Chapter 21

[155]Queen Eleanor was a remarkable woman. At the age of thirteen she was the author of a heroic poem, and in the following year became a wife. Piers of Langtoft describes her as"The fayrest Maye in lyfe,Her name Elinore of gentle nurture,Beyond the sea there was no such creature."[156]Naunton's "Fragmenta Regalia," p. 38.[157]"The Fyrste Dyaloge in Englys, between a Doctoure of Dyvynyte and a Student in the Lawes of England" (1539).[158]Judicature Act of 1873, section 24.[159]His barbarous treatment of the wretched Anne Askew is notorious. For denying that the sacramental blood and wine lost their material elements after consecration, Anne was condemned to be tortured, and the Lord Chancellor with his own hands stretched the rack on which the unfortunate woman was bound, in the hope of extracting a confession. It must, however, be admitted that Wriothesley's heart was not entirely impervious to emotion, for when, as Lord Chancellor, he announced the death of Henry VIII. in the House of Lords, he could not refrain from bursting into tears.[160]He was, however, an able lawyer, and reserved his orgies for private life. "If my Lord Jefferies exceeded the bounds of temperance now and then in an evening, it does not follow that he was drunk on the bench or in council." (Campbell's "Lives," vol. iii. p. 595note.)[161]Roger North's "Life of Lord Guilford," vol. ii. p. 167. (The wordroiled, so we are informed, was an import from the American plantations.)[162]"If we wish to be in a state of security," he said, in 1859, "if we wish to maintain our great interests, if we wish to maintain our honour, it is necessary that we should have a power measured by that of any two possible adversaries."[163]H. Crabb Robinson's "Diary," vol. iii. p. 453.[164]"Commentaries," vol. iii. p. 47.[165]Sir Robert Harley, Chancellor in 1757, was not made a peer until 1764. In 1830, Brougham took his seat on the Woolsack as a Commoner, and at least one other Chancellor has since followed his example.[166]Roscoe's "Eminent British Lawyers," p. 258. Other Chancellors were sprung from equally humble origin. Edward Sugden, afterwards Lord St. Leonards, was the son of a barber. To him is attributed a repartee similar to that made many years earlier by Colonel Birch, M.P., who was taunted with having in his youth been a carrier. "It is true, as the gentleman says, I once was a carrier," replied Birch. "But let me tell the gentleman that it is very fortunate for him that he never was a carrier; for, if he had been, he would be a carrier still." See Burnet's "History of His Own Time," p. 259.[167]Hawkins's "Memoirs," vol. ii. p. 312.[168]He declared, on a famous occasion, that his debt of gratitude to His Majesty was ample, for the many favours he had graciously conferred upon him, which, when he forgot, might his God forget him! Wilkes, who was present, muttered, "God forget you! He will see you d——d first!" while Burke remarked that to escape the memory of the Almighty would be the very best thing Thurlow could hope for.[169]Page 430.[170]Twiss's "Life of Eldon," vol. i. p. 214.[171]Lord Ellenborough was once asked by his hostess after dinner to cease conversing with his host—a judge—and to give the ladies some conversation, as he had been talking law long enough. "Madam," he replied, "I beg your pardon; we have not been talking law, or anything like law. We have been talking of one of the decisions of Lord Loughborough."—Campbell's "Lives," vol. vi. p. 251.[172]Bagehot's "Literary Studies," vol. i. p. 150.[173]Like Lord Bacon, too, he compiled an indifferent "Anecdote Book." Bacon's "Collection of Apothegms," was supposed to have been taken down from his dictation all on "one rainy day," but neither the brevity of the time nor the inclemency of the weather is a sufficient excuse for so poor a production.[174]These occasionally took the form of lampoons in verse, such as the following:—The Derivation of Chancellor"The Chancellor, so says Lord Coke,Histitlefrom Cancello took;And ev'ry cause before him triedIt was his duty todecide.Lord Eldon, hesitating ever,Takes it from Chanceler, towaver,And thinks, as this may bear him out,His bounden duty is todoubt."Pryme's "Recollections," p. 111.[175]"There never was anything like the admiration excited by Brougham's speech. Lord Harrowby, G. Somerset, Mr. Montagu, and Granville told me it was in eloquence, ability, and judicious management beyond almost anything they ever heard."—Lady Granville's "Letters" (to Lady G. Morpeth, 5 October, 1820), vol. i. p. 181.[176]The Duke of Wellington once chaffed Brougham, saying that he would only be known hereafter as the inventor of a carriage. The Chancellor retorted by remarking that the Duke would only be remembered as the inventor of a pair of boots. "D—— the boots!" said Wellington. "I had quite forgotten them; you have the best of it!"[177]Russell's "Recollections," p. 138.[178]Blackstone's "Commentaries," vol. iii. p. 47.