Ver. 23.Ver. 24.Ver. 25.
Now it was not written only on his account, that it was reckoned to him, but also on account of us, to whom it is sure(μέλλει)to be reckoned,in the fixed intention of the divine Justifier, as each successive applicant comes to receive;believing as we do on the Raiser-up of Jesus our Lord from the dead; who was delivered up on account of our transgressions, and was raised up on account of our justification.
Here the great argument moves to a pause, to the cadence of a glorious rest. More and more, as we have pursued it, it has disengaged itself from the obstructions of the opponent, and advanced with a larger motion into a positive and rejoicing assertion of the joys and wealth of the believing. We have left far behind the pertinacious cavils which ask, now whether there is any hope for man outside legalism, now whether within legalism there can be any danger even for deliberate unholiness, and again whether the Gospel of gratuitous acceptance does not cancel the law of duty. We have left the Pharisee for Abraham, and have stood beside him tolook and listen. He, in the simplicity of a soul which has seen itself and seen the Lord, and so has not one word, one thought, about personal privilege, claim, or even fitness, receives a perfect acceptance in the hand of faith, and finds that the acceptance carries with it a promise of unimaginable power and blessing. And now from Abraham the Apostle turns to "us," "us all," "us also." His thoughts are no longer upon adversaries and objections, but on the company of the faithful, on those who are one with Abraham, and with each other, in their happy willingness to come, without a dream of merit, and take from God His mighty peace in the name of Christ. He finds himself not in synagogue or in school, disputing, but in the believing assembly, teaching, unfolding in peace the wealth of grace. He speaks to congratulate, to adore.
Let us join him there in spirit, and sit down with Aquila and Priscilla, with Nereus, and Nymphas, and Persis, and in our turn remember that "it was written for us also." Quite surely, and with a fulness of blessing which we can never find out in its perfection, to us also "faith is sure to be reckoned,μέλλει λογίζεσθαι,as righteousness, believing as we do,τοῖς πιστεύουσιν,on the Raiser-up of Jesus our Lord, ours also,from the dead." To us, as to them, the Father presents Himself as the Raiser-up of the Son. He is known by us in that act. It gives us His own warrant for a boundless trust in His character, His purposes, His unreserved intention to accept the sinner who comes to His feet in the name of His Crucified and Risen Son. He bids us—not forget that He is the Judge, who cannot for a moment connive. But He bids us believe, He bids ussee, that He, being the Judge, and also the Law-Giver, has dealt with His own Law, in a way that satisfies it, that satisfiesHimself. He bids us thus understand that He now "is sure to" justify, to accept, to find not guilty, to find righteous, satisfactory, the sinner who believes. He comes to us, He, this eternal Father of our Lord, to assure us, in the Resurrection, that He has sought, and has "found, a Ransom"; that He has not been prevailed upon to have mercy, a mercy behind which there may therefore lurk a gloomy reserve, but has Himself "set forth" the beloved Propitiation, and then accepted Him (not it, but Him) with the acceptance of not His word only but His deed. He is the God of Peace. How do we know it? We thought He was the God of the tribunal, and the doom. Yes; but He has "brought the great Shepherd from the dead, in the blood of the everlasting Covenant" (Heb. xiii. 20). Then, O eternal Father of our Lord, we will believe Thee; we will believe in Thee; we will, we do, in the very letter of the words Thou didst bid Thy messenger write down here, "believe upon Thee,"ἐπὶ τὸν Ἐγείραντα, as in a deep repose. Truly, inthisglorious respect, though Thou art consuming Fire, "there is nothing in Thee to dread."
"Who was delivered up because of our transgressions." So dealt the Father with the Son, who gave Himself. "It pleased the Lord to bruise Him"; "He spared not His own Son." "Because of our transgressions"; to meet the fact that we had gone astray. What, was that fact thus to be met? Was our self-will, our pride, our falsehood, our impurity, our indifference to God, our resistance to God, to be thus met? Was it to be met at all, and not rather left utterly alone to its own horrible issues? Was it eternally necessary that, if met, it must be met thus, by nothing less than the delivering up of Jesus our Lord? It was even so.Assuredly if a milder expedient would have met our guilt, theFatherwould not have "delivered up" theSon. The Cross was nothing if not an absolutesine quâ non. There is that in sin, and in God, which made it eternally necessary that—if man was to be justified—the Son of God must not only live but die, and not only die but die thus, delivered up, given over to be done to death, as those who do great sin are done.
