[545]Od. iv. 753.[546]Il. xvi. 438.[547]Il. xvi. 436.[548]Il. xviii. 464.[549]Il. xxiv. 49.[550]Cf. Il. iii. 182,μοιρηγενές.[551]Od. xxii. 54.[552]Il. xx. 30.[553]Il. xxi. 517.[554]Æsch. Ag. 993.[555]Herod. i. 91.[556]Enumerated in Nägelsbach, iii. 7–9.[557]Od. i. 20, 45, 77. xxiv. 479.[558]Od. v. 445. 451.[559]Il. xxi. 308.[560]Il. xxiii. 144.[561]Miscellaneous Sonnets, Part II. No. xxix.[562]Ibid. Part I. No. xxxiii:‘The world is too much with us.’[563]Il. xx. 7–9.[564]Smith’s Dict. art. Harpyiæ. On the same subject, see NägelsbachHom. Theol.ii. 12. Friedreich,Realien, p. 667. Crusius on Od. xx. 77; and Voss as there quoted, whose opinion is, I think, quite erroneous.[565]Il. xvi. 150. xix. 400.[566]Od. i. 241. xiv. 371.[567]Friedreich,Realien, (p. 677.) §. 198.[568]Ibid. (p. 220.) §. 61.[569]Smith’s Dict. art. Eumenides.[570]Fromδαandπλήσσω: Liddell and Scott: also Schol. H.in loc.Or,μεγάλως ἐμπελάζουσα, Schol. V. The meaning may be close-nearing, with formidable inward action.[571]De Præcepto et Dispensatione, sect. 8.[572]Od. xx. 70.[573]Il. xix. 85, 6.[574]Il. v. 832–4.[575]Il. ix. 569–72.[576]Il. xix. 87.[577]Soph. Œd. Rex, 866.[578]Il. ix. 598.[579]Sup. sect. ii. p.117–9.[580]Il. xx. 233.[581]Od. xv. 250.[582]Od. v. 120.[583]Od. v. 333, 461.[584]Od. xi. 601.[585]I have alluded elsewhere (sect. ii. p.169) to another possible explanation: two aspects of character may be exhibited in the two images.[586]ad Odyss. xi. 601–4.[587]Od. iv. 561.[588]Od. viii. 467.[589]Od. ix. 65.[590]Od. xi. 26.[591]Od. xi. 29.[592]Od. xi. 153, 230.[593]Od. ix. 115.[594]Od. x. 105–15.[595]Od. viii. 102. 246.[596]Ibid. 378–88.[597]Lit. Greece, vol. i. p. 510.[598]Od. x. 2, 21, 11.[599]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.II. 12, holds the opposite opinion.[600]Il. i. 606–8.[601]Il. vii. 445.[602]Il. xxiv. 33.[603]Il. i. 571.[604]Il. viii. 2. and xx. 4.[605]Il. xx. 4.[606]Od. ii. 69.[607]Il. viii. 10.[608]Il. xxiv. 111.[609]Il. iv. 43.[610]Il. xiv. 159–61.[611]Il. xvi. 646–55.[612]Od. iii. 69.[613]Il. vi. 174.[614]Od. v. 91–6.[615]Od. v. 169, 70.[616]Il. xix. 386.[617]Il. xx. 105.[618]Od. vii. 201–3.[619]Nägelsbach carries it even to this point.Hom. Theol. Abschn.II. 17.[620]Il. viii. 39. xxi. 509.[621]Il. v. 428.[622]Ibid. 370.[623]Il. xxi. 504.[624]Il. i. 568.[625]Il. viii. 457.[626]Il. i. 501.[627]Il. xxi. 499.[628]Ibid. 468.