The salient features that characterize the plays of Plautus include both his consciously employed means of producing his comic effects, and the peculiarities and abnormalities that evidence his attitude of mind in writing them. We should make bold to catalogue them as follows:
Let us illustrate these points by typical passages and endeavor to insert such stage-directions as would indicate how the most telling effects could be produced and hence aid the reader in visualizing the actual performance.
1. Bombast and mock-heroics.
It is a little difficult to sublimate this entirely from burlesque, but its true nature is instanced by the opening lines of theMiles, where the vainglorious Pyrgopolinices, with many a sweep and strut, addresses his attendants, who are probably staggering under the weight of an enormous shield:
"Have a care that the effulgence of my shield be brighter than e'er the sun's rays in a cloudless sky: when the time for action comes and the battle's on, I intend it shall dazzle the eyesight o' m' foes. (Patting his sword). Verily I would condole with this m' sword, lest he lament and be cast down in spirit, forasmuch as now full long hath he hung idle by m' side, thirsting, poor lad, to meet his fellow 'mongst the foe," and so on.
In line with this, a simulation of the military is a favorite device. So we find Pseudolus addressing the audience in ringing blustering tones and with grandiose gesture (Ps.584 ff.):
"It now becomes my aim today to lay siege to this town and capture it." (Ballio the procurer is the town). "I shall hurl all my legions against it. If I take it, ... good luck to you, my citizens, for part of the booty shall be yours."
This finds a close counterpart in theMil.219 ff., a passage which West110thinks was deliberately inserted to rouse the populace into demanding that Scipio be at once despatched to Africa.
Periplecomenus is urging Palaestrio to find a stratagem. Actually he probably addresses the pit:
"Don't you see that the enemy are upon you and investing your rear? Call a council of war, reach out for stores and reinforcements in this crisis: haste, haste, no time to waste! Make a detour through some pass, forestall your foes, beleaguer them, protect our troops! Cut off the enemy's base of supplies!" etc.
Whether this passage had an ulterior purpose or not, the motif is frequent.111So we find Chrysalus inBac.925 ff. holding the stage for an entire scene with an elaborate comparison of himself to Ulysses, the brains of the Greek host, overcoming his master Nicobulus who represents Priam.
In general the mocking assumption of an heroic attitude recurs with sufficient frequency to stamp it as a staple of comic effect. Many passages would become tiresome and meaningless instead of amusing unless so interpreted. The soliloquy of Mnesilochus inBac.500 ff. could be made interesting only by turgid ranting. Similarly inBac.530 ff. and 612 ff.112
2. Horse-play and slap-sticks.
By this we mean what can in nowise be so clearly defined as by "rough-house." For instance, the turbulent Euclio inAul.delivers bastings impartially to variousdramatis personaeand as a climax drives the cooks and music-girl pell-mell out of the house, doubtless accompanied by deafening howling and clatter (415 ff.). Similarly in theCas.(875 ff.) Chalinus routs Olympio and the lecherous Lysidamus. We may well imagine that such scenes were preceded as well as accompanied by a fearful racket within (a familiar device of our low comedy and extravaganza), the effect probably heightened by tempestuousmelodramaon thetibiae, as both the scenes cited are incanticum.
In theMen.we are treated to a free fight, in which the valiant Messenio routs thelorariiby vigorous punches, while Menaechmus plants his fist in one antagonist's eye (Men.1011 ff.):
(Menaechmus of Epidamnus is seized bylorarii; as he struggles, Messenio, slave of Menaechmus Sosicles, rushes into the fray to his rescue). "MES. I say! Gouge out that fellow's eye, the one that's got you by the shoulder, master. Now as for these rotters, I'll plant a crop of fists on their faces. (Lays about.) By Heaven, you'll be everlastingly sorry for the day you tried to carry my master off. Let go!
MEN. (Joining in with a will.) I've got this fellow by the eye!
MES. Bore it out! A hole's good enough for his face! You villians, you thieves, you robbers! (General melée. Lorarii weaken.)
LOR. We're done for! Oh Lord, please!
MES. Let go then!
MEN. What right had you to lay hands on me? Give them a good beating up! (Lorarii break and scatter wildly under the ferocious onslaught.)
MES. Come, clear out! To the devil with you all! That foryou! (Strikes.) You're the last; here'syourreward! (Strikes again.)"
The lines themselves are sufficiently graphic and need but little annotation. Other pugilistic activities crop up at not infrequent intervals in the text,113and inPs.135 ff. Ballio generously plies the whip. In the lacuna of theAmph.after line 1034, Mercury probably bestows a drenching on Amphitruo.114InAs.III. 3, especially 697 ff., Libanus makes his master Argyrippus "play horsey" with him, doubtless with indelicate buffonery. With invariable energy, even so simple a matter as knocking on doors is made the excuse for raising a violent disturbance, as inAmph.1019 f. and 1025: Paene effregisti, fatue, foribus cardines.115And this idea is actually parodied inAs.384 ff. No, Plautus did not allow his public to languish for want of noise.
3. Burlesque, farce and extravagance of situation and dialogue.
Under this head we include such conscious strivings for comic as are frankly and plainly exaggerated and hyper-natural.
a. True burlesque.
This is in effect pure parody, cartooning. Patent burlesque of tragedy appears inTrin.820 ff. (Charmides returns from abroad.)
"CHAR. To Neptune, ruler of the deep, and puissant brother unto Jove and Nereus, do I in joy and gladness cry my praises and gratefully proclaim my gratitude; and to the briny waves, who held me in their power, yea, even my chattels and my very life, and from their realms restored me to the city of my birth," etc., etc.
To tickle the ears of the groundlings, this must have been delivered in grandiloquent mimicry with all the paraphernalia of the tragic style. Horace notes a kindred manifestation of this tendency (to which he himself is pleasingly addicted), inEp.II. 3.93 f.:
Interdum tamen et vocem comoedia tollitIratusque Chremes tumido delitigat ore.
Tragic burlesque is again beautifully exemplified inPs.702 ff. The versatile Pseudolus after a significant aside: "I'll address the fellow in high-sounding words," says to his master Calidorus:
"Hail! Hail! Thee, thee, O mighty ruler, thee do I beseech who art lord over Pseudolus. Thee do I seek that thou mayst obtain thrice three times triple delights in three various ways, joys earned by three tricks and three tricksters, cunningly won by treachery, fraud and villainy, which in this little sealed missive have I but erstwhile brought to thee....