[179]Lord Eldon, who dearly loved a joke, wrote as follows to his friend, Dr. Fisher, of the Charter House, who had applied to him for a piece of preferment then vacant—"Dear Fisher,"I cannot, to-day, give you the preferment for which you ask."I remain, your sincere friend,"Eldon."Turn over."(On the other side of the page he added)"I gave it to you yesterday.""Life of Eldon," vol. ii. p. 612.[180]The same difficulty arose in 1878, when Queen Victoria solved it by following the precedent set in 1831, and divided the Seal between Lord Cairns and his predecessor.[181]"The Runnymede Letters," p. 230.[182]Hakewell gives a list of Hungerford's predecessors in the Chair, which includes Sir Peter de la Mare, commissioned by Parliament to rebuke Edward III. for his misconduct with Alice Perrers, and imprisoned for so doing.[183]Phillips's "Curran and his Contemporaries," p. 88.[184]July 16, 1610.[185]Palgrave's "House of Commons," p. 51.[186]"The Institutes of the Laws of England," fourth part (1648), p. 8.[187]Carlyle's "Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell," vol. i. p. 88. Until comparatively recently it was not permissible for a Speaker to leave the Chair until, at the instigation of some member, the motion "that this House do now adjourn" had been put. In this connexion a pathetic story is told of Speaker Denison. On one occasion the House broke up rather hurriedly, and the necessary formula for releasing the Speaker was forgotten. He was consequently compelled to remain a lonely prisoner in the Chair until some good-natured member could be brought back to set him free.[188]After his dismissal from the House of Commons, Sir John Trevor lived quietly at home and amassed money. His miserly habits became notorious. Once when he was dining alone and drinking a bottle of wine, a cousin was introduced by a side door. "You rascal," said Trevor to his servant; "how dare you bring this gentleman up the back stairs? Take him instantly down the back stairs and bring him up thefrontstairs!" In vain did the cousin remonstrate. While he was being ceremoniously conveyed down one staircase and up the other his host cleared the dinner table, and he returned to find the bottles and glasses replaced by books and papers. Campbell's "Lives of the Chancellors," vol. v. pp. 59-60.[189]Sir Arnold Savage, Speaker in Henry VI.'s time, was so voluble, and addressed the King so often, and at such length, that the latter's patience became exhausted, and he asked that all requests from the Commons might hereafter be addressed to him in writing.[190]In 1818, on the election of Manners Sutton.[191]Dr. Johnson's "Debates in Parliament," vol. ii. p. 2.[192]Of his nominee for the Speakership Lord John declared that he had "parts, temper, and constitution." "And he has," he added, "besides the principle of common honesty, which would prevent him from doing wrong, a principle of nice honour, which will always urge him to do right. By honour I do not mean a fashionable mistaken principle, which would only lead a man to court popular reputation, and avoid popular disgrace, whether the opinion on which they are founded is false or true; whether the conduct which they require is in itself just or unjust, or its consequences hurtful or beneficial to mankind. I mean a quality which is not satisfied with doing right, when it is merely the alternative of doing wrong, which prompts a man to do what he might lawfully and honestly leave undone; which distinguishes a thousand different shades in what is generally denominated the same colour, and is as much superior to a mere conformity to prescribed rules as forgiving a debt is to paying what we owe." "Parliamentary History," vol. xvi. p. 737.[193]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 449.[194]"The Rolliad."[195]Horace Walpole's "Letters," vol. vii. p. 340. (This Speaker's criticism of the royal expenditure on a later occasion roused the animosity of George III., and cost him the loss of the Chair.)[196]May's "Constitutional History," vol. i. p. 503 n.[197]"People say, when you get on the blind side of a man, you get into his favour; but it is quite the reverse with the members when they get on the blind side of the Speaker." Pearson's "Political Dictionary," p. 53.[198]When Trevor was Master of the Rolls, a post he combined with that of Speaker, it was said that if Justice were blind, Equity was now seen to squint![199]Barnes's "Political Portraits," p. 218.[200]None of these chairs is to be found at Clandon, nor has the Onslow family any record of their existence, so perhaps the story of this particular perquisite is nothing but a legend and a myth.[201]Pellew's "Life of Sidmouth," vol. i. p. 368.[202]"Diary of Lord Colchester," February 2, 1796.[203]Dalling's "Historical Characters," vol. ii. p. 181.[204]Townsend's "History of the House of Commons."[205]"Croker Papers," vol. ii. p. 164.[206]Pellew's "Life of Sidmouth," vol. i. p. 66.[207]"Ceremony," says Selden, "keeps up all things; 'tis like a penny glass to a rich spirit, or some excellent water; without it the water will be spilt, the spirit lost."[208]They even carry lighted lanterns, though the whole place is ablaze with electric light![209]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 630.