[1560]“Essays on Arch. Sub.,” vol. i. p. 25.[1561]“Anc. Stone Imp.,” p. 407.[1562]Arch. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 74;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. xii. p. 97.[1563]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1564]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., N.S., vol. i., p. 322, whence this cut is borrowed.[1565]Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 179.[1566]Ibid.[1567]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 200.[1568]Arch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 120.[1569]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 236. This and the following cut are kindly lent me by the Council of the Society.[1570]Fourdrignier, “Double Sép. Gaul.,” 1878, pl. v. and vi.[1571]Arch. Æliana, vol. i. p. 13, pl. ii. 14.[1572]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 156.[1573]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. vii. p. 485.[1574]Arch. Journ., vol. xxx. p. 282, fig. 3;Anthrop. Inst. Journ., vol. iii. p. 230.[1575]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556, pl. xxxvii. figs. 8 and 11.[1576]Pl. xl. 16;Samlede Fund, pl. xvi. 12.[1577]Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. vi. p. 137.[1578]“Age du Bronze,” 1ère ptie., p. 188.[1579]Rev. Anthrop., 1875, tome iv. p. 650.[1580]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1re ptie., p. 152.[1581]“Anc. Wilts,” vol. i. p. 209.[1582]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 252.[1583]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 46.[1584]SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxvi. pp. 35 and 52;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. v. p. 111; C. R. Smith’s “Catal. London Ant.,” p. 82;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. viii. p. 208; vol. x. p. 57; “Hor. Fer.,” p. 184.[1585]Trans. Kilkenny Arch. Soc., vol. iii. p. 65.Annaler for Oldk., 1836, p. 175.[1586]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 90.[1587]Vol. xliii.[1588]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” 4th ed., p. 223.[1589]P. 399et seqq.[1590]Erroneously called a celt by Mr. Kirwan. SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 189, whence this cut is borrowed.[1591]“Ten Years’ Dig.,” p. 173.[1592]P. 21.[1593]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. pp. 350, 408.[1594]Shirley’s “Dominion of Farney;”Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 96.[1595]Wilson,op. cit., vol. i. p. 409. I am indebted to Messrs. Macmillan & Co. for the use of this cut.[1596]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 529, fig. 407. This cut has been lent me by the Council of the Academy.[1597]Vol. v. p. 82.[1598]Catal. Mus. R. I. A., p. 531, fig. 409.[1599]Rev. Arch., N.S., vol. xxvi. p. 326.[1600]A paper on “Etruscan Commerce with the North,” by Dr. Hermann Genthe, will be found in theArchiv. für Anthrop., vol. vi. p. 237.[1601]Von Sacken, “Das Grabf. v. Hallst.,” Taf. xxi. 1.[1602]April 30, 1879.[1603]Percy’s “Metallurgy,” vol. i. p. 474 (ed. 1861).[1604]Comptes Rendus de l’Ac. des Sc., vol. lxxvi. (1873), p. 1232.[1605]Phil. Trans., 1796, vol. lxxxvi. p. 395.[1606]Chantre, “L’Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62.[1607]J. A. Phillips,Q. J. Chem. Soc., vol. iv. p. 266.[1608]O’Curry’s “Mann. and Cust. of the Anc. Irish,” vol. i. p. ccccxx.[1609]O’Curry,op. cit., p. ccccxviii.[1610]For an interesting essay on the sources of bronze, see Prof. Sullivan in the Introduction to O’Curry’s “Manners and Customs of the Ancient Irish,” p. ccccvii. See also H. H. Howorth, F.S.A., on the “Archæology of Bronze,”Trans. Ethnol. Soc., vol. vi. p. 72; Sabatier, “Production de l’or, de l’argent, et du cuivre,” &c., 1850; Von Bibra, “Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 1869; De Fellenberg, “Bull. de la Soc. des Sc. nat. de Berne,” 1860; Wocel, “Chemische Analysen anb. Bronze legirungen,” in Sitz.-Ber. phil. hist. Classe. Acad. der Wiss. Wien. Bd. xvi. 169; “Kelternes, Germanernes og Slavernes Bronzer,” inAntiq. Tidskrift., 1852-54, p. 206; Morlot, “Les Métaux dans l’Age du Bronze,”Mém. Soc. Ant. du Nord, 1866-71, p. 23; Wibel, “Die Cultur der Bronze-Zeit Nord und Mittel Europas,” 1865; Von Cohausen’s Review of Wibel,Archiv. für Anth., vol. i. p. 320, vol. iii. p. 37; Lubbock, “Prehistoric Times,” p. 59et seqq.; Zaborowski-Moindron, “L’Ancienneté de l’Homme,” 1874; Dr. C. F. Wiberg, “Einfluss der Etrusker und Griechen auf die Bronze Cultur,”Arch. für Anth., vol. iv. p. 11; Troyon, “Monuments de l’Ant. dans l’Europe barbare,” 1868; De Rougemont, “L’Age du Bronze,” 1866; A. Bertrand, “Arch. Celtique et Gauloise,” 1876; G. De Mortillet, “Origine du Bronze,”Revue d’Anthrop., vol. iv. p. 650; Wilson, “Preh. Annals of Scotland,” and “Prehistoric Man.”[1611]Job, chap. xxviii. v. 2.[1612]P. 115.[1613]Comptes Rendus, 1866, vol. lxii. pp. 223, 346.[1614]The doubts raised by the late Sir G. C. Lewis on this point have been dealt with by Sir John Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 63et seqq.[1615]Von Bibra,op. cit., p. 94.[1616]Dr. Percy, F.R.S., and other practical metallurgists have shown that this view is untenable. See Lubbock, “Prehist. Times,” p. 621.[1617]Annales for Oldk., 1852, p. 249;Jahrbüch. des Ver. v. Alt.-freund im Rheinl., vol. lix. p. 21; Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62; Perrin, “Et. préh. sur la Savoie,” 1870, p. 19; Layard, “Nineveh and Babylon,” p. 670.[1618]“Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 8vo. Erlangen, 1869.[1619]Bull. di Paletnol. Ital., 1879, p. 159.[1620]Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 36; “Alb.,” pl. xxviii.; “Matériaux,” vol. xi. pl. i. 1.Proc. Soc. Ant.2nd Ser., vol. viii. p. 250.[1621]Arch. Camb., 4th S., vol. ii. p. 59, vol. viii. p. 210; Pennant’s “Tour,” vol. i. p. 63;Arch. Journ., vol. xxix. 194;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 286.[1622]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118.[1623]Journ. Roy. Inst. Cornw., No. xxi.[1624]Arch., vol. xv. p. 120 (Leland).[1625]Arch., vol. xvi. p. 363.[1626]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. v. p. 427.[1627]Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 288.[1628]Surrey Arch. Coll., vol. vi.[1629]Anderson’s “Croydon,” p. 10.[1630]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 248.[1631]Journ. Anthrop. Inst., vol. vi. p. 195.[1632]Penes me, Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 24.[1633]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 302.[1634]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1635]In the British Museum.[1636]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. iii. p. 232.[1637]Smith’s “Coll. Ant.,” vol. i. p. 101.[1638]In the British Museum.[1639]Arch. Journ., vol. ii. p. 80.[1640]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1641]Arch., vol. v. p. 114.[1642]PenesCapt. Brooke, Ufford Hall, Woodbridge.[1643]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 69.[1644]Arch. Æliana, vol. ii. p. 213.[1645]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. i. p. 306;Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 86.[1646]Arch., vol. v. p. 115.[1647]Wilson, “P. A. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 348;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 132.[1648]Crawfurd,Trans. Eth. Soc., vol. iii. p. 350.[1649]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ix. p. 435.[1650]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 376.[1651]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 44; Von Sacken, “Das Grabfeld von Hallstatt,” p. 118.[1652]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 93.[1653]“Manners and Customs of the Anc. Irish,” O’Curry and Sullivan, p. ccccxix.[1654]“Cong. préh.,” Buda-Pest, vol. i. p. 242;Engineer, March 26, 1876.[1655]Arch. für Anth., vol. ix. p. 265.[1656]Jul. Pollux. “Onom.,” lib. ix. c. 6, p. 1055.[1657]Evans, “Coins of the Anc. Brit.,” p. 123.[1658]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39; whence the cut is borrowed.[1659]Arch. Journ., vol. xxviii. p. 196. See alsoArch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 7, for an interesting paper on Ancient Metallurgy, by the late Prof. J. Phillips.[1660]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39.[1661]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sarda,” p. 26.[1662]Keller, “Lake-dwellings,” Eng. ed., p. 54.