Chapter 4

[46b]These phrases are from Munro,Arch. and False Antiquities, pp. 138-139.

[47a]Munro, p. 139.

[47b]Munro,Prehistoric Scotland, p. 420.

[48]Munro, p. 130.

[49a]See page 246 of Dr. Munro’s article on Raised Beaches,Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. xxv. part 3.  The reference is to two Clyde canoes built of planks fastened to ribs, suggesting that the builder had seen a foreign galley, and imitated it.

[49b]Munro, pp. 138, 139.

[51a]Proceedings Scot. Soc. Ant.vol. xxxiv. p. 462.

[51b]Munro, p. 147.

[52a]Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot.1900-1901, p. 296.

[52b]Munro, p. 138.

[52c]These structures, of course, were of dry stone, without lime and mortar.  By what name we call them, “towers,” or “cairns,” is indifferent to me.

[54]Beda, book 1, chap. i.

[61]Proceedings Soc. Scot. Ant.1899-1900, vol. xxxiv. pp. 456-458.

[63]See Prof. Zimmer’sDas Mutterrecht der Pickten, Rhys’sCeltic Britain,Rhind Lectures, and inRoyal Commission’s Report on Wales, with myHistory of Scotland, vol. i. pp. 12, 14.

[64a]Bureau of Ethnology’s Report, 1896-97, p. 324.  See also the essay on “Indian Pictographs,”Report of Bureau, for 1888-89.

[64b]MSS. of Mr. Mullen, of Bourke, N.S.W., and of Mr. Charles Lang.

[64c]Scott, London, 1895.

[64d]Op. cit.p. 178.

[64e]Op. cit.p. 172.

[65]Munro, p. 246.

[66]Longmans.

[67]Munro, p. 177.

[69]Cartailhac,Ages Préhistoriques, p. 97.

[73a]L’Anthropologie, vol. xiv. p. 338.

[73b]Proc. S.A.S., 1878-1879.

[73c]Op. cit.pp. 208, 210.

[74]Bruce,ut supra, p. 446.

[75]Bureau of Ethnology,Report of1888-1889, p. 193.

[77]Munro, plate xv. p. 228, p. 249, cf. fig. 63, p. 249.

[78]Spencer and Gillen,Native Tribes of Central Australia, figs. 20, 21, 22, 133;Northern Tribes of Central Australia, figs. 89, 92, 80, 81.

[80a]I have no concern with an object, never seen by Dr. Munro, or by me, to my knowledge, but described as a “churinga”; inJournal of British Archaeological Association, Sept. 1904, fig. 4, Munro, p. 246.

[80b]Munro, p. 246.

[81]See Spencer and Gillen,Central Tribes, fig. 21, 6;Northern Tribes, fig. 87.

[82a]Munro, p. 55, referring toAncient Lake Dwellings, fig. 13, nos. 17, 18, 19.

[82b]Proceedings Scot. Soc. Ant.1902, p. 168, fig. 4, 1903.

[82c]Lockhart, iv. 208.

[84a]Munro, p. 247.

[84b]Munro, fig. 62, p. 248.

[85a]Début de l’Art, pp. 124-138.

[85b]Munro, p. 260.

[85c]Munro, p. 230.

[85d]Munro, pp. 204, 205.

[86]Munro, p. 260.

[88]Op. cit.p. 172.

[89]Nicholson,Folk Lore of East Yorkshire, p. 87, Hull, 1890.

[91]Haddon,The Study of Man, pp. 276, 327.

[95a]Man, 1904, no. 22.

[95b]For the Caithness brochs, see Dr. Joseph Anderson,Proc. Soc. Scot. Ant., 1900-1901, pp. 112-148.

[95c]Native Tribes of North Central Australia, Spencer and Gillen, p. 274, 1894.

[96]Northern Tribes, p. 268, fig. 87, 1904.

[97a]Glasgow Herald, letter of October 17th, 1903.

[97b]Munro, pp. 251-253.

[100a]Vol. vii. p. 50, cf.Proceedings Scots Society of Antiquaries, vol. vi. p. 112, and, in Appendix to the same volume, p. 42, plate xix.

[100b]Anderson,Scotland in Pagan Times, p. 88.

[101]Munro, p. 249, fig. 63.

[102a]Les Ages Préhistoriques, p. 100; cf. J. L. de Vasconcellos’Religiões da Lusitania, vol. i. p. 69.  Lisboa, 1897.

[102b]Antiguedades Monumentaes do Algarve, i. 298.  Estacio da Veiga, Lisboa, 1886.

[102c]Religiões, i. 69-70.

[103a]Antiguedades, vol. ii. 429-481.

[103b]Religiões, i. 168.

[103c]L’Anthropologie, vol. xiv. p. 542.

[104]By Gongora de Martinez.  Madrid, 1868.

[107]Munro, pp. 232, 234.

[108]Munro, p. 228.

[109]Tribes of Central Australia, pp. 141-145.

[111]Munro, pp. 260, 261.

[112a]Munro, p. 158, pp. 223-227.

[112b]Munro, p. 261.

[114]Op. cit., p. 111-114.

[115]Proceedings, vol. xxiii. p. 272.

[116a]Munro, p. 255.

[116b]Ibid.

[116c]Native Tribes of Central Australia, p. 150.

[117a]L’Anthropologie, vol. xiv. p. 362.

[117b]Cf. Munro, p. 57.

[118]Op. cit., p. 84.

[119a]Munro, p. 230.

[119b]L’Anthropologie, vol. xiv. p. 548.  Dr. Laloy’s review of Mr. Y. Koganei,Ueber die Urbewohner von Japan.  Tokyo, 1903.

[120a]Munro, p. 141.

[120b]See Cappart,Primitive Art in Egypt, p. 154, translated by A. S. Griffiths.  Grevel, London, 1905.

[121a]Cappart, p. 90, fig. 60, p. 92, fig. 62.

[121b]Ibid. p. 95, fig. 66.

[121c]Munro, p. 80.

[121d]Op. cit., p. 449.

[122]Munro, p. 231.

[123a]Munro, p. 262.

[123b]Dr. Murray in Munro, pp. 257-258.

[124a]Munro, p. 148.

[124b]Munro, p. 264.

[124c]Munro, p. 262.

[124d]Munro, p. 220.

[125]Munro, pp. 231-235.

[127]Munro, pp. 56-73.

[128]Portugalia, i. p. 646.

[130]See Sr. Severo inPortugalia, vol. ii. part i., 1905.

[132]All the specimens of this group were disinterred from the ruins of this fort.

[137]See an interesting and well-illustrated paper inReport of Bureau on Ethnology, U.S., vol. ii.

[139]Munro,Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., 1900-1901, pp. 291-292.


Back to IndexNext