DETAILED CONTENTSPREFACEPASTORALS—Spring, the First Pastoral, or DamonSummer, the Second Pastoral, or AlexisAutumn, the Third Pastoral, or Hylas and ÆgonWinter, the Fourth Pastoral, or DaphneMESSIAHAN ESSAY ON CRITICISM—Part FirstPart SecondPart ThirdTHE RAPE OF THE LOCK—Canto I.Canto II.Canto III.Canto IV.Canto V.WINDSOR-FORESTODE ON ST CECILIA'S DAYTWO CHORUSES TO THE TRAGEDY OF BRUTUS—Chorus of AtheniansChorus of Youths and VirginsTO THE AUTHOR OF A POEM ENTITLED SUCCESSIOODE ON SOLITUDETHE DYING CHRISTIAN TO HIS SOULELEGY TO THE MEMORY OF AN UNFORTUNATE LADYPROLOGUE TO MR ADDISON'S TRAGEDY OF CATOIMITATIONS OF ENGLISH POETS—ChaucerSpenser—The Alley,Waller—Of a Lady Singing to her LuteOn a Fan of the Author's DesignCowley—The GardenWeepingEarl of Rochester—On SilenceEarl of Dorset—ArtemisiaPhryneDr Swift—The Happy Life of a Country ParsonTHE TEMPLE OF FAMEELOISA TO ABELARDEPISTLE TO ROBERT EARL OF OXFORD AND EARL MORTIMEREPISTLE TO JAMES CRAGGS, ESQ.EPISTLE TO MR JERVASEPISTLE TO MISS BLOUNTEPISTLE TO MRS TERESA BLOUNTTO MRS M.B. ON HER BIRTHDAYTO MR THOMAS SOUTHERN, ON HIS BIRTHDAY, 1742TO MR JOHN MOORETO MR C., ST JAMES'S PLACEEPITAPHS—On Charles Earl of DorsetOn Sir William TrumbullOn the Hon. Simon HarcourtOn James Craggs, Esq.Intended for Mr RoweOn Mrs CorbetOn the Monument of the Honourable Robert Digby, and his Sister MaryOn Sir Godfrey KnellerOn General Henry WithersOn Mr Elijah FentonOn Mr GayIntended for Sir Isaac NewtonOn Dr Francis AtterburyOn Edmund Duke of BuckinghamFor One who would not be Buried in Westminster AbbeyAnother, on the sameOn two Lovers struck dead by LightningAN ESSAY ON MAN—Epistle I.Epistle II.Epistle III.Epistle IV.EPISTLE TO DR AKBUTHNOT; OR, PROLOGUE TO THE SATIRESSATIRES AND EPISTLES OF HORACE IMITATED—Satire I. To Mr FortescueSatire II. To Mr BethelTHE FIRST EPISTLE OF THE FIRST BOOK OF HORACE—To Lord BolingbrokeTHE SIXTH EPISTLE OF THE FIRST BOOK OF HORACE—To Mr MurrayTHE FIRST EPISTLE OF THE SECOND BOOK OF HORACE—To AugustusTHE SECOND EPISTLE OF THE SECOND BOOK OF HORACE—Book I. Epistle VII.Book II. Satire VI.Book IV. Ode I.Part of the Ninth Ode of the Fourth BookTHE SATIRES OF DR JOHN VERSIFIED—Satire II.Satire IV.EPILOGUE TO THE SATIRES: IN TWO DIALOGUES—Dialogue I.Dialogue II.
I am inclined to think that both the writers of books, and the readers of them, are generally not a little unreasonable in their expectations. The first seem to fancy that the world must approve whatever they produce, and the latter to imagine that authors are obliged to please them at any rate. Methinks, as on the one hand, no single man is born with a right of controlling the opinions of all the rest; so, on the other, the world has no title to demand that the whole care and time of any particular person should be sacrificed to its entertainment. Therefore I cannot but believe that writers and readers are under equal obligations for as much fame, or pleasure, as each affords the other.
