The Bohemian,Joseph Zyka,[139]was about twenty yearsolder than Jos. Baptist Mara. He received his education as Violoncellist at Prague, and belonged, from 1743-1764, to the Electoral band in Dresden. He then went with his sonFreiderich, who was likewise a good cellist, as chamber musician to Berlin, where, according to Fétis, in 1791, he died; but, according to Fürstenau, at the beginning of our century. He is said to have left behind him, in manuscript, several Concertos.
Johann Hettischis distinguished as a remarkable Violoncellist. Born in 1748, in the Bohemian town Liblin, he was educated at the Piaristi College at Schlan, and then went to Prague in order to train as a musician. There he still was in the year 1772. Later, and indeed in 1788, he was, as Gerber asserts, employed at Lemberg in the Imperial civil service, from which it appears that in the flower of his age he had abandoned the practice of Art as a vocation. His playing seems to have been distinguished especially for its rich tone. According to Fétis, he left several Concertos and Cello Solos in manuscript.
The Catholic priest,Franz Mensi, born on March 27, 1753, at Bistra, where his father was tutor to Count Hohenems, early occupied himself with music, and when his parents went to Prague he became Joseph Reicha’s pupil for Violoncello playing while Cajetan Vogel instructed him in theory. Mensi also played the Violin. On both instruments he was considered clever, and not less so in composition. Some of his works, which consist of church music, Symphonies, and Quartets, are said to be preserved in the convent at Strahow. In the year 1808, Mensi was still living and working as curé at Pher. He also had some pupils, amongst these wereJoh. Brodeczky,Wenzel Czižek, and CountSpork.
J. Stiastny(Stiasny) should be mentioned as one of the most distinguished Bohemian Cellists. He was born in Bohemia (according to Fétis at Prague) in 1774. The information regarding his education and his life are very limited. He is said to have been in the Prague Orchestra in 1800. On the title-page of his Op. 3, consisting of a Divertimento for Violoncello, he describes himself as Violoncellist to the Grand Duke at Frankfort. As the brief existence of theGrand Duchy of Frankfort, of which the Regent was Prince Primate of Dalberg, occurred within the years 1810-1814, there can scarcely be a doubt that Stiastny resided at Frankfort during that time. Later, about 1820, he bore the title of “Musical Director of Nuremberg,” and in that year lived at Mannheim. He appears to have gone from there to Great Britain, for many of his later works—as, for example, the “Trois Duos Concertans” (Op. 8) and the “Sixpièces faciles” (Op. 9)—are dedicated to Englishmen. Amongst these compositions the Concertino (Op. 7), dedicated to Robert Lindley, may be favourably distinguished from similar productions among the Cello compositions at that period. The remaining Cello pieces of J. Stiastny, which consist of Variations (Op. 10), Rondo and Variations (Op. 12), two Sonatas with Bass (Op. 2), twelve light pieces for two Cellos (Op. 4), six similar ones (Op. 5), three Concerted Duos (Op. 6), and Six Solos with Bass (Op. 11) are qualified to be placed amongst the best productions of the older Cello literature, as they contained effects which for that period were entirely novel.
Amongst Stiastny’s pupils,Joseph Valentin Dontwas remarkable for his performances as quartet and orchestra player. Born on April 15, 1776, at Nieder-Georgenthal, in Bohemia, he received instructions from Stiastny in Prague, where he attended the school. In the year 1804 he was enrolled into the opera orchestra of the Vienna Kärnthnerthor Theatre, from which he was transferred to the Burg Theatre orchestra in 1828. On December 14, 1833, he died. His son, named Jacob, is the Viennese violinist, who died on November 18, 1888, and who was well known by the publication of his excellent practical works for the Violin.
Stiastny’s elder brother,Bernhard Wenceslaus, born at Prague, 1770, was also a Violoncellist, and was employed as first performer of his instrument in the orchestra of the Prague Theatre. Six Sonatas for two Violoncellos, and two instruction works were published by him. The first, entitled “Il maëstro e lo scolare, 8 imitazioni e 6 pezzi con fughe per due violoncelli”; the other is a cello school, entitled “Méthode de Violoncelle,” in two parts. This school is carefully worked out, though somewhat too elaborately, and yet not exhaustively;for the complicated technique of cello playing, especially as regards the thumb position, has not received adequate consideration.
