* * * * *
The Following Paragraph, Published In The New York Clipper Of February5, 1895, Tells A Quiet Little Story Well Worthy Of Record In The Guide:"A.G. Spalding, Of The Chicago Club, Was Asked How So Much Stock Of TheNew York Club Came To Be Owned By Outside Parties, And He Said: 'well, IWill Tell You. During The Troublous Brotherhood Times Of 1890, Along InJuly, I Think, I Was Suddenly Summoned To New York. I Went Direct ToMr. Abell's House, By Request, Entirely Oblivious Of The Object Of TheSudden Call, And There Met Soden Of Boston, Reach Of Philadelphia, ByrneOf Brooklyn, Brush Of Indianapolis, And One Or Two Others. There WeReceived The Pleasant Information From John B. Day That The New YorkClub Was Financially At The End Of Its Rope, And Must Have ImmediateAssistance. Imagine Our Surprise When We Were Told That The Club MustHave $80,000 At Once To Carry It Through The Season, Or The New YorkClub Must Give Up Its End Of The Fight. When We Had Collected OurSenses Sufficiently To Speak, It Was The General Opinion That If The NewYork Club Failed At That Stage Of The Game, The Fight With TheBrotherhood Was Lost, And The Future Of The Old National League Was, ToSay The Least, Uncertain; So It Was Finally Decided That We Must SaveThe New York Club At All Hazards, And Before We Separated That Night IAgreed To Provide $20,000, Soden And Brush Came Forward With SimilarAmounts, And The Balance Was Taken By Reach, Abell And One Or TwoOthers, As I Remember. It Was Pretty Costly, But That Prompt Act SavedThe National League, And, By Saving It, The Future Of Professional BaseBall In This Country Was, In My Opinion, Also Saved. This Will ExplainHow I First Became Interested In The New York Club, And, As A Result,Find Myself Criticised For Ever Being Permitted To Hold Any Of TheStock. Of This $20,000 Stock Alloted To Chicago, Anson Took And PaidCash For $5,000, Another Chicago Gentleman Took $5,000, My BrotherWalter $5,000 And Myself $5,000. Afterward I Sold Or Practically Gave MyStock To My Brother, And I Think He Picked Up Some More While He Was ADirector Of The Club. That Brotherhood Fight Was A Great Fight, And OneThat Will Probably Never Be Duplicated. The Real Inside History Of ThatStruggle, And Its Final Settlement, Was Never Written, But If It EverIs, It Will Prove Quite Interesting, As Well As Quite A Surprise To TheBase Ball Men Of That Day. But Why Talk In This Strain Any Longer. YouKnow I Am Out Of Active Base Ball, And These Reminiscences SimplyEmphasize The Fact That I Ought To Be Out Of It, For I Am Getting TooOld.'"
What A Commentary On The Selfish Greed Of The Overpaid Star Players OfThe "Out-For-The-Stuff" Class Of The Professional FraternityMr. Spalding's Account Of One Costly Result Of The Players' Revolt Of1890 The Above Story Presents. It Also Tells The True Story Of How TheAbove-Named Magnates Of The Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia, Brooklyn AndIndianapolis Clubs Of 1890 Came To Be Financially Interested In The NewYork Club, Not For Profit, But To Save The Disruption Of The League.
* * * * *
The veteran Comiskey thus explains the difference in one special respect, between a seasoned player and acolt—and he is one who ought to know, you know. He said, in an interview: "No one appreciates the superiority of hustling, aggressive youngsters over the old standbys of the diamond more than I do. A seasoned player, as a rule, develops into a mechanical player who is always watching his averages and keeping tab on himself. While he may be too loyal to shirk, he will not take a chance which he is not compelled to. Especially is this true in running bases. How many of these old players will slide or go into a bag when they are blocked off? Very few. On the other hand, a young player appreciates that he has to make a reputation, while the old player, who has one to protect, is in the business for a livelihood and nothing else. Popular applause has lost its favor for him, and, while it is not unwelcome, it does not stimulate him to renewed exertions as it did when he began his career. It is entirely different with the man who is trying to establish himself in the major league. An ambitious young player thinks that the game depends upon him, and is dead sure that every crank agrees with him. Give him a good send-off in the papers, or let his manager commend him for a creditable piece of work, and he will break his neck in his efforts to deserve another installment to-morrow. The public demands snappy ball, and the young players are the only ones who can serve up that article."
In his remarks, Comiskey furthermore said: "The good effect of a manager's or captain's praise of a 'colt' is surprising. Both of these officials of the League clubs, almost without exception, are apt to be silent as the grave when a player makes a good point or a fine stop or catch; but the moment he fails to make an almost impossible play then comes the ill-natured snarl or the rutty growl. Harry Wright stands out alone as the only manager or captain to encourage a player with praise."
* * * * *
A Philadelphia scribe, in commenting on the rowdy ball playing of 1894 in the League ranks, says: "We could fill pages with evidence of the rowdyism indulged in by the majority of the League teams during the season of 1894, and that, too, if we were only to confine ourselves to the local reports of the season at Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and half a dozen other cities." As the Cleveland Leader had it, in commenting upon one of the Baltimore-Cleveland games:
"I say it with reluctance—for I have always admired Ned Hanlon's pluck—that the national game never received so severe a set-back as it did during the last Baltimore series here. The effort to spike players, the constant flow of profanity and vulgarity, the incessant and idiotic abuse of an umpire, all combined to make the Baltimore club—that local people have been led to believe was made of a crowd of earnest, honest players—thoroughly despised and detested. In ten years' experience in scoring games in Cleveland I have never heard such a torrent of vulgarity, profanity and brutal, senseless abuse heaped upon an umpire as Lynch stood from the Baltimore players upon the field here."
Similar charges against visiting teams were made by the Pittsburgh people against the Cleveland team; by the Philadelphia scribes against the Bostons, etc. In fact, proof, and plenty of it, was easily attainable from the reports from every League city during 1894, to a more or less extent.
The question apropos to this comment is, "What are you going to do about it" in 1895, Messrs. Magnates?
