While few will quarrel with the fact that Senator Bell's name leads the list, while Senators Finn and Hartman divide negative honors at the bottom, nevertheless the arrangement is not, strictly speaking, fair, although it is probably as fair as it could be made.
Senator Walker, for example, has only one anti-reform vote registered against him, but it was, perhaps, the most important test vote of the session, that on the Railroad Regulation measures. Senator Cutten, on the other hand, voted on the reform side of every question with the exception of the measure intended to work political reform by removing the party circle from the election ballot. Senator Cutten is recorded twice against this bill, it being necessary, in justice to all the Senators, to give both the votes taken on this measure. But considering the relative importance of the Railroad Regulation bills and the Party Circle bill, all must admit that Senator Cutten made a better record than Senator Walker, although Cutten's name appears below that of Walker.
Unavoidable absence from the Senate Chamber cut down the records of several of the Senators. Black and Stetson, whose severe illness kept them from Sacramento toward the end of the session, furnish examples of this.
Then again, the Party Circle bill and the Local Option bill were measures on which several of the strongest of the opponents of the machine differed with the majority of their anti-machine associates. With the four votes taken on these two issues out of the reckoning, Bell, Thompson, Roseberry, Cutten, Campbell, Boynton, Sanford, Cartwright, Black, Holohan, Birdsall, Stetson, Rush and Strobridge, have not one vote for a machine-backed policy against them. Caminetti's vote to amend the Stanford bill excludes him from the list, but as this measure was of the same character and policy as the Local Option bill, Caminetti's name should in justice be included among those of the Senators who made practically clear records. Looking at the table in a broad way, the first nineteen Senators of the list made anti-machine records. Of the eleven caucus Republicans among them, only one voted against admitting Bell to the Republican caucus.
The nineteen voted for the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill, they voted every time against the machine on the Direct Primary issue, only two of them voted for the Change of Venue bill, only two of them voted against the Railroad Regulation bill. These comparisons can be carried out indefinitely, and always to the advantage of the nineteen.
Senator Wright is twentieth on the list; Senator Anthony is twenty-first. Those who followed these two Senators through the Direct Primary bill fight will see immediately that Wright has crowded into undeserved standing. There is a very good reason for this. In the Senate, the roll of Senators is called alphabetically, and Senator Wright's name is the last on the list. A glance at the table will show that Senator Wright did not vote once against the machine when his vote would have decided the issue. He voted for the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill, but before him thirty-two Senators had voted for the bill, and only seven against it. Wright's thirty-third affirmative vote counted for nothing. On the other hand, when Wright's name was reached on roll call on the Change of Venue bill, with the vote standing nineteen for the bill and sixteen against, and twenty-one votes necessary for its passage, Senator Wright cast the twentieth affirmative vote, thus ensuring the measure's passage. In the same way, Senator Wright's vote the following day, tied the score on the motion for a call of the Senate, thus defeating the motion, and preventing reconsideration of the Change of Venue bill which would have meant its defeat.
The query is: Had the vote on the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill stood nineteen against the bill, and twenty for, when Wright's name was reached, with twenty-one votes necessary for its passage, would Wright's vote have been cast for or against it? Any person who has any doubt on the question, is referred to Senator Wright's part in the passage of the amended Direct Primary bill, and in the defeat of the Stetson bill.
It is most advantageous to have one's name at the bottom of a roll call. Senator Wright's position above that of Senators Anthony and Burnett, emphasizes the necessity of considering these tables in connection with the chapters dealing with the several issues involved. From the first days of the session Senators Anthony and Burnett gave indications that had the anti-machine forces been organized, they would have been found consistently against the machine. At any rate, their records are admittedly more creditable than that made by Senator Wright.
The Sixteen Test Votes.
Senator Bell did not vote in the Senate Republican caucus, nor did the nine Democratic Senators. Thus in the sixteen votes recorded, Bell and the Democratic members voted only fifteen times. An outline of each of the several issues involved follows:
Senate A - The first test vote of the Republican majority which came in the Republican caucus described in Chapter II, on motion to admit Senator Bell to caucus privileges. Lost by a vote of 16 to 14.
Senate B - Vote on proposed McCartney Amendments to Direct Primary bill.Amendments defeated by vote of 27 to 13. See Chapter IX.
Senate C - Senate vote on Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill. See Chapter VII.
Senate D - Vote on Wolfe's motion to send the Local Option bill back to the Judiciary Committee. See Chapter XVIII.
Senate E - First vote on Senate Bill 220, abolishing the party circle on the election ballot. Measure was defeated by vote of 15 to 23.
Senate F - Vote by which the above Senate Bill 220 was passed on reconsideration. Note the Senators who changed to the side favoring the measure.