CHAR. The rascal's spouting like a tragedian."
When Sosia, in the first scene ofAmph.(203 ff.), turgidly describes the battle between the Thebans and Teleboans, he is parodying the Messenger of tragedy. Another echo from tragedy is heard at the end of the play, when Jupiter appears in the role of deus ex machina.116
Burlesque of character and calling puts in an occasional appearance. The recreant Sosia inAmph.958 ff. mimics the dutiful slave.As.259 ff. contains an ironical treatment of augury, while in 751 ff. the poet has his satirical fling at the legal profession.
b. True farce.
This is of course the comedy of situation and finds its mainstay in mistaken identity. TheMen.andAmph.with their doubles are farce-comedies proper, but the element of farce forms the motive power of nearly all the plots; for example, the shuffling-up of Acropolistis, Telestis and thefidicinainEp., the quarrel between Mnesilochus and Pistoclerus inBac.resulting from the former's belief that his friend had stolen his sweetheart, the exchange of names between Tyndarus and Philocrates inCap., the entrapping of Demaenetus with themeretrixat the dénouement ofAs., etc., etc. It is understood, we presume, that the modern farce occupies no exalted position in the comic scale, is distinguished by the grotesquerie of its characters, incidents and dialogue, and is indulgently permitted to stray far from the paths of realism. Even in Shakespearian farce, note the exaggerated antics of the two Dromios in "The Comedy of Errors." It is significant then that farce is a staple of our plays.
The farcical element is strikingly exemplified inAmph.365-462, where Mercury persuades Sosia that he is not himself. Impersonation and assumption of a role is another noteworthy and frequent medium of plot motivation. InAs.407 ff. Leonida tries to palm himself off as theatriensis. Note the violent efforts of the two slaves to wheedle the cunning ass-dealer (449 ff.). InCas.815 ff. Chalinus enters disguised as the blushing bride. InMen.828 ff. Menaechmus Sosicles pretends madness in a clever scene of uproarious humor. In theMil.(411 ff.) Philocomasium needs only to change clothing to appear in the role of her own hypothetical twin sister, and in 874 ff. and 1216 ff. themeretrixplaysmatrona. Sagaristio and the daughter of thelenoimpersonate Persians (Per.549 ff.), Collabiscus becomes a Spartan (Poen.578 ff.), Simia as Harpax gets Ballio's money (Ps.905 ff.), the sycophant is garbed as messenger (Trin.843 ff.), Phronesium elaborately pretends to be a mother (Truc.499 ff.). A swindle is almost invariably the object in view. But we have said enough on this score: no one who knows the plays at all can fail to recognize the predominance of farce. Compare on the modern stage the sudden appearance of "the long-lost cousin from Chicago."
c. Extravagances obviously unnatural and merely for the sake of fun.
This group of course often contains marked features of burlesque and farce, and hence shows a close kinship with the foregoing.
The extravagance of the love-sick swain is a fruitful source of this species of caricature. The ridiculous Calidorus, always wearing his heart on his sleeve, rolls his eyes, brushes away a tear and says (Ps.38 ff.): "But for a short space have I been e'en as a lily of the field. Suddenly sprang I up, as suddenly I withered." The irreverent Pseudolus replies: "Oh, shut up while I read the letter over." Calidorus finds his counterpart in Phaedromus of theCur., who, accompanied by his slave, approaches milady's abode (Cur.10 ff.):
"PH. (In languishing accents, with eyes cast upward): Shall I not take sweets to the sweet: what is culled by the toil of the busy bees to my own little honey?... (They advance to milady's doorway which he sprinkles with wine, 88 ff.): Come, drink, ye portals of pleasure, quaff and deign to be propitious unto me.
PALINURUS SER. (Addressing the door with mimicry of Phaedromus' airs.) Do you want some olives or sweetmeats or capers?
PH. (Continuing.) Arouse your portress; hither send her unto me. (Lavishes the wine.)
PAL. (In great alarm, grasping his arm.) You're spilling the wine! What's got hold of you?
PH. Unhand me! (Gently shakes himself loose.) Lo! The temple of joys untold is opening. Did not the hinge creak? 'Tis charming!
PAL. (Turning aside in disgust.) Why don't you give it a kiss?"
In each case the impertinent slave provides the foil. When the lovers succeed in meeting, they are interlocked in embrace from 172 to 192, probably invested with no small amount of suggestive "business." This would doubtless hardly be tolerated by the "censor" today. Another variety of lover's extravagance is the lavishing of terms of endearment, as we find inCas.134 ff.117
When this feature of "extravagance" enters the situation instead of the dialogue, we have episodes such as the final scene of thePs., where the name character is irrelevantly introduced (1246) in a state of intoxication which, with copious belching in Simo's face, culminates in a rebellion of the overloaded stomach (1294). We can scarcely doubt that such business was carried out in ultra-graphic detail and rewarded by copious guffaws from the populace. In sharp contrast to this, the drunkenness of Callidamates inMost.313 ff. is depicted with unusual artistry, but still from the very nature of such a scene it may be labeled "extravagant."
Manifestation of violent anger is another source of exaggerated stage business.Ep.512 ff. should be interpreted somewhat as follows:
"(The deluded Periphanes has just discovered that the fidicina is an impostor and not his daughter.) FID. (Sweetly.) Do you want me for anything else?
PER. (Stamping foot and shaking fists in a passion.) The foul fiend take you to utter perdition! Clear out, and quickly too!
FID. (In alarm.) Won't you give me back my harp?
PER. Nor harp nor pipes! So hurry up and get out of here, if you know what's good for you!
FID. (Stamping her foot in tearful rage.) I'll go, but you'll have to give them back later just the same and it will be all the worse for you.
PER. (Striding up and down in wildest anger.) What!... shall I let her go unpunished? Nay, even if I have to lose as much again, I'll lose it rather than let myself be mocked and despoiled with impunity!" and so on.118
Other random scenes that may be classed as "extravagant" are found in Strobilus' cartoon of Euclio (Aul.300 ff.), Demipho's discovery in the distance of a mythical bidder for the girl (Mer.434 ff.), Charinus' playing "horsey" and taking a trip in his imaginary car (Mer.930 ff.), and the loud "boo-hoo" to which Philocomasium gives vent (Mil.1321 ff.). These all might be classed under either "farce" or "burlesque," but they seem to come more exactly under the kindred head of "extravagance."