Every one acknowledges, it would be a wild notion to expect perfection in any work of man: and yet one would think the contrary was taken for granted, by the judgment commonly passed upon poems. A critic supposes he has done his part, if he proves a writer to have failed in an expression, or erred in any particular point: and can it then be wondered at, if the poets in general seem resolved not to own themselves in any error? For as long as one side will make no allowances, the other will be brought to no acknowledgments.
I am afraid this extreme zeal on both sides is ill-placed; poetry and criticism being by no means the universal concern of the world, but only the affair of idle men who write in their closets, and of idle men who read there.
Yet sure, upon the whole, a bad author deserves better usage than a bad critic; for a writer's endeavour, for the most part, is to please his readers, and he fails merely through the misfortune of an ill judgment; but such a critic's is to put them out of humour,—a design he could never go upon without both that and an ill temper.
I think a good deal may be said to extenuate the fault of bad poets. What we call a genius, is hard to be distinguished by a man himself from a strong inclination: and if his genius be ever so great, he cannot at first discover it any other way than by giving way to that prevalent propensity which renders him the more liable to be mistaken. The only method he has is to make the experiment by writing, and appealing to the judgment of others: now if he happens to write ill (which is certainly no sin in itself) he is immediately made an object of ridicule. I wish we had the humanity to reflect, that even the worst authors might, in their endeavour to please us, deserve something at our hands. We have no cause to quarrel with them but for their obstinacy in persisting to write; and this too may admit of alleviating circumstances. Their particular friends may be either ignorant or insincere; and the rest of the world in general is too well bred to shock them with a truth which generally their booksellers are the first that inform them of. This happens not till they have spent too much of their time to apply to any profession which might better fit their talents, and till such talents as they have are so far discredited as to be but of small service to them. For (what is the hardest case imaginable) the reputation of a man generally depends upon the first steps he makes in the world; and people will establish their opinion of us from what we do at that season when we have least judgment to direct us.
On the other hand, a good poet no sooner communicates his works with the same desire of information, but it is imagined he is a vain young creature given up to the ambition of fame; when perhaps the poor man is all the while trembling with the fear of being ridiculous. If he is made to hope he may please the world, he falls under very unlucky circumstances: for, from the moment he prints, he must expect to hear no more truth than if he were a prince, or a beauty. If he has not very good sense (and indeed there are twenty men of wit for one man of sense), his living thus in a course of flattery may put him in no small danger of becoming a coxcomb: if he has, he will consequently have so much diffidence as not to reap any great satisfaction from his praise; since, if it be given to his face, it can scarce be distinguished from flattery, and if in his absence, it is hard to be certain of it. Were he sure to be commended by the best and most knowing, he is as sure of being envied by the worst and most ignorant, which are the majority; for it is with a fine genius as with a fine fashion, all those are displeased at it who are not able to follow it: and it is to be feared that esteem will seldom do any man so much good as ill-will does him harm. Then there is a third class of people, who make the largest part of mankind, those of ordinary or indifferent capacities; and these (to a man) will hate, or suspect him: a hundred honest gentlemen will dread him as a wit, and a hundred innocent women as a satirist. In a word, whatever be his fate in poetry, it is ten to one but he must give up all the reasonable aims of life for it. There are indeed some advantages accruing from a genius to poetry, and they are all I can think of: the agreeable power of self-amusement when a man is idle or alone; the privilege of being admitted into the best company; and the freedom of saying as many careless things as other people, without being so severely remarked upon.
I believe, if any one, early in his life, should contemplate the dangerous fate of authors, he would scarce be of their number on any consideration. The life of a wit is a warfare upon earth; and the present spirit of the learned world is such, that to attempt to serve it (any way) one must have the constancy of a martyr, and a resolution to suffer for its sake. I could wish people would believe, what I am pretty certain they will not, that I have been much less concerned about fame than I durst declare till this occasion, when methinks I should find more credit than I could heretofore: since my writings have had their fate already, and it is too late to think of prepossessing the reader in their favour. I would plead it as some merit in me, that the world has never been prepared for these trifles by prefaces, biased by recommendations, dazzled with the names of great patrons, wheedled with fine reasons and pretences, or troubled with excuses. I confess it was want of consideration that made me an author; I writ because it amused me; I corrected because it was as pleasant to me to correct as to write; and I published because I was told I might please such as it was a credit to please. To what degree I have done this, I am really ignorant; I had too much fondness for my productions to judge of them at first, and too much judgment to be pleased with them at last. But I have reason to think they can have no reputation which will continue long, or which deserves to do so: for they have always fallen short, not only of what I read of others, but even of my own ideas of poetry.