Among the younger Bohemian cellists,Wladislaw Aloisis distinguished, who was born June 15, 1860, at Prague, and received his artistic education at the Conservatoire there. At the end of 1878 he went to Kiev, where he gave instruction in the Institute of Music of the Musical Society on the Violoncello and Piano. In this place he remained for seven years. Since September, 1887, he has been occupied as Solo Cellist at the Imperial Theatre, as well as at the Conservatoire in Warsaw.
The Poles have produced a longer list of violoncellists. They began withFranz Xaver Woczitka, a most distinguished artist in his department, who was born in Vienna about 1730. In 1756 he entered the service of the Court of Mecklenburg-Schwerin. He was subsequently member of the Electoral band at Munich, where he died. He left behind him in manuscript Concertos and Sonatas for Violoncello, which were highly prized in their time.
Nicol Zygmantowski, born in 1770, in Poland. Gerber asserts that already, as a child of six years and nine months, he attracted the admiration of all who were witnesses of his artistic proficiency; he died young. The Polish Count Oginski,[140]who was formerly much noted as a composer of Polonaises, says in his “Lettres sur la Musique,” that he had heard Zygmantowski when he was twelve years old, and adds that he possessed a wonderful talent.
Anton Heinrich Radziwill, Count of Otyka and Nieswicz, born on June 13, 1775, in the Grand Duchy of Posen, had a great musical talent, and was not only an agreeable Violoncellist but also a Composer. In the latter capacity he was extensively known through his music to Goethe’s “Faust.”For the Violoncello he published only one work, “Complainte de Marie Stuart,” with Piano accompaniment. The remainder of his published compositions consist of vocal pieces, of which one is arranged with guitar and cello accompaniment. He was appointed by the King of Prussia, in 1815, Governor of the Grand Duchy of Posen, and died in this prominent position on April 7, 1833. He spent a part of the year generally at Berlin. His house there was the centre of artist celebrities.
Korczmiet, properlyKaltschmidt, of German descent, an accomplished virtuoso player, lived and worked, from 1811 to 1817, at Wilna. He had in his possession a magnificent Stradivarius Cello, which had formerly belonged to Count Michael Wielhorsky. This instrument is now in the possession of Davidoff. There are no more particulars extant concerning Korczmiet.
Adam Hermann, born in 1800, at Warsaw, likewise of German descent, was member of the Imperial Opera orchestra, and teacher at the Conservatoire at Warsaw, where, about 1875, he died. During the years 1830-1875 he formed a great number of pupils, of whom, besides his sonAdam, onlyKomorowski,Thalgrün,Moniuszko, andKontskiwill be mentioned.
Adam Hermann, the son, who changed his name into the Polish form ofHermanowski, was born at Warsaw in 1836, received the first Cello instruction from his father, and in 1852 attended the Brussels Conservatoire for further training as a pupil of Servais. Dismissed from there after two years with the first prize, he returned home and undertook successful tours in Poland and Russia. He is at present living in the most absolute retirement at Warsaw.
Ignaz Komorowski, born on February 24, 1824, at Warsaw, belonged for many years to the theatre orchestra there, after which he benefited by the instruction of Adam Hermann, the father. As a composer he attained great popularity in his native land by his charming songs, full of poetical sentiment. He died on October 14, 1857.
Stanislaus Thalgrün, of German descent, was born on August 16, 1843, at Warsaw, and is member of the theatre orchestra in his own country.
Boleslaw Moniuszko, born on October 25, 1845, son of the well-known Polish composer Moniuszko, belongs at the present time to the Warsaw Theatre orchestra.
Finally,Sigismund Kontskisettled in St. Petersburg, after having finished his training under Hermann.
In chronological order, after Hermann (senior), followsSamuel Kossowski, born in Galicia in 1805. He was almost entirely self-taught and, notwithstanding, reached a high degree as a virtuoso on the Violoncello. During the years 1842-1852 he performed at concerts, with success, in Vienna, Berlin, Warsaw, Kiev, &c. He died in 1851 at Kobryn, in the province of Grodno.
Joseph Szablinski, born on June 18, 1809, at Warsaw, was employed as first Cellist at the Imperial Theatre for more than forty years. He was distinguished for his fine tone and pure musical rendering. He was especially famous as a quartet player.