[1663]Op. cit., p. 118.[1664]“Preh. Times,” p. 40.[1665]Arch. Æliana, vol. iv. p. 107;Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 2.[1666]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ii. p. 33, vol. vi. p. 209.[1667]Journ. Ethnol. Soc., vol. ii. p. 341;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iv. p. 513.Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xxxvi. p. 146. Only seven depressions are there described.[1668]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 45.[1669]Ibid., vol. iv. p. 383, and v. p. 109.[1670]Ibid., vol. ii. p. 34; Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 343, pl. v.[1671]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335, pl. vi.; Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 392.[1672]“Catal.,” p. 78.[1673]Wilde’s “Catal.,” p. 91, fig. 72.[1674]Pegazzoni, “L’uomo preist. nella Prov. di Como,” 1878, pl. vi. 18-20.[1675]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 358, fig. 46.[1676]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335.[1677]“Les dernières trouvailles du Lac de Bienne,” 1879, pl. i. 10; “Matériaux,” 1880, pl. i. 10.[1678]Exp. Arch. de la Sav., 1878, pl. iv. 187; Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. lii.[1679]“Matériaux,” vol. x. p. 112.[1680]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 185.[1681]“The Barrow Diggers,” p. 75, pl. v. 10. It is so badly drawn that it might be taken for a broken mould for a palstave.Arch., vol. xxviii. p. 451.[1682]P. 78.[1683]Hampel, “Cat. de l’Exp. préhist.,” 1876, p. 134; “Ant. préh. de la Hongrie;” “Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1684]Wittlock, “Jord-fynd från Wärend’s förhist. Tid.,” 1874, p. 68.[1685]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 345, figs. 48 and 49. Fig. 61 shows a casting from one of the moulds.[1686]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 91, fig. 73.[1687]Gastaldi, “Nuovi cenni,” 1862, Tav. iv. 22.[1688]Vol. ix. p. 185.[1689]Mém. des Ant. du Nord, 1872-77, p. 142.[1690]Arch., vol. xv. p. 349, pl. xxxiv. 1, 2.[1691]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 93.[1692]Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 170. The cut is kindly lent by the Council of the Institute.[1693]Ranchet e Regazzoni,Atti della Soc. Ital. de sc. nat., vol. xxi.[1694]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 48, pl. vi. I am indebted to the Council for the use of these four blocks.[1695]Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 257, vol. vi. p. 385; Lindenschmit, “A. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 5.[1696]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1697]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iv. p. 148.[1698]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sard.,” p. 27.[1699]“Troy and its Remains,” pp. 82, 110, 139, 173, 261, &c.[1700]SeeArch., vol. v. p. 108et seqq.[1701]“Collectanea,” vol. iv. p. 59.[1702]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 386, vol. xviii. p. 166;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. ii. p. 128.[1703]Vallancey, “Coll.,” vol. iv. p. 59, pl. x. 10.[1704]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iii. p. 158.[1705]Chantre, “Album,” pl. i.; “Age du Br.,” 1ère. ptie., p. 26[1706]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 433.[1707]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 109, pl. vii. 43; Troyon, “Hab. Lac.,” pl. x. 15.[1708]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 3.[1709]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronze-schwerter des K. Mus. zu Berlin,” Taf. xiv. 9.[1710]Lindenschmit,ubi sup., Taf. i. 4.[1711]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 408; “Cong. préh.,” Stockholm vol. i. p. 445.[1712]Holtzappfel, “Turning and Mech. Manip.,” vol. i. p. 321;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 337.[1713]“Anc. British Coins,” p. 124.[1714]Proc. Geol. and Polyt. Soc. of Yorkshire, 1866, p. 439.[1715]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. Vorz.,” Heft. i. Taf. ii. 10, 11, 12.[1716]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. xiv. p. 171;Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 192.[1717]Arch., vol. xxii. p. 424;Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 387; “Arch. Inst.,” Norwich vol., p. xxvi. I have assumed that the mould described in these passages is one and the same.[1718]Arch., vol. v. pl. vii.;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 336, pl. iii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1719]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. pl. ii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1720]“Itin. Cur.,” pl. xcvi, 2nd ed.[1721]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1722]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1723]Ibid.[1724]“Surrey Arch. Soc. Coll.,” vol. vi.[1725]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronzeschwerter des K. Mus.,” p. 76.[1726]Ulfsparre, “Svenska Fornsaker,” pl. viii. 93.[1727]Mém. Soc. Ant. Norm., 1827-8, pl. xviii.[1728]Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. liv. 5.[1729]Keller, 7ter Bericht, p. 16, Taf. xvii.[1730]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1731]“Aarböger for Nord. Oldk.,” 1866, p. 124.[1732]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 409.[1733]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 382;Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. iii. pp. 10 and 58.[1734]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 258.[1735]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1736]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132. I am indebted to the Council for the use of this cut;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1737]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118, pl. ii.[1738]Journ. Roy. Inst, of Cornwall, No. xxi. fig. 4.[1739]“Petit Album,” pl. xxv. 6.[1740]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 260.[1741]Worsaae, “Nord. Olds.,” figs. 213, 214.[1742]Montelius, “La Suède préh.,” fig. 40.[1743]Hartshorne’s “Salop. Ant.,” p. 95.[1744]Proc. R. I. Acad., vol. iv. p. 439.[1745]Chap. xi. p. 235et seqq.[1746]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. ix. p. 120, whence this cut is borrowed;Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 184, vol. xv. p. 90.[1747]“Reliquary,” vol. iv. p. 63.[1748]Pennington, “Barrows and Bone Caves of Derbyshire,” 1877, p. 51.[1749]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 412.[1750]Page 128.[1751]Page 84.[1752]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 328[1753]Evans’s “Coins of the Anc. Britons,” p. 102.[1754]Vol. xvi. p. 348.[1755]Supra, p. 405;Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556.[1756]See also Col. A. Lane Fox’s “Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.,” inJourn. R. U. Service Inst., vol. xiii.[1757]The Bronze Period of Switzerland has by some been calculated to have begun not less than 3,000 yearsb.c.—Zaborowski Moindron, “L’Anc. de l’homme,” 1874, p. 208.[1758]See Greenwell’s “British Barrows,” p. 44et seqq.[1759]“British Barrows,” p. 19.[1760]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 348.[1761]See Worsaae inArch. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 30.[1762]“British Barrows,” pp. 32, 375. See alsoReliquary, vol. vi. p. 1.[1763]“Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.;”Journ. R. U. S. Inst., vol. xiii.[1764]“Preh. Times,” p. 73.[1765]Worsaae, in “Aarb. for Nord. Oldk.,” 1879, p. 327.[1766]See A. Bertrand inRev. Arch., vol. xxvi. p. 363.[1767]See Chantre, “Age du Bronze,” 2ème ptie. p. 281.[1768]“Habitations Lacustres de la Savoie,” 1864, 1867, 1869.[1769]See Thurnam inArch., vol. xliii. p. 494.[1770]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 497.[1771]See “Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 411. I may take this opportunity of correcting the statement that the Assynt necklace is inlaid with gold. It is merely engraved with various patterns, in which micaceous grains of sand got lodged and were mistaken for gold.[1772]“Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 402.[1773]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 352;Quart. Journ. Suff. Inst., vol. i. p. 31.[1774]See also Rolleston’s App. to “British Barrows;” Lubbock’s “Prehist. Times;” Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” &c., &c.