Senate G - Test vote on Senate Bill 1144, known as the "Stanford Bill," which prohibited the sale of intoxicants within a mile and a half of a University. The measure was aimed at the low groggeries maintained in the vicinity of the campus at Stanford. It was fought by the same tenderloin element that had opposed the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill. Senator Wolfe moved to amend the measure to exclude fraternal club houses and hotels of fifty bed-rooms or more, from its provisions. The amendment would have delayed and perhaps defeated the bill. Wolfe's motion was defeated.
Senate H - Vote by which the above Senate Bill 1144 was finally passed.
Senate I - First test railroad vote in the Senate - Senator Stetson moved that Stetson bill be substituted for the Wright bill. The motion was defeated by a vote of 16 to 22. Had Rush and Roseberry been present they would have voted on the side of the Stetson measure. This would have made the vote twenty-two for the Wright bill, and eighteen for the Stetson bill. See Chapter XIII.
Senate J - Vote on the Initiative Amendment. See Chapter XIX.
Senate K - Vote on the Local Option bill. See Chapter XVIII.
Senate L - Vote on Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 4, to eliminate ambiguities from those sections of the State Constitution which prescribe the powers and duties of the Railroad Commission. See Chapter XIV.
Senate M - Vote on Assembly amendments to the Direct Primary bill. Wright moved that the Senate concur in the amendments. The motion was lost, but on Wolfe's motion to reconsider the vote, the Senate was held in deadlock for more than a week. See Chapters X and XI.
Senate N - Vote on Change of Venue bill. See Chapter XVI.
Senate O - Vote on motion to reconsider vote by which Change of Venue bill was passed. See Chapter XVI.
Senate P - Vote on Burnett's motion that the investigation into the causes for the increase of freight and express rates be continued after the Legislature adjourned. See Chapter XIV.
Tables B and C - Record of Assemblymen.
The two tables showing the votes of the members of the Assembly include eleven test votes. The names of the Assemblymen are arranged as in the case of the Senators with the names of those who made the best records at the top.
It will be seen that fourteen Assemblymen voted against the machine on every roll call, eight were absent on one roll call each, but voted the ten times they were present against the machine, while three members voted 'once each with the machine, and ten times against it. These twenty-five members, voting 267 times, cast 264 votes on the side of progress and reform, and three votes for machine policies. The record indicates what might have been done in the Assembly had the reform forces been organized. Indeed, the forty leading Assemblymen, casting 421 votes, cast only 48 votes for machine policies and 373 against.
The same considerations governed the selection of test votes in theAssembly as in the Senate. The votes are as follows:
Assembly A - The first test vote in the Assembly was on Drew's resolution to reject the report of the Committee on Rules. The resolution was adopted, and the machine's plan to force "gag rules" on the Assembly failed. See Chapter III Organization of the Assembly.
Assembly B - The test vote on the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill. The Committee on Public Morals had recommended that the bill "do pass." Mott moved that the bill be re-referred to the committee. Motion lost by a vote of 53 to 23. See Chapter VII.
Assembly C - Vote on the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill. See Chapter VII.
Assembly D - Vote on motion to reconsider the vote by which theAnti-Racetrack Gambling bill was passed. See Chapter VII.
Assembly E - The test railroad vote in the Assembly came on Drew's motion to recall Senate Joint Resolution No. 3 from committee. The resolution called for a line of government-owned steamships on the Pacific from San Francisco to Panama. The resolution, having been adopted by the Senate, went to the Assembly and was referred to the Committee on Federal Relations. To hasten action on the resolution, Drew moved that it be recalled from the committee. A two-thirds vote was necessary for Drew's motion to prevail. The motion failed to carry by a vote of 36 for to 29 against.
Assembly F - Vote on motion to strike out of Senate joint Resolution No. 3-considered under E - those sections which referred to Commissioner Bristow's report recommending that the Government steamship line be established, and criticizing the combinations made between the several transportation companies. The motion prevailed by a vote of 43 to 30.
Assembly G - Assembly test vote on the Direct Primary bill. Vote taken on Leed's motion that vote on United States Senators be advisory and by districts. The motion prevailed by a vote of 38 to 36. See Chapter X.
Assembly H - Vote on proposed amendments to the Islais Creek Harbor bill. Motion was made to amend by substituting 44 blocks for the 63 necessary for the improvement. Had this been done, the work would have been made impracticable. Motion lost by a vote of 30 to 45. See Chapter XXIII, "Influence of the San Francisco Delegation."
Assembly I - Leeds moved that Senate Bill 220 removing the party circle from the election ballot be denied second reading. The motion prevailed by a vote of thirty-six for, to thirty-five against.
Assembly J - Vote on Senate Bill 1144 (the Stanford bill), to prohibit the sale of intoxicants within a mile and a half of Stanford University.
Assembly K - Vote on the Judicial Column bill. This measure provided that the names of candidates for the Judiciary be placed in a separate non-partisan column on the election ballot. The bill passed the Senate, but was defeated in the Assembly.
The Other Tables.
