His house of kings, with gold-bound brows, and sceptres in their hands, withtwo-foldballs and sceptres in their hands—are here filling the stage, and claiming it to the crack of doom; and now he 'smiles,' hesmilesupon his baffled foe, 'and points at them for HIS.'
The whole difficulty of this great Elizabethan position, and the moral of it, is most carefully and elaborately exhibited here. No plea at the bar was ever more finely and eloquently laboured. It was for the bar of 'foreign nations and future ages' that this defence was prepared: the speaker who speaks so 'pressly,' is the lawyer; and there is nothing left unsaid at last. But it is not exhibited in words merely. It is acted. It is brought out dramatically. It is presented to the eye as well as to the ear. The impossibility of any other mode of proceeding under those conditions is not demonstrated in this instance by a diagram, drawn on a piece of paper, and handed about among the jury; it is not an exact drawing of the street, and the house, and the corner where the difficulty occurred, with the number of yards and feet put down in ink or pencil marks; it is something much more lively and tangible than that which we have here, under pardon of this old Roman myth.
For the story, as to this element of it, is indeed not new. The story of the struggle of the few with the many, of the one with the many, of the one with 'the many-headed,' is indeed an old one. Back into the days of demi-gods and gods it takes us. It is the story of the celestial Titan, with his benefactions for men, and force and strength, with art to aid them—reluctant art—compelled to serve their ends, enringing his limbs, and driving hard the stakes. Here, indeed, in the Fable, in the proper hero of it, it is the struggle of the 'partliness' of pride and selfish ambition, lifting itself up in the place of God, and arraying itself against the common-weal, as well as the common-will; but the physical relation of the one to the many, the position of the individual who differs from his time on radical questions, the relative strength of the parties to this war, and the weapons and the mode of warfare inevitably prescribed to the minority under such conditions—all this is carefully brought out from the speciality of this instance, and presented in its most general form; and the application of the result to the position of the man who contendsforthe common-weal, against the selfish will, and passion, and narrowness, and short-sightedness of the multitude, is distinctly made.
Yes, the Elizabethan part is here; that all-unappreciated and odious part, which the great men of the Elizabethan time found forced upon them; that most odious part of all, which, the greatest of his time found forced uponhimas the condition of his greatness. It is here already, negatively defined, in this passionate defiance, which rings out at last in the Roman street, when the hero's pride bursts through his resolve, when he breaks down at last in his studied part, and all considerations of policy, all regard to that which was dearer to him than 'hissingle mould,' is given to the winds in the tempest of his wrath, and he stands at bay, and confrontsalone'the beast with many heads.'
It is thus that he measures the man he contends with, the antagonist who is but 'the horn and noise of the monster':—
'Thou injurious TRIBUNE!Within thine eyes sattwenty thousanddeaths,In thy hands clenchedas many millions, inThy lying tongueboth numbers, I would say,Thou liest, unto thee, with voice as freeAs I do pray the gods.'
But there was a heroism of a finer strain than that at work in England then, imitating the graces of the gods to better purpose; a heroism which must fight a harder field than that, which must fight its own great battles through alone, without acclamations, without spectators; which must come off victorious, and never count its 'cicatrices,' or claim 'the war's garland.'
If we would know the secret of those struggles, those hard conflicts that were going on here then, in whose results all the future ages of mankind were concerned, we must penetrate with this Poet the secret of the Roman patrician's house; we must listen, through that thin poetic barrier, to the great chief himself, the chief of the unborn age of a new civilization—the leader, and hero, and conqueror of the ages of Peace—as he enters and paces his own hall, with the angry fire in his eyes, and utters there the words for which there is no utterance without—as he listens there anew to the argument of that for which he lives, and seeks to reconcile himself anew to that baseness which his time demands of him.
We must seek, here, not the part of him only who endured long and much, but was, at last, provoked into a premature boldness, and involved in a fatal collision with the state, but that of him who endured to the end, who played his life-long part without self-betrayal. We must seek, here, not the part of the great martial chieftain only, but the part of that heroic chief and leader of men and ages, who discovered, in the sixteenth century, when the chivalry of the sword was still exalting its standard of honour as supreme, when the law of the sword was still the world's law, that brute instinct was not the true valour, that there was a better part of it than instinct, though he knows and confesses,—though he is the first to discover, that instinct is a great matter. We must seek, here,the words, the very words of that part which we shall findactedelsewhere,—the part of the chief who was determined, for his part, 'to live and fight another day,' who was not willing to spend _him_self in such conflicts as those in which he saw his most illustrious contemporaries perish at his side, on his right hand and on his left, in the reign of the Tudor, and in the reign of the Stuart. And he has not been at all sparing of his hints on this subject over his own name, for those who have leisure to take them.
'The moral of this fable is,' he says, commenting in a certain place, on the wisdom ofthe Ancients, 'that men should not be confident of themselves, and imagine that a discovery of their excellences will always render them acceptable.For this can only succeedaccording tothe natureandmannersof the person theycourt orsolicit, who, if he be a man not of the same gifts and endowments, but altogether of a haughty and insolent behaviour—(hererepresented bythe person of Juno)—they must entirely drop the characterthat carries the least show of worth or gracefulness; if they proceed uponany otherfooting it isdownright folly. Noris it sufficient toactthe deformity ofobsequiousness, unless theyreally change themselves, andbecomeabject and contemptiblein their persons.' This was a time when abject and contemptiblepersonscould do what others could not do. Large enterprises, new developments of art and science, the most radical social innovations, were undertaken and managed, and very successfully, too, in that age, by persons of that description, though not without frequent glances on their part, at that little, apparently somewhat contradictory circumstance, in their history.
But the fables in which the wisdom of the Moderns, and the secrets oftheirsages are lodged, are the fables we are unlocking here. Let us listen to these 'secrets of policy' for ourselves, and not take them on trust any longer.
A room in Coriolanus's house.
[Enter Coriolanus and Patricians.]
Cor. Let thempull all about mine ears, present meDeath on the wheel, or at wild horses' heels, Or pile ten hills on the Tarpeian rock That the precipitation might down stretch Below the beam of sight, yet will I stillBe thus to them.
[Under certain conditions that is heroism, no doubt.]
