Historic Period.—In tracing back the history of the organic world we find, even within the limits of the historical period, that some animals have become extinct, while the distribution of others has been materially changed. TheRytinaof the North Pacific, the dodo of Mauritius, and the great auk of the North Atlantic coasts, have been exterminated almost in our own times. The kitchen-middens of Denmark contain remains of the capercailzie, theBos primigenius, and the beaver. The first still abounds farther north, the second is extinct, and the third is becoming so in Europe. The great Irish elk, a huge-antlered deer, probably existed almost down to historic times.
Pleistocene or Post-Pliocene Period.—We first meet with proofs of important changes in the character of the European fauna, in studying the remains found in the caverns of England and France, which have recently been so well explored. These cave-remains are probably all subsequent to the Glacial epoch, and they all come within the period of man's occupation of the country. Yet we find clear proofs of two distinct kinds of change in the forms of animal life. First we have a change clearly traceable to a difference of climate. We find such arctic forms as the rein-deer, the musk-sheep, the glutton, and the lemming, with the mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros of the Siberian ice-cliffs, inhabiting this country and even the south of France. This is held to be good proof that a sub-arctic climate prevailed over all Central Europe; and this climate, together with the continental condition of Britain, will sufficiently explain such a southward range of what are now arctic forms.
But together with this change we have another that seems at first sight to be in an exactly opposite direction. We meet with numerous animals which now only inhabit Africa, or South Europe, or the warmer parts of Asia. Such are, large felines—some closely related to the lion (Felis spelæa), others of altogether extinct type (Machairodus) and forming the extreme development of the feline race;—hyænas; horses of two or more species; and a hippopotamus. If we go a little further back, to the remains furnished by the gravels and brick-earths, we still find the same association of forms. The reindeer, the glutton,the musk-sheep, and the woolly rhinoceros, are associated with several other species of rhinoceros and elephant; with numerous civets, now abundant only in warm countries; and with antelopes of several species. We also meet here with a great extension of range of forms now limited to small areas. The Saiga antelope of Eastern Europe occurs in France, where wild sheep and goats and the chamois were then found, together with several species of deer, of bear, and of hyæna. A few extinct genera even come down to this late period, such as the great sabre-toothed tiger,Machairodus;Galeotherium, a form of Viverridæ;Palæospalax, allied to the mole; andTrogontherium, a gigantic form of beaver,
We find then, that even at so early a stage of our inquiries we meet with a problem in distribution by no means easy to solve. How are we to explain the banishment from Europe in so short a space of time (geologically speaking) of so many forms of life now characteristic of warmer countries, and this too during a period when the climate of Central Europe was itself becoming warmer? Such a change must almost certainly have been due to changes of physical geography, which we shall be better able to understand when we have examined the preceding Pliocene period. We may here notice, however, that so far as we yet know, this great recent change in the character of the fauna is confined to the western part of the Palæarctic region. In caves in the Altai Mountains examined by Prof. Brandt, a great collection of fossil bones was discovered. These comprised the Siberian rhinoceros and mammoth, and the cave hyæna; but all the others, more than thirty distinct species, are now living in or near the same regions. We may perhaps impute this difference to the fact that the migration of Southern types into this part of Siberia was prevented by the great mountain and desert barrier of the Central Asiatic plateau; whereas in Europe there was at this time a land connection with Africa. Post-pliocene deposits and caverns in Algeria have yielded remains resembling the more southern European types of the Post-pliocene period, but without any admixture of Arctic forms; showing, as we might expect, that the glacial cold did notextend so far south. We have here remains ofEquus,Bos,Antilope,Hippopotamus,Elephas,Rhinoceros,Ursus,Canis, andHyæna, together withPhacochœrus, an African type of swine which has not occurred in the European deposits.
It is perhaps to the earlier portion of this period that theMerycotheriumof the Siberian drift belongs. This was an animal related to the living camel, thus supporting the view that theCamelidæare essentially denizens of the extra-tropical zone.
Pliocene Period.
Primates.—We here first meet with evidence of the existence of monkeys in Central Europe. Species ofMacacushave left remains not only in the Newer Pliocene of the Val d'Arno in Italy, but in beds of the same age at Grays in Essex; whileSemnopithecusandCercopithecus, genera now confined to the Oriental and Ethiopian regions respectively, have been found in the Pliocene deposits of the South of France and Italy.
Carnivora.—Most of the genera which occurred in the Post-Pliocene are found here also, and many of the same species. Few new forms appear, exceptHyænarctos, a large bear with characters approaching the hyænas, andPristiphoca, a new form of seal, both from the Older Pliocene of France; andGalecynus, a fox-like animal intermediate betweenCanisandViverra, from the Pliocene of Œninghen in Switzerland.
Cetacea.—Species ofBalæna,Physeter, andDelphinusoccur in the Older Pliocene of England and France, and with these the remains of many extinct forms,BalænodonandHoplocetus(Balænidæ);BelemnoziphiusandChoneziphius(Hyperoodontidæ), andHalitherium, an extinct form of the next order—Sirenia, now confined to the tropics, although the recently extinctRytinaof the N. W. Pacific shows that it is also adapted for temperate climates.
Ungulata.—The Pliocene deposits are not very rich in this order. The horses (Equidæ) are represented by the genusEquus; and here we first meet withHipparion, in which small lateral toes appear. Both genera occur in British deposits of this age.A more interesting fact for us is the occurrence of the genusTapirusin the Newer Pliocene of France and in the older beds of both France and England, since this genus is now isolated in the remotest parts of the eastern and western tropics. The generaRhinoceros,Hippopotamus, andSus, occur here as in the preceding epoch.
We next come to the deer genus (Cervus), which appears to have been at its maximum in this period, no less than eight species occurring in the Norwich Crag, and Forest-beds. Among the Bovidæ, the antelopes, ox, and bison, are the only forms represented here, as in the Post-Pliocene period. Passing on to the Proboscidea, we find three species of elephants and two ofMastodonpreserved in European beds of this period, all distinct from those of Post-Pliocene times.
Rodentia.—In this order we find representatives of many living European forms; asCricetus(hamster),Arvicola(vole),Castor(beaver),Arctomys(marmot),Hystrix(porcupine),Lepus(hare), andLagomys(pika); and a few that are extinct, the most important beingChalicomys, allied to the beaver; andIssiodromys, said to come nearest to the remarkablePedetesof South Africa, both found in the Pliocene formations of France.