[1560]“Essays on Arch. Sub.,” vol. i. p. 25.[1561]“Anc. Stone Imp.,” p. 407.[1562]Arch. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 74;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. xii. p. 97.[1563]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1564]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., N.S., vol. i., p. 322, whence this cut is borrowed.[1565]Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 179.[1566]Ibid.[1567]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 200.[1568]Arch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 120.[1569]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 236. This and the following cut are kindly lent me by the Council of the Society.[1570]Fourdrignier, “Double Sép. Gaul.,” 1878, pl. v. and vi.[1571]Arch. Æliana, vol. i. p. 13, pl. ii. 14.[1572]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 156.[1573]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. vii. p. 485.[1574]Arch. Journ., vol. xxx. p. 282, fig. 3;Anthrop. Inst. Journ., vol. iii. p. 230.[1575]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556, pl. xxxvii. figs. 8 and 11.[1576]Pl. xl. 16;Samlede Fund, pl. xvi. 12.[1577]Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. vi. p. 137.[1578]“Age du Bronze,” 1ère ptie., p. 188.[1579]Rev. Anthrop., 1875, tome iv. p. 650.[1580]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1re ptie., p. 152.[1581]“Anc. Wilts,” vol. i. p. 209.[1582]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 252.[1583]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 46.[1584]SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxvi. pp. 35 and 52;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. v. p. 111; C. R. Smith’s “Catal. London Ant.,” p. 82;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. viii. p. 208; vol. x. p. 57; “Hor. Fer.,” p. 184.[1585]Trans. Kilkenny Arch. Soc., vol. iii. p. 65.Annaler for Oldk., 1836, p. 175.[1586]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 90.[1587]Vol. xliii.[1588]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” 4th ed., p. 223.[1589]P. 399et seqq.[1590]Erroneously called a celt by Mr. Kirwan. SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 189, whence this cut is borrowed.[1591]“Ten Years’ Dig.,” p. 173.[1592]P. 21.[1593]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. pp. 350, 408.[1594]Shirley’s “Dominion of Farney;”Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 96.[1595]Wilson,op. cit., vol. i. p. 409. I am indebted to Messrs. Macmillan & Co. for the use of this cut.[1596]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 529, fig. 407. This cut has been lent me by the Council of the Academy.[1597]Vol. v. p. 82.[1598]Catal. Mus. R. I. A., p. 531, fig. 409.[1599]Rev. Arch., N.S., vol. xxvi. p. 326.[1600]A paper on “Etruscan Commerce with the North,” by Dr. Hermann Genthe, will be found in theArchiv. für Anthrop., vol. vi. p. 237.[1601]Von Sacken, “Das Grabf. v. Hallst.,” Taf. xxi. 1.[1602]April 30, 1879.[1603]Percy’s “Metallurgy,” vol. i. p. 474 (ed. 1861).[1604]Comptes Rendus de l’Ac. des Sc., vol. lxxvi. (1873), p. 1232.[1605]Phil. Trans., 1796, vol. lxxxvi. p. 395.[1606]Chantre, “L’Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62.[1607]J. A. Phillips,Q. J. Chem. Soc., vol. iv. p. 266.[1608]O’Curry’s “Mann. and Cust. of the Anc. Irish,” vol. i. p. ccccxx.[1609]O’Curry,op. cit., p. ccccxviii.[1610]For an interesting essay on the sources of bronze, see Prof. Sullivan in the Introduction to O’Curry’s “Manners and Customs of the Ancient Irish,” p. ccccvii. See also H. H. Howorth, F.S.A., on the “Archæology of Bronze,”Trans. Ethnol. Soc., vol. vi. p. 72; Sabatier, “Production de l’or, de l’argent, et du cuivre,” &c., 1850; Von Bibra, “Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 1869; De Fellenberg, “Bull. de la Soc. des Sc. nat. de Berne,” 1860; Wocel, “Chemische Analysen anb. Bronze legirungen,” in Sitz.-Ber. phil. hist. Classe. Acad. der Wiss. Wien. Bd. xvi. 169; “Kelternes, Germanernes og Slavernes Bronzer,” inAntiq. Tidskrift., 1852-54, p. 206; Morlot, “Les Métaux dans l’Age du Bronze,”Mém. Soc. Ant. du Nord, 1866-71, p. 23; Wibel, “Die Cultur der Bronze-Zeit Nord und Mittel Europas,” 1865; Von Cohausen’s Review of Wibel,Archiv. für Anth., vol. i. p. 320, vol. iii. p. 37; Lubbock, “Prehistoric Times,” p. 59et seqq.; Zaborowski-Moindron, “L’Ancienneté de l’Homme,” 1874; Dr. C. F. Wiberg, “Einfluss der Etrusker und Griechen auf die Bronze Cultur,”Arch. für Anth., vol. iv. p. 11; Troyon, “Monuments de l’Ant. dans l’Europe barbare,” 1868; De Rougemont, “L’Age du Bronze,” 1866; A. Bertrand, “Arch. Celtique et Gauloise,” 1876; G. De Mortillet, “Origine du Bronze,”Revue d’Anthrop., vol. iv. p. 650; Wilson, “Preh. Annals of Scotland,” and “Prehistoric Man.”[1611]Job, chap. xxviii. v. 2.[1612]P. 115.[1613]Comptes Rendus, 1866, vol. lxii. pp. 223, 346.[1614]The doubts raised by the late Sir G. C. Lewis on this point have been dealt with by Sir John Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 63et seqq.[1615]Von Bibra,op. cit., p. 94.[1616]Dr. Percy, F.R.S., and other practical metallurgists have shown that this view is untenable. See Lubbock, “Prehist. Times,” p. 621.[1617]Annales for Oldk., 1852, p. 249;Jahrbüch. des Ver. v. Alt.-freund im Rheinl., vol. lix. p. 21; Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62; Perrin, “Et. préh. sur la Savoie,” 1870, p. 19; Layard, “Nineveh and Babylon,” p. 670.[1618]“Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 8vo. Erlangen, 1869.[1619]Bull. di Paletnol. Ital., 1879, p. 159.[1620]Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 36; “Alb.,” pl. xxviii.; “Matériaux,” vol. xi. pl. i. 1.Proc. Soc. Ant.2nd Ser., vol. viii. p. 250.[1621]Arch. Camb., 4th S., vol. ii. p. 59, vol. viii. p. 210; Pennant’s “Tour,” vol. i. p. 63;Arch. Journ., vol. xxix. 194;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 286.[1622]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118.[1623]Journ. Roy. Inst. Cornw., No. xxi.[1624]Arch., vol. xv. p. 120 (Leland).[1625]Arch., vol. xvi. p. 363.[1626]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. v. p. 427.[1627]Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 288.[1628]Surrey Arch. Coll., vol. vi.[1629]Anderson’s “Croydon,” p. 10.[1630]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 248.[1631]Journ. Anthrop. Inst., vol. vi. p. 195.[1632]Penes me, Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 24.[1633]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 302.[1634]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1635]In the British Museum.[1636]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. iii. p. 232.[1637]Smith’s “Coll. Ant.,” vol. i. p. 101.[1638]In the British Museum.[1639]Arch. Journ., vol. ii. p. 80.[1640]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1641]Arch., vol. v. p. 114.[1642]PenesCapt. Brooke, Ufford Hall, Woodbridge.[1643]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 69.[1644]Arch. Æliana, vol. ii. p. 213.[1645]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. i. p. 306;Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 86.[1646]Arch., vol. v. p. 115.[1647]Wilson, “P. A. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 348;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 132.[1648]Crawfurd,Trans. Eth. Soc., vol. iii. p. 350.[1649]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ix. p. 435.[1650]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 376.[1651]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 44; Von Sacken, “Das Grabfeld von Hallstatt,” p. 118.[1652]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 93.[1653]“Manners and Customs of the Anc. Irish,” O’Curry and Sullivan, p. ccccxix.[1654]“Cong. préh.,” Buda-Pest, vol. i. p. 242;Engineer, March 26, 1876.[1655]Arch. für Anth., vol. ix. p. 265.[1656]Jul. Pollux. “Onom.,” lib. ix. c. 6, p. 1055.[1657]Evans, “Coins of the Anc. Brit.,” p. 123.[1658]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39; whence the cut is borrowed.[1659]Arch. Journ., vol. xxviii. p. 196. See alsoArch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 7, for an interesting paper on Ancient Metallurgy, by the late Prof. J. Phillips.[1660]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39.[1661]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sarda,” p. 26.[1662]Keller, “Lake-dwellings,” Eng. ed., p. 54.