. 444.
391Ibid., p. 444.
392“Habit and Intelligence,” vol. i., p. 348 (1869).
392“Habit and Intelligence,” vol. i., p. 348 (1869).
393Ibid., vol. i., p. 295.
393Ibid., vol. i., p. 295.
394Ibid., vol. ii., p. 8.
394Ibid., vol. ii., p. 8.
395Ibid., vol. i., p. 331.
395Ibid., vol. i., p. 331.
396Op. cit., p. 360.
396Op. cit., p. 360.
397Op. cit., p. 359.
397Op. cit., p. 359.
398Ibid., p. 368.
398Ibid., p. 368.
399Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 795.
399Op. cit., vol. iii., p. 795.
400Ibid., p. 789.
400Ibid., p. 789.
401“Rapport sur les Progrès de l’Anthropologie,” p. 247 (1867).
401“Rapport sur les Progrès de l’Anthropologie,” p. 247 (1867).
402Ibid.
402Ibid.
403“Mémoire sur les Microcéphales,” p. 197.
403“Mémoire sur les Microcéphales,” p. 197.
404Ibid., p. 81.
404Ibid., p. 81.