[210]Sir George de Lacy Evans (1787-1870) was the last member honoured by being allowed to retain the seat in which he had received his vote of thanks.[211]Grant's "Random Recollections," p. 7.[212]"Hudibras," vol. i. p. 120. During the first years of the Long Parliament Elsynge brought so much distinction to the position that his authority was said to be greater than that of the Speaker (Lenthall). His abilities, "especially in taking and expressing the sense of the House," became so conspicuous that "more reverence was paid to his stool than to the Speaker's chair."—Wood's "Athenæ Oxonienses," vol. iii. p. 363.[213]Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 251 n.[214]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 688.[215]"Modus Tenendi Parliamentum," p. 46.[216]Torrens' "Life of Graham," vol. ii. p. 30.[217]Elsynge's "Parliaments of England," pp. 160 and 161.[218]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 549.[219]Townsend's "History of the House of Commons", vol. i. p. 228.[220]"The Order for Proceeding to the Parliament" (from the MS. at the College of Arms).[221]For a particularly servile speech of this kind see "The Sovereign's Prerogative," p. 7.[222]"Observations, Rules and Orders collected out of Divers Journals of the House of Commons," p. 25.[223]A peer in support contended that otherwise a Jew might become Lord Chancellor. "Why not?" asked Lord Lyndhurst, in an undertone. "Daniel would have made a very good one!" (Atlay's "Victorian Chancellors," vol. i. p. 61.)[224]Failure to take the oath only prevents a member from sitting within the Bar, voting in divisions, and taking part in debate. It does not disqualify him from the other privileges of membership, nor does it render his seat vacant.[225]In 1792 a sample dagger was sent from France to a Birmingham firm, who were asked to make 3000 more of similar pattern. They thought the order suspicious, and consulted the Secretary of State. Burke happened to call at the latter's office, saw the dagger there, and borrowed it. During the Second Reading of the Aliens Bill he hurled this weapon on to the floor of the House, exclaiming, "Let us keep French principles from our heads, and French daggers from our hearts!" The Commons were not impressed, and only laughed, while Sheridan whispered to a neighbour, "The gentleman has brought us the knife, but where is the fork?" Another attempt at dramatic effect, equally unsuccessful, occurred on the second reading of the Reform Bill in 1831. Lord Brougham spoke for four hours, fortified by frequent draughts of mulled port. At the end he exclaimed, "By all the ties that bind every one of us to our common order and our common country, I solemnly adjure you—yea, on my bended knees, I supplicate you—reject not this Bill!" With these words he fell upon his knees, and remained in this attitude so long that his friends, fearing that he was suffering as much from mulled port as emotion, picked him up and replaced him on the Woolsack.[226]Bradlaugh is not the only politician who has failed to interpret the words of the Oath in too literal a sense. Walpole became possessed of some treasonable letters written by William Shippen, a Jacobite and violent opponent of his. Walpole sent for Shippen, and burnt the incriminating papers in his presence. Later on, when Shippen was taking the oath of allegiance in the Commons, Walpole, who stood near and knew the other's principles to be as treasonable as ever, smiled. "Egad! Robin," said Shippen, "that's hardly fair!"[227]Hatsell adds that it was contrary to custom for members so introduced to appear in top-boots. Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 85.[228]Peeresses cannot claim the right to be present, but are allowed to attend in accordance with a privilege of long standing, which adds much to the beauty of the ceremony. Judges have always enjoyed the right of attendance. In old days they took a prominent part in the public business of the House, but were not regular members, and, though they gave their legal opinions upon constitutional questions before Parliament, could neither vote nor join in debate.[229]If Parliament is opened by Commission, Black Rod is sent todesire(not tocommand) the attendance of the Commons, and the King's Speech is read by the Lord Chancellor.[230]O'Connell's "Experiences," vol. i. p. 9.[231]Hatsell says that such expressions were "very opprobrious," and might not unfitly have been applied "to the Peasants of France or the Boores of Germany." "Precedents," vol. i. p. 237.[232]In 1860 such occurrences were prevented by the seats being balloted for by the Commons. "The faithful Commons being elected by ballot," as we read in "The Times" of January 25, "not now as formerly rushing in like the gods in the gallery on Boxing Night; on the contrary, they came steadily up to the Bar, the Speaker leading, and on his right Lord Palmerston." Today the system of balloting is again employed, and a much larger space both on the ground and in the galleries is allotted to the Commons.