If any one should imagine I am not in earnest, I desire him to reflect that the ancients (to say the least of them) had as much genius as we: and that to take more pains, and employ more time, cannot fail to produce more complete pieces. They constantly applied themselves not only to that art, but to that single branch of an art, to which their talent was most powerfully bent; and it was the business of their lives to correct and finish their works for posterity. If we can pretend to have used the same industry, let us expect the same immortality: though if we took the same care, we should still lie under a further misfortune: they writ in languages that became universal and everlasting, while ours are extremely limited both in extent and in duration. A mighty foundation for our pride! when the utmost we can hope is but to be read in one island, and to be thrown aside at the end of one age.
All that is left us is to recommend our productions by the imitation of the ancients; and it will be found true, that, in every age, the highest character for sense and learning has been obtained by those who have been most indebted to them. For, to say truth, whatever is very good sense must have been common sense in all times; and what we call learning is but the knowledge of the sense of our predecessors. Therefore they who say our thoughts are not our own, because they resemble the ancients, may as well say our faces are not our own, because they are like our fathers: and indeed it is very unreasonable that people should expect us to be scholars, and yet be angry to find us so.
I fairly confess that I have served myself all I could by reading; that I made use of the judgment of authors dead and living; that I omitted no means in my power to be informed of my errors, both by my friends and enemies: but the true reason these pieces are not more correct, is owing to the consideration how short a time they and I have to live: one may be ashamed to consume half one's days in bringing sense and rhyme together; and what critic can be so unreasonable as not to leave a man time enough for any more serious employment, or more agreeable amusement?
The only plea I shall use for the favour of the public is, that I have as great a respect for it as most authors have for themselves; and that I have sacrificed much of my own self-love for its sake, in preventing not only many mean things from seeing the light, but many which I thought tolerable. I would not be like those authors who forgive themselves some particular lines for the sake of a whole poem, andvice versâa whole poem for the sake of some particular lines. I believe no one qualification is so likely to make a good writer as the power of rejecting his own thoughts; and it must be this (if anything) that can give me a chance to be one. For what I have published, I can only hope to be pardoned; but for what I have burned, I deserve to be praised. On this account the world is under some obligation to me, and owes me the justice in return to look upon no verses as mine that are not inserted in this collection. And perhaps nothing could make it worth my while to own what are really so, but to avoid the imputation of so many dull and immoral things as, partly by malice, and partly by ignorance, have been ascribed to me. I must further acquit myself of the presumption of having lent my name to recommend any miscellanies or works of other men; a thing I never thought becoming a person who has hardly credit enough to answer for his own.
In this office of collecting my pieces, I am altogether uncertain whether to look upon myself as a man building a monument, or burying the dead. If time shall make it the former, may these poems (as long as they last) remain as a testimony that their author never made his talents subservient to the mean and unworthy ends of party or self-interest; the gratification of public prejudices or private passions; the flattery of the undeserving or the insult of the unfortunate. If I have written well, let it be considered that 'tis what no man can do without good sense,—a quality that not only renders one capable of being a good writer, but a good man. And if I have made any acquisition in the opinion of any one under the notion of the former, let it be continued to me under no other title than that of the latter.
