V.

I thank my God for my humility!freedom from prejudice.Of a kindred nature is his perfect frankness and fairness to his victims: villainy never clouds his judgment. Iago, astutest of intriguers, was deceived, as has been already noted, by his own morbid acuteness, and firmly believedâ€”what the simplest spectator can see to be a delusionâ€”that Othello has tampered with his wife. Richard, on the contrary, is a marvel of judicial impartiality; he speaks of King Edward in such terms as theseâ€”i.i. 36.If King Edward be as true and justAs I am subtle, false and treacherous;and weighs elaborately the superior merit of one of his victims to his own:i.ii. from 240.Hath she forgot already that brave prince,Edward, her lord, whom I, some three months since,Stabb'd in my angry mood at Tewksbury?A sweeter and a lovelier gentleman,Framed in the prodigality of nature,Young, valiant, wise, and, no doubt, right royal,The spacious world cannot again afford:And will she yet debase her eyes on me,That cropped the golden prime of this sweet prince,And made her widow to a woful bed?On me, whose all not equals Edward's moiety?Richard can rise to all his height of villainy without its leaving on himself the slightest trace of struggle or even effort.A recklessness suggesting boundless resources.Again, the idea of boundless resource is suggested by an occasional recklessness, almost a slovenliness, in the details of his intrigues. Thus, in the early part of the WooingScene he makes two blunders of which a tyro in intrigue might be ashamed.i.ii. 91.He denies that he is the author of Edward's death, to be instantly confronted with the evidence of Margaret as an eye-witness. Then a few lines further on he goes to the opposite extreme:i.ii. 101.Anne.Didst thou not kill this king?Glouc.I grant ye.Anne. Dost grant me, hedgehog?The merest beginner would know better how to meet accusations than by such haphazard denials and acknowledgments. But the crack billiard-player will indulge at the beginning of the game in a little clumsiness, giving his adversaries a prospect of victory only to have the pleasure of making up the disadvantage with one or two brilliant strokes. And so Richard, essaying the most difficult problem ever attempted in human intercourse, lets half the interview pass before he feels it worth while to play with caution.General character of Richard's intrigue: inspiration rather than calculation.The mysterious irresistibility of Richard, pointed to by the succession of incidents in the play, is assisted by the very improbability of some of the more difficult scenes in which he is an actor. Intrigue in general is a thing of reason, and its probabilities can be readily analysed; but the genius of intrigue in Richard seems to make him avoid the caution of other intriguers, and to give him a preference for feats which seem impossible. The whole suggests how it is not by calculation that he works, but he brings thetouchof an artist to his dealing with human weakness, and follows whither his artist's inspiration leads him. If, then, there is nothing so remote from evil but Richard can make it tributary; if he can endow crimes with power of self-multiplying; if he can pass through a career of sin without the taint of distortion on his intellect and with the unruffled calmness of innocence; if Richard accomplishes feats no other would attempt with a carelessness no other reputation would risk, even slow reason may well believe him irresistible. When,further, such qualifications for villainy become, by unbroken success in villainy, reflected in Richard's very bearing; when the only law explaining his motions to onlookers is the lawlessness of genius whose instinct is more unerring than the most laborious calculation and planning, it becomes only natural that theopinionof his irresistibility should become converted into a mysticfascination, making Richard's very presence a signal to his adversaries of defeat, chilling with hopelessness the energies with which they are to face his consummate skill.The two main ideas of Shakespeare's portrait, the idea of an artist in crime and the fascination of invincibility which Richard bears about with him, are strikingly illustrated in the wooing of Lady Anne.i.ii.For a long time Richard will not put forth effort, but meets the loathing and execration hurled at him with repartee, saying in so many words that he regards the scene as a 'keen encounter of our wits.'115.All this time the mysterious power of his presence is operating, the more strongly as Lady Anne sees the most unanswerable cause that denunciation ever had to put produce no effect upon her adversary, and feels her own confidence in her wrongs recoiling upon herself.from 152.When the spell has had time to work then he assumes a serious tone: suddenly, as we have seen, turning the strong point of Anne's attack, his own inhuman nature, into the basis of his pleaâ€”he who never wept before has been softened by love to her. From this point he urges his cause with breathless speed;175.he presses a sword into her hand with which to pierce his breast, knowing that she lacks the nerve to wield it, and seeing how such forbearance on her part will be a starting-point in giving way.from 193.We can trace the sinking of her will before the unconquerable will of her adversary in her feebler and feebler refusals, while as yet very shame keeps her to an outward defiance. Then, when she is wishing to yield, he suddenly finds her an excuse by declaring that all he desires at thismoment is that she should leave the care of the King's funeralTo him that hath more cause to be a mourner.By yielding this much to penitence and religion we see she has commenced a downward descent from which she will never recover. Such consummate art in the handling of human nature, backed by the spell of an irresistible presence, the weak Anne has no power to combat.iv.i. 66-87.To the last she is as much lost in amazement as the reader at the way it has all come about:Lo, ere I can repeat this curse again,Even in so short a space, my woman's heartGrossly grew captive to his honey words.Idealv.real villainyTo gather up our results. A dramatist is to paint a portrait of ideal villainy as distinct from villainy in real life. In real life it is a commonplace that a virtuous life is a life of effort; but the converse is not true, that he who is prepared to be a villain will therefore lead an easy life. On the contrary, 'thewayof transgressors is hard.' The metaphor suggests a path, laid down at first by the Architect of the universe, beaten plain and flat by the generations of men who have since trodden it: he who keeps within this path of rectitude will walk, not without effort, yet at least with safety; but he who 'steps aside' to the right or left will find his way beset with pitfalls and stumblingblocks. In real life a man sets out to be a villain, but his mental power is deficient, and he remains a villain only in intention. Or he has stores of power, but lacks the spark of purpose to set them aflame. Or, armed with both will to plan and mind to execute, yet his efforts are hampered by unfit tools. Or, if his purpose needs reliance alone on his own clear head and his own strong arm, yet in the critical moment the emotional nature he has inherited with his humanity starts into rebellion and scares him, like Macbeth, from the half-accomplisheddeed. Or, if he is as hardened in nature as corrupt in mind and will, yet he is closely pursued by a mocking fate, which crowns his well-laid plans with a mysterious succession of failures. Or, if there is no other limitation on him from within or from without, yet he may move in a world too narrow to give him scope: the man with a heart to be the scourge of his country proves in fact no more than the vagabond of a country side.â€”But in Shakespeare's portrait we have infinite capacity for mischief, needing no purpose, for evil has become to it an end in itself; we have one who for tools can use the baseness of his own nature or the shame of those who are his nearest kin, while at his touch all that is holiest becomes transformed into weapons of iniquity. We have one whose nature in the past has been a gleaning ground for evil in every stage of his development, and who in the present is framed to look on unnatural horror with the eyes of interested curiosity. We have one who seems to be seconded by fate with a series of successes, which builds up for him an irresistibility that is his strongest safeguard; and who, instead of being cramped by circumstances, has for his stage the world of history itself, in which crowns are the prize and nations the victims. In such a portrait is any element wanting to arrive at the ideal of villainy?Ideal villainyv.monstrosity.The question would rather be whether Shakespeare has not gone too far, and, passing outside the limits of art, exhibited a monstrosity. Nor is it an answer to point to the 'dramatic hedging' by which Richard is endowed with undaunted personal courage, unlimited intellectual power, and every good quality not inconsistent with his perfect villainy. The objection to such a portrait as the present study presents is that it offends against our sense of the principles upon which the universe has been constructed; we feel that before a violation of nature could attain such proportions nature must have exerted her recuperative force to crush it. If, however,the dramatist can suggest that such reassertion of nature is actually made, that the crushing blow is delayed only while it is accumulating force: in a word, if the dramatist can draw out before us aNemesisas ideal as the villainy was ideal, then the full demands of art will be satisfied. The Nemesis that dominates the whole play ofRichard IIIwill be the subject of the next study.V.Richard III: How Shakespeare weaves Nemesis into History.A Study in Plot.Richard III: from the Character side a violation of Nemesis;Ihavealluded already to the dangerous tendency, which, as it appears to me, exists amongst ordinary readers of Shakespeare, to ignore plot as of secondary importance, and to look for Shakespeare's greatness mainly in his conceptions of character. But the full character effect of a dramatic portrait cannot be grasped if it be dissociated from the plot; and this is nowhere more powerfully illustrated than in the play ofRichard III. The last study was devoted exclusively to the Character side of the play, and on this confined view the portrait of Richard seemed a huge offence against our sense of moral equilibrium, rendering artistic satisfaction impossible. Such an impression vanishes when, as in the present study, the drama is looked at from the side of Plot.from the side of Plot, the transformation of history into Nemesis.The effect of this plot is, however, missed by those who limit their attention in reviewing it to Richard himself. These may feel that there is nothing in his fate to compensate for the spectacle of his crimes: man must die, and a death in fulness of energy amid the glorious stir of battle may seem a fate to be envied. But the Shakespearean Drama with its complexity of plot is not limited to the individual life and fate in its interpretation of history; and when we survey all the distinct trains of interest in the play ofRichard III, with their blendings and mutual influence, we shall obtain a sense of dramatic satisfactionamply counterbalancing the monstrosity of Richard's villainy. Viewed as a study in character the play leaves in us only an intense craving for Nemesis: when we turn to consider the plot, this presents to us the world of history transformed into an intricate design of which the recurrent pattern is Nemesis.The underplot: a set of separate Nemesis Actions.This notion of tracing a pattern in human affairs is a convenient key to the exposition of plot. Laying aside for the present the main interest of Richard himself, we may observe that the bulk of the drama consists in a number of minor interestsâ€”single threads of the patternâ€”each of which is a separate example of Nemesis.Clarence.The first of these trains of interest centres around the Duke of Clarence. He has betrayed the Lancastrians, to whom he had solemnly sworn fealty, for the sake of the house of York;i.iv. 50, 66.this perjury is his bitterest recollection in his hour of awakened conscience, and is urged home by the taunts of his murderers; while his only defence is that he did it all for his brother's love.ii.i. 86.Yet his lot is to fall by a treacherous death, the warrant for which is signed by this brother, the