* * * * *
John Rowe, the veteran player, who was one of the "Big Four," transferred from the Buffalo club to the Detroit club, in the fall of 1885, is a firm believer in Southern trips during the preliminary season, to get the players in condition for a championship season. In speaking on that subject, he said: "The year the Detroits won the National League pennant we went South, and before the regular season opened that team had played over 40 games. In consequence we were in the acme of condition, and some of the teams nearly lost their breath when they tackled us for the first time. The men could hit like fiends, and field fast and perfect. There were no cases of 'charley horse' in our team, and as for 'glass arms,' they were not included in our outfit. It is a great thing, I tell you, and the managers who take their men into a warm climate are doing a sensible act. According to my idea the plan is to first practice until the players become limbered up, say for a week or so, before attempting to play a game. Then get in as many games as possible, without overdoing it, until the regular schedule begins, In the exhibition games the experiments can be tried out, and the men will gradually learn to play together, which means much to a club. Of course, there is more or less luck in base ball, but at the same time luck can't win alone all the time. Team-work and an agreeable manager count a long ways toward winning a pennant." We would add to the last line, that the absence of drinking and hoodlumism in the ranks is equally a necessity.
* * * * *
In the arena of minor leagues, in professional baseball, outside of the sectional leagues, like those of the Western, Eastern, Southern, New England and other like leagues, there is no class of minor leagues which is so much fostered as individual State leagues. Trio or duo State leagues should be avoided except in very exceptional cases. In the organization of the various minor leagues in existence, one special point has been too much neglected, and that is the importance of making the league's pennant race specially attractive by the attractive character of the honors to be won. Sectional leagues, made up of well-arranged circuits, present as good attractions in their championship honors at stake as that of the great major league, and next to these come the pennant races of State leagues. But what special object, in this respect, is there to strike for in the championships of trio or duo State leagues? None whatever. They are mere gate-money organizations, lacking all of the attractive features of sectional and State league pennant races. State leagues also possess the advantage of not interfering with the interests of the sectional leagues which include State clubs. Take any State in which professional base ball flourishes, and in the State there will be found two classes of professional clubs, viz., the one strong class, which exist in the larger cities of the State, and the weaker class which represents the smaller towns. The sectional leagues, of course, seek to attach the former to their circuits, leaving the latter eligible for State league circuits.
* * * * *
For many years past columns of space in papers making base ball a specialty have been occupied with long arrays of figures giving the averages of the players in the batting and fielding departments of the game. To such an extent has this feature of the annual statistics of the game been carried that the records based upon these averages have come to be regarded by the players as the primary object in view during each season's work in the field. As a result of this system those club directors and managers who have never fully examined into the merits of the subject, and who are not, therefore, aware of the fact that, as criterions of the most skilful play in each department, these averages are comparatively useless, have been led into the costly error of making their selections for their teams each season upon the basis of the figures of the players' averages, and hence the customary announcement made at the beginning of each season that "our team has the best batting average of the season." It is about time that the fallacy of this average business should be shown up in its true light and that the existing system of making out averages should be so changed as to make it some sort of a test of a player's skill in his home position, which it certainly is not now. The worst of this average business as it prevails now is that it is a powerful incentive for every player to make "playing for a record" his principal object in his season's work, and that all-important duty, "playing for the side," a matter of secondary consideration.
* * * * *
The cranks' title of "Giants," given years ago to the New York club's team, has become a misnomer. The team most entitled to it in 1894 was that of the Chicago club, no other club team making such a show of heavyweight players last season as did Anson's real "Giants," as will be seen by the appended record. Look at the figures of their biggest men:
——————————————————————Height WeightFeet Inches lbs.——————————————————————Schriver, catcher 5 10 185Camp, pitcher 6 160Anson, first base 6 1 202L. Camp, second base 6 165Parrott, third base 5 11 160Clayton, short stop 6 1 180Decker, left field 6 1 180Lange, centre field 6 1 180Dungan, right field 5 11 180—— ——— ——Average 6 173——————————————————————
How does Murphy, Fuller, Burke, Wardet alstand in weight and size compared to the above "Giants"?
* * * * *
Here is something worthy of note by club managers who begin to get their teams together each spring, which we clipped from the St. Louis Sporting News of last December. The editor of the News said: "The player that is on the upward path is the man for success. He is playing for something far more than the salary he gets. He is looking forward to a place in the foremost ranks of the nation's ball players. Consequently he proves to be a hard worker at all times. He tries to land his club in the top notch, and his record, for the part he took, stands out as a recommendation to all the world. On the other hand, the older player, who has made his record and is going down again, has lost all his ambition. He can put no life into the club, his ginger has been expended in the days gone by, and the people look upon him as a back number. He sticks to the profession generally for a livelihood. He wants to play so as to hold his place, but he has lost the powers that he once had, and cannot do what he would like to accomplish. The old-timers had better get a hump on themselves this year, else will the youngsters drive them out of the business."
* * * * *
The well-known base ball writer, Mr. Pringle, was right when he said: "It is useless to get new rules until existing ones have been rigidly enforced and tested." It is an undeniable fact that the umpires of 1894, almost without exception, failed to properly enforce the rules governing the umpire's duties. In this regard Mr. Pringle said: "The rules relating to the duties of umpires are all right. They have power to stop all rowdy conduct on the field, but the trouble has been the lack of nerve on the part of umpires to enforce the rules." This, and the fact that the presidents and directors of clubs who governed the managers and captains of teams, were largely to blame in the matter for not backing up the umpires as they should have done. The latter have arduous duties enough to discharge as it is without their finding obstacles in their way in the partisan actions of club officials who control club managers and captains. When this class supports the umpires against the club teams it will be time enough to lay the whole onus of hoodlumism in the ranks on the umpires—not until then.
* * * * *
A Philadelphia scribe hits the nail on the head when, in commenting on the existing abuses of kicking and dirty ball playing in the League arena, he says: "If the club owners would take the initiative in enforcing decorum upon their players, upon pain of fine or suspension, instead of shifting the burden and onus upon the umpire, the problem of order at ball games would be solved at once. But the majority of magnates and managers, while openly, hypocritically, deploring dirty ball playing, secretly wink at it and rather enjoy it, especially if their particular club secures advantages from it. The players all know this, and so do the umpires; hence the former presume upon it, while the latter weaken in their intent and desire to strictly enforce the rules. When the duty of preserving order on the field and decorum among the players is devolved upon the clubs, who represent direct authority, power and responsibility, instead of irresponsible umpires, then, and not till then will the evils complained of cease, or at least be mitigated."