Deep in the heart of the divine doctrine of Atonement lies this element of it, the "because of our transgressions"; the exigency of Golgotha, due to our sins. The remission, the acquittal, the acceptance, was not a matter for the verbalfiatof divine autocracy. It was a matter not between God and creation, which to Him is "a little thing," but between God and His Law, that is to say, Himself, as He is eternal Judge. And this, to the Eternal, isnota little thing. So the solution called for no little thing, but for the Atoning Death, for the laying by the Father on the Son of the iniquities of us all, that we might open our arms and receive from the Father the merits of the Son.
"And was raised up because of our justification;" because our acceptance had been won, by His deliverance up. Such is the simplest explanation of the grammar, and of the import. The Lord's Resurrection appears as, so to speak, the mighty sequel, and also the demonstration, warrant, proclamation, of His acceptance as the Propitiation, and therefore of our acceptance in Him. For indeed itwasour justification, when He paid our penalty. True, the acceptance does not accrue to the individual till he believes, and so receives. The gift is not put into the hand till it is open, and empty. But the gift has been bought ready for therecipient long before he kneels to receive it. It was his, in provision, from the moment of the purchase; and the glorious Purchaser came up from the depths where He had gone down to buy, holding aloft in His sacred hands the golden Gift, ours because His for us.
A little while before he wrote to Rome, St Paul had written to Corinth, and the same truth was in his soul then, though it came out only passingly, while with infinite impressiveness. "If Christ is not risen, idle is your faith; you are yet in your sins" (1 Cor. xv. 17). That is to say, so the context irrefragably shews, you are yet in the guilt of your sins; you are still unjustified. "In your sins" cannot possibly there refer to the moral condition of the converts; for as a matter of fact, which no doctrine could negative, the Corinthianswere"changed men." "In your sins" refers therefore to guilt, to law, to acceptance. And it bids them look to the Atonement as the objectivesine quâ nonfor that, and to the Resurrection as the one possible, and the only necessary, warrant to faith that the Atonement had secured its end.
"Who was delivered up; who was raised up." When? About twenty-five years before Paul sat dictating this sentence in the house of Gaius. There were at that moment about three hundred known living people, at least (1 Cor. xv. 6), who had seen the Risen One with open eyes, and heard Him with conscious ears. From one point of view, all was eternal, spiritual, invisible. From another point of view our salvation was as concrete, as historical, as much a thing of place and date, as the battle of Actium, or the death of Socrates. And what was done, remains done.
"Can length of years on God Himself exact,And make that fiction which was once a fact?"
"Can length of years on God Himself exact,And make that fiction which was once a fact?"
"Can length of years on God Himself exact,
And make that fiction which was once a fact?"
[55]In Uganda, 1893.[56]We attempt thus to represent the perfects,κεκένωται, κατήργηται.[57]Readοὗ δὲnotοὗ γάρ.[58]It is impossible to convey in English the point of the wordἔθνηhere, with its faint reference to theGentiles(in the sense common in later Judaism), spiritually "naturalized" among Abraham's descendants.[59]Observe the characteristicallyfragmentaryquotation, which assumes the reader's knowledge of the context—the context of the stars. Compare Heb. vi. 14, which similarly quotes Gen. xxii. 16, 17.[60]Μὴ ἀσθενήσας:—we attempt to convey the thought, given by the aorist, that hethen and therewas "not weak."[61]We render this clause as literally as possible. It is as if he would have written "On the promise of Godhe relied," but changed the expression to one more ample and more forcible. "Hisunbelief":τῇ ἀπιστίᾳ. Not that Abrahamhadunbelief actually, but he had it potentially; hemight havedisbelieved. In that sense unbelief was "his."[62]Ἐνεδυναμώθη: the thought is of strength summonedat a crisis.
[55]In Uganda, 1893.
[56]We attempt thus to represent the perfects,κεκένωται, κατήργηται.
[57]Readοὗ δὲnotοὗ γάρ.
[58]It is impossible to convey in English the point of the wordἔθνηhere, with its faint reference to theGentiles(in the sense common in later Judaism), spiritually "naturalized" among Abraham's descendants.
[59]Observe the characteristicallyfragmentaryquotation, which assumes the reader's knowledge of the context—the context of the stars. Compare Heb. vi. 14, which similarly quotes Gen. xxii. 16, 17.
[60]Μὴ ἀσθενήσας:—we attempt to convey the thought, given by the aorist, that hethen and therewas "not weak."
[61]We render this clause as literally as possible. It is as if he would have written "On the promise of Godhe relied," but changed the expression to one more ample and more forcible. "Hisunbelief":τῇ ἀπιστίᾳ. Not that Abrahamhadunbelief actually, but he had it potentially; hemight havedisbelieved. In that sense unbelief was "his."
