The Project Gutenberg eBook ofThe American RevolutionThis ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online atwww.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.Title: The American RevolutionAuthor: John FiskeRelease date: November 2, 2012 [eBook #41266]Most recently updated: October 23, 2024Language: EnglishCredits: Charlene Taylor, KD Weeks, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ***
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online atwww.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
Title: The American RevolutionAuthor: John FiskeRelease date: November 2, 2012 [eBook #41266]Most recently updated: October 23, 2024Language: EnglishCredits: Charlene Taylor, KD Weeks, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
Title: The American Revolution
Author: John Fiske
Author: John Fiske
Release date: November 2, 2012 [eBook #41266]Most recently updated: October 23, 2024
Language: English
Credits: Charlene Taylor, KD Weeks, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ***
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE:Very few corrections were made. The few that were made were due to obvious printer’s errors, and are cataloged, in a note at the end of this text. A few instances of missing punctuation have been silently added, where space for it can be seen on the printed page.Several images of documents are included. Transcriptions of these texts appear in the end notes as well and are linked from each caption as "See Transcription".This text included two volumes, with separate tables of content and pagination. Both tables refer to the original pagination. Each entry will direct the reader to the relevant page in each Volume.Clicking on these highlighted texts will direct the reader back to the associated page of the Table of Contents.The topics were nearly all printed as marginal “sidenotes”. Depending on your reading device, you may see these topics as right-justified blocks or as highlighted phrases in line with the text.
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE:
Very few corrections were made. The few that were made were due to obvious printer’s errors, and are cataloged, in a note at the end of this text. A few instances of missing punctuation have been silently added, where space for it can be seen on the printed page.
Several images of documents are included. Transcriptions of these texts appear in the end notes as well and are linked from each caption as "See Transcription".
This text included two volumes, with separate tables of content and pagination. Both tables refer to the original pagination. Each entry will direct the reader to the relevant page in each Volume.Clicking on these highlighted texts will direct the reader back to the associated page of the Table of Contents.The topics were nearly all printed as marginal “sidenotes”. Depending on your reading device, you may see these topics as right-justified blocks or as highlighted phrases in line with the text.
WASHINGTON AT TRENTONBy John Trumball
BYJOHN FISKE
With Many Illustrations
TWO VOLUMES IN ONE
Printer’s Logo
Published forTHE EDUCATIONAL PRESSByHOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANYBOSTON
COPYRIGHT, 1891, BY JOHN FISKECOPYRIGHT, 1896, BY HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANYCOPYRIGHT, 1919, BY ABBY M. FISKEALL RIGHTS RESERVED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO REPRODUCETHIS BOOK OR PARTS THEREOF IN ANY FORM
The Riverside PressCAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTSPRINTED IN THE U.S.A.
TOMRS. MARY HEMENWAY
IN RECOGNITION OF THE RARE FORESIGHT AND PUBLIC SPIRITWHICH SAVED FROM DESTRUCTION ONE OF THE NOBLESTHISTORIC BUILDINGS IN AMERICA, AND MADE IT ACENTRE FOR THE TEACHING OF AMERICANHISTORY AND THE PRINCIPLES OFGOOD CITIZENSHIPI DEDICATE THIS BOOK
During the seventy years which elapsed between the overthrow of the Stuart dynasty and the victory of Wolfe on the Heights of Abraham, the relations between the American colonies and the British government were, on the whole, peaceful; and the history of the colonies, except for the great and romantic struggle with New France, would have been almost destitute of striking incidents. In view of the perpetual menace from France, it was clearly unwise for the British government to irritate the colonies, or do anything to weaken their loyalty; and they were accordingly left very much to themselves. Still, they were not likely to be treated with any great liberality,—for such was not then, as it is hardly even yet, the way of governments,—and if their attachment to England still continued strong, it was in spite of the general demeanour of the mother-country.The Lords of TradeSince 1675 the general supervision of the colonies had been in the hands of a standing committee of the Privy Council, styled the “Lords of the Committee of Trade and Plantations,” and familiarly known as the “Lords of Trade.” To this board the governors sent frequent and full reports of the proceedings in the colonial legislatures, of the state of agriculture and trade, of the revenues of the colonies, and of the way in which the public money was spent. In private letters, too, the governorspoured forth their complaints into the ears of the Lords of Trade, and these complaints were many and loud. Except in Pennsylvania and Maryland, which were like hereditary monarchies, and in Connecticut and Rhode Island, where the governors were elected by the people, the colonial governors were now invariably appointed by the Crown. In most cases they were inclined to take high views regarding the royal prerogative, and in nearly all cases they were unable to understand the political attitude of the colonists, who on the one hand gloried in their connection with England, and on the other hand, precisely because they were Englishmen, were unwilling to yield on any occasion whatsoever one jot or tittle of their ancient liberties. Moreover, through the ubiquity of the popular assemblies and the directness of their control over the administration of public affairs, the political life of America was both really and ostensibly freer than that of England was at that time; and the ancient liberties of Englishmen, if not better preserved, were at least more conspicuously asserted. As a natural consequence, the royal governors were continually trying to do things which the people would not let them do, they were in a chronic state of angry warfare with their assemblies, and they were incessant in their complaints to the Lords of Trade. They represented the Americans as a factious and turbulent people, with their heads turned by queer political crotchets, unwilling to obey the laws and eager to break off their connection with the British Empire. In this way they did much to arouse an unfriendly feeling toward the colonies, although eminent Englishmen were not wanting who understood American affairs too well to let their opinions be thus lightly influenced. Upon the Lords of Trade these misrepresentations wrought with so much effect that now and then they would send out instructions to suspend the writ ofhabeas corpus, or to abridge the freedom of the press. Sometimes their acts were absurdly arbitrary. In New Hampshire, the people maintained that as free-born Englishmen they had the right to choose their representatives;but the governor held, on the contrary, that this was no right, but only a privilege, which the Crown might withhold, or grant, or revoke, all at its own good pleasure. To uphold the royal prerogative, the governor was instructed to issue writs for elections to some of the towns, while withholding them from others; but the resistance of the people to this piece of tyranny was so determined that the Lords of Trade thought it best to yield.The governor’s salaryIn Massachusetts, for more than thirty years, there went on an unceasing controversy between the General Court and the successive royal governors, Shute, Burnet, and Belcher, with reference to the governor’s salary. The Lords of Trade insisted that the governor should be paid a fixed salary; but lest this should make the governor too independent, the General Court obstinately refused to establish a salary, but made grants to the governor from year to year, in imitation of the time-honoured usage of Parliament. This method was, no doubt, inconvenient for the governors; but the colonists rightly valued it as one of the safeguards of popular liberty, and to their persistent refusal the Crown was obliged to give way. Similar controversies, in New York and South Carolina, were attended with similar results; while in Virginia the assembly more than once refused to vote supplies, on the ground that the liberties of the colony were in danger.