A familiar figure in modern farce-comedy is the comic conspirator with finger on lip, tiptoeing round in fear of listeners. He finds his prototype inTrin.(146 ff.):
"(Callicles and Megaronides converse.)
CAL. (In a mysterious whisper.) Look around a bit and make sure there's nobody spying on us--and please look around every few seconds. (They pause and peer in every direction, perhaps creeping round on tiptoe.)
MEG. Now, I am all ears.
CAL. When you're through, I'll talk. (Pauses and nods.) Just before Charmides went abroad, he showed me a treasure, (stops and looks over his shoulders) in his house here, in one of the rooms. (Starts, as if at a noise.) Look around! (They repeat the search and return again.)
MEG. There's nobody."119
Another old stage friend is the detected plotter trying to lie out of an embarrassing situation. He is lineally descended from Tranio in theMost.Tranio has just induced his master Theopropides to pay forty minae to the money-lender on the pretext that Theopropides' son Philolaches has bought a house (659 ff.):
"TH. In what neighborhood did my son buy this house?
TR. (Aside to audience in comic despair, with appropriate gesture.) See there now! I'm a goner!
TH. (Impatiently.) Will you answer my question?
TR. Oh yes, but (Stammering and displaying symptoms of acute embarrassment) I--I'm trying to think of the owner's name. (Groans.)
TH. Well, hurry up and remember it!
TR. (Rapidly, aside.) I can't see anything better to do than tell him his son bought the house of our next-door neighbor here. (With a shrug.) Thunder, I've heard that asteaminglie is the best kind. (Mock-heroically.) 'Tis the will of the gods, my mind's made up.
TH. (Who has been frowning and stamping in impatience.) Well, well, well! Haven't you thought of it yet?
TR. (Aside.) Curses on him!... (Finally turning and bursting out suddenly.) It's our next-door neighbor here--your son bought the house from him. (He sees that the lie goes and sighs with relief.)"120
Another variation on this theme is the futile effort of the plotter to get rid of a character armed with incriminating evidence. Again we quoteMost.(573 ff.), where Tranio is conversing with Theopropides. The money-lender from whom young Philolaches has borrowed appears on the other side of the stage. Tranio espies him. He must keep him away from the old man. With a hurried excuse he flies across to meet Misargyrides.
"TR. (Taking Misargyrides' arm and attempting to steer him off-stage.) I was never so glad to see a man in my life.
MIS. (Suspiciously, holding back.) What's the matter?
TR. (Confidentially.) Just step this way. (Looks back apprehensively at Theopropides, who is regarding them suspiciously.)
MIS. (In a loud and offensive voice.) Won't my interest be paid?
TR. I know you have a good voice; don't shout so loud.
MIS. (Louder.) Hang it, but Iwillshout!
TR. (Groans and glances over shoulder again.) Run along home, there's a good fellow. (Urges him toward exit.)", etc.
Tranio has a chance for very lively business: a sickly smile for the usurer, lightning glances of apprehension towards Theopropides, with an occasional intimate groan aside to the audience. Other farcical scenes of the many that may be cited as calling for particularly vivacious business and gesture are, e.g.,Cas.621 ff., where Pardalisca befools Lysidamus by timely fainting,Rud.414 ff., where Sceparnio flirts with Ampelisca, and the quarrel scene,Rud.485 ff.121
The last four passages quoted in translation are by no means lacking in artistic humor and a measure of reality, but they imply a pronounced heightening of the actions and emotions of everyday life and lose their humor unless presented in the broad spirit that stamps them as belonging to the plane of farce. We now pass on to motives where the dialogue aims at effects manifestly unnatural and where verisimilitude is sacrificed to the joke, as we have seen it is in the employment of "bombast," "true burlesque," etc.
The first of these motives is a stream of copious abuse, as inPer.406 ff., where Toxilusservosand Dordaluslenoexchange Rabelaisian compliments.
"TOX. (Hopping about with rabid gestures.) You filthy pimp, you mud-heap, you common dung-hill, you besmirched, corrupt, law-breaking decoy, you public sewer, ... robber, mobber, jobber, ...!
DOR. (Who has been dancing around in fury, shaking his fist until exhausted by his paroxysms.) Wait--till--(Puffing)--I--get--my breath--I'll--answer you! You dregs of the rabble, you slave-brothel, you 'white-slave' freer, you sweat-of-the-lash, you chain gang, you king of the treadmill, ... you eat-away, steal-away run-away....!" etc.122
Perhaps we have here the forerunner of the shrewish wife in modern vaudeville, who administers to her shrinking consort a rapid-fire tongue-lashing. Another phase of this profuse riot of words appears in the formidable Persian name that Sagaristio, disguised as a Persian, adopts in thePer.(700 ff.):
"DORDALUS. What's your name?
SAG. Listen then, and you shall hear: False-speaker-us Girl-seller-son Much-o'-nothing-talk-son Money-gouge-out-son Talk-up-to you-son Coin-wheedle-out-son What-I-once-get-son Never-give-up-son: there you are!
DOR. (With staring eyes and gasping breath.) Ye Gods! That's a variegated name of yours!
SAG. (With a superior wave of the hand.) It's the Persian fashion."
The second point in this category is own cousin to the above. We should label it persistent interruption and repetition. An excellent instance isTrin.582 ff., when Stasimus, Lesbonicus and Philto have just hatched a plot. Philto departs.
"LES. (To Stasimus.) You attend to my instructions. I'll be there presently. Tell Callicles to meet me.
ST. Now you just clear out! (Pushes him after Philto.)
LES. (Calls out as he is being shoved away.) Tell him to see what has to be done about the dowry.
ST. Clear out!
LES. (Raising his voice.) For I'm determined not to marry her off without a dowry.
ST. Won't you clear out?
LES. (Still louder.) And I won't let her suffer harm by reason.----
ST. Get out, I say!
LES. (Shouts.)--of my carelessness.
ST. Clear out!
LES. It seems right that my own sins--
ST. Clear out!
LES.--should affect me alone.
ST. Clear out!
LES. (Mock heroically.) Oh father, shall I ever behold you again?
ST. Out, out, out! (With a final shove.) (Exit Lesbonicus.) At last, I 've got him away! (Breathes hard.)"