[62]Ἐνεδυναμώθη: the thought is of strength summonedat a crisis.
PEACE, LOVE, AND JOY FOR THE JUSTIFIED
Romansv. 1-11
WE reached a pause in the Apostle's thought with the close of the last paragraph. We may reverently imagine, as in spirit we listen to his dictation, that a pause comes also in his work; that he is silent, and Tertius puts down the pen, and they spend their hearts awhile on worshipping recollection and realization. The Lord delivered up; His people justified; the Lord risen again, alive for evermore—here was matter for love, joy, and wonder.
But the Letter must proceed, and the argument has its fullest and most wonderful developments yet to come. It has now already expounded the tremendousneedof justifying mercy, for every soul of man. It has shewn howfaith, always and only, is the way to appropriate that mercy—the way of God's will, and manifestly also in its own nature the way of deepest fitness. We have been allowed to see faith in illustrative action, in Abraham, who by faith, absolutely, without the least advantage of traditional privilege, received justification, with the vast concurrent blessings which it carried. Lastly we have heard St Paul dictate to Tertius, for the Romans and for us, those summarizing words (iv. 25) in which we now have God's own certificateof the triumphant efficacy of that Atoning Work, which sustains the Promise in order that the Promise may sustain us believing.
We are now to approach the glorious theme of the Life of the Justified. This is to be seen not only as a state whose basis is the reconciliation of the Law, and whose gate and walls are the covenant Promise. It is to appear as a state warmed with eternal Love; irradiated with the prospect of glory. In it the man, knit up with Christ his Head, his Bridegroom, his all, yields himself with joy to the God who has received him. In the living power of the heavenly Spirit, who perpetually delivers him from himself, he obeys, prays, works, and suffers, in a liberty which is only not yet that of heaven, and in which he is maintained to the end by Him who has planned his full personal salvation from eternity to eternity.
It has been the temptation of Christians sometimes to regard the truth and exposition of Justification as if there were a certain hardness and as it were dryness about it; as if it were a topic rather for the schools than for life. If excuses have ever been given for such a view, they must come from other quarters than the Epistle to the Romans. Christian teachers, of many periods, may have discussed Justification as coldly as if they were writing a law-book. Or again they may have examined it as if it were a truth terminating in itself, the Omega as well as the Alpha of salvation; and then it has been misrepresented, of course. For the Apostle certainly does not discuss it drily; he lays deep indeed the foundations of Law and Atonement, but he does it in the manner of a man who is not drawing the plan of a refuge, but calling his reader from the tempest into what is not only a refuge but a home.And again he does not discuss it in isolation. He spends his fullest, largest, and most loving expositions on its intense and vital connexion with concurrent truths. He is about now to take us, through a noble vestibule, into the sanctuary of the life of the accepted, the life of union, of surrender, of the Holy Ghost.
Ver. 1.Ver. 2.
Justified therefore on terms of faith,[63]we have peace[64]towards our(τὸν)God,we possess in regard of Him the "quietness and assurance" of acceptance,through our Lord Jesus Christ,thus delivered up, and raised up, for us;through whom we have actually(καὶ)found[65]our(τὴν)introduction,our free admission,by our(τῇ)faith, into this grace,this unearned acceptance for Another's sake,in which we stand,instead of falling ruined, sentenced, at the tribunal.And we exult,not with the sinful "boasting"[66]of the legalist,but in hope(literally, "on hope,"ἐπ' ἐλπίδι, asreposing onthe promised prospect)of the glory of our(τοῦ)God,the light of the heavenly vision and fruition of our Justifier, and the splendour of an eternal service of Him in that fruition.|Ver. 3.|Nor only so, but we exult too in our tribulations,with a better fortitude than the Stoic's artificial serenity,knowing that the tribulation works out, develops, patient persistency,[67]as it occasions proof after proof of the powerof God in our weakness, and thus generatesthe habitof reliance;and then(δὲ)the patient persistencydevelopsproof,brings out in experience, as a proved fact, that through Christ we are not what we were;and then the proofdevelopshope,solid and definite expectation of continuing grace and final glory, and, in particular, of the Lord's Return;and the hope does not shame,does not disappoint; it is a hope sure and steadfast, for it is the hope of those who now know that they are objects of eternal Love;because the love of our(τοῦ)God has been poured out in our hearts;His love to us has been as it were diffused through our consciousness, poured out in a glad experience as rain from the cloud, as floods from the rising spring,[68]through the Holy Spirit that was given to us.