Table D shows the six votes on the Anti-Racetrack Gambling bill. SeeChapter VII.
Tables E and F - Show the records of the San Francisco delegation in theSenate and Assembly. See Chapter XXIII.
Table G - Shows the records on sixteen test votes of the twenty Senators whose terms of office will have expired before the next session convenes. See Chapter XXVII.
Table H - Shows the records on sixteen test votes of the twenty Senators who were elected in 1908, and who hold over to serve in the session of 1911. See Chapter XXVI.
Table I - Shows records of the members of the Assembly on the four principal votes arising out of the fight for the passage of the so-called Anti-Japanese bills. See Chapter XX.
Table A-Records of Senators on Sixteen Test Votes
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
A B C D E F G __________________________________________________________________________ To Test To refer To do Second admit vote Walker- Local away Vote First Bell on Otis Option Bill with party Vote to Direct Bill. to Party Circle Stanford Caucus. Primary Committee. Circle. Bill. Bill. __________________________________________________________________________ Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No __________________________________________________________________________ 1 Bell * * * * * * 2 Thompson * * * * 0 * * 3 Roseberry * * * * 0 * * 4 Walker * * * * * * * 5 Cutten * * * * 0 0 * 6 Campbell * * * * * 7 Boynton * * * 0 * * 8 Sanford * * 0 * * * 9 Cartwright * * * * * 10 Caminetti * * 0 * * 0 11 Estudillo 0 * * * * * * 12 Black * * * * 0 * * 13 Holohan * * 0 * * 14 Miller * * * * * 15 Birdsall * * * 0 0 * 16 Stetson * * * * * 17 Rush * * * 0 * * 18 Curtin * * * 0 * 19 Strobridge * * * 0 0 0 * 20 Wright 0 * * * * * * 21 Anthony * * * 0 0 * 22 Burnett 0 * * 0 0 0 23 McCartney 0 0 * 0 * 24 Kennedy 0 * 0 * * 0 25 Lewis 0 * * 0 0 0 26 Willis 0 0 * * * * 0 27 Welch * * * 0 0 0 28 Bates 0 0 * * 0 0 * 29 Price 0 * * 0 0 0 * 30 Savage * 0 * 0 0 0 * 31 Bills 0 0 * * 0 0 * 32 Leavitt 0 0 0 * * * * 33 Hare 0 0 0 * * 0 34 Hurd 0 * * 0 0 * 35 Martinelli 0 * * 0 0 0 0 36 Wolfe 0 0 0 0 * * 0 37 Reily * 0 0 0 0 0 38 Weed 0 0 0 * 0 0 39 Finn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 __________________________________________________________________________ Totals 14 16 13 27 33 7 20 15 16 22 23 15 8 22
H I J K L M ______________________________________________________________________________ Second Test Vote Local Assembly Vote Railroad Initiative Option Railroad Amendment Stanford Regulation. Amendment. Bill. Amendment. to Direct Bill. Primary. ______________________________________________________________________________ Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 Bell * * * * * * 2 Thompson * * * * * * 3 Roseberry * * * * * 4 Walker * 0 * * * * 5 Cutten * * * * * * 6 Campbell * * * * * * 7 Boynton * * * * * 8 Sanford * * * 0 * * 9 Cartwright * * * * * 10 Caminetti * * * 0 * * 11 Estudillo * 0 * * 0 * 12 Black * * * * * 13 Holohan * * 0 * * 14 Miller * * 0 * * * 15 Birdsall * * 0 * * 16 Stetson * * * 17 Rush * * 0 * * 18 Curtin * * 0 0 * * 19 Strobridge * * 0 * * 20 Wright * 0 0 * * 0 21 Anthony * 0 * 0 0 * 22 Burnett * 0 0 * 0 23 McCartney * 0 * 0 * 0 24 Kennedy 0 0 * 0 0 0 25 Lewis * * 0 0 0 0 26 Willis * 0 0 0 0 0 27 Welch 0 * 0 0 0 28 Bates * 0 0 0 29 Price * 0 0 0 0 0 30 Savage * 0 0 0 0 31 Bills * 0 0 0 0 0 32 Leavitt 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Hare 0 0 * 0 0 34 Hurd 0 0 0 0 0 35 Martinelli * 0 0 0 0 36 Wolfe * 0 0 0 0 0 37 Reily 0 * 0 0 0 38 Weed 0 0 0 0 0 39 Finn 0 0 0 0 0 40 Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___________________________________________________________________________ Totals 29 5 16 22 20 15 12 25 19 16 20 19
