FOOTNOTES:[43]‘Auctoritatem ... in Ecclesia cantandi causa devotionis traxit a canta religiosorum antiquorum tam in novo quam in vetere testamento.’—John de Muris,Sum. Mas.[44]Cf. Strabo,De Bello Punico, Livy, Bk. xxxix.[45]Fr. Aug. Gevaert:La Mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine.[46]See Bellermann and Vincent:Anonymi scriptio de musica, Berlin, 1841.[47]Book v, Chap. 4.[48]For a fuller discussion of Græco-Roman music see Fr. Aug. Gevaert,La mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine(Ghent, 1895); Combarieu,Histoire de la musique, Vol. I, Chap. XIII (Paris, 1913); Charles Burney, ‘History of Music,’ Vol. I.[49]SeeGevaert:Op. cit.[50]Hugo Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².[51]For a detailed discussion of the metrical forms of ecclesiastical hymnody see Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².[52]Prudentius was the author of two collections of hymns, theKathemerinonand thePeristephanon, which were first adopted by the Spanish church and later introduced to Rome.[53]De init. cler., in Migne,Patr. Lat., cvii, 362.[54]See Paul I; Cor. xiv. 7; John Apocal., v. 8, xiv. 2, xv. 2.[55]A typical example is the recurrence of the phrase ‘Quoniam in æternum misericordia ejus’ in the 135th psalm.[56]Gerbert says of him: ‘Illud sacrorum hymnorum in Ecclesia genus, quod antiquissimus in Ecclesiæ temporibus in usu fuit, in Oriente præsertim a S. Ephrem, inter Latinos a S. Ambrosio excultum, unde et Ambrosiani dicti sunt hymni ... non cantum alternum, vel populi concentum primu(s) indux(it) in ecclesiam Mediolanensem S. Ambrosinus, sed cantum modulatum antea insuetum in ecclesia occidentali.’—De Cantu et Musica Sacra, I, p. 199. The writings of the Fathers are full of fugitive, grateful references to the musical achievements of Ambrose. Nor is his fame based on tradition, as in the case of St. Gregory. Some of his most devoted admirers are near contemporaries. The references to his work are not usually inspired by a clear understanding of just what he did for church music, but all together they create a vivid impression that St. Ambrose is the biggest single figure in the history of liturgical song.[57]According to some musical historians, Celestine introduced the antiphonal psalmody from Poitiers.[58]Regesta Pontificum Romanorum, Jeffe, 2d ed., Leipzig, 1881.[59]Vita S. Gregorii Magni, in Mabillon,Acta sanctorum ordinis benedicti, Paris, 1668.[60]Les origines du chant liturgique de l’église latine.[61]TheAllelujais not really a word but a sort of shrilling effect of great antiquity among the Hebrews and other people of the Orient. It was produced by choruses of women in triumphal processions and other joyous celebrations, and seems to have been about half way between a song and a cheer. The early Christians used it in songs of joy and praise, and perhaps sang it to take the place of the instrumental prelude of the psalms. ‘Laudes, hoc est alleluia canere, canticum est Hebræorum,’ says Isidore of Seville. (De off., I, 13.)[62]See ‘History of Irish Music,’ W. H. Grattan Flood, Dublin, 1906. Notker was the author of the famousAntiphona de Morte, beginningMedia vita in morte sumus(In the midst of life we are in death), which was quickly adopted as a funeral anthem throughout Europe. Miraculous effects were attributed to it, and its use was so much abused that the council of Cologne (1316) forbade anybody to sing it who was not specially authorized by a bishop.[63]Here should be noted one of the ways in which the Christian theorists misapplied the system of the Greeks. In Chapter IV we have seen that the Greeks did not consider pitch as in any way related to the character or ethos of the modes. Thisethoswas determined solely by the arrangement of the steps in the scale. The Christian theorists, on the other hand, though they still recognized the variety of character obtained by varying the distribution of steps in the scale, evidently allotted to the different modes a different final or pitch, and thus pitch came to influence the character of the modes. The modes might, however, still be transposed and sung at any pitch.[64]This dreaded interval was called by churchmendiabolus in musica, and as such studiously avoided.