[233]The Cockpit was pulled down in 1733, but the name continued to be given to the Treasury meeting-room. See Dodington's "Diary": "Went to the Cockpit to a prize cause," p. 72 (1828).[234]"November 20, 1798. Called on Sir Francis Burdett, who had just been reading in the newspaper the King's intended Speech to-day (which for some sessions past has been published the morning before it is spoken)." Holcroft's "Memoirs," p. 229.[235]It was burnt by the hangman in Palace Yard. Waldegrave's "Memoirs," p. 89.[236]Twiss's "Life of Eldon," vol. ii. p. 359.[237]O'Flanagan's "Lives of the Irish Chancellors," vol. ii. p. 541. (The same simile was used by Boswell. See Croker's "Dr. Johnson," vol. iii. p. 41.)[238]Forster's "Sir John Eliot," vol. i. p. 405.[239]Select Committees met in 1837, 1848, 1854, 1861 and 1871, and a Joint Committee of both Houses considered the question in 1869.[240]Pryme's "Recollections," p. 220.[241]Scobell's "Rules and Customs of Parliament," p. 19.[242]"Orders, Proceedings, Punishments, and Privileges," etc. ("Harleian Miscellany," vol. v. p. 259.)[243]Forster's "Grand Remonstrance," p. 206 n.[244]Torrens' "Life of Melbourne," vol. ii. p. 375.[245]Grant's "Recollections of the House of Lords," p. 407. Lord Alvanley was the sporting peer who out hunting met a well-known West End artist in pastry who was having some trouble with his horse. "I can't hold him," said the confectioner, "he's so devilish hot!" "Why don't you ice him, Mr. Gunter?" said Lord Alvanley.—(Maddyn's "Chiefs of States," vol. ii. p. 214.)[246]Harford's "Recollections of Wilberforce," p. 93. An exception to this rule was made on November 4, 1909, when, in accordance with the general wish of the House, the Speaker permitted the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition to speak, although both had already joined in the debate on the previous night.[247]Sir Wilfred Lawson was once sarcastically referred to as "the honourable and amusing baronet" (See "Men and Manners," p. 152.)[248]"Orders, Proceedings, Punishments, and Privileges of the Commons" ("Harleian Miscellany," vol. v. p. 8).[249]"The House has a character of its own. Like all great public collections of men, it possesses a marked love of virtue and an abhorrence of vice. But among vices there is none which the House abhors in the same degree withobstinacy" ("Works and Correspondence," vol. iii. p. 215).[250]The last instance of this occurred on May 6, 1884, when Lord Waveney was addressing the House.[251]"I must say that it (the House of Commons) would be a better machine if men were a little less vain, and would adopt a policy of silence. If they would be anxious to get through the business of the House without so much anxiety for self-exhibition as I have sometimes observed, I think the House of Commons might do a good deal more work, and very much better work than it does at present."—Speech at the Fishmongers' Hall, April 27, 1881.[252]Grant's "Recollections," p. 53. Nowadays no member can make this motion more than once.[253]Molesworth's "History of the Reform Bill," p. 214.[254]See "Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion," p. 219.[255]With regard to those well-worn expressions, the "sense" of the House and the "feeling" of the House, it has been stated that the House of Commons has more sense and feeling than any one who sits upon its benches: "The collective wisdom of Parliament exceeds the wisdom of any single head therein."[256]Pike's "Constitutional History," p. 267.[257]Peeresses may also claim this as a right.[258]Townsend's "History," vol. i. p. 253.[259]Raikes's "Journal," vol. i. p. 320.[260]"Table Talk," p. 109.[261]Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 241 n.[262]Lord Russell's "Essays and Sketches," p. 346.[263]Oldfield's "History of the House of Commons," vol. i. p. 420.[264]"Diary and Letters of Mme. D'Arblay," vol. iv.[265]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 341.[266]Ward was expelled for forgery. He is referred to in Pope's "Dunciad"—"As thick as eggs at Ward in pillory."—Book iii. line 34.[267]"Lex Parliamentaria," pp. 94, 101.[268]Sir Walter had lodged information of scandalous words spoken by certain individuals. See Lister's "Life of Clarendon," vol. iii. p. 125.[269]Petyt's "Miscellanea Parliamentaria," p. 64.[270]In bygone days his duties evidently entailed much pedestrian exercise, as may be gathered from an Order of the House issued in Queen Elizabeth's time. "Upon Motion of the House" (say the records), "in regard to the Infirmity and Pains in the Sergeant's Feet, he is licensed by the House to ride a Footcloth Nag." "Observations, Rules, and Orders Collected out of Divers Journals of the House of Commons" (1717), p. 138.[271]"Rot. Parl;" vol. v. 239-240.[272]Cockburn's "Life of Jeffrey," vol. ii. p. 354.[273]Nicholas's "Proceedings of the Privy Council," vol. vi. p. lxv.[274]"Modus Tenendi Parliamentum," p. 28.[275]"Brief Register of Parliamentary Writs," p. 672.[276]Forster's "Grand Remonstrance," p. 316 n.[277]Townsend's "History," vol. iii. p. 377.