[629]Il. i. 573–6.[630]Od. i. 22.[631]Il. i. 423.[632]Od. xi. 602.[633]Il. xx. 234.[634]Il. xxiv. 525.[635]Pastor Fido.[636]Il. ii. 514.[637]Rom. i. 32.[638]Od. v. 118–29.[639]Il. i. 599.[640]Il. ii. 270–7.[641]Od. xvii. 465.[642]Heyne on Il. i. 603.[643]Il. x. 765. 6.[644]Fragm. 50. ap. Plut. ii. 415 C.[645]Od. v. 169, 70.[646]Od. v. 213, 218.[647]Il. v. 388.[648]Il. v. 898.[649]Od. x. 396, 490–5, 529.[650]Od. xi. 7.[651]Od. xii. 25, 37et seqq.[652]Od. iv. 475 and 561.[653]Il. iii. 386.[654]Il. xiii. 521.[655]Il. xviii. 165–8.[656]See sup. sect. iii. p. 201.[657]Il. v. 331.[658]Il. iii. 418–20.[659]Il. xiv. 198, 9.[660]Il. ii. 478, 9.[661]Od. v. 378.[662]Friedreich,Realien187. p. 599.[663]Il. ii. 1–4, and i. 609–11.[664]Il. v. 416, 900–4.[665]Il. xxiv. 69.[666]Od. v. 100–2.[667]Il. xviii. 166–8.[668]Il. x. 515.[669]Il. v. 711, and xiv. 157.[670]Il. xiii. 13.[671]Il. i. 521–7.[672]Od. v. 50–57.[673]Il. xiii. 29.[674]Il. v. 770.[675]Il. xiii. 20.[676]Il. viii. 41–6.[677]Il. xiv. 226.[678]Il. v. 864, 355–67.[679]Il. xv. 79–84.[680]Il. i. 44–8.[681]Od. viii. 361–3.[682]Il. i. 590–3.[683]Il. i. 596–604.[684]Il. xv. 87.[685]Il. xxiii. 300.[686]Il. xxi. 407. iv. 443. v. 744. ii. 448. v. 837.[687]Il. v. 437. xvi. 774. xv. 361.[688]Il. v. 860. xiv. 148.[689]Od. viii. 310.[690]Od. v. 212.[691]Il. xiv. 158.[692]Il. xxiv. 130.[693]Il. iv. 49. xxiv. 70. xxii. 170.[694]Od. xix. 395–8.[695]Il. ix. Od. i. iv.[696]Il. viii. 218. ix. 254.[697]Il. v. 198.[698]Il. xv. 246.[699]Il. v. 128.[700]Il. v. 183.[701]Il. iii. 396.[702]Ibid. 838.[703]Mure, however, in his History of Greek Literature, refers the origin of the metaphor to the practice of representation by statues.[704]Il. v. 777. xiv. 347.[705]Nägelsbach, i. 10. p. 25.[706]Od. xvi. 196.[707]Il. xvi. 459.[708]Od. xii. 290.[709]Il. xvii. 98–101.[710]Od. iii. 26.[711]Od. xix. 478.[712]Il. v. 488.[713]Od. xiii. 291.[714]De Civ. Dei, iii. 2.[715]1 Kings xviii. 27.[716]John ii. 24, 25.[717]Il. xxiii. 194.[718]Ibid. 144.[719]Il. xxiv. 788–800.[720]Od. xviii. 37.[721]Od. x. 306.[722]Od. iv. 379, 468.[723]Ibid. 237.[724]Od. xxiii. 11. This is fully set forth in Nägelsbach, i. 33, p. 54et seqq.[725]Od. xiv. 348, 57.[726]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.on the case of Autolycus.[727]Döllinger,Heid. u. Jud.v. i. p. 255. Plato Legg. i. p. 636.[728]Vid. Il. iv. 48. xxii. 170. xxiv. 69. and 33.