First Patrician. You do the nobler.
[For the question is of NOBILITY.]
Cor. I muse my mother Does not approve me further. I talk ofyou. [To Volumnia.] Why did you wish me milder? Would you have meFalse to my nature? Rather sayI play The man I am.
Vol. O sir, sir, sir,Iwould have had you put your power well onBefore you had worn it out.Lesser had beenThe thwarting of your dispositions, ifYou hadnot show'd them how you were disposed,Ere they lacked power to cross you.
* * * * *
[Enter Menenius and Senators.]
Men. Come, come, you have been too roughSomething too rough;You must return, and mend it.
1 Sen.There's no remedy,Unless, bynotso doing,our good cityCleave in the midst and perish.
Vol. Pray be counselled:Ihave aheartas little apt as yours But yeta brain[hear] that leads my use of anger To bettervantage.
Men. Well said,noblewoman;Before he should thus stoop to theherd, but that The VIOLENT PIT O' THE TIME,craves it asPHYSIC For the WHOLE STATE,Iwould putminearmour on, Which I can scarcely bear.
[It is the diseased common-weal whose case this Doctor is undertaking.Thatis our subject.]
Cor. What must I do?
Men. Return to the Tribunes.
Cor. Well, What then? what then?
Men. Repent what you have spoke.
Cor. For them? Ican not do it to the gods: Must I then do't tothem?
Vol. You are tooabsolute;Thoughtherein you can never betoo noble But when extremities speak. I have heard you say, HONORandPOLICY [hear] like unsevered friendsI' the wardo grow together:Grant that, and tell me. In peace, whateachof them by the other loses That they combine not there?
Cor. Tush; tush!
Men.A good demand.
Vol. Ifit be honor, in your wars, to seem The same you are not, (which FOR YOUR BEST ENDSYou adopt your policy), how is itless, orworseThat it shall hold companionship in peace With honor, as in war;since that to both It stands in like request?
Cor. Whyforce you this? [Truly.]
Vol.Becausethatnow, IT LIES ON YOU to speakTo the people, notbyyour own instruction, Nor by thematter which your heart prompts youto, But with such words that are but ratedinYour tonguethough but bastards and syllablesOf noallowance, toyour bosom's truth. Now this no more dishonors you at all, Than to take ina townwithgentle words, Which else would put you to your fortune, and THE HAZARD of MUCH BLOOD.—[Hear.] I would dissemblewith my nature, whereMy fortune and my friends at stakerequiredI should do so in honor.I amin this; Your wife, your son, these senators, the nobles, And you will rather show ourgeneral lowtsHow you can frown, than spend afawnupon them. For theinheritanceof their loves, andsafe-guardOfwhat that want might ruin[hear] NOBLE lady!
Come go with us. Speak fair: you may salve so,
[It is the diseased common-weal we talk of still.]
You may salve so,
Not what is dangerous present,butthelossOf what is past.
[That was this Doctor's method, who was a Doctor of Lawsas well as Medicine, and very skilful in medicines 'palliative'as well as 'alterative.']
Vol. I pry'thee now, my son,Go to them with this bonnet in thy hand,And thus far having stretched it (herebe with them),Thyknee bussing the stones, for in such businessActionis eloquence, and theeyesofthe ignorantMorelearnedthan theears—waving thy head,Which often thus, correcting thy stout heart,Now humble as the ripest mulberryThat will not hold the handling: or say to them:Thou arttheirsoldier, andbeing bred in broils,Hast not the soft way, which thou dost confessWere fit for thee to use, asthey to claim,In askingtheir goodloves; but thou wilt frameThyselfforsooth hereafter theirs, so farAs thou hast power and person.
Pry'thee nowGo and be ruled: although I knowthou hadst ratherFollow thine enemy in a fiery gulfThan flatter him in a bower. Here is Cominius.
[Enter Cominius.]
Com. I have been i' the market-place, and, sir,'tis fitYou make STRONG PARTY,ordefend yourselfBy CALMNESS, or by ABSENCE. ALL's in anger.
Men. Only fair speech.I think 'twill serve, if heCan thereto frame his spirit.
Vol. He must, and will.Pry'thee nowsayyou willand go about it.
Cor. Must I go show them my unbarbed sconce?Must IWithmy base tongue, give to my noble heartA lie that it must bear? Well, I will do't:Yet were there but this single plot to lose,This mould of Marcius, they, to dust should grind it,And throw it against the wind;—to the market-place;You have put me now to such a part, which neverIshall dischargeto the life.
Com. Come, come, we'll prompt you.
Vol. I pry'thee now, sweet son, as thou hast said,Mypraises made thee first a soldier [—Volumnia—], so To have my praise for this,perform a part Than hast not done before.
Cor. Well, I must do't.Away my disposition, and possess meSome harlot's spirit!My throatofwarbe turned,Which quired with mydruminto a pipe!Small as an eunuch's or the virgin voiceThat babies lulls asleep! The smiles ofknavesTent in my cheeks; and school-boy's tears take upThe glasses of my sight! A beggar's tongueMakemotion through my lips; and myarm'd kneesWho bowed but in my stirrup, bend like hisThathath received an alms. I will not do't,Lest Isurceasetohonor mine own truth,Andby my body's action teach my mindA mostinherent baseness.
Vol. At thy choice, then;To beg of thee, it is my more dishonorThan thou of them. Comeall to ruin; letThy motherratherfeel thy pride, than fearThy dangerous stoutness, forImock at deathWith as big a heart as thou. Do as thou list.Thyvaliantness was mine, thou suck'dst it from me,Butowe thy pride thyself.
Cor. Pray be content.MotherIam going to the market place, Chide me no more. I'llmountebank their loves, Cog their hearts from them,and come back belovedOf all the trades in Rome.—[That he will—] Look I am going. Commend me to my wife. I'll return Consul [—That he will—] Or never trust to what my tongue can do,I' the way of flattery further.
Vol. Do your will. [Exit.]
Com. Away, the tribunes do attend you:arm yourselfTo answermildly; for they are preparedWith accusations as I hear more strongThan are upon you yet.
Cor.The word is mildly: Pray you let us go,Let them accuse me byinvention, IWill answer in mine honor.
Men.Ay, but mildly.
