Chapter 9

[12]Op. cit.He supposes in each case the pre-existence of a parent magma from which the eruptive series started and which had a silica-percentage of about 64 or 65. In this difficult subject it is of the utmost importance to accumulate fact before proceeding to speculation.

During Tertiary time in Central France more than one cycle may be made out in distinct districts. Thus in the Velay, during the Miocene Period, volcanic activity began with the outpouring of basalts, followed successively by trachytes, labradorites and augitic andesites, phonolites and basalts. The Pliocene eruptions showed a reversion to the intermediate types of augitic andesites and trachytes, followed by abundant basalts, which continued to be poured forth in Pleistocene time.[13]

[13]M. Boule, "Description Géologique du Velay,"Bull. Carte. Géol. France, 1892. This author draws special attention to the evidence for the alternation of basic and more acid material in the Tertiary eruptions of Central France.

Further north, in Auvergne, where the eruptions come down to a later period, the volcanic sequence appears to have been first a somewhat acid group of lavas (trachytes or domites), followed by a series of basalts, then by andesites and labradorites, the latest outflows again consisting of basalts.[14]

[14]M. Michel Lévy,Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 1890, p. 704.

Not less striking is the succession of lavas in the Yellowstone region, as described by Mr. Iddings. The first eruptions consisted of andesites. These were followed by abundant discharges of basalt, succeeded by later outflows of andesite, and of basalt like that previously erupted. After a period of extensive erosion, occupying a prolonged interval of time, volcanic energy was renewed by the eruption of a vast flood of rhyolite, after which came a feebler outflow of basalt that brought the cycle to a close, though geysers and fumaroles show that the volcanic fires are not yet entirely extinguished below.[15]

[15]Journal of Geology, Chicago, i. (1893) p. 606. See also this author's excellent monograph on "Electric Peak and Sepulchre Mountain,"12th Ann. Rep. U.S. Geol. Survey(1890-91), and Mr. H. W. Turner on "The Succession of Tertiary Volcanic Rocks in the Sierra Nevada of North America,"14th Ann. Rep. U.S. Geol. Survey(1892-93), p. 493.

But not only is there evidence of a remarkable evolution or succession or erupted material within the volcanic cycle of a single geological period. One of the objects of the present work is to bring forward proofs that suchcycles have succeeded each other again and again, at widely separated intervals, within the same region. After the completion of a cycle and the relapse of volcanic energy into repose, there has been a renewal of the previous condition of the subterranean magma, giving rise ultimately to a similar succession of erupted materials.

If we are at a loss to account for the changes in the sequence of lavas during a single volcanic cycle, our difficulties are increased when we find that in some way the magma is restored each time to somewhat the same initial condition. Analogies may be traced between the differentiation which has taken place within a plutonic intrusive boss or sill and the sequence of lavas in volcanic cycles. It can be shown that though the original magma that supplied the intrusive mass may be supposed to have had a fairly uniform composition deep down in its reservoir, differentiation set in long before the intrusive mass consolidated, the more basic constituents travelling outwards to the margin and leaving the central parts more acid. If some such process takes place within a lava-reservoir, it may account for a sequence of variations in composition. But this would not meet all the difficulties of the case, nor explain the determining cause of the separation of the constituents within the reservoir of molten rock, whether arising from temperature, specific gravity, or other influence. This subject will be further considered in connection with intrusive Bosses.

Another fact which may be regarded as now well established is the persistence of composition and structure in the lavas of all ages. Notwithstanding the oft-repeated cycles in the character of the magma, the materials erupted to the surface, whether acid or basic, have retained with wonderful uniformity the same fundamental characteristics. No part of the contribution of British geology to the elucidation of the history of volcanic action is of more importance than the evidence which it furnishes for this persistent sameness of the subterranean magma. An artificial line has sometimes been drawn between the volcanic products of Tertiary time and those of earlier ages. But a careful study of the eruptive rocks of Britain shows that no such line of division is based upon any fundamental differences.

The lavas of Palæozoic time have of course been far longer exposed to alterations of every kind than those of the Tertiary periods, and certain superficial distinctions may be made between them. But when these accidental differences are eliminated, we find that the oldest known lavas exhibit the same types of structure and composition that are familiar in those of Tertiary and recent volcanoes. Many illustrations of this statement will be furnished in later chapters. As a particularly striking instance, I may cite here the most ancient and most modern lavas of the Grand Cañon of the Colorado. Mr. Walcott and Mr. Iddings have shown that in the Lower Cambrian, or possibly pre-Cambrian, formations of that great gorge, certain basic lavas were contemporaneously interstratified, which, in spite of their vast antiquity, are only slightly different from the modern basalts that have been poured over the surrounding plateau.[16]

[16]14th Annual Report U.S. Geol. Survey(1892-93).

