THEY.
Before saying a word upon the subject, I must make an apology similar to that presented by honest Andro Symson, episcopal minister of a Galloway parish before the Revolution, when, in singing the praises of Sir David Dunbar of Baldoon, he says, his muse
——’gainst Priscian avers,He,HE ALONE,were my parishioners.
——’gainst Priscian avers,He,HE ALONE,were my parishioners.
——’gainst Priscian avers,He,HE ALONE,were my parishioners.
——’gainst Priscian avers,
He,HE ALONE,were my parishioners.
As good Andro’s congregation of one required to be spoken of in the plural, so do my friendsTHEYneed to be mentioned in the singular number. The truth is,THEYis a collective ideality, a most potent plural unit, who does a great many remarkable things in the world, without ever being called to account for them, and without any body knowing very distinctly who or what he is. I venture to say, that hardly a subject of his Majesty does not, day by day, refer events and deeds to the agency ofTHEY, and yet never has presumed, to this blessed hour, to consider who this mysterious personage—this great unknown—this finer spirit than Ariel—can be. In very truth, he is a most impalpable being, and susceptible of a wonderful variety of shapes. There is no height of greatness, and no depth of degradation, which he may not arrive at. Sometimes one would suppose that he is the government itself—sometimes, only a town council. One ofTHEY’Semployments is the disposal of criminals. “AreTHEYgoing to hang this fellow?” one man will ask another. “PerhapsTHEYwill only banish him,” is the probable answer. If the culprit be not decently and humanely hanged, the people get dreadfully enraged atTHEY, and look as if they would almost tear his eyes out.Theyalso has a great deal to do in public works. “Why didTHEYmake the road so crooked?” “Theyhave put up a very absurd set of street lamps, I see.” “What, in wonder’sname, doTHEYmean by building a temple up there, like a boy’s peerie, or an hour-glass?” ThenTHEYis the author of all kinds of rumours and surmises. “They say—what say they—let them say!” is an inscription on a wall within Aberdeen Cathedral four hundred years old; and I do not doubt thatTHEYwould have given currency to scandals regarding the mother of mankind herself, in Paradise, if there had been any other lady to tell them to—or ifTHEYhad then existed. Old newspapers say, “Theywrite from St Petersburg that the Empress Catharine is about to fit out an armament for the Caspian.” “Theytalk at Rome of a change of councils in the Vatican.” Modern quidnuncs are also filled to the brim with things whichTHEYhas been circulating. “Theyare now making out Lord —— to benon compos.” “Theywill have a marriage to be on the tapis betweenSo-and-SoandSo-and-So;” personages, by the way, who claim a sort of kindred withTHEY, and certainly are of imagination all compact.Theyis sometimes admired for his power, sometimes blamed for his stinginess. “Theyused to write capital solid books long ago.” “Theyused Burns very ill when he was alive.” It certainly was bad ofTHEYto treat Burns so scurvily; but unfortunately the fellow is so utterly impersonal, that we blame without knowing what we are doing.
Theyhas a great deal to do with thenamingof things. He may be called, in arithmetical language, theGrand Denominator. Indeed, I do not believe that Adam himself named more things thanTHEY. “What doTHEYcall this place?” one will ask a coachman, on nearing a town, village, or gentleman’s seat. “Theycall it Ashbourne,” or whatever else, is the reply. “What doTHEYcall ye?” is the ordinary question of a rustic boy to his unknown companion, and so forth.Theyis also the grand censor of all things which happen in the world. “I will not do this, for what wouldTHEYsay of me?” is a common expression, when a man hesitates upon someequivocal step. He may be convinced, from irrefragable data, of the propriety of what he contemplates: but then he could not convinceTHEYof it, and, of course, in these circumstances, he must let the scheme drop.Theythus prevents many things that would be bad, many things that would be only strange, and many things that would certainly be good, if he could be convinced of it. A most uncompromising fellow is thisTHEY! He knows very well that he cannot enter into another man’s bosom, to see all the various reasons and tendencies which lead him towards the thing he aims at; but, nevertheless, presuming that he is quite omniscient, or at least fully as well acquainted with every other particular man’s business as his own, he never hesitates to give a decided contradiction to any proposal he is not, at first sight, pleased with. Many are the good original schemes whichTHEYhas spoilt, from a hasty conclusion without premises.
They, also, amidst all his multitudinous and most Protean varieties of character, is a general scapegoat for all the mischief that is done in a household. “I seeTHEYhave cracked that decanter.” “Theyhave at last made an end of the globe in the lobby.” Or, as I once heard said by the lady of a house afflicted with a breaking woman-servant, “I declareTHEYhave broken the very kitchen poker!”—a compound fracture, too, it was. Such are a few of the doings ofTHEYin his household capacity; and it must be owned that in this light he is very great, and often comes above-board. The grandest aspect, however, in whichTHEYever appears, is when he stands up as a representative of the government of the country. “Theyare going, I see, to bring us into a war with France.” “Theyintend, it seems, to resume cash payments at the Bank.” No matter whether the affair refers to privilege or prerogative; no matter for the claims of the particular officer under whose hands it ought to fall; King, Lords, Commons, Treasury, Admiralty, and Horse Guards—all melt, like mixed colours, into the single white light ofTHEY! Things may be different under the Reform Bill; but, heretofore, there has hardly been any precise government butTHEY.Theycrowns the king—signs the orders of council—passes all bills through the legislature thatwillgo through—fits out armies, and rigs fleets—makes war, and concludes peace—is church and state—Swing and the Press.Theyis a being of past history, and of present existence—a tyrant, or the people.Theyis the great despot pronoun of theworld!