Cor. Well, mildly be it then, mildly.
[The Forum. Enter Coriolanus and his party.]
Tribune. Well, here he comes.
Men.Calmly, I do beseech you.
Cor. Ay, as an ostler, that for the poorest pieceWill bear the knave by the volume.The honoured godsKeep Rome in safety, and the CHAIRS ofjusticeSupplied with WORTHY MEN;plantLOVE among us.ThrongOUR LARGE TEMPLESwith the showsof PEACE,AndNOTourSTREETSwithWAR.
Sen. AMEN! AMEN!
Men. A NOBLE wish.
Thus far the Poet: but the mask through which he speaks is wanted for other purposes, for these occasional auto-biographical glimpses are but the side play of the great historical exhibition which is in progress here, and are introduced in entire subordination to its requisitions.
It is, indeed, an old story into which all this Elizabethan history is crowded. That mimic scene in which the great historic instances in the science of human nature and human life were brought out with such scientific accuracy, and with such matchless artistic power and splendour, was, in fact, what the Poet himself, who ought to know, tells us it is; with so much emphasis,—not merely the mirror of nature in general, but the daguerreotype of the then yet living age, the plate which was able to give to the verybodyof it, itsform and pressure. That is what it was. And what is more, it was the only Mirror, the only Spectator, the only Times, in which the times could get reflected and deliberated on then, with any degree of freedom and vivacity. And yet there were minds here in England then, as acute, as reflective, as able to lead the popular mind as those that compose our leaders and reviews today. There was a mind here then, reflecting not 'ages past' only, but one that had taken its knowledge of the past from the present, that found 'in all men's lives,' a history figuring the nature of the times deceased; prophetic also: and this was the mind of the one who writes 'spirits are not finely touched but to fine issues.'
They had to take old stories,—these sly, ambitious aspirants to power, who were not disposed to give up their natural right to dictate, for the lack of an organ, or because they found the proper insignia of their office usurped: it was necessary that they should take old stories, or invent new ones, 'to make those slights upon the banks of Thames, that so did take' not 'Eliza and our James' only, but that people of whom 'Eliza and our James' were only 'the outstretched shadows,' 'the monster,' of whose 'noise' these sovereigns, as the author of this play took it, were 'but the horn.'
They had to take old stories of one kind and another, as they happened to find them, and vamp them up to suit their purposes; stories, old or new, they did not much care which.
Old and memorable ones, so memorable that the world herself with her great faculty of oblivion, could not forget them, but carried them in her mind from age to age,—stories so memorable that all men knew them by heart,—so the author could find one to his purpose,—were best for some things,—for many things; but for others new ones must be invented; and certainly there would be no difficulty as to that, for lack of gifts at least, in the mind whence these old ones were coming out so freshly, in the gloss of their new-coined immortality.
It is, indeed, an old story that we have here, a story of that ancient Rome, whose 'just, free and flourishing state,' the author of this new science of policy confesses himself,—under hisuniversalname,—so childishly enamoured of, that he interests himself in it to a degree of passion, though he 'neither loves it in itsbirthor itsdecline,'—[under its kings or its emperors.]—It is a story ofRepublicanRome, and the difference, the radical difference, between the civil magistracy which represented the Roman people, and that unconstitutional popular power which the popular tyranny creates, is by no means omitted in the exposition. That difference, indeed, is that which makes the representation possible; it is brought out and insisted on, 'theychoose their officers;' it is a difference which is made much of, for it contains one of the radical points in the poetic intention.
But without going into the argument, the large and comprehensive argument, of this most rich and grave and splendid composition, crowded from the first line of it to the last, with the results of a political learning which has no match in letters, which had none then, which has none now; no, or the world would be in another case than it is, for it is a political learning which has its roots in the new philosophy, it is grounded in the philosophy of the nature of things, it is radical as thePrima Philosophia,—without attempting to exhaust the meaning of a work embodying through all its unsurpassed vigor and vivacity of poetic representation, the new philosophic statesman's ripest lore, the patient fruits of 'observation strange,'—without going into his argument of the whole, the reader who merely wishes to see for himself, at a glance, in a word, as a matter of curiosity merely; whether the view here given of the political sagacity and prescience of the Elizabethan Man of Letters, is in the least chargeable with exaggeration, has only to look at the context of that revolutionary speech and proposal, that revolutionary burst of eloquence which has been here claimed as a proper historical issue of the age of Elizabeth. He will not have to read very far to satisfy himself as to that. It will be necessary, indeed, for that purpose, that he should have eyes in his head, eyes not purely idiotic, but with the ordinary amount of human speculation in them, and, moreover, it will be necessary that he should use them,—as eyes are ordinarily used in such cases,—nothing more. But unfortunately this is just the kind of scrutiny which nobody has been able to bestow on this work hitherto, on account of those historical obstructions with which, at the time it was written, it was found necessary to guard such discussions, discussions running into such delicate questions in a manner so essentially incomparably free.
For, in fact, there is no plainer piece of English extant, when one comes to look at it. All that has been claimed in the Historical part of this work, [not published in this volume] may be found here without any research, on the mere surface of the dialogue. Looking at it never so obliquely, with never so small a fraction of an eye, one cannot help seeing it.
The reader who would possess himself of the utmost meaning of these passages, one who would comprehend their farthest reaches, must indeed be content to wait until he can carry with him into all the parts that knowledge of the authors general intention in this work, which only a most thorough and careful study of it will yield.
It is, indeed, a work in which the whole question of government is seized at its source—one in which the whole difficulty of it is grappled with unflinching courage and veracity. It is a work in which that question of classes in the state, which lies on the surface of it, is treated in a general, and not exclusive manner; or, where the treatment is narrowed and pointed, as it is throughout in the running commentary, it is narrowed and pointed to the question of the then yet living age, and to those momentous developments of it which, 'in their weak beginnings,' the philosophic eye had detected, and not to a state of things which had to cease before the first Punic war could be begun.
The question ofclasses, and their respective claims in governments, is indeed incidentally treated here, but in this author's own distinctive manner, which is one that is sure to take out, always—even in his lightest, most sportive handling—the heart of his subject, so as to leave little else but gleanings to the author who follows in that track hereafter.
