In each lay poesy—for woman's heartNurses the stream, unsought and oft unseen;And if it flow not through the tide of art,Nor win the glittering daylight—you may weenIt slumbers, but not ceases, and if checkedThe egress of rich words, it flows in thought,And in its silent mirror doth reflectWhate'er affection to its banks hath brought.[Footnote: Milton.]
Yet the poetess has two of the strongest poets of the romantic period on her side. Wordsworth, in his many allusions to his sister Dorothy, appeared to feel her possibilities equal to his own, and in verses on an anthology, he offered praise of a more general nature to verse written by women. [Footnote: See To Lady Mary Lowther.] And beside the sober judgment of Wordsworth, one may place the unbounded enthusiasm of Shelley, who not only praises extravagantly the verse of an individual, Emilia Viviani, [Footnote: See the introduction to Epipsychidion.] but who also offers us an imaginary poetess of supreme powers,—Cythna, inThe Revolt of Islam.
It is disappointing to the agitator to find the question dropping out of sight in later verse. In the Victorian period it comes most plainly to the surface in Browning, and while the exquisite praise of his
Lyric love, half angel and half bird,
reveals him a believer in at least sporadic female genius, his position on the question of championing the entire sex is at least equivocal. InThe Two Poets of Croisiche deals with the eighteenth century in France, where the literary woman came so gloriously into her own. Browning represents a man writing under a feminine pseudonym and winning the admiration of the celebrities of the day—only to have his verse tossed aside as worthless as soon as his sex is revealed. Woman wins by her charm, seems to be the moral. A hopeful sign, however, is the fact that of late years one poet produced his best work under a femininenom de plume, and found it no handicap in obtaining recognition. [Footnote: William Sharp, "Fiona McLeod."] If indifference is the attitude of the male poet, not so of the woman writer. She insists that her work shall redound, not to her own glory, merely, but to that of her entire sex as well. For the most worthy presentation of her case, we must turn to Mrs. Browning, though the radical feminist is not likely to approve of her attitude. "My secret profession of faith," she admitted to Robert Browning, "is—that there is a natural inferiority of mind in women—of the intellect—not by any means of the moral nature—and that the history of Art and of genius testifies to this fact openly." [Footnote: Letter to Robert Browning, July 4, 1845.] Still, despite this private surrender to the enemy, Mrs. Browning defends her sex well.
In a short narrative poem,Mother and Poet, Mrs. Browning claims for her heroine the sterner virtues that have been denied her by the average critic, who assigns woman to sentimental verse as her proper sphere. Of course her most serious consideration of the problem is to be found inAurora Leigh. She feels that making her imaginary poet a woman is a departure from tradition, and she strives to justify it. Much of the debasing adulation and petty criticism heaped upon Aurora must have been taken from Mrs. Browning's own experience. Ignoring insignificant antagonism to her, Aurora is seriously concerned with the charges that the social worker, Romney Leigh, brings against her sex. Romney declares,
Women as you are,Mere women, personal and passionate,You give us doting mothers, and perfect wives,Sublime Madonnas and enduring saints!We get no Christ from you,—and verilyWe shall not get a poet, in my mind.
Aurora is obliged to acknowledge to herself that Romney is right in charging women with inability to escape from personal considerations. She confesses,
We women are too apt to look to one,Which proves a certain impotence in art.
But in the end, and after much struggling, Aurora wins for her poetry even Romney's reluctant admiration. Mrs. Browning's implication seems to be that the intensely "personal and passionate" nature of woman is an advantage to her, if once she can lift herself from its thraldom, because it saves her from the danger of dry generalization which assails verse of more masculine temper. [Footnote: For treatment of the question of the poet's sex in American verse by women, see Emma Lazarus,Echoes; Olive Dargan,Ye Who are to Sing.]
Of only less vital concern to poets than the question of the poet's physical constitution is the problem of his environment. Where will the chains of mortality least hamper his aspiring spirit?
In answer, one is haunted by the line,
I too was born in Arcadia.
Still, this is not the answer that poets would make in all periods. In the eighteenth century, for example, though a stereotyped conception of the shepherd poet ruled,—as witness the verses of Hughes, [Footnote: SeeCorydon.] Collins, [Footnote: SeeSelim, or the Shepherd's Moral.] and Thomson,[Footnote: SeePastoral on the Death of Daemon.]—it is obvious that these gentlemen were in no literal sense expressing their views on the poet's habitat. It was hardly necessary for Thomas Hood to parody their efforts in his eclogues giving a broadly realistic turn to shepherds assuming the singing robes. [Footnote: SeeHuggins and Duggins, andThe Forlorn Shepherd's Complaint.] Wherever a personal element enters, as in John Hughes'Letter to a Friend in the Country, and Sidney Dyer'sA Country Walk, it is apparent that the poet is not indigenous to the soil. He is the city gentleman, come out to enjoy a holiday.
With the growth of a romantic conception of nature, the relation of the poet to nature becomes, of course, more intimate. But Cowper and Thomson keep themselves out of their nature poetry to such an extent that it is hard to tell what their ideal position would be, and not till the publication of Beattie'sThe Minstreldo we find a poem in which the poet is nurtured under the influence of a natural scenery. At the very climax of the romantic period the poet is not always bred in the country. We find Byron revealing himself as one who seeks nature only occasionally, as a mistress in whose novelty resides a good deal of her charm. Shelley, too, portrays a poet reared in civilization, but escaping to nature. [Footnote: SeeEpipsychidion, andAlastor.] Still, it is obvious that ever since the time of Burns and Wordsworth, the idea of a poet nurtured from infancy in nature's bosom has been extremely popular.
There are degrees of naturalness in nature, however. How far from the hubbub of commercialism should the poet reside? Burns and Wordsworth were content with the farm country, but for poets whose theories were not so intimately joined with experience such an environment was too tame. Bowles would send his visionary boy into the wilderness. [Footnote: SeeThe Visionary Boy.] Coleridge and Southey went so far as to lay plans for emigrating, in person, to the banks of the Susquehanna. Shelley felt that savage conditions best foster poetry. [Footnote: See theDefense of Poetry: "In the infancy of society every author is necessarily a poet."] Campbell, inGertrude of Wyoming, made his bard an Indian, and commented on his songs,
So finished he the rhyme, howe'er uncouth,That true to Nature's fervid feelings ran(And song is but the eloquence of truth).
The early American poet, J. G. Percival, expressed the same theory, declaring of poetry,
Its seat is deeper in the savage breastThan in the man of cities.[Footnote:Poetry.]
To most of us, this conception of the poet is familiar because of acquaintance, from childhood, with Chibiabus, "he the sweetest of all singers," in Longfellow'sHiawatha.
But the poet of to-day may well pause, before he starts to an Indian reservation. What is the mysterious benefit which the poet derives from nature? Humility and common sense, Burns would probably answer, and that response would not appeal to the majority of poets. A mystical experience of religion, Wordsworth would say, of course. A wealth of imagery, nineteenth century poets would hardly think it worth while to add, for the influence of natural scenery upon poetic metaphors has come to be such a matter of course that one hardly realizes its significance. Perhaps, too, poets should admit oftener than they do the influence of nature's rhythms upon their style. As Madison Cawein says
If the wind and the brook and the bird would teachMy heart their beautiful parts of speech,And the natural art they say these with,My soul would sing of beauty and mythIn a rhyme and a meter none beforeHave sung in their love, or dreamed in their lore.[Footnote:Preludes.]