Stanislaus Szczepanowski, born, 1814, at Cracow, was so accomplished as a Violoncello and Guitar player that during the year 1839 he was able to present himself as a Concert-giver with unusual success on both instruments in France and England. He was also favourably heard in Berlin. He died in 1875.
Moritz Karasowski, born on September 22,[141]1823, at Warsaw, was a pupil of Valentin Kratzer, at that time director of music there, for Violoncello and Piano playing, and was, in 1852, member of the Warsaw Theatre orchestra. In the years 1858 and 1860 he travelled for the sake of study and visited Berlin, Vienna, Dresden, Munich, Cologne, and Paris. Since 1864 he has belonged to the Dresden band as Royal Chamber Musician. Besides some compositions for the voice and Violoncello with piano accompaniment, of which “Rêverie du soir,” a Nocturne, and an Elegy are the most important, he published several books in the Polish language—as, for example: “A History of the Polish Opera” (1859), “Haydn’s and Mozart’s Life” (1860 and 1868), “Chopin’s Youth” (Part I. in 1862, Part II. in 1869), and Biographical Sketches of Robert Schumann, Franz Liszt, and Edmund Kretschmer.His most important work in musical literature is “Friedrich Chopin: his Life, his Works, and his Letters.” A German translation of the latter appeared in 1877 which went through two revised and enlarged editions.
Johann Karlowicz, born on May 28, 1836, in Lithuania, received his training as Cellist from Julius Lyko in Wilna, Göbella in Moscow, Sebastian Lee, finally from Servais also in Brussels. For some years he assisted in the instruction at Warsaw Conservatoire. In his native land Karlowicz enjoys the reputation of a learned linguist.
Joseph Adamowski, born in 1862 in Warsaw, perfected his studies—after he had attended the music school in his native city for some time—under Fitzenhagen, at the Moscow Conservatoire, in the years 1877-1883. On his leaving he was distinguished by the presentation of a diploma and of the great silver medal. After he had made some Concert journeys in Poland and Galicia, he was appointed teacher at the Cracow Conservatoire, to which he belonged until 1887. Since then he has been without a post and is only engaged as a Concert player. Adamowski has the reputation of being a clever Violoncellist.
Of Hungarian Violoncellists, only Kletzer and Hegyesi have made themselves known beyond their own country.
Fery Kletzer, born in 1830 in Hungary, travelled during his sixteenth year giving concerts. His performances showed more than ordinary talent, but were wanting in the higher artistic training. He attained, however, to a certain reputation, as his name was at the time frequently mentioned in the newspapers. Since then he has disappeared from public life.
Louis Hegyesiholds a much higher position. He was born on November 3, 1853, at Arpas; at eight years of age he went to Vienna, and there received his first instruction from the Violoncellist, Denis. Later on, he was received into the Vienna Conservatoire and thus became Schlesinger’s pupil. In order still further to prosecute his training he went, in 1865, to Franchomme in Paris. The outbreak of the Franco-German war obliged him, in the summer of 1870, to return to Vienna, where he found a post in the orchestra ofthe Grand Opera. Five years later he took Hilpert’s place in the Florentine Quartet, to which he belonged until it was dissolved. From that time Hegyesi has travelled as a soloist. In 1887 he responded to an invitation to Cologne as first Cellist of the Gürzenich Concerts and teacher at the Rhenish School of Music.
In taking a retrospective glance at the progressive development which Violoncello playing has displayed from the beginning of the present century, it is evident that this branch of Art has reached so great a degree of perfection that it seems scarcely possible it can rise much higher. This result is not only to be ascribed to the deserving work of the leading Violoncellists—and here must be called to mind, besides Romberg and Dotzauer, pre-eminently Friedrich Kummer, Aug. Franchomme, and François Servais—but also to those famous German composers who brought the Violoncello within the sphere of their productions.