[545]Od. iv. 753.[546]Il. xvi. 438.[547]Il. xvi. 436.[548]Il. xviii. 464.[549]Il. xxiv. 49.[550]Cf. Il. iii. 182,μοιρηγενές.[551]Od. xxii. 54.[552]Il. xx. 30.[553]Il. xxi. 517.[554]Æsch. Ag. 993.[555]Herod. i. 91.[556]Enumerated in Nägelsbach, iii. 7–9.[557]Od. i. 20, 45, 77. xxiv. 479.[558]Od. v. 445. 451.[559]Il. xxi. 308.[560]Il. xxiii. 144.[561]Miscellaneous Sonnets, Part II. No. xxix.[562]Ibid. Part I. No. xxxiii:‘The world is too much with us.’[563]Il. xx. 7–9.[564]Smith’s Dict. art. Harpyiæ. On the same subject, see NägelsbachHom. Theol.ii. 12. Friedreich,Realien, p. 667. Crusius on Od. xx. 77; and Voss as there quoted, whose opinion is, I think, quite erroneous.[565]Il. xvi. 150. xix. 400.[566]Od. i. 241. xiv. 371.[567]Friedreich,Realien, (p. 677.) §. 198.[568]Ibid. (p. 220.) §. 61.[569]Smith’s Dict. art. Eumenides.[570]Fromδαandπλήσσω: Liddell and Scott: also Schol. H.in loc.Or,μεγάλως ἐμπελάζουσα, Schol. V. The meaning may be close-nearing, with formidable inward action.[571]De Præcepto et Dispensatione, sect. 8.[572]Od. xx. 70.[573]Il. xix. 85, 6.[574]Il. v. 832–4.[575]Il. ix. 569–72.[576]Il. xix. 87.[577]Soph. Œd. Rex, 866.[578]Il. ix. 598.[579]Sup. sect. ii. p.117–9.[580]Il. xx. 233.[581]Od. xv. 250.[582]Od. v. 120.[583]Od. v. 333, 461.[584]Od. xi. 601.[585]I have alluded elsewhere (sect. ii. p.169) to another possible explanation: two aspects of character may be exhibited in the two images.[586]ad Odyss. xi. 601–4.[587]Od. iv. 561.[588]Od. viii. 467.[589]Od. ix. 65.[590]Od. xi. 26.[591]Od. xi. 29.[592]Od. xi. 153, 230.[593]Od. ix. 115.[594]Od. x. 105–15.[595]Od. viii. 102. 246.[596]Ibid. 378–88.[597]Lit. Greece, vol. i. p. 510.[598]Od. x. 2, 21, 11.[599]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.II. 12, holds the opposite opinion.[600]Il. i. 606–8.[601]Il. vii. 445.[602]Il. xxiv. 33.[603]Il. i. 571.[604]Il. viii. 2. and xx. 4.[605]Il. xx. 4.[606]Od. ii. 69.[607]Il. viii. 10.[608]Il. xxiv. 111.[609]Il. iv. 43.[610]Il. xiv. 159–61.[611]Il. xvi. 646–55.[612]Od. iii. 69.[613]Il. vi. 174.[614]Od. v. 91–6.[615]Od. v. 169, 70.[616]Il. xix. 386.[617]Il. xx. 105.[618]Od. vii. 201–3.[619]Nägelsbach carries it even to this point.Hom. Theol. Abschn.II. 17.[620]Il. viii. 39. xxi. 509.[621]Il. v. 428.[622]Ibid. 370.[623]Il. xxi. 504.[624]Il. i. 568.[625]Il. viii. 457.[626]Il. i. 501.[627]Il. xxi. 499.[628]Ibid. 468.[629]Il. i. 573–6.[630]Od. i. 22.[631]Il. i. 423.[632]Od. xi. 602.[633]Il. xx. 234.[634]Il. xxiv. 525.[635]Pastor Fido.[636]Il. ii. 514.[637]Rom. i. 32.