A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
There stands in the Grove of Academe, or so I have often imagined, a certain idolatrous image. It is a crane-like creature with italic wings, the great godIbid., and before it, strutting on their tiny six-point feet, the pedant peacocks daily make obeisance. They look up,supra, and downinfra, and spreading their tails with asterisk eyes, they march with robed scholars to lay garlands ofop. cit.upon the ritual shrine.
When I launched into this book, I swore a blasphemous oath upon such phony veneration. After a long life of reading footnotes, and reading them religiously, I have concluded that 98.2 per cent of them are so much flummery: They are showin’ off befo’ God. Thus I had not planned upon notes or bibliography, and this extended note is afterthought; it is the reluctant consequence of listening to beguiling editors. They said: Where did you get all this stuff? Whence these bizarre ideas? They said: Serious students will want to know where to get supporting material intended to prove (a) that you are a fraud, or (b) that there may be something to the Southern position after all. You ought to gird up your Gothic archness with a few flying buttresses of attribution. And in a moment of weakness, I said very well.
The figures on population, area, wages, housing, and the like, in the opening pages of this book, come primarily from the 1960 Census and theStatistical Abstract of the United States for 1961. The Census people have a diabolical genius for presenting their data in the least usable possible form, but they have a monopoly on the figures and no other source exists.
As for the nature of the South: Almost every Southerner who writes for a living at one time or another has wooed this elusive theme. I would suggest that a student start with W. J. Cash’sThe Mind of the South, not because I agree with everything Cash had to say, but because his brief star flashed with a rare brilliance across the Southern sky. TheKnopf edition of 1941 is now available in a Doubleday Anchor paperback, and though parts of it are dated, it continues to offer a good basic foundation. Then, at random, William Alexander Percy’sLanterns on the Levee, and David Cohn’sWhere I Was Born and Raised. The late William Polk of Greensboro, N.C., was a delightful gentleman; during an editorial writers’ convention in Boston, we once talked of the South’s problems between the bumps and grinds of an Old Howard Burly-Q. His book,Southern Accent(1953) is fine background reading. Although they are hard to find, Ward Allison Dorrance’s several books on Southern rivers are worth the effort. Some good essays appear inThe Lasting South(1957), a collection edited largely by Louis D. Rubin, Jr., though my own name is on the spine too.
A great many other books about the South come to mind. Henry Grady’sThe New South, published in 1890, is almost indispensable. Another necessary work, of seminal influence, is the Agrarians’I’ll Take My Standof 1930. I come back frequently to Matthew Page Andrews’Virginia, The Old Dominion. C. Vann Woodward’s several books are useful:The Burden of Southern History,Origins of the New South, andThe Strange Career of Jim Crow. The serious student’s reading list would find a place forSeeds of Time, by Henry Savage, Jr.;Southern Tradition and Regional Progress, by William H. Nicholls;The Southern Heritage, by James McBride Dabbs, andGoodbye to Uncle Tom, by J. C. Furnas. Thomas D. Clark’sThe Emerging Southis good on economic history. Virginius Dabney’sBelow the Potomac, published in 1942, remains a solid work. Bernard Robb’sWelcum Hingesis at once gentle and delightful. The student should not pass by Harry Ashmore’sEpitaph for Dixie(1958) andThe Other Side of Jordan(1960). And of course, before it gets overlooked by reason of its bulk and importance, the multi-volumed history of the South emerging from Louisiana State University Press is a primary reference.
Many of the foregoing titles—alas, almost all of them—are the work of Southern Liberals. And I do not seem to have mentioned P. D. East’sThe Magnolia Jungle, or Hodding Carter’sSouthern LegacyandWhere the Main Street Meets the River, andThe South Strikes Back, or RobertPenn Warren’sSegregation, or Jonathan Daniels’A Southerner Discovers the SouthandFrontier on the Potomac. Nearly all the recent crop of books are cast in molds more liberal yet: Carl T. Rowan’sGo South to Sorrow; John Howard Griffin’sBlack Like Me, and Richard Wright’sWhite Man, Listen!Wilma Dykeman and James Stokely have co-authored two books worth serious thought:Neither Black nor White, andSeeds of Southern Change. A student’s shelf should leave a place for William Peters’The Southern Temper. Several books of largely contemporary, topical interest should be read: Martin Luther King’s account of the Montgomery boycott,Stride Toward Freedom; Bishop Robert R. Brown’sBigger Than Little Rock; Virgil T. Blossom’sIt Has Happened Here; and John Bartlow Martin’s generally well-balancedThe Deep South Says Never. Martin’s book is the work of a professional reporter. Most of the rest of the books mentioned in this paragraph annoyed the hell out of me.
Against this monstrous amount of sack, one finds but a penny’s worth of bread. The conservative South has not lacked willing spokesmen; it has lacked agreeable publishers. A bare handful of works present a contrary view, and some of these—Herman Talmadge’sYou and Segregation, and W. E. Debnam’s impudentWeep No More, My Lady, andMy Old Kentucky Home, Good Night—are in paperback. The scant list of hardcover works espousing the point of view of several million white Southerners includes only Bill Workman’sThe Case for the South(1960), Carleton Putnam’sRace and Reason, a Yankee View, and my ownThe Sovereign States(1957), a book I still like very much. (There is also Charles P. Bloch’s lawyerlyStates Rights: The Law of the Land, but that probably should be mentioned later in books on legal aspects of the question.)