Already had Haydn and Mozart appropriated to this noble instrument, in their String Quartets, passages which contributed to the furtherance of the technique and the possibility of expression. Beethoven went much farther even than this. Not only in his String and Pianoforte Trios, as well as in his Quartets, but also in his Sonatas (Op. 5,[142]69, and 102) and in the so-called Triple Concerto (Op. 56), he increased the demands on the Violoncello to such an extent that in certain respects a real impulse was given to the artistic manipulation of the instrument. At the same time, the works referred to had a stimulating effect on the productive work of the future in the field of Cello compositions, which received a considerable accession in regard to Sonatas especially. We will note here only the names of the best known composers, who used theirgenius in this direction. They follow in alphabetical order:W. Sterndale Bennett,Joh. Brahms,Fr. Chopin,Fr. Gernsheim,Edv. Grieg,Ferd. Hiller,Friedrich Kiel,Franz Lachner,Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy,Ignaz Moscheles,Georg Onslow,Joachim Raff,Karl Reinecke,Jos. Rheinberger,Ant. Rubinstein,Charles Saint-Saëns,Xaver Scharwenka,Bernhard Scholz, andW. Taubert.
The following have written Concertos for the Violoncello:Albert Dietrich,E. Eckert,Bernh. Molique,Joach. Raff,Karl Reinecke,Anton Rubinstein,Saint-Saëns,Robert Schumann,W. Taubert, andRob. Volkmann. The Concerto which has lately appeared byJoh. Brahms, for Violin and Violoncello, must also be mentioned.
Besides these there exist a number, by no means small, of greater and lesser Cello compositions, which deserve to be prominently brought forward—as, for example:Max Bruch’s“Kol Nidrei,” Op. 47;Chopin’sIntroduction and Polonaise Brilliant, Op. 3, and Duo Concertant on Themes from “Robert le Diable” (the Cello part is Franchomme’s production);Fr. Gernsheim’sHebrew song, “Elohenu”;Ferd. Hiller’sConcertstück, Op. 104; Duo for Pianoforte and Violoncello, Op. 22, and two Serenades, Op. 109;Fr. Lachner’sSerenade for four Violoncellos, Op. 29, and Elegy for five Violoncellos, Op. 160;Limmer’sTrio for three Violoncellos and Quartet for four Violoncellos;M. Marx’sthree Quartets for four Violoncellos;Maurer’sNocturne for four Violoncellos;Felix Mendelssohn’sVariations for Pianoforte and Violoncello, Op. 17;Ign. Moscheles’sDuo Concertant, Op. 34;L. Pape’ssix Serenades for four Violoncellos;F. E. Reinecke’s“Three Pieces,” Op. 146;Ferd. Ries’s“Air russe varié,” as well as Introduction and Rondo “Sur une danse russe”;Rob. Schumann’sfive “Stücke im Volkston,” Op. 102; and likewiseL. Spohr’sPotpourri for Violin and Violoncello on Themes from “Jessonda.”[143]
If to these be added the numberless compositions which Violoncellists of our century have produced in Concertos,Concert pieces, Variations, Fantasias, and Duets for their instrument, it must be admitted that Violoncello literature in the course of time has increased very extensively.
The “Etudes” compositions for the Violoncello left much to be desired during the first decade of the present century. On this account the theorist Siegfried Wilhelm Dehn, of some consideration in his time, and who occupied himself in his younger years with Cello playing, may have been induced to arrange a portion—twenty-two in number—of the Kreutzer Violin studies for the Violoncello. This work, however, published by him in June, 1831, cannot be accounted a particularly successful accomplishment. The finger and bow technique of the Violoncello require an entirely different manner of treatment from that of the Violin. And as these Studies were written according to the capacities of the latter instrument it is evident they can only be made available in a limited degree for the Violoncello. It is not then to be wondered at that the Kreutzer “Etudes,” transcribed by Dehn with the best intention, should have fallen into oblivion, since Violoncellists have more and more sought after a thoroughly suitable system of “Etudes” literature, which has now grown to be a very rich field. During the last ten years the solo manipulation of the Violoncello has, in certain respects, undergone a change to its advantage in a very remarkable manner. The higher and highest tones of the instrument are no longer unduly preferred, as in Romberg’s time; but the tenor positions, more in accordance with its character, are chiefly used, without, however, neglecting altogether the lower and the higher parts. The execution of passages has greatly gained thereby. In this respect, it is true, the Violoncello cannot rival the Violin in brilliancy and agility. The strings of the former being so much longer and thicker, of which the two lower ones are made of correspondingly stout wire, form a natural impediment to the rapid emission of tones in quick runs and groups. In addition the somewhat muffled, though at the same time powerful and full tone of the deeper strings renders difficult a brilliant execution. This is felt more especially in Violoncello Concertos with full orchestral accompaniment. The Violoncello has, however, this advantage: that it lends itself far less to virtuoso exaggerations and confusionsthan does the easily portable violin, so favourably disposed for every variety of unworthy trifling. The masculine character of the Violoncello, better adapted for subjects of a serious nature, precludes this. But then this instrument does not offer the same wealth in means of execution which the Violin is capable of developing as a solo instrument. In harmonics andpizzicatoindeed it is at least equal to it, but in the speed and flexibility of passages, as well as in double-stopped playing, its limits are defined. It follows that on account of the larger dimensions of the Violoncello, and the character of the instrument, double-stopped combinations are far less suitable for the deeper than for the higher strings, a circumstance of which there is no question at all on the Violin.