For this is one of those unsurpassably daring productions of the Elizabethan Muse, which, after long experiment, encouraged by that protracted immunity from suspicion, and stimulated by the hurrying on of the great crisis, it threw out at last in the face and eyes of tyranny, Things which are but intimated in the earlier plays— political allusions, which are brought out there amid crackling volleys of conceits, under cover of a battery of quips and jests— political doctrines, which lie there wrapped in thickest involutions of philosophic subtleties, are all unlocked and open here on the surface: he that runs may take them if he will.
'Would you proceedespeciallyagainstCaiusMARCIUS?''Against him FIRST: He's avery dogto THE COMMONALTY.'
In this exhibition of the social orders to which human society instinctively tends, and that so-calledstateinto which human combinations in barbaric ages rudely settles, theprincipleof the combination—the principle of gradation, and subjection, and permanence—is called in question, and exposed as a purely instinctive principle, as, in fact, only a principle of revolution disguised; and a higher one, the distinctively human element, the principle of KIND, is now, for the first time, demanded on scientific grounds, as the essential principle of any permanent human combination—as the natural principle, the only one which the science of nature can recognise as a principle of STATE.
It is the PEACE principle which this great scientific war-hater and captain of the ages of peace is in search of, with his neworganum; though he is philosopher enough to know that, in diseased states, wars are nature's own rude remedies, her barbarous surgery, for evils yet more unendurable. He has found himself chosen a justice of the peace—the world's peace; and it is the principle of permanence, of law and subjection—in a word, it is the principle ofstate, as opposed to revolution and dissolution—which he is judging of in behalf of his kind. And he makes a business of it. He goes about in his own fashion. He gets up this great war-piece on purpose to find it.
He has got a state on his stage, which is ceasing to be astateat the moment in which he shows it to us; a state which has the war principle—the principle of conquest within no longer working in it insidiously as government, but developed as war; for it has just overstepped the endurable point in its mastery. It is a revolution that is coming off when the curtain rises. For the government has been gnawing the Roman common-weal at home, with those same teeth it ravened the Volscians with abroad, till it has reached the vitals at last, and the common-weal has betaken itself to the Volscian's weapons:—the people have risen. They are all out when the play begins on an armed hunt for their rat-like, gnawing, corn-consuming rulers. They are determined to 'kill them,' and have 'corn at their own price.' 'If thewarseat us not,theywill,' is the word; 'and there's all THE LOVEtheybear us.' 'Romeandher ratsare at the point of battle,' cries the Poet. Theonesideshall have bale, is his prophecy. 'Withoutgood nature,' he says elsewhere, using the termgoodin its scientific sense, 'menare only a NOBLER kind of VERMIN'; and he makes a most unsparing application of this principle in his criticisms. Many a splendid historical figure is made to show its teeth, and rat-like mien and propensities, through all the splendour of its disguises, merely by the application of his simple philosophical tests. For the question, as he puts it, is the question between animal instinct, between mere appetite, and reason; and the question incidentally arises in the course of the exhibition, whether the common-weal, when it comes to anything like common-sense, is going to stand being gnawed in this way, for the benefit of any individual, or clique, or party.
For the ground on which the classes or estates, and their respective claims to the government, are tried here, is the ground of thecommon-weal; and the question as to the fitness of any existing class in the state for an exclusive, unlimited control of the welfare of the whole, is more than suggested. That which stops short of the weal of the whole for its end, is that which is under criticism here; and whether it exist in 'the one,' or 'the few,' or 'the many,'—and these are the terms that are employed here,—whether it exist in the civil magistracy, sustained by a popular submission, or in the power of the victorious military chief, at the head of his still extant and resistless armament, it is necessarily rejected as a principle of sovereignty and permanence, in this purely scientific view of the human conditions of it. It is a question which this author handles with a thorough impartiality, in all his political treatises, let them come in what name and form they will, with more or less clearness, indeed, as the circumstances seem to dictate.
Butnowhereis the whole history of the military government, collected from the obscurity of the past, and brought out with such inflexible design—with such vividness and strength of historic exhibition, as it ishere. It is traced to its beginnings in the distinctions which nature herself creates,—those physical, and moral, and intellectual distinctions, with which she crowns, in her happier moods, the large resplendent brows of her born kings and masters. It is traced from its origin in the crowning of the victorious chief on the field of battle, to the moment in which the sword of military conquest is turned back on the conquerors by the chief into whose hands they gave it; and the sword of conquest abroad becomes, at home, the sword of state.
Nay, this Play goes farther, and embraces the contingency of a foreign rule—one, too, in which theconquerortakes his surname from theconquest; it brings home 'the enemy of the whole state,' as a king, in triumph to the capital, whose streets he has filled with mourning; and though the author does not tell us in this case, at he does in another, that the nation was awed 'with an offertory of standards' in the temple, and that 'orisons and Te Deums were again sung,'—the victor 'not meaning that the peopleshould forgettoo soonthat he came in by battle'—points, not much short of that, in the way of speciality, are not wanting. More than one conqueror, indeed, looks out from this old chieftain's Roman casque. 'There is a little touch ofHarryin the scene'; and though the author goes out of his way to tell us that 'he must by no means say his hero iscovetous,' it will not be the Elizabethan Philosopher's fault, if we do not knowwhichHarry it is that says—
If you have writ your annals true,'tis there, That like an eagle in a dove-cote, I Flutter'd your Volsces in Corioli:Alone, I did it.
* * * * *
Auf. Read it, noble lords; But tellthe traitor, in thehighest degreeHe hath abused your powers.
Cor. Traitor!—How now?
Auf. Ay,traitor, Marcius.
Cor.Marcius!
Auf. AY,Marcius, CaiusMarcius; Dost thou think I'll grace thee with THAT ROBBERY,thySTOLEN NAME CORIOLANUS in CORIOLI?'—[the conqueror in the conquest.]
Never, indeed, was 'the garland of war,' whether glistening freshly on the hero's brow on the fresh battle-field, or whether glittering, transmuted into civic gold and gems, on the brow of his hereditary successor, subjected to such a searching process before, as that with which the Poet, under cover of anaristocrat'spretensions, and especially under cover of his pretensions to an elective magistracy, can venture to test it.