King and head of the Yorkist house,i.iv. 250.while its execution is procured by the bulwark of the house, the intriguing Richard.The King.The centre of the second nemesis is the King, who has thus allowed himself in a moment of suspicion to be made a tool for the murder of his brother, seeking to stop it when too late.ii.i. 77-133.Shakespeare has contrived that this death of Clarence, announced as it is in so terrible a manner beside the King's sick bed, gives him a shock from which he never rallies, and he is carried out to die with the words on his lips:O God, I fear Thy justice will take holdOn me, and you, and mine, and yours for this.The Queen and her kindred.In this nemesis on the King are associated the Queen and her kindred. They have been assenting parties to the measures against Clarence (however little they may have contemplated the bloody issue to which those measures havebeen brought by the intrigues of Gloster).ii.ii. 62-65.This we must understand from the introduction of Clarence's children, who serve no purpose except to taunt the Queen in her bereavement:Boy.Good aunt, you wept not for our father's death;How can we aid you with our kindred tears?Girl.Our fatherless distress was left unmoan'd;Your widow-dolour likewise be unwept!ii.ii. 74, &c.The death of the King, so unexpectedly linked to that of Clarence, removes from the Queen and her kindred the sole bulwark to the hated Woodville family, and leaves them at the mercy of their enemies.Hastings.A third nemesis Action has Hastings for its subject.i.i. 66;iii.ii. 58, &c.Hastings is the head of the court-faction which is opposed to the Queen and her allies, and he passes all bounds of decency in his exultation at the fate which overwhelms his adversaries:But I shall laugh at this a twelvemonth hence,That they who brought me in my master's hate,I live to look upon their tragedy.He even forgets his dignity as a nobleman, and stops on his way to the Tower to chat with a mere officer of the court,iii.ii. 97.in order to tell him the news of which he is full, that his enemies are to die that day at Pomfret. Yet this very journey of Hastings is his journey to the block; the same cruel fate which had descended upon his opponents, from the same agent and by the same unscrupulous doom, is dealt out to Hastings in his turn.Buckingham.In this treacherous casting off of Hastings when he is no longer useful, Buckingham has been a prime agent.iii.ii, from 114.Buckingham amused himself with the false security of Hastings, adding to Hastings's innocent expression of his intention to stay dinner at the Tower the asideAnd supper too, although thou know'st it not;while in the details of the judicial murder he plays second to Richard. By precisely similar treachery he is himself castoff when he hesitates to go further with Richard's villainous schemes;iv.ii, from 86.and in precisely similar manner the treachery is flavoured with contempt.Buck.I am thus bold to put your grace in mindOf what you promised me.K. Rich.Well, but what's o'clock?Buck.Upon the stroke of ten.K. Rich.Well, let it strike.Buck.Why let it strike?K. Rich.Because that, like a Jack, thou keep'st the strokeBetwixt thy begging and my meditation.I am not in the giving vein to-day.Buck.Why, then resolve me whether you will or no.K. Rich.Tut, tut.Thou troublest me; I am not in the vein.[Exeunt all but Buckingham.Buck.Is it even so? rewards he my true serviceWith such deep contempt? made I him king for this?O, let me think on Hastings, and be goneTo Brecknock, while my fearful head is on!The four nemeses formed into a system by nemesis as a link.These four Nemesis Actions, it will be observed, are not separate trains of incident going on side by side, they are linked together into a system, the law of which is seen to be that those who triumph in one nemesis become the victims of the next; so that the whole suggests a 'chain of destruction,' like that binding together the orders of the brute creation which live by preying upon one another. When Clarence perished it was the King who dealt the doom and the Queen's party who triumphed: the wheel of Nemesis goes round and the King's death follows the death of his victim, the Queen's kindred are naked to the vengeance of their enemies, and Hastings is left to exult. Again the wheel of Nemesis revolves, and Hastings at the moment of his highest exultation is hurled to destruction, while Buckingham stands by to point the moral with a gibe. Once more the wheel goes round, and Buckingham hears similar gibes addressed to himself and points the same moral in his own person. Thus the portion of the drama we have so far consideredyields us a pattern within a pattern, a series of Nemesis Actions woven into a complete underplot by a connecting-link which is also Nemesis.The 'Enveloping Action' a nemesis.Following out the same general idea we may proceed to notice how the dramatic pattern is surrounded by a fringe or border. The picture of life presented in a play will have the more reality if it be connected with a life wider than its own. There is no social sphere, however private, but is to some extent affected by a wider life outside it, this by one wider still, until the great world is reached the story of which is History. The immediate interest may be in a single family, but it will be a great war which, perhaps, takes away some member of this family to die in battle, or some great commercial crisis which brings mutation of fortune to the obscure home. The artists of fiction are solicitous thus to suggest connections between lesser and greater; it is the natural tendency of the mind to pass from the known to the unknown, and if the artist can derive the movements in his little world from the great world outside, he appears to have given his fiction a basis of admitted truth to rest on. This device of enclosing the incidents of the actual story in a framework of great eventsâ€”technically, the 'Enveloping Action'â€”is one which is common in Shakespeare; it is enough to instance such a case asA Midsummer Night's Dream, in which play a fairy story has a measure of historic reality given to it by its connection with the marriage of personages so famous as Theseus and Hippolyta. In the present case, the main incidents and personages belong to public life; nevertheless the effect in question is still secured, and the contest of factions with which the play is occupied is represented as making up only a few incidents in the great feud of Lancaster and York. This Enveloping Action of the whole play, the War of the Roses, is marked with special clearness: two personages are introduced for the sole purpose of giving it prominence.ii.ii. 80.The Duchess of York is by her years andposition the representative of the whole house; the factions who in the play successively triumph and fall are all descended from herself; she says:Alas, I am the mother of these moans!Their woes are parcell'd, mine are general.i.iii, from 111; andiv.iv. 1-125.And probabilities are forced to bring in Queen Margaret, the head and sole rallying-point of the ruined Lancastrians: when the two aged women are confronted the whole civil war is epitomised. It is hardly necessary to point out that this Enveloping Action is itself a Nemesis Action. All the rising and falling, the suffering and retaliation that we actually see going on between the different sections of the Yorkist house, constitute a detail in a wider retribution:esp.ii.ii;iv.i;iv.iv.the presence of the Duchess gives to the incidents a unity,ii.iii; andiv.iv.Queen Margaret's function is to point out that this unity of woe is only the nemesis falling on the house of York for their wrongs to the house of Lancaster. Thus the pattern made up of so many reiterations of nemesis is enclosed in a border which itself repeats the same figure.The Enveloping Nemesis carried on into indefiniteness.The effect is carried further. Generally the Enveloping Action is a sort of curtain by which our view of a drama is bounded; in the present case the curtain is at one point lifted, and we get a glimpse into the world beyond. Queen Margaret has surprised the Yorkist courtiers, and her prophetic denunciations are still ringing, in which she points to the calamities her foes have begun to suffer as retribution for the woes of which her fallen greatness is the representativeâ€”i.iii. 174-194.when Gloster suddenly turns the tables upon her.The curse my noble father laid on thee,When thou didst crown his warlike brows with paperAnd with thy scorns drew'st rivers from his eyes,And then, to dry them, gavest the duke a cloutSteep'd in the faultless blood of pretty Rutland,â€”His curses, then from bitterness of soulDenounced against thee, are all fall'n upon thee;And God, not we, hath plagu'd thy bloody deed.And the new key-note struck by Gloster is taken up in chorus by the rest, who find relief from the crushing effect of Margaret's curses by pressing the charge home upon her. This is only a detail, but it is enough to carry the effect of the Enveloping Action a degree further back in time: the events of the play are nemesis on York for wrongs done to Lancaster, but now, it seems, these old wrongs against Lancaster were retribution for yet older crimes Lancaster had committed against York. As in architecture the vista is contrived so as to carry the general design of the building into indefiniteness, so here, while the grand nemesis, of which Margaret's presence is the representative, shuts in the play like a veil, the momentary lifting of the veil opens up a vista of nemeses receding further and further back into history.The one attempt to reverse the nemesis confirms it.Once more. All that we have seen suggests it as a sort of law to the feud of York and Lancaster that each is destined to wreak vengeance on the other, and then itself suffer in turn.i.ii.But at one notable point of the play an attempt is made to evade the hereditary nemesis by the marriage of Richard and Lady Anne. Anne, daughter to Warwickâ€”the grand deserter to the Lancastrians and martyr to their causeâ€”widow to the murdered heir of the house and chief mourner to its murdered head, is surely the greatest sufferer of the Lancastrians at the hands of the Yorkists. Richard is certainly the chief avenger of York upon Lancaster. When the chief source of vengeance and the chief sufferer are united in the closest of all bonds, the attempt to evade Nemesis becomes ideal. Yet what is the consequence? This attempt of Lady Anne to evade the hereditary curse proves the very channel by which the curse descends upon herself.iv.i. 66-87.We see her once more: she is then on her way to the Tower, and we hear her tell the strange story of her wooing, and wish the crown were 'red hot steel to sear her to the brain'; never, she says, since her unionwith Richard has she enjoyed the golden dew of sleep; she is but waiting for the destruction, by which, no doubt, Richard will shortly rid himself of her.To counteract the effect of repetition the nemeses are specially emphasised:An objection may, however, here present itself, that continual repetition of an idea like Nemesis, tends to weaken its artistic effect, until it comes to be taken for granted. No doubt it is a law of taste that force may be dissipated by repetition if carried beyond a certain point. But it is to be noted, on the other hand, what pains Shakespeare has taken to counteract the tendency in the present instance. The force of a nemesis may depend upon a fitness that addresses itself to the spectator's reflection, or it may be measured by the degree to which the nemesis is brought into prominence in the incidents themselves.by recognition,In the incidents of the present play special means are adopted to make the recognition of the successive nemeses as they arise emphatic. In the first place the nemesis is in each case pointed out at the moment of its fulfilment.i.iv, from 18.In the case of Clarence his story of crime and retribution is reflected in his dream before it is brought to a conclusion in reality; and wherein the bitterness of this review consists, we see when he turns to his sympathising jailor and says:i.iv. 66.O Brackenbury, I have done those things,Which now bear evidence against my soul,For Edward's sake: and see how he requites me!The words have already been quoted in which the King recognises how God's justice has overtaken him for his part in Clarence's death, and those in which the children of Clarence taunt the Queen with her having herself to bear the bereavement she has made them suffer. As the Queen's kindred are