The chief lavas found in Britain.—Of the lavas which have been poured out at the surface within the region of the British Isles, the following varieties are of most frequent occurrence. In the acid series are Rhyolites and Felsites, but the vitreous forms are probably all intrusive. The intermediate series is represented by Trachytes and Andesites (Porphyrites), which range from a glassy to a holocrystalline structure. The basic series includes Dolerites, Diabases, Basalts, Limburgites (or Magma-basalts, containing little or no felspar), and Picrites or other varieties of Peridotites. The intrusive rocks display a greater variety of composition and structure.

The coarser fragmentary materials thrown from volcanic vents are known as Agglomerates where they show no definite arrangement, and especially where they actually fill up the old funnels of discharge. When they have accumulated in sheets or strata of angular detritus outside an active vent they are termed Breccias, or if their component stones have been water-worn, Conglomerates. The finer ejected materials may be comprehended under the general name of Tuffs.

Although these various forms of pyroclastic detritus consist as a rule of thoroughly volcanic material, they may include fragments of non-volcanic rocks. This is especially the case among those which represent the earliest explosions of a volcano. The first efforts to establish an eruptive vent lead to the shattering of the terrestrial crust, and the consequent discharge of abundant debris of that crust. The breccias or agglomerates thus produced may contain, indeed, little or no truly volcanic material, but may be made up of fragments of granite, gneiss, sandstone, limestone, shale, or whatever may happen to be the rocks through which the eruptive orifice has been drilled. If the first explosions exhausted the energy of the vent, it may happen that the only discharges from it consisted merely of non-volcanic debris. Examples of this kind have been cited from various old volcanic districts. A striking case occurs at Sepulchre Mountain in the Yellowstone Park, where the lower breccias, the product of the earliest explosions of the Electric Peak volcano, and attaining a thickness of 500 feet, are full of pieces of the Archæan rocks which underlie the younger formations of that district.[17]These non-volcanic stones do not occur among the breccias higher up. Obviously, however, though most abundant at first, pieces of the underlying rocks may reappear in subsequent discharges, wherever by the energy of explosion, fragments are broken from the walls of a volcanic chimney and hurled out of the crater. Illustrations of these features will be given in the account of the British Carboniferous, Permian and Tertiary volcanic rocks.

[17]Prof. J. P. Iddings,12th Ann. Rep. U.S. Geol. Survey(1890-91), p. 634.

It will be obvious that where the component materials of such fragmentary accumulations consist entirely of non-volcanic rocks, great caution must be exercised in attributing them to volcanic agency. Two sources oferror in such cases may here be pointed out. In the first place, where angular detritus has been precipitated into still water, as, for instance, from a crag or rocky declivity into a lake, a very coarse and tumultuous kind of breccia may be formed. It is conceivable that, in course of time, such a breccia may be buried under ordinary sediments, and may thereby be preserved, while all trace of its parent precipice may have disappeared. The breccia might resemble some true volcanic agglomerates, but the resemblance would be entirely deceptive.

In the second place, notice must be taken of the frequent results of movements within the terrestrial crust, whereby rocks have not only been ruptured but, as already pointed out, have been crushed into fragments. In this way, important masses of breccia or conglomerate have been formed, sometimes running for a number of miles and attaining a breadth of several hundred feet. The stones, often in huge blocks, have been derived from the surrounding rocks, and while sometimes angular, are sometimes well-rounded. They are imbedded in a finer matrix of the same material, and may be scattered promiscuously through the mass, in such a way as to present the closest resemblance to true volcanic breccia. Where the crushed material has included ancient igneous rocks it might deceive even an experienced geologist. Indeed, some rocks which have been mapped and described as volcanic tuffs or agglomerates are now known to be only examples of "crush-conglomerates."[18]

[18]For an account of "crush-conglomerates," see Mr. Lamplugh's paper on those of the Isle of Man,Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., li. (1895), p. 563. Mr. M'Henry has pointed to probable cases of mistake of this kind in Ireland,Nature, 5th March 1896. A. Geikie,Geol. Mag.November 1896.