Here first is mentioned explicitly, in the Apostle's argument, (we do not reckon ch. i. 4 as in the argument,) the blessed Spirit, the Lord the Holy Ghost. Hitherto the occasion for the mention has hardly arisen. The considerations have been mainly upon the personal guilt of the sinner, and the objective fact of the Atonement, and the exercise of faith, of trust in God, as a genuine personal act of man. With a definite purpose, we may reverently think, the discussion of faith has been kept thus far clear of the thought of anything lying behind faith, of any "grace"givingfaith. For whether or no faith is the gift of God, it is most certainly the act of man; none should assert this more decidedly thanthose who hold (as we do) that Eph. ii. 8[69]doesteach that where saving faith is, it is there because God has "given" it. But how does He "give" it? Not, surely, by implanting a new faculty, but by so opening the soul to God in Christ that the divine magnet effectually draws the man to a willing repose upon such a God. But the man does this, as an act, himself. He trusts God as genuinely, as personally, as much with his own faculty of trust, as he trusts a man whom he sees to be quite trustworthy and precisely fit to meet an imperative need. Thus it is often the work of the evangelist and the teacher to insist upon thedutyrather than thegraceof faith; to bid men rather thank God for faithwhen they have believedthan wait for the sense of an afflatus before believing. And is this not what St Paul does here? At this point of his argument,and not before, he reminds the believer that his possession of peace, of happiness, of hope, has been attained and realized not, ultimately, of himself but through the working of the Eternal Spirit. The insight into mercy, into a propitiation provided by divine love, and so into the holy secret of the divine love itself, has been given him by the Holy Ghost, who has taken of the things of Christ, and shewn them to him, and secretly handled his "heart" so that the fact of the love of God is a part of experience at last. The man has been told of his great need, and of the sure and open refuge, and has stepped through its peaceful gate in the act of trusting the message and the will of God. Now he is asked to look round, to look back, and bless the hand which, when he was outside in thenaked field of death, opened his eyes to see, and guided his will to choose.
What a retrospect it is! Let us trace it from the first words of this paragraph again. First, here is thesure factof our acceptance, and the reason of it, and the method. "Therefore"; let not that word be forgotten. Our Justification is no arbitrary matter, whose causelessness suggests an illusion, or a precarious peace. "Therefore"; it rests upon an antecedent, in the logical chain of divine facts. We have read that antecedent, ch. iv. 25; "Jesus our Lord was given up because of our transgressions, and was raised up because of our justification." We assented to that fact; we have accepted Him, only and altogether, in this work of His.Thereforewe are justified,δικαιωθέντες,[70]placed by an act of divine Love, working in the line of divine Law, among those whom the Judge accepts, that He may embrace them as Father. Then, in this possession of the "peace" of our acceptance, thusled in(προσαγωγή), through the gate of the promise, with the footstep of faith, we find inside our Refuge far more than merely safety. We look up from within the blessed walls, sprinkled with atoning blood, and we see above them the hope of glory, invisible outside. And we turn to our present life within them (for all our life is to be lived within that broad sanctuary now), and we find resources provided there for a present as well as a prospective joy. We address ourselves to the discipline of the place; for ithasits discipline; the refuge is home, but it is also school; and we find, when we begin to try it, that the discipline is full of joy. It brings out into a joyful consciousness the power we now have, in Himwho has accepted us, in Him who is our Acceptance, to suffer and to serve in love. Our life has become a life not of peace only but of the hope which animates peace, and makes it flow "as a river." From hour to hour we enjoy the never-disappointing hope of "grace for grace," new grace for the next new need; and beyond it, and above it, the certainties of the hope of glory. To drop our metaphor of the sanctuary for that of the pilgrimage, we find ourselves upon a pathway, steep and rocky, but always mounting into purer air, and so as to shew us nobler prospects; and at the summit—the pathway will be continued, and transfigured, into the golden street of the City; the same track, but within the gate of heaven.
Into all this the Holy Ghost has led us. He has been at the heart of the whole internal process. He made the thunder of the Law articulate to our conscience. He gave us faith by manifesting Christ. And, in Christ, He has "poured out in our hearts the love of God."
For now the Apostle takes up that word, "the Love of God," and holds it to our sight, and we see in its pure glory no vague abstraction, but the face, and the work, of Jesus Christ. Such is the context into which we now advance. He is reasoning on; "ForChrist, when we still were weak." He has set justification before us in its majestic lawfulness. But he has now to expand its mighty love, of which the Holy Ghost has made us conscious in our hearts. We are to see in the Atonement not only a guarantee that we have a valid title to a just acceptance. We are to see in it the love of the Father and the Son, so that not our security only but our bliss may be full.