N O P __________________________________________________________________ To Test Totals Change To To of reconsider investigate For Against Absent Venue Change of Freight Reform Reform Bill. Venue Bill. Rates. __________________________________________________________________ Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No __________________________________________________________________ 1 Bell * * * 15 0 0 2 Thompson * * * 15 1 0 3 Roseberry * * * 14 1 1 4 Walker * * 14 1 1 5 Cutten * * * 14 2 0 6 Campbell * * 13 0 2 7 Boynton * * * 13 1 2 8 Sanford * * * 13 2 0 9 Cartwright * * 12 0 3 10 Caminetti * * * 12 3 0 11 Estudillo 0 * * 12 4 0 12 Black * * * 11 1 4 14 Miller 0 * 11 2 2 15 Birdsall * * * 11 3 2 16 Stetson * * 10 0 6 17 Rush * 10 2 4 18 Curtin * * 10 3 2 19 Strobridge * * 10 4 2 20 Wright 0 0 0 9 7 0 21 Anthony 0 0 7 8 1 22 Burnett * 5 7 4 23 McCartney 0 0 5 8 3 24 Kennedy * 0 5 9 1 25 Lewis 0 * 0 5 10 1 26 Willis 0 0 0 5 11 0 27 Welch 0 0 4 9 3 28 Bates 0 0 0 4 10 2 29 Price 0 0 4 11 1 30 Savage 0 0 0 4 11 1 31 Bills 0 0 0 4 12 0 32 Leavitt 0 0 0 4 12 0 33 Hare 0 0 3 10 2 34 Hurd 0 0 0 3 11 2 35 Martinelli 0 0 0 3 12 1 36 Wolfe 0 0 0 3 13 0 37 Reily 0 0 0 2 12 2 38 Weed 0 0 0 1 13 2 39 Finn 0 0 0 0 15 1 40 Hartman 0 0 0 0 16 0 _________________________________________________________________ Totals 21 16 18 18 12 16 311 259 60
Table B-Records of Assemblymen on Eleven Test Votes
Forty Members Making Best Records
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
A B C D E F _________________________________________________________________________________ Drew's To Motion to To Return Vote on To To recall amend Reject Walker-Otis Walker- reconsider S. J. R. S. J. Committee's Bill to Otis Walker-Otis No. 3 from R. No. Rules. Committee Bill. Bill. Committee. 3. _________________________________________________________________________________ Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No _________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Bohnett * * * * * * 2 Callan * * * * * * 3 Cattell * * * * * * 4 Costar * * * * * * 5 Gibbons * * * * * * 6 Hewitt * * * * * * 7 Johnson, P. H. * * * * * * 8 Mendenhall * * * * * * 9 Polsley * * * * * * 10 Preston * * * * * * 11 Telfer * * * * * * 12 Whitney * * * * * * 13 Wilson * * * * * * 14 Young * * * * * * 15 Cogswell * * * * * 16 Drew * * * * * * 17 Gillis * * * * * 18 Juilliard * * * * * 19 Kehoe * * * * * 20 Maher * * * * * 21 Sackett * * * * * * 22 Wyllie * * * * * 23 Flint * * * * * * 24 Hinkle * * * * * * 25 Stuckenbruck * * * * * * 26 Gerdes 0 * * * * 27 Holmquist 0 * * * * * 28 Otis * * * * * 0 29 Irwin * * * * * 30 Rutherford * * * * * 0 31 Griffiths 0 * * * * 32 Odom * 0 * * * 33 Hayes * * * * 0 * 34 Lightner * * * * 0 35 Melrose * * * * * 0 36 Silver * * * * * 0 37 Beatty * * * 0 38 Cronin * * * * * 0 39 Barndollar 0 * * * * 0 40 Rech * * * * 0 0 ________________________________________________________________________________ Totals 32 4 1 38 40 0 0 40 33 2 9 28
G H I J K Totals__________________________________________________________________________________To To denyTest Vote amend Party Vote on Vote onon Direct Islais Circle Stanford Judicial ForAgainst AbsentPrimary. Creek Bill Bill. Column Reform ReformHarbor Second Bill.Bill. Reading.__________________________________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No__________________________________________________________________________________1 Bohnett * * * * * 11 0 02 Callan * * * * * 11 0 03 Cattell * * * * * 11 0 04 Costar * * * * * 11 0 05 Gibbons * * * * * 11 0 06 Hewitt * * * * * 11 0 07 Johnson, P. H. * * * * * 11 0 08 Mendenhall * * * * * 11 0 09 Polsley * * * * * 11 0 010 Preston * * * * * 11 0 011 Telfer * * * * * 11 0 012 Whitney * * * * * 11 0 013 Wilson * * * * * 11 0 014 Young * * * * * 11 0 015 Cogswell * * * * * 10 0 116 Drew * * * * 10 0 117 Gillis * * * * * 10 0 118 Juilliard * * * * * 10 0 119 Kehoe * * * * * 10 0 120 Maher * * * * * 10 0 121 Sackett * * * * 10 0 122 Wyllie * * * * * 10 0 123 Flint * * 0 * * 10 1 024 Hinkle * * 0 * * 10 1 025 Stuckenbruck * 0 * * * 10 1 026 Gerdes * * * * * 9 1 127 Holmquist * * * * 0 9 2 028 Otis * * 0 * * 9 2 029 Irwin * 0 * 0 * 8 2 130 Rutherford 0 * * * 0 8 3 031 Griffiths * * 0 * 7 2 232 Odom * 0 * * 7 2 233 Hayes * 0 0 * 7 3 134 Lightner 0 0 * * * 7 3 135 Melrose 0 * 0 * 0 7 4 036 Silver * 0 0 * 0 7 4 037 Beatty 0 * * 0 * 6 3 238 Cronin 0 * 0 0 6 4 139 Barndollar 0 * 0 * 0 6 5 040 Rech 0 * 0 * 0 6 5 0__________________________________________________________________________________Totals 7 33 6 34 10 28 36 2 31 7 373 48 19
Table C-Records of Assemblymen on Eleven Test Votes
Forty Members Making Poorest Records
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
(a) - Changed Vote from no to aye to give notice to reconsider.Was against the bill.