Al Wright, the base ball editor of the New York Clipper, in its issue of February 15, 1895, had this noteworthy paragraph in its columns: "Frank C. Bancroft, the business manager of the Cincinnati club, in speaking about the equalization of the players of the major league teams, said: 'I am not a firm believer in the prevalent practice of selling the best men in a weak or tail-end team to one of the leading clubs, and register a vigorous kick against it. My plan is that the National League shall pass a rule forbidding the sale of a player from a club in the second division, to a club in the first division. I think this would, in a measure, prevent some of the hustling to dispose of a clever man for the sake of the cash that is in the trade. There is certainly some good arguments in the idea, and not one against it. The clubs of the second division have been too willing to dispose of their best men for a decent cash consideration, and the damage that has been done to the game is incalculable.'"
A young Brooklyn writer, in commenting on the threatened war on the reserve rule which Messrs. Richter, Pfeffer, Buckenberger and Barnie were active in promoting, said: "Since the National League and American Association amalgamated at Indianapolis in 1892 the League has not been a glorious success." The reply to this is a statement of fact which contradicts the above assertion very flatly. The reorganized National League started its new career in the spring of 1892 with an indebtedness, resulting from the base ball war of 1891, of over $150,000. At the close of the season of 1892 it had partially redeemed its heavy indebtedness, and by the close of the season of 1893 it had paid the debt off in full, and it closed the season of 1894 with a majority of its clubs having a surplus in their treasuries, and that, too, despite the hardest kind of times of financial depression. If this is not a glorious success, pray what is?
A Pittsburgh scribe, in commenting on the dead failure of the scheme to organize a new American Association, one object of which was to levy war upon the now permanently established rule of the National Agreement clubs, very pointedly said last winter that "such a scheme would be folly of the maddest kind. There is not a good reason, theoretical or practical, sentimental or otherwise, in support of it. The success of base ball, to a very great extent, depends on public sentiment, and we have seen what a base ball war did to that sentiment four years ago. There is one solid basis for all base ball organizations, and that is the reserve rule. The proposed organization ignores this fundamental and necessary principle, and consequently can only be compared to that foolish man who built a house on sand."
During the decade of the eighties the League's code of rules had this special clause in it:
"Any player who shall be in any way interested in any bet or wager on the game in which he takes part, either as a player, umpire, or scorer, shall be suspended from legal service as a member of any professional Association club for the season during which he shall have violated this rule."
The question is, Why was this important and much-needed rule taken from the code?
No player can play ball as he should do who is personally interested in any bet on the content he is engaged in; that is a fact too true to be contradicted. Independent of this fact, too. Experience has plainly shown that the step of betting on a game he plays in is but a short one from accepting bribes to lose a game. The rule should long ago have been replaced in the code.
The Cleveland Leader says: "The patrons of the game have begun to realize the true inwardness of scientific batting, as shown in the securing of single bases by well-timed place hits, safe taps of swiftly-pitched balls to short outfield, and skilful efforts in sacrifice hitting and bunting, every such hit forwarding a run or sending a run in. Of course, to occupants of the bleaching boards, as a rule, the great attraction is the long hit for a home run, which is made at the cost of a 120-yards sprint, and at the loss of all chances for skilful fielding. But to the best judges of scientific batting the safe tap of the swiftly pitched ball, the well-judged bunt or the effort to make a safe hit to right field, which, if it fails, at least yields a sacrifice hit, is far more attractive than the old rut of slugging for home runs and making fungo hits to the outfielders."
There is something to fight for in the winning of a State league's championship honors, while there is little or nothing at stake in a trio or duo State league. Suppose each State had a four or six club circuit, and at the close of its season, each August or September, what a paying series of October games could be arranged in the Southern section of the country in October for a grand championship series for the prize of leading all the State leagues of the country for the honors of the champion pennant of State league organizations? By all means let State leagues be organized, until every State in the Union—North, South, East and West—has its representative State league.
The fickle nature of base ball "rooters" was conspicuously shown at the Polo Grounds in 1894. At the end of the June campaign, when the New York "Giants" stood sixth in the race, Ward's stock among the local "cranks" and "rooters," stood below par; at the close of the July campaign, however, that same stock was at a premium; and yet it was the same John M. Ward at the head of the "Giants." In May there were "none so poor to do him reverence." In August, John was carried off the field a hero. Of such are the "cranks" and "rooters."
A Toronto paper says: "Spalding Brothers will present to the champion club of all regularly organized base ball leagues, junior or senior, in Canada, a valuable flag, 11x28, pennant shaped, made of serviceable white bunting, red lettered, and valued at $20. The flags will be forwarded, duty free, immediately after the season closes. Each league must consist of four or more clubs, and each club must play not less than 12 championship games." This is a good plan to encourage the game on foreign soil. It has worked well in England and Australia, too.
Among the magnates of the League who could be seen at nearly all of the home games of the twelve clubs during the past season were the Boston triumvirate, Messrs. Soden, Conant and Billings; the irrepressible Charley Byrne, of Brooklyn; the handsome Vonderhorst, of Baltimore; the smiling Eddie Talcott, of New York; the noted "Philadelphia lawyer" Rogers, of Philadelphia; the "Boss Manager" Von der Ahe, of St. Louis; the energetic Kerr, of Pittsburgh, and Al Spalding's successor, President Hart, of Chicago.
The Louisville team was a strong one as regards its individual players. But it lacked harmony in its ranks and suffered from cliques. With two ex-captains in its team, besides the one who ran it, but little else could be expected. Ambitious ex-captains are obstacles in the way of successful management of a team. One regular captain should be the rule, with an acknowledged lieutenant—a pair like Comiskey and Latham, who worked the old St. Louis "Browns" up to being four-time winners of pennant honors.