[155]Queen Eleanor was a remarkable woman. At the age of thirteen she was the author of a heroic poem, and in the following year became a wife. Piers of Langtoft describes her as

"The fayrest Maye in lyfe,Her name Elinore of gentle nurture,Beyond the sea there was no such creature."

[156]Naunton's "Fragmenta Regalia," p. 38.

[157]"The Fyrste Dyaloge in Englys, between a Doctoure of Dyvynyte and a Student in the Lawes of England" (1539).

[158]Judicature Act of 1873, section 24.

[159]His barbarous treatment of the wretched Anne Askew is notorious. For denying that the sacramental blood and wine lost their material elements after consecration, Anne was condemned to be tortured, and the Lord Chancellor with his own hands stretched the rack on which the unfortunate woman was bound, in the hope of extracting a confession. It must, however, be admitted that Wriothesley's heart was not entirely impervious to emotion, for when, as Lord Chancellor, he announced the death of Henry VIII. in the House of Lords, he could not refrain from bursting into tears.

[160]He was, however, an able lawyer, and reserved his orgies for private life. "If my Lord Jefferies exceeded the bounds of temperance now and then in an evening, it does not follow that he was drunk on the bench or in council." (Campbell's "Lives," vol. iii. p. 595note.)

[161]Roger North's "Life of Lord Guilford," vol. ii. p. 167. (The wordroiled, so we are informed, was an import from the American plantations.)

[162]"If we wish to be in a state of security," he said, in 1859, "if we wish to maintain our great interests, if we wish to maintain our honour, it is necessary that we should have a power measured by that of any two possible adversaries."

[163]H. Crabb Robinson's "Diary," vol. iii. p. 453.

[164]"Commentaries," vol. iii. p. 47.

[165]Sir Robert Harley, Chancellor in 1757, was not made a peer until 1764. In 1830, Brougham took his seat on the Woolsack as a Commoner, and at least one other Chancellor has since followed his example.

[166]Roscoe's "Eminent British Lawyers," p. 258. Other Chancellors were sprung from equally humble origin. Edward Sugden, afterwards Lord St. Leonards, was the son of a barber. To him is attributed a repartee similar to that made many years earlier by Colonel Birch, M.P., who was taunted with having in his youth been a carrier. "It is true, as the gentleman says, I once was a carrier," replied Birch. "But let me tell the gentleman that it is very fortunate for him that he never was a carrier; for, if he had been, he would be a carrier still." See Burnet's "History of His Own Time," p. 259.

[167]Hawkins's "Memoirs," vol. ii. p. 312.

[168]He declared, on a famous occasion, that his debt of gratitude to His Majesty was ample, for the many favours he had graciously conferred upon him, which, when he forgot, might his God forget him! Wilkes, who was present, muttered, "God forget you! He will see you d——d first!" while Burke remarked that to escape the memory of the Almighty would be the very best thing Thurlow could hope for.

[169]Page 430.

[170]Twiss's "Life of Eldon," vol. i. p. 214.

[171]Lord Ellenborough was once asked by his hostess after dinner to cease conversing with his host—a judge—and to give the ladies some conversation, as he had been talking law long enough. "Madam," he replied, "I beg your pardon; we have not been talking law, or anything like law. We have been talking of one of the decisions of Lord Loughborough."—Campbell's "Lives," vol. vi. p. 251.

[172]Bagehot's "Literary Studies," vol. i. p. 150.

[173]Like Lord Bacon, too, he compiled an indifferent "Anecdote Book." Bacon's "Collection of Apothegms," was supposed to have been taken down from his dictation all on "one rainy day," but neither the brevity of the time nor the inclemency of the weather is a sufficient excuse for so poor a production.

[174]These occasionally took the form of lampoons in verse, such as the following:—The Derivation of Chancellor"The Chancellor, so says Lord Coke,Histitlefrom Cancello took;And ev'ry cause before him triedIt was his duty todecide.Lord Eldon, hesitating ever,Takes it from Chanceler, towaver,And thinks, as this may bear him out,His bounden duty is todoubt."Pryme's "Recollections," p. 111.

[174]These occasionally took the form of lampoons in verse, such as the following:—

The Derivation of Chancellor"The Chancellor, so says Lord Coke,Histitlefrom Cancello took;And ev'ry cause before him triedIt was his duty todecide.Lord Eldon, hesitating ever,Takes it from Chanceler, towaver,And thinks, as this may bear him out,His bounden duty is todoubt."Pryme's "Recollections," p. 111.

[175]"There never was anything like the admiration excited by Brougham's speech. Lord Harrowby, G. Somerset, Mr. Montagu, and Granville told me it was in eloquence, ability, and judicious management beyond almost anything they ever heard."—Lady Granville's "Letters" (to Lady G. Morpeth, 5 October, 1820), vol. i. p. 181.

[176]The Duke of Wellington once chaffed Brougham, saying that he would only be known hereafter as the inventor of a carriage. The Chancellor retorted by remarking that the Duke would only be remembered as the inventor of a pair of boots. "D—— the boots!" said Wellington. "I had quite forgotten them; you have the best of it!"

[177]Russell's "Recollections," p. 138.

[178]Blackstone's "Commentaries," vol. iii. p. 47.

[179]Lord Eldon, who dearly loved a joke, wrote as follows to his friend, Dr. Fisher, of the Charter House, who had applied to him for a piece of preferment then vacant—"Dear Fisher,"I cannot, to-day, give you the preferment for which you ask."I remain, your sincere friend,"Eldon."Turn over."(On the other side of the page he added)"I gave it to you yesterday.""Life of Eldon," vol. ii. p. 612.