The influence of nature which the romantic poet stressed most, however, was a negative one. In a sense in which Wordsworth probably did not intend it, the romantic poet betrayed himself hastening to nature
More like a manFlying from something that he dreads, than oneWho sought the thing he loved.
What nature is not, seemed often her chief charm to the romanticist. Bowles sent his visionary boy to "romantic solitude." Byron [Footnote: SeeChilde Harold.] and Shelley, [Footnote: SeeEpipsychidion.] too, were as much concerned with escaping from humanity as with meeting nature. Only Wordsworth, in the romantic period, felt that the poet's life ought not to be wholly disjoined from his fellows. [Footnote: SeeTintern Abbey,Ode on Intimations of Immortality,andThe Prelude.]
Of course the poet's quarrel with his unappreciative public has led him to express a longing for complete solitude sporadically, even down to the present time, but by the middle of the nineteenth century "romantic solitude" as the poet's perennial habitat seems just about to have run its course. Of the major poets, Matthew Arnold alone consistently urges the poet to flee from "the strange disease of modern life." The Scholar Gypsy lives the ideal life of a poet, Matthew Arnold would say, and preserves his poetical temperament because of his escape from civilization:
For early didst thou leave the world, with powersFresh, undiverted to the world without,Firm to their mark, not spent on other things;Free from the sick fatigue, the languid doubtWhich much to have tried, in much been baffled brings.
No doubt, solitude magnifies the poet's sense of his own personality.Stephen Phillips says of Emily Brontë's poetic gift,
Only barren hillsCould wring the woman riches out of thee,[Footnote:Emily Brontë.]
and there are several poets of whom a similar statement might be made. But the Victorians were aware that only half of a poet's nature was developed thus. Tennyson [Footnote: SeeThe Palace of Art.] and Mrs. Browning [Footnote: SeeThe Poet's Vow; Letters to Robert Browning, January 1, 1846, and March 20, 1845.] both sounded a warning as to the dangers of complete isolation. And at present, though the eremite poet is still with us, [Footnote: See Lascelles Ambercrombe,An Escape; J. E. Flecker,Dirge; Madison Cawein,Comrading; Yeats,The Lake Isle of Innisfree.] he does not have everything his own way.
For it has begun to occur to poets that it may not have been merely anuntoward accident that several of their loftiest brethren were reared in London. In the romantic period even London-bred Keats said, as a matter of course,
The coy muse, with me she would not liveIn this dark city,[Footnote:Epistle to George Felton Mathew. Wordsworth's sonnet,"Earth has not anything to show more fair," seems to have been unique atthis time.]
and the American romanticist, Emerson, said of the poet,
In cities he was low and mean;The mountain waters washed him clean.[Footnote:The Poet.]
But Lowell protested against such a statement, avowing of the muse,
She can find a nobler theme for songIn the most loathsome man that blasts the sightThan in the broad expanse of sea and shore.[Footnote:L'Envoi.]
A number of the Victorians acknowledged that they lived from choice in London. Christina Rossetti admitted frankly that she preferred London to the country, and defended herself with Bacon's statement, "The souls of the living are the beauty of the world." [Footnote: See E. L. Gary,The Rossettis, p. 236.] Mrs. Browning made Aurora outgrow pastoral verse, and not only reside in London, but find her inspiration there. Francis Thompson and William Henley were not ashamed to admit that they were inspired by London. James Thomson, B.V., belongs with them in this regard, for though he depicted the horror of visions conjured up in the city streets in a way unparalleled in English verse, [Footnote: SeeThe City of Dreadful Night.] this is not the same thing as the romantic poet's repudiation of the city as an unimaginative environment.
Coming to more recent verse, we find Austin Dobson still feeling it an anomaly that his muse should prefer the city to the country. [Footnote: SeeOn London Stones.] John Davidson, also, was very self-conscious about his city poets. [Footnote: SeeFleet Street Eclogues.] But as landscape painters are beginning to see and record the beauty in the most congested city districts, so poets have been making their muse more and more at home there, until our contemporary poets scarcely stop to take their residence in the city otherwise than as a matter of course. Alan Seeger cries out for Paris as the ideal habitat of the singer. [Footnote: SeeParis.] Even New York and Chicago [Footnote: See Carl Sandburg,Chicago Poems; Edgar Lee Masters,The Loop; William Griffith,City Pastorals; Charles H. Towne,The City.] are beginning to serve as backgrounds for the poet figure. A poem calledA Winter Nightreveals Sara Teasdale as thoroughly at home in Manhattan as the most bucolic shepherd among his flocks.
To poets' minds the only unæsthetic habitat nowadays seems to be the country town. Although Edgar Lee Masters writes what he calls poetry inspired by it, the reader of theSpoon River Anthologyis still disposed to sympathize with Benjamin Fraser of Spoon River, the artist whose genius was crushed by his ghastly environment.
So manifold, in fact, are the attractions of the world to the modern poet, that the vagabond singer has come into special favor lately. Of course he has appeared in English song ever since the time of minstrels, but usually, as in the Old English poem,The Wanderer, he has been unhappy in his roving life. Even so modern a poet as Scott was in the habit of portraying his minstrels as old and homesick. [Footnote: SeeThe Lay of the Last Minstrel.] But Byron set the fashion among poets of desiring "a world to roam through," [Footnote:Epistle to Augusta.] and the poet who is a wanderer from choice has not been unknown since Byron's day. [Footnote: Alfred Dommett and George Borrow are notable.] The poet vagabond of to-day, as he is portrayed in Maurice Hewlitt's autobiographical novels,Rest HarrowandOpen Country, and William H. Davies' tramp poetry, looks upon his condition in life as ideal. [Footnote: See also Francis Carlin,Denby the Rhymer(1918); Henry Herbert Knibbs,Songs of the Trail(1920)] Alan Seeger, too, concurred in the view, declaring,
Down the free roads of human happinessI frolicked, poor of purse but light of heart.[Footnote:Sonnet to Sidney.]
"Poor of purse!" The words recall us to another of the poet's quarrels with the world in which he is imprisoned. Should the philanthropist, as has often been suggested, endow the poet with an independent income? What a long and glorious tradition would then be broken! From Chaucer'sComplaint to His Empty Purse, onward, English poetry has borne the record of its maker's poverty. The verse of our period is filled with names from the past that offer our poets a noble precedent for their destitution,—Homer, Cervantes, Camöens, Spenser, Dryden, Butler, Johnson, Otway, Collins, Chatterton, Burns,—all these have their want exposed in nineteeth and twentieth century verse.