The fun, if fun there be, lies in the hammer-like repetition of "I modo," a sort of verbal buffoonery. A clever actor could din this with telling effect. The device is employed several times. InMost.974 ff. the word isaio, inPer.482 ff.credo, inPoen.731 ff.quippini, inPs.484 ff. ναι γάρ, inRud.1212 ff.licetand 1269 ff.censeo. The last two examples are the lengthiest.123
The third of these motives is the introduction of clearly unnatural dialogue, wholly incidental and foreign to the action, for the sake of lugging in a joke. TheAs.(38 ff.) yields the following conversation between Demaenetussenexand his slave Libanus:
"LI. By all that's holy, as a favor to me, spit out the words you have uttered.
DE. All right, I'll be glad to oblige you. (Coughs.)
LI. Now, now, get it right up! (Pats him on the back.)
DE. More? (Coughs.)
LI. Gad, yes, please! Right from the bottom of your throat: more still! (Pats.)
DE. Well, how far down then?
LI. (Unguardedly.) Down to Hades is my wish!
DE. I say, look out for trouble!
LI. (Diplomatically.) For your wife, I mean, not for you.
DE. For that speech I bestow upon you freedom from punishment."124
The childish bandying of words inTruc.858 ff. is egregiously tiresome in the reading, but in action could have been made to produce a modicum of amusement if presented in the broad burlesque spirit that we believe was almost invariably employed. This gives us a clue to the next topic.
This includes peculiarities that have usually been commented on as weaknesses or conventions, or else been given up as hopeless incongruities, but which we hope to prove also yield their quota of amusement if clownishly performed. The foremost of these is the famous
1. Running Slave or Parasite.
We all know him: rushing madly cross stage at top-speed (if we take the literal word of the text for it), with girded loins, in search of somebody right under his nose, the while unburdening himself of exhaustive periods that, however great the breadth of the Roman stage, would carry him several times across and back: as Curculio in 279 ff.:
"Make way for me, friends and strangers, while I carry out my duty here. Run, all of you, scatter and clear the road! I'm in a hurry and I don't want to butt into anybody with my head, or elbow, or chest, or knee.... And there's none so rich as can stand in my way, ... none so famous but down he goes off the sidewalk and stands on his head in the street," and so on for ten lines or more. After he has found his patron Phaedromus, he is apparently so exhausted that he cries: "Hold me up, please, hold me up! (Wobbles and falls panting into Phaedromus' arms.)
PH.... Get him a chair ... quick!"
When Leonida enters (As.267 ff.) as the running slave, he is still out of breath at 326-7! Stasimus inTrin.1008 ff., though his mission is also proclaimed as desperately urgent, pauses to declaim on public morals!
Considerable light has been thrown upon this subject recently by the dissertation of Weissman,De servi currentis persona apud comicos Romanes(Giessen, 1911), though his explanation of themodus operandiis inconclusive. Langen has commented on it at some length,125but offers no solution. Weise frankly admits:126"Wie sie gelaufen sind, ist ein Rätsel fur uns." LeGrand127follows Weise's conclusion that it is an imitation from the Greek and in support of this instances Curculio's use, while running, of the presumed translations from the Greek:agoranomus,demarchus, etc. He also cites as parallels some unconvincing phrases from fragments of New Comedy, while developing an ingenious theory that the device is a heritage from the Greek orchestra, where it could have been performed with a hippodrome effect. Terence berates the practice,128but makes use of it himself.129
Weissman's conclusions are worth a summary. He notes the following as the usual essential concomitants: 1. It is mentioned in the text that the slave is on the run. 2. He is the bearer of news of the moment; 3. He fails to recognize other characters on stage; 4. He is halted by the very man he is so violently seeking. He cites as the genuine occurrences of theservusorparasitus currens, besides the passages mentioned above,Cap.781 ff.,Ep.1 ff., 192 ff.,Mer.111 ff.,Per.272 ff.,St.274 ff. Furthermore, he argues convincingly that this was an independent Roman development without a prototype on the Greek stage and neatly refutes Weise and LeGrand by proving that there are no extant Greek fragments sufficient to furnish a ground for any but the most tenuous argument. Above all, he correctly interprets the poet's aim with the dictum: "Praeterquam quod hac persona optime utitur ad actionem bene continuandam id maxime spectat ut per eamspectatorum risumcaptet." And this from a German youth of twenty-two!
It is in his attempt to explain the mechanism that we believe Weissman fails. He essays an exegesis of each passage, though the separate explanations are naturally similar. It will suffice to quote one, that toAs.267 ff.: "Hoc nullo modo aliter mihi declarari posse videtur nisi sic: Oratio Leonidae currentis maior est quam ut arbitrari possimus currentem semper eum habuisse eam. Ex versu 290 Leonidam de celeritate sua remisisse plane apparet. Quod semel solum eum fecisse cum non satis mihi esse videatur, saepius--bis vel ter--per breve tempus eum cursum suum interrupisse, circumspexisse, Libanum autem non spectavisse (hoc consilium poetae erat, licentia poetica est) et hoc modo per totam scaenam cursum suum direxisse arbitror."
It will be observed that for lack of any tangible evidence he very properly makes use of subjective reasoning. Now it has long been the opinion of the writer that the maximum of comic effect (and that this was the purpose of theservus currensthere can surely be no doubt) could best be obtained by the actor's making a violent and frenzied pretense of running while scarcely moving from the spot. Consider the ludicrous spectacle of the rapidly moving legs and the flailing arms, with the actor's face turned toward the audience, as he declaims sonorously of his haste to perform his vital errand, while making but a snail's progress. Truly then his plea of exhaustion would not be without excuse! This is an explanation at once simpler, more potentially comic, more in accord with what we predicate as the spirit of Plautus, and furthermore we have seen roars of laughter created by the similar device of a low comedian in a modern extravaganza. Taking advantage of the same subjective license, we see nothing in Weissman's theory to offset our opinion. But, what is more, our subjective reconstruction is given color by a shred of tangible evidence. Suetonius (Tib.38) refers to a popular quip on the emperor that compares him to an actor on the classic Greek stage: "Biennio continuo post ademptum imperium pedem porta non extulit; ... ut vulgo iam per iocum Callip(p)ides vocaretur, quem cursitare ac ne cubiti quidem mensuram progredi proverbio Graeco notatum est." That this Callipides was the ὑποϗριτής mentioned by Xenophon (Sym.III. 11), Plutarch (Ages.21 andApophth. Lacon.: s. v.Ages.), Cicyero (Ad. Att.XIII. 12) and possibly by Aristotle (Poet.26.), seems highly plausible. Compare thesaltus fullonius(Sen.Ep.15.4).