A B C D E____________________________________________________________________________Drew'sMotion to To Return Vote on To To recallReject Walker-Otis Walker- reconsider S. J. R.Committee's Bill to Otis Walker-Otis No. 3 fromRules. Committee Bill. Bill. Committee.____________________________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No____________________________________________________________________________41 Hammon * * * *42 Hawk 0 * * * *43 Stanton 0 * * * *44 Transue 0 * * *45 Hanlon * * * * 046 Wagner * 0 * 0 *47 Webber * 0 * * 048 Butler * * * 049 Collum * 0 050 Dean 0 * * * 051 Perine 0 * * *52 Pulcifer 0 * * * 053 Collier 0 * * * 054 Moore 0 0 * 055 Leeds 0 * * * 056 Nelson 0 0 * * 057 Fleisher 0 * * * 058 Flavelle 0 * * * 059 McClelland 0 * * * 060 Beardslee 0 0 * 0 061 Hans 0 * * * 062 Johnson, G. L. 0 0 * 0 063 Baxter 0 0 064 Wheelan * * 065 Schmidt 0 0 0 066 Black * 0 0 067 O'Neil * 0 0 0 068 Coghlan 0 0 0 069 Hopkins * 0 0 070 Johnson, T. D. 0 0 * 0 071 Pugh 0 0 0 0 072 Feeley 0 * 0 073 Johnson, P. A. 0 0 * 0 074 Greer 0 0 * 0 075 Mott 0 0 * 0 076 Cullen 0 0 0 077 Beban 0 0 0 078 Macauley 0 0 0 0 079 McManus 0 0 0 0 0____________________________________________________________________________Totals 9 28 22 15 27 10 19 17 3 27Totals from Table B 32 4 1 38 40 0 0 40 33 2Grand Total 41 32 23 53 67 10 19 57 36 29
F G H I J K_______________________________________________________________________To To To denyamend Test Vote amend Party Vote on Vote onS. J. on Direct Islais Circle Stanford JudicialR. No. Primary. Creek Bill Bill. Column3. Harbor Second Bill.Bill. Reading._________________________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No_________________________________________________________________________41 Hammon 0 0 0 *42 Hawk * 0 0 0 043 Stanton 0 0 * 0 044 Transue 0 0 * 0 * 045 Hanlon 0 0 0 0 * 046 Wagner 0 0 * 0 * 047 Webber *48 Butler 0 0 * 049 Collum 0 0 * * 0 *50 Dean 0 * 0 051 Perine 0 0 0 0 *52 Pulcifer 0 0 0 *53 Collier 0 0 0 0 *54 Moore 0 * * 0 0 *55 Leeds 0 0 * 0 0 056 Nelson 0 0 * * 0 057 Fleisher 0 0 058 Flavelle 0 0 0 059 McClelland 0 0 0 0 060 Beardslee 0 * 0 0 * 061 Hans 0 0 0 0 0 062 Johnson, G. L. 0 0 0 * * 063 Baxter 0 0 * *64 Wheelan 0 0 0 065 Schmidt 0 * * (a) 066 Black 0 0 * 0 067 O'Neil 0 0 0 *68 Coghlan 0 0 * * 0 069 Hopkins 070 Johnson, T. D. 0 0 071 Pugh 0 0 * 072 Feeley 0 0 0 0 0 073 Johnson, P. A. 0 0 0 0 074 Greer 0 0 0 0 0 075 Mott 0 0 0 0 0 076 Cullen 0 0 0 0 077 Beban 0 0 0 0 0 078 Macauley 0 0 0 0 079 McManus 0 0 0 0 0_________________________________________________________________________Totals 34 2 31 3 24 11 26 7 9 15 4 22
Totals from Table B 9 28 7 33 6 34 10 28 36 2 31 7
Grand Total 43 30 38 36 30 45 36 35 45 17 35 29
Totals___________________________________________For Against AbsentReform Reform___________________________________________Assemblymen___________________________________________42 Hawk 5 5 143 Stanton 5 5 144 Transue 5 5 145 Hanlon 5 6 046 Wagner 5 6 047 Webber 4 2 548 Butler 4 4 349 Collum 4 5 250 Dean 4 5 251 Perine 4 5 252 Pulcifer 4 5 253 Collier 4 6 154 Moore 4 6 155 Leeds 4 7 056 Nelson 4 7 057 Fleisher 3 5 358 Flavelle 3 6 259 McClelland 3 7 160 Beardslee 3 8 061 Hans 3 8 062 Johnson, G. L. 3 8 063 Baxter 2 5 464 Wheelan 2 5 465 Schmidt 2 6 366 Black 2 7 267 O'Neil 2 7 268 Coghlan 2 8 169 Hopkins 1 4 670 Johnson, T. D. 1 7 371 Pugh 1 8 272 Feeley 1 9 173 Johnson, P. A. 1 9 174 Greer 1 10 075 Mott 1 10 076 Cullen 0 9 277 Beban 0 10 178 Macauley 0 10 179 McManus 0 10 1________________________________________Totals 107 258 64Totals from Table B 373 48 19Grand Total 480 306 83
Table D-Record of Assemblymen on Anti-Racetrack Gambling Bill(Walker-Otis Bill)
F shows vote For the Bill
A shows vote Against the Bill