[1663]Op. cit., p. 118.[1664]“Preh. Times,” p. 40.[1665]Arch. Æliana, vol. iv. p. 107;Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 2.[1666]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ii. p. 33, vol. vi. p. 209.[1667]Journ. Ethnol. Soc., vol. ii. p. 341;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iv. p. 513.Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xxxvi. p. 146. Only seven depressions are there described.[1668]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 45.[1669]Ibid., vol. iv. p. 383, and v. p. 109.[1670]Ibid., vol. ii. p. 34; Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 343, pl. v.[1671]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335, pl. vi.; Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 392.[1672]“Catal.,” p. 78.[1673]Wilde’s “Catal.,” p. 91, fig. 72.[1674]Pegazzoni, “L’uomo preist. nella Prov. di Como,” 1878, pl. vi. 18-20.[1675]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 358, fig. 46.[1676]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335.[1677]“Les dernières trouvailles du Lac de Bienne,” 1879, pl. i. 10; “Matériaux,” 1880, pl. i. 10.[1678]Exp. Arch. de la Sav., 1878, pl. iv. 187; Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. lii.[1679]“Matériaux,” vol. x. p. 112.[1680]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 185.[1681]“The Barrow Diggers,” p. 75, pl. v. 10. It is so badly drawn that it might be taken for a broken mould for a palstave.Arch., vol. xxviii. p. 451.[1682]P. 78.[1683]Hampel, “Cat. de l’Exp. préhist.,” 1876, p. 134; “Ant. préh. de la Hongrie;” “Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1684]Wittlock, “Jord-fynd från Wärend’s förhist. Tid.,” 1874, p. 68.[1685]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 345, figs. 48 and 49. Fig. 61 shows a casting from one of the moulds.[1686]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 91, fig. 73.[1687]Gastaldi, “Nuovi cenni,” 1862, Tav. iv. 22.[1688]Vol. ix. p. 185.[1689]Mém. des Ant. du Nord, 1872-77, p. 142.[1690]Arch., vol. xv. p. 349, pl. xxxiv. 1, 2.[1691]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 93.[1692]Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 170. The cut is kindly lent by the Council of the Institute.[1693]Ranchet e Regazzoni,Atti della Soc. Ital. de sc. nat., vol. xxi.[1694]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 48, pl. vi. I am indebted to the Council for the use of these four blocks.[1695]Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 257, vol. vi. p. 385; Lindenschmit, “A. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 5.[1696]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1697]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iv. p. 148.[1698]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sard.,” p. 27.[1699]“Troy and its Remains,” pp. 82, 110, 139, 173, 261, &c.[1700]SeeArch., vol. v. p. 108et seqq.[1701]“Collectanea,” vol. iv. p. 59.[1702]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 386, vol. xviii. p. 166;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. ii. p. 128.[1703]Vallancey, “Coll.,” vol. iv. p. 59, pl. x. 10.[1704]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iii. p. 158.[1705]Chantre, “Album,” pl. i.; “Age du Br.,” 1ère. ptie., p. 26[1706]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 433.[1707]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 109, pl. vii. 43; Troyon, “Hab. Lac.,” pl. x. 15.[1708]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 3.[1709]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronze-schwerter des K. Mus. zu Berlin,” Taf. xiv. 9.[1710]Lindenschmit,ubi sup., Taf. i. 4.[1711]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 408; “Cong. préh.,” Stockholm vol. i. p. 445.[1712]Holtzappfel, “Turning and Mech. Manip.,” vol. i. p. 321;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 337.[1713]“Anc. British Coins,” p. 124.[1714]Proc. Geol. and Polyt. Soc. of Yorkshire, 1866, p. 439.[1715]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. Vorz.,” Heft. i. Taf. ii. 10, 11, 12.[1716]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. xiv. p. 171;Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 192.[1717]Arch., vol. xxii. p. 424;Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 387; “Arch. Inst.,” Norwich vol., p. xxvi. I have assumed that the mould described in these passages is one and the same.[1718]Arch., vol. v. pl. vii.;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 336, pl. iii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1719]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. pl. ii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1720]“Itin. Cur.,” pl. xcvi, 2nd ed.[1721]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1722]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1723]Ibid.[1724]“Surrey Arch. Soc. Coll.,” vol. vi.[1725]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronzeschwerter des K. Mus.,” p. 76.[1726]Ulfsparre, “Svenska Fornsaker,” pl. viii. 93.[1727]Mém. Soc. Ant. Norm., 1827-8, pl. xviii.[1728]Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. liv. 5.[1729]Keller, 7ter Bericht, p. 16, Taf. xvii.[1730]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1731]“Aarböger for Nord. Oldk.,” 1866, p. 124.[1732]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 409.[1733]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 382;Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. iii. pp. 10 and 58.[1734]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 258.[1735]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1736]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132. I am indebted to the Council for the use of this cut;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1737]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118, pl. ii.[1738]Journ. Roy. Inst, of Cornwall, No. xxi. fig. 4.[1739]“Petit Album,” pl. xxv. 6.[1740]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 260.[1741]Worsaae, “Nord. Olds.,” figs. 213, 214.[1742]Montelius, “La Suède préh.,” fig. 40.[1743]Hartshorne’s “Salop. Ant.,” p. 95.[1744]Proc. R. I. Acad., vol. iv. p. 439.[1745]Chap. xi. p. 235et seqq.[1746]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. ix. p. 120, whence this cut is borrowed;Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 184, vol. xv. p. 90.[1747]“Reliquary,” vol. iv. p. 63.[1748]Pennington, “Barrows and Bone Caves of Derbyshire,” 1877, p. 51.[1749]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 412.[1750]Page 128.[1751]Page 84.[1752]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 328[1753]Evans’s “Coins of the Anc. Britons,” p. 102.[1754]Vol. xvi. p. 348.[1755]Supra, p. 405;Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556.[1756]See also Col. A. Lane Fox’s “Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.,” inJourn. R. U. Service Inst., vol. xiii.[1757]The Bronze Period of Switzerland has by some been calculated to have begun not less than 3,000 yearsb.c.—Zaborowski Moindron, “L’Anc. de l’homme,” 1874, p. 208.[1758]See Greenwell’s “British Barrows,” p. 44et seqq.[1759]“British Barrows,” p. 19.[1760]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 348.[1761]See Worsaae inArch. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 30.[1762]“British Barrows,” pp. 32, 375. See alsoReliquary, vol. vi. p. 1.[1763]“Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.;”Journ. R. U. S. Inst., vol. xiii.[1764]“Preh. Times,” p. 73.[1765]Worsaae, in “Aarb. for Nord. Oldk.,” 1879, p. 327.[1766]See A. Bertrand inRev. Arch., vol. xxvi. p. 363.[1767]See Chantre, “Age du Bronze,” 2ème ptie. p. 281.[1768]“Habitations Lacustres de la Savoie,” 1864, 1867, 1869.[1769]See Thurnam inArch., vol. xliii. p. 494.[1770]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 497.[1771]See “Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 411. I may take this opportunity of correcting the statement that the Assynt necklace is inlaid with gold. It is merely engraved with various patterns, in which micaceous grains of sand got lodged and were mistaken for gold.[1772]“Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 402.[1773]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 352;Quart. Journ. Suff. Inst., vol. i. p. 31.[1774]See also Rolleston’s App. to “British Barrows;” Lubbock’s “Prehist. Times;” Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” &c., &c.