It is a noteworthy fact that Anson has been manager and captain of the Chicago club's teams since 1877, and from that year to this he has taken his team to the goal of the championship five years of the six the club won the pennant, A.G. Spalding being the manager in 1876, the first year the club won the honors. Fifteen successive years of management in one club beats the League's records in that respect.
[Illustration: P. T. POWERS, President Eastern League.][Illustration: Yale Team, '94.][Illustration: Harvard Team, '94.][Illustration: University of Pennsylvania Team, '94.][Illustration: Princeton Team, '94.]
#EASTERN LEAGUE SCHEDULE.# —————————————————————————————————-
Clubs. At Toronto. At Buffalo. At Rochester.
—————————————————————————————————- ……………. May 29, 30, 30 June 6, 7, 8 Toronto ……………. June 17, 18, 19 July 6, 8 ……………. July 15, 16 Aug. 14, 15, 16 —————————————————————————————————- May 24, 24 ……………. June 1, 3, 4 Buffalo May 31, July 1,2 ……………. July 9, 10 Sept. 11, 12, 14 ……………. Aug 17, 19, 20 —————————————————————————————————— June 10, 11, 12 June 13, 14, 15 ……………. Rochester July 12, 13 July 4, 4 ……………. Aug. 24, 26, 27 Aug 21, 22, 23 ……………. —————————————————————————————————- June 13, 14, 15 June 10, 11, 12 May 29, 30, 30 Syracuse July 9, 10 July 12, 13 July 1, 2 Aug. 21, 22, 23 Aug 24, 26, 27 Sept. 10, 11, 15 —————————————————————————————————- Wilkes- May 16, 17, 18 May 13, 14, 15 May 23, 25, 27 Barre July 26, 27 July 24, 25 July 20, 22 Sept. 3, 4, 5 Sept. 6, 7, 9 Aug 28, 29, 30 —————————————————————————————————- May 13, 14, 15 May 16, 17, 18 May 20, 21, 22 Scranton July 24, 25 July 26, 27 July 18, 19 Aug. 31, Sep. 2,2 Aug. 28, 29, 30 Sept. 6, 7, 9 —————————————————————————————————- Spring- May 20, 21, 22 May 23, 25, 27 May 13, 14, 15 field July 20, 22 July 18, 19 July 26, 27 Aug. 28, 29, 30 Aug. 31, Sep.2, 2 Sept. 3, 4, 5 —————————————————————————————————- Provi- May 23, 25, 27 May 20, 21, 22 May 16, 17, 18 dence July 18, 19 July 20, 22 July 24, 25 Sept. 6, 7, 9 Sept. 3, 4, 5 A'g 31, Sep. 2, 2 —————————————————————————————————-
—————————————————————————————————-
Clubs. At Syracuse. At Wilkes-Barre. At Scranton.
—————————————————————————————————- June 1, 3, 4 May 6, 7, 8 May 9, 10, 11 Toronto July 4, 4 June 21, 22 June 24, 25 Aug. 17, 19, 20 Aug. 10, 12, 13 Aug. 7, 8, 9 —————————————————————————————————- June 6, 7, 8 May 9, 10, 11 May 6, 7, 8 Buffalo July 6, 8 June 24, 25 June 21, 22 Aug. 14, 15, 16 Aug 7, 8, 9 Aug 10, 12, 13 —————————————————————————————————- June 17, 18, 19 Apr. 29, 30, May 1 May 2, 3, 4 Rochester July 15, 16 June 28, 29 June 26, 27 Sept. 12, 13, 14 July 30, 31 Ag. 1 Aug 2, 3, 5 —————————————————————————————————- ……………. May 2, 3, 4 Apr. 29, 30, May 1 Syracuse ……………. June 26, 27 June 28, 29 ……………. Aug 2, 3, 5 July 30, 31 Ag. 1 —————————————————————————————————- Wilkes- May 20, 21, 22 ……………. July 1, 3, 4 Barre July 18, 19 ……………. July 4, 4 Aug. 31, Sep. 2,2 ……………. Aug 14, 15, 16 —————————————————————————————————- May 23, 25, 27 May 29, 30, 30 ……………. Scranton July 20, 22 July 1, 2 ……………. Sept. 3, 4, 5 Aug. 17, 19, 20 ……………. —————————————————————————————————- Spring- May 16, 17, 18 June 6, 7, 8 June 10, 11, 12 field July 24, 25 July 15, 16 July 12, 13 Sept. 6, 7, 9 Sept. 13, 14, 15 Sept. 10, 11, 12 —————————————————————————————————- Provi- May 13, 14, 15 June 10, 11, 12 June 6, 7, 8 dence July 26, 27 July 12, 13 July 15, 16 Aug. 28, 29, 30 Sept. 10, 11, 12 Sept. 13, 14, 15 —————————————————————————————————-
————————————————————————
Clubs. At Springfield. At Providence.
———————————————————————— Apr 29, 30, May 1 May 2, 3, 4 Toronto June 28, 29 June 26, 27 Aug. 2, 3, 5 July. 30, 31 Ag.1 ———————————————————————— May 2, 3, 4 Ap. 29, 30, May 1 Buffalo June 26, 27 June 28, 29 July. 30, 31 Ag.1 Aug. 2, 3, 5 ———————————————————————— May 9, 10, 11 May 6, 7, 8 Rochester June 24, 25 June 21, 22 Aug 10, 12, 13 Aug 7, 8, 9 ———————————————————————— May 6, 7, 8 May 9, 10, 11 Syracuse June 21, 22 June 24, 25 Aug 7, 8, 9 Aug 10, 12, 13 ———————————————————————— Wilkes- June 17, 18 19 June 13, 14, 15 Barre July 6, 8 July 9, 10 Aug. 21, 22, 23 Aug. 24, 26, 27 ———————————————————————— June 13, 14, 15 June 17, 18 19 Scranton July 9, 10 July 6, 8 Aug. 24, 26, 27 Aug. 21, 22, 23 ———————————————————————— Spring- ……………. May 29, 30, 30 field ……………. July 4, 4 ……………. Aug. 17, 18, 20 ———————————————————————— Provi- June 1, 3, 4 ……………. dence July 1, 2 ……………. Aug. 14, 15, 16 ……………. ————————————————————————
The cities composing the Eastern League circuit are Toronto, Canada;Buffalo, N.Y.; Rochester, N.Y.; Syracuse, N.Y.; Providence, R.I.;Springfield, Mass.; Scranton,, Pa., and Wilkes-Barre, Pa.