A B C D__________________________________________________________Assembly Vote Motion to Reconsider Butler's Motion toon Walker-Otis Return Bill Defeat of Motion Put BillBill. to Mott's to Amend on itsCommittee. Motion. Bill. Passage.__________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No__________________________________________________________Barndollar F F F ABaxter A A A ABeardslee A A A ABeatty F F FBeban A A A ABlack A A A ABohnett F F F FButler F F A ACallan F F F FCattell F F F FCoghlan A A A ACogswell F F FCollier F F F FCollum A A A ACostar F F F FCronin F F F FCullen A A ADean F F F FDrew F F F FFeeley A A AFlavelle F F F FFleisher F F F FFlint F F F FGerdes F F F FGibbons F A FGillis F F F FGreer A A A AGriffiths F F F FHammon F F F FHanlon F F F FHans F F F FHawk F A F FHayes F F F FHewitt F F F FHinkle F F F FHolmquist F F F FHopkins A A A AIrwin F A A AJohnson, G. L. A A A AJohnson, P. A. A A A AJohnson, P. H. FJohnston, T. D. A A A AJuilliard F A A AKehoe F F F FLeeds F F F FLightner F F F AMacauley A A A AMaher F F F AMcClellan F A F AMcManus A A A AMelrose F F F FMendenhall F F F FMoore A A F AMott A A F ANelson A A A AOdom A A F AOtis F F F FO'Neil A A A APerine F F F APolsley F F F FPreston F F F FPugh A A A APulcifer F F F FRech F F F FRutherford F F F FSackett F FSchmitt A A A ASilver F F F FStanton F F F FStuckenbruck F F F FTelfer F F F FTransue F F F FWagner A A F FWebber A A A AWheelan A A AWhitney F F F FWilson F F F FWyattWyllie F F F FYoung F F F F__________________________________________________________Totals 23 53 30 48 23 52 44 32
E F Totals__________________________________________________________Assembly Vote Vote Vote on For Againston Walker-Otis on Motion to the the Absent.Bill. Bill. Reconsider. Bill. Bill.__________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No__________________________________________________________Barndollar F F 5 1Baxter A 5 1Beardslee F A 1 5Beatty F F 5 1Beban A A 6Black A A 6Bohnett F F 6Butler F F 4 2Callan F F 6Cattell F F 6Coghlan A A 6Cogswell F F 5 1Collier F F 6Collum A 5 1Costar F F 6Cronin F F 6Cullen A A 5 1Dean F F 6Drew F F 6Feeley F A 1 4 1Flavelle F F 6Fleisher F F 6Flint F F 6Gerdes F F 6Gibbons F F 4 1 1Gillis F F 6Greer F A 1 5Griffiths F F 6Hammon F F 6Hanlon F F 6Hans F F 6Hawk F F 5 1Hayes F F 6Hewitt F F 6Hinkle F F 6Holmquist F F 6Hopkins A A 6Irwin F F 3 3Johnson, G. L. F A 1 5Johnson, P. A. F A 1 5Johnson, P. H. F F 3 3Johnston, T. D. F A 1 5Juilliard F F 3 3Kehoe F F 6Leeds F F 6Lightner F F 5 1Macauley A A 6Maher F F 5 1McClellan F F 4 2McManus A A 6Melrose F F 6Mendenhall F F 6Moore F 2 3 1Mott F A 2 4Nelson F F 2 4Odom F F 3 3Otis F F 6O'Neil A A 6Perine F F 5 1Polsley F F 6Preston F F 6Pugh A A 6Pulcifer F F 6Rech F F 6Rutherford F F 6Sackett F F 4 2Schmitt A 5 1Silver F F 6Stanton F F 6Stuckenbruck F F 6Telfer F F 6Transue F F 6Wagner F A 3 3Webber F F 2 4Wheelan F 1 3 2Whitney F F 6Wilson F F 6WyattWyllie F F 6Young F F 6________________________________________________________Totals 67 10 19 57 321 137 16
Table E-Records of the San Francisco Senate Delegation on Sixteen Test Votes
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
A B C D E F G H______________________________________________________________________________To Test To refer To do Secondadmit vote Walker- Local away Vote First SecondBell on Otis Option Bill with party Vote Voteto Direct Bill. to Party Circle Stanford StanfordCaucus. Primary Committee. Circle. Bill. Bill. Bill.______________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No______________________________________________________________________________Anthony * * * 0 0 * *Burnett 0 * * 0 0 0 *Finn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Hare 0 0 0 * * 0 0Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Kennedy 0 * 0 * * 0 0Reily * 0 0 0 0 0Welch * * * 0 0 0Wolfe 0 0 0 0 * * 0 *______________________________________________________________________________Totals 3 4 6 3 4 5 9 0 3 6 4 5 5 0 3 4