Most amusing of all is Plautus' introduction of a parody on the parody, when Mercury rushes in post-haste crying (Amph.984 ff.):
"Make way, give way, everybody, clear the way! I tell you all: don't you get so bold as to stand in my road. For, egad! I'd like to know why I, a god, shouldn't have as much right to threaten the rabble as a mere slave in the comedies!"
And perhapsSt.307 is a joke on the running slave: Sed spatium hoc occidit: brevest curriculo: quam me paenitet? That violent haste was considered a slavish trait is evidenced byPoen.523-3.
2. Wilful blindness.
In the scene recently quoted (Cur.279 ff.), Curculio, after his violent exertions in search of his patron, is for a time apparently unable to discover him, though he is on the stage all the time. This species of blindness must be wilfully designed as a burlesque effect and again finds its echo in low comedy types of today. The breadth and depth of the Roman stage alone will not account for this either; indeed, its very size could be utilized to heighten the humor, as the actor peers hither and yon in every direction but the right one. So Curculio (front) may pass directly by Phaedromus (rear) without seeing him, to the huge delight of the audience, and turn back again, while saying (301 ff.):
"Is there anybody who can point out Phaedromus, my guardian angel, to me? The matter's very urgent: I must find this chap at once.
PALINURUS. (To Phaedromus.) It's you he's looking for.
PH. What do you say we speak to him? Hello, Curculio, I want you!
CUR. (Stopping and again looking vainly round.) Who's calling? Who says "Curculio"?
PH. Somebody that wants to see you.
CUR. (At last recognizing him when almost on top of him.) Ah! You don't want to see me any more than I want to see you."
Acanthio inMer.130 ff. is still more blind to the presence of Charinus and raises a deal more fuss, as he enters in the wildest haste looking for Charinus, who is of course in plain sight. Acanthio, with labored breathing and the remark that he would never make a piper, probably passes by Charinus and goes to the house.
"AC. What am I standing here for, anyway? I'll make splinters of these doors without a single qualm. (Hammers violently. Charinus approaches, vainly trying to attract his attention.) Open up, somebody! Where's my master Charinus, at home or out? (Still hammering.) Isn't anybody supposed to have the job of tending door?
CH. (Shouting.) Here I am, Acanthio! You're looking for me, aren't you?
AC. (Still punishing the door.) I never saw such slovenly management.
CH. (Finally grabbing and shaking him.) What the deuce has got hold of you?"130And so in the case of practically all theservi currentes.
The opening scene of thePer.(13 ff.) between two slaves apparently unable to distinguish each other's features from opposite sides of the stage affords an opportunity for a similar species of farcical by-play. Toxilus and Sagaristio stroll slowly in from the different side-entrances, alternately soliloquizing. Suddenly, when probably fairly close, both look up and peer curiously at each other:
"TOX. (Shading his eyes with his hand.) Who's that standing over there?
SAG. Who's this standing over here?
TOX. Looks like Sagaristio.
SAG. I bet it's my friend Toxilus.
TOX. He's the fellow, all right.
SAG. That's the chap, I'm sure.
TOX. I'll go over to him.
SAG. I'll go up and speak to him. (They draw closer.)
TOX. Sagaristio, I hope the gods are good to you.
SAG. Toxilus, I hope the gods give you everything you want. How are you?
TOX. So so."131
Note that this iscanticumand the effect of the two "sing-songing" slaves on the audience must have been much the same as, upon us, the spectacle of a vaudeville "duo," entering from opposite wings and singing perchance a burlesque of grand opera at each other.
3. Adventitious entrance.
This is of a piece with the above, but is usually due to a weakness of composition, to the goddess Τύχη, who is the presiding deity of the plots of New Comedy.132However, there are times when appreciable fun can be extracted from this, if the actor speak in a bland jocular tone, taking the audience into his confidence, asTrin.400 f.:
"PHILTO. But the door of the house to which I was going is opening. Isn't that nice? Lesbonicus, the very man I'm looking for, is coming out with his slave."
AndAul.176 f.:
"MEGADORUS. I'd like to see Euclio, if he's at home. Ah, here he comes! He's on his way home from some place or other."133
We believe that enough has been said to prove that the favorite devices of the lower types of modern stage-production form the back-bone of Plautus' methods of securing his comic effects. Let us pass on without more ado to a discussion of points that establish equally well that he was careless of every other consideration but the eliciting of laughter.
1. Asides and soliloquies.
As it is often important for the audience to know the thoughts of stage characters, the aside and the soliloquy in all species of dramatic composition have always been recognized as the only feasible conventional mode of conveying them. According to the strictest canons of dramatic art, the ideally constructed play should be entirely free from this weakness. Mr. Gillette is credited with having written in "Secret Service" the first aside-less play. But this is abnormal and rather an affectation of technical skill. The aside is an accepted convention. But in the plays of Plautus we
have a profuse riot of solo speeches and passages that transcends the conventional and becomes a gross weakness of composition, pointing plainly to a poverty of technique and hence further strengthening the conception of entertainment as the author's sole purpose. And often too, as we shall point out, this very form can be used for amusement. To attempt a complete collection of these passages would mean a citation of hundreds of lines, comprising a formidable percentage of all the verses.
And furthermore, the Plautine character is not so tame and spiritless as merely to think aloud. He has a fondness for actual conversation with himself that shows a noble regard for the value of his own society. This is attested by many passages, such asAmph.381: Etiam muttis?;Aul.52: At ut scelesta sola secum murmurat;Aul.190: Quid tu solus tecum loquere?;Bac.773: Quis loquitur prope?;Cap.133: Quis hic loquitur?134
One character standing aside and commenting on the main action is a familiar situation and often productive of good fun. An excellent example isMost.166 ff., where Philematium is performing her conventionally out-door toilet with the aid of her duenna Scapha. Philolaches stands on the other side of the stage and interjects remarks:
"PHILEM. Look at me please, Scapha dear; is this gown becoming? I want to please Philolaches, the apple of my eye....
SC. Why deck yourself out, when your charm lies in your charming manners? It isn't gowns that lovers love, but what bellies out the gowns.
PHILO. (Aside.) God bless me, but Scapha's clever; the hussy has horse-sense....
PHILEM. (Pettishly.) Well, then?
SC. What is it?
PHILEM. Look me over anyhow and see how this becomes me.