[638]Od. v. 118–29.[639]Il. i. 599.[640]Il. ii. 270–7.[641]Od. xvii. 465.[642]Heyne on Il. i. 603.[643]Il. x. 765. 6.[644]Fragm. 50. ap. Plut. ii. 415 C.[645]Od. v. 169, 70.[646]Od. v. 213, 218.[647]Il. v. 388.[648]Il. v. 898.[649]Od. x. 396, 490–5, 529.[650]Od. xi. 7.[651]Od. xii. 25, 37et seqq.[652]Od. iv. 475 and 561.[653]Il. iii. 386.[654]Il. xiii. 521.[655]Il. xviii. 165–8.[656]See sup. sect. iii. p. 201.[657]Il. v. 331.[658]Il. iii. 418–20.[659]Il. xiv. 198, 9.[660]Il. ii. 478, 9.[661]Od. v. 378.[662]Friedreich,Realien187. p. 599.[663]Il. ii. 1–4, and i. 609–11.[664]Il. v. 416, 900–4.[665]Il. xxiv. 69.[666]Od. v. 100–2.[667]Il. xviii. 166–8.[668]Il. x. 515.[669]Il. v. 711, and xiv. 157.[670]Il. xiii. 13.[671]Il. i. 521–7.[672]Od. v. 50–57.[673]Il. xiii. 29.[674]Il. v. 770.[675]Il. xiii. 20.[676]Il. viii. 41–6.[677]Il. xiv. 226.[678]Il. v. 864, 355–67.[679]Il. xv. 79–84.[680]Il. i. 44–8.[681]Od. viii. 361–3.[682]Il. i. 590–3.[683]Il. i. 596–604.[684]Il. xv. 87.[685]Il. xxiii. 300.[686]Il. xxi. 407. iv. 443. v. 744. ii. 448. v. 837.[687]Il. v. 437. xvi. 774. xv. 361.[688]Il. v. 860. xiv. 148.[689]Od. viii. 310.[690]Od. v. 212.[691]Il. xiv. 158.[692]Il. xxiv. 130.[693]Il. iv. 49. xxiv. 70. xxii. 170.[694]Od. xix. 395–8.[695]Il. ix. Od. i. iv.[696]Il. viii. 218. ix. 254.[697]Il. v. 198.[698]Il. xv. 246.[699]Il. v. 128.[700]Il. v. 183.[701]Il. iii. 396.[702]Ibid. 838.[703]Mure, however, in his History of Greek Literature, refers the origin of the metaphor to the practice of representation by statues.[704]Il. v. 777. xiv. 347.[705]Nägelsbach, i. 10. p. 25.[706]Od. xvi. 196.[707]Il. xvi. 459.[708]Od. xii. 290.[709]Il. xvii. 98–101.[710]Od. iii. 26.[711]Od. xix. 478.[712]Il. v. 488.[713]Od. xiii. 291.[714]De Civ. Dei, iii. 2.[715]1 Kings xviii. 27.[716]John ii. 24, 25.[717]Il. xxiii. 194.[718]Ibid. 144.[719]Il. xxiv. 788–800.[720]Od. xviii. 37.[721]Od. x. 306.[722]Od. iv. 379, 468.[723]Ibid. 237.[724]Od. xxiii. 11. This is fully set forth in Nägelsbach, i. 33, p. 54et seqq.[725]Od. xiv. 348, 57.[726]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.on the case of Autolycus.[727]Döllinger,Heid. u. Jud.v. i. p. 255. Plato Legg. i. p. 636.[728]Vid. Il. iv. 48. xxii. 170. xxiv. 69. and 33.
[545]Od. iv. 753.
[545]Od. iv. 753.
[546]Il. xvi. 438.
[546]Il. xvi. 438.
[547]Il. xvi. 436.
[547]Il. xvi. 436.
[548]Il. xviii. 464.
[548]Il. xviii. 464.
[549]Il. xxiv. 49.
[549]Il. xxiv. 49.
[550]Cf. Il. iii. 182,μοιρηγενές.
[550]Cf. Il. iii. 182,μοιρηγενές.
[551]Od. xxii. 54.