The officers are; P.T. Powers, President, Secretary and Treasurer; headquarters, A.G. Spalding & Bros., 126 Nassau St., New York.
Board of Directors: James Franklin, Buffalo; George N. Kuntzsch,Syracuse; William H. Draper, Providence, and E.F. Bogert, Wilkes-Barre.
The base ball magnates of the Eastern League held their annual schedule meeting at the Fifth Avenue Hotel March 13th.
These delegates were present: President P.T. Powers, James Franklin andCharles H. Morton, Buffalo ; E.A. Johnson and John M. Battey,Providence; Charles F. Leimgruber and J.C. Chapman, Rochester; WilliamBarnie, Scranton; I.E. Sanborn and Thomas E. Burns, Springfield; GeorgeN. Kuntzsch, Syracuse; William Stark and Charles Maddock, Toronto;E.F. Bogert, L.W. Long and Dan Shannon, Wilkes-Barre.
The League has a great staff of umpires for this season, as will be seen from the following list appointed at the meeting: Tim C. Hurst, of Ashland, Pa.; Herman Doescher, of Binghamton; John H. Gaffney, of Worcester, and Charles N. Snyder, of Washington. It was voted to increase the staff to five, and President Powers will sign another umpire. He will also keep a number of reserve men in readiness to fill in as substitutes in place of local men, as formerly.
The constitution was subjected to a few minor changes, the most important being the change of date for the payment of the guarantee to finish the season ($250 per club) from May 1st to April 15th.
John Depinet, of Erie, and Lawrence T. Fassett, of Albany, were elected honorary members of the League, with all privileges of games, etc.
The Eastern League adopted the Spalding League Ball as the Official Ball for 1895, and it will be used in all League games.
#The Eastern League Averages.#
Sheehan of Springfield leads the entire batting list with the fat percentage of .416. Patchen of Scranton was second with .392, and Mulvey of Allentown-Yonkers was third, .391. All three of these are ahead of Drauby's record, .379, which led the Eastern League the previous year. Rudderham led the pitchers in fielding his position.
The club averages are significant. They show that the Providence champions turned up third in batting, and led the list in fielding. Thus they deserved to win, for the Springfields, second in batting, are third in fielding, tied with Troy; and Buffalo, first in batting, comes sixth in fielding. Scranton and Yonkers see-saw on the tail end. Wilkes-Barre is below the centre of the heap in both fielding and batting. In fact, the sum up of club averages in stick work and field work indicates that the clubs finished about as they deserved. The figures will give opportunity for a couple of hours study.
—————————————————————————————————————- 1 2 s n t d P A e G t B B r a R a a c m B u s s e e a n e e n s t s s s t NO. NAME. CLUB. . . . . . . —————————————————————————————————————- 1 Sheehan Springfield 32 144 31 60 2 .415 2 Parchen Scranton 32 135 15 53 5 .392 3 Mulvey Yonkers 22 92 13 36 2 .391 4 Kelley Yonkers 15 61 11 23 2 .377 5 P. Sweeney Yonkers 21 86 21 33 3 .372 6 Knight Wilkes-Barre and Providence 113 493 108 183 34 .371 7 Bassett Providence 109 484 125 178 32 .367 8 Smith Buffalo 24 96 14 35 3 .364 Rafter Binghamton and Syracuse 43 184 31 67 14 .364 10 Minnehan Syracuse 115 504 95 182 11 .361 11 O'Brien Binghamton 15 61 9 22 0 .360 12 Griffin Buffalo and Syracuse 106 465 103 167 14 .359 13 Raymond Binghamton 22 92 23 33 4 .358 14 Vickery Buffalo and Springfield 54 199 47 70 8 .356 15 Shearon Erie 103 145 108 158 23 .355 16 Dowse Binghamton, Buffalo, and 88 355 76 126 5 .354 Troy 17 Power Binghamton and Syracuse 79 328 72 116 15 .353 18 Collins Buffalo 125 562 126 198 18 .352 19 Drauby Buffalo 97 436 126 153 12 .350 20 Shannon Wilkes-Barre 77 347 77 121 21 .348 21 Nadeau Springfield 110 469 128 162 30 .345 22 Field Erie 109 436 71 150 16 .344 Sweeney Binghamton 27 116 21 40 0 .344 24 Campfield Wilkes-Barre 29 94 20 32 1 .340 Dixon Providence 80 320 58 109 33 .340 26 Rogers Providence 112 492 97 167 37 .339 27 Lytle Wilkes-Barre and Binghamton 101 479 115 162 39 .338 Carr Binghamton 15 71 13 24 2 .338 29 Weddige Buffalo 21 86 19 29 1 .337 Wood Yonkers 22 86 21 29 2 .337 31 Lynch Springfield 110 469 127 158 44 .336 Kilroy Syracuse 30 98 22 33 8 .336 Clymer Buffalo 121 523 97 176 36 .336 34 Lyons Providence 108 511 131 171 37 .334 Johnson Troy and Scranton 111 463 221 155 14 .334 Bottenus Springfield 110 440 111 147 22 .334 Betts Wilkes-Barre 107 463 114 155 21 .334 38 Gillen Wilkes-Barre 106 417 89 139 17 .333 Nicholson Erie 105 453 115 151 71 .333 40 Lewee Buffalo 71 262 56 87 3 .332 41 Breckenridge Troy and Springfield 113 440 98 146 11 .331 Lally Erie 108 458 78 152 8 .331 43 O'Brien Buffalo 60 276 77 91 14 .329 Payne Syracuse and Binghamton 52 197 37 65 5 .329 45 Cahill Scranton and Troy 91 402 73 132 26 .328 46 Scheffler Troy and Springfield 111 459 138 150 29 .326 47 Friel Binghamton, Scranton, & 60 251 58 81 17 .322 Springfield Pickett Troy 71 304 54 98 12 .322 Hoffer Buffalo 76 282 63 91 5 .322 50 Lezotte Wilkes-Barre 78 336 73 108 