General Conclusions as to Pliocene and Post-Pliocene Faunas of Europe.—This completes the series of fossil forms of the Pliocene deposits of Europe. They show us that the presence of numerous large carnivora and ungulates (now almost wholly tropical) in the Post-Pliocene period, was due to no exceptional or temporary cause, but was the result of a natural succession from similar races which had inhabited the same countries for long preceding ages. In order to understand the vast periods of time covered by the Pliocene and Post-Pliocene formations, the works of Sir Charles Lyell must be studied. We shall then come to see, that the present condition of the fauna of Europe is wholly new and exceptional. For a long succession of ages, various forms of monkeys, hyænas, lions, horses, hipparions, tapirs, rhinoceroses, hippopotami, elephants, mastodons, deer, and antelopes, togetherwith almost all the forms now living, produced a rich and varied fauna such as we now see only in the open country of tropical Africa. During all this period we have no reason to believe that the climate or other physical conditions of Europe were more favourable to the existence of these animals than now. We must look upon them, therefore, as true indigenes of the country, and their comparatively recent extinction or banishment as a remarkable phenomenon for which there must have been some adequate cause. What this cause was we can only conjecture; but it seems most probable that it was due to the combined action of the Glacial period, and the subsidence of large areas of land once connecting Europe with Africa. The existence, in the small island of Malta, of no less than three extinct species of elephant (two of very small stature), of a gigantic dormouse, an extinct hippopotamus, and other mammalia, together with the occurrence of remains of hippopotamus in the caves of Gibraltar, indicate very clearly that during the Pliocene epoch, and perhaps during a considerable part of the Post-Pliocene, a connection existed between South Europe and North Africa in at least these two localities. At the same time we have every reason to believe that Britain was united to the Continent, what is now the German Ocean constituting a great river-valley. During the height of the Glacial epoch, these large animals would probably retire into this Mediterranean land and into North Africa, making annual migrations northwards during the summer. But as the connecting land sank and became narrower and narrower, the migrating herds would diminish, and at last cease altogether; and when the glacial cold had passed away would be altogether prevented from returning to their former haunts.
Miocene Period.
We now come to a period which was wonderfully rich in all forms of life, and of which the geological record is exceptionally complete. Various lacustrine, estuarine, and other deposits in Europe, North India, and North America, have furnished such avast number of remains of extinct mammalia, as to solve many zoological problems, and to throw great light on the early distribution and centres of dispersal of various groups of animals. In order to show the bearing of these remains on our special subject, we will first give an account of the extinct fauna of Greece, of the Upper Miocene period; since this, being nearest to Africa and Asia, best exhibits the relations of the old European fauna to those countries. We shall then pass to the Miocene fauna of France and Central Europe; and conclude with the remarkable Siwalik and other Indian extinct faunas, which throw an additional light on the early history of the animal life of the great old-world continents.
Extinct Animals of Greece.
These are from the Upper Miocene deposits at Pikermi, near Athens, and were collected by M. Gaudry a few years ago. They comprise ten living and eighteen extinct genera of mammalia, with a few birds and reptiles.
Primates.—These are represented byMesopithecus, a genus believed to be intermediate between the two Indian genera of monkeys,SemnopithecusandMacacus.
Carnivora.—These were abundant. OfFelisthere were four species, ranging from the size of a cat to that of a jaguar, a largehyæna, and a large weasel (Mustela). Besides these there were the hugeMachairodus, larger than any existing lion or tiger, and with enormously developed canine teeth;HyænictisandLycæna, extinct forms of Hyænidæ;Thalassictis=Ictitherium, an extinct genus of Viverridæ but with resemblances to the hyænas, represented by three species, some of which were larger than any existing Viverridæ;Promephytis, an extinct form of Mustelidæ, having resemblances to the European marten, to the otters, and to the S. AfricanZorilla; and lastly,Simocyon, an extraordinary carnivore of the size of a small panther, but having the canines of a cat, the molars of a dog, and the jaws shaped like those of a bear.
Ungulata.—These are numerous and veryinteresting. The Equidæ are represented by the three-toedHipparion, whichcontinued to exist till the Older Pliocene period. There are three large species ofRhinoceros, as well as a species of the extinct genusLeptodonof smaller size. Remains of a very large wild boar (Sus) were found. Very interesting is the occurrence of a species of giraffe (Camelopardalis) as tall as the African species but more slender; and also an extinct genusHelladotherium, not quite so tall as the giraffe but much more robust, and showing some approach to the Antilopidæ in its dentition. Antelopes were abundant, ranging from the size of the gazelle to that of the largest living species. Three or four seem referable to living genera, but the majority are of extinct types, and are classed in the generaPalæotragus,Palæoryx,Tragocerus, andPalæoreas; whileDremotheriumis an ancient generalized form ofCervidæor deer.
Proboscidea.—These are represented by two species ofMastodon, and two ofDinotherium, an extraordinary extinct form supposed to be, to some extent, intermediate between the elephants and the aquatic manatees (Sirenia.)
Rodentia.—This order is represented by a species ofHystrix, larger than living porcupines.
Edentata.—This order, now almost confined to South America, was represented in the Miocene period by several European species.AncylotheriumandMacrotherium, belonging to an extinct family but remotely allied to the African ant-bear (Orycteropus), occur in Greece.
Birds.—Species ofPhasianusandGalluswere found; the latter especially interesting as being now confined to India.
Reptiles.—These are few and unimportant, consisting of a tortoise (Testudo) and a large lizard allied toVaranus.
Summary of the Miocene Fauna of Greece.—Although we cannot consider that the preceding enumeration gives us by any means a complete view of the actual inhabitants of this part of Europe during the later portion of the Miocene period, we yet obtain some important information. The resemblance that appeared in the Pliocene fauna of Europe, to that of the open country of tropical Africa, is now still more remarkable. Wenot only find great felines, surpassing in size and destructive power the lions and leopards of Africa, with hyænas of a size and in a variety not to be equalled now, but also huge rhinoceroses and elephants, two forms of giraffes, and a host of antelopes, which, from the sample here obtained, were probably quite as numerous and varied as they now are in Africa. Joined with this abundance of antelopes we have the absence of deer, which probably indicates that the country was open and somewhat of a desert character, since there were deer in other parts of Europe at this epoch. The occurrence of but a single species of monkey is also favourable to this view, since a well-wooded country would most likely have supplied many forms of these animals.
Miocene Fauna of Central and Western Europe.
We have now to consider the Miocene fauna of Europe generally, of which we have very full information from numerous deposits of this age in France, Switzerland, Italy, Germany, and Hungary.
Primates.—Three distinct forms of monkeys have been found in Europe—in the South of France, in Switzerland, and Wurtemberg; one was very likeColobusorSemnopithecus; the others—PliopithecusandDryopithecus—were of higher type, and belonged to the anthropomorphous apes, being nearest to the genusHylobatesor gibbons. Both have occurred in the South of France. TheDryopithecuswas a very large animal (equal to the gorilla), and M. Lartet considers that in the character of its dentition it approached nearer to man than any of the existing anthropoid apes.
Insectivora.—These small animals are represented by numerous remains belonging to four families and a dozen genera. OfErinaceus(hedgehog) several species are found in the Upper Miocene; and in the Lower Miocene of Auvergne two extinct genera of the same family—AmphechinusandTetracus—have been discovered. Several species ofTalpa(mole) occur in the Upper Miocene of France, while the extinctDinylusis from Germany, andPalæospalaxfrom the Lower Miocene of the Isle ofWight. The Malayan family Tupaiidæ or squirrel-shrews, is believed to be represented byOxygomphus, a fossil discovered in South Germany (Wiesenau) by H. von Meyer. The Soricidæ or shrews, are represented by several extinct genera—Plesiosorex,MysarachneandGaleospalax; as well as byAmphisorexandMyogalestill living.Echinogale, a genus of Centetidæ now confined to Madagascar, is said to occur in the Lower Miocene of Auvergne, a most interesting determination, if correct, as it would form a transition to theSolenodonof the Antilles belonging to the same family; but I am informed by Prof. Flower that the affinities of the animals described under this name are very doubtful.