SC. The grace of your figure makes everything you wear becoming.
PHILO. (Aside.) Now for that speech, Scapha, I'll give you some present before the day is out--and so on for a whole long scene.
The quips are amusing in an evident burlesque spirit. Such a scene was easily done on the broad Roman stage, whether it was a heritage from the use of the orchestra in Greek comedy, as LeGrand thinks,135or not. In similar vein, clever by-play on the part of the cunning Palaestrio would make a capital scene out ofMil. 1037 ff.136A perfectly unnatural but utterly amusing scene of the same type isAmph. 153-262, where Mercury apostrophizes his fists, and the quaking Sosia (cross-stage) is frightened to a jelly at the prospect of his early demise. In Cap. 966, Ilegio, staid gentleman that he is, introduces an exceeding "rough" remark in the middle of a serious scene. The aside of Pseudolus inPs. 636 f.could be rendered as a good-natured burlesque as follows:
"HARPAX. What's your name?
PS. (Hopping forward and addressing audience with hand over mouth.) The pander has a slave named Surus. I'll say I'm he. (Hopping back and addressing Harpax.) I'm Surus." Many other scenes were doubtless rendered by one character's thus stepping aside and confiding his ideas to the spectators, as for exampleAul. 194 ff.andTrin. 895 ff.Often our characters blurt out their inmost thoughts to the public, as inCas. 937 ff., with eavesdroppers conveniently placed, else what would become of the plot?
The soliloquy is constantly used to keep the audience acquainted with the advance of the plot137, or to paint in narrative intervening events that connect the loose joints of the action. This is of course wholly inartistic, but may often find its true office in keeping a noisy, turbulent and uneducated audience aware of "what is going on." In many cases the soliloquy is in the nature of a reflection on the action and seems to bear all the ear-marks of a heritage from the original function of the tragic chorus138. It devolved upon the actor by sprightly mimicry to relieve, in these scenes, the tedium that appeals to the reader. So inCap.909 ff. thecanticumof thepuerbecomes more than a mere stopgap, if he acts out vividly the violence of Ergasilus; and inBac.1067 ff. the soliloquy would acquire humor, if confidentially directed at the audience. InAs.127 ff., as Argyrippus berates thelenawithin, it must be delivered with an abundance of pantomime.
2. Lengthy monodies, monologues and episodical specialties.
Frequently the soliloquy takes the form of a long solo passage directed at the audience, while the action halts for a whole scene to allow the actor to regale his public with the poet's views on the sins of society, economic topics of the day, or topics of the by-gone days in Athens, and the like. The resemblance to the interpolated song and dance of musical comedy is most striking. The comparison is the more apt, as about two-thirds of the illustrative scenes referred to in the next paragraph are incanticum. It is a pity that the comic chorus had disappeared, or the picture were complete. That it is often on the actor's initial appearance that he sings his song or speaks his piece, strengthens the resemblance. But this is a natural growth under the influence of two publics, the Greek and the Roman, notably fond of declamation and oratory. LeGrand believes this a characteristic directly derived from a narrative form of Middle Comedy embodied in certain extant fragments.139
The slave class is the topic of many of these monodies: either the virtues of the loyal slave are extolled140, or the knavery of the cunning slave141. The parasite is "featured" too, when Ergasilus bewails the decline of his profession142, or Peniculus and Gelasimus indulge in haunting threnody on their perpetual lack of food143. Bankers, lawyers and panders come in for their share of satire144. Our favorite topic today, the frills and furbelows of woman's dress and its reform, held the boards of ancient Athens and Rome145. InMil.637 ff, Periplecomenus descants on the joys of the old bon vivant and the expense of a wife. The delights or pains of love146, the ruminations of old age147, marriage reform148and divorce149, the views ofmeretricesand their victims on the arts of their profession150, the habits of cooks151, the pride of valor and heroic deeds152are fruitful subjects. InCur.462 ff. thechoragusinterpolates a recital composed of topical allusions to the manners of different neighborhoods of Rome. We have two descriptions of dreams153, and a clever bit which paints a likeness between a man and a house154. In foreign vein is the lament of Palaestra inRud.185 ff., which sounds like an echo from tragedy. The appearance of the Fishermen's Chorus (Rud.290 ff.) is wholly adventitious and seems designed to intensify the atmosphere of the seacoast, if indeed it has any purpose at all. In this category also belong the revels of the drunken Pseudolus with his song and dance155, and the final scene of theSt.156, where, the action of the slender plot over, the comedy slaves royster and dance with the harlot. When Ballio drives his herd before him, as he berates them merrily to the tune of a whip, we have an energetic and effective scene157.
3. Direct address of the audience.
It is a well-established principle that the most intimate cognizance of the spectator's existence is a characteristic of the lowest types of dramatic production (v. Part I, § 1, fin.). The use of soliloquy, aside and monologue all indicate the effort of the lines to put the player on terms of intimacy with his public. But even this is transcended by the frequent recurrence in jocular vein of deliberate, conscious and direct address of the audience, when they are called by name. InTruc.482 Stratophanes says: Ne expectetis, spectatores, meas pugnas dum praedicem.... InPoen Truc.597 we are told: Aurumst profecto hic, spectatores, sed comicum; i. e., "stage-money." During a halt in the action of thePs.(573) we are graciously informed: Tibicen vos interibi hic delectaverit. Mercury's comments (Amph.449-550 passim), probably with copious buffoonery, on the leave-taking of Jove and Alemena contain the remark (507): Observatote, quam blande mulieri palpabitur. At the close of theMen.(1157 ff.) Messenio announces an auction and invites the spectators to attend.
When Euclio discovers the loss of his hoard, he rushes forth in wild lament. In his extremity he turns to the audience (Aul.715 ff.):
"EUC. I beg, I beseech, I implore you, help me and show me the man that stole it. (Picking out one of the spectators, probably a tough looking "bruiser", and stretching out his hand to him.) What doyousay? I know I can trustyou. I can tell by your face you're honest. (To the whole audience, in response to the laughter sure to ensue.) What's the matter? What are you laughing at?" etc.
Moilère has imitated this scene very closely inL'Avare(IV. 7), with a super-Plautine profusion of verbiage.