Ver. 6.
For Christ, we still being weak,(gentle euphemism for our utter impotence, our guilty inability to meet the sinless claim of the Law of God,)in season,in the fulness of time, when the ages of precept and of failure had done their work, and man had learnt something to purpose of the lesson of self-despair,for the ungodly—died."For the ungodly,"ὑπὲρ ἀσεβῶν, "concerning them," "with reference to them," that is to say, in this context of saving mercy, "in their interests, for their rescue,[71]as their propitiation." "The ungodly," or, more literally still, without the article, "ungodly ones"; a designation general and inclusive for those for whom He died. Above (iv. 5) we saw the word used with a certain limitation, as of the worst among the sinful. But here, surely, with a solemn paradox, it covers the whole field of the Fall. The ungodly here are not the flagrant and disreputable only; they are all who are not in harmony with God; the potential as well as the actual doers of grievous sin. For them "Christ died"; not "lived," let us remember, but "died." It was a question not of example, nor of suasion, nor even of utterances of divine compassion. It was a question of law and guilt; and it was to be met only by the death-sentence and the death-fact; such death asHedied of whom, a little while before, this same Correspondent had written to the converts ofGalatia (iii. 13); "Christ bought us out from the curse of the Law, when He became a curse for us." All the untold emphasis of the sentence, and of the thought, lies here upon those last words, upon each and all of them, "for ungodly ones—He died,"ὑπὲρ ἀσεβῶν—ἀπέθανε. The sequel shews this to us; he proceeds:|Ver. 7.Ver. 8.|For scarcely,with difficulty, and in rare instances,for a just man will one die;"scarcely," he will not say "never,"for for the good man,the man answering in some measure the ideal of gracious and not only of legal goodness,[72]perhaps someone actually ventures to die. But God commends,as by a glorious contrast (συνίστησι),His love,"His" as above all current human love, "His own love,"τὴν Ἑαυτοῦ,towards us, because while we were still sinners,and as such repulsive to the Holy One,Christ for us did die.
We are not to read this passage as if it were a statistical assertion as to the facts of human love and its possible sacrifices. The moral argument will not be affected if we are able, as we shall be, to adduce cases where unregenerate man has given even his life to save the life of one, or of many, to whom he is not emotionally or naturally attracted. All that is necessary to St Paul's tender plea for the love of God is the certain fact that the cases of death even on behalf of one whomorally deservesa great sacrifice are relatively very, very few. The thought of merit is the ruling thought in the connexion. He labours to bring out the sovereign Lovingkindness, which went even to the length and depth of death, by reminding us that, whatevermoved it, it was not moved, even in the lowest imaginable degree, by any merit, no, nor by any "congruity," in us. And yet we were sought, and saved. He who planned the salvation, and provided it, was the eternal Lawgiver and Judge. He who loved us is Himself eternal Right, to whom all our wrong is unutterably repellent. What then is He as Love, who, being also Right, stays not till He has given His Son to the death of the Atonement?
So we have indeed a warrant to "believe the love of God" (1 John iv. 16). Yes, to believe it. We look within us, and it is incredible. If we have really seen ourselves, we have seen ground for a sorrowful conviction that He who is eternal Right must view us with aversion. But if we have really seen Christ, we have seen ground for—not feeling at all, it may be, at this moment, but—believing that God is Love, and loves us. What is it to believe Him? It is to take Him at His word; to act altogether not upon our internal consciousness but upon His warrant. We look at the Cross, or rather, we look at the crucified Lord Jesus in His Resurrection; we read at His feet these words of His Apostle; and we go away to take God at His assurance that we, unlovely, are beloved.
"My child," said a dying French saint, as she gave a last embrace to her daughter, "I have loved you because of what you are; my heavenly Father, to whom I go, has loved memalgré moi."
Ver. 9.Ver. 10.Ver. 11.
And how does the divine reasoning now advance? "From glory to glory"; from acceptance by the Holy One, who is Love, to present and endless preservation in His Beloved One.Therefore much more, justified now in His blood,as it were "in" its laver of ablution, or again "within" its circle ofsprinkling as it marks the precincts of our inviolable sanctuary,we shall be kept safe through Him,who now lives to administer the blessings of His death,from the wrath,the wrath of God, in its present imminence over the head of the unreconciled, and in its final fall "in that day."For if, being enemies,with no initial love to Him who is Love, nay, when we were hostile to His claims, and as such subject to the hostility of His Law,we were reconciled to our(τῷ)God[73]through the death of His Son,(God coming to judicial peace with us, and we brought to submissive peace with Him,)much more, being reconciled, we shall be kept safe in His life,in the life of the Risen One who now lives for us, and in us, and we in Him.Nor only so, butwe shall be keptexulting too in our(τοῦ)God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom now we have received[74]this(τὴν)reconciliation.