One of the strongest points which the Violoncello possesses in its favour is its suitability as a solo instrument inCantilenaplaying, in which it is not surpassed by any other. If the Violin, with melting soprano and tenor-like voice, speaks to us now with maidenly tenderness, now in clear jubilant tones, the Violoncello, grandly moving for the most part in the tenor and bass positions, stirs the soul by its fascinating sonority and its imposing power of intonation, not less than by the pathos of its expression, which by virtue of its peculiar quality of tone more specially belongs to it than to the Violin.
There is no rivalry between the two instruments, but rather do they mutually enhance each other’s power. Even so is it with the themes which devolve on each in the sphere of chamber and orchestral music. It is greatly to be desired that future generations may foster and maintain what has been done for the art of Violoncello playing in so meritorious a manner by unwearied, self-sacrificing labour; but it is to be hoped, at the same time, that the technique of the instrument, so carefully and finely formed, to the subject of which this book is dedicated, may be ever applied in the service of true and noble Art only.
At p.107, I said that only Johann Baptist Baumgärtner’s tutor (p.76) could give an explanation concerning the method practised in Germany, with regard to the fourthfinger in the thumb position, during the second half of the last century. It was only after this was in the press that the title of a second German Violoncello School of that time became known to me. It is that of Kauer, who was formerly distinguished as an operetta composer in Vienna—“Concise explanation how to play the Violoncello”—which appeared in 1788. It may probably be seen from this work of instruction what the opinion was at that time regarding the fourth finger in the case referred to.
In England, the best violoncello as well as violin bow-maker was John Dodd, who lived and died at Kew; indeed, his cello bows are considered superior to his violin bows.SeeEd. Heron Allen “On Violin-making, &c.”
Bartholomew Johnson.
TheGentleman’s Magazineof 1814 records his death thus in the Obituary, February 14: “At Scarborough, in his 104th year, Mr. Barth. Johnson, a celebrated musical character. He possessed to the last a vigorous mind and strong retentive memory.”
In the “History of Scarborough from the earliest date,” by Joseph Brogden Baker, among the biographical notices, is the following:—
“Johnson, Bartholomew.“Johnson, Barth., was born at Wykeham, near Scarborough, October 3rd, 1710. He resided at Scarborough from the time of his apprenticeship to the time of his death. He was for seventy years one of the ‘town waits.’ As a musician, and for the many excellent traits in his character, he universally preserved the esteem of a highly respectable circle of friends. His constitution naturally was vigorous, and he lived to a great age. In 1810 he completed his hundredth year, which was celebrated by a jubilee dinner and musical performance at the Freemasons’ Lodge, Scarborough, and a medal was struck as a memorial of this event; about ten o’clock at night the good old man bore a part in a quartette, performing on the violoncello the bass to a Minuet which he himself had composed upwards of sixty years before. Lord Mulgrave, the Honourable Henry Phipps, the Bailiffs, and about seventy gentlemen, visitors and residents of Scarborough and the neighbourhood, honoured the meeting with their company. Congratulatory lettersfrom the borough members were read, whilst several poetical compositions, suitable to the occasion, from the classic pens of Archdeacon Wrangham and Thomas Hinderwell, Esq., were recited and sung. Lord Mulgrave afterwards commissioned the late J. Jackson, R.A., to paint the portrait of the venerable old man, which was presented to the Corporation by his lordship and now adorns the council chamber of the Town Hall. In 1814 he departed this life in the 104th year of his age.”