[1560]“Essays on Arch. Sub.,” vol. i. p. 25.[1561]“Anc. Stone Imp.,” p. 407.[1562]Arch. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 74;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. xii. p. 97.[1563]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1564]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., N.S., vol. i., p. 322, whence this cut is borrowed.[1565]Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 179.[1566]Ibid.[1567]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 200.[1568]Arch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 120.[1569]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 236. This and the following cut are kindly lent me by the Council of the Society.[1570]Fourdrignier, “Double Sép. Gaul.,” 1878, pl. v. and vi.[1571]Arch. Æliana, vol. i. p. 13, pl. ii. 14.[1572]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 156.[1573]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. vii. p. 485.[1574]Arch. Journ., vol. xxx. p. 282, fig. 3;Anthrop. Inst. Journ., vol. iii. p. 230.[1575]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556, pl. xxxvii. figs. 8 and 11.[1576]Pl. xl. 16;Samlede Fund, pl. xvi. 12.[1577]Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. vi. p. 137.[1578]“Age du Bronze,” 1ère ptie., p. 188.[1579]Rev. Anthrop., 1875, tome iv. p. 650.[1580]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1re ptie., p. 152.[1581]“Anc. Wilts,” vol. i. p. 209.[1582]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 252.[1583]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 46.[1584]SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxvi. pp. 35 and 52;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. v. p. 111; C. R. Smith’s “Catal. London Ant.,” p. 82;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. viii. p. 208; vol. x. p. 57; “Hor. Fer.,” p. 184.[1585]Trans. Kilkenny Arch. Soc., vol. iii. p. 65.Annaler for Oldk., 1836, p. 175.[1586]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 90.[1587]Vol. xliii.[1588]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” 4th ed., p. 223.[1589]P. 399et seqq.[1590]Erroneously called a celt by Mr. Kirwan. SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 189, whence this cut is borrowed.[1591]“Ten Years’ Dig.,” p. 173.[1592]P. 21.[1593]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. pp. 350, 408.[1594]Shirley’s “Dominion of Farney;”Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 96.[1595]Wilson,op. cit., vol. i. p. 409. I am indebted to Messrs. Macmillan & Co. for the use of this cut.[1596]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 529, fig. 407. This cut has been lent me by the Council of the Academy.[1597]Vol. v. p. 82.[1598]Catal. Mus. R. I. A., p. 531, fig. 409.[1599]Rev. Arch., N.S., vol. xxvi. p. 326.[1600]A paper on “Etruscan Commerce with the North,” by Dr. Hermann Genthe, will be found in theArchiv. für Anthrop., vol. vi. p. 237.[1601]Von Sacken, “Das Grabf. v. Hallst.,” Taf. xxi. 1.[1602]April 30, 1879.[1603]Percy’s “Metallurgy,” vol. i. p. 474 (ed. 1861).[1604]Comptes Rendus de l’Ac. des Sc., vol. lxxvi. (1873), p. 1232.[1605]Phil. Trans., 1796, vol. lxxxvi. p. 395.[1606]Chantre, “L’Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62.[1607]J. A. Phillips,Q. J. Chem. Soc., vol. iv. p. 266.[1608]O’Curry’s “Mann. and Cust. of the Anc. Irish,” vol. i. p. ccccxx.[1609]O’Curry,op. cit., p. ccccxviii.[1610]For an interesting essay on the sources of bronze, see Prof. Sullivan in the Introduction to O’Curry’s “Manners and Customs of the Ancient Irish,” p. ccccvii. See also H. H. Howorth, F.S.A., on the “Archæology of Bronze,”Trans. Ethnol. Soc., vol. vi. p. 72; Sabatier, “Production de l’or, de l’argent, et du cuivre,” &c., 1850; Von Bibra, “Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 1869; De Fellenberg, “Bull. de la Soc. des Sc. nat. de Berne,” 1860; Wocel, “Chemische Analysen anb. Bronze legirungen,” in Sitz.-Ber. phil. hist. Classe. Acad. der Wiss. Wien. Bd. xvi. 169; “Kelternes, Germanernes og Slavernes Bronzer,” inAntiq. Tidskrift., 1852-54, p. 206; Morlot, “Les Métaux dans l’Age du Bronze,”Mém. Soc. Ant. du Nord, 1866-71, p. 23; Wibel, “Die Cultur der Bronze-Zeit Nord und Mittel Europas,” 1865; Von Cohausen’s Review of Wibel,Archiv. für Anth., vol. i. p. 320, vol. iii. p. 37; Lubbock, “Prehistoric Times,” p. 59et seqq.; Zaborowski-Moindron, “L’Ancienneté de l’Homme,” 1874; Dr. C. F. Wiberg, “Einfluss der Etrusker und Griechen auf die Bronze Cultur,”Arch. für Anth., vol. iv. p. 11; Troyon, “Monuments de l’Ant. dans l’Europe barbare,” 1868; De Rougemont, “L’Age du Bronze,” 1866; A. Bertrand, “Arch. Celtique et Gauloise,” 1876; G. De Mortillet, “Origine du Bronze,”Revue d’Anthrop., vol. iv. p. 650; Wilson, “Preh. Annals of Scotland,” and “Prehistoric Man.”[1611]Job, chap. xxviii. v. 2.[1612]P. 115.[1613]Comptes Rendus, 1866, vol. lxii. pp. 223, 346.[1614]The doubts raised by the late Sir G. C. Lewis on this point have been dealt with by Sir John Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 63et seqq.[1615]Von Bibra,op. cit., p. 94.[1616]Dr. Percy, F.R.S., and other practical metallurgists have shown that this view is untenable. See Lubbock, “Prehist. Times,” p. 621.[1617]Annales for Oldk., 1852, p. 249;Jahrbüch. des Ver. v. Alt.-freund im Rheinl., vol. lix. p. 21; Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62; Perrin, “Et. préh. sur la Savoie,” 1870, p. 19; Layard, “Nineveh and Babylon,” p. 670.[1618]“Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 8vo. Erlangen, 1869.[1619]Bull. di Paletnol. Ital., 1879, p. 159.[1620]Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 36; “Alb.,” pl. xxviii.; “Matériaux,” vol. xi. pl. i. 1.Proc. Soc. Ant.2nd Ser., vol. viii. p. 250.[1621]Arch. Camb., 4th S., vol. ii. p. 59, vol. viii. p. 210; Pennant’s “Tour,” vol. i. p. 63;Arch. Journ., vol. xxix. 194;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 286.[1622]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118.[1623]Journ. Roy. Inst. Cornw., No. xxi.[1624]Arch., vol. xv. p. 120 (Leland).[1625]Arch., vol. xvi. p. 363.[1626]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. v. p. 427.[1627]Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 288.[1628]Surrey Arch. Coll., vol. vi.[1629]Anderson’s “Croydon,” p. 10.[1630]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 248.[1631]Journ. Anthrop. Inst., vol. vi. p. 195.[1632]Penes me, Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 24.[1633]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 302.[1634]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1635]In the British Museum.[1636]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. iii. p. 232.[1637]Smith’s “Coll. Ant.,” vol. i. p. 101.[1638]In the British Museum.[1639]Arch. Journ., vol. ii. p. 80.[1640]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.[1641]Arch., vol. v. p. 114.[1642]PenesCapt. Brooke, Ufford Hall, Woodbridge.[1643]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 69.[1644]Arch. Æliana, vol. ii. p. 213.[1645]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. i. p. 306;Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 86.[1646]Arch., vol. v. p. 115.[1647]Wilson, “P. A. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 348;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 132.[1648]Crawfurd,Trans. Eth. Soc., vol. iii. p. 350.[1649]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ix. p. 435.[1650]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 376.[1651]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 44; Von Sacken, “Das Grabfeld von Hallstatt,” p. 118.[1652]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 93.[1653]“Manners and Customs of the Anc. Irish,” O’Curry and Sullivan, p. ccccxix.[1654]“Cong. préh.,” Buda-Pest, vol. i. p. 242;Engineer, March 26, 1876.[1655]Arch. für Anth., vol. ix. p. 265.[1656]Jul. Pollux. “Onom.,” lib. ix. c. 6, p. 1055.[1657]Evans, “Coins of the Anc. Brit.,” p. 123.[1658]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39; whence the cut is borrowed.[1659]Arch. Journ., vol. xxviii. p. 196. See alsoArch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 7, for an interesting paper on Ancient Metallurgy, by the late Prof. J. Phillips.[1660]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39.[1661]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sarda,” p. 26.[1662]Keller, “Lake-dwellings,” Eng. ed., p. 54.[1663]Op. cit., p. 118.[1664]“Preh. Times,” p. 40.[1665]Arch. Æliana, vol. iv. p. 107;Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 2.[1666]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ii. p. 33, vol. vi. p. 209.[1667]Journ. Ethnol. Soc., vol. ii. p. 341;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iv. p. 513.Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xxxvi. p. 146. Only seven depressions are there described.[1668]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 45.[1669]Ibid., vol. iv. p. 383, and v. p. 109.[1670]Ibid., vol. ii. p. 34; Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 343, pl. v.[1671]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335, pl. vi.; Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 392.[1672]“Catal.,” p. 78.[1673]Wilde’s “Catal.,” p. 91, fig. 72.[1674]Pegazzoni, “L’uomo preist. nella Prov. di Como,” 1878, pl. vi. 18-20.[1675]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 358, fig. 46.