Carnivora.—BesidesFelisandMachairodus, which extend back to the Upper Miocene, there are two other genera of Felidæ,Pseudælurusin the Upper Miocene of France, andHyænodon, which occurs in the Upper and Lower Miocene of France, named from some resemblance in its teeth to the hyænas, and considered by some Palæontologists to form a distinct family, Hyænodontidæ. The Viverridæ, or civets, were very numerous, consisting of the living genusViverra, and three extinct forms—Thalassictis=Ictitherium, as large as a panther, andSoricictis, a smaller form, occurring both in France and Hungary. OfHyænidæ, there was the living genusHyæna, and the extinctHyænictis, which has occurred in Hungary as well as in Greece. The Canidæ, or wolf and fox family, were represented byPseudocyon, near toCanis;Hemicyon, intermediate between dogs and gluttons; andAmphicyon, of which several species occur in the Upper and Lower Miocene of France, some of them larger than a tiger. The Mustelidæ, or weasels, were represented by five genera, the existing generaLutra(otter) andMustela(weasel);Potamotherium, an extinct form of otter;Taxodon, allied to the badger and otter;Palæomephitisin Germany, and thePromephytis(already noticed) in Greece. The bears were represented only byHyænarctos, which has been noticed as occurring in the Pliocene, and first appears in the Upper Miocene of France. Seals are represented by a form resembling the AntarcticOtaria, remains of which occur in the Upper Miocene of France.
Cetacea(whales).—These occur frequently in the Miocene deposits, four living, and five extinct genera having been described; but these marine forms are not of much importance for our purpose.
Sirenia(sea-cows).—These are represented by two extinct genera,HalitheriumandTrachytherium. Several species of the former have been discovered, but the latter has occurred in France only, and its affinities are doubtful.
Ungulata.—Horses are represented byHipparionandAnchitherium, the latter occurring in both Upper and Lower Miocene and Eocene; whileHipparion, which is more nearly allied to living horses, first appears in the Upper Miocene and continues in the Pliocene.
Hippotherium, in the Upper Miocene of the Vienna basin, forms a transition toPaloplotherium, an Eocene genus of Tapiridæ or Palæotheridæ. Tapirs, allied to living forms, occur in both Upper and Lower Miocene. Rhinoceroses are still found in the Upper Miocene, and here first appear the four-toed hornless rhinoceros,Acerotherium. The Suidæ (swine) are rather numerous.Sus(wild boar) continued as far back as the Upper Miocene; but now there first appear a number of extinct forms which have been namedHyotherium,Palæochœrus,Chœromorus, all of a small or moderate size;Hyopotamus, nearly as large as a tapir; andAnthracotherium, nearly the size of a hippopotamus and, according to Dr. Leidy, the type of a distinct family.Listriodon, from the Upper Miocene of the Vienna basin, is sometimes classed with the tapirs.
We now come to a well-marked new family of Artiodactyle or even-toed Ungulata, theAnoplotheriidæ, which consisted of more slender long-tailed animals, allied to the swine but with indications of a transition towards the camels. The only genera that appear in the Miocene formation are,Chalicotherium, nearly as large as a rhinoceros, of which three species have been found in Germany and France; andSynaphodus, known only from its teeth, which differ somewhat from those of theAnoplotheriumwhich appears earlier in the Eocene formation. Another extinct family,AmphimericidæorXiphodontidæ, is represented by twogenera,CainotheriumandMicrotherium, in the Miocene of France. They were of very small size, and are supposed to be intermediate between the Suidæ and Tragulidæ.
The Camelopardalidæ, or giraffes, were represented in Europe in Miocene times by the giganticHelladotherium, which has been found in the south of France, and in Hungary, as well as in Greece. The chevrotains (Tragulidæ) are represented by the extinct genusHyomoschus.
The Cervidæ do not seem to have appeared in Europe before the Upper Miocene epoch, when they were represented byDorcatheriumandAmphimoschus, allied toMoschus, and also by trueCervus, as well as by small allied forms,Dremotherium,Amphitragalus(in the Lower Miocene),Micromeryx,Palæomeryx, andDicrocerus.
The Bovidæ, or hollow-horned ruminants, were not well represented in Central Europe in Miocene times. There were no sheep, goats, or oxen, and only a few antelopes of the genusTragocerus, and one allied toHippotragus; and these all lived in the Upper Miocene period, as did the more numerous forms of Greece.
Proboscidea.—The true elephants do not extend back to the Miocene period, but they are represented by the Mastodons, which had less complex teeth. These first appear in the Upper Miocene of Europe, five species being known from France, Germany, Switzerland, and Greece.Dinotherium, already noticed as occurring in Greece, extended also to Germany and France, where remains of three species have been found.
Rodentia.—A considerable number of generic forms of this order have been obtained from the Miocene strata. The principal genera areCricetodon, allied to the hamsters, numerous in both the Upper and Lower Miocene period of France;Myoxus(the dormice) in France, and an allied genus,Brachymys, in Germany. The beavers were represented by the still living genusCastor, and the extinctSteneofiberin France. The squirrels by the existingScuirusandSpermophilus; and by extinct forms,LithomysandAulacodon, in Germany, the latter resembling the African genusAulacodes. The hares, byLagomysand anextinct formTitanomys. Besides these, remains referred to the South American genera,Cavia(cavy) andDasyprocta(agouti), have been found, the former in the Upper Miocene of Switzerland, the latter in the Lower Miocene of Auvergne.Palæomys, allied to the West IndianCapromys, has been found in the same deposits; as well asTheridomys, said by Gervais to be allied toAnomalurusandEchimys, the former now living in W. Africa, the latter in S. America.
Edentata.—These are only represented by theMacrotheriumandAncylotheriumof the Grecian deposits, the former occurring also in France and Germany in Upper Miocene strata.
Marsupials.—These consist of numerous species related to the opossums (Didelphys), but separated by Gervais under the namePeratherium. They occur in both Upper and Lower Miocene beds.
Upper Miocene Deposits of the Siwalik Hills and other Localities in N. W. India.
These remarkable fresh-water deposits form a range of hills at the foot of the Himalayas, a little south of Simla. They were investigated for many years by Sir P. Cautley and Dr. Falconer, and add greatly to our knowledge of the early fauna of the Old World continent.
Primates.—Remains of the generaSemnopithecusandMacacuswere found, with other forms of intermediate character; and some teeth indicated animals allied to the orang-utan of Borneo, and of similar size.
Carnivora.—These consisted of species ofFelisandMachairodusof large size;Hyæna,Canis,Mellivora, and an allied genusUrsitaxus;Ursus, in the deposits of the Nerbudda valley (of Pliocene age);Hyænarctosas large as the cave bear;Amphicyonof the size of a polar bear (in the deposits of the Indus valley, west of Cashmere);Lutra, and an extinct allied genusEnhydrion.
Ungulata.—These are very numerous, and constitute the most important feature of this ancient fauna. Horses are represented by a species ofEquusfrom the Siwalik Hills and the Irawaddydeposits in Burmah, and by two others from the Pliocene of the Nerbudda Valley; whileHippotherium—a slender, antelope-like animal, found in the Siwalik Hills and in Europe—is supposed to form a transition from the Equidæ to the Tapiridæ. These latter are found in the Upper Indus deposits, where there is a species ofTapirus, and one of an extinct genusAntelotherium. OfRhinoceros, five extinct species have been found—in the Siwalik Hills, in Perim Island, and one at an elevation of 16,000 feet in the deserts of Thibet.Hippopotamusoccurs in the Pliocene of the Nerbudda, and is represented in the older Miocene deposits byHexaprotodon, of which three species have been found in various parts of India. Another remarkable genus,Merycopotamus, connectsHippopotamuswithAnthracotherium, one of the extinct European forms allied to the swine. These last are represented by several large species ofSus, and by the extinct European genusChœrotherium.
