APPENDIX

APPENDIXREPRESENTATION IN THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT[136]Although we know that burgesses were present at the Cambuskenneth Parliament, we possess no information as to what towns they represented. The first list of burghs in the Acts of Parliament refers to the Council held in 1357 to arrange about the ransom of King David II, and it includes the following towns:—Aberdeen, Crail, Cupar, Dumbarton, Dumfries, Dundee, Edinburgh, Haddington, Inverkeithing, Lanark, Linlithgow, Montrose, Perth, Peebles, Rutherglen, Stirling, and St. Andrews. From 1367, we have, occasionally, records of the election of burgesses to the Committee of the Articles, and these give us our only information regarding representation. (Cf. pp. 26-33.) We subjoin the first known date of the representation of any burgh at a regular meeting of the Estates in Parliament assembled. It must, of course, be understood that this list does not, in any way, pretend to completeness; the material is incomplete, and, in most cases when burghs are mentioned, up to the sixteenth century, it is only in connection with the Lords of the Articles.Fourteenth Century:—Aberdeen, Dundee, Montrose, Linlithgow, Perth, Edinburgh, Haddington (1367).Fifteenth Century:—Inverness (1439); Stirling (1449); St. Andrews, Cupar (1456); Lanark (1467); Peebles (1468); Elgin, Banff, Ayr, Irvine, Dumfries, Wigtown, Kirkcudbright, Selkirk, Jedburgh, Dunbar (1469); Forfar, Crail, Kinghorn, Inverkeithing, Dumbarton (1471); Brechin, Rutherglen, Renfrew, North Berwick (1478); Rothesay (1484); Forres (1488).Sixteenth Century:—Glasgow (1560); Tain, Nairn, Lauder (1567); Kintore, Pittenweem (1579); Kirkcaldy (1585); Burntisland (1586); Dingwall (1587); Cullen, Culross, E. and W. Anstruther (1593); Dysart (1594).Seventeenth Century:—Inverurie, Bervie, Kilrenny, Lochmaben, Annan (1612); Sanquhar (1621); Dunfermline, New Galloway (1628); Dornoch, Arbroath, Queensferry, Whithorn (1639); Fortrose, Inverary (1660); Kirkwall (1667); Stranraer (1685); Campbeltown (1689); Wick (1690).In addition to these, Berwick-on-Tweed was represented between 1469 and 1481, Cromarty from 1660-72, and Findhorn in 1648.Representation of the shires does not begin till 1593; but between that date and 1617, we find nearly all the counties represented. Argyleshire, however, does not appear till 1628, Sutherland not till 1633, and Kinross not till 1681.It gradually became usual for each burgh to send two members; but, in 1619, the Convention of Royal Burghs reduced the number to one, except in the case of Edinburgh. Under the Protectorate, Scotland was represented by twenty members for the shires and ten for the burghs, which, with the exception of Edinburgh, were divided into nine groups, each returning one member. Edinburgh, alone, returned two representatives. At the union of the Parliaments in 1707, Scotland received forty-five members. The burghs, except Edinburgh, were divided into fourteen groups, returning one member each, and one member was allotted to Edinburgh. It is to be remembered that only Royal Burghs had any representation in Scotland up to 1832, except in so far as burghs of barony were represented by the county members, along with the other freeholders of the country. When the town of Cromarty ceased to be a Royal Burgh, in 1672, it was excised from the parliamentary records. Of the remaining thirty members, each shire, except six, returned a member each. These six were divided into three groups,Bute and Caithness, Clackmannan and Kinross, and Nairn and Cromarty. The two shires which each group contained were given the right to return a member to alternate parliaments,e.g.Bute, Clackmannan, and Nairn in 1708, and Caithness, Kinross, and Cromarty in 1710.From these facts, various interesting conclusions can be drawn. The meagre nature of the evidence prevents our making any inferences of a constitutional nature; but the rise of the small burghs on the East coast in the end of the fifteenth century, throws considerable light upon the economic history of Scotland. It is also suggestive that the burgh of Inverary was not represented till 1660, and Argyleshire not till 1628. But such matters as these belong rather to the domain of political history, and do not fall within our province.

REPRESENTATION IN THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT[136]

Although we know that burgesses were present at the Cambuskenneth Parliament, we possess no information as to what towns they represented. The first list of burghs in the Acts of Parliament refers to the Council held in 1357 to arrange about the ransom of King David II, and it includes the following towns:—Aberdeen, Crail, Cupar, Dumbarton, Dumfries, Dundee, Edinburgh, Haddington, Inverkeithing, Lanark, Linlithgow, Montrose, Perth, Peebles, Rutherglen, Stirling, and St. Andrews. From 1367, we have, occasionally, records of the election of burgesses to the Committee of the Articles, and these give us our only information regarding representation. (Cf. pp. 26-33.) We subjoin the first known date of the representation of any burgh at a regular meeting of the Estates in Parliament assembled. It must, of course, be understood that this list does not, in any way, pretend to completeness; the material is incomplete, and, in most cases when burghs are mentioned, up to the sixteenth century, it is only in connection with the Lords of the Articles.

Fourteenth Century:—Aberdeen, Dundee, Montrose, Linlithgow, Perth, Edinburgh, Haddington (1367).

Fifteenth Century:—Inverness (1439); Stirling (1449); St. Andrews, Cupar (1456); Lanark (1467); Peebles (1468); Elgin, Banff, Ayr, Irvine, Dumfries, Wigtown, Kirkcudbright, Selkirk, Jedburgh, Dunbar (1469); Forfar, Crail, Kinghorn, Inverkeithing, Dumbarton (1471); Brechin, Rutherglen, Renfrew, North Berwick (1478); Rothesay (1484); Forres (1488).

Sixteenth Century:—Glasgow (1560); Tain, Nairn, Lauder (1567); Kintore, Pittenweem (1579); Kirkcaldy (1585); Burntisland (1586); Dingwall (1587); Cullen, Culross, E. and W. Anstruther (1593); Dysart (1594).

Seventeenth Century:—Inverurie, Bervie, Kilrenny, Lochmaben, Annan (1612); Sanquhar (1621); Dunfermline, New Galloway (1628); Dornoch, Arbroath, Queensferry, Whithorn (1639); Fortrose, Inverary (1660); Kirkwall (1667); Stranraer (1685); Campbeltown (1689); Wick (1690).

In addition to these, Berwick-on-Tweed was represented between 1469 and 1481, Cromarty from 1660-72, and Findhorn in 1648.

Representation of the shires does not begin till 1593; but between that date and 1617, we find nearly all the counties represented. Argyleshire, however, does not appear till 1628, Sutherland not till 1633, and Kinross not till 1681.

It gradually became usual for each burgh to send two members; but, in 1619, the Convention of Royal Burghs reduced the number to one, except in the case of Edinburgh. Under the Protectorate, Scotland was represented by twenty members for the shires and ten for the burghs, which, with the exception of Edinburgh, were divided into nine groups, each returning one member. Edinburgh, alone, returned two representatives. At the union of the Parliaments in 1707, Scotland received forty-five members. The burghs, except Edinburgh, were divided into fourteen groups, returning one member each, and one member was allotted to Edinburgh. It is to be remembered that only Royal Burghs had any representation in Scotland up to 1832, except in so far as burghs of barony were represented by the county members, along with the other freeholders of the country. When the town of Cromarty ceased to be a Royal Burgh, in 1672, it was excised from the parliamentary records. Of the remaining thirty members, each shire, except six, returned a member each. These six were divided into three groups,Bute and Caithness, Clackmannan and Kinross, and Nairn and Cromarty. The two shires which each group contained were given the right to return a member to alternate parliaments,e.g.Bute, Clackmannan, and Nairn in 1708, and Caithness, Kinross, and Cromarty in 1710.

From these facts, various interesting conclusions can be drawn. The meagre nature of the evidence prevents our making any inferences of a constitutional nature; but the rise of the small burghs on the East coast in the end of the fifteenth century, throws considerable light upon the economic history of Scotland. It is also suggestive that the burgh of Inverary was not represented till 1660, and Argyleshire not till 1628. But such matters as these belong rather to the domain of political history, and do not fall within our province.

Blackie & Son'sPublicationsThe Warwick Libraryof English LiteratureThe WarwickLibrary of English LiteratureGeneral Editor—Professor C. H. HERFORD, Litt.D.Each volume deals with the development in English literature ofsome special literary form, is illustrated by a series of representative specimens, slightly annotated, and preceded by a critical analytical introduction."In the 'Warwick Library' the editor has shown considerable skill in selecting for a special study by-ways of English literature, the developments of some special literary form. There is no other series which exactly covers the field here chosen, and some of the volumes are of considerable value to the student of English writing."—Literature.In crown 8vo volumes, decorated cloth boards, white edges, price 3s. 6d. eachEnglish Pastorals.Edited byEdmund K. Chambers, b.a., formerly Scholar of Corpus Christi College, Oxford."The idea of such a series has much to recommend it, and it is well carried out in this comely and attractive volume. In his introduction Mr. Chambers writes of the history and characteristics of the Pastoral with learning, insight, and sympathy."—The Times.English Literary Criticism.Edited byC. E. Vaughan, m.a., University College, Cardiff."The first volume,English Pastorals, met with a favourable reception, and the present volume by Professor Vaughan will certainly not impair the reputation of this useful series. Professor Vaughan in his introduction traces with ability and insight the development of sound principles of criticism."—The Times.English Essays.Edited byJ. H. Lobban, m.a., formerly Assistant Professor of English Literature in Aberdeen University."It is refreshing to find an editor who can write with just appreciation and without exaggerated praise. Mr. Lobban has accomplished his task with care and good judgment, the consequence is that he writes with a certain fulness, and seldom fails to interest his reader."—The Journal of Education.English Lyric Poetry (1500-1700 A.D.).Edited byFrederic Ives Carpenter, m.a., Lecturer in English Literature at Chicago University."This excellent addition to an excellent series deserves notice and commendation. The notes, literary and biographical, are notable for conciseness. The introduction is also a sound piece of criticism, tracing with great clearness the connection between the lyrical impulse and performance of particular periods and the national history."—The Spectator.English Masques.Edited byH. A. Evans, m.a., Balliol College, Oxford."Altogether a thoroughly useful book, which all students of dramatic literature will be glad to place on their shelves."—The Guardian."Mr. Evans prefixes an excellent introduction ... he has performed his task well."—Academy.English Satires.Edited byOliphant Smeaton, m.a."The book is scholarly and has all the attractions of its kind. The student who likes to be carried swiftly from century to century, from one old friend to another, will find here what he wants. He will be able to turn with all the pleasures of contrast from Chaucer to Dryden, from Swift to Browning, or from Sydney Smith to George Canning or Thackeray."—Literature.Blackie & Son'sPublicationsThe Warwick Libraryof English LiteratureThe Victorian Era SeriesThis series is designed to form a record of the great movements and developments of the age, in politics, economics, religion, industry, literature, science, and art, and of the life-work of its typical and influential men.In crown 8vo volumes, cloth, 2s. 6d. eachTennyson—A Critical Study.ByStephen Gwynn."It is in our opinion the best critical study of Tennyson that has been given to the public.... Taking the work as a whole we can only reiterate our praises, and reaffirm our opinion of its importance as an example of fine criticism, and as a contribution to the literature which has gathered round the poems of Tennyson."—Pall Mall Gazette.Recent Advances in Astronomy.ByA. H. Fison, D. Sc. (Lond.)."Mr. Fison gives a clearly comprehensive review of the most significant discoveries in astronomical science made during the Queen's reign."—Daily Mail.Charles Kingsley and the Christian Social Movement.By the Very Rev.C. W. Stubbs, D.D., Dean of Ely."The volume is decidedly interesting. The writer does full justice to Kingsley's nobility of purpose, and the ultimate recognition of his ideas of Christian duty."—Athenæum.The Science of Life.ByJ. Arthur Thomson, M.A. (Edin.)."No more welcome book could be placed in the hands of the student of the history of science or of thought than this little volume.... We heartily recommend the book."—Natural Science.Charles Dickens.ByGeorge Gissing."Its enthusiasm is tempered by a proper understanding of the deficiencies of the novelist, and yet the praise seems the sweeter and the more honest by reason of its coming from one who proves himself so discriminating and unbiased."—Birmingham Gazette.John Bright.ByC. A. Vince, M.A., Late Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge."This little book seems to us, in its way, a remarkable success. It is a model of what such a sketch should be—sober, well-written, with the matter well-ordered, and throughout a tone of judicial care not unmixed with enthusiasm."—Academy.Provident Societies and Industrial Welfare.ByE. W. Brabrook, C.B., F.S.A., Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies."Mr. Brabrook is obviously the right person to contribute to the Victorian Era Series a volume upon Provident Societies and Industrial Welfare, a task which he has just achieved with considerable success."—Literature.The Free-trade Movement and its Results.ByG. Armitage-Smith, M. A., Principal of the Birkbeck Institution."We have seldom met with a more complete though concise statement of fact and argument than Mr. Armitage-Smith has given us. On all points ... he seems to us convincing and satisfactory, and his hand-book should do much to convert doubters and to confirm believers."—Spectator.London in the Reign of Queen Victoria.ByG. Laurence Gomme, F.S.A."A concise volume packed with information, necessary for, but not otherwise easily attainable by, the Londoner who takes an interest in his city.... We are glad to have such a storehouse of facts collected by so well-known an authority on matters which must necessarily from year to year claim more and more urgent attention."—Literature.The Growth and Administration of the British Colonies. 1837-1897.By the Rev.W. P. Greswell, M.A."Anyone in search of a brief and rapid survey of British Colonial History will find in this compact volume exactly what he wants.... The little book is written with knowledge and discrimination, and is saved from being a mere catalogue by happy touches of generalization, which tell the reader where he stands in regard to the whole subject of colonization."—Outlook.The Anglican Revival.By Rev.J. H. Overton, D.D., Rector of Epworth and Canon of Lincoln."The Anglican Revival is a model of what such a book ought to be.... It bears on every page the distinction, undefinable but unmistakable, of being written by a man who knows thoroughly well what he is talking about."—Guardian.The Rise of Democracy.ByJ. Holland Rose, M.A."In dealing with his subject Mr. Rose displays considerable independence of thought, joined to accuracy of detail and clearness of exposition. His style, too, is vigorous; and on the whole he has made a good start for what promises to be a useful and instructive series."—Glasgow Herald.English National Education.ByH. Holman, M.A., formerly Professor of Education in University College of Wales, Aberystwyth."Public opinion seems to be slowly awakening to the importance of education. A book like this should assist the process by its clear account of previous failures and shortcomings, and its grasp of true principles."—Times.Victorian Novelists.ByJames Oliphant, M.A."This little work is one of the most thoughtful literary studies that we have read for some time."—Aberdeen Free Press.British Foreign Missions.By the Rev.Wardlaw Thompsonand the Rev.A. N. Johnson, M.A."The book gives a careful and admirable account of the growth and progress of British Foreign Missions during sixty years of the Queen's reign."—Literary World.The Earl of Beaconsfield.ByHarold E. Gorst."Mr. Gorst's interesting little volume will be especially welcome as forming a faithful record of the career of a great statesman, and, above all, a great Imperialist."—Telegraph.Blackie & Son'sPublicationsThe Warwick Libraryof English LiteratureOgilvie's Imperial DictionaryOf the English Language. A complete Encyclopedic Lexicon, Literary, Etymological, Scientific, Technological, and Pronouncing.ByJohn Ogilvie, LL.D.NEW EDITION. CAREFULLY REVISED AND GREATLY AUGMENTEDBy CHARLES ANNANDALE, M.A., LL.D."TheImperial Dictionaryis a work which fairly deserves the epithet of monumental. It is really what it professes to be—'a complete encyclopædic lexicon, literary, scientific, and technological'. In other words it is the best dictionary of its kind in the English language, and its kind is the best."—St. James's Gazette.The four volumes of the New Edition comprise a total of over 3000 pages. Of modern terms relating to science, technology, and the arts, a full collection will be found. Many colloquialisms, provincialisms, Americanisms, and a list of foreign words used by English writers are given. The discrimination of synonyms has been carefully attended to, while the etymology and pronunciation have been modelled on the latest authorities.As an Encyclopedic Dictionary theImperialcombines the advantages of an ordinary dictionary with those of an encyclopedia. And as there are many objects and terms of which no adequate description or definition can be given by mere words, this dictionary does not rely upon verbal description alone, the definitions being supplemented by upwards of 3000 accurate and beautiful wood engravings.In 4 vols, imperial 8vo. Cloth, £4 nett; or half-morocco, £5 nettThe Timessays:—"So far as vocabulary and treatment are concerned, we should not wish for anything better than the newImperial. The definitions are accurate and intelligible, developing into detailed explanations where necessary. The etymology is clear and concise, and the illustrations are copious, appropriate, and well executed."The Spectatorsays:—"a laborious enterprise, for which we have only words of cordial praise.... It is the best English Lexicon of the time."The Student's English DictionaryLiterary, Scientific, Etymological, and Pronouncing. ByJohn Ogilvie, LL.D.New Edition, thoroughly revised and greatly augmented, edited byCharles Annandale, m.a., ll.d.With extensive Appendices. Illustrated by nearly 800 Engravings on Wood. Large f'cap 4to, 872 pages. Cloth, red edges, 7s.6d.; half-Persian, 10s.6d.; half-morocco flexible, 12s.6d.The Athenæumsays:—"The book is issued at a surprisingly low price. The woodcuts are remarkably well executed. Leaving out of account the unwieldy and expensive recent editions of Webster and Worcester, we have no hesitation in saying that this is by far the most useful one-volume English dictionary at present existing."The St. James's Gazettesays:—"One of the commonest questions asked us by people is, 'Can you tell us of a good English dictionary?'.... For a 'good all-round', family reference dictionary, it would be hard to beat Ogilvie's."English EtymologyA select glossary, serving as an introduction to the history of the English language. ByF. KlugeandF. Lutz. Demy 8vo, cloth, 5s.nett.Prof. C. H. Herford, Litt.D.,says: "Kluge and Lutz ... ought to have a good sale in England, being unquestionably the most scientific book of English philology and derivation accessible to the English reader; it at the same time covers the whole field of the alphabet."