[1676]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335.[1677]“Les dernières trouvailles du Lac de Bienne,” 1879, pl. i. 10; “Matériaux,” 1880, pl. i. 10.[1678]Exp. Arch. de la Sav., 1878, pl. iv. 187; Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. lii.[1679]“Matériaux,” vol. x. p. 112.[1680]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 185.[1681]“The Barrow Diggers,” p. 75, pl. v. 10. It is so badly drawn that it might be taken for a broken mould for a palstave.Arch., vol. xxviii. p. 451.[1682]P. 78.[1683]Hampel, “Cat. de l’Exp. préhist.,” 1876, p. 134; “Ant. préh. de la Hongrie;” “Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1684]Wittlock, “Jord-fynd från Wärend’s förhist. Tid.,” 1874, p. 68.[1685]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 345, figs. 48 and 49. Fig. 61 shows a casting from one of the moulds.[1686]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 91, fig. 73.[1687]Gastaldi, “Nuovi cenni,” 1862, Tav. iv. 22.[1688]Vol. ix. p. 185.[1689]Mém. des Ant. du Nord, 1872-77, p. 142.[1690]Arch., vol. xv. p. 349, pl. xxxiv. 1, 2.[1691]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 93.[1692]Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 170. The cut is kindly lent by the Council of the Institute.[1693]Ranchet e Regazzoni,Atti della Soc. Ital. de sc. nat., vol. xxi.[1694]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 48, pl. vi. I am indebted to the Council for the use of these four blocks.[1695]Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 257, vol. vi. p. 385; Lindenschmit, “A. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 5.[1696]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1697]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iv. p. 148.[1698]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sard.,” p. 27.[1699]“Troy and its Remains,” pp. 82, 110, 139, 173, 261, &c.[1700]SeeArch., vol. v. p. 108et seqq.[1701]“Collectanea,” vol. iv. p. 59.[1702]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 386, vol. xviii. p. 166;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. ii. p. 128.[1703]Vallancey, “Coll.,” vol. iv. p. 59, pl. x. 10.[1704]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iii. p. 158.[1705]Chantre, “Album,” pl. i.; “Age du Br.,” 1ère. ptie., p. 26[1706]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 433.[1707]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 109, pl. vii. 43; Troyon, “Hab. Lac.,” pl. x. 15.[1708]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 3.[1709]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronze-schwerter des K. Mus. zu Berlin,” Taf. xiv. 9.[1710]Lindenschmit,ubi sup., Taf. i. 4.[1711]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 408; “Cong. préh.,” Stockholm vol. i. p. 445.[1712]Holtzappfel, “Turning and Mech. Manip.,” vol. i. p. 321;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 337.[1713]“Anc. British Coins,” p. 124.[1714]Proc. Geol. and Polyt. Soc. of Yorkshire, 1866, p. 439.[1715]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. Vorz.,” Heft. i. Taf. ii. 10, 11, 12.[1716]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. xiv. p. 171;Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 192.[1717]Arch., vol. xxii. p. 424;Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 387; “Arch. Inst.,” Norwich vol., p. xxvi. I have assumed that the mould described in these passages is one and the same.[1718]Arch., vol. v. pl. vii.;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 336, pl. iii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1719]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. pl. ii. 5, 6, 7, 8.[1720]“Itin. Cur.,” pl. xcvi, 2nd ed.[1721]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1722]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.[1723]Ibid.[1724]“Surrey Arch. Soc. Coll.,” vol. vi.[1725]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronzeschwerter des K. Mus.,” p. 76.[1726]Ulfsparre, “Svenska Fornsaker,” pl. viii. 93.[1727]Mém. Soc. Ant. Norm., 1827-8, pl. xviii.[1728]Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. liv. 5.[1729]Keller, 7ter Bericht, p. 16, Taf. xvii.[1730]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.[1731]“Aarböger for Nord. Oldk.,” 1866, p. 124.[1732]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 409.[1733]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 382;Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. iii. pp. 10 and 58.[1734]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 258.[1735]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.[1736]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132. I am indebted to the Council for the use of this cut;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.[1737]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118, pl. ii.[1738]Journ. Roy. Inst, of Cornwall, No. xxi. fig. 4.[1739]“Petit Album,” pl. xxv. 6.[1740]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 260.[1741]Worsaae, “Nord. Olds.,” figs. 213, 214.[1742]Montelius, “La Suède préh.,” fig. 40.[1743]Hartshorne’s “Salop. Ant.,” p. 95.[1744]Proc. R. I. Acad., vol. iv. p. 439.[1745]Chap. xi. p. 235et seqq.[1746]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. ix. p. 120, whence this cut is borrowed;Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 184, vol. xv. p. 90.[1747]“Reliquary,” vol. iv. p. 63.[1748]Pennington, “Barrows and Bone Caves of Derbyshire,” 1877, p. 51.[1749]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 412.[1750]Page 128.[1751]Page 84.[1752]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 328[1753]Evans’s “Coins of the Anc. Britons,” p. 102.[1754]Vol. xvi. p. 348.[1755]Supra, p. 405;Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556.[1756]See also Col. A. Lane Fox’s “Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.,” inJourn. R. U. Service Inst., vol. xiii.[1757]The Bronze Period of Switzerland has by some been calculated to have begun not less than 3,000 yearsb.c.—Zaborowski Moindron, “L’Anc. de l’homme,” 1874, p. 208.[1758]See Greenwell’s “British Barrows,” p. 44et seqq.[1759]“British Barrows,” p. 19.[1760]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 348.[1761]See Worsaae inArch. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 30.[1762]“British Barrows,” pp. 32, 375. See alsoReliquary, vol. vi. p. 1.[1763]“Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.;”Journ. R. U. S. Inst., vol. xiii.[1764]“Preh. Times,” p. 73.[1765]Worsaae, in “Aarb. for Nord. Oldk.,” 1879, p. 327.[1766]See A. Bertrand inRev. Arch., vol. xxvi. p. 363.[1767]See Chantre, “Age du Bronze,” 2ème ptie. p. 281.[1768]“Habitations Lacustres de la Savoie,” 1864, 1867, 1869.[1769]See Thurnam inArch., vol. xliii. p. 494.[1770]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 497.[1771]See “Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 411. I may take this opportunity of correcting the statement that the Assynt necklace is inlaid with gold. It is merely engraved with various patterns, in which micaceous grains of sand got lodged and were mistaken for gold.[1772]“Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 402.[1773]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 352;Quart. Journ. Suff. Inst., vol. i. p. 31.[1774]See also Rolleston’s App. to “British Barrows;” Lubbock’s “Prehist. Times;” Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” &c., &c.
[1560]“Essays on Arch. Sub.,” vol. i. p. 25.
[1561]“Anc. Stone Imp.,” p. 407.
[1562]Arch. Journ., vol. xxii. p. 74;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. xii. p. 97.
[1563]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.
[1564]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., N.S., vol. i., p. 322, whence this cut is borrowed.
[1565]Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 179.
[1566]Ibid.
[1567]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 200.
[1568]Arch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 120.
[1569]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 236. This and the following cut are kindly lent me by the Council of the Society.
[1570]Fourdrignier, “Double Sép. Gaul.,” 1878, pl. v. and vi.
[1571]Arch. Æliana, vol. i. p. 13, pl. ii. 14.
[1572]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 156.
[1573]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. vii. p. 485.
[1574]Arch. Journ., vol. xxx. p. 282, fig. 3;Anthrop. Inst. Journ., vol. iii. p. 230.
[1575]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556, pl. xxxvii. figs. 8 and 11.
[1576]Pl. xl. 16;Samlede Fund, pl. xvi. 12.
[1577]Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. vi. p. 137.
[1578]“Age du Bronze,” 1ère ptie., p. 188.
[1579]Rev. Anthrop., 1875, tome iv. p. 650.
[1580]See Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1re ptie., p. 152.
[1581]“Anc. Wilts,” vol. i. p. 209.
[1582]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 252.
[1583]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 46.
[1584]SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxvi. pp. 35 and 52;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. v. p. 111; C. R. Smith’s “Catal. London Ant.,” p. 82;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. viii. p. 208; vol. x. p. 57; “Hor. Fer.,” p. 184.
[1585]Trans. Kilkenny Arch. Soc., vol. iii. p. 65.Annaler for Oldk., 1836, p. 175.
