“Give now a pledge, be surety for me with thyself;Who is there that will strike hands with me?”
“Give now a pledge, be surety for me with thyself;Who is there that will strike hands with me?”
“Give now a pledge, be surety for me with thyself;Who is there that will strike hands with me?”
“Give now a pledge, be surety for me with thyself;
Who is there that will strike hands with me?”
The Hebrew wordtaq’a[763](תָּקַע) here translated “strike,” has also the meaning “to pierce” (Judg. 4 : 21) and “to blow through,” or “to drive through” (Num. 10 : 3); and Job’s question might be freely rendered; Who is there that will pierce [or that will clasp pierced] hands with me, in blood-friendship? Thus, suretyship grew out of blood-covenanting.
Again, in Zechariah 13 : 6, where the prophet foretells the moral reformation of Judah, there is a seeming reference to the pierced hands of blood-friendship. When one is suspected of being a professional prophet, by certain marks of cuttings between his hands, he declares that these are marks of his blood-covenant with his friends. “And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds [these cuttings] between thine hands? Then he shall answer, [They are] these [cuttings] with whichI was wounded [or stricken, or pierced] in the house of my friends [in the covenant of friendship].” If, indeed, the translation of the Revisers, “between thine arms,” were justified, the cuttings would still seem to be the cuttings of the blood-covenant (See pages13,45,supra).
It is a noteworthy fact, that among the Jews in Tunis, near the old Phœnician settlement of Carthage, the sign of a bleeding hand is still an honored and a sacred symbol, as if in recognition of the covenant-bond of their brotherhood and friendship. “What struck me most in all the houses,” says a traveler (Chevalier de Hesse-Wartegg) among these Jews, “was the impression of an open bleeding hand, on every wall of each floor. However white the walls, this repulsive [yet suggestive] sign was to be seen everywhere.”
How many times, in the New Testament epistles, does the idea show itself, of an inter-union of lives, between Christ and his disciples, and between these disciples and each other. “We, who are many, are one body in Christ, and severally members one of another” (Rom. 12 : 5). “We are members of his body” (Eph. 5 : 30). “We are members one of another” (Eph. 4 : 25). “Know ye not that your bodies are members of Christ?” (1 Cor. 6 : 15). “Ye are the body of Christ, and severally [are] members thereof” (1 Cor. 12 : 27).
It is in this truth of truths, concerning the possibility of an inter-union of the human life with the divine, through a common inter-bloodflow, that there is found a satisfying of the noblest heart yearnings of primitive man everywhere, and of the uttermost spiritual longings of the most advanced Christian believer, in the highest grade of intellectual and moral enlightenment. No attainment of evolution, or of development, has brought man’s latest soul-cry beyond the intimations of his earliest soul-outreaching.
“Take, dearest Lord, this crushed and bleeding heart,And lay it in thine hand, thy piercèd hand;That thine atoning blood may mix with mine,Till I and my Beloved are all one.”
“Take, dearest Lord, this crushed and bleeding heart,And lay it in thine hand, thy piercèd hand;That thine atoning blood may mix with mine,Till I and my Beloved are all one.”
“Take, dearest Lord, this crushed and bleeding heart,And lay it in thine hand, thy piercèd hand;That thine atoning blood may mix with mine,Till I and my Beloved are all one.”
“Take, dearest Lord, this crushed and bleeding heart,
And lay it in thine hand, thy piercèd hand;
That thine atoning blood may mix with mine,
Till I and my Beloved are all one.”