[551]Od. xxii. 54.
[552]Il. xx. 30.
[552]Il. xx. 30.
[553]Il. xxi. 517.
[553]Il. xxi. 517.
[554]Æsch. Ag. 993.
[554]Æsch. Ag. 993.
[555]Herod. i. 91.
[555]Herod. i. 91.
[556]Enumerated in Nägelsbach, iii. 7–9.
[556]Enumerated in Nägelsbach, iii. 7–9.
[557]Od. i. 20, 45, 77. xxiv. 479.
[557]Od. i. 20, 45, 77. xxiv. 479.
[558]Od. v. 445. 451.
[558]Od. v. 445. 451.
[559]Il. xxi. 308.
[559]Il. xxi. 308.
[560]Il. xxiii. 144.
[560]Il. xxiii. 144.
[561]Miscellaneous Sonnets, Part II. No. xxix.
[561]Miscellaneous Sonnets, Part II. No. xxix.
[562]Ibid. Part I. No. xxxiii:‘The world is too much with us.’
[562]Ibid. Part I. No. xxxiii:
‘The world is too much with us.’
‘The world is too much with us.’
‘The world is too much with us.’
‘The world is too much with us.’
[563]Il. xx. 7–9.
[563]Il. xx. 7–9.
[564]Smith’s Dict. art. Harpyiæ. On the same subject, see NägelsbachHom. Theol.ii. 12. Friedreich,Realien, p. 667. Crusius on Od. xx. 77; and Voss as there quoted, whose opinion is, I think, quite erroneous.
[564]Smith’s Dict. art. Harpyiæ. On the same subject, see NägelsbachHom. Theol.ii. 12. Friedreich,Realien, p. 667. Crusius on Od. xx. 77; and Voss as there quoted, whose opinion is, I think, quite erroneous.
[565]Il. xvi. 150. xix. 400.
[565]Il. xvi. 150. xix. 400.
[566]Od. i. 241. xiv. 371.
[566]Od. i. 241. xiv. 371.
[567]Friedreich,Realien, (p. 677.) §. 198.
[567]Friedreich,Realien, (p. 677.) §. 198.
[568]Ibid. (p. 220.) §. 61.
[568]Ibid. (p. 220.) §. 61.
[569]Smith’s Dict. art. Eumenides.
[569]Smith’s Dict. art. Eumenides.
[570]Fromδαandπλήσσω: Liddell and Scott: also Schol. H.in loc.Or,μεγάλως ἐμπελάζουσα, Schol. V. The meaning may be close-nearing, with formidable inward action.
[570]Fromδαandπλήσσω: Liddell and Scott: also Schol. H.in loc.Or,μεγάλως ἐμπελάζουσα, Schol. V. The meaning may be close-nearing, with formidable inward action.
[571]De Præcepto et Dispensatione, sect. 8.
[571]De Præcepto et Dispensatione, sect. 8.
[572]Od. xx. 70.
[572]Od. xx. 70.
[573]Il. xix. 85, 6.
[573]Il. xix. 85, 6.
[574]Il. v. 832–4.
[574]Il. v. 832–4.
[575]Il. ix. 569–72.
[575]Il. ix. 569–72.
[576]Il. xix. 87.
[576]Il. xix. 87.
[577]Soph. Œd. Rex, 866.
[577]Soph. Œd. Rex, 866.
[578]Il. ix. 598.
[578]Il. ix. 598.
[579]Sup. sect. ii. p.117–9.
[579]Sup. sect. ii. p.117–9.
[580]Il. xx. 233.
[580]Il. xx. 233.
[581]Od. xv. 250.
[581]Od. xv. 250.
[582]Od. v. 120.
[582]Od. v. 120.
[583]Od. v. 333, 461.
[583]Od. v. 333, 461.
[584]Od. xi. 601.
[584]Od. xi. 601.
[585]I have alluded elsewhere (sect. ii. p.169) to another possible explanation: two aspects of character may be exhibited in the two images.