The wary philanthropist, before launching into relief schemes, may well inquire into the cause of such wretchedness. The obvious answer is, of course, that instead of earning a livelihood the poet has spent his time on a vocation that makes no pecuniary return. Poets like to tell us, also, that their pride, and a fine sense of honour, hold them back from illegitimate means of acquiring wealth. But tradition has it that there are other contributing causes. Edmund C. Stedman'sBohemiareveals the fact that the artist has most impractical ideas about the disposal of his income. He reasons that, since the more guests he has, the smaller the cost per person, then if he can only entertain extensively enough, the costper caputwill benil. Not only so, but the poet is likely to lose sight completely of tomorrow's needs, once he has a little ready cash on hand. A few years ago, Philistines derived a good deal of contemptuous amusement from a poet's statement,
Had I two loaves of bread—ay, ay!One would I sell and daffodils buyTo feed my soul.[Footnote:Beauty, Theodore Harding Rand.]
What is to be done with such people? Charity officers are continually asking.
What relief measure can poets themselves suggest? When they are speaking of older poets, they are apt to offer no constructive criticism, but only denunciation of society. Their general tone is that of Burns' linesWritten Under the Portrait of Ferguson:
Curse on ungrateful man that can be pleasedAnd yet can starve the author of the pleasure.
Occasionally the imaginary poet who appears in their verse is quite as bitter. Alexander Smith's hero protests against being "dungeoned in poverty." One of Richard Gilder's poets warns the public,
You need not weep for and sigh for and saint meAfter you've starved me and driven me dead.Friends, do you hear? What I want is bread.[Footnote:The Young Poet.]
Through the thin veneer of the fictitious poet in Joaquin Miller'sIna, the author himself appears, raving,
A poet! a poet forsooth! Fool! hungry fool!Would you know what it means to be a poet?It is to want a friend, to want a home,A country, money,—aye, to want a meal.[Footnote: See also John Savage,He Writes for Bread.]
But in autobiographical verse, the tone changes, and the poet refuses to pose as a candidate for charity. Rather, he parades an ostentatious horror of filthy lucre, only paralleled by his distaste for food. Mrs. Browning boasts,
The Devil himself scarce trusts his patentedGold-making art to any who makes rhymes,But culls his Faustus from philosophersAnd not from poets.[Footnote:Aurora Leigh.]
A poet who can make ends meet is practically convicted of being no true artist. Shakespeare is so solitary an exception to this rule, that his mercenary aspect is a pure absurdity to his comrades, as Edwin Arlington Robinson conceives of them. [Footnote: SeeBen Jonson Entertains a Man from Stratford.] In the eighteenth century indifference to remuneration was not so marked, and in poetic epistles, forgers of the couplet sometimes concerned themselves over the returns, [Footnote: SeeAdvice to Mr. Pope, John Hughes;Economy, The Poet and the Dun, Shenstone.] but since the romantic movement began, such thought has been held unworthy. [Footnote: SeeTo a Poet Abandoning His Art, Barry Cornwall; andPoets and Poets, T. E. Browne. On the other hand, see Sebastian Evans,Religio Poetae.] In fact, even in these days, we are comparatively safe from a poet's strike.
Usually the poet declares that as for himself, he is indifferent to his financial condition. Praed speaks fairly for his brethren, when inA Ballad Teaching How Poetry Is Best Paid For, he represents their terms as very easy to meet. Even the melancholy Bowles takes on this subject, for once, a cheerful attitude, telling his visionary boy,
Nor fear, if grim before thine eyesPale worldly want, a spectre lowers;What is a world of vanitiesTo a world as fair as ours?
In the same spirit Burns belittles his poverty, saying, inAn Epistle to Davie, Fellow Poet:
To lie in kilns and barns at e'enWhen bones are crazed, and blind is thinIs doubtless great distress,Yet then content would make us blest.
Shelley, too, eschews wealth, declaring, inEpipsychidion,
Our simple life wants little, and true tasteHires not the pale drudge luxury to wasteThe scene it would adorn.
Later poetry is likely to take an even exuberant attitude toward poverty. [Footnote: See especially verse on the Mermaid group, asTales of the Mermaid Inn, Alfred Noyes. See also Josephine Preston Peabody,The Golden Shoes; Richard Le Gallienne,Faery Gold; J. G. Saxe,The Poet to his Garret; W. W. Gibson,The Empty Purse; C. G. Halpine,To a Wealthy Amateur Critic; Simon Kerl,Ode to Debt, A Leaf of Autobiography; Thomas Gordon Hake,The Poet's Feast; Dana Burnet,In a Garret; Henry Aylett Sampson,Stephen Phillips Bankrupt.] The poet's wealth of song is so great that he leaves coin to those who wish it. Indeed he often has a superstitious fear of wealth, lest it take away his delight in song. In Markham'sThe Shoes of Happiness, only the poet who is too poor to buy shoes possesses the secret of joy. With a touching trust in providence, another poet cries,
Starving, still I smile,Laugh at want and wrong,He is fed and clothedTo whom God giveth song.[Footnote: Anne Reeve Aldrich,A Crowned Poet.]
It is doubtful indeed that the poet would have his fate averted. Pope's satirical coupling of want and song, as cause and effect,
One cell there is, concealed from vulgar eye,The cave of Poverty and Poetry.Keen, hollow winds howl through the bleak recess,Emblem of music caused by emptiness,[Footnote:Dunciad.]
is accepted quite literally by later writers. Emerson's theory of compensations applies delightfully here as everywhere, and he meditates on the poet,
The Muse gave special chargeHis learning should be deep and large,—* * * * *His flesh should feel, his eyes should readEvery maxim of dreadful need.* * * * *By want and pain God screeneth himTill his appointed hour.[Footnote:The Poet.]
It may appear doubtful to us whether the poet has painted ideal conditions for the nurture of genius in his picture of the poet's physical frame, his environment, and his material endowment, inasmuch as the death rate among young bards,—imaginary ones, at least, is appalling. What can account for it?
In a large percentage of cases, the poet's natural frailty of constitution is to blame for his early death, of course, but another popular explanation is that the very keenness of the poet's flame causes it to burn out the quicker. Byron finds an early death fitting to him,
For I had the share of life that might have filled a century,Before its fourth in time had passed me by.[Footnote:Epistle to Augusta.]
A fictitious poet looks back upon the same sort of life, and reflects,
… For my thirty years,Dashed with sun and splashed with tears,Wan with revel, red with wine,Other wiser happier menTake the full three score and ten.[Footnote: Alfred Noyes,Tales of the Mermaid Inn.]
this richness of experience is not inevitably bound up with recklessness, poets feel. The quality is in such a poet even as Emily Brontë, of whom it is written:
They live not long of thy pure fire composed;Earth asks but mud of those that will endure.[Footnote: Stephen Phillips.Emily Brontë.]
Another cause of the poet's early death is certainly his fearlessness.Shelley prophesies that his daring spirit will meet death
Far from the trembling throngWhose souls are never to the tempest given.[Footnote:Adonais.]
With the deaths of Rupert Brooke, Alan Seeger, Joyce Kilmer, and Francis Ledwidge, this element in the poet's disposition has been brought home to the public. Joyce Kilmer wrote back from the trenches, "It is wrong for a poet … to be listening to elevated trains when there are screaming shells to hear … and the bright face of danger to dream about." [Footnote: Letter to his wife, March 12, 1918.] And in his article on Joyce Kilmer inThe Bookman, Richard LeGallienne speaks of young poets "touched with the ringer of a moonlight that has written 'fated' upon their brows," adding, "Probably our feeling is nothing more than our realization that temperaments so vital and intense must inevitably tempt richer and swifter fates than those less wild-winged."