But if this publication be only a more solemn funeral of my remains, I desire it may be known that I die in charity and in my senses, without any murmurs against the justice of this age, or any mad appeals to posterity. I declare I shall think the world in the right, and quietly submit to every truth which time shall discover to the prejudice of these writings; not so much as wishing so irrational a thing, as that every body should be deceived merely for my credit. However, I desire it may then be considered that there are very few things in this collection which were not written under the age of five-and-twenty: so that my youth may be made (as it never fails to be in executions) a case of compassion. That I was never so concerned about my works as to vindicate them in print; believing, if any thing was good, it would defend itself, and what was bad could never be defended. That I used no artifice to raise or continue a reputation, depreciated no dead author I was obliged to, bribed no living one with unjust praise, insulted no adversary with ill language: or, when I could not attack a rival's works, encouraged reports against his morals. To conclude, if this volume perish, let it serve as a warning to the critics, not to take too much pains for the future to destroy such things as will die of themselves; and amemento morito some of my vain cotemporaries the poets, to teach them that, when real merit is wanting, it avails nothing to have been encouraged by the great, commended by the eminent, and favoured by the public in general.
November 10, 1716.
After the words 'severely remarked on,' p. 2, l. 41, it followed thus—For my part, I confess, had I seen things in this view at first, the public had never been troubled either with my writings, or with this apology for them. I am sensible how difficult it is to speak of one's self with decency: but when a man must speak of himself, the best way is to speak truth of himself, or, he may depend upon it, others will do it for him. I'll therefore make this preface a general confession of all my thoughts of my own poetry, resolving with the same freedom to expose myself, as it is in the power of any other to expose them. In the first place, I thank God and nature that I was born with a love to poetry; for nothing more conduces to fill up all the intervals of our time, or, if rightly used, to make the whole course of life entertaining:Cantantes licet usque(minus via laedet). 'Tis a vast happiness to possess the pleasures of the head, the only pleasures in which a man is sufficient to himself, and the only part of him which, to his satisfaction, he can employ all day long. The Muses areamicae omnium horarum; and, like our gay acquaintance, the best company in the world as long as one expects no real service from them. I confess there was a time when I was in love with myself, and my first productions were the children of Self-Love upon Innocence. I had made an epic poem, and panegyrics on all the princes in Europe, and thought myself the greatest genius that ever was. I can't but regret those delightful visions of my childhood, which, like the fine colours we see when our eyes are shut, are vanished for ever. Many trials and sad experience have so undeceived me by degrees, that I am utterly at a loss at what rate to value myself. As for fame, I shall be glad of any I can get, and not repine at any I miss; and as for vanity, I have enough to keep me from hanging myself, or even from wishing those hanged who would take it away. It was this that made me write. The sense of my faults made me correct.
After the words 'angry to find us so,' p. 3, l. 36, occurred the following—In the first place I own that I have used my best endeavours to the finishing these pieces. That I made what advantage I could of the judgment of authors dead and living; and that I omitted no means in my power to be informed of my errors by my friends and by my enemies. And that I expect no favour on account of my youth, business, want of health, or any such idle excuses. But the true reason they are not yet more correct is owing to the consideration how short a time they and I have to live. A man that can expect but sixty years may be ashamed to employ thirty in measuring syllables and bringing sense and rhyme together. To spend our youth in pursuit of riches or fame, in hopes to enjoy them when we are old; and when we are old, we find it is too late to enjoy any thing. I therefore hope the wits will pardon me, if I reserve some of my time to save my soul; and that some wise men will be of my opinion, even if I should think a part of it better spent in the enjoyments of life than in pleasing the critics.
Rura mihi et rigui placeant in vallibus amnes, Flumina amem, sylvasque, inglorius!
There are not, I believe, a greater number of any sort of verses than of those which are called Pastorals; nor a smaller, than of those which are truly so. It therefore seems necessary to give some account of this kind of poem; and it is my design to comprise in this short paper the substance of those numerous dissertations the critics have made on the subject, without omitting any of their rules in my own favour. You will also find some points reconciled, about which they seem to differ, and a few remarks which, I think, have escaped their observation.
The original of poetry is ascribed to that age which succeeded the creation of the world: and as the keeping of flocks seems to have been the first employment of mankind, the most ancient sort of poetry was probablypastoral. It is natural to imagine, that the leisure of those ancient shepherds admitting and inviting some diversion, none was so proper to that solitary and sedentary life as singing; and that in their songs they took occasion to celebrate their own felicity. From hence a poem was invented, and afterwards improved to a perfect image of that happy time; which, by giving us an esteem for the virtues of a former age, might recommend them to the present. And since the life of shepherds was attended with more tranquility than any other rural employment, the poets chose to introduce their persons, from whom it received the name of "pastoral."