[585]I have alluded elsewhere (sect. ii. p.169) to another possible explanation: two aspects of character may be exhibited in the two images.
[586]ad Odyss. xi. 601–4.
[586]ad Odyss. xi. 601–4.
[587]Od. iv. 561.
[587]Od. iv. 561.
[588]Od. viii. 467.
[588]Od. viii. 467.
[589]Od. ix. 65.
[589]Od. ix. 65.
[590]Od. xi. 26.
[590]Od. xi. 26.
[591]Od. xi. 29.
[591]Od. xi. 29.
[592]Od. xi. 153, 230.
[592]Od. xi. 153, 230.
[593]Od. ix. 115.
[593]Od. ix. 115.
[594]Od. x. 105–15.
[594]Od. x. 105–15.
[595]Od. viii. 102. 246.
[595]Od. viii. 102. 246.
[596]Ibid. 378–88.
[596]Ibid. 378–88.
[597]Lit. Greece, vol. i. p. 510.
[597]Lit. Greece, vol. i. p. 510.
[598]Od. x. 2, 21, 11.
[598]Od. x. 2, 21, 11.
[599]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.II. 12, holds the opposite opinion.
[599]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.II. 12, holds the opposite opinion.
[600]Il. i. 606–8.
[600]Il. i. 606–8.
[601]Il. vii. 445.
[601]Il. vii. 445.
[602]Il. xxiv. 33.
[602]Il. xxiv. 33.
[603]Il. i. 571.
[603]Il. i. 571.
[604]Il. viii. 2. and xx. 4.
[604]Il. viii. 2. and xx. 4.
[605]Il. xx. 4.
[605]Il. xx. 4.
[606]Od. ii. 69.
[606]Od. ii. 69.
[607]Il. viii. 10.
[607]Il. viii. 10.
[608]Il. xxiv. 111.
[608]Il. xxiv. 111.
[609]Il. iv. 43.
[609]Il. iv. 43.
[610]Il. xiv. 159–61.
[610]Il. xiv. 159–61.
[611]Il. xvi. 646–55.
[611]Il. xvi. 646–55.
[612]Od. iii. 69.
[612]Od. iii. 69.
[613]Il. vi. 174.
[613]Il. vi. 174.
[614]Od. v. 91–6.
[614]Od. v. 91–6.
[615]Od. v. 169, 70.
[615]Od. v. 169, 70.
[616]Il. xix. 386.
[616]Il. xix. 386.
[617]Il. xx. 105.
[617]Il. xx. 105.
[618]Od. vii. 201–3.
[618]Od. vii. 201–3.
[619]Nägelsbach carries it even to this point.Hom. Theol. Abschn.II. 17.
[619]Nägelsbach carries it even to this point.Hom. Theol. Abschn.II. 17.
[620]Il. viii. 39. xxi. 509.
[620]Il. viii. 39. xxi. 509.
[621]Il. v. 428.
[621]Il. v. 428.
[622]Ibid. 370.
[622]Ibid. 370.
[623]Il. xxi. 504.
[623]Il. xxi. 504.
[624]Il. i. 568.
[624]Il. i. 568.
[625]Il. viii. 457.
[625]Il. viii. 457.
[626]Il. i. 501.
[626]Il. i. 501.
[627]Il. xxi. 499.
[627]Il. xxi. 499.
[628]Ibid. 468.
[628]Ibid. 468.
[629]Il. i. 573–6.
[629]Il. i. 573–6.
[630]Od. i. 22.
[630]Od. i. 22.
[631]Il. i. 423.
[631]Il. i. 423.
[632]Od. xi. 602.
[632]Od. xi. 602.
[633]Il. xx. 234.
[633]Il. xx. 234.
[634]Il. xxiv. 525.
[634]Il. xxiv. 525.
[635]Pastor Fido.
[635]Pastor Fido.
[636]Il. ii. 514.