“Johnson, Bartholomew.
“Johnson, Barth., was born at Wykeham, near Scarborough, October 3rd, 1710. He resided at Scarborough from the time of his apprenticeship to the time of his death. He was for seventy years one of the ‘town waits.’ As a musician, and for the many excellent traits in his character, he universally preserved the esteem of a highly respectable circle of friends. His constitution naturally was vigorous, and he lived to a great age. In 1810 he completed his hundredth year, which was celebrated by a jubilee dinner and musical performance at the Freemasons’ Lodge, Scarborough, and a medal was struck as a memorial of this event; about ten o’clock at night the good old man bore a part in a quartette, performing on the violoncello the bass to a Minuet which he himself had composed upwards of sixty years before. Lord Mulgrave, the Honourable Henry Phipps, the Bailiffs, and about seventy gentlemen, visitors and residents of Scarborough and the neighbourhood, honoured the meeting with their company. Congratulatory lettersfrom the borough members were read, whilst several poetical compositions, suitable to the occasion, from the classic pens of Archdeacon Wrangham and Thomas Hinderwell, Esq., were recited and sung. Lord Mulgrave afterwards commissioned the late J. Jackson, R.A., to paint the portrait of the venerable old man, which was presented to the Corporation by his lordship and now adorns the council chamber of the Town Hall. In 1814 he departed this life in the 104th year of his age.”
A similar account, from which, perhaps, the above facts were taken, is to be found in “The History and Antiquities of Scarborough,” by Thomas Hinderwell, Esq.
Reinagle.
A whimsical circumstance, which I cannot forbear mentioning, happened to Reinagle:—
The celebrated Mr. Curran introduced himself to Reinagle and invited him to dine with some musical friends at his country house, five miles from Dublin. Reinagle, anxious to embrace the opportunity of enjoying that great man’s society, most willingly assented, upon which Curran, being in great haste, would not permit our musician to seek for any conveyance, but requested him to ride double on his horse. In this ludicrous way, sitting behind Mr. Curran, they reached his house, to the amusement of many friends they met on the road.
Gerle, Hans.—Musica Teusch, auf die Instrument der grossen vnnd kleinen Geygen, auch Lautten, &c. Nürnbergk, 1532.
Danoville, Le Sieur.—L’Art de toucher le dessus et basse de Viole, &c. Paris, 1687.
Ganassi del Fontego, Silvestro.—Part I.Regola Rubertina che insegna sonar la Viola d’archo tastada. Venezia, 1542.
Playford, John.—Breefe Introduction to the skill of Musick for song and Viol. London, 1654.
---- Introduction to the playing on the Viol de Gambo (or Consort Viol). London, 1660.
Robinson, Thomas.—The Schoole of Musicke wherein is taught the method of true fingering of the lute, pandora, orpharion, and viol de gamba. London, 1603.
Rousseau, Jean.—Traité de la viole.Paris, 1687.
Sympson, Christopher.—The Division Violist, or the Introduction to the playing upon a ground; divided in two parts: the first directing the hands, &c. London: John Playford, 1659.
---- A brief Introduction to the Skill of Music, &c. The second book contains instructions for the Viol. London, 1660.
Wodiczka, T.—Méthode nouvelle et facile pour apprendre à joue du par dessus de Viole.Lyons, 1760.
From the middle of the Eighteenth Century up to the present time.[144]
Alexander, Joseph.—Anleitung zum Violoncellspiel. Leipzig, 1802.
Aubert, Pierre François Olivier.—Méthode pour le Violoncelle. Texte français et espagnol.Paris,c. 1800.
Azaïs, Pierre Hyacinthe.—Méthode de Violoncelle.Paris,c.1820 (?)
Baillot, Levasseur, Catel et Baudiot.—Méthode de Violoncelle adoptée par le Conservatoire.Paris, 1805.
---- Method for the Violoncello. Translated by A. Merrick. London, 1850.
Banger, G.—Praktische Violoncellschule.3 Hefte, Op. 35. Offenbach, 1877.
Baudiot, Charles Nicolas.—Méthode de Violoncelle.Two parts, Op. 25. Berlin, 1830.