Thishero, who 'speaks of the people as if he were agodto punish, and not a man of their infirmity,' is on trial for that pretension from the first scene of this Play to the last. The author has, indeed, his own views of the fickle, ignorant, foolish multitude,—such views as any one, who had occasion to experiment on it personally, in the age of Elizabeth, would not lack the means of acquiring; and amidst those ebullitions of wrath, which he pours from his haughty hero's lips, one hears at times a tone that sounds a little like some other things from the same source, as if the author had himself, in some way, been brought to look at the subject from a point of observation, not altogether unlike that from which his hero speaks; or as if he might, at least, have known how to sympathise with the haughty and unbending nature, that had been brought into such deadly collision with it. But in the dramatic representation, though it is far from being a flattering one, we listen in vain for any echo of this sentiment. In its rich and kindly humour there is no sneer, no satire. It is the loving eye of nature's own great pupil—it is the kindly human eye, that comes near enough to point those jests, and paint so truly; there is a great human heart here in the scene embracing the lowly. It was the heart that was putting forth then its silent but resistless energies into the ages of the human advancement, to take up the despised and rejected masses of men from their misery, and make of them truly onekindand kindred.
And though he has had, indeed, his own private experiences with the multitude, and the passions are, as he intimates—at least as strong in him as in another, he has his own view, also, of the common pitifulness and weakness of the human conditions; and he has a view which is, in his time, all his own, of the instrumentalities that are needed to reach that level of human nature, and to lift men up from the mire of these conditions, from the wrong and wretchedness into which, in their unaided, unartistic, unlearned struggle with nature,—within and without,—the kindare fallen. And so strong in him is the sense of this pitifulness, that it predominates over the sharpness of his genius, and throws the divinest mists and veils of compassion over the harsh, scientific realities he is constrained to lay bare.
And, in fact, it takes this monstrous pretence, and claim tohuman leadership, which he finds passing unquestioned in his time, to bring him out on this point fairly. The statesmanship of the man who undertakes to make his own petty personality the measure of aworld, who would make, not that reason which is in usall, and embraces theworld, and which isnotpersonal,—not that conscience which is the sensibility to reason, and is as broad and impartial as that—which goes with the reason, and embraces, like that, without bias, the common weal,—but that which is particular, and private, and limited to the individual,—his senses,—his passions, his private affections,—his mere caprice,—his mere will; the motive of the public action;—the statesmanship of the man who dares to offer these to an insulted world, as reasons of state; who claims a divine prerogative to make his single will good against reason; who claims a divine right to make his private interest outweigh the weal of the whole; who asks men to obliterate, in their judgment, its essential principle, that which makes them men, the eternal principle of the whole;—this is the phenomenon which provokes at last, in this author, the philosophic ire. The moment this thing shows itself on his stage, he puts his pity to sleep. He will show up, at last, without any mercy, in a purely scientific manner, as we see more clearly elsewhere, the common pitifulness of the human conditions, in the person of him who claims exemption from them,—who speaks of the people as if he were a god to punish, and not a man of their infirmity.
'There is formed in every thing adouble nature';—this author, who is the philosopher ofnature, tells us on another page,—'there is formed inevery thinga double nature OF GOOD, the one as everything is a total or substantive in itself, the other as it is apartormemberof a greater body; whereof thelatteris in degree the greater and the worthier, because ittends to the conservation of a more general form. Therefore we see the iron inparticular sympathymoving to the loadstone; but yet, ifit exceed a certain quantity, it forsakes the affection to the loadstone, and, like a good patriot, moves to the earth. This double nature of good is MUCH MORE (hear)—muchmoreENGRAVEN on MAN, if he _de_GENERATE not—(decline not from the law of hiskind—for thatmoreis SPECIAL) unto whom the conservation of DUTY to the PUBLIC ought to be much morepreciousthan the conservation of life and being, according to that memorable speech of Pompey THE GREAT, [the truly great, for this is the question of greatness,] when BEING IN COMMISSION OF PURVEYANCE FOR A FAMINE AT ROME, and being dissuaded, with great vehemency and instance, by his friends about him, that he should not hazard himself to sea in an extremity of weather, answered, 'Necesse est ut eam, non ut vivam.'
But we happen to have set out here, in our play, at the very beginning of it, the specific case alluded to, in this general exhibition of the radical human law, viz., the case of a famine in Rome, which we shall find differently treated, in this instance, by the person who aspires to 'the helm o' the state.'
When the question is of the true nobility and greatness, of the true statesmanship, of the personal fitness of an individual to assume the care of the public welfare, the question, of course, as to this double nature, comes in. We wish to know—if any thing is going to depend upon his singlewillin the matter, we must know, which of these two natures is SOVEREIGN in himself,—which good he supremely affects,—that of his senses, passions, and private affections, that good which ends in his private and particular nature,—a good which has itsdueplace in this system, and is not unnaturally mortified and depressed, as it is in less scientific ones,—or that good of thewhole, which is each man's highest good;—whether he is, in fact, aman, or whether, in the absence of that perfection of the human form, which should be the end of science and government, he approximates at all,—or undertakes to approximate at all, to the true human type;—whether he be, indeed, a man, in the higher sense of that word, or whether he ranks in the scale of nature, as 'only anoblerkind of vermin,' aman, anoble man, a man with a divine ideal and ambition,degenerateinto that.
When it is a candidate for the chief magistracy, a candidate for the supreme power in the state, who is on his trial, of course that question as to the balance between the public and private affections, which, those who know how to trace this author's hand, know he is so fond of trying elsewhere, is sure to come up. The question is, as to whether there is any affection in this claimant for power, so large and so noble, that it can embrace heartily the common weal, and takethatto beitsgood. The trial will be a sharp one. The trial of human greatness which is magnanimity, must needs be. The question is, as to whether this is a nature capable of pursuing that end for its own sake, without respect to its pivate and merely selfish recompence; whether it is one which has any such means of egress from its particular self, any such means of coming out of its private and exclusive motivity, that it can persevere in its care of the Common Weal, through good and through ill report, through personal wrong and ingratitude,—abandoning its private claim, and ascending by that conquest to the divineness.
'What is granted them?''Five Tribunes to defend their vulgar wisdoms.'