The WarwickLibrary of English Literature

General Editor—Professor C. H. HERFORD, Litt.D.

Each volume deals with the development in English literature ofsome special literary form, is illustrated by a series of representative specimens, slightly annotated, and preceded by a critical analytical introduction.

"In the 'Warwick Library' the editor has shown considerable skill in selecting for a special study by-ways of English literature, the developments of some special literary form. There is no other series which exactly covers the field here chosen, and some of the volumes are of considerable value to the student of English writing."—Literature.

In crown 8vo volumes, decorated cloth boards, white edges, price 3s. 6d. each

English Pastorals.Edited byEdmund K. Chambers, b.a., formerly Scholar of Corpus Christi College, Oxford.

"The idea of such a series has much to recommend it, and it is well carried out in this comely and attractive volume. In his introduction Mr. Chambers writes of the history and characteristics of the Pastoral with learning, insight, and sympathy."—The Times.

English Literary Criticism.Edited byC. E. Vaughan, m.a., University College, Cardiff.

"The first volume,English Pastorals, met with a favourable reception, and the present volume by Professor Vaughan will certainly not impair the reputation of this useful series. Professor Vaughan in his introduction traces with ability and insight the development of sound principles of criticism."—The Times.

English Essays.Edited byJ. H. Lobban, m.a., formerly Assistant Professor of English Literature in Aberdeen University.

"It is refreshing to find an editor who can write with just appreciation and without exaggerated praise. Mr. Lobban has accomplished his task with care and good judgment, the consequence is that he writes with a certain fulness, and seldom fails to interest his reader."—The Journal of Education.

English Lyric Poetry (1500-1700 A.D.).Edited byFrederic Ives Carpenter, m.a., Lecturer in English Literature at Chicago University.

"This excellent addition to an excellent series deserves notice and commendation. The notes, literary and biographical, are notable for conciseness. The introduction is also a sound piece of criticism, tracing with great clearness the connection between the lyrical impulse and performance of particular periods and the national history."—The Spectator.

English Masques.Edited byH. A. Evans, m.a., Balliol College, Oxford.

"Altogether a thoroughly useful book, which all students of dramatic literature will be glad to place on their shelves."—The Guardian.

"Mr. Evans prefixes an excellent introduction ... he has performed his task well."—Academy.

English Satires.Edited byOliphant Smeaton, m.a.

"The book is scholarly and has all the attractions of its kind. The student who likes to be carried swiftly from century to century, from one old friend to another, will find here what he wants. He will be able to turn with all the pleasures of contrast from Chaucer to Dryden, from Swift to Browning, or from Sydney Smith to George Canning or Thackeray."—Literature.

The Victorian Era Series

This series is designed to form a record of the great movements and developments of the age, in politics, economics, religion, industry, literature, science, and art, and of the life-work of its typical and influential men.

In crown 8vo volumes, cloth, 2s. 6d. each

Tennyson—A Critical Study.ByStephen Gwynn.

"It is in our opinion the best critical study of Tennyson that has been given to the public.... Taking the work as a whole we can only reiterate our praises, and reaffirm our opinion of its importance as an example of fine criticism, and as a contribution to the literature which has gathered round the poems of Tennyson."—Pall Mall Gazette.

Recent Advances in Astronomy.ByA. H. Fison, D. Sc. (Lond.).

"Mr. Fison gives a clearly comprehensive review of the most significant discoveries in astronomical science made during the Queen's reign."—Daily Mail.

Charles Kingsley and the Christian Social Movement.By the Very Rev.C. W. Stubbs, D.D., Dean of Ely.

"The volume is decidedly interesting. The writer does full justice to Kingsley's nobility of purpose, and the ultimate recognition of his ideas of Christian duty."—Athenæum.

The Science of Life.ByJ. Arthur Thomson, M.A. (Edin.).

"No more welcome book could be placed in the hands of the student of the history of science or of thought than this little volume.... We heartily recommend the book."—Natural Science.

Charles Dickens.ByGeorge Gissing.

"Its enthusiasm is tempered by a proper understanding of the deficiencies of the novelist, and yet the praise seems the sweeter and the more honest by reason of its coming from one who proves himself so discriminating and unbiased."—Birmingham Gazette.

John Bright.ByC. A. Vince, M.A., Late Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge.

"This little book seems to us, in its way, a remarkable success. It is a model of what such a sketch should be—sober, well-written, with the matter well-ordered, and throughout a tone of judicial care not unmixed with enthusiasm."—Academy.

Provident Societies and Industrial Welfare.ByE. W. Brabrook, C.B., F.S.A., Chief Registrar of Friendly Societies.

"Mr. Brabrook is obviously the right person to contribute to the Victorian Era Series a volume upon Provident Societies and Industrial Welfare, a task which he has just achieved with considerable success."—Literature.

The Free-trade Movement and its Results.ByG. Armitage-Smith, M. A., Principal of the Birkbeck Institution.

"We have seldom met with a more complete though concise statement of fact and argument than Mr. Armitage-Smith has given us. On all points ... he seems to us convincing and satisfactory, and his hand-book should do much to convert doubters and to confirm believers."—Spectator.

London in the Reign of Queen Victoria.ByG. Laurence Gomme, F.S.A.

"A concise volume packed with information, necessary for, but not otherwise easily attainable by, the Londoner who takes an interest in his city.... We are glad to have such a storehouse of facts collected by so well-known an authority on matters which must necessarily from year to year claim more and more urgent attention."—Literature.

The Growth and Administration of the British Colonies. 1837-1897.By the Rev.W. P. Greswell, M.A.

"Anyone in search of a brief and rapid survey of British Colonial History will find in this compact volume exactly what he wants.... The little book is written with knowledge and discrimination, and is saved from being a mere catalogue by happy touches of generalization, which tell the reader where he stands in regard to the whole subject of colonization."—Outlook.

The Anglican Revival.By Rev.J. H. Overton, D.D., Rector of Epworth and Canon of Lincoln.

"The Anglican Revival is a model of what such a book ought to be.... It bears on every page the distinction, undefinable but unmistakable, of being written by a man who knows thoroughly well what he is talking about."—Guardian.

The Rise of Democracy.ByJ. Holland Rose, M.A.

"In dealing with his subject Mr. Rose displays considerable independence of thought, joined to accuracy of detail and clearness of exposition. His style, too, is vigorous; and on the whole he has made a good start for what promises to be a useful and instructive series."—Glasgow Herald.

English National Education.ByH. Holman, M.A., formerly Professor of Education in University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.

"Public opinion seems to be slowly awakening to the importance of education. A book like this should assist the process by its clear account of previous failures and shortcomings, and its grasp of true principles."—Times.

Victorian Novelists.ByJames Oliphant, M.A.

"This little work is one of the most thoughtful literary studies that we have read for some time."—Aberdeen Free Press.

British Foreign Missions.By the Rev.Wardlaw Thompsonand the Rev.A. N. Johnson, M.A.

"The book gives a careful and admirable account of the growth and progress of British Foreign Missions during sixty years of the Queen's reign."—Literary World.

The Earl of Beaconsfield.ByHarold E. Gorst.

"Mr. Gorst's interesting little volume will be especially welcome as forming a faithful record of the career of a great statesman, and, above all, a great Imperialist."—Telegraph.

Ogilvie's Imperial Dictionary

Of the English Language. A complete Encyclopedic Lexicon, Literary, Etymological, Scientific, Technological, and Pronouncing.

ByJohn Ogilvie, LL.D.NEW EDITION. CAREFULLY REVISED AND GREATLY AUGMENTEDBy CHARLES ANNANDALE, M.A., LL.D.

"TheImperial Dictionaryis a work which fairly deserves the epithet of monumental. It is really what it professes to be—'a complete encyclopædic lexicon, literary, scientific, and technological'. In other words it is the best dictionary of its kind in the English language, and its kind is the best."—St. James's Gazette.

The four volumes of the New Edition comprise a total of over 3000 pages. Of modern terms relating to science, technology, and the arts, a full collection will be found. Many colloquialisms, provincialisms, Americanisms, and a list of foreign words used by English writers are given. The discrimination of synonyms has been carefully attended to, while the etymology and pronunciation have been modelled on the latest authorities.

As an Encyclopedic Dictionary theImperialcombines the advantages of an ordinary dictionary with those of an encyclopedia. And as there are many objects and terms of which no adequate description or definition can be given by mere words, this dictionary does not rely upon verbal description alone, the definitions being supplemented by upwards of 3000 accurate and beautiful wood engravings.

In 4 vols, imperial 8vo. Cloth, £4 nett; or half-morocco, £5 nett

The Timessays:—"So far as vocabulary and treatment are concerned, we should not wish for anything better than the newImperial. The definitions are accurate and intelligible, developing into detailed explanations where necessary. The etymology is clear and concise, and the illustrations are copious, appropriate, and well executed."

The Spectatorsays:—"a laborious enterprise, for which we have only words of cordial praise.... It is the best English Lexicon of the time."

The Student's English Dictionary

Literary, Scientific, Etymological, and Pronouncing. ByJohn Ogilvie, LL.D.New Edition, thoroughly revised and greatly augmented, edited byCharles Annandale, m.a., ll.d.With extensive Appendices. Illustrated by nearly 800 Engravings on Wood. Large f'cap 4to, 872 pages. Cloth, red edges, 7s.6d.; half-Persian, 10s.6d.; half-morocco flexible, 12s.6d.

The Athenæumsays:—"The book is issued at a surprisingly low price. The woodcuts are remarkably well executed. Leaving out of account the unwieldy and expensive recent editions of Webster and Worcester, we have no hesitation in saying that this is by far the most useful one-volume English dictionary at present existing."

The St. James's Gazettesays:—"One of the commonest questions asked us by people is, 'Can you tell us of a good English dictionary?'.... For a 'good all-round', family reference dictionary, it would be hard to beat Ogilvie's."

English Etymology

A select glossary, serving as an introduction to the history of the English language. ByF. KlugeandF. Lutz. Demy 8vo, cloth, 5s.nett.

Prof. C. H. Herford, Litt.D.,says: "Kluge and Lutz ... ought to have a good sale in England, being unquestionably the most scientific book of English philology and derivation accessible to the English reader; it at the same time covers the whole field of the alphabet."