I J K L M N O_______________________________________________________________________________
Test Vote Local Assembly Change ToRailroad Initiative Option Railroad Amendment of reconsiderRegulation. Amendment. Bill. Amendment. to Direct Venue Change ofPrimary. Bill.Venue Bill.________________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No________________________________________________________________________________Anthony 0 * 0 0 * 0 0Burnett 0 0 * 0Finn 0 0 0 0 0 0Hare 0 * 0 0 0 0Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Kennedy 0 * 0 0 0 *Reily 0 * 0 0 0 0 0Welch 0 * 0 0 0 0 0Wolfe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0________________________________________________________________________________Totals 0 9 5 2 0 9 1 7 8 1 7 1 0 7
P Totals__________________________________Toinvestigate For AgainstFreight Reform ReformRates.__________________________________Senator Aye No__________________________________Anthony 0 7 8Burnett * 5 7Finn 0 0 15Hare 3 10Hartman 0 0 16Kennedy 0 5 9Reily 0 2 12Welch 0 4 9Wolfe 0 3 13__________________________________Totals 1 6 29 99
Table F-Records of San Francisco Assembly Delegation on Eleven Test Votes
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
(a) - Changed Vote from no to aye to give notice to reconsider.Was against the bill.
A B C D E F______________________________________________________________________________Drew's ToMotion to To Return Vote on To To recall amendReject Walker-Otis Walker- reconsider S. J. R. S. J.Committee's Bill to Otis Walker-Otis No. 3 from R. No.Rules. Committee Bill. Bill. Committee. 3.______________________________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No______________________________________________________________________________Beatty * * * 0Beban 0 0 0 0 0Black * 0 0 0Callan * * * * * *Coghlan 0 0 0 0 0Collum * 0 0 0Cullen 0 0 0 0 0Gerdes 0 * * * *Hopkins * 0 0 0 0Lightner * * * * 0Macauley 0 0 0 0 0 0McManus 0 0 0 0 0 0Nelson 0 0 * * 0 0O'Neil * 0 0 0 0 0Pugh 0 0 0 0 0 0Perine 0 * * * 0Schmitt 0 0 0 0Wheelan * * 0 0______________________________________________________________________________Totals 7 10 12 5 7 10 10 6 2 7 14 1
G H I J K Totals________________________________________________________________________________To To denyTest Vote amend Party Vote on Vote onon Direct Islais Circle Stanford Judicial For Against AbsentPrimary. Creek Bill Bill. Column Reform ReformHarbor Second Bill.Bill. Reading.________________________________________________________________________________Assemblymen Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No________________________________________________________________________________Beatty 0 * * 0 * 6 3 2Beban 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1Black 0 0 * 0 0 2 7 2Callan * * * * * 11 0 0Coghlan 0 * * 0 0 2 8 1Collum 0 * * 0 * 4 5 2Cullen 0 0 0 0 0 9 2Gerdes * * * * * 9 1 1Hopkins 1 4 6Lightner 0 0 * * * 7 3 1Macauley 0 0 0 0 0 10 1McManus 0 0 0 0 0 10 1Nelson 0 * * 0 0 4 7 0O'Neil 0 0 * 2 7 2Pugh 0 * 0 1 8 2Perine 0 0 0 * 4 5 2Schmitt 0 * a* 0 2 6 3Wheelan 0 0 0 2 5 4________________________________________________________________________________Totals 15 2 9 8 5 9 5 9 5 7 57 108 33
Table G-Records of Out-Going Senators on Sixteen Test Votes
Must Be Re-Elected to Sit in Next Senate
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
A B C D E F G________________________________________________________________________To Test To refer To do Secondadmit vote Walker- Local away Vote FirstBell on Otis Option Bill with party Voteto Direct Bill. to Party Circle StanfordCaucus. Primary Committee. Circle. Bill. Bill.________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No________________________________________________________________________Anthony * * * 0 0 *Bates 0 0 * * 0 0 *Bell * * * * * *Black * * * * 0 * *Boynton * * * 0 * *Caminetti * * 0 * * 0Cartwright * * * * *Curtin * * * 0 *Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Kennedy 0 * 0 * * 0Leavitt 0 0 0 * * * *McCartney 0 0 * 0 *Miller * * * * *Price 0 * * 0 0 0 *Reily * 0 0 0 0 0Sanford * * 0 * * *Savage * 0 * 0 0 0 *Weed 0 0 0 * 0 0Willis 0 0 * * * * 0Wright 0 * * * * * *________________________________________________________________________Totals 5 8 9 11 16 4 10 8 10 9 12 6 4 12