being led to their death, one of them exclaims:iii.iii. 15.Now Margaret's curse is fall'n upon our headsFor standing by when Richard stabb'd her son.Hastings, when his doom has wakened him from his infatuation, recollects a priest he had met on his way to theTower, with whom he had stopped to talk about the discomfiture of his enemies:iii.iv. 89.O, now I want the priest that spake to me!Buckingham on his way to the scaffold apostrophises the souls of his victims:v.i. 7.If that your moody discontented soulsDo through the clouds behold this present hour,Even for revenge mock my destruction.iv.iv. 1, 35.And such individual notes of recognition are collected into a sort of chorus when Margaret appears the second time to point out the fulfilment of her curses, and sits down beside the old Duchess and her daughter-in-law to join in the 'society of sorrow' and 'cloy her' with beholding the revenge for which she has hungered.by prophecy,Again, the nemeses have a further emphasis given to them by prophecy.i.iii, from 195.As Queen Margaret's second appearance is to mark the fulfilment of a general retribution, so her first appearance denounced it beforehand in the form of curses. And the effect is carried on in individual prophecies: the Queen's friends as they suffer foresee that the turn of the opposite party will come:iii.iii. 7.You live that shall cry woe for this hereafter;and Hastings prophesies Buckingham's doom:iii.iv. 109.They smile at me that shortly shall be dead.It is as if the atmosphere cleared for each sufferer with the approach of death, and they then saw clearly the righteous plan on which the universe is constructed, and which had been hidden from them by the dust of life.and especially by irony.But there is a third means, more powerful than either recognition or prophecy, which Shakespeare has employed to make his Nemesis Actions emphatic. The danger of an effect becoming tame by repetition he has met by giving to each train of nemesis a flash of irony at some point of its course. In the case of Lady Anne we have already seen how the exact channel Nemesis chooses by which to descend uponher is the attempt she made to avert it. She had bitterly cursed her husband's murderer:iv.i. 75.And be thy wifeâ€”if any be so madâ€”As miserable by the life of theeAs thou hast made me by my dear lord's death!In spite of this she had yielded to Richard's mysterious power, and so, as she feels, proved thesubject of her own heart's curse. Again, it was noticed in the preceding study how the Queen, less hard than the rest in that wicked court, or perhaps softened by the spectacle of her dying husband, essayed to reverse, when too late, what had been done against Clarence;ii.i. 134.Gloster skilfully turned this compunction of conscience into a ground of suspicion on which he traded to bring all the Queen's friends to the block, and thus a moment's relenting was made into a means of destruction.i.iv. 187, 199, 200, 206.In Clarence's struggle for life, as one after another the threads of hope snap, as the appeal to law is met by the King's command, the appeal to heavenly law by the reminder of his own sin,i.iv. 232.he comes to rest for his last and surest hope upon his powerful brother Glosterâ€”and the very murderers catch the irony of the scene:Clar.If you be hired for meed, go back again,And I will send you to my brother Gloster,Who shall reward you better for my lifeThan Edward will for tidings of my death.Sec. Murd.You are deceived, your brother Gloster hates you.Clar.O, no, he loves me, and he holds me dear:Go you to him from me.Both.Ay, so we will.Clar.Tell him, when that our princely father YorkBless'd his three sons with his victorious arm,And charg'd us from his soul to love each other,He little thought of this divided friendship:Bid Gloster think of this, and he will weep.First Murd.Ay, millstones; as he lesson'd us to weep.Clar.O, do not slander him, for he is kind.First Murd.Right,As snow in harvest. Thou deceivest thyself:'Tis he that sent us hither now to slaughter thee.Clar.It cannot be; for when I parted with him,He hugg'd me in his arms, and swore, with sobs,That he would labour my delivery.Sec. Murd.Why, so he doth, now he delivers theeFrom this world's thraldom to the joys of heaven.ii.i. 95.In the King's case a special incident is introduced into the scene to point the irony. Before Edward can well realise the terrible announcement of Clarence's death, the decorum of the royal chamber is interrupted by Derby, who bursts in, anxious not to lose the portion of the king's life that yet remains, in order to beg a pardon for his follower. The King feels the shock of contrast:Have I a tongue to doom my brother's death,And shall the same give pardon to a slave?The prerogative of mercy that exists in so extreme a case as the murder of a 'righteous gentleman,' and is so passionately sought by Derby for a servant, is denied to the King himself for the deliverance of his innocent brother.iii.ii, from 41.The nemesis on Hastings is saturated with irony; he has the simplest reliance on Richard and on 'his servant Catesby,' who has come to him as the agent of Richard's treachery; and the very words of the scene have a double significance that all see but Hastings himself.Hast.I tell thee, Catesby,â€”Cate.What, my lord?Hast.Ere a fortnight make me elderI'll send some packing that yet think not on it.Cate.'Tis a vile thing to die, my gracious lord,When men are unprepared, and look not for it.Hast.O monstrous, monstrous! and so falls it outWith Rivers, Vaughan, Grey: and so 'twill doWith some men else, who think themselves as safeAs thou and I.As the scenes with Margaret constituted a general summary of the individual prophecies and recognitions,ii.i.so the Reconciliation Scene around the King's dying bed may be said to gather into a sort of summary the irony distributed throughthe play; for the effect of the incident is that the different parties pray for their own destruction.ii.i. 32.In this scene Buckingham has taken the lead and struck the most solemn notes in his pledge of amity;v.i, from 10.when Buckingham comes to die, his bitterest thought seems to be that the day of his death is All Souls' Day.This is the daythat, in King Edward's time,I wish'd might fall on me, when I was foundFalse to his children or his wife's allies;This is the day wherein I wish'd to fallBy the false faith of him I trusted most; ...That high All-Seer that I dallied withHath turn'd my feigned prayer on my headAnd given in earnest what I begg'd in jest.By devices, then, such as these; by the sudden revelation of a remedy when it is just too late to use it; by the sudden memory of clear warnings blindly missed; by the spectacle of a leaning for hope upon that which is known to be ground for despair; by attempts to retreat or turn aside proving short cuts to destruction; above all by the sufferer's perception that he himself has had a chief share in bringing about his doom:â€”by such irony the monotony of Nemesis is relieved, and fatality becomes flavoured with mockery.This multiplication of Nemesis a dramatic background for the villainy of Richard.Dramatic design, like design which appeals more directly to the eye, has its perspective: to miss even by a little the point of view from which it is to be contemplated is enough to throw the whole into distortion. So readers who are not careful to watch the harmony between Character and Plot have often found in the present play nothing but wearisome repetition. Or, as there is only a step between the sublime and the ridiculous, this masterpiece of Shakespearean plot has suggested to them only the idea of Melodrama,â€”that curious product of dramatic feeling without dramatic inventiveness, with its world in which poetic justice has become prosaic, in which conspiracy is never so superhumanly secret but there comes a still more superhuman detection, and howeversuccessful villainy may be for a moment the spectator confidently relies on its being eventually disposed of by a summary 'off with his head.' The point of view thus missed in the present play is that this network of Nemesis is all needed to give dramatic reality to the colossal villainy of the principal figure. When isolated, the character of Richard is unrealisable from its offence against an innate sense of retribution. Accordingly Shakespeare projects it into a world of which, in whatever direction we look, retribution is the sole visible pattern; in which, as we are carried along by the movement of the play, the unvarying reiteration of Nemesis has the effect ofgiving rhythm to fate.The motive force of the whole play is another nemesis: the Life and Death of Richard.What the action of the play has yielded so far to our investigation has been independent of the central personage: we have now to connect Richard himself with the plot. Although the various Nemesis Actions have been carried on by their own motion and by the force of retribution as a principle of moral government, yet there is not one of them which reaches its goal without at some point of its course receiving an impetus from contact with Richard. Richard is thus the source of movement to the whole drama, communicating his own energy through all parts. It is only fitting that the motive force to this system of nemeses should be itself a grand Nemesis Action, theLife and Death, or crime and retribution,of Richard III. The hero's rise has been sufficiently treated in the preceding study; it remains to trace his fall.The fall of Richard: not a shock but a succession of stages.This fall of Richard is constructed on Shakespeare's favourite plan; its force is measured, not by suddenness and violence, but by protraction and the perception of distinct stagesâ€”the crescendo in music as distinguished from the fortissimo. Such a fall is not a mere passage through the airâ€”one shock and then all is overâ€”but a slipping down the face of the precipice, with desperate clingings and consciously increasing impetus: its effect is the one inexhaustibleemotion of suspense. If we examine the point at which the fall begins we are reminded that the nemesis on Richard is different in its type from the others in the play.Not a nemesis of equality but of sureness.These are (like that on Shylock) of theequalitytype, of which the motto is measure for measure:iii.iii. 15.and, with his usual exactness, Shakespeare gives us a turning-point in the precise centre of the play, where, as the Queen's kindred are being borne to their death, we get the first recognition that the general retribution denounced by Margaret has begun to work. But the turning-point of Richard's fate is reserved till long past the centre of the play; his is the nemesis ofsureness, in which the blow is delayed that it may accumulate force. Not that this turning-point is reserved to the very end;The turning-point: irony of its delay.the change of fortune appears just when Richard hascommitted himselfto his final crime in the usurpationâ€”the murder of the childrenâ€”the crime from which his most unscrupulous accomplice has drawn back.iv.ii, from 46.The effect of this arrangement is to make the numerous crimes which follow appear to come by necessity; he is 'so far in blood that sin will pluck on sin'; he is forced to go on heaping up his villainies with Nemesis full in his view. This turning-point appears in the simple announcement that 'Dorset has fled to Richmond.' There is an instantaneous change in Richard to an attitude of defence, which is maintained to the end. His first instinct is action: but as soon as we have heard the rapid scheme of measuresâ€”most of them crimesâ€”by which he prepares to meet his dangers, then he can give himself up to meditation;from 98.and we now begin to catch the significance of what has been announced. The name of Richmond has been just heard for the first time in this play. But as Richard meditates we learn how Henry VI prophesied that Richmond should be a king while he was but a peevish boy. Again, Richard recollects how lately, while viewing a castle in the west, the mayor, who showed him over it, mispronounced its name as 'Richmond'â€”and he hadstarted, for a bard of Ireland had told him he should not live long after he had seen Richmond. Thus the irony that has given point to all the other retributions in the play is not wanting in the chief retribution of all: Shakespeare compensates for so long keeping the grand Nemesis out of sight by thus representing Richard as gradually realising thatthe finger of Nemesis has been pointing at him all his life and he has never seen it!