The extinct Anoplotheridæ are represented by a species of the European genusChalicotherium, larger than a horse.
An extinct camel, larger than the living species, was found in the Siwalik Hills.
Three species of deer (Cervus) have been found in the Siwaliks, and one in the Nerbudda deposits.
A large and a small species of giraffe (Camelopardalis) were found in the Siwalik Hills and at Perim Island.
The Bovidæ are represented by numerous species ofBos, and by the extinct generaHemibosandAmphibos. There are also three species of antelopes, one of which is allied to the AfricanAlcephalus.
We now come to an extraordinary group of extinct animals, probably forming a new family intermediate between the antelope and the giraffe. TheSivatheriumwas an enormous four-horned ruminant, larger than a rhinoceros. It had a short trunk like a tapir, the lower horns on the forehead were simple, the upper pair palmated. TheBramatherium, an allied form from Perim Island, showed somewhat more affinity for the giraffe.
Proboscidea.—No less than seven species of elephants and fourof mastodons ranged over India, their remains being found in all the deposits from the Siwalik Hills to Burmah. A largeDinotheriumhas also been found at Perim Island.
Reptiles.—Many remains of birds were found, but these have not been determined. Reptiles were numerous and interesting, the most remarkable being the huge tortoise,Colossochelys, whose shell was twelve feet long and head and neck eight feet more. Other small tortoises of the generaTestudo,Emys,TrionyxandEmydidawere found, the Emys being a living species. There were three extinct and one living species of crocodile, and one of them was larger than any now living. The only other reptile of importance was a large lizard of the genusVaranus.
General Observations on the Miocene faunas of Europe and Asia.—Comparing the three faunas of approximately the same period, and allowing for the necessarily imperfect record of each, we find a wonderful similarity of general type over the enormous area between France on the west and the Irawaddy river in Burmah on the east. We may even extend our comparison to Northern China, where remains ofHyæna,Tapir,Rhinoceros,Chalicotherium, andElephas, have been recently found, closely resembling those from the Miocene or Pliocene deposits of Europe or India, and showing that the Palæarctic region had then the same great extent from west to east that it has now. Of about forty genera comprised in the Indian Miocene fauna, no less than twenty-seven inhabited Central and Western Europe during the same epoch. The Indian Miocene fossils are much what we should expect as the forerunners of the existing fauna, the giraffes and hippopotami being the only additions from the present Ethiopian fauna. The numerous forms of the restricted bovine type, show that these probably originated in India; while the monkeys appear to be altogether of Oriental types.
In Europe, however, we meet with a totally different assemblage of animals from those that form the existing fauna. We find apes and monkeys, many large Felidæ, numerous civetsand hyænas, tapirs, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, elephants, giraffes, and antelopes, such as now characterise the tropics of Africa and Asia. Along with these we meet with less familiar types, showing relations with the Centetidæ of Madagascar, the Tupaiidæ of the Malay Islands, theCapromys, of the West Indies, and theEchimysof South America. And besides all these living types we have a host of extinct forms,—ten or twelve genera allied to swine; nine genera of tapir-like animals; four of horses; nine of wolves; with many distinct forms of the long-extinct families of Anoplotheridæ, Xiphodontidæ, and the edentate Macrotheridæ. It is almost certain that during the Miocene period Europe was not only far richer than it is now in the higher forms of life, but not improbably richer than any part of the globe now is, not excepting tropical Africa and tropical Asia.
Eocene Period.
The deposits of Eocene age are less numerous, and spread over a far more limited area, than those of the Miocene period, and only restricted portions of them furnish any remains of land animals. Our knowledge of the Eocene mammalian fauna is therefore very imperfect and will not occupy us long, as most of the new types it furnishes are of more interest to the zoologist than to the student of distribution. Some of the Eocene mammalia of Europe are, however, of interest in comparison with those of North America of the same age; while others show that ancestral types of groups now confined to Australia or to South America, then inhabited Europe.
Primates.—The only undoubted Eocene examples of this order, are theCænopithecus lemuroidesfrom the Jura, which has points of resemblance to the South American marmosets and howlers, and also to the Lemuridæ; and a cranium recently discovered in the Department of Lot (S.W. France), undoubtedly belonging to the Lemuridæ, and which most resembles that of the West African "Potto" (Perodicticus). This discovery has led to another, for it is now believed that remains formerlyreferred to the Anoplotheridæ (AdapisandAphelotheriumfrom the Upper Eocene of Paris) were also Lemurs. Some remains from the Lower Eocene of Suffolk were at first supposed to be allied toMacacus, but were subsequently referred to the Ungulate,Hyracotherium. There is still, however, some doubt as to its true affinities.
Chiroptera.—In the Upper Eocene of Paris remains of bats have been found, so closely resembling living forms as to be referred to the genusVespertilio.
Carnivora.—The only feline remains, are those ofHyænodonin the Upper Eocene of Hampshire, andPterodon, an allied form from beds of the same age in France; withÆlurogale, found in the South of France in deposits of phosphate of lime of uncertain age, but probably belonging to this period. Viverridæ (civets) are represented by two genera,Tylodon, the size of a glutton from the Upper Eocene, andPalæonyctis, allied toViverra, from the Middle Eocene of France. The Canidæ (wolves and foxes) appear to have been the most ancient of the existing types of Carnivora, five genera being represented by Eocene remains. Of these,GalethylaxandCyotheriumwere small, and with the existing genusCanisare found in the Upper Eocene of France.Arctocyon, about the size of a wolf, is a very ancient and generalised form of carnivore which can not be placed in any existing family. It is found in the Lower Eocene of France, and is thus the oldest known member of the Carnivora.
Ungulata.—These are more numerous. Equidæ (horses) are represented by the MioceneAnchitheriumin the Lower, and by a more ancient form,Anchilophus, in the Middle Eocene of France. Tapiridæ and Palæotheridæ were very numerous.Palæotheriumand the allied genusPaloplotherium, were abundant in France and England in Upper Eocene times. They somewhat resembled the tapir, with affinities for the horse and rhinoceros. A new genus,Cadurcotherium, allied to the rhinoceros and equally large, has been found in the same deposits of phosphate of lime as the lemur andÆlurogale. In the Middle Eocene of both England and France are foundLophiodonallied to the tapir,but in some of the species reaching a larger size;PropalæotheriumandPachynolophusof smaller size and having affinities for the other genera named; andPlagiolophus, a small, slender animal which Professor Huxley thinks may have been a direct ancestor of the horse. In the Lower Eocene we meet withCoryphodon, much larger than the tapir, and armed with large canine teeth;Pliolophus, a generalised type, allied to the tapir and horse; andHyracotherium, a small animal from the Lower Eocene of England, remotely allied to the tapir.
Among the Artiodactyla, or even-toed ungulates, the swine are represented by several extinct genera, of moderate or small size—Acotherium,Chœropotamus,CebochœrusandDichobune, all from the Upper and the last also from the Middle Eocene of France; butEutelodon, from the phosphate of lime deposits is large. TheDichobunewas the most generalised type, presenting the characters of many of the other genera combined, and was believed by Dr. Falconer to approach the musk-deer. TheCainotheriumof the Miocene also occurs here, and an allied genusPlesiomeryxfrom the same deposits asEuteledon.