8 .321 51 Shannon Springfield 109 493 115 158 15 .320 52 Gore Binghamton 48 191 46 61 5 .319 53 Boyd Buffalo 82 339 76 105 10 .318 54 Berger Erie 67 255 50 80 3 .313 " Urquhart Buffalo 101 402 80 126 7 .313 56 Bausewein Syracuse 44 146 8 45 4 .308 " Demont Buffalo, Bingh'ton & Scranton 36 146 31 45 4 .308 " Burns Springfield 36 146 27 45 7 .308 59 Daly Buffalo 82 336 82 103 7 .306 60 Hoover Syracuse and Scranton 83 344 74 105 21 .305 61 Warner Wilkes-Barre 97 387 71 118 17 .304 62 Barnett Binghamton and Syracuse 42 132 23 40 2 .303 " Hanrahan Binghamton and Syracuse 54 221 36 67 4 .303 64 J. Hess Wilkes-Barre and Scranton 78 348 72 105 8 .301 65 T. Hess Syracuse 98 381 64 114 6 .299 66 Gunson Erie 64 261 40 78 2 .298 67 Whitehead Binghamton and Scranton 30 131 28 39 8 .297 68 Welch Syracuse 108 422 111 125 81 .296 " Eagan Syracuse 111 435 97 129 30 .296 70 Cross Syracuse 69 247 62 73 34 .295 " Duryea Binghamton and Yonkers 53 190 24 56 6 .295 " Heine Binghamton and Buffalo 50 203 35 60 8 .295 73 Simon Troy and Syracuse 114 485 123 143 22 .294 " Faatz Syracuse 25 102 15 30 0 .294 75 Donnelly Troy and Springfield 83 361 91 104 15 .288 " Wilson Syracuse 27 104 18 30 1 .288 " Pettit Providence and Wilkes-Barre 78 368 65 106 12 .288 78 Conley Syracuse 62 247 30 71 9 .287 " Brown Wilkes-Barre 54 233 28 67 2 .287 80 Keenan Wilkes-Barre 47 175 24 50 1 .286 81 Gruber Troy and Springfield 45 151 33 40 0 .284 82 Stearns Wilkes-Barre and Buffalo 76 307 76 37 14 .283 " Lehane Scranton and Springfield 99 386 67 110 5 .283 84 Stricker Providence 108 436 88 123 52 .282 " Cooney Providence 98 422 68 119 28 .282 86 Delaney Binghamton and Scranton 51 188 35 53 6 .281 87 Mack Binghamton 66 272 62 76 10 .278 88 Van Dyke Erie 108 434 66 120 36 .276 89 Leahy Springfield 101 423 96 116 30 .274 90 Bott Buffalo 18 66 11 13 2 .272 91 Healy Erie 37 137 21 37 0 .270 92 McGinness Erie 27 89 11 24 1 .269 93 Smith Erie 108 432 102 115 19 .266 94 Murray Providence 109 430 80 112 68 .260 95 Murphy Troy 29 116 11 30 1 .258 " Johnson Buffalo 51 213 31 55 13 .258 97 Rogers Scranton 21 82 10 21 1 .256 98 Kuehne Erie 106 427 64 109 13 .255 99 McCauley Providence 53 197 33 50 27 .253 100 Phelan Scranton 26 103 20 26 8 .252 101 Wise Yonkers 20 80 14 20 7 .250 " Dolan Binghamton and Springfield 25 84 12 21 0 .250 103 Egan Providence 35 105 25 26 9 .247 104 McMahon Wilkes-Barre 99 393 43 97 4 .246 105 Lovett Providence 16 62 7 15 0 .241 106 Donovan Scranton, Troy and Yonkers 34 121 12 29 4 .289 107 Sullivan Providence 40 155 23 37 10 .238 108 Smith Troy and Scranton 108 421 67 97 1 .230 108 Coughlin Springfield 49 178 26 41 1 .230 110 Messitt Springfield 82 112 20 25 2 .228 111 Meekin Troy and Wilkes-Barre 39 135 28 30 4 .222 112 Fisher Buffalo 17 60 5 18 3 .216 112 W. Sweeney Yonkers 20 74 7 16 2 .216 114 Costello Yonkers 22 86 9 18 1 .209 115 Marshall Binghamton 17 62 10 19 0 .206 116 Quarles Wilkes-Barre and Scranton 35 127 16 26 2 .204 117 Blackburn Wilkes-Barre and Scranton 18 66 9 13 0 .196 118 Kilroy Yonkers 17 64 10 12 4 .187 119 Connors Binghamton 19 75 12 14 1 .186 120 Lang Binghamton 16 59 19 11 7 .183 121 Herndon Erie 47 189 21 29 1 .182 122 Lohbeck Binghamton 42 160 20 29 7 .181 123 Phillips Troy 15 59 8 10 1 .169 124 Rudderham Providence 30 105 7 17 2 .161 —————————————————————————————————————-
PITCHERS' FIELDING AVERAGES.———————————————————————————————————P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .———————————————————————————————————1 Rudderham Providence 30 9 46 1 .9822 Lovett Providence 16 7 38 1 .9753 Bausewein Syracuse 41 14 60 3 .9604 Sullivan Providence 39 8 72 4 .9525 Campfield Wilkes-Barre 29 8 49 3 .9496 Hoffer Buffalo 57 39 92 8 .9426 Vickery Buffalo and Springfield 52 26 122 9 .9426 Bott Buffalo 18 3 46 3 .9429 Keenan Wilkes-Barre 38 29 64 6 .93910 McGinnis Erie 27 6 52 4 .93511 Gruber Troy and Springfield 45 7 77 7 .93112 Duryea Binghamton and Yonkers 40 36 65 9 .91813 Blackburn Scranton and Wilkes-Barre 17 8 25 3 .91614 Coughlin Springfield 45 19 79 9 .91515 Meekin Troy and Wilkes-Barre 39 29 63 9 .91016 Donovan Troy, Scranton and Yonkers 34 14 55 7 .90717 Fisher Buffalo 17 6 23 3 .90618 Fagan Providence 20 9 65 8 .90219 Herndon Erie 46 23 61 10 .89620 Marshall Binghamton 13 3 23 3 .89621 Quarles Wilkes-Barre and Scranton 33 13 64 9 .89522 Dolan Binghamton and Springfield 25 4 34 5 .88623 Healy Erie 34 14 63 16 .88524 Delaney Binghamton and Scranton 50 21 80 12 .88425 Kilroy Syracuse 27 20 56 10 .88326 Barnett Binghamton and Syracuse 42 4 86 12 .85227 Payne Syracuse and Binghamton 18 9 19 10 .736——————————————————————————————————-
CATCHERS' AVERAGES.——————————————————————————————————P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .——————————————————————————————————1 Lohbeck Binghamton 42 138 30 6 .9652 Gunson Erie 54 157 46 8 .9623 Berger Erie 58 180 45 9 .9614 Dixon Providence 63 241 48 12 .9605 Cahill Troy and Scranton 51 161 51 11 .9506 Urquhart Buffalo 83 321 74 22 .9477 Warner Wilkes-Barre 97 317 71 22 .9468 Wilson Syracuse 20 71 26 6 .9419 Leahy Springfield 95 321 76 25 .94010 Murphy Troy 24 83 10 6 .93911 Hess Syracuse 89 253 54 22 .93312 McCauley Providence 53 136 47 23 .91313 Boyd Buffalo 61 226 37 28 .90314 Rafter Binghamton and Syracuse 43 128 40 20 .89315 Patchen Scranton 32 114 20 17 .887—————————————————————————————————————-