It is a question whether poets would expect us to condole with them or to felicitate them upon the short duration of their subjection to mortality. Even when the poet speaks of his early death solely with regard to its effect upon his earthly reputation, his attitude is not wholly clear. Much elegiac verse expresses such stereotyped sorrow for a departed bard that it is not significant. In other cases, one seems to overhear the gasp of relief from a patron whom time can never force to retract his superlative claims for his protégé's promise.
More significant is a different note which is sometimes heard. In Alexander Smith'sLife Drama, it is ostensibly ironic. The critic muses,
He died—'twas shrewd:And came with all his youth and unblown hopesOn the world's heart, and touched it into tears.
InSordello, likewise, it is the unappreciative critic who expresses this sort of pleasure in Eglamor's death. But this feeling has also been expressed with all seriousness, as in Stephen Phillip'sKeats:
I have seen more glory in sunriseThan in the deepening of azure noon,
or in Francis Thompson'sThe Cloud's Swan Song:
I thought of Keats, that died in perfect time,In predecease of his just-sickening song,Of him that set, wrapped in his radiant rhyme,Sunlike in sea. Life longer had been life too long.
Obviously we are in the wake of the Rousseau theory, acclimatized in English poetry by Wordsworth's youth "who daily farther from the east must travel." A long array of poets testifies to the doctrine that a poet's first days are his best. [Footnote: See S. T. Coleridge,Youth and Age; J. G. Percival,Poetry; William Cullen Bryant,I Cannot Forget with What Fervid Devotion; Bayard Taylor,The Return of the Goddess; Richard Watson Gilder,To a Young Poet,The Poet's Secret; George Henry Boker,To Bayard Taylor; Martin Farquhar Tupper,To a Young Poet; William E. Henley,Something Is Dead; Francis Thompson,From the Night of Foreboding; Thomas Hardy,In the Seventies; Lewis Morris,On a Young Poet; Richard Le Gallienne,A Face in a Book; Richard Middleton,The Faithful Poet, The Boy Poet; Don Marquis,The Singer(1915); John Hall Wheelock,The Man to his Dead Poet(1919); Cecil Roberts,The Youth of Beauty(1915); J. Thorne Smith, jr.,The Lost Singer(1920); Edna St. Vincent Millay,To a Poet that Died Young.]Optima dies…prima fugit; the note echoes and reechoes through English poetry. Hear it in Arnold'sProgress of Poetry:
Youth rambles on life's arid mount,And strikes the rock and finds the vein,And brings the water from the fount.The fount which shall not flow again.
The man mature with labor chopsFor the bright stream a channel grand,And sees not that the sacred dropsRan off and vanished out of hand.
And then the old man totters nighAnd feebly rakes among the stones;The mount is mute, the channel dry,And down he lays his weary bones.
But the strangle hold of complimentary verse upon English poetry, if nothing else, would prevent this view being unanimously expressed there. For in the Victorian period, poets who began their literary careers by prophesying their early decease lived on and on. They themselves might bewail the loss of their gift in old age—in fact, it was usual for them to do so [Footnote: See Scott,Farewell to the Muse; Landor,Dull is my Verse; J. G. Percival,Invocation; Matthew Arnold,Growing Old; Longfellow,My Books; O. W. Holmes,The Silent Melody; C. W. Stoddard,The Minstrel's Harp; P. H. Hayne,The Broken Chords; J. C. MacNiel,A Prayer; Harvey Hubbard,The Old Minstrel.]—but it would never do for their disciples to concur in the sentiment. Consequently we have a flood of complimentary verses, assuring the great poets of their unaltered charm.[Footnote: See Swinburne,Age and Song, The Centenary of Landor, Statue of Victor Hugo; O. W. Holmes,Whittier's Eightieth Birthday, Bryant's Seventieth Birthday; E. E. Stedman,Ad Vatem; P. H. Hayne,To Longfellow; Richard Gilder,Jocoseria; M. F. Tupper,To the Poet of Memory; Edmund Gosse,To Lord Tennyson on his Eightieth Birthday; Alfred Noyes,Ode for the Seventieth Birthday of Swinburne; Alfred Austin,The Poet's Eightieth Birthday; Lucy Larcom,J. G. Whittier; Mary Clemmer,To Whittier; Percy Mackaye,Browning to Ben Ezra.] And of course it is all worth very little as indicating the writer's attitude toward old age. Yet the fact that Landor was still singing as he "tottered on into his ninth decade,"—that Browning, Tennyson, Swinburne, Longfellow, Whittier, Holme's, and Whitman continued to feel the stir of creation when their hair was hoary, may have had a genuine influence on younger writers.
Greater significance attaches to the fact that some of the self-revealing verse lamenting the decay of inspiration in old age is equivocal, as Landor's
Dull is my verse: not even thouWho movest many cares awayFrom this lone breast and weary browCanst make, as once, its fountains play;No, nor those gentle words that nowSupport my heart to hear thee say,The bird upon the lonely boughSings sweetest at the close of day.
It is, of course, even more meaningful when the aged poet, disregarding convention, frankly asserts the desirability of long life for his race. Browning, despite the sadness of the poet's age recorded inCleonand thePrologue to Aslando, should doubtless be remembered for his belief in
The last of life for which the first was made,
as applied to poets as well as to other men. In America old age found its most enthusiastic advocate in Walt Whitman, who in linesTo Get the Final Lilt of Songsindicated undiminished confidence in himself at eighty. Bayard Taylor, [Footnote: SeeMy Prologue.] too, and Edward Dowden, [Footnote: SeeThe Mage.] were not dismayed by their longevity.
But we are most concerned, naturally, with wholly impersonal verse, and in it the aged poet is never wholly absent from English thought. As the youthful singer suggests the southland, so the aged bard seems indigenous to the north. It seems inevitable that Gray should depict the Scotch bard as old, [Footnote:The Bard.] and that Scott's minstrels should be old. Campbell, too, follows the Scotch tradition. [Footnote: SeeLochiel's Warning.] It is the prophetic power of these fictional poets, no doubt, that makes age seem essential to them. The poet in Campbell's poem explains,
'Tis the sunset of life gives me mystical lore.
Outside of Scotch poetry one finds, occasionally, a similar faith in the old poet. Mrs. Browning's observation tells her that maturity alone can express itself with youthful freshness. Aurora declares,
I count it strange and hard to understandThat nearly all young poets should write old.… It may be perhapsSuch have not settled long and deep enoughIn trance to attain to clairvoyance, and stillThe memory mixes with the vision, spoilsAnd works it turbid. Or perhaps againIn order to discover the Muse SphinxThe melancholy desert must sweep aroundBehind you as before.
Aurora feels, indeed, that the poet's gift is not proved till age. She sighs, remembering her own youth,
Alas, near all the birdsWill sing at dawn,—and yet we do not takeThe chaffering swallow for the holy lark.
Coinciding with this feeling is Rossetti's sentiment:… Many men are poets in their youth,But for one sweet-strung soul the wires prolongEven through all age the indomitable song.[Footnote:Genius in Beauty.]