Here, by anticipation, he indicates already the mighty issues of the act of Justification, in our life of Union with the Lord who died for us, and lived again. In the sixth chapter this will be more fully unfolded; but he cannot altogether reserve it so long. As he has advanced from the law-aspect of our acceptance to its love-aspect, so now with this latter he gives us at once the life-aspect, our vital incorporation with our Redeemer, our part and lot in His resurrection-life. Nowhere in this whole Epistle is that subject expounded so fully as in the later Epistles, Colossians and Ephesians; the Inspirer led His servant all over that region then, in his Roman prison, but not now. But He had brought him into the region from the first, and we see it herepresent to his thought, though not in the foreground of his discourse. "Kept safe in His life"; not "by" His life, but "in" His life. We are livingly knit to Him the Living One. From one point of view we are accused men, at the bar, wonderfully transformed, by the Judge's provision, into welcomed and honoured friends of the Law and the Lawgiver. From another point of view we are dead men, in the grave, wonderfully vivified, and put into a spiritual connexion with the mighty life of our Lifegiving Redeemer. The aspects are perfectly distinct. They belong to different orders of thought. Yet they are in the closest and most genuine relation. The Justifying Sacrifice procures the possibility of our regeneration into the Life of Christ. Our union by faith with the Lord who died and lives brings us into actual part and lot in His justifying merits. And our part and lot in those merits, our "acceptance in the Beloved," assures us again of the permanence of the mighty Love which will maintain us in our part and lot "in His life." This is the view of the matter which is before us here.
Thus the Apostle meets our need on every side. He shews us the holy Law satisfied for us. He shews us the eternal Love liberated upon us. He shews us the Lord's own Life clasped around us, imparted to us; "our life is hid in God with Christ, who is our Life" (Col. iii. 3, 4). Shall we not "exult in God through Him"?
And now we are to learn something of that great Covenant-Headship, in which we and He are one.
Εἰρήνην ἔχομεν, "We have peace":Εἰρήνην ἔχωμεν, "Let us have peace." Which did St Paul write? On the whole, after long thought upon the evidence, we decide for the former reading. The documentary witness is strong for the latter. For those who place the great Uncial manuscripts in the place of practical decision,ἔχωμενhas a clear verdict in its favour. But the other class of copies, the Cursive, later on the whole than the Uncials, but probably often representing correction rather than corruption, are greatly in favour ofἔχομεν. The evidence of ancient Versions, and of quotations by early Christian writers, inclines on the whole forἔχωμεν. But in the study of a reading the argument and context of course claim attention; for most surely the original reading, whatever it was, waspertinent. Now here the question ofpertinenceseems to us to lead to a decided verdict forἔχομεν. The Apostle is engaged here altogether with assertion, instruction; exhortation is to come later. Through this whole paragraph he does nothing but assert facts and principles. Is it to be believed that he begins it with adisjointedexhortation?
Initselfthe exhortation would bear a meaning perfectly intelligible. "Let us have peace" would mean "Let us enjoy peace." Soἔχωμεν χάριν, Heb. xii. 28, means, practically, "Let us use grace." Neither exhortation would mean that wedo not yet possess, in respect of the Lord's gift, "peace" and "grace" respectively.But, we repeat it, the context here seems decisive against the presencehereof any exhortation. We want, logically, assertion.
The interchange ofωandοin manuscripts is, as a fact, frequent.
See the case carefully considered, and decided forἔχομεν, in Dr Scrivener'sIntroduction to the Criticism of the N. T., p. 625.