SHORT STOP AVERAGES.——————————————————————————————————P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .——————————————————————————————————1 Demont Binghamton and Buffalo 29 68 117 23 .8981 Shannon Springfield 109 245 454 90 .8983 Cooney Providence 98 148 331 55 .8974 Smith Erie 106 205 429 75 .8945 W. Sweeney Yonkers 20 40 78 14 .8936 Lewee Buffalo 71 146 269 50 .8926 Smith Troy and Scranton 108 139 332 57 .8928 Cross Syracuse 69 172 275 60 .8819 Hanrahan Syracuse and Binghamton 54 65 166 35 .87010 McMahon Wilkes-Barre 99 218 402 98 .86311 Johnson Buffalo 49 70 144 39 .84512 Lang Binghamton 16 20 52 14 .83713 Heine Binghamton and Buffalo 35 75 103 35 .835—————————————————————————————————————-
FIRST BASE AVERAGES.——————————————————————————————————P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .——————————————————————————————————1 Brown Wilkes-Barre 54 578 30 10 .9832 Breckenridge Troy and Springfield 113 1133 37 22 .9812 Field Erie 109 1092 56 22 .9812 Kelly Yonkers 12 96 11 2 .9815 Lehane Springfield and Scranton 98 938 64 20 .9806 Rogers Providence 109 970 42 25 .9757 Power Binghamton and Syracuse 79 728 37 20 .9748 Drauby Buffalo 46 455 21 14 .9718 Faatz Syracuse 25 235 4 7 .97110 Conley Syracuse 62 569 15 19 .96811 Stearns Buffalo and Wilkes-Barre 76 774 24 30 .94512 Sweeney Binghamton 23 215 9 15 .937—————————————————————————————————————-
SECOND BASE AVERAGES.——————————————————————————————————P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .——————————————————————————————————1 Stricker Providence 108 341 308 30 .9552 Wise Yonkers 20 76 79 8 .9503 Lynch Springfield 20 70 59 7 .9483 Pickett Troy 71 241 197 24 .9485 Eagan Syracuse 111 364 362 40 .9476 Clymer Buffalo 54 159 171 21 .9407 Nicholson Erie 105 321 300 42 .9378 Cahill Troy and Scranton 28 75 78 11 .9329 Burns Springfield 36 104 82 14 .93010 O'Brien Buffalo 60 192 162 28 .92610 Mack Binghamton 66 185 206 31 .92612 Smith Buffalo 13 36 31 7 .90513 Shannon Wilkes-Barre 77 168 221 41 .904—————————————————————————————————————-
THIRD BASE AVERAGES.———————————————————————————————————-P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .———————————————————————————————————-1 Bassett Providence 109 183 290 46 .9112 Kuehne Erie 106 154 265 41 .9103 Minnehan Syracuse 111 165 251 45 .9024 Donnelly Troy and Springfield 83 123 207 36 .9015 Whitehead Binghamton and Scranton 30 43 61 13 .8886 Smith Troy 16 14 41 7 .8876 Lynch Springfield 87 203 223 54 .8878 Dowse Buffalo, Troy and Binghamton 67 97 146 36 .8709 Mulvey Yonkers 22 35 44 12 .85810 Gillen Wilkes-Barre 106 127 216 67 .83611 O'Brien Binghamton 15 20 15 9 .81812 Phelan Scranton 29 19 31 12 .80613 Raymond Binghamton 22 24 42 17 .79514 Weddige Buffalo 14 16 20 11 .765—————————————————————————————————————-
FIELDERS' AVERAGES.———————————————————————————————————-P A Pu s E eG t s r ra i r cm O s o ee u t r ns t s s tNo. Name. Club. . . . . .———————————————————————————————————-1 Clymer Buffalo 61 152 11 4 .9762 Drauby Buffalo 37 67 5 5 .9602 Welch Syracuse 108 225 19 10 .9604 Lyons Providence 108 294 27 14 .9564 Gore Binghamton 48 99 10 5 .9566 Simon Syracuse and Troy 114 265 15 13 .9557 Scheffler Troy and Springfield 112 175 23 12 .9428 Hoffer Buffalo 19 45 3 3 .9419 Collins Buffalo 125 299 34 21 .94010 Wood Yonkers 22 42 3 3 .93711 Griffin Buffalo and Syracuse 106 178 13 13 .93612 Lally Erie 108 239 17 18 .93413 Knight Wilkes-Barre and Providence 113 307 13 24 .93014 Van Dyke Erie 108 219 23 20 .92315 Johnson Troy and Scranton 111 312 24 31 .91516 Betts Wilkes-Barre 107 302 23 31 .91217 Shearon Erie 103 163 21 18 .91018 Payne Binghamton and Syracuse 47 58 9 7 .90519 Bottenus Springfield 110 267 6 31 .89820 Daly Buffalo 82 137 17 18 .89521 Murray Providence 108 144 26 21 .89022 Lezotte Wilkes-Barre 63 112 7 15 .88822 Carr Binghamton 15 32 2 4 .88824 Connors Binghamton 19 37 2 5 .88625 Hess Wilkes-Barre and Scranton 74 136 8 20 .87826 Nadeau Springfield 85 187 17 30 .87127 Lytle Wilkes-Barre and Binghamton 87 196 34 36 .86428 Hoover Syracuse and Scranton 83 152 12 27 .85829 Friel Spr'gf'ld, Binham'n, Scranton 60 96 5 11 .85730 Pettit Providence and Wilkes-Barre 57 98 5 12 .83031 Rogers Scranton 18 32 2 7 .82932 P. Sweeney Yonkers 17 34 4 8 .82533 Costello Yonkers 13 28 2 7 .81034 Sheehan Springfield 32 36 6 7 .728—————————————————————————————————————-
CLUB BATTING AVERAGES.———————————————————————-A B S Pt a t es o B rB R e H l a Ca u i e s et n t n e ns s s s tNo. CLUB. . . . . .———————————————————————-1 Buffalo 4630 1022 1500 154 .3232 Springfield 4004 942 1268 184 .3163 Providence 4210 842 1306 365 .3104 Syracuse 4092 814 1260 186 .3075 Binghamton 3018 585 919 128 .3046 Wilkesbarre 3949 773 1196 136 .3026 Erie 4018 751 1214 194 .3028 Troy 2775 588 821 97 .2959 Scranton 1269 200 372 154 .29310 Yonkers 735 118 220 28 .288—————————————————————————————————————-