InMil.200 ff. Periplecomenus obligingly acts as guide and personal conductor to the manoeuvers of Palaestrio's mind, while it is in the throes of evolving a stratagem. Palaestrio of course indulges in vivid, pointed pantomime:
"PER. I'll step aside here awhile. (To audience, pointing to Palaestrio.) Look yonder, please, how he stands with serried brow in anxious contemplation. His fingers smite his breast; I trow, he fain would summon forth his heart. Presto, change! His left hand he rests upon his left thigh. With the fingers of his right he reckons out his scheme. Ha! He whacks his right thigh!" etc.
It is very amusing too, when Jupiter inAmph.861 ff. strolls in and speaks his little piece to the pit:
"JUP. I am the renowned Amphitruo, whose slave is Sosia; you know, the fellow that turns into Mercury at will. I dwell in my sky-parlor and become Jupiter the while, ad libitum."158
Even in olden times Euanthius censured this practice (de Com.III.
6)159:
Naturally we shall hardly consider under this head the speech of the wholegrex, or the "Nunc plaudite" of an actor that closes a number of the plays. It is no more than the bowing or curtain-calls of today160, unless it was an emphatic announcement to the audience that the play was over.
We have referred above to the voluminous mass of inconsistencies, contradictions and psychological improbabilities collected by Langen in hisPlautinische Studien. He really succeeds in finding the crux of the situation in recognizing that these features are inherent in Plautus' style and are frequently employed solely for comic effect, though he is often overcome by a natural Teutonic stolidity. He aptly points out that Plautus in his selection of originals has in the main chosen plots with more vigorous action than Terence. We shall have occasion to quote him at intervals, but desire to develop this topic quite independently.
1. Pointless badinage and padded scenes.
Strong evidence of loose construction and lack of a technical dramatic ideal is contained in the large number of scenes padded out with pointless badinage, often tiresome, often wholly episodical in nature, as the monodies, and putting for a time a complete check on the plot. The most striking of these isAul.631 ff., when Euclio, suspecting Strobilus of the theft of his gold, pounces upon him and belabors him:
"STR. (Howling and dancing and making violent efforts to free himself.) What the plague has got hold of you? What have you to do with me, you dotard? Why pick on me? Why are you grabbing me? Don't beat me! (Succeeds in breaking loose.)
EUC. (Shaking stick at him.) You first-class jailbird, do you dare ask me again? You're not a thief, but three thieves rolled into one!
STR. (Whining and nursing bruises) What did I steal from you?
EUC. (Still threatening.) Give it back here, I say?
STR. (Trembling and edging off.) What is it you want me to give back?
EUC. (Watching him narrowly.) You ask?
STR. I tell you, I didn't take a thing from you.
EUC. (Impatiently.) All right, but hand over what you did take! (Pause.) Well, well!
STR. Well, what?
EUC. You can't get away with it.
STR. (Bolder.) Look here, what do you want?...
EUC. (Angrier and angrier.) Hand it over, I say! Stop quibbling! I'm not trifling now!
STR. Now what shall I hand over? Speak out! Why don't you give the thing a name? I swear I never touched or handled anything of yours.
EUC. Put out your hands.
STR. There you are! I've done so. See them?
EUC. (Scrutinizing his hands closely.) All right. Now put out the third too.
STR. (Aside, growing angry.) The foul fiends of madness have possessed this doddering idiot. (Majestically.) Confess you wrong me?
EUC. (Dancing in frenzy.) To the utmost, since I don't have you strung up! And that's what'll happen too, if you don't confess.
STR. (Shouting.) Confess what?
EUC. What did you steal from here? (Pointing to his house.)
STR. Strike me if I stole anything of yours, (Aside to audience) and if I don't wish I'd made off with it.
EUC. Come now, shake out your cloak.
STR. (Doing so.) As you please.
EUC. (Stooping to see if anything falls out.) Haven't got it under your shirt? (Pounces upon him and ransacks clothing.)
STR. (Resignedly.) Search me, if you like;" and so on with "Give it back," What is it? "Put out your right hand," etc., etc.
Molière again imitated almost slavishly (L'Avare, V. 3). Longwinded as the thing is, it is clear that the liveliness of the action not only relieves it, but could make it immensely amusing. At least it is superior to the average vaudeville skit of the present day. It must not be forgotten too that, as Plautus was in close touch with his players, he could have done much of the stage-directing himself and might even have worked up some parts to fit the peculiar talents of certain actors, as is regularly done in the modern "tailormade drama."
There are numbers of scenes of the sort quoted above, where the apparent monotony and verbal padding could be converted into coin for laughter by the clever comedian.Amph.551-632 could be worked up poco a poco crescendo e animato; inPoen.504 ff., Agorastocles and theAdvocatibandy extensive rhetoric; inTrin.276 ff., the action is suspended while Philto proves himself Polonius' ancestor in his long-winded sermonizing to Lysiteles and his insistentlaudatio temporis acti; inSt.326 ff., as Pinacium, theservus currens, finally succeeds in "arriving" out of breath (he has been running since 274), bursting with the vast importance of his news, he postpones the delivery of his tidings till 371 while he indulges in irrelevant badinage. This is pure buffoonery. And we can instance scene upon scene where the self-evident padding can either furnish an excuse for agile histrionism, or become merely tiresome in its iteration161. The danger of the latter was even recognized by our poet, when, at the end of much word-fencing, Acanthio asks Charinus if his desire to talk quietly is prompted by fear of waking "the sleeping spectators" (Mer.160). This was probably no exaggeration.
When the padding takes the form of mutual "spoofing," the scene assumes an uncanny likeness to the usual lines of a modern "high-class vaudeville duo." Note Leonida and Libanus, the merry slaves of theAs.in 297 ff., Toxilus and Sagaristio in thePer., Milphio and Syncerastus in thePoen.(esp. 851 ff.), Pseudolus and Simia inPs.905 ff., Trachalio and Gripus inRud.938 ff., Stichus and Sagarinus in the final scene of theSt., and inPs.1167 ff. Harpax is unmercifully "chaffed" by Simo and Ballio. Or, in view of the surrounding drama, we might better compare these roysterers to the "team" of low comedians often grafted on a musical comedy, where their antics effectually prevent the tenuous plot from becoming vulgarly prominent.
2. Inconsistencies of character and situation.
The Plautine character is never a consistent human character. He is rather a personified trait, a broad caricature on magnified foibles of some type of mankind. There is never any character development, no chastening. We leave our friends as we found them. They may exhibit the outward manifestation of grief, joy, love, anger, but their marionette nature cannot be affected thereby. That we should find inconsistencies in character portrayal under these circumstances, is not only to be expected, but is a mathematical certainty. The poet cares not; they must only dance, dance, dance!