Baumgärtner, Joseph Baptist.—Instruction de musique théorique et pratique à l’usage du Violoncelle.La Haye, 1774.
Benito, Cosme de.—Nouvelle Méthode élémentaire de Violoncelle.
Berger, Joseph.—Méthode de Violoncelle.Paris, 1800.
Bideau, Dominique.—Grande et nouvelle Méthode raisonnée pour le Violoncelle.Paris, 1802.
Braga, G.—Metodo per Violoncello intieramente riformato.Milan, 1878.
Bréval, Jean Baptiste.—Méthode raisonnée de Violoncelle.Paris, 1804. (This Violoncello School appeared in 1810, in London, translated into English by J. Peile, under the title, “New instruction for the Violoncello, being a complete Key to the Knowledge of that Instrument.”)
Chevillard, Pierre Alexandre François.—Méthode complète de Violoncelle, contenant la théorie de l’instrument, des gammes, leçons progressives, études, airs variés, et leçons pour chacune des positions.Paris, 1850 (?)
Corrette, Michel.—Méthode, théorique et pratique, pour apprendre en peu de temps le Violoncelle dans sa perfection. Ensemble des Principes de Musique avec des Leçons à I. et II. Violoncelles, la division de la Corde pour placer si l’on veut dans les commencements, des lignes traversalles sur le manche du Violoncelle, plus une petite Méthode particulière pour ceux qui jouent de la Viole, et qui veullent jouer du Violoncelle composée par Michel Corrette, XXIVe.Ouvrage. À Paris, MDCCXLI.
Crouch, Fred. Will. Nicholls.—Complete Treatise on the Violoncello. London, 1827.
Cupis, Jean Baptiste.—Méthode nouvelle et raisonnée pour apprendre à jouer du Violoncelle où l’on traite de son accord, de la manière de tenir cet instrument avec aisance, de la position de la main sur la touche, du tacte, de l’étendue du manche, de la manière de doigter dans tous les tons majeurs et mineurs, &c. Paris, before 1800.
Dancla, Arnaud.—Méthode de Violoncelle.
Depar, Ernest.—Méthode Elémentaire pour Violoncelle à l’usage des collèges et pensions.Paris, 1850.
Deswert, Jules.—The Violoncello. London.
Dotzauer, Justus Johann Friedrich.—Violoncellschule.Op. 165. Mayence, 1832.
----Violoncellschule fur den ersten Unterricht.Op. 126. Vienna, 1836.
----Praktische Schule des Violoncellspiels. 4 Hefte, Op. 155.Leipzig, 1870.
----Schule des Flageolettspiels.Op. 147. 1837.
Duport, Jean Louis.—Essai sur le doigter du Violoncelle et sur la conduite de l’Archet avec une suite d’exercices, dédié aux Professeurs de Violoncelle.Paris, before 1819.
---- English translation. Essay on the Fingering of the Violoncello, &c., by John Bishop. London, 1853.
Eley, Ch. F.—Improved Method of Instruction for the Violoncello. London, 1830.
Forberg, Friedrich.—Violoncellschule.Op. 31. Leipzig, 1882.
Froehlich, Joseph.—Violoncellschule.Cologne and Bonn, 1810 or 1811.
Gross, Johann Benjamin.—Elemente des Violoncellspiels.Op. 36. Leipzig, 1840.
Gunn, John.—The theory and practice of fingering the Violoncello, containing rules and progressive lessons for attaining the knowledge and command of the whole compass of the instrument. London, 1793.
---- An Essay, theoretical and practical, on the application of Harmony, Thorough bass, and Modulation to the Violoncello. Edinburgh, 1801.
Hamilton, J. A.—Complete Preceptor for the Violoncello with a selection of favourite airs, &c. London, 1840.
Hardy, Henry.—Violoncello Preceptor with a compleat set of scales for fingering in the various keys. Oxford, 1785.
Heberlein, Hermann.—Violoncellschule, neueste, praktische und leicht verständliche Methode für Schul- und Selbstunterricht.Leipzig, 1887.
Henning, Karl.—Kleine Violoncellschule.Op. 37. Leipzig, 1864.
Hus-Deforges, Pierre Louis.—Méthode pour le Violoncelle.Paris, 1805.