The Eocene Anoplotheridæ were numerous. TheAnoplotheriumwas a two-toed, long-tailed Pachyderm, ranging from the size of a hog to that of an ass; the alliedEurytheriumwas four-toed; and there are one or two others of doubtful affinity. All are from the Upper Eocene of France and England.
Rodentia.—Remains referred to the generaMyoxus(dormouse) andSciurus(squirrel) have been found in the Upper Eocene of France; as well asPlesiarctomys, an extinct genus between the marmots and squirrels. The MioceneTheridomysis also found here.
Marsupials.—TheDidelphys(opossum) of Cuvier, now referred to an extinct genusPeratherium, is found in the Upper Eocene of France and England.
General Considerations on the Extinct Mammalian Fauna of Europe.—It is a curious fact that no family, and hardly a genus, of European mammalia occurs in the Pliocene deposits, without extending back also into those of Miocene age. There are,however, a few groups which, seem to be late developments or recent importations into the Palæarctic region, as they occur only in Post-Pliocene deposits. The most important of these are the badger, glutton, elk, reindeer, chamois, goat, and sheep, which only occur in caves and other deposits of Post-Pliocene age. Camels only occur in the Post-Pliocene of Siberia (Merycotherium), although a trueCamelusof large size appears to have inhabited some part of Central Asia in the Upper Miocene period, being found in the Siwalik beds. The only exclusively Pliocene genera in Europe areUrsus,Equus,Hippopotamus,Bos,Elephas,Arvicola,Trogontherium,Arctomys,HystrixandLepus; but of theseEquus,Hippopotamus,Bos, andElephasare found in the Miocene deposits of India. Owing, no doubt, in part to the superior productiveness of the various Miocene beds, large numbers of groups appear to have their origin or earliest appearance here. Such are Insectivora, Felidæ, Hyænidæ, Mustelidæ,Ursus, Equidæ,Tapirus, Rhinocerotidæ, Hippopotamidæ, Anthracotheridæ (extinct),Sus, Camelopardidæ, Tragulidæ, Cervidæ, Bovidæ, Elephantidæ, and Edentata.
Groups which go back to the Eocene period, are, Primates allied to South American monkeys, as well as some of the Lemuridæ; bats of the living genusVespertilio; Hyænodontidæ, an ancestral form of Carnivore; Viverridæ; Canidæ (to the Upper Eocene), and the ancestral Arctocyonidæ to the Lower Eocene;Hyænarctos, an ancestral type of bears and hyænas; Anchitheridæ, ancestral horses, to the Middle Eocene; Palæotheridæ, comprising numerous generalised forms, ancestors of the rhinoceros, horse, and tapir; Suidæ, with numerous generalised forms, to the Middle Eocene; Anoplotheridæ and Xiphodontidæ, ancestral families of even-toed Ungulates, connecting the ruminants with the swine; and lastly, several groups of Rodents, and a Marsupial, in the Upper Eocene. We thus find all the great types of Mammalia well developed in the earliest portion of the tertiary period; and the occurrence of Quadrumana, of the highly specialized bats (Vespertilio), of various forms of Carnivora, and of Ungulates, clearly differentiated into the odd and even-toed series, associated with such lower forms asLemurs and Marsupials—proves, that we have here hardly made an approach towards the epoch when the mammalian type itself began to diverge into its various modifications. Some of the Carnivora and Ungulates do, indeed, exhibit a less specialised structure than later forms; yet so far back as the Upper Miocene the most specialised of all carnivora, the great sabre-toothedMachairodus, makes its appearance.
The Miocene is, for our special study, the most valuable and instructive of the Tertiary periods, both on account of its superior richness, and because we here meet with many types now confined to separate regions. Such facts as the occurrence in Europe during this period of hippopotami, tapirs, giraffes, Tragulidæ, Edentata, and Marsupials—will assist us in solving many of the problems we shall meet with in reviewing the actual distribution of living forms of those groups. Still more light will, however, be thrown on the subject by the fossil forms of the American continent, which we will now proceed to examine.
EXTINCT MAMMALIA OF THE NEW WORLD.
The discoveries of very rich deposits of mammalian remains in various parts of the United States have thrown great light on the relations of the faunas of very distant regions. North America now makes a near approach to Europe in the number and variety of its extinct mammalia, and in no part of the world have such perfect specimens been discovered. In what are called the "Mauvaises terres" of Nebraska (the dried-up mud of an ancient lake), thousands of entire crania and some almost entire skeletons of ancient animals have been found, their teeth absolutely perfect, and altogether more resembling the preparations of the anatomist, than time-worn fossils such as we are accustomed to see in the museums of Europe. Other deposits have been discovered in Oregon, California, Virginia, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah, ranging over all the Tertiary epochs, from Post-Pliocene to Eocene, and furnishing a remarkable picture of the numerous strange mammalia which inhabited the ancient North American continent.
North America—Post-Pliocene Period.
Insectivora.—The only indications of this order yet discovered, consists of a single tooth of some insectivorous animal found in Illinois, but which cannot be referred to any known group.
Carnivora.—These are fairly represented. Two species ofFelisas large as a lion; the equally large extinctTrucifelis, found only in Texas; four species ofCanis, some of them largerthan wolves; two species ofGalera, a genus now confined to the Neotropical region; two bears, and an extinct genus,Arctodus; an extinct species of racoon (Procyon), and an allied extinct genus,Myxophagus—show, that at a very recent period North America was better supplied with Carnivora than it is now. Remains of the walrus (Trichechus) have also been found as far south as Virginia.
Cetacea.—Three species of dolphins belonging to existing genera, have been found in the Eastern States; and two species ofManatus, or sea-cow, in Florida and South Carolina.
Ungulata.—Six extinct horses (Equus), and oneHipparion; the living South American tapir, and a larger extinct species; aDicotyles, or peccary, and an allied genus,Platygonus; a species of the South American llamas (Auchenia), and one of a kind of camel,Procamelus; two extinct bisons; a sheep, and two musk-sheep (Ovibos); with three living and one extinct deer (Cervus), show an important increase in its Herbivora.
Proboscidea.—Two elephants and two mastodons, added to this remarkable assemblage of large vegetable-feeding quadrupeds.
Rodentia.—These consist mainly of genera and species still living in North America; the only important exceptions being a species of the South American capybara (Hydrochœrus) in South Carolina; andPraotherium, an extinct form of hare, found in a bone cave in Pennsylvania.
Edentata.—Here we meet with a wonderful assemblage, of six species belonging to four extinct genera, mostly of gigantic size. A species ofMegatherium, three ofMegalonyx, and one ofMylodon—huge terrestrial sloths as large as the rhinoceros or even as the largest elephants—ranged over the Southern States to Pennsylvania, the latter (Mylodon) going as far as the great lakes and Oregon. Another form,Ereptodon, has been found in the Mississippi Valley.
Marsupialia.—The living American genus of opossums,Didelphys, has been found in deposits of this age in South Carolina.