I thank my God for my humility!

freedom from prejudice.

Of a kindred nature is his perfect frankness and fairness to his victims: villainy never clouds his judgment. Iago, astutest of intriguers, was deceived, as has been already noted, by his own morbid acuteness, and firmly believedâ€”what the simplest spectator can see to be a delusionâ€”that Othello has tampered with his wife. Richard, on the contrary, is a marvel of judicial impartiality; he speaks of King Edward in such terms as theseâ€”

i.i. 36.

If King Edward be as true and justAs I am subtle, false and treacherous;

If King Edward be as true and just

As I am subtle, false and treacherous;

and weighs elaborately the superior merit of one of his victims to his own:

i.ii. from 240.

Hath she forgot already that brave prince,Edward, her lord, whom I, some three months since,Stabb'd in my angry mood at Tewksbury?A sweeter and a lovelier gentleman,Framed in the prodigality of nature,Young, valiant, wise, and, no doubt, right royal,The spacious world cannot again afford:And will she yet debase her eyes on me,That cropped the golden prime of this sweet prince,And made her widow to a woful bed?On me, whose all not equals Edward's moiety?

Hath she forgot already that brave prince,

Edward, her lord, whom I, some three months since,

Stabb'd in my angry mood at Tewksbury?

A sweeter and a lovelier gentleman,

Framed in the prodigality of nature,

Young, valiant, wise, and, no doubt, right royal,

The spacious world cannot again afford:

And will she yet debase her eyes on me,

That cropped the golden prime of this sweet prince,

And made her widow to a woful bed?

On me, whose all not equals Edward's moiety?

Richard can rise to all his height of villainy without its leaving on himself the slightest trace of struggle or even effort.

A recklessness suggesting boundless resources.

Again, the idea of boundless resource is suggested by an occasional recklessness, almost a slovenliness, in the details of his intrigues. Thus, in the early part of the WooingScene he makes two blunders of which a tyro in intrigue might be ashamed.i.ii. 91.He denies that he is the author of Edward's death, to be instantly confronted with the evidence of Margaret as an eye-witness. Then a few lines further on he goes to the opposite extreme:

i.ii. 101.

Anne.Didst thou not kill this king?Glouc.I grant ye.Anne. Dost grant me, hedgehog?

Anne.Didst thou not kill this king?

Glouc.I grant ye.

Anne. Dost grant me, hedgehog?