'The rabble should have first unroofed the city,Ere so prevailed with me.'
The common people themselves have some inkling of this. This Roman who has established his claim to rule Romans at home, by killing Volscians abroad, appears to their simple apprehension, at the moment, at least, when they find themselves suffering the gnawings of hunger through his legislation, to have established but a questionable claim to their submission.
And before ever he shows his head on the stage, this question, which is the question of the play, is already started. For it is the people who are permitted to come on first of all and explain their wants, and discuss the military hero's qualifications for rule in that relation, and that, too, in a not altogether foolish manner. For though the author knows how to do justice to the simplicity of their politics, he knows how to do justice also to that practical determination and straightforwardness and largeness of sense, which even in the common sense of uneducated masses, is already struggling a little to declare itself.
They have one great piece of political learning which their lordly legislators lack, and for lack of sense and comprehension cannot have. They are learned in the doctrine of their own political and social want; they are full of the most accurate and vivid impressions on that subject. Their notions of it are altogether different from those vague general abstract conceptions of it, which the brains of their refined lordly rulers stoop to admit. The terms which that legislation deals with, are one thing in the patrician's vocabulary, and another and quite different thing in the plebeian's; hunger means one thing in the 'patrician's vocabulary,' and another and very different thing in the plebeian's. They know, too, 'that meat was made for mouths,' and 'that the gods sent not corn for the rich men only.' They are under the impression that there ought to be bread for them by some means or other, when the storehouses that their toil has filled are overflowing, and though they are not clear as to the process which should accomplish this result, they have come to the conclusion that there must be some error somewhere in the legislation of those learnedfew, to whom they have resigned the task of governing them. They are strongly of opinion that there must be some mistake in the calculations by which those venerable wise men andfathers, do so infallibly contrive to sweep the results of the poor man's toil and privation into their own garners,—calculations which enable the legislator to enjoy in lordly ease and splendour, the sight of the plebeian's misery, which enable him to lavish on his idlest whims, to give to his dogs that which would save lifetimes of unreckoned human misery. These are their views, and when the play begins, they have resolved themselves into a committee of the whole, and are out on a commission of inquiry and administrative reform, armed with bats and clubs and other weapons,—such as came first to hand, intending to make short work of it. This is their peace budget, and as to war, they have some rude notions on that subject, too;—some dim impression that nature intended them for some other ends than to be sold in the shambles, as the purchase of some lordly chieftain's title. There's an incipient statesmanship struggling there in that rude mass, though it does not as yet get fairly expressed. It will take the tribuneship and the refinements of the aristocratic leisure, to make the rude wisdom of want and toil eloquent. But it has found a tribune at last, who will be able to speak for it, through one mouth or another, scientifically and to the purpose too, ere all is done.
'Before we proceed any further,hear me speak,' he cries, through the Roman leader's lips; for his Rome, too, if it be not yet 'at the point of battle,' is drifting towards it rapidly, as he sees well enough when this speech begins.
But let us take the Play as we find it. Take the first scene of it. The stage is filled with the people,—not with their representatives, —but with the people themselves, in their own persons, in the act of taking the government into their own hands. They are hurrying sternly and silently through the city streets. There has been no practising of 'goose step,' to teach them that movement. They are armed with clubs, staves and other weapons, peace weapons, but there is an edge in them now, fine enough for their purpose. The word of the play is the word that arrests that movement. The voice of the leader rings out,—it is a HALT that is ordered.
'BEFORE WE PROCEED ANY FURTHER, HEAR ME SPEAK,' cries one from the mass.
'Speak! speak!' is the reply. They are ready to hear reason. They want a speaker. They want a voice, though never so rude, to put their stern inarticulate purpose 'into some frame.'
'You are all resolved rather TO DIE than TO FAMISH,' continues the first speaker. Yes, that is it precisely; he has spoken the word.
'RESOLVED! RESOLVED!' is the common response; for the revolutionary point is touched here.
'FIRST,you know, Caius Marcius is CHIEF ENEMY to the people'—a rude grasp at causes. This captain will establish a commonintelligencein his companybefore they proceed any further; that their acting may be one, and to purpose. For there is no command but that here.
Cit.We know't, we know't.
First Cit.Let uskill him, and we'll have corn at our own price. Is't a verdict?
_Cit. Nomore talking on't. Let it bone done: away, away.
'One word, good citizens,' cries another, 'who thinks that the thing will bear, perhaps, a little further discussion. And this is the hint for the first speaker to produce his cause more fully. 'GOOD CITIZENS,' is the word he takes up. "WeareaccountedPOOR CITIZENS; the patricians GOOD.' [That is the way the account stands, then.] 'What AUTHORITYsurfeitson would relieve us. If they would yield usbut the superfluitywhile it werewholesome, we might guess they relieved ushumanely; but they think we aretoo dear.' [They love us as we are too well. They want poor people to reflect their riches. It takes plebeians to make patricians; it takes our valleys to make their heights.]
'The leanness thatafflicts us, the object ofourmisery, is as aninventoryto particularizetheir abundance.Oursufferance is a gain tothem.—Let us revenge this with our pikes, ere we become rakes: for the gods know, I speak this inhungerfor bread, and not inthirstforrevenge.
Second Cit. Would you proceedespeciallyagainst Caius Marcius?
First Cit. Against himfirst;—he's avery dogto the commonalty.
Second Cit. Consider you whatserviceshe has done forhis country?
[That is one of the things which are about to be 'considered.']
First Cit. Very well, and could be content to give him good report for'it, but that hepays himselfwithbeing proud.
Second Cit. Nay, but speak not maliciously.
First Cit. I say unto you, what he hath done famously, hedid it to that end: though soft-conscienced men can be content to say it was for HIS COUNTRY, he did it toplease his mother, and to bepartlyproud; which he is, even to thealtitude of his virtue.
Second Cit. What hecannot helpIN HIS NATURE, you account avicein him. Youmust in no waysay he is covetous.
First Cit. If I must not, I need not be barren of accusations; he hath faults with surplus to tirein repetition. [Shouts within.] What shouts are these? The other side o' the city is risen. Why stay we prating here?To the Capitol!
Cit. Come, come.
First Cit. Soft; who comes here?