FOOTNOTES:[1]The later volumes of the Privy Council Register, under the editorship of Professor Masson and Mr. P. Hume Brown, deal with the period immediately before and after the Union of the Crowns, and so do not fall within our subject.[2]On this subject, cf. Maitland,Domesday Book and Beyond, pp. 226-244.[3]After the Union of the Crowns, the sources of information became very much more numerous, and the subject has been treated with much greater fulness. The work of Professor Masson, Mr. Gardiner, and Mr. Firth on the period between 1603 and 1660 has placed the constitutional history of Scotland for that period in a position quite different from that which it occupies in the centuries preceding the Union.[4]Opera Geographica et historica, edition of 1707, p. 318.[5]Spanish Calendar, i, 210.[6]History of English Law, vol. i, pp. 222-224 (1st edn., pp. 201-203).[7]Cf. Pitscottie'sChronicles of Scotland, vol. ii, p. 477. Scottish Text Soc. Edn., ed. Aeneas Mackay. Sheriff Mackay's notes are specially valuable from the legal stand-point, and his edition gives a new importance to Pitscottie's work.[8]Cf. Hill Burton's Introduction to the Privy Council Register, vol. ii.[9]Baron Hume, quoted in Renton'sEncyclopaedia of the Laws of England, vol. xi, p. 402.[10]History of King James the Sext, p. 88 (Bannatyne Club ed.).[11]Diurnal of Occurrents in Scotland, p. 76 (Bannatyne Club).[12]Aikman,Buchanan, i. 437. Buchanan is the source of the whole constitutional myth. The second founder of the legend was George Ridpath, who published, anonymously, in 1703,An Historical Account of the Ancient Rights and Power of the Parliament of Scotland. This brilliant and ingenious political tract is based on Buchanan, who is always the real, and frequently the avowed, authority for Ridpath's view; and by Ridpath, in turn, many more recent writers have been influenced.[13]Innes,Critical Essay, i. 361-95.[14]For a typical instance of this cf. Boece,Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen(New Spalding Club ed.), pp. 112-13.[15]Pedro de Ayala, writing to Ferdinand and Isabella in July, 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. 210), divides the revenue of James IV into six main heads—(1) Leases of Crown lands, held for three years and redeemable by a fine. (2) Customs. "The import duties are insignificant, but the exports yield a considerable sum of money, because there are three principal articles of export, that is to say, wood, hides, and fish." (3) The profits of justice. James's predecessors "farmed it to certain persons called justices.... This king does not like to farm the administration of the law, because justice is not well administered in that way." (4) The ordinary feudal incidents—reliefs, wardships, and marriage. (5) Vacant bishoprics, abbacies, &c. (6) Rent in kind, from meat and poultry, and especially from fisheries. Only one of these, namely, customs duties, could have been regulated by the Estates, and there is on record no instance of any attempt to do so. The revenue was collected on the English system, described in theDialogus de Scaccario. The sheriffs and the king's stewards collected the sums due in the counties, and the bailiffs and "custumars" had charge of the amercement of the burghs and the collection of the customs. The main differences between the system in Scotland under James IV and that of England under Henry VII is that the Scottish Exchequer Court was not so fully organized as the English, and that the system of checks on the honesty of the sheriffs, &c., was much less elaborate. All the sources of revenue were, as a rule, "farmed out"; the king received a composition, and the actual collector made as much profit as he could.[16]Gilbert Stuart,Of the Public Law and Constitution of Scotland, note xxviii.[17]Hill Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 82.[18]The evidence upon which the theory of popular representation is based is as vague as the theory itself. Eadmer (Hist. Nov.p. 97, Lond. 1623; cf. also p. 134) tells us of an election, in 1107, of a bishop of St. Andrews "by Alexander, king of Scotland, the clergy, and the people." The Book of Scone (Liber de Scon.p. 1) describes the re-foundation of the abbey in 1114-15 by King Alexander. It is confirmed by his wife and nephew, several bishops, and a number of nobles, "consilio proborum hominum." Ten years later, at the foundation of the abbey of Dunfermline (Registrum de Dunfermelyn, p. 3; cf. also the Charters of Holyrood), we find a phrase employed to which some importance has been attached. Bishops and nobles confirm as usual, but with the acquiescence of the people and clergy. The form "clero etiam acquiescente et populo" is of frequent occurrence. The phrase "all the community of the kingryk" has been treated in the text. The similar phrases "probi homines" and "clero acquiescente et populo" are simply common technical terms belonging to the Chancery imitated by the Scottish scribe. The latter does not even imply consultation, and the former means the smaller tenants-in-chief. In theLaws of the Burghswe find it used for the leading men—theoptimates—of the town. It is not a popular term at all. On the other hand, too, we have councils described in quite different terms. In 1174 William the Lion held a council at Stirling, and asked an aid from his "optimates" (Fordun, viii. 73). In 1190 the "prelati et proceres" of Scotland gave the king 10,000 marks (Fordun, viii. 62). On the death of Alexander III the guardians describe themselves as "de communi consilio constituti" (Hist. Doc. relating to Scotland, i. 95), while Rishanger tells how "omnes Scoti" chose Wallace. The change in the political circumstances is sufficient to account for whatever importance may be attached to the words. It is true that Fordun, speaking of the same period, frequently uses the word Estates ("communitates"). But Fordun was not a contemporary, and the word had acquired a technical meaning by his time. Moreover, he uses the word very loosely. Sometimes he intends by it the land itself, as when he tells us how the English ravaged it.[19]Acts of the Parliament of Scotland, i. 371, &c.[20]Ibid.i. 377. The use of the word "community" appealed more strongly than anything else to the older historians.[21]Cf.Ancient Laws of the Burghs of Scotland(Burgh Record Soc.).[22]So important was their meeting that when Edward I of England held a parliament at Newcastle in 1292, and some question arose regarding their privileges, the four burghs were consulted, and the decision was made in conformity with their laws and customs (Rot. Parl., i. 107).[23]Fordun, viii. I.[24]Thoughts on the Origin of Feudal Tenures and the Descent of Ancient Peerages in Scotland, by George Wallace, 1783.[25]E.g.Wigton in 1342, and Sutherland in 1347.[26]Wallace,op. cit., p. 163.[27]Wallace,op. cit., p. 192, &c.[28]Robertson,Hist. of Scotland, App. iv. The claim is not based upon any constitutional right or theory. It is stated as a matter founded on common sense, and the efficacy of the petition lay in the support of those who had special reasons for desiring the presence of the smaller barons. The language of Randolph's letter shows how far the strictly legal position was from being understood.[29]Foreign Calendar, 19th Aug., 1560; Laing,Knox, vi. 116.[30]Cf. Innes,Legal Antiquities, p. 116.[31]Charters of the Burgh of Aberdeen, ed. P. J. Anderson; also in the Spalding Club edition of Gordon'sDescription of Aberdeen.[32]Innes,op. cit., p. 116.[33]Acts, vol. i. References to acts when no authority is quoted are always from the volumes ofActs of the Parliaments of Scotland.[34]Acts, i. 492. We have no reason for supposing that "proceres" included burgesses, as it is generally used in contradistinction to them.[35]"Plebanos, qui ad parliamentum non erunt, nec voluerint promittere interesse ibidem."[36]Although the burgesses had thus successfully asserted their right to a place in Parliament, the theory was not at once extended to the meetings known as conventions, which could impose taxes, and possessed every parliamentary power except that of passing general laws. In 1503 an act was passed, ordering that "commissioners and head men of burghs be warned" to attend conventions; but it had to be re-enacted in 1563, and even after that date it was not completely operative. Between 1566 (the first date of their recorded presence) and the end of the sixteenth century burgesses were present at only half of the conventions which were held. It is important to note that the royal burghs alone had parliamentary representation up to the year 1832.[37]We have no evidence that the Court of the Four Burghs was in any sense strictly representative.[38]The possible objection that a similar theory of burghal representation has been stated and rejected by English constitutional historians is scarcely applicable. For it is agreed that the idea of representation existed in England before the towns were summoned to Parliament, while in Scotland no such idea is traceable, nor are there any writs such as were issued for the English towns. It might even be argued that, in strict theory, there was no representation in Scotland till 1832; that commissioners both from shires and burghs only saved their fellows the trouble of attendance, the right to attend being, notde factobut in ultimate theory, possessed by all who were entitled to vote. Such a statement is certainly true of the shire, at all events.[39]The chief officers of state were the lord chancellor, the lord high treasurer, and the lord privy seal, who took precedence of all the nobility; the secretary, the clerk of register, the king's advocate, the treasurer's deputy, and the lord justice clerk.[40]They were excluded from 1640 to 1662.[41]Acts, i. 491. The use of the term in connection with the coronation of Alexander II in 1214 (Acts, i. 67) is explained by its being simply a quotation from Fordun (ix. 1).[42]Cf.supra, pp. 21-25.[43]Cf.supra, pp. 25-26.[44]Cf.supra, pp. 18-19.[45]Videsupra, p. 24.[46]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.[47]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.[48]The right of prorogation is tacitly assumed by the king in this speech. It was the cause of a dispute in the troublous times which followed 1638. The Parliament of 1640 protested that "Johne, Erle of Traquair, his Majestie's Commissioner, did take upon him without consent of the Estates, upon a private warrand, procured by himself, against his Majestie's publict patent, under the great seall," to prorogue Parliament. They therefore continued to sit, and took up stronger ground, viz. that prorogation without consent of Parliament was "against the lawes and libertie of the kingdom, ... without precedent, example, and practice." The language is clearly taken from the contemporary protests of the English Commons, and it cannot be regarded as more than a political weapon, borrowed for this occasion from the English constitutional armoury. It in no way corresponds with the general state of feeling in Scotland. In 1661 the Estates resolved that "the King hath sole power to call and prorogue Parliaments." Both resolutions were recognitions of fact, not of theory. At various times, from 1398 onwards, acts were passed that Parliament should meet once a year. These were probably connected with the judicial powers of the Estates. In point of fact, they were dead letters.[49]Convocatis tribus communitatibus Regni ... certi personae electi fuerunt per easdem ad parliamentum tenendum, data aliis causa autumpni licencia ad propria redeundi.[50]De concessu et confirmatione trium communitatum congregatarum, propter importunitatem et caristiam temporis ... electi fuerunt certi personae ad ipsum parliamentum tenendum, data licencia aliis remeandi.[51]Acts, i. 173.[52]Imitando videlicet ordinem illum et modum qui servabantur in parliamento tento apud Perth tempore venerandae memoriae domini Regis David, anno Regni ipsius quadragesimo [1369], electi fuerunt quidam....[53]Ad tractandum et deliberandum super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis, antequam perveniant ad noticiam consilii generalis, licentiatis autem aliis ut recedant.[54]De consensu et assensu trium communitatum per presidentes sive per personas electas ad determinationem negociorum in parliamento eodem.[55]Primo et principaliter, iuxta predictos modum et ordinem, est ordinatum quod nullus electus ad consilium cuiuscunque conditionis gradus pre-eminentiae sive status alium non electum ad consilium seu in consilio Regis sibi consiliarium vel assessorem aut alia de causa adducat.