CLUB FIELDING AVERAGES.——————————————————————————————-PP A eu s E rt s ri r CO s o eu t r nt s s tNo. CLUB. . . . .——————————————————————————————-1 Providence 2825 1357 257 .9422 Erie 2776 1399 281 .9363 Troy 1968 940 194 .9343 Springfield 2779 1286 285 .9345 Syracuse 2754 1380 310 .9306 Buffalo 3011 1442 369 .9237 Wilkes-Barre 2457 1191 354 .9188 Binghamton 1916 967 276 .9169 Yonkers 410 263 68 .90210 Scranton 794 357 138 .892—————————————————————————————————————-
#The Presidents of the National League.#
This is the twentieth year of the existence of the National League, and in all that time but four members of the League have occupied the presidential chair, viz., Morgan G. Bulkeley, ex-Governor of Connecticut; the last W.A. Hulbert; A.G. Mills, the leading spirit of the great New York Athletic Club, and N.E. Young, the present highly-esteemed and worthy President of the League. Mr. Bulkeley served during 1876; Mr. Hulbert from 1876 to his death in 1882; Mr. Mills from that date up to 1884, when business requirements led to his resignation, and Mr. Young since then. From the organization of the National League in 1876 to the day of his death, Mr. Hulbert was the great moving spirit in the reforms in the government of the professional clubs of the country, which marked the period from 1876 to the eighties. It was his influence, largely, which led to the war upon the "crookedness" which marked the early years of professional base ball history, in which pool gambling was the potent factor. It took years of cohesive and even arbitrary legislation to eliminate the poison of the pool rooms from the professional system, but success was finally achieved, and to the late President Hulbert and his able coadjutors in the League does the credit of this success belong. During the League regime, under President Mills, the great union safety compact, known as the National Agreement, sprang into existence, and its author—Mr. Mills—at this day has reason to be proud of the good work he did for professional ball playing, and for the benefit of the game at large, in the perfecting of this bond of union between the reputable clubs of the professional fraternity. The wisdom of the measure, as a protection against the abuses of "revolving" and "contract breaking," has been very strikingly shown by court decisions which oblige professional clubs to depend entirely upon base ball law, and not the common law, for the preservation of their club rights in contracting with players for their services on the field. Since Mr. Mills left the League arena he has done most efficient service in conserving the best interests of the New York Athletic Club and those of the clubs of the Amateur Athletic Union at large.
The great master of League records, and the whilom Secretary of the League since its organization, Mr. Young, is known throughout the entire base ball world, alike for the integrity of his character, the geniality of his disposition and the marked industry and persevering application which has characterized the discharge of his onerous official duties.
It is well known that "Old Nick" is frequently alluded to in daily life as the arch-fiend of the world; but the Old Nick of the base ball arena presents a character the very opposite in every respect of his devilish namesake—the one being the spirit of evil, and the other the spirit of honor and good nature. Long may he live to honor the position and uphold the reformation in the base ball world which his predecessors so creditably originated and supported.
Mr. Young is a native of Amsterdam, N.Y. He was but a mere boy at the outbreak of the war between the States, but he was game to the core and among the first from his home country to enlist in the Union service. Just before the war he appeared as an athletic young fellow with muscles that would have done credit to one as large again as he was. He was looked on as the best cricket player in the section of the country in which he lived, playing frequently on elevens which had besides himself George and Harry Wright as members. You should hear Nick relate anecdotes of his career as a cricketer. At the close of the war Mr. Young made Washington his residence, and securing a position in the Second Auditor's Department, being an excellent accountant, he has occupied his position through several administrations. From cricket he became interested in the national game of base ball, and eventually, in connection with Mr. A.G. Mills, he started the old Olympic club of Washington, and then it was that he took the field again. In 1871 he was elected Secretary of the old "National Association of Base Ball Players"—not of clubs, but of players—and in 1884, he succeeded Mr. Mills as President of the National League, which organization succeeded the National Association, which had become rotten.
[Illustration: CORRECT DIAGRAM OF A BALL FIELD.NOTE. For Specifications see Rules from No. 2 to No. 13.]
* * * * *