FOOTNOTES:
[43]‘Auctoritatem ... in Ecclesia cantandi causa devotionis traxit a canta religiosorum antiquorum tam in novo quam in vetere testamento.’—John de Muris,Sum. Mas.[44]Cf. Strabo,De Bello Punico, Livy, Bk. xxxix.[45]Fr. Aug. Gevaert:La Mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine.[46]See Bellermann and Vincent:Anonymi scriptio de musica, Berlin, 1841.[47]Book v, Chap. 4.[48]For a fuller discussion of Græco-Roman music see Fr. Aug. Gevaert,La mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine(Ghent, 1895); Combarieu,Histoire de la musique, Vol. I, Chap. XIII (Paris, 1913); Charles Burney, ‘History of Music,’ Vol. I.[49]SeeGevaert:Op. cit.[50]Hugo Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².[51]For a detailed discussion of the metrical forms of ecclesiastical hymnody see Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².[52]Prudentius was the author of two collections of hymns, theKathemerinonand thePeristephanon, which were first adopted by the Spanish church and later introduced to Rome.[53]De init. cler., in Migne,Patr. Lat., cvii, 362.[54]See Paul I; Cor. xiv. 7; John Apocal., v. 8, xiv. 2, xv. 2.[55]A typical example is the recurrence of the phrase ‘Quoniam in æternum misericordia ejus’ in the 135th psalm.[56]Gerbert says of him: ‘Illud sacrorum hymnorum in Ecclesia genus, quod antiquissimus in Ecclesiæ temporibus in usu fuit, in Oriente præsertim a S. Ephrem, inter Latinos a S. Ambrosio excultum, unde et Ambrosiani dicti sunt hymni ... non cantum alternum, vel populi concentum primu(s) indux(it) in ecclesiam Mediolanensem S. Ambrosinus, sed cantum modulatum antea insuetum in ecclesia occidentali.’—De Cantu et Musica Sacra, I, p. 199. The writings of the Fathers are full of fugitive, grateful references to the musical achievements of Ambrose. Nor is his fame based on tradition, as in the case of St. Gregory. Some of his most devoted admirers are near contemporaries. The references to his work are not usually inspired by a clear understanding of just what he did for church music, but all together they create a vivid impression that St. Ambrose is the biggest single figure in the history of liturgical song.[57]According to some musical historians, Celestine introduced the antiphonal psalmody from Poitiers.[58]Regesta Pontificum Romanorum, Jeffe, 2d ed., Leipzig, 1881.[59]Vita S. Gregorii Magni, in Mabillon,Acta sanctorum ordinis benedicti, Paris, 1668.[60]Les origines du chant liturgique de l’église latine.[61]TheAllelujais not really a word but a sort of shrilling effect of great antiquity among the Hebrews and other people of the Orient. It was produced by choruses of women in triumphal processions and other joyous celebrations, and seems to have been about half way between a song and a cheer. The early Christians used it in songs of joy and praise, and perhaps sang it to take the place of the instrumental prelude of the psalms. ‘Laudes, hoc est alleluia canere, canticum est Hebræorum,’ says Isidore of Seville. (De off., I, 13.)[62]See ‘History of Irish Music,’ W. H. Grattan Flood, Dublin, 1906. Notker was the author of the famousAntiphona de Morte, beginningMedia vita in morte sumus(In the midst of life we are in death), which was quickly adopted as a funeral anthem throughout Europe. Miraculous effects were attributed to it, and its use was so much abused that the council of Cologne (1316) forbade anybody to sing it who was not specially authorized by a bishop.[63]Here should be noted one of the ways in which the Christian theorists misapplied the system of the Greeks. In Chapter IV we have seen that the Greeks did not consider pitch as in any way related to the character or ethos of the modes. Thisethoswas determined solely by the arrangement of the steps in the scale. The Christian theorists, on the other hand, though they still recognized the variety of character obtained by varying the distribution of steps in the scale, evidently allotted to the different modes a different final or pitch, and thus pitch came to influence the character of the modes. The modes might, however, still be transposed and sung at any pitch.[64]This dreaded interval was called by churchmendiabolus in musica, and as such studiously avoided.