Remarks on the Post-Pliocene fauna of North America.—The assemblage of animals proved, by these remains, to haveinhabited North America at a comparatively recent epoch, is most remarkable. In Europe, we found a striking change in the fauna at the same period; but that consisted almost wholly in the presence of animals now inhabiting countries immediately to the north or south. Here we have the appearance of two new assemblages of animals, the one now confined to the Old World—horses, camels, and elephants; the other exclusively of South American type—llamas, tapirs, capybaras,Galera, and gigantic Edentata. The age of the various deposits in which these remains are found is somewhat uncertain, and probably extends over a considerable period of time, inclusive of the Glacial epoch, and perhaps both anterior and subsequent to it. We have here, as in Europe, the presence and apparent co-existence in the same area, of Arctic and Southern forms—the walrus and the manatee—the musk-sheep and the gigantic sloths. Unfortunately, as we shall see, the immediately preceding Pliocene deposits of North America are rather poor in organic remains; yet it can hardly be owing to the imperfection of the record of this period, thatnot oneof the South American types above numerated occurs there, while a considerable number of Old World forms are represented. Neither in the preceding wonderfully rich Miocene or Eocene periods, does anyoneof these forms occur; or, with the exception ofMorotherium, from Pliocene depositswestof the Rocky Mountains, any apparent ancestor of them! We have here unmistakable evidence of an extensive immigration from South into North America, not very long before the beginning of the Glacial epoch. It was an immigration of types altogether new to the country, which spread over all the southern and central portions of it, and established themselves sufficiently to leave abundance of remains in the few detached localities where they have been discovered. How such large yet defenceless animals as tapirs and great terrestrial sloths, could have made their way into a country abounding in large felines equal in size and destructiveness to the lion and the tiger, with numerous wolves and bears of the largest size, is a great mystery. But it is nevertheless certain that they did so; and the fact that no suchmigration had occurred for countless preceding ages, proves that some great barrier to the entrance of terrestrial mammalia which had previously existed, must for a time have been removed. We must defer further discussion of this subject till we have examined the relations of the existing faunas of North and South America.
Tertiary Period.
When we get to remains of the Tertiary age, especially those of the Miocene and Eocene epochs, we meet with so many interesting and connected types, and such curious relations with living forms in Europe, that it will be clearer to trace the history of each order and family throughout the Tertiary period, instead of considering each of the subdivisions of that period separately.
It will be well however first to note the few American Post-Pliocene or living genera that are found in the Pliocene beds. These consist of several species ofCanis, from the size of a fox to that of a large wolf; aFelisas large as a tiger; an Otter (Lutra); several species ofHipparion; a peccary (Dicotyles); a deer (Cervus); several species ofProcamelus; a mastodon; an elephant; and a beaver (Castor). It thus appears that out of nearly forty genera found in the Post-Pliocene deposits, only ten are found in the preceding Pliocene period. About twelve additional genera, however, appear there, as we shall see in going over the various orders.
Primates.—Among the vast number of extinct mammalia discovered in the Tertiary deposits of North America, no example of this order had been recognized up to 1872, when the discovery of more perfect remains showed, that a number of small animals of obscure affinities from the Lower Eocene of Wyoming, were really allied to the lemurs and perhaps also to the marmosets, the lowest form of American monkeys, but having a larger number of teeth than either. A number of other remains of small animals from the same formation, previously supposed to be allied to the Ungulata, are now shown tobelong to the Primates; so that no less than twelve genera of these animals are recognized by Mr. Marsh, who classes them in two families—Limnotheridæ, comprising the generaLimnotherium, (which had larger canine teeth),Thinolestes,Telmatolestes,Mesacodon,Bathrodon, andAntiacodonof Marsh, withNotharctos,Hipposyus,Microsyops, andPalæacodonpreviously described by Leidy;—and Lemuravidæ, consisting of the generaLemuravus(Marsh) andHyopsodus(Leidy). The animals of the latter family were most allied to existing lemurs, but were a more generalized form,Lemuravushaving forty-four teeth, the greatest number known in the order. These numerous forms ranged from the size of a small squirrel to that of a racoon. It is especially interesting to find these peculiar lemuroid forms in America, just when a lemur has been discovered of about the same age in Europe; and as the American forms are said to show an affinity with the South American marmosets, while the European animal is most allied to a West African group, we have evidently not yet got back far enough to find the primeval or ancestral type from which all the Primates sprang.
About the same time, in the succeeding Miocene formation, true monkeys were discovered. Mr. Marsh describesLaopithecusas an animal nearly the size of the largest South American monkeys, and allied both to the Cebidæ and the Eocene Limnotheridæ. Mr. Cope has describedMenotheriumfrom the Miocene of Colorado, as a lemuroid animal, the size of a cat, and perhaps allied toLimnotherium. More Miocene remains will, no doubt, be discovered, by which we shall be enabled to trace the origin of some of the existing forms of South American monkeys; and perhaps help to decide the question (now in dispute among anatomists) whether the lemurs are really Primates, or form an altogether distinct and isolated order of mammalia.
Insectivora.—This order is represented by comparatively few forms in the tertiary beds, and these are all very different from existing types. In the Upper Miocene of Dakota are found remains indicating two extinct genera,LepictisandIctops. In the Miocene of Colorado, Professor Cope has recently discovered four new genera,Isacis; allied to the preceding, but as large as aMephitisor skunk;Herpetotherium, near the moles;Embasis, more allied to the shrews; andDommina, of uncertain affinities. Two others have been found in the Eocene of Wyoming;Amomys, having some resemblance to hedgehogs and to the EasternTupaia; andWashakius, of doubtful affinities.
Far back in the Triassic coal of North Carolina has been found the jaw of a small mammal (Dromotherium), the teeth of which somewhat resemble those of the AustralianMyrmecobius, and may belong either to the Insectivora or Marsupials; if indeed, at that early period these orders were differentiated.
Carnivora.—The most ancient forms of this order are some remains found in the Middle Eocene of Wyoming, and others recently described by Professor Cope (1875) from the Eocene of New Mexico, of perhaps earlier date. The former consist of three genera,Patriofelis,Uintacyon, andSinopa,—animals of large size but which cannot be classed in any existing family; and two others,MesonyxandSynoplotherium, believed by Mr. Cope to be allied toHyænodon. The latter consist of four genera,—Oxyæna, consisting of several species, some as large as a jaguar, was allied toHyænodonandPterodon;Pachyæna, allied to the last;Prototomus, allied toAmphicyonand the Viverridæ; andLimnocyon, a civet-like carnivore with resemblances to the Canidæ.
In the Miocene formations we find the Feline type well developed. The wonderfulMachairodus, which in Europe lived down to Post-Pliocene times, is found in the Upper Miocene of Dakota; and perfect crania have been discovered, showing that the chin was lengthened downwards to receive and protect the enormous canines.Dinyctiswas allied both toMachairodusand to the weasels. Three new genera have been lately described by Professor Cope from the Miocene of Colorado,—Bunælurus, with characters of both cats and weasels;Daptophilus, allied toDinyctis; andHoplophoneus, more allied toMachairodus. The Canidæ are represented byAmphicyon, which occurs in deposits of the same age in Europe; and byCanis, four species of which genus are recorded by Professor Cope from the Miocene of Colorado, and it also occurs in the Pliocene. TheHyænodonis represented by three species in the Miocene of Dakota and Colorado. It occursalso in the European Miocene and Upper Eocene formations, and constitutes a distinct family Hyænodontidæ, allied, according to Dr. Leidy, to wolves, cats, hyænas and weasels. The Ursidæ are represented by only one species of an extinct genus,Leptarchus, from the Pliocene of Nebraska. From the Pliocene of Colorado, Prof. Cope has recently describedTomarctos, as a "short-faced type of dog;" well as species ofCanisandMartes.