[1586]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 90.
[1587]Vol. xliii.
[1588]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” 4th ed., p. 223.
[1589]P. 399et seqq.
[1590]Erroneously called a celt by Mr. Kirwan. SeeArch. Journ., vol. xxiv. p. 189, whence this cut is borrowed.
[1591]“Ten Years’ Dig.,” p. 173.
[1592]P. 21.
[1593]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. pp. 350, 408.
[1594]Shirley’s “Dominion of Farney;”Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 96.
[1595]Wilson,op. cit., vol. i. p. 409. I am indebted to Messrs. Macmillan & Co. for the use of this cut.
[1596]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 529, fig. 407. This cut has been lent me by the Council of the Academy.
[1597]Vol. v. p. 82.
[1598]Catal. Mus. R. I. A., p. 531, fig. 409.
[1599]Rev. Arch., N.S., vol. xxvi. p. 326.
[1600]A paper on “Etruscan Commerce with the North,” by Dr. Hermann Genthe, will be found in theArchiv. für Anthrop., vol. vi. p. 237.
[1601]Von Sacken, “Das Grabf. v. Hallst.,” Taf. xxi. 1.
[1602]April 30, 1879.
[1603]Percy’s “Metallurgy,” vol. i. p. 474 (ed. 1861).
[1604]Comptes Rendus de l’Ac. des Sc., vol. lxxvi. (1873), p. 1232.
[1605]Phil. Trans., 1796, vol. lxxxvi. p. 395.
[1606]Chantre, “L’Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62.
[1607]J. A. Phillips,Q. J. Chem. Soc., vol. iv. p. 266.
[1608]O’Curry’s “Mann. and Cust. of the Anc. Irish,” vol. i. p. ccccxx.
[1609]O’Curry,op. cit., p. ccccxviii.
[1610]For an interesting essay on the sources of bronze, see Prof. Sullivan in the Introduction to O’Curry’s “Manners and Customs of the Ancient Irish,” p. ccccvii. See also H. H. Howorth, F.S.A., on the “Archæology of Bronze,”Trans. Ethnol. Soc., vol. vi. p. 72; Sabatier, “Production de l’or, de l’argent, et du cuivre,” &c., 1850; Von Bibra, “Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 1869; De Fellenberg, “Bull. de la Soc. des Sc. nat. de Berne,” 1860; Wocel, “Chemische Analysen anb. Bronze legirungen,” in Sitz.-Ber. phil. hist. Classe. Acad. der Wiss. Wien. Bd. xvi. 169; “Kelternes, Germanernes og Slavernes Bronzer,” inAntiq. Tidskrift., 1852-54, p. 206; Morlot, “Les Métaux dans l’Age du Bronze,”Mém. Soc. Ant. du Nord, 1866-71, p. 23; Wibel, “Die Cultur der Bronze-Zeit Nord und Mittel Europas,” 1865; Von Cohausen’s Review of Wibel,Archiv. für Anth., vol. i. p. 320, vol. iii. p. 37; Lubbock, “Prehistoric Times,” p. 59et seqq.; Zaborowski-Moindron, “L’Ancienneté de l’Homme,” 1874; Dr. C. F. Wiberg, “Einfluss der Etrusker und Griechen auf die Bronze Cultur,”Arch. für Anth., vol. iv. p. 11; Troyon, “Monuments de l’Ant. dans l’Europe barbare,” 1868; De Rougemont, “L’Age du Bronze,” 1866; A. Bertrand, “Arch. Celtique et Gauloise,” 1876; G. De Mortillet, “Origine du Bronze,”Revue d’Anthrop., vol. iv. p. 650; Wilson, “Preh. Annals of Scotland,” and “Prehistoric Man.”
[1611]Job, chap. xxviii. v. 2.
[1612]P. 115.
[1613]Comptes Rendus, 1866, vol. lxii. pp. 223, 346.
[1614]The doubts raised by the late Sir G. C. Lewis on this point have been dealt with by Sir John Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 63et seqq.
[1615]Von Bibra,op. cit., p. 94.
[1616]Dr. Percy, F.R.S., and other practical metallurgists have shown that this view is untenable. See Lubbock, “Prehist. Times,” p. 621.
[1617]Annales for Oldk., 1852, p. 249;Jahrbüch. des Ver. v. Alt.-freund im Rheinl., vol. lix. p. 21; Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 62; Perrin, “Et. préh. sur la Savoie,” 1870, p. 19; Layard, “Nineveh and Babylon,” p. 670.
[1618]“Die Bronzen und Kupferlegirungen,” 8vo. Erlangen, 1869.
[1619]Bull. di Paletnol. Ital., 1879, p. 159.
[1620]Chantre, “Age du Br.,” 1ère ptie., p. 36; “Alb.,” pl. xxviii.; “Matériaux,” vol. xi. pl. i. 1.Proc. Soc. Ant.2nd Ser., vol. viii. p. 250.
[1621]Arch. Camb., 4th S., vol. ii. p. 59, vol. viii. p. 210; Pennant’s “Tour,” vol. i. p. 63;Arch. Journ., vol. xxix. 194;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 286.
[1622]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118.
[1623]Journ. Roy. Inst. Cornw., No. xxi.
[1624]Arch., vol. xv. p. 120 (Leland).
[1625]Arch., vol. xvi. p. 363.
[1626]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. v. p. 427.
[1627]Arch. Journ., vol. xxvi. p. 288.
[1628]Surrey Arch. Coll., vol. vi.
[1629]Anderson’s “Croydon,” p. 10.
[1630]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 248.
[1631]Journ. Anthrop. Inst., vol. vi. p. 195.
[1632]Penes me, Arch. Journ., vol. xi. p. 24.
[1633]Arch. Journ., vol. ix. p. 302.
[1634]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.
[1635]In the British Museum.
[1636]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd Ser., vol. iii. p. 232.
[1637]Smith’s “Coll. Ant.,” vol. i. p. 101.
[1638]In the British Museum.
[1639]Arch. Journ., vol. ii. p. 80.
[1640]Arch., vol. v. p. 116.
[1641]Arch., vol. v. p. 114.
[1642]PenesCapt. Brooke, Ufford Hall, Woodbridge.
[1643]Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 69.
[1644]Arch. Æliana, vol. ii. p. 213.
[1645]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. i. p. 306;Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 86.
[1646]Arch., vol. v. p. 115.
[1647]Wilson, “P. A. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 348;Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 132.
[1648]Crawfurd,Trans. Eth. Soc., vol. iii. p. 350.
[1649]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ix. p. 435.
[1650]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 376.
[1651]Lubbock, “Preh. Times,” p. 44; Von Sacken, “Das Grabfeld von Hallstatt,” p. 118.
[1652]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 93.
[1653]“Manners and Customs of the Anc. Irish,” O’Curry and Sullivan, p. ccccxix.
[1654]“Cong. préh.,” Buda-Pest, vol. i. p. 242;Engineer, March 26, 1876.
[1655]Arch. für Anth., vol. ix. p. 265.
[1656]Jul. Pollux. “Onom.,” lib. ix. c. 6, p. 1055.
[1657]Evans, “Coins of the Anc. Brit.,” p. 123.
[1658]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39; whence the cut is borrowed.
[1659]Arch. Journ., vol. xxviii. p. 196. See alsoArch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 7, for an interesting paper on Ancient Metallurgy, by the late Prof. J. Phillips.
[1660]Arch. Journ., vol. xvi. p. 39.
[1661]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sarda,” p. 26.
[1662]Keller, “Lake-dwellings,” Eng. ed., p. 54.
[1663]Op. cit., p. 118.
[1664]“Preh. Times,” p. 40.
[1665]Arch. Æliana, vol. iv. p. 107;Arch. Journ., vol. x. p. 2.
[1666]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. ii. p. 33, vol. vi. p. 209.
[1667]Journ. Ethnol. Soc., vol. ii. p. 341;Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iv. p. 513.Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xxxvi. p. 146. Only seven depressions are there described.
[1668]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. i. p. 45.
[1669]Ibid., vol. iv. p. 383, and v. p. 109.
[1670]Ibid., vol. ii. p. 34; Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 343, pl. v.
[1671]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335, pl. vi.; Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 392.
[1672]“Catal.,” p. 78.