[43]‘Auctoritatem ... in Ecclesia cantandi causa devotionis traxit a canta religiosorum antiquorum tam in novo quam in vetere testamento.’—John de Muris,Sum. Mas.
[43]‘Auctoritatem ... in Ecclesia cantandi causa devotionis traxit a canta religiosorum antiquorum tam in novo quam in vetere testamento.’—John de Muris,Sum. Mas.
[44]Cf. Strabo,De Bello Punico, Livy, Bk. xxxix.
[44]Cf. Strabo,De Bello Punico, Livy, Bk. xxxix.
[45]Fr. Aug. Gevaert:La Mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine.
[45]Fr. Aug. Gevaert:La Mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine.
[46]See Bellermann and Vincent:Anonymi scriptio de musica, Berlin, 1841.
[46]See Bellermann and Vincent:Anonymi scriptio de musica, Berlin, 1841.
[47]Book v, Chap. 4.
[47]Book v, Chap. 4.
[48]For a fuller discussion of Græco-Roman music see Fr. Aug. Gevaert,La mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine(Ghent, 1895); Combarieu,Histoire de la musique, Vol. I, Chap. XIII (Paris, 1913); Charles Burney, ‘History of Music,’ Vol. I.
[48]For a fuller discussion of Græco-Roman music see Fr. Aug. Gevaert,La mélopée antique dans le chant de l’église latine(Ghent, 1895); Combarieu,Histoire de la musique, Vol. I, Chap. XIII (Paris, 1913); Charles Burney, ‘History of Music,’ Vol. I.
[49]SeeGevaert:Op. cit.
[49]SeeGevaert:Op. cit.
[50]Hugo Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².
[50]Hugo Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².
[51]For a detailed discussion of the metrical forms of ecclesiastical hymnody see Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².
[51]For a detailed discussion of the metrical forms of ecclesiastical hymnody see Riemann:Handbuch der Musikgeschichte, I².
[52]Prudentius was the author of two collections of hymns, theKathemerinonand thePeristephanon, which were first adopted by the Spanish church and later introduced to Rome.
[52]Prudentius was the author of two collections of hymns, theKathemerinonand thePeristephanon, which were first adopted by the Spanish church and later introduced to Rome.
[53]De init. cler., in Migne,Patr. Lat., cvii, 362.
[53]De init. cler., in Migne,Patr. Lat., cvii, 362.
[54]See Paul I; Cor. xiv. 7; John Apocal., v. 8, xiv. 2, xv. 2.
[54]See Paul I; Cor. xiv. 7; John Apocal., v. 8, xiv. 2, xv. 2.
[55]A typical example is the recurrence of the phrase ‘Quoniam in æternum misericordia ejus’ in the 135th psalm.
[55]A typical example is the recurrence of the phrase ‘Quoniam in æternum misericordia ejus’ in the 135th psalm.
[56]Gerbert says of him: ‘Illud sacrorum hymnorum in Ecclesia genus, quod antiquissimus in Ecclesiæ temporibus in usu fuit, in Oriente præsertim a S. Ephrem, inter Latinos a S. Ambrosio excultum, unde et Ambrosiani dicti sunt hymni ... non cantum alternum, vel populi concentum primu(s) indux(it) in ecclesiam Mediolanensem S. Ambrosinus, sed cantum modulatum antea insuetum in ecclesia occidentali.’—De Cantu et Musica Sacra, I, p. 199. The writings of the Fathers are full of fugitive, grateful references to the musical achievements of Ambrose. Nor is his fame based on tradition, as in the case of St. Gregory. Some of his most devoted admirers are near contemporaries. The references to his work are not usually inspired by a clear understanding of just what he did for church music, but all together they create a vivid impression that St. Ambrose is the biggest single figure in the history of liturgical song.
[56]Gerbert says of him: ‘Illud sacrorum hymnorum in Ecclesia genus, quod antiquissimus in Ecclesiæ temporibus in usu fuit, in Oriente præsertim a S. Ephrem, inter Latinos a S. Ambrosio excultum, unde et Ambrosiani dicti sunt hymni ... non cantum alternum, vel populi concentum primu(s) indux(it) in ecclesiam Mediolanensem S. Ambrosinus, sed cantum modulatum antea insuetum in ecclesia occidentali.’—De Cantu et Musica Sacra, I, p. 199. The writings of the Fathers are full of fugitive, grateful references to the musical achievements of Ambrose. Nor is his fame based on tradition, as in the case of St. Gregory. Some of his most devoted admirers are near contemporaries. The references to his work are not usually inspired by a clear understanding of just what he did for church music, but all together they create a vivid impression that St. Ambrose is the biggest single figure in the history of liturgical song.