[56]"Comparentibus tribus Regni statibus apud Edinburgh, omnes comites nobiles et barones ac libere tenentes dicti regni...." The omission of the burgesses seems to have attracted the attention of Sir John Skene, who in his edited volume of theActs(temp. Jac. VI) includes the formal revocation in the proceedings of the Parliament of 1437-38, and prints, instead of the somewhat less emphatic words of the original, a statement that the revocation was sanctioned by "the haill three Estates of the Realme, sittand in plane Parliament, that is to say, the Clergie, Barrones, and Commissioners of Burrowes."[57]In 1445, three burgesses, along with fifteen of the clergy and barons, attest the erection of the lordship of Hamilton; but there is no further evidence of their being present or taking any part in the parliament of that year.[58]From 1467 to 1482 the numbers of the Lords of the Articles were from three to five representatives of each Estate. During the struggles which marked the end of the reign of James III, and before his son had succeeded in asserting the royal power, we find burgesses forming a very small proportion of the Committee of the Articles. The numbers are instructive:YearClergyBaronsBurgesses1483664(Acts, ii. 145.)1485663(Acts, ii. 169.)14889145(Acts, ii. 200.)14898104(Acts, ii. 217.)149110103(Acts, ii. 229.)On the other hand in 1503, under the strong rule of James IV, six clergy, six barons, and seven burgesses were chosen (Acts, ii. 239).[59]The final form assumed by the Courts of the Four Burghs and the Hanse Burghs.[60]It was next employed in 1581.[61]Randolph to Cecil, 3rd June, 1563,Foreign Calendar, Elizabeth.[62]Proclamation of James VI, July 1578.[63]Acts, ii. 289.[64]Robertson, app. iv. This is the only evidence that we possess to show that the burgesses chose their own representatives.[65]In the speech quotedsupra, pp. 38-39, King James ignores the Lords of the Articles altogether.[66]Miscellany of the Maitland Club, iii. 112-18.[67]Afterwards the first earl of Haddington.[68]"Humble Supplication of a great number of the Nobility and other Commissioners in the late Parliament,"State Trials, iii. 604. Cf. also Row,History of the Church of Scotland, pp. 365-66 (Wodrow Soc.).[69]History, vi. 87.[70]The numbers of the Lords of the Articles varied considerably. In 1587 it was fixed at any number varying from six to ten from each Estate, and this may be taken as fairly representative of their number throughout, though in early times it is somewhat smaller. Cf.supra, p. 48, n.[71]The title of "Lord" was early assumed by the president and senators of the College of Justice. The title was prefixed to the surname of the judge, if he did not take a territorial designation. An attempt was made by the wives of the early senators to adopt the corresponding title "Lady," but, according to tradition, their ambition received a check from King James, who remarked: "I made the carls lords, but wha made the carlines ladies?"[72]The befurred and bedecked gowns and hoods of every Estate are minutely described in an act of 1455.[73]Innes,op. cit., pp. 152-53.[74]One spectator of the scene remained cold and indifferent. John Knox protested against "such stinking pride of women," and feared that the "targetting of their taillies" (bordering of their robes with tassels) would "provock Goddis vengeance, not onlie against those foolish women, but against the haill Realme" (Laing,Knox, ii. 381).[75]Register of the Privy Council, 1600.[76]Parliament sat, almost invariably, in Edinburgh, from the beginning of the seventeenth century.[77]The law of treason is stated in book iv of the transcript of Glanvill'sDe Legibus Angliae, entitled "Regiam Maiestatem," and it should be compared with the acts against "Leasing-making" which were published from time to time.[78]There are two accounts, in theActs, of the appointment of this Committee. In one place, they are elected to treat of certain special business (super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis—Acts, i. 173), and, in another, of secret business (super certis et specialibus et secretis ... negociis—Acts, i. pp. 507, 508). The lists of members are identical, and only one Committee is intended.[79]"In secreta camera domini Regis—in suo secreto concilio."—Acts, i. p. 546.[80]"In camera sui parliamenti in publico."—Ibid.[81]There seem, indeed, to have frequently been two royal councils apart from Parliament, and to the smaller and more carefully selected of these the title of "Secret Council" is applied. At other times, there is evidence of only one advisory council apart from the Estates.[82]Privy Council Register, vol. i, introd. p. xi.[83]Cf. p. 56.[84]Cf. p. 56.[85]Acts, ii. p. 241.[86]Ibid., ii. pp. 215, 220.[87]Original Cronykil of Scotland, book viii, c. 46.[88]The control of taxation was maintained by Parliament, and the king was informed that the grants were to be used for special purposes. No general statement was made which could be construed into a definite claim of the right of appropriation of supplies. The "Parliament" merely used for a particular purpose the power which at that moment it chanced to possess. It is the absence of any assertion of or struggle for constitutional principle that is ultimately decisive against the "constitutional" theory. When, as here, the nobles had the power, they said they would do certain things, and they did them. But there is no conscious effort, traceable from generation to generation, such as we find in English history.[89]Cf. John Riddell,Stewartiana, Edinburgh, 1843.[90]Tytler,History of Scotland, iii. 26.[91]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 351.[92]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 373.[93]A declaration was made to Parliament regarding Rothesay's death, in answer to rumours against Albany. But this was merely a formal protest of innocence made to a semi-judicial body.[94]It may be remarked that the Act does not say that "in all time coming" a king or a regent is to be responsible, although it endows Rothesay with all the powers of a king. It was passed solely with reference to the immediate circumstances.[95]Acts against "baratry"—i.e.the purchase of benefices at Rome.[96]The king's interest in the maintenance of justice is illustrated by Fordun's well-known story that, on his return to Scotland, when he found the misery caused by the incompetence and negligence of the second Albany, he vowed to devote his life to the restoration of order: "Si Deus mihi vitam dederit, ipso auxiliante, et vitam saltem mihi caninam praestante, faciam per universum regnum clavem castrum, et dumetum vaccam, absque possessoris ambiguo ad modum custodire" (Scotichronicon, xv. 34).[97]King James VI,Basilikon Doron, Book ii.[98]The picture of Graham, the king's murderer, as an outraged exponent of constitutionalism is a pious imagination.[99]This has been viewed as a serious constitutional claim (e.g.Ridpath,op. cit., p. 4), and it illustrates the type of error on which the "constitutional" theory has thriven.[100]Edition of 1778, p. 24.[101]Basilikon Doron, Book ii.[102]There is no evidence that the Estates knew anything about this war.[103]The only incident that tells for the "constitutional" interpretation is the refusal of the Lords of the Articles to allow the king to aid Louis XI of France in 1473. But the action of the Estates was simply the action of the chancellor, Evandale, and his party, who ruled the king with a rod of iron. It is very likely that there was, especially among the clergy, a strong general feeling against going to war, and this feeling strengthened the king's jailers. But the opposition of a small ruling clique of nobles to the whim of a powerless monarch is scarcely to be regarded as a great constitutional fact. It must also be remembered that the few who constituted the Lords of the Articles were virtually the Estates.[104]William Elphinstone.[105]History of Greater Britain, p. 352 (Scottish Hist. Soc. ed.).[106]Pedro de Ayala to Ferdinand and Isabella, 25 July 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. no. 210). The context shows that the remark was incidental, and was induced by an allusion by the ambassador to the king's behaviour in battle.[107]Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen, pp. 102-5 (New Spalding Club ed.).[108]The burgesses and "a parte of the nobilitie" had petitioned for the act (Laing,Knox, i. 100).[109]In 1558, indeed, before the outbreak of hostilities, the Lords of the Congregation asked the queen-regent to abrogate the acts against heresy, and Mary made the pretext of her refusal the difficulty of obtaining the consent of the prelates (Spottiswood,History of the Church of Scotland, sub anno 1558).[110]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.[111]For other important points in connection with this Parliament, cf.supra, pp. 24-5.[112]Autobiography and Diary of Mr. James Melville, p. 370 (Wodrow Society). The year is 1596.[113]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, i. 329, 362, &c. (Maitland Club).[114]Ibid.i. 59.[115]Ibid.i. 506.[116]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, passim.[117]"We farther give over in the hands and power of the devill the said N., to the destruction of his flesh; straitlie charging all that professe the Lord Jesus, to whose knowledge this our sentence sall come, to repute and hold the said N. accursed, and unworthie of the familiar societie of Christians; declaring unto all men that suche as hereafter, before his repentance, sall haunt or familiarlie accompanie him, are partakers of his impietie and subject to the like condemnation."—Sentence of excommunication in theFirst Book of Discipline.[118]Calderwood,Historie of the Kirk of Scotland, v. 341-2 (Wodrow Society).[119]Ibid. pp. 396-7.[120]Cf.Presbytery Examined: an Essay on the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland since the Reformation, by the late Duke of Argyll; and the various books on Scottish Church history.[121]The same Parliament asked the council to bring forward its evidence against Mary. If we knew all that lay behind this motion, we should probably possess a key to the problems on which so much ingenuity has been exercised. The statement, frequently quoted, that the Estates passed a solemn resolution affirming their power to depose the sovereign rests solely on the authority of Buchanan, and is directly antagonistic to the language both of theActsand of the Scottish commissioners' protestations at York and Westminster, in which Mary is represented as abdicating of her own free will.[122]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.[123]"A Perfect Description of the People and Country of Scotland," printed in theAbbotsford Miscellany.[124]"Answer to the 'Perfect Description',"Ibid.[125]Hacket,Scrinia Reserata.[126]Letter of the Estates to the Assembly, 17th July, 1641 (Acts, v. 625).[127]Some Brieffe Memorialls and Passages of Church and State from 1641-49 (Historical Works of Sir James Balfour, vol. iii.).[128]Cf.Scotland and the Commonwealth, ed. Firth (Scottish Hist. Soc.).[129]Principal Baillie's Letters and Journals, iii. 225-26, ed. Laing.[130]The Government of Scotland during the Commonwealth(Acts, vol. vi, pt. 2). See also Mr. Firth's volumesScotland under the CommonwealthandScotland and the Protectorate(Scottish History Society).[131]Middleton, Appendix, &c.,ut supra.[132]Report on the State and Condition of the Burghs of Scotland, 1692 (Miscellany of the Scottish Burgh Record Soc.).[133]The main heads of James's delinquencies were: (1) erecting schools and societies of Jesuits, &c.; (2) making papists great officers of state; (3) enforcing oaths contrary to law; (4) taxation and the maintenance of a standing army without consent of Parliament; (5) the employment of military officers as judges; (6) exorbitant fines; (7) illegal imprisonment; (8) forfeitures by obsolete laws; (9) subversion of rights of royal burghs; (10) interference with justice.[134]In spite of the irritating interferences which provoked the indignant rhetoric of Fletcher of Saltoun, and these had reference mainly to peace and war, the maintenance of an army, and places and pensions.[135]Party names here for the first time in strictly parliamentary history. The Resolutioners and Protestors of 1649 were religious divisions.[136]Cf. the present writer's Map of the Parliamentary Representation of Scotland, in Mr. R. L. Poole'sHistorical Atlas. (No. XXVIII.)