[Enter Menenius Agrippa.]
Second Cit. Worthy Menenius Agrippa, one that hath alwaysloved the people.
First Cit. He's onehonestenough [—honest—a great word in the Shakspere philosophy]; wouldall the restwere so.
[That is a good prayer when it comes to be understood.]
Men. What work's, my countrymen, in hand? Where go you, With bats and clubs? The matter? Speak, I pray you.
First Cit. Our business is not unknown toTHE SENATE [Hear]; they have hadinklingthis fortnight what we intend to do, which now we'll show 'em in deeds. They say, poor suitors have strong breaths; they shall know we havestrong arms, too.
Men. Why,masters, my good friends, mine honest neighbours, Will you undo yourselves_?
First Cit. We cannot, sir; we are undone already. [Revolution.]
Men. I tell you, friends,most charitable careHave thepatriciansof you. For your WANTS,—Your suffering in this dearth, you may as wellStrike at the heavenswith your staves, as lift them Against the Roman State, whose coursewill on The way it takes, cracking ten thousand curbs Of more strong link asunder, than can ever Appear in your impediment. For the dearth, Thegods, notthepatricians, make it; andYour kneesto them,not arms, musthelp.
[This sounds very pious, but it is not the piety of the new school. The doctrine of submission and suffering is indeed taught in it, and scientifically reinforced; but then it is the patient suffering of the harm 'which is not within our power' which is commendable, according to its tenets, and 'a wise and industrious suffering' of it, too. It is a wise 'accommodating of the nature of man to those points of nature and fortune which we cannot control,' that is pleasing to God, according to this creed.]
Alack!You are transported by calamity,Thither where more attends you; and you slanderThe helms o' the state, who care for you likefathers,When you curse them as enemies.
First Cit. CARE FOR us!True, INDEED! They ne'er cared for us yet. SUFFER us TO FAMISH, andtheirstore-houses CRAMMED WITH GRAIN!Make edicts for usury, to support usurers! Repeal daily any WHOLESOME ACTestablished against the rich, and provide more piercing statutes daily to chain up and restrain the poor! If the WARS eat us not up, THEY WILL; and there'sall the lovethey bear us.
Menenius attempts to counteract these impressions; but his story and his arguments appear to have some applications which he is not aware of, and are much more to the purpose of the party in arms than they are to his own. For it is a story in which the natural subordination of the parts to the whole in the fabric of human society is illustrated by that natural instance and symbol of unity and organization which the single human form itself present; and that condition of the state which has just been exhibited—one in which the body at large is dying of inanition that a part of it maysurfeit—is a condition which, in the light of this story, appears to need help of some kind, certainly.
But the platform is now ready. It is the hero's entrance for which we are preparing. It is on the ground of this sullen want that the author will exhibit him and his dazzling military virtues. It is as the doctor of thisdiseased common-wealthat he brings him in with his sword;
'EnterCAIUS MARCIUS.'
and that idea—the idea of the diseased commonwealth, which Menenius has already set forth—that notion ofpartsandpartiality, and dissonance and dissolution, which is a radical idea in the play, and runs into its minutest points of phraseology, breaks out at once in his rough speech.
Men. Hail, noble Marcius!
Mar. Thanks. What's the matter, you dissentious rogues,That rubbing the poor itch of your opinion,Makeyourselvesscabs.
[It is thecommon-wealthat must be madewholeand comely.OPINION! your opinion.]
First Cit. We have ever your good word.
Mar. In that will give good words tothee, will flatterBeneath abhorring.—What would you have, youcurs,That like nor peace, nor war? the one affrights you,The other makes you proud.Hethat trusts you,Where he should find you lions, finds you hares.Where foxes, geese! You are no surer, noThan is the coal of fire upon the ice,Or hail-stone in the sun. Yourvirtueis,To makehim worthywhoseoffence subdues him,And curse thatjusticedid it. Who deserves greatnessDeserves your hate: and your affections areA sick man's appetite, who desires most thatWhich would increase his evil.HethatdependsUpon your favours,swims withfins of lead,And hews downoakswith rushes. Hang ye! Trust ye?With every minute you do change a mind;
[This is not the principle ofstate, whether in the many or the one].
And callhimnoble, that was now your hate,Himvile, that was your garland.What's the matter,That in these several places of the cityYou cry against the noble senate, who,Under the gods, keep you in awe,which elseWould feed on one another?—What's their seeking?
Men. For corn at their own rates;whereof, they say,The city is well stor'd.
Mar. HANG 'EM! THEY SAY?THEY'LL SIT BY THE FIRE, and PRESUME to KNOWWHAT'S DONE I' THE CAPITOL: who's like to rise,Who thrives, and who declines: side factions, and give outConjectural marriages; making parties strong,Andfeeblingsuchas stand not in their liking,Below their cobbled shoes.They say, there's grain enough?Would the nobility lay aside their ruth,And let me use my sword,I'd make a quarryWith thousands of these quartered slaves, AS HIGHAs I couldprick my lance.
[Thealtitudeof his virtue;—themeasureof his greatness. That is the tableau of the first scene, in the first act of the play of the cure of the Common-weal and the Consulship.]
Men. Nay, these are almost thoroughly persuaded;For though abundantly they lack discretion,Yet are they passing cowardly. But I beseech you,What says the other troop?
Mar. They aredissolved: Hang 'em! [Footnote]They said, they were an hungry; sigh'd forth proverbs;— Thathunger broke stone walls; that,dogsmust eat; Thatmeat was made for mouths; THAT THE GODS SENT NOT CORN FOR THE RICH MEN ONLY:—With these shreds They vented their complainings; which being answer'd, And a petition granted them,a strange one, (To break theheart of generosity,And make bold power look pale,) they threw their caps As they would hang them on the horns o'the moon,Shouting their emulation.
[Footnote: 'The History of Henry VII.,' produced in the Historical Part of this work, but omitted here, contains the key to these readings.]
Men. What is granted them.
Mar. Five tribunesto defend their vulgar wisdoms,Of their own choice: One's Junius Brutus,Sicinius Velutus, and I know not—'Sdeath!The rabble should have first unroof'd the city;Ere so prevail'd with me;it will in timeWin upon POWER, and throw forth greater themesFor INSURRECTION'S arguing.