[57]According to some musical historians, Celestine introduced the antiphonal psalmody from Poitiers.
[57]According to some musical historians, Celestine introduced the antiphonal psalmody from Poitiers.
[58]Regesta Pontificum Romanorum, Jeffe, 2d ed., Leipzig, 1881.
[58]Regesta Pontificum Romanorum, Jeffe, 2d ed., Leipzig, 1881.
[59]Vita S. Gregorii Magni, in Mabillon,Acta sanctorum ordinis benedicti, Paris, 1668.
[59]Vita S. Gregorii Magni, in Mabillon,Acta sanctorum ordinis benedicti, Paris, 1668.
[60]Les origines du chant liturgique de l’église latine.
[60]Les origines du chant liturgique de l’église latine.
[61]TheAllelujais not really a word but a sort of shrilling effect of great antiquity among the Hebrews and other people of the Orient. It was produced by choruses of women in triumphal processions and other joyous celebrations, and seems to have been about half way between a song and a cheer. The early Christians used it in songs of joy and praise, and perhaps sang it to take the place of the instrumental prelude of the psalms. ‘Laudes, hoc est alleluia canere, canticum est Hebræorum,’ says Isidore of Seville. (De off., I, 13.)
[61]TheAllelujais not really a word but a sort of shrilling effect of great antiquity among the Hebrews and other people of the Orient. It was produced by choruses of women in triumphal processions and other joyous celebrations, and seems to have been about half way between a song and a cheer. The early Christians used it in songs of joy and praise, and perhaps sang it to take the place of the instrumental prelude of the psalms. ‘Laudes, hoc est alleluia canere, canticum est Hebræorum,’ says Isidore of Seville. (De off., I, 13.)
[62]See ‘History of Irish Music,’ W. H. Grattan Flood, Dublin, 1906. Notker was the author of the famousAntiphona de Morte, beginningMedia vita in morte sumus(In the midst of life we are in death), which was quickly adopted as a funeral anthem throughout Europe. Miraculous effects were attributed to it, and its use was so much abused that the council of Cologne (1316) forbade anybody to sing it who was not specially authorized by a bishop.
[62]See ‘History of Irish Music,’ W. H. Grattan Flood, Dublin, 1906. Notker was the author of the famousAntiphona de Morte, beginningMedia vita in morte sumus(In the midst of life we are in death), which was quickly adopted as a funeral anthem throughout Europe. Miraculous effects were attributed to it, and its use was so much abused that the council of Cologne (1316) forbade anybody to sing it who was not specially authorized by a bishop.
[63]Here should be noted one of the ways in which the Christian theorists misapplied the system of the Greeks. In Chapter IV we have seen that the Greeks did not consider pitch as in any way related to the character or ethos of the modes. Thisethoswas determined solely by the arrangement of the steps in the scale. The Christian theorists, on the other hand, though they still recognized the variety of character obtained by varying the distribution of steps in the scale, evidently allotted to the different modes a different final or pitch, and thus pitch came to influence the character of the modes. The modes might, however, still be transposed and sung at any pitch.
[63]Here should be noted one of the ways in which the Christian theorists misapplied the system of the Greeks. In Chapter IV we have seen that the Greeks did not consider pitch as in any way related to the character or ethos of the modes. Thisethoswas determined solely by the arrangement of the steps in the scale. The Christian theorists, on the other hand, though they still recognized the variety of character obtained by varying the distribution of steps in the scale, evidently allotted to the different modes a different final or pitch, and thus pitch came to influence the character of the modes. The modes might, however, still be transposed and sung at any pitch.
[64]This dreaded interval was called by churchmendiabolus in musica, and as such studiously avoided.
[64]This dreaded interval was called by churchmendiabolus in musica, and as such studiously avoided.