[1]The later volumes of the Privy Council Register, under the editorship of Professor Masson and Mr. P. Hume Brown, deal with the period immediately before and after the Union of the Crowns, and so do not fall within our subject.[2]On this subject, cf. Maitland,Domesday Book and Beyond, pp. 226-244.[3]After the Union of the Crowns, the sources of information became very much more numerous, and the subject has been treated with much greater fulness. The work of Professor Masson, Mr. Gardiner, and Mr. Firth on the period between 1603 and 1660 has placed the constitutional history of Scotland for that period in a position quite different from that which it occupies in the centuries preceding the Union.[4]Opera Geographica et historica, edition of 1707, p. 318.[5]Spanish Calendar, i, 210.[6]History of English Law, vol. i, pp. 222-224 (1st edn., pp. 201-203).[7]Cf. Pitscottie'sChronicles of Scotland, vol. ii, p. 477. Scottish Text Soc. Edn., ed. Aeneas Mackay. Sheriff Mackay's notes are specially valuable from the legal stand-point, and his edition gives a new importance to Pitscottie's work.[8]Cf. Hill Burton's Introduction to the Privy Council Register, vol. ii.[9]Baron Hume, quoted in Renton'sEncyclopaedia of the Laws of England, vol. xi, p. 402.[10]History of King James the Sext, p. 88 (Bannatyne Club ed.).[11]Diurnal of Occurrents in Scotland, p. 76 (Bannatyne Club).[12]Aikman,Buchanan, i. 437. Buchanan is the source of the whole constitutional myth. The second founder of the legend was George Ridpath, who published, anonymously, in 1703,An Historical Account of the Ancient Rights and Power of the Parliament of Scotland. This brilliant and ingenious political tract is based on Buchanan, who is always the real, and frequently the avowed, authority for Ridpath's view; and by Ridpath, in turn, many more recent writers have been influenced.[13]Innes,Critical Essay, i. 361-95.[14]For a typical instance of this cf. Boece,Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen(New Spalding Club ed.), pp. 112-13.[15]Pedro de Ayala, writing to Ferdinand and Isabella in July, 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. 210), divides the revenue of James IV into six main heads—(1) Leases of Crown lands, held for three years and redeemable by a fine. (2) Customs. "The import duties are insignificant, but the exports yield a considerable sum of money, because there are three principal articles of export, that is to say, wood, hides, and fish." (3) The profits of justice. James's predecessors "farmed it to certain persons called justices.... This king does not like to farm the administration of the law, because justice is not well administered in that way." (4) The ordinary feudal incidents—reliefs, wardships, and marriage. (5) Vacant bishoprics, abbacies, &c. (6) Rent in kind, from meat and poultry, and especially from fisheries. Only one of these, namely, customs duties, could have been regulated by the Estates, and there is on record no instance of any attempt to do so. The revenue was collected on the English system, described in theDialogus de Scaccario. The sheriffs and the king's stewards collected the sums due in the counties, and the bailiffs and "custumars" had charge of the amercement of the burghs and the collection of the customs. The main differences between the system in Scotland under James IV and that of England under Henry VII is that the Scottish Exchequer Court was not so fully organized as the English, and that the system of checks on the honesty of the sheriffs, &c., was much less elaborate. All the sources of revenue were, as a rule, "farmed out"; the king received a composition, and the actual collector made as much profit as he could.[16]Gilbert Stuart,Of the Public Law and Constitution of Scotland, note xxviii.[17]Hill Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 82.[18]The evidence upon which the theory of popular representation is based is as vague as the theory itself. Eadmer (Hist. Nov.p. 97, Lond. 1623; cf. also p. 134) tells us of an election, in 1107, of a bishop of St. Andrews "by Alexander, king of Scotland, the clergy, and the people." The Book of Scone (Liber de Scon.p. 1) describes the re-foundation of the abbey in 1114-15 by King Alexander. It is confirmed by his wife and nephew, several bishops, and a number of nobles, "consilio proborum hominum." Ten years later, at the foundation of the abbey of Dunfermline (Registrum de Dunfermelyn, p. 3; cf. also the Charters of Holyrood), we find a phrase employed to which some importance has been attached. Bishops and nobles confirm as usual, but with the acquiescence of the people and clergy. The form "clero etiam acquiescente et populo" is of frequent occurrence. The phrase "all the community of the kingryk" has been treated in the text. The similar phrases "probi homines" and "clero acquiescente et populo" are simply common technical terms belonging to the Chancery imitated by the Scottish scribe. The latter does not even imply consultation, and the former means the smaller tenants-in-chief. In theLaws of the Burghswe find it used for the leading men—theoptimates—of the town. It is not a popular term at all. On the other hand, too, we have councils described in quite different terms. In 1174 William the Lion held a council at Stirling, and asked an aid from his "optimates" (Fordun, viii. 73). In 1190 the "prelati et proceres" of Scotland gave the king 10,000 marks (Fordun, viii. 62). On the death of Alexander III the guardians describe themselves as "de communi consilio constituti" (Hist. Doc. relating to Scotland, i. 95), while Rishanger tells how "omnes Scoti" chose Wallace. The change in the political circumstances is sufficient to account for whatever importance may be attached to the words. It is true that Fordun, speaking of the same period, frequently uses the word Estates ("communitates"). But Fordun was not a contemporary, and the word had acquired a technical meaning by his time. Moreover, he uses the word very loosely. Sometimes he intends by it the land itself, as when he tells us how the English ravaged it.[19]Acts of the Parliament of Scotland, i. 371, &c.[20]Ibid.i. 377. The use of the word "community" appealed more strongly than anything else to the older historians.[21]Cf.Ancient Laws of the Burghs of Scotland(Burgh Record Soc.).[22]So important was their meeting that when Edward I of England held a parliament at Newcastle in 1292, and some question arose regarding their privileges, the four burghs were consulted, and the decision was made in conformity with their laws and customs (Rot. Parl., i. 107).[23]Fordun, viii. I.[24]Thoughts on the Origin of Feudal Tenures and the Descent of Ancient Peerages in Scotland, by George Wallace, 1783.[25]E.g.Wigton in 1342, and Sutherland in 1347.[26]Wallace,op. cit., p. 163.[27]Wallace,op. cit., p. 192, &c.[28]Robertson,Hist. of Scotland, App. iv. The claim is not based upon any constitutional right or theory. It is stated as a matter founded on common sense, and the efficacy of the petition lay in the support of those who had special reasons for desiring the presence of the smaller barons. The language of Randolph's letter shows how far the strictly legal position was from being understood.[29]Foreign Calendar, 19th Aug., 1560; Laing,Knox, vi. 116.[30]Cf. Innes,Legal Antiquities, p. 116.[31]Charters of the Burgh of Aberdeen, ed. P. J. Anderson; also in the Spalding Club edition of Gordon'sDescription of Aberdeen.[32]Innes,op. cit., p. 116.[33]Acts, vol. i. References to acts when no authority is quoted are always from the volumes ofActs of the Parliaments of Scotland.[34]Acts, i. 492. We have no reason for supposing that "proceres" included burgesses, as it is generally used in contradistinction to them.[35]"Plebanos, qui ad parliamentum non erunt, nec voluerint promittere interesse ibidem."[36]Although the burgesses had thus successfully asserted their right to a place in Parliament, the theory was not at once extended to the meetings known as conventions, which could impose taxes, and possessed every parliamentary power except that of passing general laws. In 1503 an act was passed, ordering that "commissioners and head men of burghs be warned" to attend conventions; but it had to be re-enacted in 1563, and even after that date it was not completely operative. Between 1566 (the first date of their recorded presence) and the end of the sixteenth century burgesses were present at only half of the conventions which were held. It is important to note that the royal burghs alone had parliamentary representation up to the year 1832.[37]We have no evidence that the Court of the Four Burghs was in any sense strictly representative.[38]The possible objection that a similar theory of burghal representation has been stated and rejected by English constitutional historians is scarcely applicable. For it is agreed that the idea of representation existed in England before the towns were summoned to Parliament, while in Scotland no such idea is traceable, nor are there any writs such as were issued for the English towns. It might even be argued that, in strict theory, there was no representation in Scotland till 1832; that commissioners both from shires and burghs only saved their fellows the trouble of attendance, the right to attend being, notde factobut in ultimate theory, possessed by all who were entitled to vote. Such a statement is certainly true of the shire, at all events.[39]The chief officers of state were the lord chancellor, the lord high treasurer, and the lord privy seal, who took precedence of all the nobility; the secretary, the clerk of register, the king's advocate, the treasurer's deputy, and the lord justice clerk.[40]They were excluded from 1640 to 1662.[41]Acts, i. 491. The use of the term in connection with the coronation of Alexander II in 1214 (Acts, i. 67) is explained by its being simply a quotation from Fordun (ix. 1).[42]Cf.supra, pp. 21-25.[43]Cf.supra, pp. 25-26.[44]Cf.supra, pp. 18-19.[45]Videsupra, p. 24.[46]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.[47]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.[48]The right of prorogation is tacitly assumed by the king in this speech. It was the cause of a dispute in the troublous times which followed 1638. The Parliament of 1640 protested that "Johne, Erle of Traquair, his Majestie's Commissioner, did take upon him without consent of the Estates, upon a private warrand, procured by himself, against his Majestie's publict patent, under the great seall," to prorogue Parliament. They therefore continued to sit, and took up stronger ground, viz. that prorogation without consent of Parliament was "against the lawes and libertie of the kingdom, ... without precedent, example, and practice." The language is clearly taken from the contemporary protests of the English Commons, and it cannot be regarded as more than a political weapon, borrowed for this occasion from the English constitutional armoury. It in no way corresponds with the general state of feeling in Scotland. In 1661 the Estates resolved that "the King hath sole power to call and prorogue Parliaments." Both resolutions were recognitions of fact, not of theory. At various times, from 1398 onwards, acts were passed that Parliament should meet once a year. These were probably connected with the judicial powers of the Estates. In point of fact, they were dead letters.[49]Convocatis tribus communitatibus Regni ... certi personae electi fuerunt per easdem ad parliamentum tenendum, data aliis causa autumpni licencia ad propria redeundi.[50]De concessu et confirmatione trium communitatum congregatarum, propter importunitatem et caristiam temporis ... electi fuerunt certi personae ad ipsum parliamentum tenendum, data licencia aliis remeandi.[51]Acts, i. 173.[52]Imitando videlicet ordinem illum et modum qui servabantur in parliamento tento apud Perth tempore venerandae memoriae domini Regis David, anno Regni ipsius quadragesimo [1369], electi fuerunt quidam....[53]Ad tractandum et deliberandum super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis, antequam perveniant ad noticiam consilii generalis, licentiatis autem aliis ut recedant.[54]De consensu et assensu trium communitatum per presidentes sive per personas electas ad determinationem negociorum in parliamento eodem.[55]Primo et principaliter, iuxta predictos modum et ordinem, est ordinatum quod nullus electus ad consilium cuiuscunque conditionis gradus pre-eminentiae sive status alium non electum ad consilium seu in consilio Regis sibi consiliarium vel assessorem aut alia de causa adducat.[56]"Comparentibus tribus Regni statibus apud Edinburgh, omnes comites nobiles et barones ac libere tenentes dicti regni...." The omission of the burgesses seems to have attracted the attention of Sir John Skene, who in his edited volume of theActs(temp. Jac. VI) includes the formal revocation in the proceedings of the Parliament of 1437-38, and prints, instead of the somewhat less emphatic words of the original, a statement that the revocation was sanctioned by "the haill three Estates of the Realme, sittand in plane Parliament, that is to say, the Clergie, Barrones, and Commissioners of Burrowes."[57]In 1445, three burgesses, along with fifteen of the clergy and barons, attest the erection of the lordship of Hamilton; but there is no further evidence of their being present or taking any part in the parliament of that year.[58]From 1467 to 1482 the numbers of the Lords of the Articles were from three to five representatives of each Estate. During the struggles which marked the end of the reign of James III, and before his son had succeeded in asserting the royal power, we find burgesses forming a very small proportion of the Committee of the Articles. The numbers are instructive:YearClergyBaronsBurgesses1483664(Acts, ii. 145.)1485663(Acts, ii. 169.)14889145(Acts, ii. 200.)14898104(Acts, ii. 217.)149110103(Acts, ii. 229.)On the other hand in 1503, under the strong rule of James IV, six clergy, six barons, and seven burgesses were chosen (Acts, ii. 239).[59]The final form assumed by the Courts of the Four Burghs and the Hanse Burghs.[60]It was next employed in 1581.[61]Randolph to Cecil, 3rd June, 1563,Foreign Calendar, Elizabeth.[62]Proclamation of James VI, July 1578.[63]Acts, ii. 289.[64]Robertson, app. iv. This is the only evidence that we possess to show that the burgesses chose their own representatives.[65]In the speech quotedsupra, pp. 38-39, King James ignores the Lords of the Articles altogether.[66]Miscellany of the Maitland Club, iii. 112-18.[67]Afterwards the first earl of Haddington.[68]"Humble Supplication of a great number of the Nobility and other Commissioners in the late Parliament,"State Trials, iii. 604. Cf. also Row,History of the Church of Scotland, pp. 365-66 (Wodrow Soc.).[69]History, vi. 87.[70]The numbers of the Lords of the Articles varied considerably. In 1587 it was fixed at any number varying from six to ten from each Estate, and this may be taken as fairly representative of their number throughout, though in early times it is somewhat smaller. Cf.supra, p. 48, n.[71]The title of "Lord" was early assumed by the president and senators of the College of Justice. The title was prefixed to the surname of the judge, if he did not take a territorial designation. An attempt was made by the wives of the early senators to adopt the corresponding title "Lady," but, according to tradition, their ambition received a check from King James, who remarked: "I made the carls lords, but wha made the carlines ladies?"[72]The befurred and bedecked gowns and hoods of every Estate are minutely described in an act of 1455.[73]Innes,op. cit., pp. 152-53.[74]One spectator of the scene remained cold and indifferent. John Knox protested against "such stinking pride of women," and feared that the "targetting of their taillies" (bordering of their robes with tassels) would "provock Goddis vengeance, not onlie against those foolish women, but against the haill Realme" (Laing,Knox, ii. 381).[75]Register of the Privy Council, 1600.[76]Parliament sat, almost invariably, in Edinburgh, from the beginning of the seventeenth century.[77]The law of treason is stated in book iv of the transcript of Glanvill'sDe Legibus Angliae, entitled "Regiam Maiestatem," and it should be compared with the acts against "Leasing-making" which were published from time to time.[78]There are two accounts, in theActs, of the appointment of this Committee. In one place, they are elected to treat of certain special business (super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis—Acts, i. 173), and, in another, of secret business (super certis et specialibus et secretis ... negociis—Acts, i. pp. 507, 508). The lists of members are identical, and only one Committee is intended.[79]"In secreta camera domini Regis—in suo secreto concilio."—Acts, i. p. 546.[80]"In camera sui parliamenti in publico."—Ibid.[81]There seem, indeed, to have frequently been two royal councils apart from Parliament, and to the smaller and more carefully selected of these the title of "Secret Council" is applied. At other times, there is evidence of only one advisory council apart from the Estates.[82]Privy Council Register, vol. i, introd. p. xi.[83]Cf. p. 56.[84]Cf. p. 56.[85]Acts, ii. p. 241.[86]Ibid., ii. pp. 215, 220.[87]Original Cronykil of Scotland, book viii, c. 46.[88]The control of taxation was maintained by Parliament, and the king was informed that the grants were to be used for special purposes. No general statement was made which could be construed into a definite claim of the right of appropriation of supplies. The "Parliament" merely used for a particular purpose the power which at that moment it chanced to possess. It is the absence of any assertion of or struggle for constitutional principle that is ultimately decisive against the "constitutional" theory. When, as here, the nobles had the power, they said they would do certain things, and they did them. But there is no conscious effort, traceable from generation to generation, such as we find in English history.[89]Cf. John Riddell,Stewartiana, Edinburgh, 1843.[90]Tytler,History of Scotland, iii. 26.[91]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 351.[92]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 373.[93]A declaration was made to Parliament regarding Rothesay's death, in answer to rumours against Albany. But this was merely a formal protest of innocence made to a semi-judicial body.[94]It may be remarked that the Act does not say that "in all time coming" a king or a regent is to be responsible, although it endows Rothesay with all the powers of a king. It was passed solely with reference to the immediate circumstances.[95]Acts against "baratry"—i.e.the purchase of benefices at Rome.[96]The king's interest in the maintenance of justice is illustrated by Fordun's well-known story that, on his return to Scotland, when he found the misery caused by the incompetence and negligence of the second Albany, he vowed to devote his life to the restoration of order: "Si Deus mihi vitam dederit, ipso auxiliante, et vitam saltem mihi caninam praestante, faciam per universum regnum clavem castrum, et dumetum vaccam, absque possessoris ambiguo ad modum custodire" (Scotichronicon, xv. 34).[97]King James VI,Basilikon Doron, Book ii.[98]The picture of Graham, the king's murderer, as an outraged exponent of constitutionalism is a pious imagination.[99]This has been viewed as a serious constitutional claim (e.g.Ridpath,op. cit., p. 4), and it illustrates the type of error on which the "constitutional" theory has thriven.[100]Edition of 1778, p. 24.[101]Basilikon Doron, Book ii.[102]There is no evidence that the Estates knew anything about this war.[103]The only incident that tells for the "constitutional" interpretation is the refusal of the Lords of the Articles to allow the king to aid Louis XI of France in 1473. But the action of the Estates was simply the action of the chancellor, Evandale, and his party, who ruled the king with a rod of iron. It is very likely that there was, especially among the clergy, a strong general feeling against going to war, and this feeling strengthened the king's jailers. But the opposition of a small ruling clique of nobles to the whim of a powerless monarch is scarcely to be regarded as a great constitutional fact. It must also be remembered that the few who constituted the Lords of the Articles were virtually the Estates.[104]William Elphinstone.[105]History of Greater Britain, p. 352 (Scottish Hist. Soc. ed.).[106]Pedro de Ayala to Ferdinand and Isabella, 25 July 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. no. 210). The context shows that the remark was incidental, and was induced by an allusion by the ambassador to the king's behaviour in battle.[107]Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen, pp. 102-5 (New Spalding Club ed.).[108]The burgesses and "a parte of the nobilitie" had petitioned for the act (Laing,Knox, i. 100).[109]In 1558, indeed, before the outbreak of hostilities, the Lords of the Congregation asked the queen-regent to abrogate the acts against heresy, and Mary made the pretext of her refusal the difficulty of obtaining the consent of the prelates (Spottiswood,History of the Church of Scotland, sub anno 1558).[110]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.[111]For other important points in connection with this Parliament, cf.supra, pp. 24-5.[112]Autobiography and Diary of Mr. James Melville, p. 370 (Wodrow Society). The year is 1596.[113]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, i. 329, 362, &c. (Maitland Club).[114]Ibid.i. 59.[115]Ibid.i. 506.[116]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, passim.[117]"We farther give over in the hands and power of the devill the said N., to the destruction of his flesh; straitlie charging all that professe the Lord Jesus, to whose knowledge this our sentence sall come, to repute and hold the said N. accursed, and unworthie of the familiar societie of Christians; declaring unto all men that suche as hereafter, before his repentance, sall haunt or familiarlie accompanie him, are partakers of his impietie and subject to the like condemnation."—Sentence of excommunication in theFirst Book of Discipline.[118]Calderwood,Historie of the Kirk of Scotland, v. 341-2 (Wodrow Society).[119]Ibid. pp. 396-7.[120]Cf.Presbytery Examined: an Essay on the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland since the Reformation, by the late Duke of Argyll; and the various books on Scottish Church history.[121]The same Parliament asked the council to bring forward its evidence against Mary. If we knew all that lay behind this motion, we should probably possess a key to the problems on which so much ingenuity has been exercised. The statement, frequently quoted, that the Estates passed a solemn resolution affirming their power to depose the sovereign rests solely on the authority of Buchanan, and is directly antagonistic to the language both of theActsand of the Scottish commissioners' protestations at York and Westminster, in which Mary is represented as abdicating of her own free will.[122]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.[123]"A Perfect Description of the People and Country of Scotland," printed in theAbbotsford Miscellany.[124]"Answer to the 'Perfect Description',"Ibid.[125]Hacket,Scrinia Reserata.[126]Letter of the Estates to the Assembly, 17th July, 1641 (Acts, v. 625).[127]Some Brieffe Memorialls and Passages of Church and State from 1641-49 (Historical Works of Sir James Balfour, vol. iii.).[128]Cf.Scotland and the Commonwealth, ed. Firth (Scottish Hist. Soc.).[129]Principal Baillie's Letters and Journals, iii. 225-26, ed. Laing.[130]The Government of Scotland during the Commonwealth(Acts, vol. vi, pt. 2). See also Mr. Firth's volumesScotland under the CommonwealthandScotland and the Protectorate(Scottish History Society).[131]Middleton, Appendix, &c.,ut supra.[132]Report on the State and Condition of the Burghs of Scotland, 1692 (Miscellany of the Scottish Burgh Record Soc.).[133]The main heads of James's delinquencies were: (1) erecting schools and societies of Jesuits, &c.; (2) making papists great officers of state; (3) enforcing oaths contrary to law; (4) taxation and the maintenance of a standing army without consent of Parliament; (5) the employment of military officers as judges; (6) exorbitant fines; (7) illegal imprisonment; (8) forfeitures by obsolete laws; (9) subversion of rights of royal burghs; (10) interference with justice.[134]In spite of the irritating interferences which provoked the indignant rhetoric of Fletcher of Saltoun, and these had reference mainly to peace and war, the maintenance of an army, and places and pensions.[135]Party names here for the first time in strictly parliamentary history. The Resolutioners and Protestors of 1649 were religious divisions.[136]Cf. the present writer's Map of the Parliamentary Representation of Scotland, in Mr. R. L. Poole'sHistorical Atlas. (No. XXVIII.)