The merest beginner would know better how to meet accusations than by such haphazard denials and acknowledgments. But the crack billiard-player will indulge at the beginning of the game in a little clumsiness, giving his adversaries a prospect of victory only to have the pleasure of making up the disadvantage with one or two brilliant strokes. And so Richard, essaying the most difficult problem ever attempted in human intercourse, lets half the interview pass before he feels it worth while to play with caution.

General character of Richard's intrigue: inspiration rather than calculation.

The mysterious irresistibility of Richard, pointed to by the succession of incidents in the play, is assisted by the very improbability of some of the more difficult scenes in which he is an actor. Intrigue in general is a thing of reason, and its probabilities can be readily analysed; but the genius of intrigue in Richard seems to make him avoid the caution of other intriguers, and to give him a preference for feats which seem impossible. The whole suggests how it is not by calculation that he works, but he brings thetouchof an artist to his dealing with human weakness, and follows whither his artist's inspiration leads him. If, then, there is nothing so remote from evil but Richard can make it tributary; if he can endow crimes with power of self-multiplying; if he can pass through a career of sin without the taint of distortion on his intellect and with the unruffled calmness of innocence; if Richard accomplishes feats no other would attempt with a carelessness no other reputation would risk, even slow reason may well believe him irresistible. When,further, such qualifications for villainy become, by unbroken success in villainy, reflected in Richard's very bearing; when the only law explaining his motions to onlookers is the lawlessness of genius whose instinct is more unerring than the most laborious calculation and planning, it becomes only natural that theopinionof his irresistibility should become converted into a mysticfascination, making Richard's very presence a signal to his adversaries of defeat, chilling with hopelessness the energies with which they are to face his consummate skill.

The two main ideas of Shakespeare's portrait, the idea of an artist in crime and the fascination of invincibility which Richard bears about with him, are strikingly illustrated in the wooing of Lady Anne.i.ii.For a long time Richard will not put forth effort, but meets the loathing and execration hurled at him with repartee, saying in so many words that he regards the scene as a 'keen encounter of our wits.'115.All this time the mysterious power of his presence is operating, the more strongly as Lady Anne sees the most unanswerable cause that denunciation ever had to put produce no effect upon her adversary, and feels her own confidence in her wrongs recoiling upon herself.from 152.When the spell has had time to work then he assumes a serious tone: suddenly, as we have seen, turning the strong point of Anne's attack, his own inhuman nature, into the basis of his pleaâ€”he who never wept before has been softened by love to her. From this point he urges his cause with breathless speed;175.he presses a sword into her hand with which to pierce his breast, knowing that she lacks the nerve to wield it, and seeing how such forbearance on her part will be a starting-point in giving way.from 193.We can trace the sinking of her will before the unconquerable will of her adversary in her feebler and feebler refusals, while as yet very shame keeps her to an outward defiance. Then, when she is wishing to yield, he suddenly finds her an excuse by declaring that all he desires at thismoment is that she should leave the care of the King's funeral

To him that hath more cause to be a mourner.

By yielding this much to penitence and religion we see she has commenced a downward descent from which she will never recover. Such consummate art in the handling of human nature, backed by the spell of an irresistible presence, the weak Anne has no power to combat.iv.i. 66-87.To the last she is as much lost in amazement as the reader at the way it has all come about:

Lo, ere I can repeat this curse again,Even in so short a space, my woman's heartGrossly grew captive to his honey words.

Lo, ere I can repeat this curse again,

Even in so short a space, my woman's heart

Grossly grew captive to his honey words.

Idealv.real villainy

To gather up our results. A dramatist is to paint a portrait of ideal villainy as distinct from villainy in real life. In real life it is a commonplace that a virtuous life is a life of effort; but the converse is not true, that he who is prepared to be a villain will therefore lead an easy life. On the contrary, 'thewayof transgressors is hard.' The metaphor suggests a path, laid down at first by the Architect of the universe, beaten plain and flat by the generations of men who have since trodden it: he who keeps within this path of rectitude will walk, not without effort, yet at least with safety; but he who 'steps aside' to the right or left will find his way beset with pitfalls and stumblingblocks. In real life a man sets out to be a villain, but his mental power is deficient, and he remains a villain only in intention. Or he has stores of power, but lacks the spark of purpose to set them aflame. Or, armed with both will to plan and mind to execute, yet his efforts are hampered by unfit tools. Or, if his purpose needs reliance alone on his own clear head and his own strong arm, yet in the critical moment the emotional nature he has inherited with his humanity starts into rebellion and scares him, like Macbeth, from the half-accomplisheddeed. Or, if he is as hardened in nature as corrupt in mind and will, yet he is closely pursued by a mocking fate, which crowns his well-laid plans with a mysterious succession of failures. Or, if there is no other limitation on him from within or from without, yet he may move in a world too narrow to give him scope: the man with a heart to be the scourge of his country proves in fact no more than the vagabond of a country side.â€”But in Shakespeare's portrait we have infinite capacity for mischief, needing no purpose, for evil has become to it an end in itself; we have one who for tools can use the baseness of his own nature or the shame of those who are his nearest kin, while at his touch all that is holiest becomes transformed into weapons of iniquity. We have one whose nature in the past has been a gleaning ground for evil in every stage of his development, and who in the present is framed to look on unnatural horror with the eyes of interested curiosity. We have one who seems to be seconded by fate with a series of successes, which builds up for him an irresistibility that is his strongest safeguard; and who, instead of being cramped by circumstances, has for his stage the world of history itself, in which crowns are the prize and nations the victims. In such a portrait is any element wanting to arrive at the ideal of villainy?

Ideal villainyv.monstrosity.

The question would rather be whether Shakespeare has not gone too far, and, passing outside the limits of art, exhibited a monstrosity. Nor is it an answer to point to the 'dramatic hedging' by which Richard is endowed with undaunted personal courage, unlimited intellectual power, and every good quality not inconsistent with his perfect villainy. The objection to such a portrait as the present study presents is that it offends against our sense of the principles upon which the universe has been constructed; we feel that before a violation of nature could attain such proportions nature must have exerted her recuperative force to crush it. If, however,the dramatist can suggest that such reassertion of nature is actually made, that the crushing blow is delayed only while it is accumulating force: in a word, if the dramatist can draw out before us aNemesisas ideal as the villainy was ideal, then the full demands of art will be satisfied. The Nemesis that dominates the whole play ofRichard IIIwill be the subject of the next study.

Richard III: How Shakespeare weaves Nemesis into History.

A Study in Plot.

Richard III: from the Character side a violation of Nemesis;

Ihavealluded already to the dangerous tendency, which, as it appears to me, exists amongst ordinary readers of Shakespeare, to ignore plot as of secondary importance, and to look for Shakespeare's greatness mainly in his conceptions of character. But the full character effect of a dramatic portrait cannot be grasped if it be dissociated from the plot; and this is nowhere more powerfully illustrated than in the play ofRichard III. The last study was devoted exclusively to the Character side of the play, and on this confined view the portrait of Richard seemed a huge offence against our sense of moral equilibrium, rendering artistic satisfaction impossible. Such an impression vanishes when, as in the present study, the drama is looked at from the side of Plot.from the side of Plot, the transformation of history into Nemesis.The effect of this plot is, however, missed by those who limit their attention in reviewing it to Richard himself. These may feel that there is nothing in his fate to compensate for the spectacle of his crimes: man must die, and a death in fulness of energy amid the glorious stir of battle may seem a fate to be envied. But the Shakespearean Drama with its complexity of plot is not limited to the individual life and fate in its interpretation of history; and when we survey all the distinct trains of interest in the play ofRichard III, with their blendings and mutual influence, we shall obtain a sense of dramatic satisfactionamply counterbalancing the monstrosity of Richard's villainy. Viewed as a study in character the play leaves in us only an intense craving for Nemesis: when we turn to consider the plot, this presents to us the world of history transformed into an intricate design of which the recurrent pattern is Nemesis.

The underplot: a set of separate Nemesis Actions.