Not only have vast quantities of detritus of non-volcanic rocks been shot forth from volcanic vents, but sometimes enormous solid masses of rock have been brought up by ascending lavas or have been ejected by explosive vapours. Every visitor to the puys of Auvergne will remember the great cliff-like prominence of granite and mica-schist which, as described long ago by Scrope, has been carried up by the trachyte of the Puy Chopine, and forms one of the summits of the dome (Fig. 344). The same phenomenon is observable at the Puy de Montchar, where large blocks of granite have been transported from the underlying platform. Abich has described some remarkable examples in the region of Erzeroum. The huge crater of Palandokän, 9687 feet above the sea contains, in cliff-like projections from its walls as well as scattered over its uneven bottom, great masses of marmorised limestone and alabaster, associated with pieces of the green chloritic schists, serpentines and gabbros of the underlying non-volcanic platform. These rocks, which form an integral part of the structure of the crater, have been carried up by masses of trachydoleritic, andesitic and quartz-trachytic lavas.[19]Examples will be given in a later chapter showing how gigantic blocks of mica-schist and other rocks have been carried many hundred feet upwards and buried among sheets of lava or masses of agglomerates during the Tertiary volcanic period in Britain (Fig. 262).

[19]Abich,Geologie des Armenischen Hochlandes(Part ii., western half), 1882, p. 76.

In the vast majority of cases, the fragmentary substances ejected by ancient volcanic explosions, like those of the present day, have consisted wholly or mainly of material which existed in a molten condition within the earth, and which has been violently expelled to the surface. Such ejected detritus varies from the finest impalpable dust or powder up to huge masses of solid rock. These various materials may come from more than one source. Where a volcanic orifice is blown out through already solidified lavas belonging to previous eruptions, the fragments of these lavas may accumulate within or around the vent, and be gradually consolidated into agglomerate or breccia. Again, explosions within the funnel may break up lava-crusts that have there formed over the cooling upper surface of the column of molten rock. Or the uprising lava in the chimney may be spurted out in lumps of slag and bombs, or may be violently blown out in the form of minute lapilli, or of extremely fine dust and ashes.

Although in theory these several varieties of origin may be discriminated, it is hardly possible always to distinguish them among the products of ancient volcanic action. In the great majority of cases old tuffs, having been originally deposited in water, have undergone a good deal of decomposition, and such early alteration has been aggravated by the subsequent influence of percolating meteoric water.

Where disintegration has not proceeded too far, the finer particles of tuffs may be seen to consist of minute angular pieces of altered glass, or of microlites or crystals, or of some vitreous or semi-vitreous substance, in which such microlites and crystals are enclosed. It has already been stated that the occurrence of glass, or of any substance which has resulted from the devitrification of glass, may be taken as good evidence of former volcanic activity.

Most commonly, especially in the case of tuffs of high antiquity, like those associated with the Palæozoic formations, the fresh glassy and microlitic constituents, so conspicuous in modern volcanic ashes, are hardly to be recognised. The finer dust which no doubt contained these characteristic substances has generally passed into dull, earthy, granular, or structureless material, though here and there, among basic tuffs, remaining as palagonite. In the midst of this decayed matrix, the lapilli of disrupted lavas may endure, but it may be difficult or impossible to decide whether they were derived from the breaking up of older lavas by explosion, or from the blowing out of the lava-crusts within the funnel.

The cellular structure, which we have seen to be a markedly volcanic peculiarity among the lavas, is not less so in their fragments among the agglomerates, breccias and tuffs; indeed it may be said to be eminently characteristic of them. The vesicles in the lapilli, bombs, and blocks are sometimes of large size, as in masses of ejected slag, but they range down to microscopic minuteness. The lapilli of many old tuffs are sometimes so crowded with such minute pores, as to show that they were originally true pumice.

The composition of tuffs must obviously depend upon that of the lavasfrom which they were derived. But their frequently decayed condition makes it less easy, in their case, to draw definite boundary-lines between varieties. In a group of acid lavas, the tuffs may be expected to be also acid, while among intermediate or basic lavas, the tuffs will generally be found to correspond. There are, however, exceptions to this general rule. As will be afterwards described in detail, abundant felsitic tuffs may be seen among the andesitic lavas of Lower Old Red Sandstone age in Scotland, and rhyolitic tuffs occur also among the Tertiary basalts of Antrim.

As a rule, basic and intermediate tuffs, like the lavas from which they have been derived, are rather more prone to decomposition than the acid varieties. One of their most characteristic features is the presence in them of lapilli of a minutely vesicular pumice, which will be more particularly described in connection with volcanic necks, of which it is a characteristic constituent. Occasional detached crystals of volcanic minerals, either entire or broken, may be detected in them, though perhaps less frequently than in the agglomerates. The earthy matrix is generally greenish in colour, varying into shades of brick-red, purple and brown.