[179]Lord Eldon, who dearly loved a joke, wrote as follows to his friend, Dr. Fisher, of the Charter House, who had applied to him for a piece of preferment then vacant—

"Dear Fisher,

"I cannot, to-day, give you the preferment for which you ask.

"I remain, your sincere friend,"Eldon."Turn over."

(On the other side of the page he added)"I gave it to you yesterday."

"Life of Eldon," vol. ii. p. 612.

[180]The same difficulty arose in 1878, when Queen Victoria solved it by following the precedent set in 1831, and divided the Seal between Lord Cairns and his predecessor.

[181]"The Runnymede Letters," p. 230.

[182]Hakewell gives a list of Hungerford's predecessors in the Chair, which includes Sir Peter de la Mare, commissioned by Parliament to rebuke Edward III. for his misconduct with Alice Perrers, and imprisoned for so doing.

[183]Phillips's "Curran and his Contemporaries," p. 88.

[184]July 16, 1610.

[185]Palgrave's "House of Commons," p. 51.

[186]"The Institutes of the Laws of England," fourth part (1648), p. 8.

[187]Carlyle's "Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell," vol. i. p. 88. Until comparatively recently it was not permissible for a Speaker to leave the Chair until, at the instigation of some member, the motion "that this House do now adjourn" had been put. In this connexion a pathetic story is told of Speaker Denison. On one occasion the House broke up rather hurriedly, and the necessary formula for releasing the Speaker was forgotten. He was consequently compelled to remain a lonely prisoner in the Chair until some good-natured member could be brought back to set him free.

[188]After his dismissal from the House of Commons, Sir John Trevor lived quietly at home and amassed money. His miserly habits became notorious. Once when he was dining alone and drinking a bottle of wine, a cousin was introduced by a side door. "You rascal," said Trevor to his servant; "how dare you bring this gentleman up the back stairs? Take him instantly down the back stairs and bring him up thefrontstairs!" In vain did the cousin remonstrate. While he was being ceremoniously conveyed down one staircase and up the other his host cleared the dinner table, and he returned to find the bottles and glasses replaced by books and papers. Campbell's "Lives of the Chancellors," vol. v. pp. 59-60.

[189]Sir Arnold Savage, Speaker in Henry VI.'s time, was so voluble, and addressed the King so often, and at such length, that the latter's patience became exhausted, and he asked that all requests from the Commons might hereafter be addressed to him in writing.

[190]In 1818, on the election of Manners Sutton.

[191]Dr. Johnson's "Debates in Parliament," vol. ii. p. 2.

[192]Of his nominee for the Speakership Lord John declared that he had "parts, temper, and constitution." "And he has," he added, "besides the principle of common honesty, which would prevent him from doing wrong, a principle of nice honour, which will always urge him to do right. By honour I do not mean a fashionable mistaken principle, which would only lead a man to court popular reputation, and avoid popular disgrace, whether the opinion on which they are founded is false or true; whether the conduct which they require is in itself just or unjust, or its consequences hurtful or beneficial to mankind. I mean a quality which is not satisfied with doing right, when it is merely the alternative of doing wrong, which prompts a man to do what he might lawfully and honestly leave undone; which distinguishes a thousand different shades in what is generally denominated the same colour, and is as much superior to a mere conformity to prescribed rules as forgiving a debt is to paying what we owe." "Parliamentary History," vol. xvi. p. 737.

[193]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 449.

[194]"The Rolliad."

[195]Horace Walpole's "Letters," vol. vii. p. 340. (This Speaker's criticism of the royal expenditure on a later occasion roused the animosity of George III., and cost him the loss of the Chair.)

[196]May's "Constitutional History," vol. i. p. 503 n.

[197]"People say, when you get on the blind side of a man, you get into his favour; but it is quite the reverse with the members when they get on the blind side of the Speaker." Pearson's "Political Dictionary," p. 53.

[198]When Trevor was Master of the Rolls, a post he combined with that of Speaker, it was said that if Justice were blind, Equity was now seen to squint!

[199]Barnes's "Political Portraits," p. 218.

[200]None of these chairs is to be found at Clandon, nor has the Onslow family any record of their existence, so perhaps the story of this particular perquisite is nothing but a legend and a myth.

[201]Pellew's "Life of Sidmouth," vol. i. p. 368.

[202]"Diary of Lord Colchester," February 2, 1796.

[203]Dalling's "Historical Characters," vol. ii. p. 181.

[204]Townsend's "History of the House of Commons."

[205]"Croker Papers," vol. ii. p. 164.

[206]Pellew's "Life of Sidmouth," vol. i. p. 66.

[207]"Ceremony," says Selden, "keeps up all things; 'tis like a penny glass to a rich spirit, or some excellent water; without it the water will be spilt, the spirit lost."

[208]They even carry lighted lanterns, though the whole place is ablaze with electric light!

[209]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 630.

[210]Sir George de Lacy Evans (1787-1870) was the last member honoured by being allowed to retain the seat in which he had received his vote of thanks.