This notion of tracing a pattern in human affairs is a convenient key to the exposition of plot. Laying aside for the present the main interest of Richard himself, we may observe that the bulk of the drama consists in a number of minor interestsâ€”single threads of the patternâ€”each of which is a separate example of Nemesis.Clarence.The first of these trains of interest centres around the Duke of Clarence. He has betrayed the Lancastrians, to whom he had solemnly sworn fealty, for the sake of the house of York;i.iv. 50, 66.this perjury is his bitterest recollection in his hour of awakened conscience, and is urged home by the taunts of his murderers; while his only defence is that he did it all for his brother's love.ii.i. 86.Yet his lot is to fall by a treacherous death, the warrant for which is signed by this brother, the King and head of the Yorkist house,i.iv. 250.while its execution is procured by the bulwark of the house, the intriguing Richard.The King.The centre of the second nemesis is the King, who has thus allowed himself in a moment of suspicion to be made a tool for the murder of his brother, seeking to stop it when too late.ii.i. 77-133.Shakespeare has contrived that this death of Clarence, announced as it is in so terrible a manner beside the King's sick bed, gives him a shock from which he never rallies, and he is carried out to die with the words on his lips:

O God, I fear Thy justice will take holdOn me, and you, and mine, and yours for this.

O God, I fear Thy justice will take hold

On me, and you, and mine, and yours for this.

The Queen and her kindred.

In this nemesis on the King are associated the Queen and her kindred. They have been assenting parties to the measures against Clarence (however little they may have contemplated the bloody issue to which those measures havebeen brought by the intrigues of Gloster).ii.ii. 62-65.This we must understand from the introduction of Clarence's children, who serve no purpose except to taunt the Queen in her bereavement:

Boy.Good aunt, you wept not for our father's death;How can we aid you with our kindred tears?Girl.Our fatherless distress was left unmoan'd;Your widow-dolour likewise be unwept!

Boy.Good aunt, you wept not for our father's death;

How can we aid you with our kindred tears?

Girl.Our fatherless distress was left unmoan'd;

Your widow-dolour likewise be unwept!

ii.ii. 74, &c.

The death of the King, so unexpectedly linked to that of Clarence, removes from the Queen and her kindred the sole bulwark to the hated Woodville family, and leaves them at the mercy of their enemies.Hastings.A third nemesis Action has Hastings for its subject.i.i. 66;iii.ii. 58, &c.Hastings is the head of the court-faction which is opposed to the Queen and her allies, and he passes all bounds of decency in his exultation at the fate which overwhelms his adversaries:

But I shall laugh at this a twelvemonth hence,That they who brought me in my master's hate,I live to look upon their tragedy.

But I shall laugh at this a twelvemonth hence,

That they who brought me in my master's hate,

I live to look upon their tragedy.

He even forgets his dignity as a nobleman, and stops on his way to the Tower to chat with a mere officer of the court,iii.ii. 97.in order to tell him the news of which he is full, that his enemies are to die that day at Pomfret. Yet this very journey of Hastings is his journey to the block; the same cruel fate which had descended upon his opponents, from the same agent and by the same unscrupulous doom, is dealt out to Hastings in his turn.Buckingham.In this treacherous casting off of Hastings when he is no longer useful, Buckingham has been a prime agent.iii.ii, from 114.Buckingham amused himself with the false security of Hastings, adding to Hastings's innocent expression of his intention to stay dinner at the Tower the aside

And supper too, although thou know'st it not;

while in the details of the judicial murder he plays second to Richard. By precisely similar treachery he is himself castoff when he hesitates to go further with Richard's villainous schemes;iv.ii, from 86.and in precisely similar manner the treachery is flavoured with contempt.

Buck.I am thus bold to put your grace in mindOf what you promised me.K. Rich.Well, but what's o'clock?Buck.Upon the stroke of ten.K. Rich.Well, let it strike.Buck.Why let it strike?K. Rich.Because that, like a Jack, thou keep'st the strokeBetwixt thy begging and my meditation.I am not in the giving vein to-day.Buck.Why, then resolve me whether you will or no.K. Rich.Tut, tut.Thou troublest me; I am not in the vein.[Exeunt all but Buckingham.Buck.Is it even so? rewards he my true serviceWith such deep contempt? made I him king for this?O, let me think on Hastings, and be goneTo Brecknock, while my fearful head is on!

Buck.I am thus bold to put your grace in mind

Of what you promised me.

K. Rich.Well, but what's o'clock?

Buck.Upon the stroke of ten.

K. Rich.Well, let it strike.

Buck.Why let it strike?

K. Rich.Because that, like a Jack, thou keep'st the stroke

Betwixt thy begging and my meditation.

I am not in the giving vein to-day.

Buck.Why, then resolve me whether you will or no.

K. Rich.Tut, tut.

Thou troublest me; I am not in the vein.

[Exeunt all but Buckingham.

Buck.Is it even so? rewards he my true service

With such deep contempt? made I him king for this?

O, let me think on Hastings, and be gone

To Brecknock, while my fearful head is on!

The four nemeses formed into a system by nemesis as a link.

These four Nemesis Actions, it will be observed, are not separate trains of incident going on side by side, they are linked together into a system, the law of which is seen to be that those who triumph in one nemesis become the victims of the next; so that the whole suggests a 'chain of destruction,' like that binding together the orders of the brute creation which live by preying upon one another. When Clarence perished it was the King who dealt the doom and the Queen's party who triumphed: the wheel of Nemesis goes round and the King's death follows the death of his victim, the Queen's kindred are naked to the vengeance of their enemies, and Hastings is left to exult. Again the wheel of Nemesis revolves, and Hastings at the moment of his highest exultation is hurled to destruction, while Buckingham stands by to point the moral with a gibe. Once more the wheel goes round, and Buckingham hears similar gibes addressed to himself and points the same moral in his own person. Thus the portion of the drama we have so far consideredyields us a pattern within a pattern, a series of Nemesis Actions woven into a complete underplot by a connecting-link which is also Nemesis.

The 'Enveloping Action' a nemesis.

Following out the same general idea we may proceed to notice how the dramatic pattern is surrounded by a fringe or border. The picture of life presented in a play will have the more reality if it be connected with a life wider than its own. There is no social sphere, however private, but is to some extent affected by a wider life outside it, this by one wider still, until the great world is reached the story of which is History. The immediate interest may be in a single family, but it will be a great war which, perhaps, takes away some member of this family to die in battle, or some great commercial crisis which brings mutation of fortune to the obscure home. The artists of fiction are solicitous thus to suggest connections between lesser and greater; it is the natural tendency of the mind to pass from the known to the unknown, and if the artist can derive the movements in his little world from the great world outside, he appears to have given his fiction a basis of admitted truth to rest on. This device of enclosing the incidents of the actual story in a framework of great eventsâ€”technically, the 'Enveloping Action'â€”is one which is common in Shakespeare; it is enough to instance such a case asA Midsummer Night's Dream, in which play a fairy story has a measure of historic reality given to it by its connection with the marriage of personages so famous as Theseus and Hippolyta. In the present case, the main incidents and personages belong to public life; nevertheless the effect in question is still secured, and the contest of factions with which the play is occupied is represented as making up only a few incidents in the great feud of Lancaster and York. This Enveloping Action of the whole play, the War of the Roses, is marked with special clearness: two personages are introduced for the sole purpose of giving it prominence.ii.ii. 80.The Duchess of York is by her years andposition the representative of the whole house; the factions who in the play successively triumph and fall are all descended from herself; she says:

Alas, I am the mother of these moans!Their woes are parcell'd, mine are general.

Alas, I am the mother of these moans!

Their woes are parcell'd, mine are general.

i.iii, from 111; andiv.iv. 1-125.

And probabilities are forced to bring in Queen Margaret, the head and sole rallying-point of the ruined Lancastrians: when the two aged women are confronted the whole civil war is epitomised. It is hardly necessary to point out that this Enveloping Action is itself a Nemesis Action. All the rising and falling, the suffering and retaliation that we actually see going on between the different sections of the Yorkist house, constitute a detail in a wider retribution:esp.ii.ii;iv.i;iv.iv.the presence of the Duchess gives to the incidents a unity,ii.iii; andiv.iv.Queen Margaret's function is to point out that this unity of woe is only the nemesis falling on the house of York for their wrongs to the house of Lancaster. Thus the pattern made up of so many reiterations of nemesis is enclosed in a border which itself repeats the same figure.

The Enveloping Nemesis carried on into indefiniteness.

The effect is carried further. Generally the Enveloping Action is a sort of curtain by which our view of a drama is bounded; in the present case the curtain is at one point lifted, and we get a glimpse into the world beyond. Queen Margaret has surprised the Yorkist courtiers, and her prophetic denunciations are still ringing, in which she points to the calamities her foes have begun to suffer as retribution for the woes of which her fallen greatness is the representativeâ€”i.iii. 174-194.when Gloster suddenly turns the tables upon her.