[636]Il. ii. 514.
[637]Rom. i. 32.
[637]Rom. i. 32.
[638]Od. v. 118–29.
[638]Od. v. 118–29.
[639]Il. i. 599.
[639]Il. i. 599.
[640]Il. ii. 270–7.
[640]Il. ii. 270–7.
[641]Od. xvii. 465.
[641]Od. xvii. 465.
[642]Heyne on Il. i. 603.
[642]Heyne on Il. i. 603.
[643]Il. x. 765. 6.
[643]Il. x. 765. 6.
[644]Fragm. 50. ap. Plut. ii. 415 C.
[644]Fragm. 50. ap. Plut. ii. 415 C.
[645]Od. v. 169, 70.
[645]Od. v. 169, 70.
[646]Od. v. 213, 218.
[646]Od. v. 213, 218.
[647]Il. v. 388.
[647]Il. v. 388.
[648]Il. v. 898.
[648]Il. v. 898.
[649]Od. x. 396, 490–5, 529.
[649]Od. x. 396, 490–5, 529.
[650]Od. xi. 7.
[650]Od. xi. 7.
[651]Od. xii. 25, 37et seqq.
[651]Od. xii. 25, 37et seqq.
[652]Od. iv. 475 and 561.
[652]Od. iv. 475 and 561.
[653]Il. iii. 386.
[653]Il. iii. 386.
[654]Il. xiii. 521.
[654]Il. xiii. 521.
[655]Il. xviii. 165–8.
[655]Il. xviii. 165–8.
[656]See sup. sect. iii. p. 201.
[656]See sup. sect. iii. p. 201.
[657]Il. v. 331.
[657]Il. v. 331.
[658]Il. iii. 418–20.
[658]Il. iii. 418–20.
[659]Il. xiv. 198, 9.
[659]Il. xiv. 198, 9.
[660]Il. ii. 478, 9.
[660]Il. ii. 478, 9.
[661]Od. v. 378.
[661]Od. v. 378.
[662]Friedreich,Realien187. p. 599.
[662]Friedreich,Realien187. p. 599.
[663]Il. ii. 1–4, and i. 609–11.
[663]Il. ii. 1–4, and i. 609–11.
[664]Il. v. 416, 900–4.
[664]Il. v. 416, 900–4.
[665]Il. xxiv. 69.
[665]Il. xxiv. 69.
[666]Od. v. 100–2.
[666]Od. v. 100–2.
[667]Il. xviii. 166–8.
[667]Il. xviii. 166–8.
[668]Il. x. 515.
[668]Il. x. 515.
[669]Il. v. 711, and xiv. 157.
[669]Il. v. 711, and xiv. 157.
[670]Il. xiii. 13.
[670]Il. xiii. 13.
[671]Il. i. 521–7.
[671]Il. i. 521–7.
[672]Od. v. 50–57.
[672]Od. v. 50–57.
[673]Il. xiii. 29.
[673]Il. xiii. 29.
[674]Il. v. 770.
[674]Il. v. 770.
[675]Il. xiii. 20.
[675]Il. xiii. 20.
[676]Il. viii. 41–6.
[676]Il. viii. 41–6.
[677]Il. xiv. 226.
[677]Il. xiv. 226.
[678]Il. v. 864, 355–67.
[678]Il. v. 864, 355–67.
[679]Il. xv. 79–84.
[679]Il. xv. 79–84.
[680]Il. i. 44–8.
[680]Il. i. 44–8.
[681]Od. viii. 361–3.
[681]Od. viii. 361–3.
[682]Il. i. 590–3.
[682]Il. i. 590–3.
[683]Il. i. 596–604.
[683]Il. i. 596–604.
[684]Il. xv. 87.
[684]Il. xv. 87.
[685]Il. xxiii. 300.
[685]Il. xxiii. 300.
[686]Il. xxi. 407. iv. 443. v. 744. ii. 448. v. 837.