One scarcely knows where to begin on books dealing with the Negro as such. The literature in this field is unending. In fairness, the student should seek out a couple of books that advance the traditional Southern view: Earnest Sevier Cox’sWhite America(1923) and, from as far back as 1910, E. H. Randle’s slimCharacteristics of the Southern Negro. In the same year that Randle wrote his book, an English critic, William Archer, brought forthThrough Afro-America.These three works are period pieces now, but they still have value.
I have relied heavily in writing this book on Nathaniel Weyl’sThe Negro in American Civilization. Needless to say, a hundred other works are arrayed against his point of view. The student doubtless will have to begin with almost anything from W. E. B. DuBois, keeping in mind that DuBois, the grand old Red of the NAACP, formally joined the Communist Party in 1961. His works are important, nonetheless. Jerome Dowd’sThe Negro in American Life(1926) is long, and outdated, but still most useful. A thoughtful reader will find a few hours for Tuskegee’s Robert R. Moton; his autobiography of 1920,Finding a Way Out, even then predicted a day when the white South would “stop feeling and begin thinking” about its Negro problem, and hisWhat the Negro Thinks(1929) offers an insight into the continuing nature of Negro goals. A more militant work by the NAACP’s James Weldon Johnson,Negro Americans, What Now?appeared in 1934. And thinking of the NAACP, Mary White Ovington’sThe Walls Came Tumbling Down(1947) contains some material not available elsewhere.
Of more recent vintage, half a dozen studies of the Negro deserve mention as reference works. Primus, of course, the monumental (and monumentally unreadable) work of Gunnar Myrdal and his associates,An American Dilemma. There are said to be eleven persons in the United States, apart from the collaborators, who have read the whole two volumes; I am not among them. But I ploughed through most of it. Arnold Rose, Myrdal’s chief assistant, has brought out a condensation, published in 1948 asThe Negro in America. Rayford W. Logan of Howard University, one of the most prolific writers in the field, has produced a number of works of substantial value, among themThe Negro in American Life and ThoughtandThe Negro in the Postwar World. His colleague, Edward Franklin Frazier, also has published extensively; hisThe Negro in the United States(1957) is quite useful. Still another Negro writer, Arna Werdell Bontemps, should be consulted through her100 Years of Negro Freedom. An interesting work that I came across after this manuscriptwas finished is Gilbert Franklin Edwards’The Negro Professional Class(1959).
In the narrower field of political action, the general reader should begin with V. O. Key’s major work,Southern Politics in State and Nation, which sets the scene, and then go back to William Felbert Nowlin’s work of 1931,The Negro in American National Politics. A good contemporary work isThe Negro and Southern Politics, by Hugh Douglas White. Of less value, in part because of its arrogant tone, is Henry Lee Moon’s polemicalBalance of Power: The Negro Vote(a typical reference is to the “political zombies who infest the sub-Potomac region”). Report of the Civil Rights Commission and the Southern Regional Council are indispensable.
For the absolute amateur, coming cold into the field of anthropology, E. E. Evans-Pritchard’s BBC lectures,Social Anthropology, offer a most congenial introduction. This should be followed, I suggest, by Alfred Louis Kroeber’sAnthropology, originally published in 1923 and updated in 1948. It is hard work. Then, in a hard-driving rush: Ralph Linton’sThe Tree of Culture, Carleton S. Coon’sThe Story of Man, Hooton’sApes, Men and MoronsandUp from the Ape, Clyde Kluckhohn’sMirror for Man; almost anything by Toynbee and Breasted; and warming to the more immediate theme, Franz Boas’Anthropology and Modern Life(1928) and hisRace, Language and Culture(1940). Boas was the great-granddaddy of the whole Liberal movement in social anthropology; he influenced a generation or more of dutiful followers. Melville Herskovits, of Northwestern, has written (1943) an agreeable biography of him. It merits a reading. And so do Herskovits’ own works,The American Negro(1928) and his more definitiveThe Myth of the Negro Past(1958). Otto Klineberg’s works are important:Negro Intelligence and Selective Migration(1935) and the useful anthology,Characteristics of the American Negro(1944). The famous UNESCO pamphlet on race has been covered in the text; Ruth Benedict and Gene Weltfish belong in a footnote. A very small footnote. Ashley Montagu, a monstrously irritating man, has to be read, or at least scratched:Man: His First Million Years,Human Heredity, andMan in Process. This last work I fetched home only aweek ago. I do not like Ashley Montagu. Langston Hughes’African Treasuryis about what you would imagine Hughes would put out. Better, on African background, are John Coleman De Graft-Johnson’sAfrican Glory: The Story of Vanished Negro Civilizations(1955) and Maurice Delafosse’sThe Negroes of Africa(1931). But the bibliography in this area is extensive, and it grows more rapturous all the time.The African Colonization Movement, by P. J. Staudenraus (1961) is as good a roundup of this early nineteenth-century movement as I have come across.