Καταλλάσσειν, Καταλλαγή. It is sometimes held that these words denote "reconciliation" in the sense of man's laying aside his distrust, reluctance, resistance towards God, not of God's laying aside His holy displeasure against man; and that for this latter idea, that of persuading an offended superior to grant peace, we should need the wordsδιαλλάσσεσθαι(which we have Matt. v. 24, and in the Lxx. ine.g.1 Sam. xxix. 4, where the English has, "Wherewith should he reconcile himself to his master?") andδιαλλαγὴ(which does not occur in the N. T.). Butκαταλλαγὴ(and its verb) is as a fact used in the Greek of the Apocrypha in connexions where the thought is just that of the clemency of a king, induced to pardon. Seee.g.2 Macc. v. 20, where the English Version reads, "the great Lordbeing reconciled(ἐν τῇ καταλλαγῇ τοῦ μεγάλου Δεσπότου) [the temple] was set up." So 2 Macc. i. 5, where we have the prayer (English Version), "God beat onewith you,"καταλλαγείη ὑμῖν. Thus no elaborate distinction can safely be drawn between the two sets of compounds. And there is no place in the N. T. where the meaning,conciliation of an offended party, would not well suitκαταλλάσσεσθαι, etc. The present passage(Rom. v. 10, 11) would be practically meaningless otherwise. The whole thought is of the divine mercy, providing a way for accepting grace. To "receiveτὴν καταλλαγὴν" is a phrase which, by its very form as well as its connexion, points to the thought not of reluctance overcome but mercy found.
The word "atonement" (A.V., ver. 11) needs remark. It seems certain that its derivation is "at-one-ment" (See Skeat,Etymol. Dict., s.v.), though an etymological connexion withver-söhnen, (Dutch,ver-zoenen) has been maintained (see Hofmeyr,The Blessed Life, p. 25). But as Trench remarks, (Synonyms of the N. T., s.v.καταλλαγὴ,) the usage of English has now long attached the idea ofpropitiation(ἱλασμὸς) to the word "atonement"; which should therefore be avoided as a rendering forκαταλλαγή.
[63]Ἐκ πίστως: "out of faith." The phrase has often met us in the Greek before. It calls for various renderings in various contexts; that given above seems best to paraphrase it here.[64]See detached note, p. 140, for an account of the various reading here,ἔχωμεν εἰρήνην, "Let ushave peace."[65]Ἐσχήκαμεν: "we have had," "we have got."[66]Καυχᾶσθαι, καύχησις: see above ii. 23, iii. 27, iv. 2.[67]Ὑπομονὴis more than "patience." By usage it implies "patiencein action"; "perseverance."[68]It is quite possible, of course, to explainἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ, grammatically, to mean "our love to God." And some, more mystically, explain it of God's faculty of love conveyed to us that we, with it, may love Him. But the following context, especially ver. 8, is clearly against such expositions. Verses 6-11 are in fact an explanation of the thought of ver. 5.[69]The writer ventures to refer to his Commentary on Ephesians inThe Cambridge Bible.[70]Observe the aorist form of the participle.[71]Ὑπὲρis literally "over," and in itself imports simply "concern with"; as when we say that a man is busy "over" an important matter; as it were stooping over it, attending to it. Its special references depend altogether upon context and usage.In itselfit neither teaches nor denies the doctrine of a vicarious and substitutionary work;ἀητὶis the preposition which guarantees as true that great aspect of the Lord's death. Butὑπὲρof course amply allows for such anapplicationof its meaning, where the context suggests the idea.[72]We incline more than formerly, though still with some doubt, to see a rising climax here, as indicated in the paraphrase, fromδίκαιοςtoὁ ἀγαθός.[73]On the meaning ofκαταλλαγήsee detached note, p. 141.[74]Ἐλάβομεν: but the English perfect best represents the idea.
[63]Ἐκ πίστως: "out of faith." The phrase has often met us in the Greek before. It calls for various renderings in various contexts; that given above seems best to paraphrase it here.
[64]See detached note, p. 140, for an account of the various reading here,ἔχωμεν εἰρήνην, "Let ushave peace."
[65]Ἐσχήκαμεν: "we have had," "we have got."
[66]Καυχᾶσθαι, καύχησις: see above ii. 23, iii. 27, iv. 2.
[67]Ὑπομονὴis more than "patience." By usage it implies "patiencein action"; "perseverance."
[68]It is quite possible, of course, to explainἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ, grammatically, to mean "our love to God." And some, more mystically, explain it of God's faculty of love conveyed to us that we, with it, may love Him. But the following context, especially ver. 8, is clearly against such expositions. Verses 6-11 are in fact an explanation of the thought of ver. 5.
[69]The writer ventures to refer to his Commentary on Ephesians inThe Cambridge Bible.
[70]Observe the aorist form of the participle.
[71]Ὑπὲρis literally "over," and in itself imports simply "concern with"; as when we say that a man is busy "over" an important matter; as it were stooping over it, attending to it. Its special references depend altogether upon context and usage.In itselfit neither teaches nor denies the doctrine of a vicarious and substitutionary work;ἀητὶis the preposition which guarantees as true that great aspect of the Lord's death. Butὑπὲρof course amply allows for such anapplicationof its meaning, where the context suggests the idea.