The curse my noble father laid on thee,When thou didst crown his warlike brows with paperAnd with thy scorns drew'st rivers from his eyes,And then, to dry them, gavest the duke a cloutSteep'd in the faultless blood of pretty Rutland,â€”His curses, then from bitterness of soulDenounced against thee, are all fall'n upon thee;And God, not we, hath plagu'd thy bloody deed.

The curse my noble father laid on thee,

When thou didst crown his warlike brows with paper

And with thy scorns drew'st rivers from his eyes,

And then, to dry them, gavest the duke a clout

Steep'd in the faultless blood of pretty Rutland,â€”

His curses, then from bitterness of soul

Denounced against thee, are all fall'n upon thee;

And God, not we, hath plagu'd thy bloody deed.

And the new key-note struck by Gloster is taken up in chorus by the rest, who find relief from the crushing effect of Margaret's curses by pressing the charge home upon her. This is only a detail, but it is enough to carry the effect of the Enveloping Action a degree further back in time: the events of the play are nemesis on York for wrongs done to Lancaster, but now, it seems, these old wrongs against Lancaster were retribution for yet older crimes Lancaster had committed against York. As in architecture the vista is contrived so as to carry the general design of the building into indefiniteness, so here, while the grand nemesis, of which Margaret's presence is the representative, shuts in the play like a veil, the momentary lifting of the veil opens up a vista of nemeses receding further and further back into history.

The one attempt to reverse the nemesis confirms it.

Once more. All that we have seen suggests it as a sort of law to the feud of York and Lancaster that each is destined to wreak vengeance on the other, and then itself suffer in turn.i.ii.But at one notable point of the play an attempt is made to evade the hereditary nemesis by the marriage of Richard and Lady Anne. Anne, daughter to Warwickâ€”the grand deserter to the Lancastrians and martyr to their causeâ€”widow to the murdered heir of the house and chief mourner to its murdered head, is surely the greatest sufferer of the Lancastrians at the hands of the Yorkists. Richard is certainly the chief avenger of York upon Lancaster. When the chief source of vengeance and the chief sufferer are united in the closest of all bonds, the attempt to evade Nemesis becomes ideal. Yet what is the consequence? This attempt of Lady Anne to evade the hereditary curse proves the very channel by which the curse descends upon herself.iv.i. 66-87.We see her once more: she is then on her way to the Tower, and we hear her tell the strange story of her wooing, and wish the crown were 'red hot steel to sear her to the brain'; never, she says, since her unionwith Richard has she enjoyed the golden dew of sleep; she is but waiting for the destruction, by which, no doubt, Richard will shortly rid himself of her.

To counteract the effect of repetition the nemeses are specially emphasised:

An objection may, however, here present itself, that continual repetition of an idea like Nemesis, tends to weaken its artistic effect, until it comes to be taken for granted. No doubt it is a law of taste that force may be dissipated by repetition if carried beyond a certain point. But it is to be noted, on the other hand, what pains Shakespeare has taken to counteract the tendency in the present instance. The force of a nemesis may depend upon a fitness that addresses itself to the spectator's reflection, or it may be measured by the degree to which the nemesis is brought into prominence in the incidents themselves.by recognition,In the incidents of the present play special means are adopted to make the recognition of the successive nemeses as they arise emphatic. In the first place the nemesis is in each case pointed out at the moment of its fulfilment.i.iv, from 18.In the case of Clarence his story of crime and retribution is reflected in his dream before it is brought to a conclusion in reality; and wherein the bitterness of this review consists, we see when he turns to his sympathising jailor and says:

i.iv. 66.

O Brackenbury, I have done those things,Which now bear evidence against my soul,For Edward's sake: and see how he requites me!

O Brackenbury, I have done those things,

Which now bear evidence against my soul,

For Edward's sake: and see how he requites me!

The words have already been quoted in which the King recognises how God's justice has overtaken him for his part in Clarence's death, and those in which the children of Clarence taunt the Queen with her having herself to bear the bereavement she has made them suffer. As the Queen's kindred are being led to their death, one of them exclaims:

iii.iii. 15.

Now Margaret's curse is fall'n upon our headsFor standing by when Richard stabb'd her son.

Now Margaret's curse is fall'n upon our heads

For standing by when Richard stabb'd her son.

Hastings, when his doom has wakened him from his infatuation, recollects a priest he had met on his way to theTower, with whom he had stopped to talk about the discomfiture of his enemies:

iii.iv. 89.

O, now I want the priest that spake to me!

Buckingham on his way to the scaffold apostrophises the souls of his victims:

v.i. 7.

If that your moody discontented soulsDo through the clouds behold this present hour,Even for revenge mock my destruction.

If that your moody discontented souls

Do through the clouds behold this present hour,

Even for revenge mock my destruction.

iv.iv. 1, 35.

And such individual notes of recognition are collected into a sort of chorus when Margaret appears the second time to point out the fulfilment of her curses, and sits down beside the old Duchess and her daughter-in-law to join in the 'society of sorrow' and 'cloy her' with beholding the revenge for which she has hungered.

by prophecy,

Again, the nemeses have a further emphasis given to them by prophecy.i.iii, from 195.As Queen Margaret's second appearance is to mark the fulfilment of a general retribution, so her first appearance denounced it beforehand in the form of curses. And the effect is carried on in individual prophecies: the Queen's friends as they suffer foresee that the turn of the opposite party will come:

iii.iii. 7.

You live that shall cry woe for this hereafter;

and Hastings prophesies Buckingham's doom:

iii.iv. 109.

They smile at me that shortly shall be dead.

It is as if the atmosphere cleared for each sufferer with the approach of death, and they then saw clearly the righteous plan on which the universe is constructed, and which had been hidden from them by the dust of life.

and especially by irony.

But there is a third means, more powerful than either recognition or prophecy, which Shakespeare has employed to make his Nemesis Actions emphatic. The danger of an effect becoming tame by repetition he has met by giving to each train of nemesis a flash of irony at some point of its course. In the case of Lady Anne we have already seen how the exact channel Nemesis chooses by which to descend uponher is the attempt she made to avert it. She had bitterly cursed her husband's murderer:

iv.i. 75.

And be thy wifeâ€”if any be so madâ€”As miserable by the life of theeAs thou hast made me by my dear lord's death!

And be thy wifeâ€”if any be so madâ€”

As miserable by the life of thee

As thou hast made me by my dear lord's death!

In spite of this she had yielded to Richard's mysterious power, and so, as she feels, proved thesubject of her own heart's curse. Again, it was noticed in the preceding study how the Queen, less hard than the rest in that wicked court, or perhaps softened by the spectacle of her dying husband, essayed to reverse, when too late, what had been done against Clarence;ii.i. 134.Gloster skilfully turned this compunction of conscience into a ground of suspicion on which he traded to bring all the Queen's friends to the block, and thus a moment's relenting was made into a means of destruction.i.iv. 187, 199, 200, 206.In Clarence's struggle for life, as one after another the threads of hope snap, as the appeal to law is met by the King's command, the appeal to heavenly law by the reminder of his own sin,i.iv. 232.he comes to rest for his last and surest hope upon his powerful brother Glosterâ€”and the very murderers catch the irony of the scene:

Clar.If you be hired for meed, go back again,And I will send you to my brother Gloster,Who shall reward you better for my lifeThan Edward will for tidings of my death.Sec. Murd.You are deceived, your brother Gloster hates you.Clar.O, no, he loves me, and he holds me dear:Go you to him from me.Both.Ay, so we will.Clar.Tell him, when that our princely father YorkBless'd his three sons with his victorious arm,And charg'd us from his soul to love each other,He little thought of this divided friendship:Bid Gloster think of this, and he will weep.First Murd.Ay, millstones; as he lesson'd us to weep.Clar.O, do not slander him, for he is kind.First Murd.Right,As snow in harvest. Thou deceivest thyself:'Tis he that sent us hither now to slaughter thee.Clar.It cannot be; for when I parted with him,He hugg'd me in his arms, and swore, with sobs,That he would labour my delivery.Sec. Murd.Why, so he doth, now he delivers theeFrom this world's thraldom to the joys of heaven.

Clar.If you be hired for meed, go back again,

And I will send you to my brother Gloster,

Who shall reward you better for my life

Than Edward will for tidings of my death.

Sec. Murd.You are deceived, your brother Gloster hates you.