Alice Meynell, [Footnote: SeeTo any Poet.] too, and Richard Watson Gilder [Footnote: SeeLife is a Bell.] feel that increasing power of song comes with age.
It is doubtless natural that the passionate romantic poets insisted upon the poet's youth, while the thoughtful Victorians often thought of himas old. For one is born with nerves, and it does not take long for them to wear out; on the other hand a great deal of experience is required before one can even begin to think significantly. Accordingly one is not surprised, in the turbulent times of Elizabeth, to find Shakespeare, at thirty, asserting,
In me thou seest the glowing of such fireAs on the ashes of his youth doth lie,
and conversely it seems fitting that aDe Senectuteshould come from an Augustan period. As for the attitude toward age of our own day,—the detestation of age expressed by Alan Seeger [Footnote: SeeThere Was a Youth Around Whose Early Way.] and Rupert Brooke, [Footnote: SeeThe Funeral of Youth: Threnody.]—the complaint of Francis Ledwidge, at twenty-six, that years are robbing him of his inspiration, [Footnote: SeeGrowing Old, Youth.]—that, to their future readers, will only mean that they lived in days of much feeling and action, and that they died young. [Footnote: One of the war poets, Joyce Kilmer, was already changing his attitude at thirty. Compare his juvenile verse, "It is not good for poets to grow old," with the later poem,Old Poets.] As the world subsides, after its cataclysm, into contemplative revery, it is inevitable that poets will, for a time, once more conceive as their ideal, not a singer aflame with youth and passion, but a poet of rich experience and profound reflection,
White-bearded and with eyes that look afarFrom their still region of perpetual snow,Beyond the little smokes and stirs of men.[Footnote: James Russell Lowell,Thorwald's Lay.]
Do thePhaedrusand theSymposiumleave anything to be said on the relationship of love and poetry? In the last analysis, probably not. The poet, however, is not one to keep silence because of a dearth of new philosophical conceptions. As he discovers, with ever fresh wonder, the power of love as muse, each new poet, in turn, is wont to pour his gratitude for his inspiration into song, undeterred by the fact that love has received many encomiums before.
It is not strange that this hymn should be broken by rude taunts on the part of the uninitiated.
Saynt Idiote, Lord of these foles alle,
Chaucer's Troilus called Love, long ago, and the general public has been no less free with this characterization in the last century than in the fourteenth. Nor is it merely that part of the public which associates all verse with sentimentality, and flees from it as from a contagion, which thus sneers at the praise lovers give to their divinity. On the contrary, certain young aspirants to the poet's laurel, feeling that the singer's indebtedness to love is an overworked theme, have tried, like the non-lover of thePhaedrus, to charm the literary public by the novelty of a different profession. As the non-lover of classic Greece was so fluent in his periods that Socrates and Phaedrus narrowly escaped from being overwhelmed by his much speaking, so the non-lover of the present time says much for himself.
In the first place, our non-lover may assure us, the nature of love is such that it involves contempt for the life of a bard. For love is a mad pursuit of life at first hand, in its most engrossing aspect, and it renders one deaf and blind to all but the object of the chase; while poetry is, as Plato points out, [Footnote: See theRepublicX, § 599-601; andPhaedrus, § 248.] only a pale and lifeless imitation of the ardors and delights which the lover enjoys at first hand. Moreover, one who attempts to divide his attention between the muse and an earthly mistress, is likely not only to lose the favor of the former, but, as the ubiquity of the rejected poet in verse indicates, to lose the latter as well, because his temperament will incline him to go into retirement and meditate upon his lady's charms, when he should be flaunting his own in her presence. It will not be long, indeed, before he has so covered the object of his affection with the leafage of his fancy, that she ceases to have an actual existence for him at all. The non-lover may remind us that even so ardent an advocate of love as Mrs. Browning voices this danger, confessing, inSonnets of the Portuguese, [Footnote: Sonnet XXIX.]
My thoughts do twine and budAbout thee, as wild vines about a treePut out broad leaves, and soon there's nought to seeExcept the straggling green that hides the wood.
The non-lover may also recall to our minds the notorious egotism and self-sufficiency of the poet, which seem incompatible with the humility and insatiable yearning of the lover. He exults in the declaration of Keats,
My solitude is sublime,—for, instead of what I have described (i.e., domestic bliss) there is sublimity to welcome me home; the roaring of the wind is my wife; and the stars through the windowpanes are my children; the mighty abstract idea of beauty in all things, I have, stifles the more divided and minute domestic happiness. [Footnote: Letter to George Keats, October 31, 1818.]
Borne aloft by his admiration for this passage, the non-lover may himself essay to be sublime. He may picture to us the frozen heights on which genius resides, where the air is too rare for earthly affection. He may declare that Keats' Grecian Urn is a symbol of all art, which must be
All breathing human passion far above.
He will assert that the mission of the poet is "to see life steadily and see it whole," a feat which is impossible if the worship of one figure out of the multitude is allowed to distort relative values, and to throw his view out of perspective.
Finally, the enemy of love may call as witnesses poets whom he fancies he has led astray. Strangely enough, considering the dedication of theRing and the Book, he is likely to give most conspicuous place among these witnesses to Browning. Like passages of Holy Writ, lines from Browning have been used as the text for whatever harangue a new theorist sees fit to give us. InYouth and Art, the non-lover will point out the characteristic attitude of young people who are "married to their art," and consequently have no capacity for other affection. InPauline, he will gloat over the hero's confession that he is inept in love because he is concerned with his perceptions rather than with their objects, and his explanation,
I am made up of an intensest life;Of a most clear idea of consciousnessOf self …And I can love nothing,—and this dull truthHas come at last: but sense supplies a loveEncircling me and mingling with my life.
He will point out that Sordello is another example of the same type, for though Sordello is ostensibly the lover of Palma, he really finds nothing outside himself worthy of his unbounded adoration. [Footnote: Compare Browning's treatment of Sordello with the conventional treatment of him as lover, inSordello, by Mrs. W. Buck (1837).] Turning to Tennyson, inLucretiusthe non-lover will note the tragic death of the hero that grows out of the asceticism in love engendered by his absorption in composition. With the greatest pride the enemy of love will point to his popularity in the 1890's, when the artificial and heartless artist enjoyed his greatest vogue. As his most scintillating advocate he will choose Oscar Wilde. Assuring us of many prose passages in his favor, he will read to us the expression of conflict between love and art inFlower of Love, where Wilde exclaims,
I have made my choice, have lived my poems, and though my youth isgone in wasted days,I have found the lover's crown of myrtle better than the poet'scrown of bays,
and he will read the record of the same sense of conflict, in different mood, expressed in the sonnetHélas:
To drift with every passion till my soulIs a stringed lute on which all winds can play,Is it for this that I have given awayMine ancient wisdom and austere control?Methinks my life is a twice-written scrollScrawled over on some boyish holidayWith idle songs for pipe and virelai,Which do but mar the secret of the whole.Surely there was a time I might have trodThe sunlit heights, and from life's dissonanceStruck one clear chord to reach the ears of God.Is that time dead? Lo, with a little rodI did but touch the honey of romance,And must I lose a soul's inheritance?