[211]Grant's "Random Recollections," p. 7.

[212]"Hudibras," vol. i. p. 120. During the first years of the Long Parliament Elsynge brought so much distinction to the position that his authority was said to be greater than that of the Speaker (Lenthall). His abilities, "especially in taking and expressing the sense of the House," became so conspicuous that "more reverence was paid to his stool than to the Speaker's chair."—Wood's "Athenæ Oxonienses," vol. iii. p. 363.

[213]Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 251 n.

[214]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 688.

[215]"Modus Tenendi Parliamentum," p. 46.

[216]Torrens' "Life of Graham," vol. ii. p. 30.

[217]Elsynge's "Parliaments of England," pp. 160 and 161.

[218]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 549.

[219]Townsend's "History of the House of Commons", vol. i. p. 228.

[220]"The Order for Proceeding to the Parliament" (from the MS. at the College of Arms).

[221]For a particularly servile speech of this kind see "The Sovereign's Prerogative," p. 7.

[222]"Observations, Rules and Orders collected out of Divers Journals of the House of Commons," p. 25.

[223]A peer in support contended that otherwise a Jew might become Lord Chancellor. "Why not?" asked Lord Lyndhurst, in an undertone. "Daniel would have made a very good one!" (Atlay's "Victorian Chancellors," vol. i. p. 61.)

[224]Failure to take the oath only prevents a member from sitting within the Bar, voting in divisions, and taking part in debate. It does not disqualify him from the other privileges of membership, nor does it render his seat vacant.

[225]In 1792 a sample dagger was sent from France to a Birmingham firm, who were asked to make 3000 more of similar pattern. They thought the order suspicious, and consulted the Secretary of State. Burke happened to call at the latter's office, saw the dagger there, and borrowed it. During the Second Reading of the Aliens Bill he hurled this weapon on to the floor of the House, exclaiming, "Let us keep French principles from our heads, and French daggers from our hearts!" The Commons were not impressed, and only laughed, while Sheridan whispered to a neighbour, "The gentleman has brought us the knife, but where is the fork?" Another attempt at dramatic effect, equally unsuccessful, occurred on the second reading of the Reform Bill in 1831. Lord Brougham spoke for four hours, fortified by frequent draughts of mulled port. At the end he exclaimed, "By all the ties that bind every one of us to our common order and our common country, I solemnly adjure you—yea, on my bended knees, I supplicate you—reject not this Bill!" With these words he fell upon his knees, and remained in this attitude so long that his friends, fearing that he was suffering as much from mulled port as emotion, picked him up and replaced him on the Woolsack.

[226]Bradlaugh is not the only politician who has failed to interpret the words of the Oath in too literal a sense. Walpole became possessed of some treasonable letters written by William Shippen, a Jacobite and violent opponent of his. Walpole sent for Shippen, and burnt the incriminating papers in his presence. Later on, when Shippen was taking the oath of allegiance in the Commons, Walpole, who stood near and knew the other's principles to be as treasonable as ever, smiled. "Egad! Robin," said Shippen, "that's hardly fair!"

[227]Hatsell adds that it was contrary to custom for members so introduced to appear in top-boots. Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 85.

[228]Peeresses cannot claim the right to be present, but are allowed to attend in accordance with a privilege of long standing, which adds much to the beauty of the ceremony. Judges have always enjoyed the right of attendance. In old days they took a prominent part in the public business of the House, but were not regular members, and, though they gave their legal opinions upon constitutional questions before Parliament, could neither vote nor join in debate.

[229]If Parliament is opened by Commission, Black Rod is sent todesire(not tocommand) the attendance of the Commons, and the King's Speech is read by the Lord Chancellor.

[230]O'Connell's "Experiences," vol. i. p. 9.

[231]Hatsell says that such expressions were "very opprobrious," and might not unfitly have been applied "to the Peasants of France or the Boores of Germany." "Precedents," vol. i. p. 237.

[232]In 1860 such occurrences were prevented by the seats being balloted for by the Commons. "The faithful Commons being elected by ballot," as we read in "The Times" of January 25, "not now as formerly rushing in like the gods in the gallery on Boxing Night; on the contrary, they came steadily up to the Bar, the Speaker leading, and on his right Lord Palmerston." Today the system of balloting is again employed, and a much larger space both on the ground and in the galleries is allotted to the Commons.

[233]The Cockpit was pulled down in 1733, but the name continued to be given to the Treasury meeting-room. See Dodington's "Diary": "Went to the Cockpit to a prize cause," p. 72 (1828).

[234]"November 20, 1798. Called on Sir Francis Burdett, who had just been reading in the newspaper the King's intended Speech to-day (which for some sessions past has been published the morning before it is spoken)." Holcroft's "Memoirs," p. 229.

[235]It was burnt by the hangman in Palace Yard. Waldegrave's "Memoirs," p. 89.

[236]Twiss's "Life of Eldon," vol. ii. p. 359.

