[27]Note 27.Page 374.I vehemently suspect myself guilty of a slight anachronism here; this ancient and illustrious monarchy having been mediatized by the congress of Vienna in 1815—its territories now forming part of the parish of Hahnroost, in the kingdom of ——.
[27]Note 27.Page 374.
I vehemently suspect myself guilty of a slight anachronism here; this ancient and illustrious monarchy having been mediatized by the congress of Vienna in 1815—its territories now forming part of the parish of Hahnroost, in the kingdom of ——.
[28]Note 28.Page 399.Ante, p. 265.
[28]Note 28.Page 399.
Ante, p. 265.
[29]Note 29.Page 415.Μήδεια, 1036-9.Anglicé: Alas, alas, my children! why do you fondly fix your eyes upon me? Why beams upon methat last smileof yours? Oh, woe! woe! is me! What shall I do? For now that I have seen the bright eyes of my little ones, my heart is broken!
[29]Note 29.Page 415.
Μήδεια, 1036-9.Anglicé: Alas, alas, my children! why do you fondly fix your eyes upon me? Why beams upon methat last smileof yours? Oh, woe! woe! is me! What shall I do? For now that I have seen the bright eyes of my little ones, my heart is broken!
[30]Note 30.Page 415.Ezek. xii. 18.
[30]Note 30.Page 415.
Ezek. xii. 18.
[31]Note 31.Page 453.Since this work was published, a very important statute (6 and 7 Vict. c. 85) was passed, in the year 1843, for removing the incompetency to give evidence, by reason of any crime, orinterest.
[31]Note 31.Page 453.
Since this work was published, a very important statute (6 and 7 Vict. c. 85) was passed, in the year 1843, for removing the incompetency to give evidence, by reason of any crime, orinterest.
[32]Note 32.Page 456.When once a man's necessities have compelled him to subscribe his name to the three magical letters "I. O. U.," he is liable for the sum specified in it to any one simply producing it, though it be addressed to no one, and no proof be given that "U" means the plaintiff, (seeCurtisv.Rickards, Manning and Grainger, 46; andDouglasv.Hone, 12 Adolphus and Ellis, 641,) unless the defendant be able to adduce clear evidence impeaching the plaintiff's right to recover.
[32]Note 32.Page 456.
When once a man's necessities have compelled him to subscribe his name to the three magical letters "I. O. U.," he is liable for the sum specified in it to any one simply producing it, though it be addressed to no one, and no proof be given that "U" means the plaintiff, (seeCurtisv.Rickards, Manning and Grainger, 46; andDouglasv.Hone, 12 Adolphus and Ellis, 641,) unless the defendant be able to adduce clear evidence impeaching the plaintiff's right to recover.
[33]Note 33.Page 461.The late venerable and gifted Lord Stowell, in the case ofEvansv.Evans, 1 Consistory Reports, p. 36.
[33]Note 33.Page 461.
The late venerable and gifted Lord Stowell, in the case ofEvansv.Evans, 1 Consistory Reports, p. 36.
[34]Note 34.Page 466.Some have imagined this to be an allusion to a disclosure pretended by M. Thiers, a few years ago,after the death of Lord Holland, to have been made to him by that nobleman, of what had passed at a Cabinet council!!
[34]Note 34.Page 466.
Some have imagined this to be an allusion to a disclosure pretended by M. Thiers, a few years ago,after the death of Lord Holland, to have been made to him by that nobleman, of what had passed at a Cabinet council!!