Ungulata.—The animals belonging to this order being usually of large size and accustomed to feed and travel in herds, are liable to wholesale destruction by floods, bogs, precipices, drought or hunger. It is for these reasons, probably, that their remains are almost always more numerous than those of other orders of mammalia. In America they are especially abundant; and the number of new and intermediate types about whose position there is much difference of opinion among Palæontologists, renders it very difficult to give a connected summary of them with any approach to systematic accuracy.
Beginning with the Perissodactyla, or odd-toed ungulates, we find the Equine animals remarkably numerous and interesting. The true horses of the genusEquus, so abundant in the Post-Pliocene formations, are represented in the Pliocene by several ancestral forms. The most nearly allied toEquusisPliohippus, consisting of animals about the size of an ass, with the lateral toes not externally developed, but with some differences of dentition. Next comeProtohippusandHipparion, in which the lateral toes are developed but are small and functionless. Then we have the allied genera,Anchippus,Merychippus, andHyohippus, related to the EuropeanHippotherium, which were all still smaller animals,Protohippusbeing only 2½ feet high. In the older deposits we come to a series of forms, still unmistakably equine, but with three or more toes used for locomotion and with numerous differentiations in form, proportions, and dentition. These constitute the family Anchitheridæ. In the Miocene we have the generaAnchitherium(found also in the European Miocene),MiohippusandMesohippus, all with three toes on each foot, and about the size of a sheep or large goat. In the Eocene ofUtah and Wyoming, we get a step further back, several species having been discovered about the size of a fox with four toes in front and three behind. These form the genusOrohippus, and are the oldest ancestral horse known. Prof. Marsh points out the remarkably perfect series of forms in America, which, beginning with this minute ancient type, is gradually modified by gaining increased size, increased speed by concentration of the limb-bones, elongation of the head and neck, the canine teeth decreased in size, the molars becoming longer and being coated with cement—till we at last come to animals hardly distinguishable, specifically, from the living horse.
Allied to these, are a series of forms showing a transition to the tapirs, and to thePalæotheriumof the European Eocene. In the Pliocene we haveParahippus; in the MioceneLophiodon, found in the same formation and in the Eocene of Europe, and allied to the tapir; and in the Eocene,Palæosyops, as large as a rhinoceros, which had large canines and was allied to the tapir andPalæotherium;Limnohyus, forming the type of a family Limnohyidæ, which included the last genus and some others mentioned further on; andHyrachyus, allied toLophiodon, and toHyracodonan extinct form of rhinoceros. Besides these we haveLophiotherium(also from the Eocene of Europe);Diplacodonallied toLimnohyus, but with affinities to modern Perissodactyla and nearly as large as a rhinoceros; andColonoceras, also belonging to the Limnohyidæ, an animal which was the size of a sheep, and had divergent protuberances or horns on its nose. A remarkable genus,Bathmodon, lately described by Professor Cope, and of which five species have been found in the Eocene of New Mexico and Wyoming, is believed to form the type of a new family, having some affinity toPalæosyopsand to the extinct Brontotheridæ. It had large canine tusks but no horns.
The Rhinocerotidæ are represented in America by the genusRhinocerosin the Pliocene and Miocene, and byAceratheriumandHyracodonin the Miocene. Both the latter were hornless, andHyracodonwas allied to the EoceneHyrachyus, one of the Lophiodontidæ. In the Eocene and Miocene deposits of Utah, and Oregon, several remarkable extinct rhinoceroses have beenrecently discovered, forming the genusDiceratherium. These had a pair of nasal horns placed side by side on the snout, not behind each other as in existing two-horned rhinoceroses, the rest of their skeleton resembling the hornlessAceratherium. They were of rather small size.
Next to these extinct rhinoceroses come the Brontotheridæ, an extraordinary family of large mammalia, some of which exceeded in bulk the largest living rhinoceros. They had four toes to the front and three to the hind feet, with a pair of large divergent horns on the front of the head, in both sexes. Professor Marsh and Dr. Leidy have described four genera,Brontotherium,Titanotheium,Megacerops, andAnisacodon, distinguished by peculiarities of dentition. Though most nearly allied to the rhinoceroses, they show some affinity for the gigantic Dinocerata of the Eocene to be noticed further on. Professor Cope has since described another genus,Symborodon, from the Miocene of Colorado, with no less than seven species, one nearly the size of an elephant. He thinks they had a short tapir-like proboscis. The species differ greatly in the form of the cranium and development of the horn-bearing processes.
We commence the Artiodactyla, or even-toed Ungulates, with the hog tribe. These are represented by species of peccaries, (Dicotyles) from the Pliocene of Nebraska and Oregon; and by an allied formThinohyus, very likeDicotyles, but having an additional premolar tooth and a much smaller brain-cavity. From the Miocene are three allied genera,Nanohyus,Leptochœrus, andPerchœrus. Professor Cope, however, thinksLeptochœrusmay be Lemuroid, and allied toMenotherium. The Anthracotheridæ, a family which connects the Hippopotamidæ and Ruminants, and which occurs in the Miocene of Europe and India, are represented in America by the genusHyopotamusfrom the Miocene of Dakota, andElotheriumfrom the Miocene of Oregon and the Eocene of Wyoming; the latter genus being sometimes classed with the preceding family, and lately placed by Professor Marsh, in the new order, Tillodontia. Professor Cope has since described three other genera from the Eocene of NewMexico:Meniscotherium, having resemblances toPalæosyops,Hyopotamus, and the Limnotheridæ;Phenacodus, the size of a hog, of doubtful position, but perhaps nearElotherium; andAchænodon, as large as a cow, but more hog-like than the preceding. Another new genus from the Miocene of Colorado—Pelonax—is said by Professor Cope to come betweenElotheriumandHippopotamus.
The Camelidæ are very abundant, and form one of the most striking features of the ancient fauna of America.Procamelus,Homocamelus, andMegalomeryx, are extinct genera found in the Pliocene formation; the first very closely allied to the Old World camel, the last smaller and more sheep-like. In the Miocene two other genera occur,PœbrotheriumandProtomeryx, the former allied to both the camel and the llama.
Deer are represented by a single species ofCervusin the Pliocene, while two extinct genera,LeptomeryxandMerycodus, are found in the Miocene deposits, the latter indicating a transition between camels and deer. Two other genera,HypisodusandHypertragulus, of very small size, are said by Professor Cope to be allied to the Tragulidæ and toLeptomeryx.
The Bovidæ, or hollow-horned ruminants, are only represented in the Newer Pliocene by a single species of an extinct genus,Casoryx, said to be intermediate between antelopes and deer.
We now come to an exclusively American family, theOreodontidæ, which consisted of small animals termed by Dr. Leidy, "ruminating hogs," and which had some general structural resemblances to deer and camels. They abounded in North America during the Pliocene, and especially during the Miocene epoch, no less than six genera and twenty species having been discovered.Merychuscontains the Pliocene forms; whileOreodon,Eporeodon,Merychochœrus,Leptauchenia, andAgriochœrusare Miocene. The last genus extends back into the Eocene period, and shows affinity to the European Anoplotheridæ of the same epoch.
Proboscidea.—The Elephantidæ are only represented in America by one species ofMastodonand one ofElephas, in the Newer Pliocene deposits. In the Older Pliocene, Miocene,and Upper Eocene, no remains of this order have been found; and in 1869, Dr. Leidy remarked on the small average size of the extinct North American mammalia, which were almost all smaller than their living analogues. Since then, however, wonderful discoveries have been made in deposits of Middle Eocene age in Wyoming and Colorado, of a group of huge animals not only rivalling the elephants in size, but of so remarkable and peculiar a structure as to require the formation of a new order of mammals—Dinocerata—for their reception.