A pastoral is an imitation of the action of a shepherd, or one considered under that character. The form of this imitation is dramatic, or narrative, or mixed of both; the fable simple, the manners not too polite nor too rustic: the thoughts are plain, yet admit a little quickness and passion, but that short and flowing: the expression humble, yet as pure as the language will afford; neat, but not florid; easy and yet lively. In short, the fable, manners, thoughts, and expressions are full of the greatest simplicity in nature.
The complete character of this poem consists in simplicity, brevity, and delicacy; the two first of which render an eclogue natural, and the last delightful.
If we would copy nature, it may be useful to take this idea along with us, that pastoral is an image of what they call the Golden Age. So that we are not to describe our shepherds as shepherds at this day really are, but as they may be conceived then to have been, when the best of men followed the employment. To carry this resemblance yet further, it would not be amiss to give these shepherds some skill in astronomy, as far as it may be useful to that sort of life. And an air of piety to the gods should shine through the poem, which so visibly appears in all the works of antiquity: and it ought to preserve some relish of the old way of writing; the connexion should be loose, the narrations and descriptions short, and the periods concise. Yet it is not sufficient, that the sentences only be brief, the whole eclogue should be so too. For we cannot suppose poetry in those days to have been the business of men, but their recreation at vacant hours.
But with respect to the present age, nothing more conduces to make these composures natural than when some knowledge in rural affairs is discovered. This may be made to appear rather done by chance than on design, and sometimes is best shown by inference; lest by too much study to seem natural, we destroy that easy simplicity from whence arises the delight. For what is inviting in this sort of poetry, proceeds not so much from the idea of that business, as of the tranquility of a country life.
We must therefore use some illusion to render a pastoral delightful; and this consists in exposing the best side only of a shepherd's life, and in concealing its miseries. Nor is it enough to introduce shepherds discoursing together in a natural way; but a regard must be had to the subject—that it contain some particular beauty in itself, and that it be different in every eclogue. Besides, in each of them a designed scene or prospect is to be presented to our view, which should likewise have its variety. This variety is obtained in a great degree by frequent comparisons, drawn from the most agreeable objects of the country; by interrogations to things inanimate; by beautiful digressions, but those short; sometimes by insisting a little on circumstances; and lastly, by elegant turns on the words, which render the numbers extremely sweet and pleasing. As for the numbers themselves, though they are properly of the heroic measure, they should be the smoothest, the most easy and flowing imaginable.
It is by rules like these that we ought to judge of pastorals. And since the instructions given for any art are to be delivered as that art is in perfection, they must of necessity be derived from those in whom it is acknowledged so to be. It is therefore from the practice of Theocritus and Virgil (the only undisputed authors of pastoral) that the critics have drawn the foregoing notions concerning it.
Theocritus excels all others in nature and simplicity. The subjects of his 'Idyllia' are purely pastoral; but he is not so exact in his persons, having introduced reapers and fishermen as well as shepherds. He is apt to be too long in his descriptions, of which that of the cup in the first pastoral is a remarkable instance. In the manners he seems a little defective, for his swains are sometimes abusive and immodest, and perhaps too much inclining to rusticity; for instance, in his fourth and fifth 'Idyllia.' But 'tis enough that all others learnt their excellencies from him, and that his dialect alone has a secret charm in it, which no other could ever attain.
Virgil, who copies Theocritus, refines upon his original: and in all points where judgment is principally concerned, he is much superior to his master.
Though some of his subjects are not pastoral in themselves, but only seem to be such, they have a wonderful variety in them, which the Greek was a stranger to. He exceeds him in regularity and brevity, and falls short of him in nothing but simplicity and propriety of style; the first of which perhaps was the fault of his age, and the last of his language.