[1]The later volumes of the Privy Council Register, under the editorship of Professor Masson and Mr. P. Hume Brown, deal with the period immediately before and after the Union of the Crowns, and so do not fall within our subject.

[1]The later volumes of the Privy Council Register, under the editorship of Professor Masson and Mr. P. Hume Brown, deal with the period immediately before and after the Union of the Crowns, and so do not fall within our subject.

[2]On this subject, cf. Maitland,Domesday Book and Beyond, pp. 226-244.

[2]On this subject, cf. Maitland,Domesday Book and Beyond, pp. 226-244.

[3]After the Union of the Crowns, the sources of information became very much more numerous, and the subject has been treated with much greater fulness. The work of Professor Masson, Mr. Gardiner, and Mr. Firth on the period between 1603 and 1660 has placed the constitutional history of Scotland for that period in a position quite different from that which it occupies in the centuries preceding the Union.

[3]After the Union of the Crowns, the sources of information became very much more numerous, and the subject has been treated with much greater fulness. The work of Professor Masson, Mr. Gardiner, and Mr. Firth on the period between 1603 and 1660 has placed the constitutional history of Scotland for that period in a position quite different from that which it occupies in the centuries preceding the Union.

[4]Opera Geographica et historica, edition of 1707, p. 318.

[4]Opera Geographica et historica, edition of 1707, p. 318.

[5]Spanish Calendar, i, 210.

[5]Spanish Calendar, i, 210.

[6]History of English Law, vol. i, pp. 222-224 (1st edn., pp. 201-203).

[6]History of English Law, vol. i, pp. 222-224 (1st edn., pp. 201-203).

[7]Cf. Pitscottie'sChronicles of Scotland, vol. ii, p. 477. Scottish Text Soc. Edn., ed. Aeneas Mackay. Sheriff Mackay's notes are specially valuable from the legal stand-point, and his edition gives a new importance to Pitscottie's work.

[7]Cf. Pitscottie'sChronicles of Scotland, vol. ii, p. 477. Scottish Text Soc. Edn., ed. Aeneas Mackay. Sheriff Mackay's notes are specially valuable from the legal stand-point, and his edition gives a new importance to Pitscottie's work.

[8]Cf. Hill Burton's Introduction to the Privy Council Register, vol. ii.

[8]Cf. Hill Burton's Introduction to the Privy Council Register, vol. ii.

[9]Baron Hume, quoted in Renton'sEncyclopaedia of the Laws of England, vol. xi, p. 402.

[9]Baron Hume, quoted in Renton'sEncyclopaedia of the Laws of England, vol. xi, p. 402.

[10]History of King James the Sext, p. 88 (Bannatyne Club ed.).

[10]History of King James the Sext, p. 88 (Bannatyne Club ed.).

[11]Diurnal of Occurrents in Scotland, p. 76 (Bannatyne Club).

[11]Diurnal of Occurrents in Scotland, p. 76 (Bannatyne Club).

[12]Aikman,Buchanan, i. 437. Buchanan is the source of the whole constitutional myth. The second founder of the legend was George Ridpath, who published, anonymously, in 1703,An Historical Account of the Ancient Rights and Power of the Parliament of Scotland. This brilliant and ingenious political tract is based on Buchanan, who is always the real, and frequently the avowed, authority for Ridpath's view; and by Ridpath, in turn, many more recent writers have been influenced.

[12]Aikman,Buchanan, i. 437. Buchanan is the source of the whole constitutional myth. The second founder of the legend was George Ridpath, who published, anonymously, in 1703,An Historical Account of the Ancient Rights and Power of the Parliament of Scotland. This brilliant and ingenious political tract is based on Buchanan, who is always the real, and frequently the avowed, authority for Ridpath's view; and by Ridpath, in turn, many more recent writers have been influenced.

[13]Innes,Critical Essay, i. 361-95.

[13]Innes,Critical Essay, i. 361-95.

[14]For a typical instance of this cf. Boece,Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen(New Spalding Club ed.), pp. 112-13.

[14]For a typical instance of this cf. Boece,Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen(New Spalding Club ed.), pp. 112-13.

[15]Pedro de Ayala, writing to Ferdinand and Isabella in July, 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. 210), divides the revenue of James IV into six main heads—(1) Leases of Crown lands, held for three years and redeemable by a fine. (2) Customs. "The import duties are insignificant, but the exports yield a considerable sum of money, because there are three principal articles of export, that is to say, wood, hides, and fish." (3) The profits of justice. James's predecessors "farmed it to certain persons called justices.... This king does not like to farm the administration of the law, because justice is not well administered in that way." (4) The ordinary feudal incidents—reliefs, wardships, and marriage. (5) Vacant bishoprics, abbacies, &c. (6) Rent in kind, from meat and poultry, and especially from fisheries. Only one of these, namely, customs duties, could have been regulated by the Estates, and there is on record no instance of any attempt to do so. The revenue was collected on the English system, described in theDialogus de Scaccario. The sheriffs and the king's stewards collected the sums due in the counties, and the bailiffs and "custumars" had charge of the amercement of the burghs and the collection of the customs. The main differences between the system in Scotland under James IV and that of England under Henry VII is that the Scottish Exchequer Court was not so fully organized as the English, and that the system of checks on the honesty of the sheriffs, &c., was much less elaborate. All the sources of revenue were, as a rule, "farmed out"; the king received a composition, and the actual collector made as much profit as he could.

[15]Pedro de Ayala, writing to Ferdinand and Isabella in July, 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. 210), divides the revenue of James IV into six main heads—(1) Leases of Crown lands, held for three years and redeemable by a fine. (2) Customs. "The import duties are insignificant, but the exports yield a considerable sum of money, because there are three principal articles of export, that is to say, wood, hides, and fish." (3) The profits of justice. James's predecessors "farmed it to certain persons called justices.... This king does not like to farm the administration of the law, because justice is not well administered in that way." (4) The ordinary feudal incidents—reliefs, wardships, and marriage. (5) Vacant bishoprics, abbacies, &c. (6) Rent in kind, from meat and poultry, and especially from fisheries. Only one of these, namely, customs duties, could have been regulated by the Estates, and there is on record no instance of any attempt to do so. The revenue was collected on the English system, described in theDialogus de Scaccario. The sheriffs and the king's stewards collected the sums due in the counties, and the bailiffs and "custumars" had charge of the amercement of the burghs and the collection of the customs. The main differences between the system in Scotland under James IV and that of England under Henry VII is that the Scottish Exchequer Court was not so fully organized as the English, and that the system of checks on the honesty of the sheriffs, &c., was much less elaborate. All the sources of revenue were, as a rule, "farmed out"; the king received a composition, and the actual collector made as much profit as he could.

[16]Gilbert Stuart,Of the Public Law and Constitution of Scotland, note xxviii.

[16]Gilbert Stuart,Of the Public Law and Constitution of Scotland, note xxviii.

[17]Hill Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 82.

[17]Hill Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 82.

[18]The evidence upon which the theory of popular representation is based is as vague as the theory itself. Eadmer (Hist. Nov.p. 97, Lond. 1623; cf. also p. 134) tells us of an election, in 1107, of a bishop of St. Andrews "by Alexander, king of Scotland, the clergy, and the people." The Book of Scone (Liber de Scon.p. 1) describes the re-foundation of the abbey in 1114-15 by King Alexander. It is confirmed by his wife and nephew, several bishops, and a number of nobles, "consilio proborum hominum." Ten years later, at the foundation of the abbey of Dunfermline (Registrum de Dunfermelyn, p. 3; cf. also the Charters of Holyrood), we find a phrase employed to which some importance has been attached. Bishops and nobles confirm as usual, but with the acquiescence of the people and clergy. The form "clero etiam acquiescente et populo" is of frequent occurrence. The phrase "all the community of the kingryk" has been treated in the text. The similar phrases "probi homines" and "clero acquiescente et populo" are simply common technical terms belonging to the Chancery imitated by the Scottish scribe. The latter does not even imply consultation, and the former means the smaller tenants-in-chief. In theLaws of the Burghswe find it used for the leading men—theoptimates—of the town. It is not a popular term at all. On the other hand, too, we have councils described in quite different terms. In 1174 William the Lion held a council at Stirling, and asked an aid from his "optimates" (Fordun, viii. 73). In 1190 the "prelati et proceres" of Scotland gave the king 10,000 marks (Fordun, viii. 62). On the death of Alexander III the guardians describe themselves as "de communi consilio constituti" (Hist. Doc. relating to Scotland, i. 95), while Rishanger tells how "omnes Scoti" chose Wallace. The change in the political circumstances is sufficient to account for whatever importance may be attached to the words. It is true that Fordun, speaking of the same period, frequently uses the word Estates ("communitates"). But Fordun was not a contemporary, and the word had acquired a technical meaning by his time. Moreover, he uses the word very loosely. Sometimes he intends by it the land itself, as when he tells us how the English ravaged it.

[18]The evidence upon which the theory of popular representation is based is as vague as the theory itself. Eadmer (Hist. Nov.p. 97, Lond. 1623; cf. also p. 134) tells us of an election, in 1107, of a bishop of St. Andrews "by Alexander, king of Scotland, the clergy, and the people." The Book of Scone (Liber de Scon.p. 1) describes the re-foundation of the abbey in 1114-15 by King Alexander. It is confirmed by his wife and nephew, several bishops, and a number of nobles, "consilio proborum hominum." Ten years later, at the foundation of the abbey of Dunfermline (Registrum de Dunfermelyn, p. 3; cf. also the Charters of Holyrood), we find a phrase employed to which some importance has been attached. Bishops and nobles confirm as usual, but with the acquiescence of the people and clergy. The form "clero etiam acquiescente et populo" is of frequent occurrence. The phrase "all the community of the kingryk" has been treated in the text. The similar phrases "probi homines" and "clero acquiescente et populo" are simply common technical terms belonging to the Chancery imitated by the Scottish scribe. The latter does not even imply consultation, and the former means the smaller tenants-in-chief. In theLaws of the Burghswe find it used for the leading men—theoptimates—of the town. It is not a popular term at all. On the other hand, too, we have councils described in quite different terms. In 1174 William the Lion held a council at Stirling, and asked an aid from his "optimates" (Fordun, viii. 73). In 1190 the "prelati et proceres" of Scotland gave the king 10,000 marks (Fordun, viii. 62). On the death of Alexander III the guardians describe themselves as "de communi consilio constituti" (Hist. Doc. relating to Scotland, i. 95), while Rishanger tells how "omnes Scoti" chose Wallace. The change in the political circumstances is sufficient to account for whatever importance may be attached to the words. It is true that Fordun, speaking of the same period, frequently uses the word Estates ("communitates"). But Fordun was not a contemporary, and the word had acquired a technical meaning by his time. Moreover, he uses the word very loosely. Sometimes he intends by it the land itself, as when he tells us how the English ravaged it.

[19]Acts of the Parliament of Scotland, i. 371, &c.

[19]Acts of the Parliament of Scotland, i. 371, &c.

[20]Ibid.i. 377. The use of the word "community" appealed more strongly than anything else to the older historians.

[20]Ibid.i. 377. The use of the word "community" appealed more strongly than anything else to the older historians.

[21]Cf.Ancient Laws of the Burghs of Scotland(Burgh Record Soc.).

[21]Cf.Ancient Laws of the Burghs of Scotland(Burgh Record Soc.).

[22]So important was their meeting that when Edward I of England held a parliament at Newcastle in 1292, and some question arose regarding their privileges, the four burghs were consulted, and the decision was made in conformity with their laws and customs (Rot. Parl., i. 107).

[22]So important was their meeting that when Edward I of England held a parliament at Newcastle in 1292, and some question arose regarding their privileges, the four burghs were consulted, and the decision was made in conformity with their laws and customs (Rot. Parl., i. 107).

[23]Fordun, viii. I.

[23]Fordun, viii. I.

[24]Thoughts on the Origin of Feudal Tenures and the Descent of Ancient Peerages in Scotland, by George Wallace, 1783.

[24]Thoughts on the Origin of Feudal Tenures and the Descent of Ancient Peerages in Scotland, by George Wallace, 1783.

[25]E.g.Wigton in 1342, and Sutherland in 1347.

[25]E.g.Wigton in 1342, and Sutherland in 1347.

[26]Wallace,op. cit., p. 163.

[26]Wallace,op. cit., p. 163.

[27]Wallace,op. cit., p. 192, &c.

[27]Wallace,op. cit., p. 192, &c.

[28]Robertson,Hist. of Scotland, App. iv. The claim is not based upon any constitutional right or theory. It is stated as a matter founded on common sense, and the efficacy of the petition lay in the support of those who had special reasons for desiring the presence of the smaller barons. The language of Randolph's letter shows how far the strictly legal position was from being understood.

[28]Robertson,Hist. of Scotland, App. iv. The claim is not based upon any constitutional right or theory. It is stated as a matter founded on common sense, and the efficacy of the petition lay in the support of those who had special reasons for desiring the presence of the smaller barons. The language of Randolph's letter shows how far the strictly legal position was from being understood.

[29]Foreign Calendar, 19th Aug., 1560; Laing,Knox, vi. 116.

[29]Foreign Calendar, 19th Aug., 1560; Laing,Knox, vi. 116.

[30]Cf. Innes,Legal Antiquities, p. 116.

[30]Cf. Innes,Legal Antiquities, p. 116.

[31]Charters of the Burgh of Aberdeen, ed. P. J. Anderson; also in the Spalding Club edition of Gordon'sDescription of Aberdeen.

[31]Charters of the Burgh of Aberdeen, ed. P. J. Anderson; also in the Spalding Club edition of Gordon'sDescription of Aberdeen.

[32]Innes,op. cit., p. 116.

[32]Innes,op. cit., p. 116.

[33]Acts, vol. i. References to acts when no authority is quoted are always from the volumes ofActs of the Parliaments of Scotland.

[33]Acts, vol. i. References to acts when no authority is quoted are always from the volumes ofActs of the Parliaments of Scotland.

[34]Acts, i. 492. We have no reason for supposing that "proceres" included burgesses, as it is generally used in contradistinction to them.

[34]Acts, i. 492. We have no reason for supposing that "proceres" included burgesses, as it is generally used in contradistinction to them.

[35]"Plebanos, qui ad parliamentum non erunt, nec voluerint promittere interesse ibidem."

[35]"Plebanos, qui ad parliamentum non erunt, nec voluerint promittere interesse ibidem."

[36]Although the burgesses had thus successfully asserted their right to a place in Parliament, the theory was not at once extended to the meetings known as conventions, which could impose taxes, and possessed every parliamentary power except that of passing general laws. In 1503 an act was passed, ordering that "commissioners and head men of burghs be warned" to attend conventions; but it had to be re-enacted in 1563, and even after that date it was not completely operative. Between 1566 (the first date of their recorded presence) and the end of the sixteenth century burgesses were present at only half of the conventions which were held. It is important to note that the royal burghs alone had parliamentary representation up to the year 1832.

[36]Although the burgesses had thus successfully asserted their right to a place in Parliament, the theory was not at once extended to the meetings known as conventions, which could impose taxes, and possessed every parliamentary power except that of passing general laws. In 1503 an act was passed, ordering that "commissioners and head men of burghs be warned" to attend conventions; but it had to be re-enacted in 1563, and even after that date it was not completely operative. Between 1566 (the first date of their recorded presence) and the end of the sixteenth century burgesses were present at only half of the conventions which were held. It is important to note that the royal burghs alone had parliamentary representation up to the year 1832.