H I J K L M___________________________________________________________________________Second Test Vote Local AssemblyVote Railroad Initiative Option Railroad AmendmentStanford Regulation. Amendment. Bill. Amendment. to DirectBill. Primary.___________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No___________________________________________________________________________Anthony * 0 * 0 0 *Bates * 0 0 0Bell * * * * * *Black * * * * *Boynton * * * * *Caminetti * * * 0 * *Cartwright * * * * *Curtin * * 0 0 * *Hartman 0 0 0 0 0 0Kennedy 0 0 * 0 0 0Leavitt 0 0 0 0 0 0McCartney * 0 * 0 * 0Miller * * 0 * * *Price * 0 0 0 0 0Reily 0 * 0 0 0Sanford * * * 0 * *Savage * 0 0 0 0Weed 0 0 0 0 0Willis * 0 0 0 0 0Wright * 0 0 * * 0___________________________________________________________________________Totals 14 3 8 12 9 10 6 12 9 9 11 9
O P Totals__________________________________________________To Toreconsider investigate For AgainstChange of Freight Reform ReformVenue Bill. Rates.__________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No__________________________________________________Anthony 0 0 7 8Bates 0 0 4 10Bell * * 15 0Black 11 1Boynton * * 13 1Caminetti * * 12 3Cartwright * 12 0Curtin * 10 3Hartman 0 0 0 16Kennedy 0 5 9Leavitt 0 0 4 12McCartney 0 5 8Miller * 0 11 2Price 0 4 11Reily 0 0 2 12Sanford * * 13 2Savage 0 0 4 11Weed 0 0 1 13Willis 0 0 5 11Wright 0 0 9 7__________________________________________________Totals 7 11 4 10 147 140
Table H-Records of Holdover Senators on Sixteen Test Votes
* indicates vote on side of Progress and Reform
0 indicates vote against Progress and Reform
A B C D E F G________________________________________________________________________To Test To refer To do Secondadmit vote Walker- Local away Vote FirstBell on Otis Option Bill with party Voteto Direct Bill. to Party Circle StanfordCaucus. Primary Committee. Circle. Bill. Bill.________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No________________________________________________________________________Bills 0 0 * * 0 0 *Birdsall * * * 0 0 *Burnett 0 * * 0 0 0Campbell * * * * *Cutten * * * * 0 0 *Estudillo 0 * * * * * *Finn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Hare 0 0 0 * * 0Holohan * * 0 * *Hurd 0 * * 0 0 *Lewis 0 * * 0 0 0Martinelli 0 * * 0 0 0 0Roseberry * * * * 0 * *Rush * * * 0 * *Stetson * * * * *Strobridge * * * 0 0 0 *Thompson * * * * 0 * *Walker * * * * * * *Welch * * * 0 0 0Wolfe 0 0 0 0 * * 0________________________________________________________________________Totals 9 8 4 16 17 3 10 7 6 13 11 9 4 10
H I J K L M___________________________________________________________________________Second Test Vote Local AssemblyVote Railroad Initiative Option Railroad AmendmentStanford Regulation. Amendment. Bill. Amendment. to DirectBill. Primary.___________________________________________________________________________Senator Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No Aye No___________________________________________________________________________Bills * 0 0 0 0 0Birdsall * * 0 * *Burnett * 0 0 * 0Campbell * * * * * *Cutten * * * * * *Estudillo * 0 * * 0 *Finn 0 0 0 0 0Hare 0 0 * 0 0Holohan * * 0 * *Hurd 0 0 0 0 0Lewis * * 0 0 0 0Martinelli * 0 0 0 0Roseberry * * * * *Rush * * 0 * *Stetson * * *Strobridge * * 0 * *Thompson * * * * * *Walker * 0 * * * *Welch 0 * 0 0 0Wolfe * 0 0 0 0 0___________________________________________________________________________Totals 2 8 10 11 5 6 13 10 7 9 10 9