Persistent moralizers, such as Megaronides in theTrin., who serve but as a foil from whom the revelry "sticks fiery off," descend themselves at moments to bandying the merriest quips (Scene I.). InEp.382 ff., the moralizing of Periphanes is counterfeit coinage. Gilded youths such as Calidorus of thePs.begin by asking (290 f.): "Could I by any chance trip up father, who is such a wide-awake old boy?", and end by rolling their eyes upward with: "And besides, if I could, filial piety prevents." The Menaechmi twins are eminently respectable, but they cheerfully purloin mantles, bracelets and purses. Hanno of thePoen.should according to specifications be a staidpater familias, but Plautus imputes to him a layer of thePunica fidesthat he knew his public would take delight in "booing." And the old gentleman enters into a plot (1090) to chaff elaborately his newly-found long-lost daughters, whom he has spent a lifetime in seeking, before disclosing his identity to them (1211 ff.). Saturio's daughter in thePer.is at one time the very model of maidenly modesty and wisdom (336 ff.), at others an accomplished intriguante and demi-mondaine (549 ff., esp. 607 ff.). When the plot of theEp.is getting hopelessly tangled, of a sudden it is magically resolved as by a deus ex machina and everybody decides to "shake and make up."
Slaves ever fearful of the mills or quarries are yet prone to the most abominable "freshness" towards their masters. The irrepressible Pseudolus in reading a letter from Calidorus' mistress says (27 ff.):
"What letters! Humph! I'm afraid the Sibyl is the only person capable of interpreting these.
"CAL. Oh why do you speak so rudely of those lovely letters written on a lovely tablet with a lovely hand?
"PS. Well, would you mind telling me if hens have hands? For these look to me very like hen-scratches.
"CAL. You insulting beast! Read, or return the tablet!
"PS. Oh, I'll read all right, all right. Just focus your mind on this.
"CAL.(Pointing vacantly to his head.) Mind? It's not here.
"PS. What! Go get one quick then!162."
In order that the machinations of these cunning slaves may mature, it is usually necessary to portray their victims as the veriest fools. Witness the cock-and-bull story by which Stasimus, inTrin.515 ff., convinces Philto that his master's land is an undesirable real estate prospect. Dordalus inPer.(esp. 493 ff.) exhibits a certain amount of caution in face of Toxilus' "confidence game," but that he should be victimized at all stamps him as a caricature.
LeGrand is certainly right in pronouncing the cunning slave a pure convention, adapted from the Greek and so unsuitable to Roman society that even Plautus found it necessary to apologize for their unrestrained gambols, on the ground that 'that was the way they did in Athens!'163
Certain of the characters are caricaturespar excellence, embodiments of a single attribute. Leaena of theCur.is the perpetually thirstylena: "Wine, wine, wine!"164Cleaerata of theAs.is a plain caricature, but is exceptionally cleverly drawn as thelenawith the mordant tongue. Phronesium's thirst in theTruc., is gold, gold, gold! Thedanistaof theMost.finds the whole expression of his nature in the cry of "Faenus!"165Assuredly, he is the progenitor of the modern low-comedy Jew: "I vant my inderesd!" Calidorus of thePs.and Phaedromus of theCur.are but bleeding hearts dressed up in clothes. Themilites gloriosiare all cartoons;166and the perpetually moralizing pedagogue Lydus of theBac.becomes funny, instead of egregiously tedious, if acted as a broad burlesque.
The panders167are all manifest caricatures, too, especially the famous Ballio of thePs., whom even Lorenz properly describes as "der Einbegriff aller Schlechtigkeit," though he deprecates the part as "eine etwas zu grell and zu breit angefuhrte Schilderung."168"Ego scelestus," says Ballio himself.169He calmly and unctuously pleads guilty to every charge of "liar, thief, perjurer," etc., and can never be induced to lend an ear until the cabalistic charm "Lucrum!" is pronounced (264).
The famous miser Euclio has given rise to an inordinate amount of
unnecessary comment. Lamarre170is at great pains to defend Plautus from
"le reproche d'avoir introduit dans la peinture de son principal
personnage
3. Looseness of dramatic construction.
Lorenz with commendable insight has pointed out173that Τύχη, the goddess of Chance, is the motive power of the Plautine plot, as distinguished from the μοῖρα of tragedy. A student of Plautus readily recognizes this point. The entire development of theRud.andPoen.exemplifies it in the highest degree. Hanno in thePoen., in particular, meets first of all, in the strange city of Calydon, the very man he is looking for! When Pseudolus is racking his wits for a stratagem, Harpax obligingly drops in with all the requisites. The ass-dealer in theAs.is so ridiculously fortuitous that it savors of childlike naiveté.
Characters are perpetually entering just when wanted. We hear "Optume advenis" and "Eccum ipsum video" so frequently that they become as meaningless as "How d'ye do!"174; though, as shown above175, even this very weakness could at moments be made the pretext for a mild laugh.
For a complete catalogue of the formidable mass of inconsistencies and contradictions that throng the plays, the reader is referred to thePlautinische Studienof Langen, as aforesaid. It will be of passing interest to recall one or two. InCas.530 Lysidamus goes to the "forum" and returns32 verses latercomplaining that he has wasted the whole day standing "advocate" for a kinsman. But this difficulty is resolved, if we accept the theory of Prof. Kent (TAPA. XXXVII), that the change of acts which occurs in between, is a conventional excuse for any lapse of time, in Roman comedy as well as in Greek tragedy. But it is extremely doubtful that Prof. Kent succeeds in establishing the truth of this view in the case of Roman comedy. We see no convincing reason for departing from the accepted theory, as expressed by Duff (A Literary History of Rome, pp. 196-7): "In Plautus' time a play proceeded continuously from the lowering of the curtain at the beginning to its rise at the end, save for short breaks filled generally by simple music from thetibicen(Ps.573). The division into scenes is ancient and regularly indicated in manuscripts of Plautus and Terence."
Langen seems surprised176when Menaechmus Sosicles, on beholding his twin for the first time (Men.1062), though he was the object of a six years' search, wades through some twenty lines of amazed argument before Messenio (with marvelous cunning!) hits on the true explanation. It is of course conceived in a burlesque spirit. What would become of the comic action if Menaechmus II simply walked up to Menaechmus I and remarked: "Hello, brother, don't you remember me?"