[37]We have no evidence that the Court of the Four Burghs was in any sense strictly representative.

[37]We have no evidence that the Court of the Four Burghs was in any sense strictly representative.

[38]The possible objection that a similar theory of burghal representation has been stated and rejected by English constitutional historians is scarcely applicable. For it is agreed that the idea of representation existed in England before the towns were summoned to Parliament, while in Scotland no such idea is traceable, nor are there any writs such as were issued for the English towns. It might even be argued that, in strict theory, there was no representation in Scotland till 1832; that commissioners both from shires and burghs only saved their fellows the trouble of attendance, the right to attend being, notde factobut in ultimate theory, possessed by all who were entitled to vote. Such a statement is certainly true of the shire, at all events.

[38]The possible objection that a similar theory of burghal representation has been stated and rejected by English constitutional historians is scarcely applicable. For it is agreed that the idea of representation existed in England before the towns were summoned to Parliament, while in Scotland no such idea is traceable, nor are there any writs such as were issued for the English towns. It might even be argued that, in strict theory, there was no representation in Scotland till 1832; that commissioners both from shires and burghs only saved their fellows the trouble of attendance, the right to attend being, notde factobut in ultimate theory, possessed by all who were entitled to vote. Such a statement is certainly true of the shire, at all events.

[39]The chief officers of state were the lord chancellor, the lord high treasurer, and the lord privy seal, who took precedence of all the nobility; the secretary, the clerk of register, the king's advocate, the treasurer's deputy, and the lord justice clerk.

[39]The chief officers of state were the lord chancellor, the lord high treasurer, and the lord privy seal, who took precedence of all the nobility; the secretary, the clerk of register, the king's advocate, the treasurer's deputy, and the lord justice clerk.

[40]They were excluded from 1640 to 1662.

[40]They were excluded from 1640 to 1662.

[41]Acts, i. 491. The use of the term in connection with the coronation of Alexander II in 1214 (Acts, i. 67) is explained by its being simply a quotation from Fordun (ix. 1).

[41]Acts, i. 491. The use of the term in connection with the coronation of Alexander II in 1214 (Acts, i. 67) is explained by its being simply a quotation from Fordun (ix. 1).

[42]Cf.supra, pp. 21-25.

[42]Cf.supra, pp. 21-25.

[43]Cf.supra, pp. 25-26.

[43]Cf.supra, pp. 25-26.

[44]Cf.supra, pp. 18-19.

[44]Cf.supra, pp. 18-19.

[45]Videsupra, p. 24.

[45]Videsupra, p. 24.

[46]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.

[46]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.

[47]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.

[47]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.

[48]The right of prorogation is tacitly assumed by the king in this speech. It was the cause of a dispute in the troublous times which followed 1638. The Parliament of 1640 protested that "Johne, Erle of Traquair, his Majestie's Commissioner, did take upon him without consent of the Estates, upon a private warrand, procured by himself, against his Majestie's publict patent, under the great seall," to prorogue Parliament. They therefore continued to sit, and took up stronger ground, viz. that prorogation without consent of Parliament was "against the lawes and libertie of the kingdom, ... without precedent, example, and practice." The language is clearly taken from the contemporary protests of the English Commons, and it cannot be regarded as more than a political weapon, borrowed for this occasion from the English constitutional armoury. It in no way corresponds with the general state of feeling in Scotland. In 1661 the Estates resolved that "the King hath sole power to call and prorogue Parliaments." Both resolutions were recognitions of fact, not of theory. At various times, from 1398 onwards, acts were passed that Parliament should meet once a year. These were probably connected with the judicial powers of the Estates. In point of fact, they were dead letters.

[48]The right of prorogation is tacitly assumed by the king in this speech. It was the cause of a dispute in the troublous times which followed 1638. The Parliament of 1640 protested that "Johne, Erle of Traquair, his Majestie's Commissioner, did take upon him without consent of the Estates, upon a private warrand, procured by himself, against his Majestie's publict patent, under the great seall," to prorogue Parliament. They therefore continued to sit, and took up stronger ground, viz. that prorogation without consent of Parliament was "against the lawes and libertie of the kingdom, ... without precedent, example, and practice." The language is clearly taken from the contemporary protests of the English Commons, and it cannot be regarded as more than a political weapon, borrowed for this occasion from the English constitutional armoury. It in no way corresponds with the general state of feeling in Scotland. In 1661 the Estates resolved that "the King hath sole power to call and prorogue Parliaments." Both resolutions were recognitions of fact, not of theory. At various times, from 1398 onwards, acts were passed that Parliament should meet once a year. These were probably connected with the judicial powers of the Estates. In point of fact, they were dead letters.

[49]Convocatis tribus communitatibus Regni ... certi personae electi fuerunt per easdem ad parliamentum tenendum, data aliis causa autumpni licencia ad propria redeundi.

[49]Convocatis tribus communitatibus Regni ... certi personae electi fuerunt per easdem ad parliamentum tenendum, data aliis causa autumpni licencia ad propria redeundi.

[50]De concessu et confirmatione trium communitatum congregatarum, propter importunitatem et caristiam temporis ... electi fuerunt certi personae ad ipsum parliamentum tenendum, data licencia aliis remeandi.

[50]De concessu et confirmatione trium communitatum congregatarum, propter importunitatem et caristiam temporis ... electi fuerunt certi personae ad ipsum parliamentum tenendum, data licencia aliis remeandi.

[51]Acts, i. 173.

[51]Acts, i. 173.

[52]Imitando videlicet ordinem illum et modum qui servabantur in parliamento tento apud Perth tempore venerandae memoriae domini Regis David, anno Regni ipsius quadragesimo [1369], electi fuerunt quidam....

[52]Imitando videlicet ordinem illum et modum qui servabantur in parliamento tento apud Perth tempore venerandae memoriae domini Regis David, anno Regni ipsius quadragesimo [1369], electi fuerunt quidam....

[53]Ad tractandum et deliberandum super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis, antequam perveniant ad noticiam consilii generalis, licentiatis autem aliis ut recedant.

[53]Ad tractandum et deliberandum super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis, antequam perveniant ad noticiam consilii generalis, licentiatis autem aliis ut recedant.

[54]De consensu et assensu trium communitatum per presidentes sive per personas electas ad determinationem negociorum in parliamento eodem.

[54]De consensu et assensu trium communitatum per presidentes sive per personas electas ad determinationem negociorum in parliamento eodem.

[55]Primo et principaliter, iuxta predictos modum et ordinem, est ordinatum quod nullus electus ad consilium cuiuscunque conditionis gradus pre-eminentiae sive status alium non electum ad consilium seu in consilio Regis sibi consiliarium vel assessorem aut alia de causa adducat.

[55]Primo et principaliter, iuxta predictos modum et ordinem, est ordinatum quod nullus electus ad consilium cuiuscunque conditionis gradus pre-eminentiae sive status alium non electum ad consilium seu in consilio Regis sibi consiliarium vel assessorem aut alia de causa adducat.

[56]"Comparentibus tribus Regni statibus apud Edinburgh, omnes comites nobiles et barones ac libere tenentes dicti regni...." The omission of the burgesses seems to have attracted the attention of Sir John Skene, who in his edited volume of theActs(temp. Jac. VI) includes the formal revocation in the proceedings of the Parliament of 1437-38, and prints, instead of the somewhat less emphatic words of the original, a statement that the revocation was sanctioned by "the haill three Estates of the Realme, sittand in plane Parliament, that is to say, the Clergie, Barrones, and Commissioners of Burrowes."

[56]"Comparentibus tribus Regni statibus apud Edinburgh, omnes comites nobiles et barones ac libere tenentes dicti regni...." The omission of the burgesses seems to have attracted the attention of Sir John Skene, who in his edited volume of theActs(temp. Jac. VI) includes the formal revocation in the proceedings of the Parliament of 1437-38, and prints, instead of the somewhat less emphatic words of the original, a statement that the revocation was sanctioned by "the haill three Estates of the Realme, sittand in plane Parliament, that is to say, the Clergie, Barrones, and Commissioners of Burrowes."

[57]In 1445, three burgesses, along with fifteen of the clergy and barons, attest the erection of the lordship of Hamilton; but there is no further evidence of their being present or taking any part in the parliament of that year.

[57]In 1445, three burgesses, along with fifteen of the clergy and barons, attest the erection of the lordship of Hamilton; but there is no further evidence of their being present or taking any part in the parliament of that year.

[58]From 1467 to 1482 the numbers of the Lords of the Articles were from three to five representatives of each Estate. During the struggles which marked the end of the reign of James III, and before his son had succeeded in asserting the royal power, we find burgesses forming a very small proportion of the Committee of the Articles. The numbers are instructive:YearClergyBaronsBurgesses1483664(Acts, ii. 145.)1485663(Acts, ii. 169.)14889145(Acts, ii. 200.)14898104(Acts, ii. 217.)149110103(Acts, ii. 229.)On the other hand in 1503, under the strong rule of James IV, six clergy, six barons, and seven burgesses were chosen (Acts, ii. 239).

[58]From 1467 to 1482 the numbers of the Lords of the Articles were from three to five representatives of each Estate. During the struggles which marked the end of the reign of James III, and before his son had succeeded in asserting the royal power, we find burgesses forming a very small proportion of the Committee of the Articles. The numbers are instructive:

On the other hand in 1503, under the strong rule of James IV, six clergy, six barons, and seven burgesses were chosen (Acts, ii. 239).

[59]The final form assumed by the Courts of the Four Burghs and the Hanse Burghs.

[59]The final form assumed by the Courts of the Four Burghs and the Hanse Burghs.

[60]It was next employed in 1581.

[60]It was next employed in 1581.

[61]Randolph to Cecil, 3rd June, 1563,Foreign Calendar, Elizabeth.

[61]Randolph to Cecil, 3rd June, 1563,Foreign Calendar, Elizabeth.

[62]Proclamation of James VI, July 1578.

[62]Proclamation of James VI, July 1578.

[63]Acts, ii. 289.

[63]Acts, ii. 289.

[64]Robertson, app. iv. This is the only evidence that we possess to show that the burgesses chose their own representatives.

[64]Robertson, app. iv. This is the only evidence that we possess to show that the burgesses chose their own representatives.

[65]In the speech quotedsupra, pp. 38-39, King James ignores the Lords of the Articles altogether.

[65]In the speech quotedsupra, pp. 38-39, King James ignores the Lords of the Articles altogether.

[66]Miscellany of the Maitland Club, iii. 112-18.

[66]Miscellany of the Maitland Club, iii. 112-18.

[67]Afterwards the first earl of Haddington.

[67]Afterwards the first earl of Haddington.

[68]"Humble Supplication of a great number of the Nobility and other Commissioners in the late Parliament,"State Trials, iii. 604. Cf. also Row,History of the Church of Scotland, pp. 365-66 (Wodrow Soc.).

[68]"Humble Supplication of a great number of the Nobility and other Commissioners in the late Parliament,"State Trials, iii. 604. Cf. also Row,History of the Church of Scotland, pp. 365-66 (Wodrow Soc.).

[69]History, vi. 87.

[69]History, vi. 87.

[70]The numbers of the Lords of the Articles varied considerably. In 1587 it was fixed at any number varying from six to ten from each Estate, and this may be taken as fairly representative of their number throughout, though in early times it is somewhat smaller. Cf.supra, p. 48, n.

[70]The numbers of the Lords of the Articles varied considerably. In 1587 it was fixed at any number varying from six to ten from each Estate, and this may be taken as fairly representative of their number throughout, though in early times it is somewhat smaller. Cf.supra, p. 48, n.

[71]The title of "Lord" was early assumed by the president and senators of the College of Justice. The title was prefixed to the surname of the judge, if he did not take a territorial designation. An attempt was made by the wives of the early senators to adopt the corresponding title "Lady," but, according to tradition, their ambition received a check from King James, who remarked: "I made the carls lords, but wha made the carlines ladies?"

[71]The title of "Lord" was early assumed by the president and senators of the College of Justice. The title was prefixed to the surname of the judge, if he did not take a territorial designation. An attempt was made by the wives of the early senators to adopt the corresponding title "Lady," but, according to tradition, their ambition received a check from King James, who remarked: "I made the carls lords, but wha made the carlines ladies?"

[72]The befurred and bedecked gowns and hoods of every Estate are minutely described in an act of 1455.

[72]The befurred and bedecked gowns and hoods of every Estate are minutely described in an act of 1455.

[73]Innes,op. cit., pp. 152-53.

[73]Innes,op. cit., pp. 152-53.

[74]One spectator of the scene remained cold and indifferent. John Knox protested against "such stinking pride of women," and feared that the "targetting of their taillies" (bordering of their robes with tassels) would "provock Goddis vengeance, not onlie against those foolish women, but against the haill Realme" (Laing,Knox, ii. 381).

[74]One spectator of the scene remained cold and indifferent. John Knox protested against "such stinking pride of women," and feared that the "targetting of their taillies" (bordering of their robes with tassels) would "provock Goddis vengeance, not onlie against those foolish women, but against the haill Realme" (Laing,Knox, ii. 381).

[75]Register of the Privy Council, 1600.

[75]Register of the Privy Council, 1600.

[76]Parliament sat, almost invariably, in Edinburgh, from the beginning of the seventeenth century.

[76]Parliament sat, almost invariably, in Edinburgh, from the beginning of the seventeenth century.

[77]The law of treason is stated in book iv of the transcript of Glanvill'sDe Legibus Angliae, entitled "Regiam Maiestatem," and it should be compared with the acts against "Leasing-making" which were published from time to time.

[77]The law of treason is stated in book iv of the transcript of Glanvill'sDe Legibus Angliae, entitled "Regiam Maiestatem," and it should be compared with the acts against "Leasing-making" which were published from time to time.

[78]There are two accounts, in theActs, of the appointment of this Committee. In one place, they are elected to treat of certain special business (super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis—Acts, i. 173), and, in another, of secret business (super certis et specialibus et secretis ... negociis—Acts, i. pp. 507, 508). The lists of members are identical, and only one Committee is intended.

[78]There are two accounts, in theActs, of the appointment of this Committee. In one place, they are elected to treat of certain special business (super certis specialibus Regis et Regni negociis—Acts, i. 173), and, in another, of secret business (super certis et specialibus et secretis ... negociis—Acts, i. pp. 507, 508). The lists of members are identical, and only one Committee is intended.

[79]"In secreta camera domini Regis—in suo secreto concilio."—Acts, i. p. 546.

[79]"In secreta camera domini Regis—in suo secreto concilio."—Acts, i. p. 546.

[80]"In camera sui parliamenti in publico."—Ibid.

[80]"In camera sui parliamenti in publico."—Ibid.