[72]We incline more than formerly, though still with some doubt, to see a rising climax here, as indicated in the paraphrase, fromδίκαιοςtoὁ ἀγαθός.
[73]On the meaning ofκαταλλαγήsee detached note, p. 141.
[74]Ἐλάβομεν: but the English perfect best represents the idea.
CHRIST AND ADAM
Romansv. 12-21
WE approach a paragraph of the Epistle pregnant with mystery. It leads us back to Primal Man, to the Adam of the first brief pages of the Scripture record, to his encounter with the suggestion to follow himself rather than his Maker, to his sin, and then to the results of that sin in his race. We shall find those results given in terms which certainly we should not have deviseda priori. We shall find the Apostle teaching, or rather stating, for he writes as to those who know, that mankind inherits from primal Man, tried and fallen, not only taint but guilt, not only moral hurt but legal fault.
This is "a thing heard in the darkness." It has been said that Holy Scripture "is not a sun, but a lamp." The words may be grievously misused, by undue emphasis on the negative clause; but they convey a sure truth, used aright. Nowhere does the divine Book undertake to tell us all about everything it contains. It undertakes to tell us truth, and to tell it from God. It undertakes to give us pure light, yea, "to bring life and immortality out into the light," (2 Tim. i. 10). But it reminds us that we know "in part," and that even prophecy, even the inspiredmessage, is "in part" (1 Cor. xiii. 9). It illuminates immensely much, but it leaves yet more to be seen hereafter. It does not yet kindle the whole firmament and the whole landscape like an oriental sun. It sheds its glory upon our Guide, and upon our path.
A passage like this calls for such recollections. It tells us, with the voice of the Apostle's Lord, great facts about our own race, and its relations to its primeval Head, such that every individual man has a profound moral and also judicialnexuswith the first Man. It does not tell us how those inscrutable but solid facts fit into the whole plan of God's creative wisdom and moral government. The lamp shinesthere, upon the edges of a deep ravine beside the road; it does not shine sunlike over the whole mountain-land.
As with other mysteries which will meet us later, so with this; we approach it as those who "know in part," and who know that the apostolic Prophet, by no defect of inspiration, but by the limits of the case, "prophesies in part." Thus with awful reverence, with godly fear, and free from the wish to explain away, yet without anxiety lest God should be proved unrighteous, we listen as Paul dictates, and receive his witness about our fall and our guilt in that mysterious "First Father."
We remember also another fact of this case. This paragraph deals only incidentally with Adam; its main theme is Christ. Adam is the illustration; Christ is the subject. We are to be shewn in Adam, by contrast, some of "the unsearchable riches of Christ." So that our main attention is called not to the brief outline of the mystery of the Fall, but to the assertions of the related splendour of the Redemption.
St Paul is drawing again to a close, a cadence. Heis about to conclude his exposition of the Way of Acceptance, and to pass to its junction with the Way of Holiness. And he shews us here last, in the matter of Justification, this fragment from "the bottoms of the mountains"—the union of the justified with their redeeming Lord as race with Head; thenexusin that respect between them and Him which makes His "righteous act" of such infinite value to them. In the previous paragraph, as we have seen, he has gravitated toward the deeper regions of the blessed subject; he has indicated our connexion with the Lord's Life as well as with His Merit. Now, recurring to the thought of the Merit, he still tends to the depths of truth, and Christ our Righteousness is lifted before our eyes from those pure depths as not the Propitiation only, but the Propitiation who is also our Covenant-Head, our Second Adam, holding His mighty merits for a new race, bound up with Himself in the bond of a real unity.
He "prophesies in part," meanwhile, even in respect of this element of his message. As we saw just above, the fullest explanations of our union with the Lord Christin His lifewere reserved by St Paul's Master for other Letters than this. In the present passage we have not, what probably we should have had if the Epistle had been written five years later, a definite statement of the connexion between our Union with Christ in His covenant and our Union with Him in His life; a connexion deep, necessary, significant. It is not quite absent from this passage, if we read verses 17, 18, aright; but it is not prominent. The main thought is of merit, righteousness, acceptance; of covenant, of law. As we have said, this paragraph is the climax of the Epistle to the Romans as to its doctrine of our peace with God through the merits of His Son. It isenough for the purpose of that subject that it should indicate, and only indicate, the doctrine that His Son is also our Life, our indwelling Cause and Spring of purity and power.
Recollecting thus the scope and the connexion of the passage, let us listen to its wording.