Clar.O, no, he loves me, and he holds me dear:

Go you to him from me.

Both.Ay, so we will.

Clar.Tell him, when that our princely father York

Bless'd his three sons with his victorious arm,

And charg'd us from his soul to love each other,

He little thought of this divided friendship:

Bid Gloster think of this, and he will weep.

First Murd.Ay, millstones; as he lesson'd us to weep.

Clar.O, do not slander him, for he is kind.

First Murd.Right,

As snow in harvest. Thou deceivest thyself:

'Tis he that sent us hither now to slaughter thee.

Clar.It cannot be; for when I parted with him,

He hugg'd me in his arms, and swore, with sobs,

That he would labour my delivery.

Sec. Murd.Why, so he doth, now he delivers thee

From this world's thraldom to the joys of heaven.

ii.i. 95.

In the King's case a special incident is introduced into the scene to point the irony. Before Edward can well realise the terrible announcement of Clarence's death, the decorum of the royal chamber is interrupted by Derby, who bursts in, anxious not to lose the portion of the king's life that yet remains, in order to beg a pardon for his follower. The King feels the shock of contrast:

Have I a tongue to doom my brother's death,And shall the same give pardon to a slave?

Have I a tongue to doom my brother's death,

And shall the same give pardon to a slave?

The prerogative of mercy that exists in so extreme a case as the murder of a 'righteous gentleman,' and is so passionately sought by Derby for a servant, is denied to the King himself for the deliverance of his innocent brother.iii.ii, from 41.The nemesis on Hastings is saturated with irony; he has the simplest reliance on Richard and on 'his servant Catesby,' who has come to him as the agent of Richard's treachery; and the very words of the scene have a double significance that all see but Hastings himself.

Hast.I tell thee, Catesby,â€”Cate.What, my lord?Hast.Ere a fortnight make me elderI'll send some packing that yet think not on it.Cate.'Tis a vile thing to die, my gracious lord,When men are unprepared, and look not for it.Hast.O monstrous, monstrous! and so falls it outWith Rivers, Vaughan, Grey: and so 'twill doWith some men else, who think themselves as safeAs thou and I.

Hast.I tell thee, Catesby,â€”

Cate.What, my lord?

Hast.Ere a fortnight make me elder

I'll send some packing that yet think not on it.

Cate.'Tis a vile thing to die, my gracious lord,

When men are unprepared, and look not for it.

Hast.O monstrous, monstrous! and so falls it out

With Rivers, Vaughan, Grey: and so 'twill do

With some men else, who think themselves as safe

As thou and I.

As the scenes with Margaret constituted a general summary of the individual prophecies and recognitions,ii.i.so the Reconciliation Scene around the King's dying bed may be said to gather into a sort of summary the irony distributed throughthe play; for the effect of the incident is that the different parties pray for their own destruction.ii.i. 32.In this scene Buckingham has taken the lead and struck the most solemn notes in his pledge of amity;v.i, from 10.when Buckingham comes to die, his bitterest thought seems to be that the day of his death is All Souls' Day.

This is the daythat, in King Edward's time,I wish'd might fall on me, when I was foundFalse to his children or his wife's allies;This is the day wherein I wish'd to fallBy the false faith of him I trusted most; ...That high All-Seer that I dallied withHath turn'd my feigned prayer on my headAnd given in earnest what I begg'd in jest.

This is the daythat, in King Edward's time,

I wish'd might fall on me, when I was found

False to his children or his wife's allies;

This is the day wherein I wish'd to fall

By the false faith of him I trusted most; ...

That high All-Seer that I dallied with

Hath turn'd my feigned prayer on my head

And given in earnest what I begg'd in jest.

By devices, then, such as these; by the sudden revelation of a remedy when it is just too late to use it; by the sudden memory of clear warnings blindly missed; by the spectacle of a leaning for hope upon that which is known to be ground for despair; by attempts to retreat or turn aside proving short cuts to destruction; above all by the sufferer's perception that he himself has had a chief share in bringing about his doom:â€”by such irony the monotony of Nemesis is relieved, and fatality becomes flavoured with mockery.

This multiplication of Nemesis a dramatic background for the villainy of Richard.

Dramatic design, like design which appeals more directly to the eye, has its perspective: to miss even by a little the point of view from which it is to be contemplated is enough to throw the whole into distortion. So readers who are not careful to watch the harmony between Character and Plot have often found in the present play nothing but wearisome repetition. Or, as there is only a step between the sublime and the ridiculous, this masterpiece of Shakespearean plot has suggested to them only the idea of Melodrama,â€”that curious product of dramatic feeling without dramatic inventiveness, with its world in which poetic justice has become prosaic, in which conspiracy is never so superhumanly secret but there comes a still more superhuman detection, and howeversuccessful villainy may be for a moment the spectator confidently relies on its being eventually disposed of by a summary 'off with his head.' The point of view thus missed in the present play is that this network of Nemesis is all needed to give dramatic reality to the colossal villainy of the principal figure. When isolated, the character of Richard is unrealisable from its offence against an innate sense of retribution. Accordingly Shakespeare projects it into a world of which, in whatever direction we look, retribution is the sole visible pattern; in which, as we are carried along by the movement of the play, the unvarying reiteration of Nemesis has the effect ofgiving rhythm to fate.

The motive force of the whole play is another nemesis: the Life and Death of Richard.

What the action of the play has yielded so far to our investigation has been independent of the central personage: we have now to connect Richard himself with the plot. Although the various Nemesis Actions have been carried on by their own motion and by the force of retribution as a principle of moral government, yet there is not one of them which reaches its goal without at some point of its course receiving an impetus from contact with Richard. Richard is thus the source of movement to the whole drama, communicating his own energy through all parts. It is only fitting that the motive force to this system of nemeses should be itself a grand Nemesis Action, theLife and Death, or crime and retribution,of Richard III. The hero's rise has been sufficiently treated in the preceding study; it remains to trace his fall.

The fall of Richard: not a shock but a succession of stages.

This fall of Richard is constructed on Shakespeare's favourite plan; its force is measured, not by suddenness and violence, but by protraction and the perception of distinct stagesâ€”the crescendo in music as distinguished from the fortissimo. Such a fall is not a mere passage through the airâ€”one shock and then all is overâ€”but a slipping down the face of the precipice, with desperate clingings and consciously increasing impetus: its effect is the one inexhaustibleemotion of suspense. If we examine the point at which the fall begins we are reminded that the nemesis on Richard is different in its type from the others in the play.Not a nemesis of equality but of sureness.These are (like that on Shylock) of theequalitytype, of which the motto is measure for measure:iii.iii. 15.and, with his usual exactness, Shakespeare gives us a turning-point in the precise centre of the play, where, as the Queen's kindred are being borne to their death, we get the first recognition that the general retribution denounced by Margaret has begun to work. But the turning-point of Richard's fate is reserved till long past the centre of the play; his is the nemesis ofsureness, in which the blow is delayed that it may accumulate force. Not that this turning-point is reserved to the very end;The turning-point: irony of its delay.the change of fortune appears just when Richard hascommitted himselfto his final crime in the usurpationâ€”the murder of the childrenâ€”the crime from which his most unscrupulous accomplice has drawn back.iv.ii, from 46.The effect of this arrangement is to make the numerous crimes which follow appear to come by necessity; he is 'so far in blood that sin will pluck on sin'; he is forced to go on heaping up his villainies with Nemesis full in his view. This turning-point appears in the simple announcement that 'Dorset has fled to Richmond.' There is an instantaneous change in Richard to an attitude of defence, which is maintained to the end. His first instinct is action: but as soon as we have heard the rapid scheme of measuresâ€”most of them crimesâ€”by which he prepares to meet his dangers, then he can give himself up to meditation;from 98.and we now begin to catch the significance of what has been announced. The name of Richmond has been just heard for the first time in this play. But as Richard meditates we learn how Henry VI prophesied that Richmond should be a king while he was but a peevish boy. Again, Richard recollects how lately, while viewing a castle in the west, the mayor, who showed him over it, mispronounced its name as 'Richmond'â€”and he hadstarted, for a bard of Ireland had told him he should not live long after he had seen Richmond. Thus the irony that has given point to all the other retributions in the play is not wanting in the chief retribution of all: Shakespeare compensates for so long keeping the grand Nemesis out of sight by thus representing Richard as gradually realising thatthe finger of Nemesis has been pointing at him all his life and he has never seen it!

Back to Index Next