[81]There seem, indeed, to have frequently been two royal councils apart from Parliament, and to the smaller and more carefully selected of these the title of "Secret Council" is applied. At other times, there is evidence of only one advisory council apart from the Estates.

[81]There seem, indeed, to have frequently been two royal councils apart from Parliament, and to the smaller and more carefully selected of these the title of "Secret Council" is applied. At other times, there is evidence of only one advisory council apart from the Estates.

[82]Privy Council Register, vol. i, introd. p. xi.

[82]Privy Council Register, vol. i, introd. p. xi.

[83]Cf. p. 56.

[83]Cf. p. 56.

[84]Cf. p. 56.

[84]Cf. p. 56.

[85]Acts, ii. p. 241.

[85]Acts, ii. p. 241.

[86]Ibid., ii. pp. 215, 220.

[86]Ibid., ii. pp. 215, 220.

[87]Original Cronykil of Scotland, book viii, c. 46.

[87]Original Cronykil of Scotland, book viii, c. 46.

[88]The control of taxation was maintained by Parliament, and the king was informed that the grants were to be used for special purposes. No general statement was made which could be construed into a definite claim of the right of appropriation of supplies. The "Parliament" merely used for a particular purpose the power which at that moment it chanced to possess. It is the absence of any assertion of or struggle for constitutional principle that is ultimately decisive against the "constitutional" theory. When, as here, the nobles had the power, they said they would do certain things, and they did them. But there is no conscious effort, traceable from generation to generation, such as we find in English history.

[88]The control of taxation was maintained by Parliament, and the king was informed that the grants were to be used for special purposes. No general statement was made which could be construed into a definite claim of the right of appropriation of supplies. The "Parliament" merely used for a particular purpose the power which at that moment it chanced to possess. It is the absence of any assertion of or struggle for constitutional principle that is ultimately decisive against the "constitutional" theory. When, as here, the nobles had the power, they said they would do certain things, and they did them. But there is no conscious effort, traceable from generation to generation, such as we find in English history.

[89]Cf. John Riddell,Stewartiana, Edinburgh, 1843.

[89]Cf. John Riddell,Stewartiana, Edinburgh, 1843.

[90]Tytler,History of Scotland, iii. 26.

[90]Tytler,History of Scotland, iii. 26.

[91]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 351.

[91]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 351.

[92]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 373.

[92]Burton,History of Scotland, ii. 373.

[93]A declaration was made to Parliament regarding Rothesay's death, in answer to rumours against Albany. But this was merely a formal protest of innocence made to a semi-judicial body.

[93]A declaration was made to Parliament regarding Rothesay's death, in answer to rumours against Albany. But this was merely a formal protest of innocence made to a semi-judicial body.

[94]It may be remarked that the Act does not say that "in all time coming" a king or a regent is to be responsible, although it endows Rothesay with all the powers of a king. It was passed solely with reference to the immediate circumstances.

[94]It may be remarked that the Act does not say that "in all time coming" a king or a regent is to be responsible, although it endows Rothesay with all the powers of a king. It was passed solely with reference to the immediate circumstances.

[95]Acts against "baratry"—i.e.the purchase of benefices at Rome.

[95]Acts against "baratry"—i.e.the purchase of benefices at Rome.

[96]The king's interest in the maintenance of justice is illustrated by Fordun's well-known story that, on his return to Scotland, when he found the misery caused by the incompetence and negligence of the second Albany, he vowed to devote his life to the restoration of order: "Si Deus mihi vitam dederit, ipso auxiliante, et vitam saltem mihi caninam praestante, faciam per universum regnum clavem castrum, et dumetum vaccam, absque possessoris ambiguo ad modum custodire" (Scotichronicon, xv. 34).

[96]The king's interest in the maintenance of justice is illustrated by Fordun's well-known story that, on his return to Scotland, when he found the misery caused by the incompetence and negligence of the second Albany, he vowed to devote his life to the restoration of order: "Si Deus mihi vitam dederit, ipso auxiliante, et vitam saltem mihi caninam praestante, faciam per universum regnum clavem castrum, et dumetum vaccam, absque possessoris ambiguo ad modum custodire" (Scotichronicon, xv. 34).

[97]King James VI,Basilikon Doron, Book ii.

[97]King James VI,Basilikon Doron, Book ii.

[98]The picture of Graham, the king's murderer, as an outraged exponent of constitutionalism is a pious imagination.

[98]The picture of Graham, the king's murderer, as an outraged exponent of constitutionalism is a pious imagination.

[99]This has been viewed as a serious constitutional claim (e.g.Ridpath,op. cit., p. 4), and it illustrates the type of error on which the "constitutional" theory has thriven.

[99]This has been viewed as a serious constitutional claim (e.g.Ridpath,op. cit., p. 4), and it illustrates the type of error on which the "constitutional" theory has thriven.

[100]Edition of 1778, p. 24.

[100]Edition of 1778, p. 24.

[101]Basilikon Doron, Book ii.

[101]Basilikon Doron, Book ii.

[102]There is no evidence that the Estates knew anything about this war.

[102]There is no evidence that the Estates knew anything about this war.

[103]The only incident that tells for the "constitutional" interpretation is the refusal of the Lords of the Articles to allow the king to aid Louis XI of France in 1473. But the action of the Estates was simply the action of the chancellor, Evandale, and his party, who ruled the king with a rod of iron. It is very likely that there was, especially among the clergy, a strong general feeling against going to war, and this feeling strengthened the king's jailers. But the opposition of a small ruling clique of nobles to the whim of a powerless monarch is scarcely to be regarded as a great constitutional fact. It must also be remembered that the few who constituted the Lords of the Articles were virtually the Estates.

[103]The only incident that tells for the "constitutional" interpretation is the refusal of the Lords of the Articles to allow the king to aid Louis XI of France in 1473. But the action of the Estates was simply the action of the chancellor, Evandale, and his party, who ruled the king with a rod of iron. It is very likely that there was, especially among the clergy, a strong general feeling against going to war, and this feeling strengthened the king's jailers. But the opposition of a small ruling clique of nobles to the whim of a powerless monarch is scarcely to be regarded as a great constitutional fact. It must also be remembered that the few who constituted the Lords of the Articles were virtually the Estates.

[104]William Elphinstone.

[104]William Elphinstone.

[105]History of Greater Britain, p. 352 (Scottish Hist. Soc. ed.).

[105]History of Greater Britain, p. 352 (Scottish Hist. Soc. ed.).

[106]Pedro de Ayala to Ferdinand and Isabella, 25 July 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. no. 210). The context shows that the remark was incidental, and was induced by an allusion by the ambassador to the king's behaviour in battle.

[106]Pedro de Ayala to Ferdinand and Isabella, 25 July 1498 (Spanish Calendar, i. no. 210). The context shows that the remark was incidental, and was induced by an allusion by the ambassador to the king's behaviour in battle.

[107]Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen, pp. 102-5 (New Spalding Club ed.).

[107]Lives of the Bishops of Aberdeen, pp. 102-5 (New Spalding Club ed.).

[108]The burgesses and "a parte of the nobilitie" had petitioned for the act (Laing,Knox, i. 100).

[108]The burgesses and "a parte of the nobilitie" had petitioned for the act (Laing,Knox, i. 100).

[109]In 1558, indeed, before the outbreak of hostilities, the Lords of the Congregation asked the queen-regent to abrogate the acts against heresy, and Mary made the pretext of her refusal the difficulty of obtaining the consent of the prelates (Spottiswood,History of the Church of Scotland, sub anno 1558).

[109]In 1558, indeed, before the outbreak of hostilities, the Lords of the Congregation asked the queen-regent to abrogate the acts against heresy, and Mary made the pretext of her refusal the difficulty of obtaining the consent of the prelates (Spottiswood,History of the Church of Scotland, sub anno 1558).

[110]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.

[110]Laing,Knox, ii. 87.

[111]For other important points in connection with this Parliament, cf.supra, pp. 24-5.

[111]For other important points in connection with this Parliament, cf.supra, pp. 24-5.

[112]Autobiography and Diary of Mr. James Melville, p. 370 (Wodrow Society). The year is 1596.

[112]Autobiography and Diary of Mr. James Melville, p. 370 (Wodrow Society). The year is 1596.

[113]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, i. 329, 362, &c. (Maitland Club).

[113]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, i. 329, 362, &c. (Maitland Club).

[114]Ibid.i. 59.

[114]Ibid.i. 59.

[115]Ibid.i. 506.

[115]Ibid.i. 506.

[116]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, passim.

[116]The Book of the Universall Kirk of Scotland, passim.

[117]"We farther give over in the hands and power of the devill the said N., to the destruction of his flesh; straitlie charging all that professe the Lord Jesus, to whose knowledge this our sentence sall come, to repute and hold the said N. accursed, and unworthie of the familiar societie of Christians; declaring unto all men that suche as hereafter, before his repentance, sall haunt or familiarlie accompanie him, are partakers of his impietie and subject to the like condemnation."—Sentence of excommunication in theFirst Book of Discipline.

[117]"We farther give over in the hands and power of the devill the said N., to the destruction of his flesh; straitlie charging all that professe the Lord Jesus, to whose knowledge this our sentence sall come, to repute and hold the said N. accursed, and unworthie of the familiar societie of Christians; declaring unto all men that suche as hereafter, before his repentance, sall haunt or familiarlie accompanie him, are partakers of his impietie and subject to the like condemnation."—Sentence of excommunication in theFirst Book of Discipline.

[118]Calderwood,Historie of the Kirk of Scotland, v. 341-2 (Wodrow Society).

[118]Calderwood,Historie of the Kirk of Scotland, v. 341-2 (Wodrow Society).

[119]Ibid. pp. 396-7.

[119]Ibid. pp. 396-7.

[120]Cf.Presbytery Examined: an Essay on the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland since the Reformation, by the late Duke of Argyll; and the various books on Scottish Church history.

[120]Cf.Presbytery Examined: an Essay on the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland since the Reformation, by the late Duke of Argyll; and the various books on Scottish Church history.

[121]The same Parliament asked the council to bring forward its evidence against Mary. If we knew all that lay behind this motion, we should probably possess a key to the problems on which so much ingenuity has been exercised. The statement, frequently quoted, that the Estates passed a solemn resolution affirming their power to depose the sovereign rests solely on the authority of Buchanan, and is directly antagonistic to the language both of theActsand of the Scottish commissioners' protestations at York and Westminster, in which Mary is represented as abdicating of her own free will.

[121]The same Parliament asked the council to bring forward its evidence against Mary. If we knew all that lay behind this motion, we should probably possess a key to the problems on which so much ingenuity has been exercised. The statement, frequently quoted, that the Estates passed a solemn resolution affirming their power to depose the sovereign rests solely on the authority of Buchanan, and is directly antagonistic to the language both of theActsand of the Scottish commissioners' protestations at York and Westminster, in which Mary is represented as abdicating of her own free will.

[122]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.

[122]Speech at Whitehall, 31st March, 1607.

[123]"A Perfect Description of the People and Country of Scotland," printed in theAbbotsford Miscellany.

[123]"A Perfect Description of the People and Country of Scotland," printed in theAbbotsford Miscellany.

[124]"Answer to the 'Perfect Description',"Ibid.

[124]"Answer to the 'Perfect Description',"Ibid.

[125]Hacket,Scrinia Reserata.

[125]Hacket,Scrinia Reserata.

[126]Letter of the Estates to the Assembly, 17th July, 1641 (Acts, v. 625).

[126]Letter of the Estates to the Assembly, 17th July, 1641 (Acts, v. 625).

[127]Some Brieffe Memorialls and Passages of Church and State from 1641-49 (Historical Works of Sir James Balfour, vol. iii.).

[127]Some Brieffe Memorialls and Passages of Church and State from 1641-49 (Historical Works of Sir James Balfour, vol. iii.).

[128]Cf.Scotland and the Commonwealth, ed. Firth (Scottish Hist. Soc.).

[128]Cf.Scotland and the Commonwealth, ed. Firth (Scottish Hist. Soc.).

[129]Principal Baillie's Letters and Journals, iii. 225-26, ed. Laing.

[129]Principal Baillie's Letters and Journals, iii. 225-26, ed. Laing.

[130]The Government of Scotland during the Commonwealth(Acts, vol. vi, pt. 2). See also Mr. Firth's volumesScotland under the CommonwealthandScotland and the Protectorate(Scottish History Society).

[130]The Government of Scotland during the Commonwealth(Acts, vol. vi, pt. 2). See also Mr. Firth's volumesScotland under the CommonwealthandScotland and the Protectorate(Scottish History Society).

[131]Middleton, Appendix, &c.,ut supra.

[131]Middleton, Appendix, &c.,ut supra.

[132]Report on the State and Condition of the Burghs of Scotland, 1692 (Miscellany of the Scottish Burgh Record Soc.).

[132]Report on the State and Condition of the Burghs of Scotland, 1692 (Miscellany of the Scottish Burgh Record Soc.).

[133]The main heads of James's delinquencies were: (1) erecting schools and societies of Jesuits, &c.; (2) making papists great officers of state; (3) enforcing oaths contrary to law; (4) taxation and the maintenance of a standing army without consent of Parliament; (5) the employment of military officers as judges; (6) exorbitant fines; (7) illegal imprisonment; (8) forfeitures by obsolete laws; (9) subversion of rights of royal burghs; (10) interference with justice.

[133]The main heads of James's delinquencies were: (1) erecting schools and societies of Jesuits, &c.; (2) making papists great officers of state; (3) enforcing oaths contrary to law; (4) taxation and the maintenance of a standing army without consent of Parliament; (5) the employment of military officers as judges; (6) exorbitant fines; (7) illegal imprisonment; (8) forfeitures by obsolete laws; (9) subversion of rights of royal burghs; (10) interference with justice.

[134]In spite of the irritating interferences which provoked the indignant rhetoric of Fletcher of Saltoun, and these had reference mainly to peace and war, the maintenance of an army, and places and pensions.

[134]In spite of the irritating interferences which provoked the indignant rhetoric of Fletcher of Saltoun, and these had reference mainly to peace and war, the maintenance of an army, and places and pensions.

[135]Party names here for the first time in strictly parliamentary history. The Resolutioners and Protestors of 1649 were religious divisions.

[135]Party names here for the first time in strictly parliamentary history. The Resolutioners and Protestors of 1649 were religious divisions.

[136]Cf. the present writer's Map of the Parliamentary Representation of Scotland, in Mr. R. L. Poole'sHistorical Atlas. (No. XXVIII.)

[136]Cf. the present writer's Map of the Parliamentary Representation of Scotland, in Mr. R. L. Poole'sHistorical Atlas. (No. XXVIII.)

Back to IndexNext