And yet, when the non-lover has finally arrived at the peroration of his defense, we may remain unshaken in our conviction that from theSong of Solomonto theLove Songs of Sara Teasdale, the history of poetry constitutes an almost unbroken hymn to the power of love, "the poet, and the source of poetry in others," [Footnote:The Symposiumof Plato, § 196.] as Agathon characterized him at the banquet in Love's honour. Within the field of our especial inquiry, the last century, we may rest assured that there is no true poet whose work, rightly interpreted, is out of tune with this general acclaim. Even Browning and Oscar Wilde are to be saved, although, it may be, only as by fire.
The influence of love upon poetry, which we are assuming with sucha prioricertainty, is effected in various ways. The most obvious, of course, is by affording new subject matter. The confidence of Shakespeare,
How can my muse want subject to inventWhile thou dost breathe, that pourest into my verseThine own sweet argument?
is at least as characteristic of the nineteenth as of the sixteenth century. The depletion of our lyric poetry, if everything relating to the singer's love affairs were omitted, is appalling even to contemplate. Yet, if this were the extent of love's influence upon poetry, one would have to class it, in kind if not in degree, with any number of other personal experiences that have thrilled the poet to composition.
The scope of love's influence is widened when one reflects upon its efficacy as a prize held up before the poet, spurring him on to express himself. In this aspect poetry is often a form of spiritual display comparable to the gay plumage upon the birds at mating season. In the case of women poets, verse often affords an essentially refined and lady-like manner of expressing one's sentiments toward a possible suitor. The convention so charmingly expressed in William Morris' lines,Rhyme Slayeth Shame, seems to be especially grateful to them. At times the ruse fails, as a writer has recently admitted:
All sing it now, all praise its artless art,But ne'er the one for whom the song was made,[Footnote: Edith Thomas,Vos non Nobis.]
but perhaps the worth of the poetry is not affected by the stubbornness of its recipient. Sara Teasdale very delicately names her anthology of love poems by women,The Answering Voice, but half the poems reveal the singer speaking first, while a number of them show her expressing an open-minded attitude toward any possible applicant for her hand among her readers. But it is not merely for its efficacy as a matrimonial agency that poets are indebted to love.
Since the nineteenth century is primarily the age of the love story, personal experience of love has been invaluable to the poet in a third way. The taste of the time has demanded that the poet sing of the tender theme almost exclusively, whether in dramatic, lyric or narrative, whether in historical or fictional verse. This is, of course, one reason that, wherever the figure of a bard appears in verse, he is almost always portrayed as a lover. Not to illustrate exhaustively, three of the most widely read poems with poet heroes, of the beginning, middle and end of the century respectively,i. e., Moore'sLalla Rookh, Mrs. Browning'sLady Geraldine's Courtship, and Coventry Patmore'sThe Angel in the House, all depend for plot interest upon their hero's implication in a love affair. The authors' love affairs were invaluable, no doubt, since a poet is not be expected to treat adequately a passion which he has not experienced himself. It is true that one hears from time to time, notably in the 1890's, that the artist should remain apart from, and coldly critical of the emotions he portrays. But this is not the typical attitude of our period. When one speaks thus, he is usually thought to be confusing the poet with the literary man, who writes from calculation rather than from inspiration. The dictum of Aristotle, "Those who feel emotion are most convincing through a natural sympathy with the characters they represent," [Footnote:PoeticsXVII, Butcher's translation.] has appeared self-evident to most critics of our time.
But the real question of inspiration by love goes deeper and is connected with Aristotle's further suggestion that poetry involves "a strain of madness," a statement which we are wont to interpret as meaning that the poet is led by his passions rather than by his reason. This constitutes the gist of the whole dispute between the romanticist and the classicist, and our poets are such ardent devotees of love as their muse, simply because, in spite of other short-lived fads, the temper of the last century has remained predominantly romantic. It is obvious that the idea of love as a distraction and a curse is the offspring of classicism. If poetry is the work of the reason, then equilibrium of soul, which is so sorely upset by passionate love, is doubtless very necessary. But the romanticist represents the poet, not as one drawing upon the resources within his mind, but as the vessel filled from without. His afflatus comes upon him and departs, without his control or understanding. Poetical inspiration, to such a temperament, naturally assumes the shape of passion. Bryant's expression of this point of view is so typical of the general attitude as to seem merely commonplace. He tells us, inThe Poet,
No smooth array of phrase,Artfully sought and ordered though it be,Which the cold rhymer laysUpon his page languid industryCan wake the listless pulse to livelier speed.* * * * *The secret wouldst thou knowTo touch the heart or fire the blood at will?Let thine own eyes o'erflow;Let thy lips quiver with the passionate thrill.Seize the great thought, ere yet its power be past,And bind, in words, the fleet emotion fast.
Coleridge's comprehension of this fact led him to cry, "Love is the vital air of my genius." [Footnote: Letter to his wife, March 12, 1799.]
All this, considering the usual subject-matter of poetry, is perhaps only saying that the poet must be sincere. The mathematician is most sincere when he uses his intellect exclusively, but a reasoned portrayal of passion is bound to falsify, for it leads one insensibly either to understate, or to burlesque, or to indulge in a psychopathic analysis of emotion. [Footnote: Of the latter type of poetry a good example is Edgar Lee Masters'Monsieur D—— and the Psycho-Analyst.]
Accordingly, our poets have not been slow to remind us of their passionate temperaments. Landor, perhaps, may oblige us to dip into his biography in order to verify our thesis that the poet is invariably passionate, but in many cases this state of things is reversed, the poet being wont to assure us that the conventional incidents of his life afford no gauge of the ardors within his soul. Thus Wordsworth solemnly assures us,
Had I been a writer of love poetry, it would have been natural to me to write with a degree of warmth which could hardly have been approved by my principles, and which might have been undesirable for the reader. [Footnote: See Arthur Symons,The Romantic Movement, p. 92 (from Myers,Life of Wordsworth).]
Such boasting is equally characteristic of our staid American poets, who shrink from the imputation that their orderly lives are the result of temperamental incapacity for unrestraint. [Footnote: Thus Whittier, inMy Namesake, says of himself,
Few guessed beneath his aspect graveWhat passions strove in chains.
Also Bayard Taylor retorts to those who taunt him with lack of passion,
But you are blind, and to the blindThe touch of ice and fire is one.
The same defense is made by Richard W. Gilder in lines entitledOur Elder Poets.] In differing mode, Swinburne's poetry is perhaps an expression of the same attitude. The ultra-erotic verse of that poet somehow suggests a wild hullabaloo raised to divert our attention from the fact that he was constitutionally incapable of experiencing passion.
Early in the century, something approaching the Wordsworthian doctrine of emotion recollected in tranquillity was in vogue, as regards capacity for passion. The Byronic hero is one whose affections have burned themselves out, and who employs the last worthless years of his life writing them up. Childe Harold is
Grown aged in this world of woe,In deeds, not years, piercing the depths of life,So that no wonder waits him, nor belowCan love, or sorrow, fame, ambition, strife,Cut to his heart again with the keen knifeOf silent, sharp endurance.