This order consists of animals with generalised Ungulate and Proboscidean affinities. The lower jaw resembles that of the hippopotamus; they had five toes on the anterior feet and four on the posterior; three pairs of horns, the first pair on the top of the head, large and perhaps palmated, the second pair above the eyes, while the third and smallest stood out sideways on the snout. They had enormous upper canines, of which the roots entered the middle horn cores, no upper incisors, and small molars. Professor Marsh believes that they had no trunk. The remains discovered indicate four genera,Dinoceras(3 sp.),Tinoceras(2 sp.),Uintatherium(1 sp.), andEobasileus(2 sp.). Many other names have been given to fragments of these animals, and even those here given may not be all distinct.
Another new order, Tillodontia, recently established by Professor Marsh, is perhaps yet more remarkable in a zoological point of view, since it combines the characters of Carnivora, Ungulata, and Rodents. These animals have been formed into two families, Tillotheridæ and Stylinodontidæ; and three genera,Tillotherium,Anchippodus, andStylinodontia. All are from the Eocene of Wyoming and New Jersey. Perhaps to these must be addedElotheriumfrom the Miocene of Dakota, the other forms being all Eocene. They were mostly animals of small size, between that of the capybara and tapir. The skull resembled in form that of a bear; the molar teeth were of Ungulate type, and the incisors like those of a Rodent; but the skeleton was more that of the Ursidæ, the feet being plantigrade. Professor Cope has since described three new genera from the Eocene of New Mexico,Ectoganus,Calamodon, andEsthonyx, comprisingseven species allied toTillotheriumandAnchippodus, and having also relations, as Professor Cope believes, with the South American Toxodontidæ.
Rodentia.—This order is represented in the Pliocene by a beaver, a porcupine, and an American mouse (Hesperomys), all extinct species of living genera, theHystrixbeing an Old World type; and Professor Cope has recently describedPanolax, a new genus of hares from the Pliocene of New Mexico. The Miocene deposits have furnished an extinct genus allied to the hares—Palæolagus; one of the squirrel family—Ischyromys; a small extinct form of beaver—Palæocastor; and an extinct mouse—Eumys. The Eocene strata of Wyoming have lately furnished two extinct forms of squirrel,ParamysandSciuravus; and another of the Muridæ (or mouse family),Mysops.
Cetacea.—Numerous remains of dolphins and whales, belonging to no less than twelve genera, mostly extinct, have been found in the Miocene deposits of the Atlantic and Gulf States, from New Jersey to South Carolina and Louisiana; while seven genera of the extinct family, Zeuglodontidæ, have been found in Miocene and Eocene beds of the same districts. Some remains associated with these are doubtfully referred to the Seal family (Phocidæ) among the Carnivora.
Edentata.—Till quite recently no remains of this order have occurred in any North American deposits below the Post-Pliocene; but in 1874 Prof. Marsh described some remains allied toMegalonyxandMylodon, from the Pliocene beds of California and Idaho, and forming a new genus,Morotherium. As these remains have only occurred to the west of the Rocky Mountains, and in Pliocene deposits whose exact age is not ascertained, they hardly affect the remarkable absence of this group from the whole of the exceedingly rich Tertiary deposits in all other parts of North America.
General Relations of the extinct Tertiary Mammalia of North America and Europe.—Having now given a sketch of the extinct Mammalia which inhabited Europe and North America during the Tertiary period, we are enabled by comparing them,to ascertain their relations to each other, and to see how far they elucidate the problem of the birth-place and subsequent migrations of the several families and genera. We have already pointed out the remarkable features of the Quaternary (or Post-Pliocene) fauna of North America, and now proceed to discuss that of the various Tertiary periods, which is closely connected with the extinct fauna of Europe.
The Tertiary Mammalia of North America at present described belong to from eighty to one hundred genera, while those of Europe are nearly double that number; yet only eighteen genera are common to the two faunas, and of these eight are living and belong chiefly to the Pliocene period. Taking first, the genera which in America do not go back beyond the Pliocene period (ten in number), we find that eight of them in Europe go back to the Upper Miocene. These areFelis,Pseudælurus,Hipparion,Cervus,Mastodon,Elephas(in India),CastorandHystrix; while another,Canis, goes back to the Upper Eocene and the tenth,Equus, confined to the newer Pliocene or perhaps to the Post-Pliocene in America, extends back to the older Pliocene in Europe. Of the seven European genera which are confined to the Miocene period in America, three,Hyænodon,Anchitherium, andLophiodongo back to the Eocene in Europe; three others,Machairodus,Rhinoceros, andAceratherium, are also of Miocene age in Europe;Amphicyongoes back to the Lower Miocene of Europe.Lophiotheriumbelongs to the Eocene of both countries.
If we turn now to families instead of genera, we find that the same general rule prevails. Mustelidæ (weasels), Ursidæ (bears), true Equidæ (horses), and Bovidæ (oxen &c.), go no further back in America than the Pliocene, while they all go back to the Miocene in Europe. Suidæ (swine) and Anoplotheridæ (extinct) are found in the American Miocene and in the European Eocene. Anchitheridæ (extinct) reach the Upper Eocene in America, while in Europe they range through Upper, Middle, and Lower Eocene. Cervidæ (deer) alone are Miocene in both countries. There remain two families in which America has the preeminence. Camelidæ (camels) were wonderfully developed inthe American Pliocene and Miocene periods, abounding in genera and species; whereas in Europe the group only exists in the Post-Pliocene or Lower Pliocene, with one Upper Miocene species ofCamelusin N. India. The Anthracotheridæ (extinct), found only in the Upper Miocene of France and India, reach even the Lower Eocene in America.
These facts may be due, in part, to a want of strict co-ordination between the Tertiary deposits of Europe and North America,—in part to the imperfection of the record in the latter country. Yet it does not seem probable that they are altogether due South America and well marked differences to imperfect knowledge; yet we find such important families as the Civets, Hyænas, Giraffes, and Hippopotami absent from America, with the Weasels, and Antelopes almost so; while America possesses almost all the Camelidæ, two peculiar orders, Dinocerata and Tillodontia, and four remarkably peculiar families, Limnotheridæ, Lemuravidæ, Oreodontidæ and Brontotheridæ. If then the facts at present known represent approximately the real time-relations of the groups in question on the two continents, they render it probable that weasels, bears, true horses, swine, oxen, sheep and antelopes, originated on the Old World continent, and were transmitted to America during some part of the Miocene period; while camels originated in the New World, and somewhere about the same time passed over to Europe. Of the extinct families common to the two hemispheres, the Anthracotheridæ alone seem to have had an American origin. Of the genera common to the two countries, almost all seem to have had a European origin, the only genera of equal date being the two rhinoceroses and three Anchitheridæ; but if the Brontotheridæ are allied to the Rhinocerotidæ, these latter may have originated in America, although now an exclusively Old World type. These conclusions are not improbable when we consider the much greater size of the Old World continents, extending far into the tropics and probablyalways more or less united to the tropical areas; while the evidence of the extinct mammalia themselves shows, that South America has been for the most part isolated from the northern continent, and did not take part in the development of its characteristic Tertiary fauna.