The acid tuffs are, on the whole, paler in colour than the others, sometimes indeed they are white or pale grey, but graduate into tones of hæmatitic red or brown, the varying ferruginous tints being indicative of stages in the oxidation of the iron-bearing constituent minerals. Small rounded lapilli or angular fragments of felsite or rhyolite may be noticed among them, sometimes exhibiting the most perfect flow-structure. As typical examples of such tuffs, I may refer to those of the Pentland Hills, near Edinburgh, and those that lie between the two groups of basalt in Antrim.

Fig. 13.—Alternations of coarser and finer Tuff.

Thrown out promiscuously from active vents, the materials that form tuffs arrange themselves, on the whole, according to relative size over the surface on which they come to rest, the largest being generally grouped nearest to the focus of discharge, and the finest extending farthest from it. As the volcanoes of which records have been preserved among the geological formations were chiefly subaqueous, the fragmentary substances, as they fell into water, would naturally be to some extent spread out by the action of currents or waves. They would thus tend to take a more or less distinctly stratified arrangement. Moreover, as during an eruption there might be successive paroxysms of violence in the discharges, coarser and finer detritus would successively fall over the same spot. In this way, rapid alternations of texture would arise (Fig. 13). A little experience will enable the observer to distinguish between such truly volcanic variations and those of ordinary sedimentation, where, for instance, layers of gravel and sand repeatedly alternate. Besides the volcanic nature of the fragments and their non-water-wornforms, he will notice that here and there the larger blocks may be placed on end—a position the reverse of that usual in the disposal of aqueous sediments, but one which is not infrequently assumed by ejected stones, even when they fall through some little depth of water. Further, the occurrence of large pieces of lava, scattered at random through deposits of fine tuff, would lead him to recognize the tumultuous discharges of a volcanic focus, rather than the sorting and sifting action of moving water.

Admirable illustrations of these various characteristics may be gathered in endless number from the Palæozoic volcanic chronicles of Britain. I may especially cite the basin of the Firth of Forth as a classical region for the study of Carboniferous examples.

Fig. 14.—Alternations of Tuff (t,t,) with non-volcanic sediment (l,l).

When the conditions of modern volcanic eruptions are considered, it will be seen that where ejected ashes and stones fall into water, they will there mingle with any ordinary sediment that may be in course of deposition at the time. There will thus be a blending of volcanic and non-volcanic detritus, and the transition between the two may be so insensible that no hard line of demarcation can be drawn. Such intermingling has continually taken place during past ages. One of the first lessons learnt by the geologist, who begins the study of ancient volcanic records, is the necessity of recognizing this gradation of material, and likewise the frequently recurring alternations of true tuff with shale, sandstone, limestone or other entirely non-volcanic detritus (Fig. 14). He soon perceives that such facts as these furnish him with some of the most striking proofs of the reality and progress of former eruptions. The intermingling of much ordinary detritus with the volcanic material may be regarded as indicative either of comparatively feeble activity, or at least of considerable distance from the focus of discharge. It is sometimes possible to trace such intermixtures through gradually augmenting proportions of volcanic dust and stones, until the deposit becomes wholly volcanic in composition, and so coarse in texture as to indicate the proximity of the eruptive vent. On the other hand, the gradual decrease of the volcanic ejections can be followed in the upward sequence of a series of stratified deposits, until the whole material becomes entirely non-volcanic.

The occurrence of thin partings of tuff between ordinary sedimentary strata points to occasional intermittent eruptions of ashes or stones, the vigour and duration of each eruptive interval being roughly indicated by the thickness and coarseness of the volcanic detritus. The pauses in the volcanic activity allowed the deposit of ordinary sediment to proceed unchecked. The nature of such non-volcanic intercalations gives a clue to the physical conditions of sedimentation at the time, while their thickness affords some indication of the relative duration of the periods of volcanic repose.

A little reflection will convince the observer that in such a section as that represented inFig. 14the volcanic intercalations must be regarded as a mere local accident. Evidently the normal conditions of sedimentation at the time these strata were accumulated are indicated by the limestone bands (l,l). Had there been no volcanic eruptions, a continuous mass of limestone would have been deposited, but this continuity was from time to time interrupted by the explosions that gave rise to the intercalated bands of tuff (t,t).