The very imitative hero of Praed'sThe Troubadour, after disappointment in several successive amours, at the age of twenty-six dismisses passion forever. We are assured that
The joys that wound, the pains that bless,Were all, were all departed,And he was wise and passionlessAnd happy and cold-hearted.
The popularity of this sort of poet was, however, ephemeral. Of late years poets have shown nothing but contempt for their brothers who attempt to sing after their passion has died away. It seems likely, beside, that instead of giving an account of his genius, the depleted poet depicts his passionless state only as a ruse to gain the sympathy of his readers, reminding them how much greater he might have been if he had not wantonly wasted his emotions.
One is justified in asking why, on the other hand, the poet should not be one who, instead of spending his love on a finite mistress, should devote it all to poetry. The bard asks us to believe that love of poetry is as thrilling a passion as any earthly one. His usual emotions are portrayed in Alexander Smith'sLife Drama, where the hero agonizes for relief from his too ardent love:
O that my heart was quiet as a grave Asleep in moonlight! For, as a torrid sunset boils with gold Up to the zenith, fierce within my soul A passion burns from basement to the cope. Poesy, poesy! But one who imagines that this passion can exist in the soul wholly unrelated to any other, is confusing poetry with religion, or possibly with philosophy. The medieval saint was pure in proportion as he died to the life of the senses. This is likewise the state of the philosopher described in thePhaedo. But beauty, unlike wisdom and goodness, is not to be apprehended abstractly; ideal beauty is super-sensual, to be sure, but the way to vision of it is through the senses. Without doubt one occasionally finds asceticism preached to the poet in verse. One of our minor American poets declares,
The bard who yields to flesh his emotionKnows naught of the frenzy divine.[Footnote:Passion, by Elizabeth Cheney. But compare Keats' protestagainst the poet's abstract love, in the fourth book ofEndymion.]
But this is not the genuine poet's point of view. In so far as he is a Platonist—and "all poets are more or less Platonists" [Footnote: H. B. Alexander,Poetry and the Individual, p. 46.]—the poet is led upward to the love of ideal beauty through its incarnations in the world of sense. Thus in one of the most Platonic of our poems, G. E. Woodberry'sAgathon, Eros says of the hero, who is the young poet of theSymposium,
A spirit of joy he is, to beauty vowed,Made to be loved, and every sluggish senseIn him is amorous and passionate.Whence danger is; therefore I seek him outSo with pure thought and care of things divineTo touch his soul that it partake the gods.
This does not imply that romantic love is the only avenue to ideal beauty. Rupert Brooke'sThe Great Lovermight dissipate such an idea, by its picture of childlike and omnivorous taste for sensuousbeauty.
These I have loved,
Brooke begins,
White plates and cups, clean gleaming,Ringed with blue lines; and feathery, faery dust;Wet roofs, beneath the lamplight; the strong crustOf friendly bread; and many tasting food;Rainbows, and the blue bitter smoke of wood.
And so on he takes us, apparently at random, through the whole range of his sense impressions. But the main difficulty with having no more than such scattered and promiscuous impressionability is that it is likely to result in poetry that is a mere confusion of color without design, unless the poet is subject to the unifying influence of a great passion, which, far from destroying perspective, as was hinted previously, affords a fixed standard by which to gauge the relative values of other impressions. Of course the exceptionally idealistic poet, who is conscious of a religious ideal, can say with Milton, "I am wont day and night to seek theideaof beauty through all the forms and faces of things (for many are the shapes of things divine) and to follow it leading me on with certain assured traces." [Footnote:Prose Works, Vol. I, Letter VII, Symmons ed.] To him there is no need of the unifying influence of romantic love. In his case the mission of a strong passion is rather to humanize the ideal, lest it become purely philosophical (as that of G. E. Woodberry is in danger of doing) or purely ethical, as is the case of our New England poets. On the other hand, to the poet who denies the ideal element in life altogether, the unifying influence of love is indispensable. Such deeply tragic poetry as that of James Thomson, B. V., for instance, which asserts Macbeth's conclusion that life is "a tale told by an idiot," is saved from utter chaos sufficiently to keep its poetical character, only because the memory of his dead love gives Thomson a conception of eternal love and beauty by which to gauge his hopeless despair.
In addition, our poets are wont to agree with their father Spenser that the beauty of a beloved person is not to be placed in the same class as the beauty of the world of nature. Spenser argues that the spiritual beauty of a lady, rather than her outward appearance, causes her lover's perturbation. He inquires:
Can proportion of the outward partMove such affection in the inward mindThat it can rob both sense and reason blind?Why do not then the blossoms of the field,Which are arrayed with much more orient hueAnd to the sense most daintie odors yield,Work like impression in the looker's view?[Footnote:An Hymne in Honour of Beautie.]
Modern theorists, who would no doubt despise the quaintly idealistic mode of Spenser's expression, yet express much the same view in asserting that romantic excitement is a stimulus which keys all the senses to a higher pitch, thus dispersing one's amorousness over all creation. The love celebrated in Brooke'sThe Great Lover, they declare, cannot be compared with that of his more conventional love poems, simply because the one love is the cause of the other. Such heightened sensuous impressionability is celebrated in much of our most beautiful love poetry of to-day, notably in Sara Teasdale's.
It may be that this intensity of perception engendered by love is its most poetical effect. Much verse pictures the poet as a flamelike spirit kindled by love to a preternaturally vivid apprehension of life for an instant, before love dies away, leaving him ashes. Again and again the analogy is pointed out between Shelley's spirit and the leaping flames that consumed his body. Josephine Preston Peabody's interpretation of Marlowe is of the same sort. In the drama of which Marlowe is the title-character, his fellow-dramatist, Lodge, is much worried when he learns of Marlowe's mad passion for a woman of the court.
Thou art a glorious madman,
Lodge exclaims,
Born to consume thyself anon in ashes,And rise again to immortality.
Marlowe replies,
Oh, if she cease to smile, as thy looks say,What if? I shall have drained my splendor downTo the last flaming drop! Then take me, darkness,And mirk and mire and black oblivion,Despairs that raven where no camp-fire is,Like the wild beasts. I shall be even blestTo be so damned.
Most often this conception of love's flamelike lightening of life for the poet is applied to Sappho. Many modern English poets picture her living "with the swift singing strength of fire." [Footnote: See Southey,Sappho; Mary Robinson (1758-1800),Sappho and Phaon; Philip Moren Freneau,Monument of Phaon; James Gates Percival,Sappho; Charles Kingsley,Sappho; Lord Houghton,A Dream of Sappho; Swinburne,On the Cliffs,Anactoria,Sapphics; Cale Young Rice,Sappho's Death Song; Sara Teasdale,Sappho; Percy Mackaye,Sappho and Phaon; Zoë Akins,Sappho to a Swallow on the Ground; James B. Kenyon,Phaon Concerning Sappho,Sappho(1920); William Alexander Percy,Sappho in Levkos(1920).] Swinburne, inOn the Cliffs, claims this as the essential attribute of genius, when he cries to her for sympathy,
For all my days as all thy days from birthMy heart as thy heart was in me as theeFire, and not all the fountains of the seaHave waves enough to quench it; nor on earthIs fuel enough to feed,While day sows night, and night sows day for seed.