Among the moderns, their success has been greatest who have most endeavoured to make these ancients their pattern. The most considerable genius appears in the famous Tasso, and our Spenser. Tasso in his 'Aminta' has as far excelled all the pastoral writers, as in his 'Gierusalemme' he has outdone the epic poets of his country. But as this piece seems to have been the original of a new sort of poem—the pastoral comedy—in Italy, it cannot so well be considered as a copy of the ancients. Spenser's Calendar, in Mr Dryden's opinion, is the most complete work of this kind which any nation has produced ever since the time of Virgil. Not but that he may be thought imperfect in some few points. His Eclogues are somewhat too long, if we compare them with the ancients. He is sometimes too allegorical, and treats of matters of religion in a pastoral style, as the Mantuan had done before him. He has employed the lyric measure, which is contrary to the practice of the old poets. His stanza is not still the same, nor always well chosen. This last may be the reason his expression is sometimes not concise enough: for the Tetrastic has obliged him to extend his sense to the length of four lines, which would have been more closely confined in the couplet.
In the manners, thoughts, and characters, he comes near to Theocritus himself; though, notwithstanding all the care he has taken, he is certainly inferior in his dialect: for the Doric had its beauty and propriety in the time of Theocritus; it was used in part of Greece, and frequent in the mouths of many of the greatest persons: whereas the old English and country phrases of Spenser were either entirely obsolete, or spoken only by people of the lowest condition. As there is a difference betwixt simplicity and rusticity, so the expression of simple thoughts should be plain, but not clownish. The addition he has made of a Calendar to his Eclogues, is very beautiful; since by this, besides the general moral of innocence and simplicity, which is common to other authors of pastoral, he has one peculiar to himself—he compares human life to the several seasons, and at once exposes to his readers a view of the great and little worlds, in their various changes and aspects. Yet the scrupulous division of his pastorals into months has obliged him either to repeat the same description, in other words, for three months together; or, when it was exhausted before, entirely to omit it: whence it comes to pass that some of his Eclogues (as the sixth, eighth, and tenth, for example) have nothing but their titles to distinguish them. The reason is evident—because the year has not that variety in it to furnish every month with a particular description, as it may every season.
Of the following eclogues I shall only say, that these four comprehend all the subjects which the critics upon Theocritus and Virgil will allow to be fit for pastoral: that they have as much variety of description, in respect of the several seasons, as Spenser's: that, in order to add to this variety, the several times of the day are observed, the rural employments in each season or time of day, and the rural scenes or places proper to such employments; not without some regard to the several ages of man, and the different passions proper to each age.
But after all, if they have any merit, it is to be attributed to some good old authors, whose works as I had leisure to study, so I hope I have not wanted care to imitate.
First in these fields I try the sylvan strains,Nor blush to sport on Windsor's blissful plains:Fair Thames, flow gently from thy sacred spring,While on thy banks Sicilian Muses sing;Let vernal airs through trembling osiers play,And Albion's cliffs resound the rural lay.You that, too wise for pride, too good for power,Enjoy the glory to be great no more,And, carrying with you all the world can boast,To all the world illustriously are lost! 10Oh, let my Muse her slender reed inspire,Till in your native shades you tune the lyre:So when the nightingale to rest removes,The thrush may chant to the forsaken groves,But, charm'd to silence, listens while she sings,And all the aërial audience clap their wings.Soon as the flocks shook off the nightly dews,Two swains, whom Love kept wakeful, and the Muse,Pour'd o'er the whitening vale their fleecy care,Fresh as the morn, and as the season fair: 20The dawn now blushing on the mountain's side,Thus Daphnis spoke, and Strephou thus replied.DAPHNIS.Hear how the birds, on every bloomy spray,With joyous music wake the dawning day!Why sit we mute when early linnets sing,When warbling Philomel salutes the spring?Why sit we sad, when Phosphor5shines so clear,And lavish Nature paints the purple year?STREPHON.Sing then, and Damon shall attend the strain,While yon slow oxen turn the furrow'd plain. 