[237]O'Flanagan's "Lives of the Irish Chancellors," vol. ii. p. 541. (The same simile was used by Boswell. See Croker's "Dr. Johnson," vol. iii. p. 41.)

[238]Forster's "Sir John Eliot," vol. i. p. 405.

[239]Select Committees met in 1837, 1848, 1854, 1861 and 1871, and a Joint Committee of both Houses considered the question in 1869.

[240]Pryme's "Recollections," p. 220.

[241]Scobell's "Rules and Customs of Parliament," p. 19.

[242]"Orders, Proceedings, Punishments, and Privileges," etc. ("Harleian Miscellany," vol. v. p. 259.)

[243]Forster's "Grand Remonstrance," p. 206 n.

[244]Torrens' "Life of Melbourne," vol. ii. p. 375.

[245]Grant's "Recollections of the House of Lords," p. 407. Lord Alvanley was the sporting peer who out hunting met a well-known West End artist in pastry who was having some trouble with his horse. "I can't hold him," said the confectioner, "he's so devilish hot!" "Why don't you ice him, Mr. Gunter?" said Lord Alvanley.—(Maddyn's "Chiefs of States," vol. ii. p. 214.)

[246]Harford's "Recollections of Wilberforce," p. 93. An exception to this rule was made on November 4, 1909, when, in accordance with the general wish of the House, the Speaker permitted the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition to speak, although both had already joined in the debate on the previous night.

[247]Sir Wilfred Lawson was once sarcastically referred to as "the honourable and amusing baronet" (See "Men and Manners," p. 152.)

[248]"Orders, Proceedings, Punishments, and Privileges of the Commons" ("Harleian Miscellany," vol. v. p. 8).

[249]"The House has a character of its own. Like all great public collections of men, it possesses a marked love of virtue and an abhorrence of vice. But among vices there is none which the House abhors in the same degree withobstinacy" ("Works and Correspondence," vol. iii. p. 215).

[250]The last instance of this occurred on May 6, 1884, when Lord Waveney was addressing the House.

[251]"I must say that it (the House of Commons) would be a better machine if men were a little less vain, and would adopt a policy of silence. If they would be anxious to get through the business of the House without so much anxiety for self-exhibition as I have sometimes observed, I think the House of Commons might do a good deal more work, and very much better work than it does at present."—Speech at the Fishmongers' Hall, April 27, 1881.

[252]Grant's "Recollections," p. 53. Nowadays no member can make this motion more than once.

[253]Molesworth's "History of the Reform Bill," p. 214.

[254]See "Influence of Authority in Matters of Opinion," p. 219.

[255]With regard to those well-worn expressions, the "sense" of the House and the "feeling" of the House, it has been stated that the House of Commons has more sense and feeling than any one who sits upon its benches: "The collective wisdom of Parliament exceeds the wisdom of any single head therein."

[256]Pike's "Constitutional History," p. 267.

[257]Peeresses may also claim this as a right.

[258]Townsend's "History," vol. i. p. 253.

[259]Raikes's "Journal," vol. i. p. 320.

[260]"Table Talk," p. 109.

[261]Hatsell's "Precedents," vol. ii. p. 241 n.

[262]Lord Russell's "Essays and Sketches," p. 346.

[263]Oldfield's "History of the House of Commons," vol. i. p. 420.

[264]"Diary and Letters of Mme. D'Arblay," vol. iv.

[265]D'Ewes' "Journal," p. 341.

[266]Ward was expelled for forgery. He is referred to in Pope's "Dunciad"—"As thick as eggs at Ward in pillory."—Book iii. line 34.

[266]Ward was expelled for forgery. He is referred to in Pope's "Dunciad"—

"As thick as eggs at Ward in pillory."—Book iii. line 34.

[267]"Lex Parliamentaria," pp. 94, 101.

[268]Sir Walter had lodged information of scandalous words spoken by certain individuals. See Lister's "Life of Clarendon," vol. iii. p. 125.

[269]Petyt's "Miscellanea Parliamentaria," p. 64.

[270]In bygone days his duties evidently entailed much pedestrian exercise, as may be gathered from an Order of the House issued in Queen Elizabeth's time. "Upon Motion of the House" (say the records), "in regard to the Infirmity and Pains in the Sergeant's Feet, he is licensed by the House to ride a Footcloth Nag." "Observations, Rules, and Orders Collected out of Divers Journals of the House of Commons" (1717), p. 138.

[271]"Rot. Parl;" vol. v. 239-240.

[272]Cockburn's "Life of Jeffrey," vol. ii. p. 354.

[273]Nicholas's "Proceedings of the Privy Council," vol. vi. p. lxv.

[274]"Modus Tenendi Parliamentum," p. 28.

[275]"Brief Register of Parliamentary Writs," p. 672.

[276]Forster's "Grand Remonstrance," p. 316 n.

[277]Townsend's "History," vol. iii. p. 377.

Back to Index Next