[Yes, surely it will. It cannot fail of it.]
Men. This is strange.Mar. Go, get youhome, youfragments! [fragments.]
[Enter a Messenger.]
Mes. Where's Caius Marcius?Mar. Here; What's the matter?Mes. The news is, Sir, the Volces are in arms.Mar. I am glad on't; then we shall have meansto vent Our musty superfluity:—See, our best elders.
[The procession from the Capitol is entering with two of the new officers of the commonwealth, and the two chief men of the army, with other senators.]
First Sen. Marcius, 'tis true, that you have lately told us;The Volsces are in arms.
Mar. They have a leader,Tullus Aufidius, that will put you to't.I sin in envyinghis nobility:And were I anything but what I am,I would wish me only he.
Com. You have fought together.
Mar. Were half to half the world by the ears, andheUpon my party, I'd revolt, to makeOnly my wars with him[Hear, hear].He is a lion.That I am proud tohunt.
First Sen.Then, WORTHYMarcius,Attend upon Cominius to these wars.
It is the relation of the spirit of military conquest, the relation of the military hero, and his government, to the true human need, which is subjected to criticism here; a criticism which is necessarily an after-thought in the natural order of the human development.
The transition 'from the casque to the cushion,' that so easy step in the heroic ages, whether it be 'an entrance by conquest,' foreign or otherwise, or whether the chieftain's own followers bring him home in triumph, and the people, whose battle he has won, conduct him to their chair of state, in either case, that transition appears, to this author's eye, worth going back, and looking into a little, in an age so advanced in civilization, as the one in which he finds himself.
For though he is, as any one who will take any pains to inquire, may easily satisfy himself,—the master in chief of the new science of nature,—and the deepest in its secrets of any, his views on that subject appear to be somewhat broader, his aspirations altogether of another kind, from those, to which his school have since limited themselves. He does not content himself with pinning butterflies and hunting down beetles; his scientific curiosity is not satisfied with classifying ferns and lichens, and ascertaining the proper historical position of pudding-stone and sand-stone, and in settling the difference between them and their neighbours. Nature is always, in all her varieties wonderful, and all 'her infinite book of secrecy,' that book which all the world had overlooked till he came, was to his eye, from the first, a book of spells, of magic lore, a Prospero book of enchantments. He would get the key to her cipher, he would find the lost alphabet of her unknown tongue; there is no page of her composing in which he would scorn to seek it—none which he would scorn to read with it: but then he has, notwithstanding, somechoicein his studies. He is of the opinion that some subjects are nobler than others, and that those which concern specially the human kind, have a special claim to their regard, and the secret of those combinations which result in the varieties of shell-fish, and other similar orders of being, donotexclusively, or chiefly, engage his attention.
There is another natural curiosity, which strikes the eye of the founder of the Science of Nature, as quite the most curious and wonderful thing going, so far, at least, as his observation has extended, though he is willing to make, as he takes pains to state, philosophical allowance for the partiality of species in determining this judgment, and is perfectly willing to concede, that if any particular species of shell-fish, for instance, were to undertake a science of things in general, that particular species would, no doubt, occupy the principal place in that system; especially if arts, tending to the improvement and elevation of it, were necessarily based on this larger specific knowledge.
Men, and their proceedings and organisms, men, and their habits and modes of combining, did appear to the eye of this scientific observer quite as well worth observing and noting, also, as bees and beavers, for instance, and their societies; and, accordingly, he made some observations himself, and notes, too, in this particular department of his general science. For, as he tells us elsewhere, he did not wish to map out the large fields of the science of observation in general, and exhibit to the world, in bare description, the method of it, without leaving some specimens of his own, of what might be done with it, in proper hands, under favourable circumstances, selecting for his experiments the principal and noblest subjects—those of the most immediate human concern. And he has not only very carefully laboured a few of these; but he has taken extraordinary pains to preserve them to us in their proper scientific form, with just as little of the ligature of the time on them as it was possible to leave.
It is no kind of beetle or butterfly, then, that this philosopher comes down upon here from the heights of his universal science—his science of the nature of things in general, but that great Spenserian monstrosity,—that diseased product of nature, which individual human nature, in spite of its natural pettiness and helplessness, under certain favourable conditions of absorption and accretion, may be made to yield. It is that dragon of lawless power which was overspreading, in his time, all the common human affairs, and infolding in its gaudy, baleful wings all the life of men,—it is that which takes from the first the speculative eye of this new speculator,—this founder of the science of things, and not of words instead of them. Here is a man of science, a born naturalist, who understands thatthisphenomenon lies in his department, and takes it to be his business, among other things, to examine it.
It was, indeed, a formidable phenomenon, as it presented itself to his apprehension; and his own words are always the best, when one knows how to read them—
'He sits in state, like a thing made for Alexander.' 'When he walks, he moves like an engine, and the ground shrinks before his treading.' 'He talks like a knell, his hum is a battery; what he bids be done, is finished at his bidding. He wants nothing of a god but eternity, anda heavento throne in.' 'Yes,' is the answer; 'yes,mercy, if you paint him truly.' 'I paint him in character.'
'Is it possible that so short a time can alter the conditions of aman?' inquires the speculator upon this phenomenon, and then comes the reply—'There's a differency between a grub and a butterfly, yetyour butterfly was a grub. This Marcius is grown fromMAN TO DRAGON; he has wings, he is more than a creeping thing.'
This is Coriolanus at the head of his army; but in Julius Caesar, it is nature in the wildness of the tempest—it is a night of unnatural horrors, that is brought in by the Poet to illustrate the enormity of the evil he deals with, and its unnatural character—'to serve as instrument of fear and warning untosomeMONSTROUS STATE.'
'Now couldI, Casca,Name totheea man most like this dreadful night;That thunders, lightens, opens graves, and roarsAs doth the lion in the Capitol:Aman no mightierthan thyself, or me,Inpersonal action, yet prodigious grown,And fearful, as these strange eruptions are.
Casca. TisCaesarthat you mean: Is it not, Cassius?
[I paint him in character.]
Cassius. Let it be—WHO IT IS:For Romans nowHave thewes and limbs like to their ancestors.'