This intensity of perception is largely the result, or the cause, of the poet's unusually sensitive consciousness of the ephemeralness of love. The notion of permanence often seems to rob love of all its poetical quality. The dark despair engendered by a sense of its transience is needed as a foil to the fiery splendors of passion. Thus Rupert Brooke, in the sonnet,Mutability, dismisses the Platonic idea of eternal love and beauty, declaring,
Dear, we know only that we sigh, kiss, smile;Each kiss lasts but the kissing; and grief goes over;Love has no habitation but the heart:Poor straws! on the dark flood we catch awhile,Cling, and are borne into the night apart,The laugh dies with the lips, "Love" with the lover.
Sappho is represented as especially aware of this aspect of her love.Her frenzies inAnactoria, where, if our hypothesis is correct,Swinburne must have been terribly concerned over his natural coldness,arise from rebellion at the brevity of love. Sappho cries,
What had all we doneThat we should live and loathe the sterile sun,And with the moon wax paler as she wanes,And pulse by pulse feel time grow through our veins?
Poetry, we are to believe, arises from the yearning to render eternal the fleeting moment of passion. Sappho's poetry is, as Swinburne says, [Footnote: InOn the Cliffs.] "life everlasting of eternal fire." In Mackaye'sSappho and Phaon, she exults in her power to immortalize her passion, contrasting herself with her mother, the sea:
Her ways are birth, fecundity and death,But mine are beauty and immortal love.Therefore I will be tyrant of myself—Mine own law will I be! And I will makeCreatures of mind and melody, whose formsAre wrought of loveliness without decay,And wild desire without satiety,And joy and aspiration without death.And on the wings of these shall I, I, Sappho!Still soar and sing above these cliffs of Lesbos,Even when ten thousand blooms of men and maidensAre fallen and withered.
To one who craves an absolute aesthetic standard, it is satisfactory to note how nearly unanimous our poets are in their portrayal of Sappho. [Footnote: No doubt they are influenced by the glimpse of her given in Longinus,On the Sublime.] This is the more remarkable, since our enormous ignorance of her life and poetry would give almost free scope to inventive faculty. It is significant that none of our writers have been attracted to the picture Welcker gives of her as the respectable matronly head of a girl's seminary. Instead, she is invariably shown as mad with an insatiable yearning, tortured by the conviction that her love can never be satisfied. Charles Kingsley, describing her temperament,
Night and dayA mighty hunger yearned within her heart,And all her veins ran fever,[Footnote:Sappho.]
conceives of her much as does Swinburne, who calls her,
Love's priestess, mad with pain and joy of song,Song's priestess, mad with pain and joy of love.[Footnote:On the Cliffs.]
It is in this insatiability that Swinburne finds the secret of her genius, as opposed to the meager desires of ordinary folk. Expressing her conception of God, he makes Sappho assert,
But having made me, me he shall not slay:Nor slay nor satiate, like those herds of his,Who laugh and love a little, and their kissContents them.
It is, no doubt, an inarticulate conviction that she is "imprisoned in the body as in an oyster shell," [Footnote: Plato,Phaedrus, § 250.] while the force that is wooing her is outside the boundary of the senses, that accounts for Sappho's agonies of despair. In Sara Teasdale'sSapphoshe describes herself,
Who would run at duskAlong the surges creeping up the shoreWhen tides come in to ease the hungry beach,And running, running till the night was black,Would fall forspent upon the chilly sand,And quiver with the winds from off the sea.Ah! quietly the shingle waits the tidesWhose waves are stinging kisses, but to meLove brought no peace, nor darkness any rest.[Footnote: In the end, Sara Teasdale does show her winning content,in the love of her baby daughter, but it is significant that thisdestroys her lyric gift. She assures Aphrodite,
If I sing no moreTo thee, God's daughter, powerful as God,It is that thou hast made my life too sweetTo hold the added sweetness of a song.* * * * *I taught the world thy music; now aloneI sing for her who falls asleep to hear.]
Swinburne characteristically shows her literally tearing the flesh in her quest of the divinity that is reflected there. InAnactoriashe tells the object of her infatuation:
I would my love could kill thee: I am satiatedWith seeing thee alive, and fain would have thee dead.* * * * *I would find grievous ways to have thee slain,Intense device and superflux of pain.
And after detailing with gusto the bloody ingenuities of her plan of torture, she states that her motive is,
To wring thy very spirit through the flesh.
The myth that Sappho's agony resulted from an offense done to Aphrodite, is several times alluded to. InSappho and Phaonshe asserts her independence of Aphrodite's good will, and in revenge the goddess turns Phaon's affection away from Sappho, back to Thalassa, the mother of his children. Sappho's infatuation for Phaon, the slave, seems a cruel jest of Aphrodite, who fills Sappho with a wholly blind and unreasoning passion. In all three of Swinburne's Lesbian poems, Aphrodite's anger is mentioned. This is the sole theme ofSapphics, in which poem the goddess, displeased by Sappho's preferment of love poetry to the actual delights of love, yet tried to win Sappho back to her:
Called to her, saying "Turn to me, O my Sappho,"Yet she turned her face from the Loves, she saw notTears or laughter darken immortal eyelids….Only saw the beautiful lips and fingers,Full of songs and kisses and little whispers,Full of music; only beheld among themSoar as a bird soarsNewly fledged, her visible song, a marvelMade of perfect sound and exceeding passion,Sweetly shapen, terrible, full of thunders,Clothed with the wind's wings.
It seems likely that this myth of Aphrodite's anger is an allegory indicating the tragic character of all poetic love, in that, while incarcerated in the body, the singer strives to break through the limits of the flesh and to grasp ideality. The issue is made clear in Mackaye's drama. There Sappho's rival is Thalassa, Phaon's slave-mate, who conceives as love's only culmination the bearing of children. Sappho, in her superiority, points out that mere perpetuation of physical life is a meaningless circle, unless it leads to some higher satisfaction. But in the end the figure of "the eternal mother," as typified by Thalassa, is more powerful than is Sappho, in the struggle for Phaon's love. Thus Aphrodite asserts her unwillingness to have love refined into a merely spiritual conception.
Often the greatest poets, as Sappho herself, are represented as having no more than a blind and instinctive apprehension of the supersensual beauty which is shining through the flesh, and which is the real object of desire. But thus much ideality must be characteristic of love, it seems obvious, before it can be spiritually creative. Unless there is some sense of a universal force, taking the shape of the individual loved one, there can be nothing suggestive in love. Instead of waking the lover to the beauty in all of life, as we have said, it would, as the non-lover has asserted, blind him to all but the immediate object of his pursuit. Then, the goal being reached, there would be no reason for the poet's not achieving complete satisfaction in love, for there would be nothing in it to suggest any delight that he does not possess. Therefore, having all his desire, the lover would be lethargic, with no impulse to express himself in song. Probably something of this sort is the meaning of the Tannhauser legend, as versified both by Owen Meredith and Emma Lazarus, showing the poet robbed of his gift when he comes under the power of the Paphian Venus. Such likewise is probably the meaning of Oscar Wilde's sonnet,Hélas, quoted above.