143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑
143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑
143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑
143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑
143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑
143Stuart, Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon, pp. 342, 343, ed. Davidson.↑
144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑
144Song of Songs, &c., Preface, p. 19.↑
145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑
145An Article on Solomon’s Song, by the Rev. C. E. Stowe, D.D., Professor of Biblical Literature, reprinted in Kitto’s Journal of Sacred Literature, 1852, pp. 331, 332.↑
146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑
146Reply to Dr. Pye Smith, Congregational Magazine for 1838, pp. 148, 149.↑
147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑
147Praef. in Canticum Canticorum, Œuvres, tom. i. p. 467, 4to. edit.↑
148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑
148Lecture xxxi. p. 350, third edition.↑
149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑
149Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, vol. ii. p. 215,et seqq.↑
150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑
150The author of the poem. The singer sometimes puts his own name in the place of this.↑
151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑
151Tá-Há is a name of the Arabian prophet.↑
152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑
152Crishna continues to this hour the darling god of the Indian women. The sect of Hindoos, who adore him with enthusiastic and almost exclusive devotion, have broached a doctrine which they maintain with eagerness, and which seems general in those provinces, that he was distinct from all theAvatars, who had only anansa, or portion of his divinity; while Crishna was the person of Vishnu himself in a human form.—Sir W. Jones,Asiatic Researches, vol. i. p. 260.↑
153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑
153Noyes, A New Translation of the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Canticles, pp. 130–132.↑
154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑
154Historia Crit. Vet. Test. l. i. c. iv. p. 28.↑