[1673]Wilde’s “Catal.,” p. 91, fig. 72.
[1674]Pegazzoni, “L’uomo preist. nella Prov. di Como,” 1878, pl. vi. 18-20.
[1675]Wilson, “Preh. Ann.,” vol. i. p. 358, fig. 46.
[1676]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 335.
[1677]“Les dernières trouvailles du Lac de Bienne,” 1879, pl. i. 10; “Matériaux,” 1880, pl. i. 10.
[1678]Exp. Arch. de la Sav., 1878, pl. iv. 187; Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. lii.
[1679]“Matériaux,” vol. x. p. 112.
[1680]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 185.
[1681]“The Barrow Diggers,” p. 75, pl. v. 10. It is so badly drawn that it might be taken for a broken mould for a palstave.Arch., vol. xxviii. p. 451.
[1682]P. 78.
[1683]Hampel, “Cat. de l’Exp. préhist.,” 1876, p. 134; “Ant. préh. de la Hongrie;” “Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.
[1684]Wittlock, “Jord-fynd från Wärend’s förhist. Tid.,” 1874, p. 68.
[1685]“Preh. Ann. of Scot.,” vol. i. p. 345, figs. 48 and 49. Fig. 61 shows a casting from one of the moulds.
[1686]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 91, fig. 73.
[1687]Gastaldi, “Nuovi cenni,” 1862, Tav. iv. 22.
[1688]Vol. ix. p. 185.
[1689]Mém. des Ant. du Nord, 1872-77, p. 142.
[1690]Arch., vol. xv. p. 349, pl. xxxiv. 1, 2.
[1691]Wilde, “Catal. Mus. R. I. A.,” p. 93.
[1692]Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 170. The cut is kindly lent by the Council of the Institute.
[1693]Ranchet e Regazzoni,Atti della Soc. Ital. de sc. nat., vol. xxi.
[1694]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., vol. vi. p. 48, pl. vi. I am indebted to the Council for the use of these four blocks.
[1695]Arch. Journ., vol. iii. p. 257, vol. vi. p. 385; Lindenschmit, “A. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 5.
[1696]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.
[1697]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iv. p. 148.
[1698]Spano, “Paleoetnol. Sard.,” p. 27.
[1699]“Troy and its Remains,” pp. 82, 110, 139, 173, 261, &c.
[1700]SeeArch., vol. v. p. 108et seqq.
[1701]“Collectanea,” vol. iv. p. 59.
[1702]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 386, vol. xviii. p. 166;Arch. Camb., 3rd S., vol. ii. p. 128.
[1703]Vallancey, “Coll.,” vol. iv. p. 59, pl. x. 10.
[1704]Proc. Soc. Ant., vol. iii. p. 158.
[1705]Chantre, “Album,” pl. i.; “Age du Br.,” 1ère. ptie., p. 26
[1706]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 433.
[1707]Keller, 3er Bericht, p. 109, pl. vii. 43; Troyon, “Hab. Lac.,” pl. x. 15.
[1708]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. V.,” vol. ii. Heft. xii. Taf. i. 3.
[1709]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronze-schwerter des K. Mus. zu Berlin,” Taf. xiv. 9.
[1710]Lindenschmit,ubi sup., Taf. i. 4.
[1711]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 408; “Cong. préh.,” Stockholm vol. i. p. 445.
[1712]Holtzappfel, “Turning and Mech. Manip.,” vol. i. p. 321;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 337.
[1713]“Anc. British Coins,” p. 124.
[1714]Proc. Geol. and Polyt. Soc. of Yorkshire, 1866, p. 439.
[1715]Lindenschmit, “Alt. u. h. Vorz.,” Heft. i. Taf. ii. 10, 11, 12.
[1716]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. xiv. p. 171;Arch. Journ., vol. xx. p. 192.
[1717]Arch., vol. xxii. p. 424;Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 387; “Arch. Inst.,” Norwich vol., p. xxvi. I have assumed that the mould described in these passages is one and the same.
[1718]Arch., vol. v. pl. vii.;Arch. Journ., vol. iv. p. 336, pl. iii. 5, 6, 7, 8.
[1719]Arch. Journ., vol. iv. pl. ii. 5, 6, 7, 8.
[1720]“Itin. Cur.,” pl. xcvi, 2nd ed.
[1721]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.
[1722]Arch. Journ., vol. xviii. p. 166.
[1723]Ibid.
[1724]“Surrey Arch. Soc. Coll.,” vol. vi.
[1725]Bastian und A. Voss, “Die Bronzeschwerter des K. Mus.,” p. 76.
[1726]Ulfsparre, “Svenska Fornsaker,” pl. viii. 93.
[1727]Mém. Soc. Ant. Norm., 1827-8, pl. xviii.
[1728]Chantre, “Alb.,” pl. liv. 5.
[1729]Keller, 7ter Bericht, p. 16, Taf. xvii.
[1730]“Matériaux,” vol. xii. p. 184.
[1731]“Aarböger for Nord. Oldk.,” 1866, p. 124.
[1732]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 409.
[1733]Arch. Journ., vol. vi. p. 382;Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. iii. pp. 10 and 58.
[1734]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 258.
[1735]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 232.
[1736]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. ii. p. 132. I am indebted to the Council for the use of this cut;Arch. Journ., vol. xix. p. 358.
[1737]Arch., vol. xv. p. 118, pl. ii.
[1738]Journ. Roy. Inst, of Cornwall, No. xxi. fig. 4.
[1739]“Petit Album,” pl. xxv. 6.
[1740]Arch. Assoc. Journ., vol. xiv. p. 260.
[1741]Worsaae, “Nord. Olds.,” figs. 213, 214.
[1742]Montelius, “La Suède préh.,” fig. 40.
[1743]Hartshorne’s “Salop. Ant.,” p. 95.
[1744]Proc. R. I. Acad., vol. iv. p. 439.
[1745]Chap. xi. p. 235et seqq.
[1746]Suss. Arch. Coll., vol. ix. p. 120, whence this cut is borrowed;Arch. Journ., vol. xiii. p. 184, vol. xv. p. 90.
[1747]“Reliquary,” vol. iv. p. 63.
[1748]Pennington, “Barrows and Bone Caves of Derbyshire,” 1877, p. 51.
[1749]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. v. p. 412.
[1750]Page 128.
[1751]Page 84.
[1752]Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd S., vol. iii. p. 328
[1753]Evans’s “Coins of the Anc. Britons,” p. 102.
[1754]Vol. xvi. p. 348.
[1755]Supra, p. 405;Arch., vol. xliii. p. 556.
[1756]See also Col. A. Lane Fox’s “Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.,” inJourn. R. U. Service Inst., vol. xiii.
[1757]The Bronze Period of Switzerland has by some been calculated to have begun not less than 3,000 yearsb.c.—Zaborowski Moindron, “L’Anc. de l’homme,” 1874, p. 208.
[1758]See Greenwell’s “British Barrows,” p. 44et seqq.
[1759]“British Barrows,” p. 19.
[1760]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 348.
[1761]See Worsaae inArch. Journ., vol. xxiii. p. 30.
[1762]“British Barrows,” pp. 32, 375. See alsoReliquary, vol. vi. p. 1.
[1763]“Primitive Warfare, Sect. III.;”Journ. R. U. S. Inst., vol. xiii.
[1764]“Preh. Times,” p. 73.
[1765]Worsaae, in “Aarb. for Nord. Oldk.,” 1879, p. 327.
[1766]See A. Bertrand inRev. Arch., vol. xxvi. p. 363.
[1767]See Chantre, “Age du Bronze,” 2ème ptie. p. 281.
[1768]“Habitations Lacustres de la Savoie,” 1864, 1867, 1869.
[1769]See Thurnam inArch., vol. xliii. p. 494.
[1770]Arch., vol. xliii. p. 497.
[1771]See “Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 411. I may take this opportunity of correcting the statement that the Assynt necklace is inlaid with gold. It is merely engraved with various patterns, in which micaceous grains of sand got lodged and were mistaken for gold.
[1772]“Ancient Stone Impts.,” p. 402.
[1773]Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 352;Quart. Journ. Suff. Inst., vol. i. p. 31.
[1774]See also Rolleston’s App. to “British Barrows;” Lubbock’s “Prehist. Times;” Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” &c., &c.