30Here the bright crocus and blue violet glow;Here western winds on breathing roses blow.I'll stake yon lamb, that near the fountain plays,And from the brink his dancing shade surveys.DAPHNIS.And I this bowl, where wanton ivy twines,And swelling clusters bend the curling vines:Four Figures rising from the work appear,The various Seasons of the rolling year;And what is that, which binds the radiant sky,Where twelve fair signs in beauteous order lie? 40DAMON.Then sing by turns, by turns the Muses sing;Now hawthorns blossom, now the daisies spring;Now leaves the trees, and flowers adorn the ground:Begin, the vales shall every note rebound.STREPHON.Inspire me, Phoebus, in my Delia's praise,With Waller's strains, or Granville's moving lays!A milk-white bull shall at your altars stand,That threats a fight, and spurns the rising sand.DAPHNIS.O Love! for Sylvia let me gain the prize,And make my tongue victorious as her eyes; 50No lambs or sheep for victims I'll impart,Thy victim, Love, shall be the shepherd's heart.STREPHON.Me gentle Delia beckons from the plain,Then hid in shades, eludes her eager swain;But feigns a laugh, to see me search around,And by that laugh the willing fair is found.DAPHNIS.The sprightly Sylvia trips along the green,She runs, but hopes she does not run unseen;While a kind glance at her pursuer flies,How much at variance are her feet and eyes! 60STREPHON.O'er golden sands let rich Pactolus flow,And trees weep amber on the banks of Po;Blest Thames's shores the brightest beauties yield,Feed here, my lambs, I'll seek no distant field.DAPHNIS.Celestial Venus haunts Idalia's groves;Diana Cynthus, Ceres Hybla loves;If Windsor-shades delight the matchless maid,Cynthus and Hybla yield to Windsor-shade.STREPHON.All nature mourns, the skies relent in showers,Hush'd are the birds, and closed the drooping flowers; 70If Delia smile, the flowers begin to spring,The skies to brighten, and the birds to sing.DAPHNIS.All nature laughs, the groves are fresh and fair,The sun's mild lustre warms the vital air;If Sylvia smiles, new glories gild the shore,And vanquish'd Nature seems to charm no more.STREPHON.In spring the fields, in autumn hills I love,At morn the plains, at noon the shady grove,But Delia always; absent from her sight,Nor plains at morn, nor groves at noon delight. 80DAPHNIS.Sylvia's like autumn ripe, yet mild as May,More bright than noon, yet fresh as early day;Even spring displeases, when she shines not here;But, blest with her, 'tis spring throughout the year.STREPHON.Say, Daphnis, say, in what glad soil appears,A wondrous tree6that sacred monarchs bears?Tell me but this, and I'll disclaim the prize,And give the conquest to thy Sylvia's eyes.DAPHNIS.Nay, tell me first, in what more happy fieldsThe thistle7springs, to which the lily8yields? 90And then a nobler prize I will resign;For Sylvia, charming Sylvia shall be thine.DAMON.Cease to contend, for, Daphnis, I decree,The bowl to Strephon, and the lamb to thee:Blest swains, whose nymphs in every grace excel;Blest nymphs, whose swains those graces sing so well!Now rise, and haste to yonder woodbine bowers,A soft retreat from sudden vernal showers;The turf with rural dainties shall be crown'd.While opening blooms diffuse their sweets around. 100For see! the gath'ring flocks to shelter tend,And from the Pleiads fruitful showers descend.
VER. 36. And clusters lurk beneath the curling vines.VER. 49-52. Originally thus in the MS.—Pan, let my numbers equal Strephon's lays,Of Parian stone thy statue will I raise;But if I conquer and augment my fold,Thy Parian statue shall be changed to gold.VER. 61-64. It stood thus at first—Let rich Iberia golden fleeces boast,Her purple wool the proud Assyrian coast,Blest Thames's shores, &c.VER. 61-68 Originally thus in the MS.—Go, flowery wreath, and let my Sylvia know,Compared to thine how bright her beauties show;Then die; and dying teach the lovely maidHow soon the brightest beauties are decay'd.DAPHNIS.Go, tuneful bird, that pleased the woods so long,Of Amaryllis learn a sweeter song;To Heaven arising then her notes convey,For Heaven alone is worthy such a lay.VER 69-73. These verses were thus at first—All nature mourns, the birds their songs deny,Nor wasted brooks the thirsty flowers supply;If Delia smile, the flowers begin to spring,The brooks to murmur, and the birds to sing.VER. 99, 100, was originally—The turf with country dainties shall be spread,And trees with twining branches shade your head.