Jackson, G.—New Instructor for the Violoncello. London, 1880.
Junod, L.—New and concise Method for the Violoncello. London, 1879.
Kastner, G.—Elementarschule.Leipzig, 1846.
Kauer, Ferdinand.—Kurzgefazte Anweisung das Violoncell zu spielen.Speyer, 1788.
Kummer, Friedrich August.—Violoncellschule.Op. 60. Mayence, 1839.
Lanzetti, Salvatore.—Principes du doigter pour le Violoncelle dans tous les tons.Amsterdam, before 1770.
Lebouc, Charles Joseph.—Méthode complête et pratique de Violoncelle.Paris, 1850.
Lee, Sebastian.—Ecole du Violoncelliste.Paris, 1845.
----Méthode pratique pour le Violoncelliste admise au nombre des ouvrages élémentaires servant à l’enseignement dans le Conservatoire de Musique, Mayence.Op. 30.
---- An English translation, by J. Lidel. Mayence, 1875 or 1882.
----Méthode de Violoncelle et de Basse d’accompagnement rédigée par MM. Baillot, Levasseur, Catel et Baudiot.1804.
---- (Supplement to this School.—Exercices pour le Violoncelle dans toutes les positions du pouce.)
Lindley, Robert.—Hand-Book for the Violoncello, with numerous Gamuts, Scales, Exercises, and Examples.... Manner of holding the Violoncello and of holding the Bow, &c.
Luetgen, H.—First lessons for the Violoncello. London, 1860.
Macdonald, J. A.—Treatise Explanatory of the Principles constituting the Practice and Theory of the Violoncello. London, 1811.
Müntzberger, Joseph.—Nouvelle Méthode pour le violoncelle.Paris, before 1800 (?)
Phillips, W. Lovell.—New and complete instruction for the Violoncello. London, 1846.
Piatti, Alfredo.—Method for the Violoncello. London.
Quarenghi.—Metodo di Violoncello.Milan, 1877.
Rachelle, Pietro.—Breve Metodo.Op. 14. Milan.
Raoul, Jean Marie.—Méthode de violoncelle, contenant une nouvelle exposition des principes de cet instrument.Op. 4. Paris, before 1837.
Reinagle, Joseph.—Concise introduction to the art of playing the Violoncello. London, 1835.
Romberg, Bernhard.—Violoncellschule.Berlin, before 1841.
Roth, Philipp.—Violoncellschule.Op. 14. Leipzig, 1887.
Schetky, Johann Georg.—Practical and progressive lessons for the Violoncello, ded. to J. Crosdill, Esq. London.
Schröder, Karl.—Praktischer Lehrgang des Violoncellspiels.Brunswick, 1878.
----Neue, grosse, theoretisch-praktische Violoncellschule in 4 Abtheilungen.Leipzig, 1876-7.
----Schule der Tonleitern und Akkorde.Op. 29. Hamburg, 1877.
----Schule des Trillers und Staccatos.Op. 39. Leipzig, 1878.
Siedentopf, C.—Violoncellschule.Op. 16. Magdeburg, 1881.
Stiastny(Stiasny),Bernhard W.—Méthode de Violoncelle.Mayence, 1832.
Stransky, Joseph.—Elementarschule des Violoncellspiels.Berlin, 1882.
Swert, Jules de.—seeDeswert.
Thompson, C.—New Instruction for the Violoncello. London, 1780.
Tietz, Aug. Ferd.—Praktischer Lehrgang für den ersten Unterricht des Violoncellspiels.Brunswick.
Tietz, Henrich.—Praktischer Lehrgang für den ersten Unterricht im Violoncellspiel.
Tillière, Joseph Bonaventure.—Méthode pour le violoncelle, contenant tous les principes nécessaires pour bien jouer de cet instrument.Paris, 1764.
Warot, Adolph.—Méthode progressive pour le Violoncelle.Brussels, 1873.
Werner, Joseph.—Praktische Violoncellschule.Op. 12. Cologne, 1882.
Zimmer, Franz.—Theoretisch-praktische Violoncellschule.Op. 20. Quedlinburg, 1879.
(The Gamba-players mentioned in the Introduction are expressly so indicated in the following Index, in order to distinguish them from the Violoncellists.)