In the text, I have called attention to Dr. Audrey M. Shuey’sTesting of Negro Intelligence. Let me call repeated attention to it here. This is an indispensable reference work, of unimpeachable integrity, for any student who proposes seriously to investigate Negro scores on intelligence tests. The student also should seek out Dr. Henry E. Garrett’sGreat Experiments in Psychology(1951), and he should get his subscription in toMankind Quarterly, 1 Darnaway St., Edinburgh 3, Scotland. At the University of Chicago, Dr. Dwight J. Ingle has demonstrated a fierce and wonderful courage in admitting unorthodox views to hisPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, in which Dr. Montagu has been recently skewered.
This gets me, by hop, skip and jump, to reference works in the area of Constitutional history, law, and contemporary politics. TheFederalist, of course. Elliot’sDebates. Madison’sNotes. Tocqueville. Jefferson’s Letters. Madison. There is no stopping point. The biographies of Marshall and Washington. James Morton Smith’sFreedom’s Fetters. Bibliography is futile. The student of the Constitution will read a thousand works, and then read a thousand more. He shouldn’t miss Charles Warren’sThe Supreme Court in U.S. History. Yale’s Fred Rodell is a derisive fellow; hisNine Menis a fine, extended raspberry cheer, but it should be read. Most of the members of the Court have been loquacious; they cannot keep their tongues tied down. The law reviews fairly bulge with important material. Robert B. McKay’s long essay in theNew York University Law Review(June, 1956) is no help to my position, but it merits a reading. Basic source material, of course, is available through the indispensableRace Relations Law Reporter. The student interested in getting both sides of this dispute should look up Senator Eastland’s “Era of Judicial Tyranny,” available through the Citizens Council, and Alfred J. Schweppe’s article in the American Bar Association’sJournalof February, 1958, “Enforcement of Federal Court Decrees.” On the question of private schools, a biased and snippy book by Donald Ross and Warren E. Gauerke,If the Schools Are Closed, merits a reading. The two Emory professors are anti-private school, but the source material is there. I have already mentioned Charles J. Bloch’sStates Rights: The Law of the Land; it is a first-rate piece of work.
On the Fourteenth Amendment: Joseph B. James’ work is basic,The Framing of the Fourteenth Amendment(1956). See also Walter J. Suthon’s article in theTulane Law Reviewat December, 1953, “The Dubious Origin of the Fourteenth Amendment”; Horace E. Flack’s “The Adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment,” inJohn Hopkins Studies(1908), and Joseph F. Ingham’s “Unconstitutional Amendments,” in theDickinson Law Reviewof March, 1929, among many other sources.
It is futile to attempt any bibliographical note on the specific subject of school desegregation since 1954. The library of the Southern Educational Reporting Service in Nashvilleis a storehouseof material to be found nowhere else. I am indebted to Reed Sarratt and his associates there for making its riches available to me. Don Shoemaker’sWith All Deliberate Speed; Harry Ashmore’sThe Negro and the Schools; andPublic Education in the South Today and Tomorrow, by Ernst W. Swanson and John A. Griffin (1955), are basic references. Any serious study must take in the annual reports of the various Southern State superintendents of public education. Bill Simmons, the urbane and immensely attractive executive director of the Citizens Council in Jackson, Miss., has a wealth of material available; student debaters who get stuck with the Southern side of the question should not hesitate to write him at the Plaza Building in Jackson.
This is about all the bibliography I am up to. Any student who delves into this subject necessarily will resortimmediately to the Periodical Index. It teems with magazine references. Offhand, I know of not more than a dozen articles that present some aspects of the traditional Southern view—this, out ofmore than two thousandindexed articles supporting the integrationist view since 1954. Look them up: Clifford Dowdey, inSaturday Reviewof Oct. 9, 1954; Senator Ervin, inLookof April 3, 1956; Herbert Ravebel Sass, inAtlanticof November 1956; Tom Waring, inHarper’s, January 1956; Virginius Dabney, inLifeof Sept. 22, 1958; William F. Buckley, Jr., inSaturday Reviewof Nov. 11, 1961; Perry Morgan, inEsquirefor January, 1962; Donald R. Davidson in theStar Weekly Magazinefor Nov. 9, 1957. There may have been a few others. The Citizens Council has a wealth of pamphlets, booklets, and other ephemera available to the student who troubles to ask for reference material. And of course the microfilmed resources of the Southern Educational Reporting Service are invaluable.
I owe thanks to my right arm, Ann Lloyd Merriman; and to my publisher in Richmond, D. Tennant Bryan; and to the librarians of the State Law Library, the Library of Congress, and the state and city libraries in Richmond; to my congenial masters at Collier Books; to Dr. Henry E. Garrett; to John Riely, attorney, who made available to me the briefs of all parties in the School Segregation Cases; to various antagonists of the NAACP, among them Thurgood Marshall and Spotswood Robinson III. And the day this book appears, in glancing over this incomplete and sketchy note, I will think of a hundred other sources and mentors to whom I shall ever be
Gratefully theirs,
J.J.K.
July, 1962.