A shepherd's boy (he seeks no better name)Led forth his flocks along the silver Thame,Where dancing sunbeams on the waters play'd,And verdant alders form'd a quivering shade.Soft as he mourn'd, the streams forgot to flow,The flocks around a dumb compassion show:The Naïads wept in every watery bower,And Jove consented in a silent shower.Accept, O Garth9the Muse's early lays,That adds this wreath of ivy to thy bays; 10Hear what from love unpractised hearts endure:From love, the sole disease thou canst not cure.Ye shady beeches, and ye cooling streams,Defence from Phoebus', not from Cupid's beams,To you I mourn, nor to the deaf I sing,'The woods shall answer, and their echo ring.'10The hills and rocks attend my doleful lay;Why art thou prouder and more hard than they?The bleating sheep with my complaints agree,They parch'd with heat, and I inflamed by thee. 20The sultry Sirius burns the thirsty plains,While in thy heart eternal winter reigns.Where stray ye, Muses, in what lawn or grove,While your Alexis pines in hopeless love?In those fair fields where sacred Isis glides,Or else where Cam his winding vales divides?As in the crystal spring I view my face,Fresh rising blushes paint the watery glass;But since those graces please thy eyes no more,I shun the fountains which I sought before. 30Once I was skill'd in every herb that grew,And every plant that drinks the morning dew;Ah, wretched shepherd, what avails thy art,To cure thy lambs, but not to heal thy heart!Let other swains attend the rural care,Feed fairer flocks, or richer fleeces shear:But nigh yon mountain let me tune my lays,Embrace my love, and bind my brows with bays.That flute is mine which Colin's tuneful breathInspired when living, and bequeath'd in death; 40He said, 'Alexis, take this pipe—the sameThat taught the groves my Rosalinda's name:'But now the reeds shall hang on yonder tree,For ever silent, since despised by thee.Oh! were I made by some transforming powerThe captive bird that sings within thy bower!Then might my voice thy listening ears employ,And I those kisses he receives, enjoy.And yet my numbers please the rural throng,Rough Satyrs dance, and Pan applauds the song: 50The Nymphs, forsaking every cave and spring,Their early fruit, and milk-white turtles bring;Each amorous nymph prefers her gifts in vain.On you their gifts are all bestow'd again.For you the swains the fairest flowers design,And in one garland all their beauties join;Accept the wreath which you deserve alone,In whom all beauties are comprised in one.See what delights in sylvan scenes appear!Descending gods have found Elysium here. 60In woods bright Venus with Adonis stray'd,And chaste Diana haunts the forest shade.Come, lovely nymph, and bless the silent hours,When swains from shearing seek their nightly bowers,When weary reapers quit the sultry field,And crown'd with corn their thanks to Ceres yield;This harmless grove no lurking viper hides,But in my breast the serpent love abides.Here bees from blossoms sip the rosy dew,But your Alexis knows no sweets but you. 70Oh, deign to visit our forsaken seats,The mossy fountains, and the green retreats!Where'er you walk, cool gales shall fan the glade,Trees, where you sit, shall crowd into a shade:Where'er you tread, the blushing flowers shall rise,And all things flourish where you turn your eyes.Oh, how I long with you to pass my days,Invoke the Muses, and resound your praise!Your praise the birds shall chant in every grove,And winds shall waft it to the Powers above. 80But would you sing, and rival Orpheus' strain,The wondering forests soon should dance again,The moving mountains hear the powerful call,And headlong streams hang listening in their fall!But see, the shepherds shun the noonday heat,The lowing herds to murmuring brooks retreat,To closer shades the panting flocks remove;Ye gods! and is there no relief for love?But soon the sun with milder rays descendsTo the cool ocean, where his journey ends: 90On me Love's fiercer flames for ever prey,By night he scorches, as he burns by day.