[686]Il. xxi. 407. iv. 443. v. 744. ii. 448. v. 837.
[687]Il. v. 437. xvi. 774. xv. 361.
[687]Il. v. 437. xvi. 774. xv. 361.
[688]Il. v. 860. xiv. 148.
[688]Il. v. 860. xiv. 148.
[689]Od. viii. 310.
[689]Od. viii. 310.
[690]Od. v. 212.
[690]Od. v. 212.
[691]Il. xiv. 158.
[691]Il. xiv. 158.
[692]Il. xxiv. 130.
[692]Il. xxiv. 130.
[693]Il. iv. 49. xxiv. 70. xxii. 170.
[693]Il. iv. 49. xxiv. 70. xxii. 170.
[694]Od. xix. 395–8.
[694]Od. xix. 395–8.
[695]Il. ix. Od. i. iv.
[695]Il. ix. Od. i. iv.
[696]Il. viii. 218. ix. 254.
[696]Il. viii. 218. ix. 254.
[697]Il. v. 198.
[697]Il. v. 198.
[698]Il. xv. 246.
[698]Il. xv. 246.
[699]Il. v. 128.
[699]Il. v. 128.
[700]Il. v. 183.
[700]Il. v. 183.
[701]Il. iii. 396.
[701]Il. iii. 396.
[702]Ibid. 838.
[702]Ibid. 838.
[703]Mure, however, in his History of Greek Literature, refers the origin of the metaphor to the practice of representation by statues.
[703]Mure, however, in his History of Greek Literature, refers the origin of the metaphor to the practice of representation by statues.
[704]Il. v. 777. xiv. 347.
[704]Il. v. 777. xiv. 347.
[705]Nägelsbach, i. 10. p. 25.
[705]Nägelsbach, i. 10. p. 25.
[706]Od. xvi. 196.
[706]Od. xvi. 196.
[707]Il. xvi. 459.
[707]Il. xvi. 459.
[708]Od. xii. 290.
[708]Od. xii. 290.
[709]Il. xvii. 98–101.
[709]Il. xvii. 98–101.
[710]Od. iii. 26.
[710]Od. iii. 26.
[711]Od. xix. 478.
[711]Od. xix. 478.
[712]Il. v. 488.
[712]Il. v. 488.
[713]Od. xiii. 291.
[713]Od. xiii. 291.
[714]De Civ. Dei, iii. 2.
[714]De Civ. Dei, iii. 2.
[715]1 Kings xviii. 27.
[715]1 Kings xviii. 27.
[716]John ii. 24, 25.
[716]John ii. 24, 25.
[717]Il. xxiii. 194.
[717]Il. xxiii. 194.
[718]Ibid. 144.
[718]Ibid. 144.
[719]Il. xxiv. 788–800.
[719]Il. xxiv. 788–800.
[720]Od. xviii. 37.
[720]Od. xviii. 37.
[721]Od. x. 306.
[721]Od. x. 306.
[722]Od. iv. 379, 468.
[722]Od. iv. 379, 468.
[723]Ibid. 237.
[723]Ibid. 237.
[724]Od. xxiii. 11. This is fully set forth in Nägelsbach, i. 33, p. 54et seqq.
[724]Od. xxiii. 11. This is fully set forth in Nägelsbach, i. 33, p. 54et seqq.
[725]Od. xiv. 348, 57.
[725]Od. xiv. 348, 57.
[726]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.on the case of Autolycus.
[726]Nägelsbach,Hom. Theol.on the case of Autolycus.
[727]Döllinger,Heid. u. Jud.v. i. p. 255. Plato Legg. i. p. 636.
[727]Döllinger,Heid. u. Jud.v. i. p. 255. Plato Legg. i. p. 636.
[728]Vid. Il. iv. 48. xxii. 170. xxiv. 69. and 33.
[728]Vid. Il. iv. 48. xxii. 170. xxiv. 69. and 33.