The application of these rules of geological evidence will be best understood from actual examples of their use. Many illustrations of them will be subsequently given, more especially from the volcanic records of the Carboniferous period.

One of the most interesting peculiarities of interstratified tuffs is the not infrequent occurrence of the remains of plants and animals imbedded in them. Such remains would have been entombed in the ordinary sediment had there been no volcanic eruptions, and their presence in the tuffs is another convincing proof of contemporaneous volcanic action during the deposition of a sedimentary series. But they may be made to furnish much more information as to the chronology of the eruptions and the physical geography of the localities where the volcanoes were active, as will be set forth farther on.

Tuffs, as already remarked, frequently occur without any accompaniment of lava, although lavas seldom appear without some tuff. We thus learn that in the past, as at present, discharges of fragmentary materials alone were more common than the outflow of lava by itself. The relative proportions of the lavas and tuffs in a volcanic series vary indefinitely. In the Tertiary basalt-plateaux of Britain, the lavas succeed each other, sheet above sheet, for hundreds of feet, with few and trifling fragmental intercalations. Among the Carboniferous volcanic ejections, on the other hand, many solitary or successive bands of tuff may be observed without any visible sheets of lava. Viewed broadly, however, in their general distribution during geological time, the two great groups of volcanic material may be regarded as having generally appeared together. In all the great volcanic series, from the base of the Palæozoic systems up to the Tertiary plateaux, lavas and tuffs are found associated, much as they are among the ejections of modern volcanoes. They often alternate, and thus furnish evidence as to oscillations of energy at the eruptive vents.

Now and then, by the explosions from a volcano at the present day, a single stone may be ejected at such an angle and with such force as to fall to the ground at a long distance from the vent. In like manner, among the volcanic records of former periods, we may occasionally come upon a single block of lava imbedded among tuffs or even in non-volcanic strata. Where such a stone has fallen upon soft sediment, it can be seen to have sunk into it, pressing down the layers beneath it, and having the subsequently deposited layers heaped over it. An ejected block of this nature is represented among the tuffs shown inFig. 13. Another instance from a group of non-volcanicsediments is given inFig. 15, and is selected from a number of illustrations of this interesting feature which have been observed among the Lower Carboniferous formations of the basin of the Firth of Forth. A solitary block, imbedded in a series of strata, would not, of course, by itself afford a demonstration of volcanic activity. There are various ways in which such stones may be transported and dropped over a muddy water-bottom. They may, for example, be floated off attached to sea-weeds, or wrapped round by the roots of trees. But where a block of basalt or other volcanic rock has obviously descended with such force as to crush down the deposits on which it fell, and when lavas and tuffs are known to exist in the vicinity, there can be little hesitation in regarding such a block as having been ejected from a neighbouring vent, either during an explosion of exceptional violence or with an unusually low angle of projection.

Fig. 15.—Ejected block of Basalt which has fallen among Carboniferous shales and limestones, shore, Pettycur, Fife.

In conclusion, reference may conveniently be made here to another variety of fragmental volcanic materials which cannot always be satisfactorily distinguished from true tuffs, although arising from a thoroughly non-volcanic agency. Where a mass of lava has been exposed to denudation, as, for instance, when a volcanic island has been formed in a lake or in the sea, the detritus worn away from it may be spread out like any other kind of sediment. Though derived from the degradation of lava, such a mechanical deposit is not properly a tuff, nor can it even be included among strictly volcanic formations. It may be called a volcanic conglomerate, rhyolitic conglomerate, diabase sandstone, felsitic shale, or by any other name that will adequately denote its composition and texture. But it may not afford proof of strictly contemporaneous volcanic activity. All that we are entitled to infer from such a deposit is that, at the time when it was laid down, volcanic rocks of a certain kind were exposed at the surface and were undergoing degradation. But the date of their original eruption may have been long previous to that of the formation of the detrital deposit from their waste.

Nevertheless, it is sometimes possible to make sure that the conglomerate or sandstone, though wholly due to the mechanical destruction of already erupted lavas, was in a general sense contemporaneous with the volcanoes that gave forth these lavas. The detrital formation may be traced perhaps up to the lavas from which it was derived, and may be found to be intercalatedin the same sedimentary series with which they are associated. Or it may contain large bombs and slags, such as most probably came either directly from explosions or from the washing down of cinder-cones or other contemporaneously existing volcanic heaps. Examples of such intercalated conglomerates will be given from the Lower Old Red Sandstone of Central Scotland and from the Tertiary volcanic plateaux of the Inner Hebrides.

Back to Index Next